Introduction

In recent decades heat transfer enhancement has been a interesting area due to its numerous applications in industries and engineering. Nanofluid are formed when a nano-particle is dispersed in a base fluid namely; water, oils and ethylene glycol. Thermal conductivity of nanofluid is considerably high than convection fluids. The innovation of a new concept hybrid nanofluid, thermal conductivity of poor performing nanofluids has significantly improved. The application of nanofluids includes drilling, electronic cooling, thermal storage, heat and cooling of buildings and microwave tubes1. Nanofluids have plethora of applications in bio-medical such as drug delivery, cancer therapeutics, cryosurgery, sensing and imaging2. Nanofluids have numerous applications in thermal engineering namely; collectors and solar water heaters, solar cells and solar stills3.

Goud et al.4 studied MHD effect on Non Newtonian Casson model subjected to chemical over exponential surface with chemical reaction and heat transfer. Goud and Reddy5 discussed unsteady heat absorption effect with radiation and heat transfer in flow along infinite vertical plate. Arshad et al.6 explored Maxwell fluid with chemical reaction over infinte surface embedded in porous medium for heat enhancement. Reddy et al.7 investigated heat transfer over stretching cylinder under generation/absorption effects. Hassan et al.8 examined heat transfer coefficient using hybrid nanofluids using multiple base fluid under different thermal radiation aspects. Kavya et al.9 demonstrated magnetic hybrid nano-particles over stretching/shrinking cylinder. Reddy et al.10 studied hybrid nanofluid with magnetic field in a irregular vertical channel. Shah et al.11 discussed Non-Newtonian Carreau fluid with convective conduction to investigate the heat transfer with variable thermophysical fluid properties. Goud et al.12 inspected magneto-hydrodynamic convection in a flow under Soret effect when viscous dissipation is significant. Waqas et al.13 explored hybrid nanofluids with silver and gold nano-particles for heat enhancement in a stenosed artery. Some recent studied on heat transfer using nano and hybrid nanofluids14,15,16,17,18.

Chemical reaction occur when two components collide to form a product in the presence of some assisting force namely catalyst. Chemical reactions are of two kinds namely; reversible and irreversible chemical reactions. Chemical reactions which can not be reversed are known as irreversible chemical reactions whereas those chemical reaction which can be reversed are known as reversible chemical reactions. Chemical reaction assist the nano-particle movement in the flow and heat transfer19. Additionally, significance of first order ad higher chemical reaction on the motile microorganism migration and heat transmission has been addressed by numerous researcher in recent years. Yanala et al.20 studied slip effect on transient laminar flow with ramped temperature and first order chemical reaction. Goud et al.21 discussed Non Newtonian Casson model with joule heating and chemical reaction. Hosseinzadeh et al.22 examined nonlinear radiation effect on Maxwell fluid with convective condition subjected to chemical reaction. Khan et al.23 explored third grade magneto-hydrodynamic flow with variable reactive index with chemical reaction effect. Mythili and Sivaraj24 investigated non uniform heat source and sink effect with chemical reaction on Non Newtonian Casson fluid flow. Malik and Rehman25 elaborated effect of second order chemical with heat generation on the free convective flow over inclined surface. Some recent studies with second and higher order chemical reaction effects on different flow regimes26,27,28,29.

Radiation is characterized as distribution of thermal electromagnetic particles through a medium. Thermal radiation therapy is a kind of treatment employed by doctors in a pathological situation which involve transmission of heat below the skin friction into the muscles and tissues. It has been observed that electromagnetic heat namely; shortwaves and microwaves send heat upto 2 inches into the tissues and muscles30,31. Reddy et al.32 discussed ramped plate temperature and heat absorption under thermal radiation effect for magneto-hydrodynamic boundary layer flow. Ge-JiLe et al.33 analyzed the effect of radiation on magnetic fluid with Brownian and Thermophoresis particle diffusion. Hassan et al.34 explored the prescribed wall temperature case with hybrid nano-particle under thermal radiation. Hussain et al.35 demonstrated heat transmission in hybrid flow of single and multi-wall carbon nanotube with radiation impacts. Reddy et al.36 elaborated heat transfer in Casson nanofluid with viscous dissipation effect with particle movement under the impact of thermal radiation. Recently, constructive studies have been carried out to analyze thermal radiation impact with comprehensive flow regimes37,38,39,40,41.

The variable thermophysical fluid properties play significant role in heat transfer enhancement of fluid. The temperature dependent thermal conductivity and temperature dependent viscosity has significant impact on heat transfer. Animasaun and Sandeep42 investigated variable thermal conductivity and viscosity dependent on concentration in nanofluid flow. Salahuddin and Awais43 examined Carreau-Cross fluid comparatively with variable thermal conductivity and thermal radiation. Abbas et al.44 explored magneto-hydrodynamic Carreau flow with homotopy method with variable fluid properties. Khan et al.45 examined Carreau fluid surface with variable thickness using Keller Box method. Nalivale et al.46 studied natural convective flow with viscous dissipation and thermal radiation effects. Megahed et al.47 described Carreau fluid with heat flux and variable thermal conductivity under thermal radiation impact. Irfan et al.48 studied heat source/sink and generalized Fourier’s law under variable thermal conductivity influence in Carreau fluid flow. Waqas et al.49 discussed variable fluid properties effect on Carreau fluid with mixed convection in stagnation point flow.

In the above conducted literature review plethora of researchers had discussed the nanofluids with externally applied effects for heat transfer enhancement. Animasaun and Sandeep42 used variable thermal conductivity and variable visocity dependent on concentration to discuss the nanofluid flow over stretched surface. They ignored thermal and chemical impacts in their study. While, Salahuddin and Awais43 investigated Cross and Carreau model comparatively employing only variable thermal conductivity with thermal radiation. Abbas44 used analytical methodology to study the impact of variable fluid properties effect on Carreau fluid with MHD effect ignoring the chemical transportation. Khan45 elaborated the Carreau fluid over surface of variable thickness using Keller Box method in the absence of any variable thermophysical fluid property. Megahed47 studied Carreau fluid with heat flux and radiation effect using only variable thermal conductivity model and in the absence of variable viscosity. Irfan48 discussed variable thermal conductivity with generalized Fourier law and Waqas49 used both variable thermal conductivity and viscosity to examine Carreau flow model in stagnation point regime.

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact variable heat dependent fluid properties such as thermal conductivity and viscosity on radiative heat transfer in magnetized Carreau fluid model subjected to first order chemical reaction. The novelty of the current article is to examine heated boundary condition, chemical reaction and Rosseland radiation approximation effect on magnetized Non Newtonian Carreau fluid. Furthermore, Abbas44 used homotopy analysis method, Khan45 employed Keller box method to dicuss Carreau fluid, Irfan48 computed Carreau fluid with BVP-4c, Waqas49 explored series solution of Carreau fluid. In this work, we have used shooting method with Newton’s method to solve the Carreau fluid flow. The impact of varying fluid parameters on different study profiles is obtained and presented graphically. Shear stress and heat transfer coefficient are presented in tabulated data set.

Formulation of problem

Problem description

Let us consider flow of in-compressible magnetized Non-Newtonian Carreau fluid flow under the effect of thermal radiation and subjected to first order chemical reaction over a stretched surface with heated boundary. The surface has been stretched with the \({u}_{w}=a{x}^{m}\) stretching velocity in horizontal direction. Where, \(m\) in surface stretching velocity denote the non linearity parameter. Whereas the surface as ambient condition of temperature and concentration are represented with well known notations \({T}_{w},{T}_{\infty } and {C}_{w}, {C}_{\infty }\), respectively. Thus the general flow governing equations are given as follows:

Continuity equation11,44,44

$$\frac{\partial u}{{\partial x}} + \frac{\partial v}{{\partial y}} = 0.$$
(1)

Momentum equation11,44,47

$$u\frac{\partial u}{{\partial x}} + v\frac{\partial u}{{\partial y}} = \frac{1}{\rho }\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left[ {\mu \frac{\partial u}{{\partial y}}} \right] + 3v_{f} \frac{n - 1}{2}\Gamma^{2} \left( {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial y}}} \right)^{2} \frac{{\partial^{2} u}}{{\partial y^{2} }} + \frac{\sigma }{\rho }J^{2} \left( {u_{e} - u} \right) + u_{e} \frac{{\partial u_{e} }}{\partial x}.$$
(2)

Heat equation

$$u\frac{\partial T}{{\partial x}} + v\frac{\partial T}{{\partial y}} = \frac{{k_{f} }}{{\left( {\rho c_{p} } \right)_{f} }}\left[ {\frac{{\partial^{2} T}}{{\partial y^{2} }}} \right] - \frac{1}{{\left( {\rho c_{p} } \right)_{f} }}\frac{{\partial \left( {q_{r} } \right)}}{\partial y}.$$
(3)

Species transfer equation11,44

$$u\frac{\partial C}{{\partial x}} + v\frac{\partial C}{{\partial y}} = D\frac{{\partial^{2} C}}{{\partial^{2} y}} - K_{r} (C - C_{\infty } ).$$
(4)

All the terminologies have been given in the nomenclature section so we must omit elaborating them here. In the above Eqs. (14), \(u,v\) are components of the velocity vector, \(\mu\) denote dynamic viscosity, \(n\) describe the power law index, is electrical conductivity, \(\rho\) denotes the density, \({u}_{e}\) represent some external velocity, \(j\) denote the magnetization force, \({k}_{f}\) is temperature, is thermal conductivity, \((\rho {C}_{p})\) describe the specific heat capacity, \(C\) denote the species profile, \(D\) describe the thermal diffusivity, \({K}_{r}\) and represent the first order chemical reaction. Further, as we inspecting the Carreau fluid with variable fluid properties. Therefore, the relations used in this study to incorporate the effect of variable heat dependent fluid properties are given in following study11:

$$\mu \left( T \right) = \mu^{*} \left[ {N_{1} - h_{1} \left( {T_{\infty } - T} \right)} \right],k_{f} \left( T \right) = k_{f} *\left[ {N_{2} - h_{2} \left( {T_{\infty } - T} \right)} \right].$$
(5)

The boundaries associated with above flow governing model are given as11:

$$\begin{aligned} & u = u_{w} \left( x \right) = ax^{m} ,v = v_{w} \left( x \right),\frac{\partial T}{{\partial y}} = - \frac{{q_{w} \left( x \right)}}{{k_{f} }},C = C_{w} \quad at\quad y \to 0, \\ & u \to u_{e} \left( x \right) = bx^{m} ,T \to T_{\infty } ,C \to C_{\infty } \quad at\quad y \to \infty . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(6)

\({\mu }^{*}\) and \({{k}_{f}}^{*}\) in the preceding equation describe the effect of heat dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity. whereas \({h}_{1}, {h}_{2}, {N}_{1} and {N}_{2}\) are some positive constants. In addition, the values \({N}_{1} and {N}_{2}\) are set to 1. Figure 1 show the configuration and coordinate system of present problem.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representation of physical model.

Similarity transform and dimensionless flow equations

Suitable similarity transforms used in this study are reported by Shah11. We are employing same similarity transforms to convert dimensional flow equations into non dimensionless form. The similarity transform are as follow:

$$\theta \left( \eta \right) = \frac{{T - T_{w} }}{{\left( {T_{\infty } - T_{w} } \right)}},\phi \left( \eta \right) = \frac{{T - T_{w} }}{{\left( {T_{\infty } - T_{w} } \right)}},\varphi = \left( {bv} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} x^{{\frac{m + 1}{2}}} f\left( \xi \right),\xi = \left( \frac{b}{v} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} yx^{{\frac{m - 1}{2}}} .$$
(7)

Stream function is denoted by \(\varphi\). The dimensionless flow governing equations are given as follow:

$$\begin{aligned} & f^{\prime\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) + m\left( {1 - f^{{\prime}{2}} \left( \xi \right)} \right) + \frac{m + 1}{2}f\left( \xi \right)f^{\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) + \xi f^{\prime\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) - \xi \left( {f^{\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right)\theta^{\prime}\left( \xi \right) + f^{\prime\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right)\theta \left( \xi \right)} \right) \\ & \quad + \frac{3}{2}\left( {n - 1} \right)We^{2} f^{{\prime\prime}{2}} \left( \xi \right)f^{\prime\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right)M^{2} \left( {1 - f^{\prime}\left( \xi \right)} \right) = 0, \\ \end{aligned}$$
(8)
$$\theta^{\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) + Pr\frac{{\frac{m + 1}{2}}}{{1 - \frac{4}{3}R}}\theta^{\prime}\left( \xi \right)f\left( \xi \right) + \frac{\varepsilon }{{1 - \frac{4}{3}R}}\left( {\theta \left( \xi \right)\theta^{\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) + \theta^{{\prime}{2}} \left( \xi \right)} \right),$$
(9)
$$\phi^{\prime\prime}\left( \xi \right) + Le\frac{m + 1}{2}\phi^{\prime}\left( \xi \right)f\left( \xi \right) + Le\frac{m + 1}{2}\phi \left( \xi \right)\gamma .$$
(10)

The associated boundaries are given as:

$$\begin{aligned} & f\left( 0 \right) = S,f^{\prime}\left( 0 \right) = B,\theta^{\prime}\left( 0 \right) = 1,\phi \left( 0 \right) = 1,\quad at\quad \xi \to 0 \\ & f^{\prime}\left( \xi \right) \to 1,\theta \left( \xi \right) \to 0,\phi \left( \xi \right) \to 0,\quad at\quad \xi \to \infty . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(11)

In the above equations \({\mathrm{We}}^{2}=\frac{{\Gamma }^{2}{b}^{3}{x}^{3m-1}}{{\upupsilon }_{\mathrm{f}}}\) denotes Weissenberg number, \({\mathrm{M}}^{2}=\frac{\upsigma {\mathrm{J}}^{2}}{\mathrm{\rho b}}\) is magnetic field parameter, \(\mathrm{S}=\frac{-2{v}_{w}}{(bv{)}^{1/2}(m+1) {x}^{\frac{m-1}{2}}}\) is suction/injection parameter, \(B=\frac{a}{b}\) is stretching ratio, Prandtl number is given as \(Pr=\frac{\mu {C}_{p}}{{k}_{f}}\), variable heat dependent viscosity is denoted by \(\upxi = {h}_{1}({T}_{\infty }-{T}_{w})\), variable heat dependent thermal conductivity is represented by \(\upepsilon = {h}_{2}({T}_{\infty }-{T}_{w})\), \(R=\frac{4{\sigma }^{*}{T}_{0}^{3}}{{k}^{*}{k}_{f}}\) is thermal radiation parameter,\(\gamma =\frac{2{K}_{r}}{b(m+1){x}^{m-1}}\) is chemical reaction parameter and \(Le=\frac{{\nu }_{f}}{D}\) Lewis Number.

Methodology of numerical solution

Abbas44 used homotopy analysis method, Khan45 employed Keller box method to dicuss Carreau flui, Irfan48 computed Carreau fluid with BVP-4c, Waqas49 explored series solution of Carreau fluid. In this work, we have used shooting method with Newton’s method to solve the Carreau fluid flow. The procedure of shooting method is elaborated below:

$$\begin{aligned} & f = Y_{1} ,f^{\prime} = Y^{\prime}_{1} = Y_{2} ,f^{\prime\prime} = Y^{\prime\prime}_{2} = Y_{3} ,f^{\prime\prime\prime} = Y^{\prime}_{3} ,\theta = Y_{4} ,\theta^{\prime} = Y^{\prime}_{4} = Y_{5} ,\theta^{\prime\prime} = Y^{\prime}_{5} , \\ & \phi = Z_{1} ,\phi^{\prime} = Z^{\prime}_{1} = Z_{2} ,\phi^{\prime\prime} = Z^{\prime}_{2} . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(12)

The obtained first order ODE’s after using the notation (12) are given as follow:

$$Y^{\prime}_{1} = Y_{2} ,$$
(13)
$$Y^{\prime}_{2} = Y_{3} ,$$
(14)
$$Y^{\prime}_{3} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( { - m(1 - Y^{2}_{2} } \right) - \frac{m + 1}{2}Y_{1} Y_{3} + \xi Y_{3} Y_{5} - M^{2} \left( {1 - Y_{2} } \right)}}{{1 + \xi - \xi Y_{4} + \frac{3}{2}\left( {n - 1} \right)We^{2} Y_{3}^{2} }}} \right],$$
(15)
$$Y^{\prime}_{4} = Y_{5} ,$$
(16)
$$Y^{\prime}_{5} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {1 - \frac{4}{3}R} \right)\left( { - \Pr \frac{m + 1}{2}Y_{1} Y_{5} - \varepsilon Y^{2}_{5} } \right)}}{{1 + \varepsilon Y_{4} }}} \right],$$
(17)
$$Z^{\prime}_{1} = Z_{2} ,$$
(18)
$$Z^{\prime}_{2} = - \frac{m + 1}{2}LefZ_{2} - \frac{m + 1}{2}\gamma LeZ_{1} .$$
(19)

Suitable boundary conditions are given as:

$$Y_{1} \left( 0 \right) = S,Y_{2} \left( 0 \right) = B,Y_{3} \left( 0 \right) = r,Y_{4} \left( 0 \right) = q,Y_{5} \left( 0 \right) = 1,Z_{1} \left( 0 \right) = 1,Z_{2} \left( 0 \right) = Q.$$
(20)

The missing conditions \(r,q and Q\) assumed to validate the below relations:

$$Y_{2} \left( {\xi ,r,q} \right) = 1,Y_{2} \left( {\xi ,r,q} \right) = 0,Z_{1} \left( {\xi ,r,q} \right) = 0.$$
(21)

The stopping criterion is given as:

$$\max \left\{ {\left| {Y_{2} \left( {\xi_{\infty } } \right) - 1} \right|,\left| {Y_{4} \left( {\xi_{\infty } } \right)} \right|} \right\} < \delta ,and\left| {Z_{1} \left( {\xi_{\infty } ,Q} \right)} \right| < \delta .$$
(22)

Results and discussion

In this section the effect of different study parameters such as stretching ratio, variable thermal conductivity, variable viscosity, magnetic field, Lewis number, Weissenberg number, suction/blowing, and Prandtl number is discussed on the velocity, temperature and concentration profiles. Additionally, the shear stress rates and Nusselt number under influence of different parameter are also given in tabulated data set.

Through diagrams and figures, the physical impact of major parameters on skin friction, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number has been discussed. In the present survey, the shooting method has been opted for reproducing the values of \(C{f}_{x}\) and \(N{u}_{x}\). The results presented in Tables 1, 2, 3 discuss the impact of mass suction, power law index and non linearity influence combined with magnetization force illustrate on \(C{f}_{x}\) and \(N{u}_{x}\).

Table 1 Numeric results of skin friction and heat transfer coefficient under influence of stretching ratio and strong mass suction impact.
Table 2 Numeric results of skin friction and heat transfer coefficient under influence of stretching ratio and power law index impact.
Table 3 Numeric results of skin friction and heat transfer coefficient under influence of stretching ratio and non linearity effect.

Figure 2a shows the combine impact of power law index and magnetization effect on Carreau fluid over stretching and shrinking surface. It is observed that with increment in power law index velocity of Carreau fluid has increased for stretching surface whereas when power law index in augmented with magnetic field for shrinking surface the motion of Carreau fluid has decreased. Additionally, momentum boundary layer has expanded under power law index and magnetic force for shrinking surface. Figure 2b depicts influence of mass suction effect with magnetic field. It is worth noting that over the stretching and shrinking surface the motion of Carreau fluid has increased. Furthermore, interestingly momentum layer associated with shrinking surface has expanded under high impact mass suction effect. Figure 2c describe the impression of non linearity in the presence of strong magnetization force on velocity profile. When the non linearity in either stretching or shrinking is incremented motion profile of Carreau fluid show an increasing behaviour. It is observed that with increment in non linearity the momentum layer has expanded more rapidly for shrinking surface as compared stretching surface.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Power law index effect on \({f}^{^{\prime}}\). (b) Suction impact on \({f}^{^{\prime}}\). (c) Non-linearity impression on \({f}^{^{\prime}}\). (d) Weissenberg number outcome on \({f}^{^{\prime}}\).

Figure 2d discuss the impact of Weissenberg number on motion profile of Carreau fluid in the presence of strong magnetic force over the stretching and shrinking sheet. Carreau fluid velocity has decreased over stretching surface with augmentation in Weissenberg number. On the other hand it is observed that increment in Weissenberg number and magnetic field has increased Carreau fluid motion profile over shrinking surface. Figure 3a illustrate the effect of variable viscosity parameter on Carreau fluid motion profile over stretching and shrinking surface. It is discovered that with increment in viscosity of Carreau fluid the fluid motion over stretching and shrinking surfaces has dramatically decreased. This effect occurs due to enhancement in boundary layer thickness of Carreau fluid with increment in viscosity of Carreau fluid. Additionally, velocity profile has decreased under combined increment in variable viscosity and magnetic force. The resistive force generated in vicinity of boundary layer due to applied high magnetic field in boundary layer has reduced the motion profile of velocity profile.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Varying viscosity effect on \({f}^{^{\prime}}\). (b) Non-linearity impact on \(\theta\). (c) Prandtl number influence on \(\theta\). (d) Varying viscosity impression on \(\theta\)

Figure 3b shows the impact of non linearity parameter on temperature profile of Carreau fluid over stretching surface. It is observed that with increment in non linearity parameter temperature profile has decreased. Additionally, thermal boundary layer thickness has increased in the presence of high viscosity and thermal conductivity parameter. Figure 3c describe the impact of Prandtl number on temperature profile of Carreau fluid. It is interesting to note here that when Prandtl number is incremented the temperature profile enhance consequently the associated thermal boundary layer has increased. Moreover, it is discovered that with variable viscosity and thermal conductivity the temperature profile has increased under Prandtl number increment. Figure 3d discuss impact of variable viscosity parameter on temperature profile of Carreau fluid. When viscosity of Carreau fluid is increment as a result the thickness of boundary layer increase which consequently decline the associated motion profile and temperature profile. It is worth mentioning here that with increment in viscosity of Carreau fluid thermal boundary layer of fluid contracted due to reduction in thickness of boundary layer.

Figure 4a,b discuss concentration profile of Carreau fluid under influence of Lewis number and chemical reaction parameters, respectively. Concentration profile under incremental change in Lewis number has sharply decreased. As a result associated concentration boundary of Carreau fluid has shown rapid contraction (see Fig. 4a). Figure 4b demonstrate impact of chemical reaction parameter on concentration profile. Concentration profile has decreased with increment in chemical reaction parameter. It is worth noting here that concentration layer has expanded with increment in chemical reaction parameter.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) Lewis number impact on \(\phi\). (b) Chemical reaction Influence on \(\phi\).

Table 1 shows outcomes of shear stress rates and Nusselt number of Carreau fluid under combined impact of magnetic force and mass suction effect. It is interesting to note here that when mass suction effect is incremented in the absence of magnetization force shear stress and heat transfer coefficient have increased. Moreover, with applied strong magnetization force and mass suction effect shear stress and Nusselt further enhance. Table 2 describe the impact of power law index and magnetic field on engineering quantities. Reduced shear stress rates are observed under the increment in power law index and constant applied magnetization. It is also worth mentioning here that shear stress rate increase in Carreau fluid when magnetization force magnitude is turned negative in presence of power law index. Furthermore, Nusselt number has remained consistent with change in attributes of magnetization force. Table 3 illustrate shear stress rate under impact of non linearity parameter. It is observed that by raising the non linearity values shear stress and heat transfer coefficient of Carreau fluid have increased even with high applied magnetization force on Carreau fluid. Table 4 show the agreement between the present outcomes of shear stress and heat transfer coefficient with those of Abbas44.

Table 4 Comparison of present outcomes of Nusselt number and skin friction with already published results by Abbas44.

Comparison analysis with previous works

In our study if we neglect the Rosseland thermal radiation approximation and first order chemical reaction then our flow governing model will coincide with work of Abbas44. Megahed47 addressed only temperature dependent thermal conductivity influence on the Carreau fluid. They didn’t consider chemical reaction effect and ignored the species transport in their study. Waqas49 also ignored the species transportation phenomenon and convective boundary condition while modelling the flow governing equations. Additionally, they used variable temperature dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity model to investigate the Carreau fluid. Furthermore, Abbas44 utilized the analytical method commonly known as homotopy analysis method, whereas in this study we have addressed the Carreau fluid with Shooting method and Newton’s method. If we set the same parametric values as given in Table 1 by Abbas44 to obtain the numeric results for the skin friction and Nusselt number, good agreement has been found for Nusselt number between the results achieved by Abbas44 and present work. Additionally, raising the chemical reaction expands the thickness of concentration layer and decline species profile.

Conclusion

In this work, Non-Newtonian Carreau fluid has been numerical investigated in the presence of temperature dependent thermophysical properties over the non-linear stretching/shrinking surface. The Rosseland thermal radiation relation has been taken into account to explore the influence of Rosseland approximation of thermal radiation on Carreau fluid, the fluid has been subjected to first order chemical reaction. Below are the major findings of this study:

  1. 1.

    Motion of Carreau fluid increased with raising the values of mass suction and non-linearity. Whereas decline has been observed when power law index, Wessienberg number variable viscosity values are increased.

  2. 2.

    Prandtl number and viscosity augmentation increase temperature profile whereas non-linearity increment decrease temperature profile.

  3. 3.

    Concentration profile has rapidly decreased by raising values of Lewis number and chemical reaction values. Further, the concentration layer has expanded by raising the values of chemical species transport and chemical reaction.

  4. 4.

    Skin friction and Nusselt number has shown strictly increasing behaviour under raising effect of mass suction for stretching/shrinking.

  5. 5.

    Raising the power law index produce reduced shear rates whereas in the event of shrinking skin friction enhance.

  6. 6.

    Nusselt number has significantly improved by raising the values of non linearity parameter. Stretching has produced reduced skin friction as compared to shrinking surface.