Abstract
Climate change profoundly influences plants and animals in all ecosystems including drylands such as semi-arid and arid scrublands and grasslands. At the peak of an extended megadrought in the Southwestern USA, the microclimatic refuges provided by foundation plant species and through associated vegetation were examined. Shrubs and open interstitial spaces without a canopy but with annual plants were instrumented in 2016 and the wet season of 2017 in the central drylands of California. In both years and all seasons tested, vegetation significantly mediated fine-scale near-surface air temperature and relative soil moisture content—defined here as microclimate. The foundation species with other vegetation provided the most significant thermal refuge potential capacity for other plants and animals, but there was variation by growing season. Soil moisture content was frequently increased by the direct canopy effects of shrubs. This evidence suggests that the climate many plants and animals experience, even during an extended megadrought, is mediated by the local plants in highly impacted drylands with anthropogenic disturbance and significant water-induced challenges. Foundation species such as shrubs in drylands function as a potent starting point in examining the ecological relevance of climate at scales germane to many species locally. An ecological framework for climate resilience using shrubs will improve conservation and restoration planning in drylands.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Climate change is palpable. In drylands including deserts and semi-arid grasslands and scrublands, the direct and indirect impacts of climate are profound1. Climate drivers relevant to plant, animals, and most dimensions of human interactions in these ecosystems are influenced through at least three key changes2. Increased mean temperatures that drive vegetation loss in drylands1. Increased variability in temperatures and precipitation3,4,5. Extended drought or megadroughts6,7 that impose environmental limitations and constraints on ecological resilience and function through water limitations for natural vegetation and for agriculture regionally8. In concert with this forcing from climate, vegetation with land use changes9 and groundwater processes10,11,12 strongly suggest that resilience is in jeopardy in terms of many ecosystem functions including biodiversity preservation13.
There are many solutions and mitigation strategies ranging from local to global14 and from policy and science15 to stakeholder restoration and management16. We propose that a simple solution at fine-scales is to design strategies that capitalize on existing and extant vegetation—particularly resident native species—and those fundamental to function such as foundation species. A foundation species is one that is not necessarily common but that provides critical support for ecological processes that structure community assembly and diversity patterns17,18. Here, surface air temperature and available soil moisture were examined, but more complex measures including water loss via the transpiration of plants can also be important ecological processes relevant to understanding the direct and indirect effects of foundation plant species in drylands. The hypothesis that plants can buffer climate change has been tested primarily through landscape-level analyses such as NDVI/vegetation land cover19 or in northern ecosystems20,21. However, foundation plant species such as shrubs that comprise a significant component of the structure in some of these drylands systems provide many key ecological functions and can also mitigate climate change effects in at least four micro-environmental capacities22.
The following contrasting predictions can be explored to examine this hypothesis through fine-scale structured ecological monitoring. (1) Shrubs decouple key micro-environmental measures of climate such as near-surface air temperature and soil moisture from open, non-canopied or interstitial microsites within a dryland region (i.e. distinct refuges)23. (2) Shrubs buffer the microclimate but changes between shrub-open contrasts move in tandem (reduced magnitude in stressors but similar trends seasonally)24. (3) Shrubs indirectly influence microclimate through facilitation of ground-covering plants (indirect vegetation buffering)22. (4) Finally, shrubs interact with microclimate in less linear or predictable capacities or do not necessarily provide a fine-scale refuge with positive influences on microclimate consistent with assumed and other reported ecological benefits25. Excepting the final null prediction, the overarching hypothesis posits that shrubs and vegetation provide critical heterogeneity in key climate drivers at fine-scales. Specifically, the direct effects of a canopy provide ecologically meaningful heterogeneity in conditions for both plants and animals in the soils, soil moisture profiles, and unique temperature regimes from other desert microsites. There are also a host of indirect interactions that can function to provide resilience through the differences in how other plants and the animals respond to these microenvironmental and simple structural effects in the functioning of natural community dynamics.
The relative importance of microclimatic refuges and heterogeneity was examined using foundation plant species, shrubs, in Cuyama Valley in the central drylands of California at the peak of the megadrought in the Southwestern North America (SWNA). This megadrought occurred from 2000 to 20187. A megadrought is a particularly sustained and severe drought that spans many years and typically eclipses frequently observed dry episodes during 20th-century instrumental observations6. Cuyama Valley is centrally located within the interior drylands of California (Fig. 1). It encompasses arid and semi-arid habitats, and its ecological and anthropogenic value is significant regionally26. It is also challenged with varied hydrological limitations and water use environmental uncertainties27. It is thus a critical hotspot for microclimatic importance studies that examine the relative importance of salient and sensible assets ecologically such as vegetation. Ephedra californica is the dominant and most common shrub and native woody species within this region28, and it has low specific leaf areas29, long-lived30, low water needs for recruitment31, excellent recovery following disturbance32, and functions as a foundation species ecologically33,34. Accurate near-surface air temperatures with soil moisture content, structured to inform ecological processes, were used to inform a deeper understanding of microclimatic interactions that are germane to resident species35. Sensors were deployed under the shrubs and in the open, interstitial spaces without a canopy but with annual plants in all 12 months of 2016 and the 4 months of winter (or historical wet season in these drylands) for 2017. In half of the microsites, all aboveground non-woody vegetation was routinely clipped to further examine the importance of low lying, ground cover vegetation such as herbs, forbs, and grasses. This generated the following four microclimatic opportunities to instrument: shrub canopy, shrub with ground-covering vegetation, open microsites without a canopy or vegetation, and open microsite with ground-covering vegetation.
Vegetation was an important mediator of microclimate sampled during the SWNA megadrought (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). Shrubs with an intact annual plant community of ground cover were an important microclimatic refuge in the winter 2017 with a significant lower mean annual temperature (Fig. 2, Non-linear mixed effects model, F-value (temp, microsite) = 4.682, p = 0.03, with estimated marginal means contrasts, p < 0.001). Ground cover vegetation mostly comprised of annual plants also influenced microclimate in non-canopied open microsites primarily in reducing soil moisture content (Fig. 2, Non-linear mixed effects model, F-value (moisture, treatment) = 158, p = 0.0001 with estimated marginal means contrasts, p < 0.001). Consequently, the most parsimonious ecological interpretation suggests that there are tradeoffs in the potential amelioration effects provided by resident plant species in the form of a native shrub foundation species and ground cover vegetation36,37. The canopy drives many processes locally in deserts38,39, and annual plants respond to soil moisture and precipitation patterns via drawdown and at times increased water use40,41. The synergistic or indirect benefits of facilitation of shrubs with an intact annual community42,43 provided the most significant returns on buffering through fine-scale patterning in plants suggest that complex direct and indirect community assembly processes44 influence climate mitigation capacities45. This is both novel and a critical research opportunity. Nonetheless, it is tempting to interpret differences between growing seasons and years instrumented here during the megadrought46. Mean annual temperature and precipitation differed in 2016 relative to 2017 for this region (2016 MAT 18.7 °C, MAP 215 mm; 2017 17.9 °C, 184 mm)47. However, limited snapshots in climatic series and inter-annual variability in drylands specifically40,48 suggest a more productive route to inform inference and decision making must include finer-scale estimates and more than one growing season. Variability is the norm not the anomaly—even within a single year between historically defined wet and dry seasons. Time-lag effects have also been detected in many grasslands globally49,50. We must manage for fine-scale heterogeneity through resident plant communities in dryland ecosystems because they provide crucial spatial heterogeneity (Fig. 3). Consistently lower or higher near-surface air temperatures were provided by foundation species to other resident species within this region. Gradual shifts in the microclimate within a season temporally coupled with the spatial heterogeneity in the vegetation tested here likely enables ‘tiny niches’ and shifting climate-envelope matching for both plants21,51 and animals—particularly ecotherms52,53. Temperature and soil moisture are but one set of many filters and capacities that we need to examine, and variability within a habitat is a resource and an asset54. Plants also provide other functions including carbon sequestration9 and resources directly for animals55. Further to the climate predictions here, shrubs can decouple some microclimatic measures but typically moved in concert with larger climatic trends and other vegetation present in the ecosystem. Buffering was detected but so were trade-offs induced by vegetation. The hypothesis that foundation species and other plants can enable fine-scale climate partitioning within drylands was thus supported.
Shrubs are the anchor of many mixed drylands. Canopy functions and stabilization by even relatively low stature but long-lived, ancient shrubs29 in many arid and semi-arid ecosystems can nonetheless provide fine-scale climate refuges23 and facilitate other species32,56. Similar to research in forests, canopy effects provide both direct and indirect buffering and mediation capacities from a rapidly changing climate both through heterogeneity and simple cover57. Unfortunately, all plant community composition measures in these ecosystems including grasslands globally can be negatively impacted by global change drivers58. Microclimatic approaches to modeling predictive responses to climate change at the ground level or plant and animal eye view in many systems to climate51 will be dramatically improved. The interaction between foundation plant species and climate will further provide a mitigation and management solution for stakeholders to consider in developing offset and conservation plans at novel and sensible scales. A generalized recent hierarchical conceptual workflow described by ‘protect-manage-restore’ for climate mitigation59, in that order, is thus strongly supported for dryland regions in California. First step, protect these relict native shrublands to provide microclimatic heterogeneity. This relatively passive investment in water resource infrastructure through vegetation is also one path forward to more effective water governance socially60. The patterns in vegetation-microclimate detected here need not always provide positive benefits on climate stressors in terms of direct amelioration but they did provide an important form of heterogeneity in climate at fine-scales that will reduce the risk or local extirpation and extinctions by providing species with options, or room to move, so as to access a variety of climatic regimes—particularly for species sensitive to temperature61. Planning and managing for microclimatic heterogeneity through both foundation plant species such as shrubs and ground-covering plants is thus a viable long-term solution in drylands facing megadroughts and other climate forcings associated with temperature and moisture.
Methods
Study site and species
Cuyama Valley is a mixed scrubland habitat located within the San Joaquin Desert in Central California, 34°56′53″ N 119°41′21″ W26. Water availability was already severely limited in this region in the last 60 years prior to the megadrought studied herein, and current work suggests further water deficits in precipitation, recharge, and groundwater with non-sustainable water use patterns predicted to continue under all human use and climate change scenarios62. The vegetation and climate spans arid to semi-arid temperatures and precipitation regimes consistent with generalized aridity patterns for most drylands globally63,64. There is thus a long history of groundwater measurement and management65. More recent studies report significant declines in groundwater availability62,66 and rapid declines in the elevation of the valley floor67. These patterns are associated with withdrawals from substantial irrigation68 and reduced inputs from precipitation during the megadrought6. US climate data from the region reports decreased precipitation in the years examined herein69. Additional climate data products queries confirmed these trends (i.e., Climate Research Unit, CRU version 4.05, high-resolution gridded datasets, and a single federal local weather station within valley). A total of 14 unique annual plant species, both native and exotic, were identified through vegetation censuses within the region during this study period70. The sole shrub species present regionally was Ephedra californica or Mormon Tea71. This native shrub is in the Gentales division and can reach heights of over 1 m72. It has a thready, diffuse canopy comprised of leaf-like needles similar to gymnosperms73. In spite of its limited canopy cover relative to other desert foundation shrub species such as Larrea species74, it functions as an ecological foundation species supporting other plants and animals32,34,75. Numerous small animals are present within the region including the US federally endangered species Gambelia sila76 that serves as an excellent flagship species within the state for many endangered desert species77. This vertebrate species and others have been shown to rely on Ephedra californica54,78.
Experimental design
All accessible sites within the Cuyama Valley on public lands were surveyed for the presence of Ephedra californica the previous year (i.e. in 2015, over 700 km2 of drylands were censused for presence of this shrub species). Land classification maps were used to identify publicly designated lands. Every minimally pristine remnant patch or site of this native shrub species that was identified was instrumented in this study in 2016 and the winter of 2017. Pristine was parsimoniously defined as estimated effectively intact ecological function (i.e. shrubs present and with green tissue, and some native ground-cover vegetation present at the site), some evidence of resident biodiversity including native plant species and animal sign such as burrows, and these criteria were further coupled with evidence for relatively limited direct anthropogenic disturbances from agriculture or other activities within a 1 km2 area79,80 of a stand of shrubs. A site was defined as a relict stand of native shrubs with at least 30–50 intact and established adult individuals present within that constrained spatial extent. These relicts represent some of the extant distribution of this ancient shrub species, Ephedra californica, within the San Joaquin Desert and specifically the Cuyama Valley. A total of 180 adult shrubs were measured and assigned unique identifiers at the start of the growing season in January 2016. A total of 36 pairs of shrub-open microsites were then randomly selected from this comprehensive survey at independent sites at least 1 km2 in surface area that also met the additional criteria list above. Hobo 12-Bit Temperature Smart Sensors (https://www.onsetcomp.com/products/sensors/s-tmb-m0xx) with 10 cm soil moisture sensors (https://www.onsetcomp.com/products/sensors/s-smd-m005) were logged with sets of plug-and-play weather stations (https://www.onsetcomp.com/hobo-micro-station/). The reported and independently estimated error is + /− 3% for these specific sensors in field contexts81. This specific array deployment provides accurate near-surface air temperature and soil moisture contents relevant to ecological processes82. Measurements are at the scale of immediate and direct shrub canopy effects sampling up to 1 m2 of surface area ecologically for other plants and animals. A profile of temperature included up to 25 cm of near-surface air estimates, and soil moisture to a depth of 10 cm. These ranges are highly relevant to most annual plant species within the region. At each paired shrub-open microsite, all living aboveground plant material was removed by repeated clippings throughout the duration of microclimatic tracking. The removal of plant material complied with relevant national guidelines and legislation under the authority of the Bureau of Land Management, and no federally listed species were present83.
Data and statistical models
All microclimatic data are publicly archived84. Data quality and control, exploratory data analyses with sensitivity analyses, and reported statistical models were done in R version 4.2.185. Scripts are provided (Supplementary Text). Near-surface air temperatures and soil moisture did not demonstrate significant heteroscedasticity (p > 0.05 in Goodness-of-fit distributional testing), and missing values due to sporadic sensor failures were not imputed but coded as not available or NA in the R programming language. A total of 1,107,452 unique microclimatic measurements were recorded for the duration of the experiment (16 full months sampled). These data were summarized by hourly means for each sensor for each microsite instrumented (plotted in Fig. 2 as seasonal means per year for clarity and visualization of high-level patterns; however frequency histograms of the primary data are also provided in Supplementary Fig. 1). Season for this plot was defined using historical precedents of winter rains in the drylands of California, i.e. wet season wherein rainfall can potentially occur between November and April47. Models accounted for non-independence by nesting microsites within time (Supplementary Table 1). Site and microsite were modeled as random factors. Data were not modeled as unique pairs but treated as region-level estimate. Alternative data structures including all other measures of central tendency were examined and demonstrated robust trends to reported models including tests for season as a simple factor without year. Temperature and soil moisture data streams were examined individually using nonlinear-mixed effects models using the R package ‘nlme'86. The manipulative treatment of ground-cover vegetation was modeled as a fixed effect. Sensitivity analysis for data aggregation (hourly, monthly, seasonally, annually and spatially) with potential spatiotemporal autocorrelation dynamics were examined87. Model sensitivity was also examined by fitting mixed-effects, random models using the R package ‘lme4’88. The nonlinear-mixed models were robust and accurate. Post hoc contrasts were done using the R package ‘emmeans’89. This package computes contrasts and linear functions of the estimated marginal means derived from the nonlinear-mixed effect models. The climatograph shows the primary hourly data for the microclimatic data collected in this study.
Data availability
Data are freely available at Figshare. https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cuyama_micronet/11888199.
References
Hantson, S., Huxman, T. E., Kimball, S., Randerson, J. T. & Goulden, M. L. Warming as a driver of vegetation loss in the Sonoran Desert of California. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG005942. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005942 (2021).
Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A., Kelsey, R., Hart, A. K. & Butterfield, H. S. Better late than never: A synthesis of strategic land retirement and restoration in California. Ecosphere 9, e02367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2367 (2018).
Ye, J.-S., Reynolds, J. F., Sun, G.-J. & Li, F.-M. Impacts of increased variability in precipitation and air temperature on net primary productivity of the Tibetan Plateau: A modeling analysis. Clim. Change 119, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0719-2 (2013).
Pendergrass, A. G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C. & Sanderson, B. M. Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci. Rep. 7, 17966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y (2017).
Zhang, W. et al. Increasing precipitation variability on daily-to-multiyear time scales in a warmer world. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8021. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf8021 (2021).
Stahle David, W. Anthropogenic megadrought. Science 368, 238–239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6902 (2020).
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600 (2020).
Bryant, B. P. et al. Shaping land use change and ecosystem restoration in a water-stressed agricultural landscape to achieve multiple benefits. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 138 (2020).
Ross, C. W. et al. Woody-biomass projections and drivers of change in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01034-5 (2021).
Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Stonestrom, D. A., Prudic, D. E. & Dennehy, K. F. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1577–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01026.x (2005).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrol. Process. 20, 3335–3370. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6335 (2006).
Kelsey, R., Hart, A., Butterfield, H. S. & Vink, D. Groundwater sustainability in the San Joaquin Valley: Multiple benefits if agricultural lands are retired and restored strategically. Calif. Agric. 2, 151–154 (2018).
Capdevila, P. et al. Reconciling resilience across ecological systems, species and subdisciplines. J. Ecol. 109, 3102–3113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13775 (2021).
Thebault, A., Mariotte, P., Lortie, C. & MacDougall, A. Land management trumps the effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on grassland functioning. J. Ecol. 102, 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12236 (2014).
Turney, C., Ausseil, A.-G. & Broadhurst, L. Urgent need for an integrated policy framework for biodiversity loss and climate change. Nature Ecol. Evol. 4, 996–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1242-2 (2020).
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9 (2020).
Ellison, A. M. Foundation species, non-trophic interactions, and the value of being common. iScience 13, 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.020 (2019).
O’Brien, M. J., Carbonell, E. P., Losapio, G., Schlüter, P. M. & Schöb, C. Foundation species promote local adaptation and fine-scale distribution of herbaceous plants. J. Ecol. 109, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13461 (2021).
Bagley, J. E. et al. The influence of land cover on surface energy partitioning and evaporative fraction regimes in the U.S. Southern Great Plains. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 122, 5793–5807. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026740 (2017).
Norris, C., Hobson, P. & Ibisch, P. L. Microclimate and vegetation function as indicators of forest thermodynamic efficiency. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02084.x (2012).
Brooker, R. W. et al. Tiny niches and translocations: The challenge of identifying suitable recipient sites for small and immobile species. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13008 (2018).
Forzieri, G. et al. Increased control of vegetation on global terrestrial energy fluxes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0717-0 (2020).
Milling, C. R. et al. Habitat structure modifies microclimate: An approach for mapping fine-scale thermal refuge. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13008 (2018).
Ghazian, N., Zuliani, M. & Lortie, C. J. Micro-climatic amelioration in a california desert: Artificial shelter versus shrub canopy. J. Ecol. Eng. 21, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/126875 (2020).
Wright, A. J., Barry, K. E., Lortie, C. J. & Callaway, R. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Have our experiments and indices been underestimating the role of facilitation?. J. Ecol. 109, 1962–1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13665 (2021).
Germano, D. J. et al. The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically misunderstood and overlooked. Nat. Areas J. 31, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.031.0206 (2011).
Fairbairn, M., LaChance, J., De Master, K. T. & Ashwood, L. In vino veritas, in aqua lucrum: Farmland investment, environmental uncertainty, and groundwater access in California’s Cuyama Valley. Agric. Hum. Values 38, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10157-y (2021).
Filazzola, A., Lortie, C. J., Westphal, M. F. & Michalet, R. Species-specificity challenges the predictability of facilitation along a regional desert gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12909 (2020).
Cutlar, H. C. Monograph of the North American species of the genus Ephedra. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 26, 373–428 (1939).
Hollander, J. L., Wall, S. B. V. & Baguley, J. G. Evolution of seed dispersal in North American Ephedra. Evol. Ecol. 24, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9309-1 (2010).
Filazzola, A., Brown, C., Westphal, M. & Lortie, C. J. Establishment of a desert foundation species is limited by exotic plants and light but not herbivory or water. Appl. Veg. Sci. 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12515 (2020).
Lortie, C. J., Gruber, E., Filazzola, A., Noble, T. & Westphal, M. The Groot effect: Plant facilitation and desert shrub regrowth following extensive damage. Ecol. Evol. 8, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3671 (2018).
Lortie, C. J. et al. Telemetry of the lizard species Gambelia sila at Carrizo plain national monument. Figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8239667.v2 (2019).
Braun, J., Westphal, M. & Lortie, C. J. The shrub Ephedra californica facilitates arthropod communities along a regional desert climatic gradient. Ecosphere 12, e03760. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3760 (2021).
Terando, A., Youngsteadt, E., Meineke, E. & Prado, S. Accurate near surface air temperature measurements are necessary to gauge large-scale ecological responses to global climate change. Ecol. Evol. 8, 5233–5234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3972 (2018).
Tielborger, K. & Kadmon, R. Indirect effects in a desert plant community: Is competition among annuals more intense under shrub canopies?. Plant Ecol. 150, 53–63 (2000).
Holzapfel, C., Tielbörger, K., Parag, H. A., Kigel, J. & Sternberg, M. Annual plant–shrub interactions along an aridity gradient. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.08.003 (2006).
Jankju, M. Role of nurse shrubs in restoration of an arid rangeland: Effects of microclimate on grass establishment. J. Arid Environ. 89, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.09.008 (2013).
Baldelomar, M., Atala, C. & Molina-Montenegro, M. A. Top-down and Bottom-up effects deployed by a nurse shrub allow facilitating an endemic mediterranean orchid. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 466 (2019).
Tielborger, K. & Kadmon, R. Temporal environmental variation tips the balance between facilitation and interference in desert plants. Ecology 81, 1544–1553. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1544:TEVTTB]2.0.CO;2 (2000).
Walter, J. Effects of changes in soil moisture and precipitation patterns on plant-mediated biotic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0893-4 (2018).
Schob, C., Armas, C. & Pugnaire, F. Direct and indirect interactions co-determine species composition in nurse plant systems. Oikos 122, 1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00390.x (2013).
Eldridge, D. J., Beecham, G. & Grace, J. B. Do shrubs reduce the adverse effects of grazing on soil properties?. Ecohydrology 8, 1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1600 (2015).
Nerlekar, A. N. & Veldman, J. W. High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 18550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922266117 (2020).
Tielbörger, K. et al. Middle-Eastern plant communities tolerate 9 years of drought in a multi-site climate manipulation experiment. Nat. Commun. 5, 5102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6102 (2014).
Griffin, D. & Anchukaitis, K. J. How unusual is the 2012–2014 California drought?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 9017–9023. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062433 (2014).
Data, U. C. In US Climate Data Product, New Cuyama, vol. 1. https://www.usclimatedata.com (2021).
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Effect of interannual precipitation variability on dryland productivity: A global synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14480 (2019).
Ding, Y., Li, Z. & Peng, S. Global analysis of time-lag and -accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 92, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179 (2020).
Liu, H. et al. Analysis of the time-lag effects of climate factors on grassland productivity in Inner Mongolia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 30, e01751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01751 (2021).
Liancourt, P., Song, X., Macek, M., Santrucek, J. & Dolezal, J. Plant’s-eye view of temperature governs elevational distributions. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4094–4103. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15129 (2020).
Ryan, M. J. et al. Too dry for lizards: Short-term rainfall influence on lizard microhabitat use in an experimental rainfall manipulation within a pinon-juniper woodland. Funct. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12595 (2015).
Moore, D., Stow, A. & Kearney, M. R. Under the weather?—The direct effects of climate warming on a threatened desert lizard are mediated by their activity phase and burrow system. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12812 (2018).
Gaudenti, N., Nix, E., Maier, P., Westphal, M. F. & Taylor, E. N. Habitat heterogeneity affects the thermal ecology of an endangered lizard. Ecol. Evol. 11, 14843–14856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8170 (2021).
Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A. & Sotomayor, D. A. Functional assessment of animal interactions with shrub-facilitation complexes: A formal synthesis and conceptual framework. Funct. Ecol. 30, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12530 (2016).
Lortie, C. J. et al. Shrub and vegetation cover predict resource selection use by an endangered species of desert lizard. Sci. Rep. 10, 4884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61880-9 (2020).
De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nature Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0842-1 (2019).
Avolio, M. L. et al. Determinants of community compositional change are equally affected by global change. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1892–1904. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13824 (2021).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01198-0 (2021).
Hedden-Nicely, D. R. Climate change and the future of western US water governance. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01141-3 (2021).
Suggitt, A. J. et al. Extinction risk from climate change is reduced by microclimatic buffering. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0231-9 (2018).
Hanson, R. T., Flint, L. E., Faunt, C. C., Gibbs, D. R. & Schmid, W. Hydrologic models and analysis of water availability in Cuyama Valley, California. In U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2015 1–126 (2015).
John, S. In Encyclopedia of World Climatology (ed John, E. O.) 89–94 (Springer Netherlands, 2005).
James-Jeremy, J. et al. A systems approach to restoring degraded drylands. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12090 (2013).
Upson, J. E. & Worts, G. F. In Ground water in the Cuyama Valley, California. Report No. 1110B 1–82 (1951).
Hanson, M. T., Randall, T. & Sweetkind, D. Cuyama Valley, California hydrologic study—an assessment of water availability. In U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20143075 (2014).
Greicius, T. NASA data show California’s San Joaquin Valley Still Sinking. JPL 28, 1–9 (2017).
Döll, P. et al. Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J. Geodyn. 59–60, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001 (2012).
Lortie, C. J. & Filazzola, A. US climate data, New Cuyama, CA, 2016–2017. Figshare 1, 2016–2017. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17162600.v1 (2021).
Lortie, C. J. & Filazzola, A. Vegetation surveys in Cuyama Valley, CA, USA in 2016 and 2017 at the peak of megadrought. Knowl. Netw. Biocompl. 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5063/F1MG7MZH (2021).
Hickman, J. C. The Jepson Manual (University of California Press, 1996).
Villanueva-Almanza, L. & Fonseca, R. M. In Taxonomic review and geographic distribution of Ephedra (Ephedraceae) in Mexico. ACTA BOTANICA MEXICANA 96 (2011).
Alfieri, F. J. & Mottola, P. M. Seasonal changes in the phloem of Ephedra californica Wats. Bot. Gaz. 144, 240–246 (1983).
Hoffman, O., de-Falco, N., Yizhaq, H. & Boeken, B. Annual plant diversity decreases across scales following widespread ecosystem engineer shrub mortality. J. Veg. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12372 (2016).
Ivey, K. N. et al. Thermal ecology of the federally endangered blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila). Conserv. Physiol. 2020, 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa014 (2020).
Grimes, A. J., Corrigan, G., Germano, D. J. & Smith, P. T. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the endangered blunt-nosed leopard lizard, Gambelia sila. Southwestern Natural. 59, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1894/F06-GC-233.1 (2014).
Stewart, J. A. E. et al. Habitat restoration opportunities, climatic niche contraction, and conservation biogeography in California’s San Joaquin Desert. PLoS ONE 14, e0210766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210766 (2019).
Germano, D. J., Rathbun, G. B. & Saslaw, L. R. Effects of grazing and invasive grasses on desert vertebrates in California. J. Wildl. Manag. 76, 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.316 (2012).
Moss, B. The water framework directive: Total environment or political compromise?. Sci. Total Environ. 400, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.029 (2008).
Denevan, W. M. The "Pristine Myth " revisited. Geogr. Rev. 101, 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00118.x (2011).
da Cunha, A. R. Evaluation of measurement errors of temperature and relative humidity from HOBO data logger under different conditions of exposure to solar radiation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4458-x (2015).
Terando, A. J., Youngsteadt, E., Meineke, E. K. & Prado, S. G. Ad hoc instrumentation methods in ecological studies produce highly biased temperature measurements. Ecol. Evol. 7, 9890–9904. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3499 (2017).
Nature, I. I. U. f. C. o. The IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN 2019-1 1–142 (2019).
Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A., Butterfield, H. S. & Westphal, M. Cuyama Micronet. Figshare 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11888199.v2 (2020).
Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vol. 4.2.1 (R foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Deepayan, S. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. CRAN 3, 1–153 (2021).
Pebesma, E. spacetime: Spatio-temporal data in R. J. Stat. Softw. 1(7), 2012. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v051.i07 (2012).
Bates, D. et al. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. CRAN 2020, 1–122 (2020).
Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated marginal means. CRAN 1, 1–89 (2022).
Acknowledgements
CJL was funded by an NSERC DG, AF by York University, Canada, MW by the BLM, HSB was funded by TNC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.J.L. and A.F. collected and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the writing and interpretation of the evidence.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lortie, C.J., Filazzola, A., Westphal, M. et al. Foundation plant species provide resilience and microclimatic heterogeneity in drylands. Sci Rep 12, 18005 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22579-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22579-1
This article is cited by
-
A realized facilitation cascade mediated by biological soil crusts in a sagebrush steppe community
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Vegetation resilience does not increase consistently with greening in China’s Loess Plateau
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.