Abstract
This study focused on the hydrothermal treatment (HTC) of coal tailings (CT) and coal slurry (CS) and the co-hydrothermal treatment (Co-HTC) of CT, CS and sewage sludge to assess the potential for increasing the carbon content of the hydrochar produced as an enabler for a sustainable carbon economy. The optimal combination methodology and response surface methodology were used to study the relationship between the important process parameters, namely temperature, pressure, residence time, the coal-to-sewage-sludge ratio, and the carbon yield of the produced hydrochar. The optimized conditions for hydrochar from coal tailing (HCT) and hydrochar from coal slurry (HCS) (150 °C, 27 bar, 95 min) increased fixed carbon from 37.31% and 53.02% to 40.31% and 57.69%, respectively, the total carbon content improved from 42.82 to 49.80% and from 61.85 to 66.90% respectively whereas the ash content of coal discards decreased from 40.32% and 24.17% to 38.3% and 20.0% when compared CT and CS respectively. Optimized Co-HTC conditions (208 °C, 22.5bars, and 360 min) for Hydrochar from the blend of coal discards and sewage sludge (HCB) increased the fixed carbon on a dry basis and the total carbon content from 38.67% and 45.64% to 58.82% and 67.0%, when compared CT and CS respectively. Carbonization yields for HCT, HCS, and HCB were, respectively, 113.58%, 102.42%, and 129.88%. HTC and Co-HTC increase the calorific value of CT and CS, to 19.33 MJ/kg, 25.79 MJ/kg, respectively. The results further show that under Co-HTC conditions, the raw biomass undergoes dehydration and decarboxylation, resulting in a decrease in hydrogen from 3.01%, 3.56%, and 3.05% to 2.87%, 2.98%, and 2.75%, and oxygen from 8.79%, 4.78, and 8.2% to 5.83%, 2.75%, and 6.00% in the resulting HCT, HCS, and HCB, respectively. HTC and Co-HTC optimal conditions increased the specific surface area of the feedstock from 6.066 m2/g and 6.37 m2/g to 11.88 m2/g and 14.35 m2/g, for CT and CS, respectively. Total pore volume rose to 0.071 cm3/g from 0.034 cm3/g, 0.048 cm3/g, and 0.09 cm3/g proving the ability of HTC to produce high-quality hydrochar from coal discards alone or in conjunction with sewage sludge as precursors for decontamination of polluted waters, soil decontamination applications, solid combustibles, energy storage, and environmental protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
South Africa (SA), one of the world's leading coal producers, is largely reliant on coal to supply its energy needs1. According to the Department of Energy's 2001 National Coal Discard and Slurry Inventory, about 65 million tons of coal-wastes are produced each year, with the bulk of these wastes being disposed of in tailings piles and slurry dams2. Coal waste disposal is viewed as a serious threat to the country's environmental waste management due to the solubilization of toxic chemicals from coal waste and the possibility of spontaneous combustion3. Beneficiation methods such as physicochemical processes and regeneration techniques have emerged over time, however they are viewed as inefficient, unfriendly to the environment, laborious, and expensive4. However, sewage sludge (SS) is produced in substantial quantities by SA wastewater treatment plants5. The SS contains a variety of organic and inorganic pollutants that are suspected to causing illnesses (asthma, pneumonia) in people who live near disposal stockpiles6. Current SS management methods, such as on-site land disposal and rubbish piling, are considered unsustainable and remains a major issue7. As a result, innovative strategies to coal waste and SS management are deemed necessary. This study focuses on the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) to enhance the physicochemical properties of coal tailing (CT), coal slurry (CS), and a blend of the two coal and SS in order to produce potential carbon precursors for activated carbon, and other valuable carbonaceous materials (value added products). Because it minimizes the need for an energy-intensive dewatering phase, the HTC approach is more environmentally friendly than other typical thermal processes8. HTC is a thermochemical process that uses hot pressurized water as a reactant and catalyst to improve the physicochemical properties of diverse raw materials9. The HTC products consist of a solid termed as hydrochar (HC), a liquid and a small amount of gas by-products9. Previous work on the HTC process assumed that CO2 is the predominant gas (> 95%) emitted during decarboxylation, accompanied by other gases such as CH4, CO, and H2. Under HTC conditions, the majority of the carbon and inorganic components (Ash) from the feedstocks are concentrated in the produced HC, hence reducing the quantity of CO2 released9,10. The HC synthesized is generally a stable aromatic compound with a porous structure and a high hydrophobicity11 level. These features inhibit the further solubilization of inorganic materials (including hazardous components) in the HC when used as adsorbent for water decontamination for instance12. The fuel characteristics of hydrochar produced were successfully enhanced by HTC of low carbon content coal between 150 and 270 °C (HC). Furthermore, HTC of various types of coal has indicated that the high reactivity and non-polar solvent behavior of subcritical water reduced the values of undesirable impurities such as fraction of total ash, oxygen, and sulfur while increasing the carbon content10,11,12. However, there remain a need for further experimental data to corroborate previous works on the HTC of SS or SS combined with other biomasses13. Additionally, previous works indicated that the carbonization and mass yields of different coal-biomass blends were extremely efficient when compared to HTC treatment of individual coal and biomass materials. The Co-HTC process provided acidic conditions that promoted the solubility of the feedstock's mineral content. As a result, when compared to HTC treatment of coal and SS individually, Co-HTC treatment of coals-sewage sludge mixture has a high likelihood of increasing feedstock carbon content10,11,14.
Motivation
In coal beneficiation plants and wastewater treatment plants, the disposal of waste coal and sewage sludge, respectively, presents a significant waste management burden. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is an attractive thermochemical conversion method because it can directly convert moist biomass into energy and chemical products without the need for pretreatment and provides a long-term method for reducing human-caused CO2 emissions by enhancing CO2 immobilization on a durable carbon support. Hydrochar's capacity to generate active carbon precursors for decontamination of polluted waters, soil decontamination applications, solid combustibles, energy storage, and environmental protection has led to its increasing popularity.
Despite the fact that hydrothermal conversion, hydrochar formation mechanisms, and hydrochar properties have been relatively well studied10,13,14, a deeper understanding of the interactions between process parameters related to the hydrothermal conversion of biomass and synthesized hydrochar structural and physicochemical proprieties for various available biomass materials is still necessary to expand hydrochar production and applications. Moreover, these correlations between the hydrothermal process conditions (temperature, heating rate, particle size, substrate concentration, catalyst addition, residence, etc.) and the physicochemical and structural properties of the hydrochar are essential in order to improve conversion. efficiency and provide reference data for industrial design and manufacturing. In addition, the liquid byproduct of hydrothermal conversion (HTC) has received little consideration, despite the necessity for a more in-depth investigation to clarify the relationship between HTC and the synthesis of hydrochar. The aforementioned provides the motivation behind paper.
Experimental method
Materials
Coal tailing (CT) and coal slurry (CS) were collected from a coal beneficiation plant in Mpumalanga, South Africa, for use in this study (Fig. 1). Before use, the samples were kept in an airtight bag in the laboratory and dried at room temperature. The dried samples were screened into various particle sizes in accordance with ASTM D5142 standards for proximal, ultimate, and total sulphur analysis. Sewage Sludge (SS) collected from a wastewater treatment plant [Ekurhuleni Water Care Company (ERWAT)] was split into two portions. The first portion was dried in a laboratory dryer at 105 °C for 24 h and crushed according to ASTM D5142 standards for physiochemical characterization, while the second portion was used for HTC tests in its collected condition.
collected waste coal slurry (A), waste coal tailing (B) and sewage sludge sample (C).
Methods
Hydrothermal (HTC) and co-hydrothermal (Co-HTC) studies were carried out in a high-pressure tube reactor connected to temperature module regulator and water steamer for the heat input. HTC were done on coal tailing (CT) and coal slurry (CS) separately using − 1 mm coal samples, whereas Co-HTC were performed on CD–SS mixes. 25 g of feedstock (coal or mixtures of coal and sewage sludge) was mixed with water as an input solvent in a solid to liquid ratio of 1:4. Design-Expert software (Version 13, State–Ease, Inc, Minneapolis, USA) was used to design the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and co-hydrothermal (HTC) experimental test runs15. According to the design expert matrix, the HTC and Co-HTC process parameters (temperature, pressure, residence time, and CT + CS:SS ratio) were varied. Nitrogen flow was used to keep the reactor in an inert state. After the reaction, the temperature module regulator and steamer were turned off, and the reactor was allowed to cool naturally (cooling time 180 min). To separate the liquid and solid phases, the reactor mixtures were filtered on a GF22μm filter paper disc. Hydrochar coal tailing (HCT), hydrochar coal slurry (HCS), and hydrochar blended coal and SS (HCB) are the solid products collected from HTC and Co-HTC experiments. Both solid samples were dried in an oven at 60 °C for 24 h before being prepared for characterization in accordance with ASTM D5142 standards. The design of experiment response surface methodology (DoE-RSM) technique has widely proved its accuracy in evaluating the combined interaction effects of independent (input) factors on a process16,17. Four hydrothermal process factors were considered in the designs: temperature, pressure, residence time, and the CD:SS (CT + CS:SS) mix ratio. The central composite design (CCD) and the custom design (CD) were used for experimental designs to determine the number of runs necessary to optimize the HTC and Co-HTC processes, respectively. HTC studies were carried out with temperature, pressure, and time changes ranging from 150 to 270 °C, 10 and 27 bar, and 10 and 180 min, respectively. The Co-HTC tests, on the other hand, were carried out with changes in residence time ranging from 10 to 360 min for the same temperature and pressure range used in HTC studies, namely 150–270 °C, 10 and 27 bar, respectively. Co-HTC experiments used a coal feedstock combination (CT + CS) of 50% CT and 50% CS. Response surface methodology (RSM), and the optimum combination methodology (OCM) were used to investigate the effects of the HTC and Co-HTC factors on the fixed carbon of the HC generated from individual CT, CS, and CD–SS mixtures, respectively. Furthermore, RSM and OCM were utilized to construct adequate models for predicting the optimum operating conditions necessary to produce high carbon content hydrochar. To assess the significance of the developed models, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The numerical optimal response approach option was then used to choose the best HTC and Co-HTC process settings, with the greatest fixed carbon (FC) content of the resultant hydrochar serving as the optimization criteria. Finally, the optimal hydrochar (HC) synthesis parameters were established and used to synthesize HCs from hydrothermal and Co-hydrothermal experiments for further physicochemical characterization. Figure 2 summarizes the methodology implemented for the experimental HTC and Co-HTC treatments.
HTC and Co-HTC experimental methodology.
Chemical analyses
Proximate analysis of 1 g of − 212 µm of raw sample and produced hydrochar were carried out using the Thermogravimetric analyser equipment (Leco TGA 701) in accordance with ASTM D5142. The determination of the elemental composition (CHN) of the raw samples and produced hydrochar was done in accordance with ISO 12902 standard method using a Flash 2000 Organic Elemental Analyzer (Thermo Scientific); oxygen was calculated separately as the difference from 100% using Eq. (1).
The mass produced hydrochar mass yield was calculated using Eq. (2).
The carbon densification factors of the produced hydrochar were obtained using the Eq. (3)
The Eq. (4) was used to determine the HTC and Co-HTC carbonization yields (Cy) to assess the degree of carbonization.
Qualitative determination of the mineral phases in the raw material and the produced hydrochar was conducted using D2 PHASER Bruker. The XRD instrument employed Cu-Kα radiation as the excitation source over a 2θ range, and a generator setting of 30 kV and 20 mA. The resulting diffractograms from the XRD analysis were matched on the Bruker D2 mineral phase database to identify the major mineral phases in the samples. The minerals phases were identified using X’PERT High-Score Plus analysis software. The FTIR analysis of raw material and produced hydrochar was conducted on a spectrometer Perkin Elmer instrument coupled with a diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory in the wavenumber range between 4000 and 450 cm−1. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the raw material and produced hydrochar, was done using Carl Zeiss Sigma Field Scanning Electron Microscope connected to the Oxford X-act EDS detector. The analysis was carried out in this procedure according to the operational mode of the equipment. The SEM/EDS analysis settings was on 10 kV and a working distance (WD) of 7.2–8.2 mm using backscattered electrons (BSE) signal. The SEM/EDS analysis provided the surface structure and the homogeneity of the samples18.
The specific surface area and average pore diameter of the raw material and produced hydrochar were determined using nitrogen adsorption test at 77 K. The autosorb iQ gas sorption instrument (Quantachrome Instruments, USA) was used while the Quantachrome® ASiQwinTM software was used for data acquisition and data reduction. Information on the distribution of micropores, mesopores, and macropores was obtained from adsorption data of the N2 isotherm using the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) method. The XRF analysis results of raw materials and produced hydrochar were obtained using the Panalytical AXIOS advanced Analyzer equipped with End-window Rh Xray tube in accordance with the Norrish Fusion technique19. Major elements were fused using Johnson Matthey Spectrolflux 105 at 1000 °C and raw data corrected using in-house software. Standard calibrations were made up using synthetic oxide mixtures and international standard rocks as well as in-house controls.
The produced process water (PW) from the HTC of CT, CS and Co-HTC of CB identified as LCT, LCS and LCB respectively were analyzed for potential environmental disposal assessment. The elemental inorganic and total organic matter concentration of the produced PW were determined by (ICP-OES) using an ICP-OES Agilent technologies spectrophotometer (UPMU-UTM). Prior to sample analysis, interference corrections, instrument performance, instrument detection limit, method limit and linear dynamic range were established. Samples were analyzed according to US EPA 6010 standard. The analysis was based on the ionization of a sample by hot plasma originated from an argon gas. High purity (99.99%) argon was used as plasma, auxiliary and nebulizer gas. The gas flows were kept at 15.0 l/min for plasma, 1.50 l/min for auxiliary and 0.56 l/min for nebulizer. Radio frequency (R.F) power of the plasma generator was 1.35 kW. Vertical height of the plasma was fixed at 7 mm. The charge coupled device (CCD) detector and 21 code of federal regulations (CFR) 11 version 4.1.0 software (for data acquisition) was used to analyze the samples. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined using the 410.4 method of analysis20. The method involves using a strong oxidizing chemical, potassium dichromate Cr2O72−, to oxidize the organic matter in solution for the production of carbon dioxide and water under acidic conditions.
The dissolved organic compounds of the produced PW were determined using the gas chromatograph linked to the mass spectrometer Shimadzu (GCMS-2010) The instrument was set at initial temperature of 140 °C. The initial temperature was held for five minutes then increased at 250 °C using a heating rate of 4 °C /min and maintained for 12.5 min. The samples were injected at 220 °C using the spitless mode. The analysis was performed using the following procedure: sampling time: 1.00 min; flow control mode: pressure: 100.00 kPa, total flow: 50.00 ml/min; column flow: 1.13 ml/min; linear velocity: 3.00 ml/min. The identification of the organic compounds in the PW was conducted using the NIST 14 database and compared with published mass spectra.
The total organic carbon content (TOC) of the produced PW were estimated using a chromatographic method on the Thermo-Scientific Flash elemental analyzer (TSF EA 1112) according to NF EN 15936:2013 standard. The Flash EA 1112 is based on the well-known Flash Dynamic Combustion method, which produces complete combustion of the sample within a high temperature reactor, followed by an accurate and precise determination of the elemental gases produced using a TCD thermal conductivity detector. The sample combustion temperature was 950 °C. The TOC content determination starts with the elimination of all inorganic carbons in the form of carbon dioxide by the effect of acidification of the sample with a small volume of phosphoric acid in special container. The liquid phase produced was dried at a temperature lower than 40 °C, and the special container was then closed and loaded into the auto sampler carousel for analysis. The sample quantity (100 ml) was chosen in such a way that the carbon dioxide released during combustion was in the analyzer working range. For Thermo Scientific Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer calibration, calcium carbonate reference material was used. The value obtained after analysis is the sum of both inorganic and organic carbon in the PW or Total Carbon (TC). The following equations were used to calculate TOC of the produced PW
where TIC represents the total inorganic carbon of the PW obtained from the coulometer reading.
Results and discussion
Samples characterization
The physicochemical analysis of coals and sewage sludge samples was performed using proximate, ultimate, and total sulphur analysis to determine the quality and elemental composition of the samples. The results showed in Table 1 are reported on air dry basis.
The inherent moisture content of SS was found to be higher than that of CT and CS due to the nature of the sample, the process by which it was generated, and particle size distribution attributes. The CS sample has higher FC (50.98%) than the CT sample (35.75%), and SS (8.75%). Thermal treatment was required to improve the total carbon content of SS for future uses. As a result, the HTC method could improve the FC grade of the raw materials, resulting in improved porous structure properties of the produced HCs. The raw samples' ash concentration varied from 38.64 to 36.07% to 23.22% for CT, SS, and CS, respectively. The quantity of ash in the coal samples designates them as high and moderately high ash content coal (Standard South Africa ISO11760, 2005 E). This is consistent with the fact that all of the coal samples used in this study are byproducts of the coal beneficiation process.
The results from XRD analysis of raw materials are showed in Fig. 3. The observation and analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns of the coal samples revealed a predominance of crystalline mineral phases represented by intense peaks21. The findings indicate that mineral phases such as quartz, kaolinite, muscovite, orthoclase anorthite, hematite, chlinochlore, moganite, calcite, siderite, and pyrite dominated the composition of raw samples. A significant hump was noticed on the X-ray diffraction pattern of the CS sample compared to the CT pattern, indicating the presence of more organic components in the CS sample. The intensity of the peaks decreased from quartz, kaolinite, muscovite, orthoclase, and pyrite, reflecting the falling quantity of each phase. The CT sample shows more mineral phase peaks than the CS and SS samples. The cause might be related to the findings of proximate and petrographic examination, which revealed excessive ash and mineral matter levels in the CT, CS, and SS samples, respectively. The intensity of quartz peak in SS revealed its predominance. The results of analysis showed the pyrite sulphur mineral phase present in the two coal samples and corresponded to same position 2θ peaks. The organic hump showed a relatively less intensity in the CS sample and much less in the CS sample which corresponded to quantity of amorphous material in the samples22.
Raw samples XRD pattern. Clay Mineral phases; K (Kaolinite); Silicate mineral; M (Muscovite), AN (Anorthite), Q (Quartz), MO (Moganite), O(Orthoclase) Oxide mineral; H (Hematite), Sulphur mineral; P (Pyrite), Carbonate mineral; S (Siderite), C (Calcite); Chlorite mineral; CL ((Clinochlore).
The results of Fourier transform infrared analysis are presented in Fig. 4. The spectrums of raw samples present functional groups absorption peaks at corresponding wavelength. The analysis of the spectrums in absorption band between 3650 and 3250 cm−1 revealed the peaks at 3620 cm−1 for both waste coal samples showing the presence of hydrogen bond. The peaks confirm the existence of hydroxyl compound because the two spectrums contain also peaks at wavelength of 1595.25, 1029.70, 1006.19, 750.58, 691.44 cm−1 and 1031.34, 1008.62, 749.39 cm−1 for CT and CS sample respectively. The sharp intensity absorption in the absorption band range between 3670 and 3550 cm−1 show the presence of oxygen related group (alcohol or phenol). The absorption peaks observed at 1595.25 cm−1 wavelength revealed the presence of double bound carbonyl group combined with another double bound (aromatic stretch). The aromatic stretches groups reduce the intensity of carbonyl groups absorption band. The region comprised between the 1450 and 450 cm−1 wavelength has been found to be specific for each coal sample and is the fingerprint region of the two coal samples. Multiple band absorption groups were observed at wavelength of 1029.7, 1006.19 and 911.92 cm−1 on the CT spectrum and 1031.34, 1008.62 and 913.12 cm−1 on the CS spectrum. Vinyl-related compound corresponded to the absorption peaks at 911.92 and 913.12 cm−1 coal spectrums. Orto-aromatic groups was reported at wavelength of 750.58 and 749.39 cm−1 on the CT and CS spectrums respectively. The intense absorption peaks at wavelength of 1006.19, 465.61 cm−1 on the CT and 1008.69, 467.25 cm−1 on the CS spectrums revealed the presence of silica asymmetric stretch (Si–O–Si). The intensity of the peaks showed that the concentration of silica compound is higher in the CT sample compared to CS and SS samples. This is consistent with the results from XRD and proximate analysis. The absorption peaks at wavelength of 691.44 cm−1 on the CT spectrum showed the presence of monosubstituted alkynes, alkenes groups (C–H), primary and secondary amine groups (NH2, N–H). The absorption bands identified at 465.72 cm−1 wavelength in the SS sample revealed the presence mineral matter in the fingerprint region of the spectrum which was followed by an adsorption band at 1032.44 cm−1 showing the presence of amine, phosphate, sulfoxide, and halogenated groups. The carbonyl group with unsaturated bond has been identified at a wavelength of 1634.41 cm−1 on the sewage sludge spectrum. The aliphatic group identified at wavenumber 2922.63 cm−1 on the sewage sludge spectrum revealed the presence of long linear chains.
FTIR spectrum of raw samples.
The results of XRF analysis are presented in Table 2. These results revealed the predominance of silicon (Si) and aluminum in the raw samples used. The highest percentages of silicon and aluminum have been found into the CT (17.021%Si and 7.14%Al) followed by the SS (11.43%Si and 5.94%Al) and CS (6.89% Si and 4.48%Al) respectively. The ferrous compounds were more indicated in the SS (5.97% Fe) compared to CT (3.31%Fe) and CS which contains a lowest percentage (1.21% Fe). Moreover, it has been observed that the CT contains high calcium (5.1% Ca) followed by SS (2.7% Ca) and CS (1.72% Ca). Those are predominant mineral’s elements present in the raw materials used. However, the analysis revealed that the samples of materials used contained also traces of some other elements such as magnesium, sodium, titanium, phosphorus, chromium manganese and nickel as shown in Table 2.
The XRF results confirmed the results of precedents analysis which revealed the high content of mineral (ash) in the CT followed by SS and CS respectively. Therefore, to reduce the percentage of mineral content in the raw material, the HTC process was used to dissolve a fraction of elements via hydrolysis for the increase of carbon content.
HTC process results
Tables 3 and 4 show the FC, A, and VM of the HC synthesized from HTC of CT and CS with a solid/liquid ratio of 1/4. The results suggest that the reaction temperature, and pressure had the greatest impact on the HTC experimental procedure, which is consistent with other works22,23. However, raising the temperature from 150 to 270 °C lowered the FC content of the synthesized HC i.e. after 10 min of reaction, the greatest FC grades (40.37% and 57.69%) were achieved at 150 °C with a matching pressure of 10 bar. Additionally, the SS and CD samples were mixed to produce an HC with high carbon content and porous structure. The goal was to assess the combination of these three forms of waste materials in a predetermined proportion to enhance the hydrochar synthesised. Though, some researchers have undertaken studies on the HTC of SS24,25, none of them have documented systematically the physicochemical properties of the products resulting from the blending of SS and CD in the HTC process. Preliminary results in Table 5 indicate that using SS in combination with CD enhance the hydrochar synthesised as the FC content of the HCs synthesised increases. This may be due to the presence of acid functional groups in the SS sample as indicated in Fig. 2. These acid functional groups i.e., phosphate, amine, and sulfoxide play an important role in the dissolving of mineral materials in coal samples during the HTC process. This is congruent with other findings that indicated that the presence of acid promotes HC synthesis during the HTC process by altering the proportionality of produced phases26. As a result, the carbon content of the generated HC rises, which improves its physical properties while decreasing the atomic ratios of O/C and H/C14. Table 5 show the influence of temperature, pressure, and residence time on the ash content, fixed carbon, and volatile matter of the hydrochar (HCs) synthesised in this study using coal discards (CD) and sewage sludge (SS).
Optimal HTC parameters were found considering the physicochemical data of the HC produced i.e., the optimized HC should have the maximum fixed carbon content and the lowest ash content and volatile substances. Surface response approach was used to develop linear and quadratic models.
The statistical parameters were evaluated using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the HTC and Co-HTC experimental results obtained from proximate analysis presented in Tables 3, 4 and 5. The regression models (Eqs. 5–7) obtained for HTC and Co-HTC using RSM and CD were used to evaluate the influence of HTC and Co-HTC factors on the FC of the produced hydrochar (HCs). In addition, these regression models were tested using the probability (p value) and Fischer test values (F-value) for the obtained responses. All models were found statistically significant due to high F-value and lower p value16,27. The FC models for HCT and HCS were observed as a good fit, (R2 = 0.9517, R2 = 0.8430 respectively at p value < 0.0001) and are represented by Eqs. (5) and (6) respectively. In addition, FC model of produced HCB was established as a good fit, (R2 0.8434 at p value < 0.0001) and is represented by Eq. (7).
The negative coefficient of the input variables indicates its antagonistic effect of on the FC value of the produced HC. The synergetic effect of the output responses was revealed by the positive coefficients within the equations28. The effect of operating conditions on the FC of the produced hydrochar (HC) was illustrated by the 3D plot of the response surface (Figs. 5, 6 and 7).
Surface plot showing the influence of temperature and pressure on fixed carbon (left) and Ash content (right) of Coal tailing’s HC.
Surface plot showing the influence of temperature and pressure on fixed carbon (left) and Ash content (right) of Coal slurry’s HC.
Surface plot showing the influence of temperature and pressure on fixed carbon (left) and Ash content (right) of the mixture of Sewage sludge and Coals.
Optimum operating conditions
The analysis and evaluation of obtained data were completed by the optimization of the input and responses factors (Table 9). The objective was to evaluate the input factors for the maximization of FC for the produced HCs. The input factors ranged from 150 °C, 10 bar and 10 min as lower limits to 270 °C and 27 bar, 180 min as upper limits of yielded optimization solutions for HTC process. On the other hand, the Co-HTC yielded optimization solutions were determined using input factors ranged from 150 °C, 10 bar, 10 min and 0:25 g (CT + CS:SS) as lower limits and 270 °C, 27 bar, 360 min and 25:0 g (CT + CS:SS) as upper limits. Using the desirability function, the conditions that provided the maximum desirability factor was chosen as the optimum process parameters. The results presented in Tables 3, 4 and 5 show that 150 °C, 27 bar and 92.13 min were optimum HTC conditions, while 208 °C, 22.5 bar, 331 min and 20.02:4.98(CT + CS:SS) were optimum conditions for the Co-HTC process. The error percentages found are presented in Table 6 and show that the optimized results were consistent compared to the experimental measurement.
The comparison of the conditions used in this work with the HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions of different feedstock utilized in previous show that the Co-HTC process has a significant carbonization potential to produce HCB comparable to HCB obtained from other feedstocks reported in literature9,12,14. Furthermore, the conditions selected in this study could reduce the energy need and the cost of the process from the development and economic feasibility perspectives compared to reported operations conditions used for other thermal process such as pyrolysis and gasification16.
Post analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of the model using optimum parameters as confirmation points (Table 6). Post experiment results with fixed carbon (FC) of 40.19%, 57.19% and 58.88% content for HCT, HCS and HCB respectively were used to validate the regression models. The predicted means were compared to the medians using the regression models and the standard deviations and standard errors obtained were in acceptable range (< 2%). This further confirms that the models developed were valid and could be used to predict the FC of the produced hydrochar29.
Characterization of the synthesised hydrochar
The proximate analysis results of raw materials and produced hydrochar (HC) from hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and Co-hydrothermal carbonization (Co-HTC) at optimum conditions are presented in Table 7. The results show that the FC content of the raw samples increased through HTC and Co-HTC process as presented in Table 7. The HTC and Co-HTC process present an opportunity to upgrade the FC content of raw materials through the release of mineral matter, oxygen, and sulphur content from their molecular structures30. The HTC and Co-HTC optimum conditions maintained the water at a liquid state and favoured the hydrolysis of aliphatic components, dissolution of minerals matter and prevent the escaping of the carboxylate’s gas. The change in FC of coals-sewage sludge blend (CB) after Co-HTC process was greater compared to the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of coal tailing (CT) and coal slurry (CS) individually as shown in Table 7. This may be due to the increase of acidic conditions produced from the decomposition of cellulose, chlorine, and hemicellulose constituents of the sewage sludge into organic acid monomers during decarboxylation and dehydration reactions of Co-HTC process31. As a consequence, the lower pH of Co-HTC process liquid increases the sulphur removal (formation of sulphite and sulphate) and allows the inorganic elements to be released into the liquid phase12,32. This eventually led to a reduction of the ash content present in the feedstock and increases the FC of the produced hydrochar. However, the increase of temperature above the 150 °C and 208 °C for HTC and Co-HTC respectively (Tables 3, 4 and 5) proportionally increases the ash content of the produced HC due to the condensation of components dissolved in the solid hydrochar and liquefaction of carbon from the feedstock33. The results presented in Table 7 show that Co-HTC products had significantly lower ash content than the feedstock used, produced HCT and HCS respectively. The higher decrease in mass yield observed from the HCB compared to the HCT and HCS can be attributed to the increased decomposition of the blend feedstock occurring under Co-HTC conditions34. The further increase in temperature severity of the HTC and Co-HTC (respectively above 150 °C and 208 °C) operating conditions leads to a higher degree of thermolytic decomposition, fragmentation, and solubilisation of macromolecules (coals, biomass, etc.) resulting in decreasing mass yield35. The high CD:SS mass ratio maintained higher mass yield of the produced hydrochar from Co-HTC process possibly due to the hydrothermal stability of the coal compared to the SS12. However, excess of coal leads to agglomeration and stability of mineral matter content in the reaction medium and reduces the formation of acidic mild condition which negatively affects the carbonization yield by decreasing the FC content of the produced HCB (Table 5).
The HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions considerably modified the elemental compositions of the HCT, HCS and HCB produced from CT, CS and CB respectively (Table 7). At optimum conditions, much of the atomic carbon content from the feedstock appear to remain retained in the solid HC produced showing the potential of sequestration and repolymerization of HTC and Co-HTC process36. The increase in total carbon content in the produced HC corresponds to the decrease in the hydrogen, oxygen, and total sulphur content (Table 7). The decrease of sulphur content in the produced hydrochar, possibly also contributes to the liberalization of pores and improve the textural structure as demonstrated in previous studies16,37. The carbon densification factors for the HCT, HCS and HCB, were higher than 1 in all cases and were consistent with the values reported in previous studies on HTC and Co-HTC process and showed the evidence of carbonization12. HTC and Co-HTC carbonization yields (Cy) were determined to evaluate the degree of carbonization. The results obtained show that carbonization yields (Cy) of 96.13%, 93.82% and 96.03% for HCT, HCS and HCB respectively which were consistent with previous results on HTC of sub-bituminous coal and Co-HTC of coal and biomass12. The results also show that nitrogen increased slightly possibly due to the stagnation of nitrogen under HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions, and the utilization of nitrogen gas inlet to maintain the inert medium. The sulphur content of the HCB (0.39%) was lower compared to the sulphur content of the feedstocks, HTC and HCS respectively, demonstrating the efficiency of Co-HTC process for synergetic sulphur content reduction in coals and biomass. The elemental composition changes implied the structural changes of the produced HCT, HCS and HCB38.
The atomic ratios of H/C and O/C were determined from elemental compositions (Table 7) and evaluated using the plot of Van Krevelen diagram, as shown in Fig. 8. The atomic ratios plots show that the raw materials shifted from up to down and from the right to the left, demonstrating the progression of carbonisation process and the effects of HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions on the carbonisation degree. The observation of the Fig. 8 implies that the HTC and Co-HTC processes may be driven by a succession of dehydration, and decarboxylation reactions causing the decrease of H/C and O/C atomic ratios respectively. The material representative point closer to the origin indicates a higher carbon content. The CT and CS were found close to the origin compared to the SS, as coal discards have higher carbon content. The produced hydrochar points are lower and further toward the left showing the decrease of hydrogen and oxygen content. Figure 8 further shows that the feedstock possibly undergoes dehydration as primary reaction followed by decarboxylation during HTC and Co-HTC process. The carbon content of the CB increases by 46.88%, while hydrogen and oxygen decrease by 8.85% and 25.85% respectively. This may be attributed to the loss of hydroxyl groups as shown in Fig. 3 possibly supporting the evidence that the dehydration reaction trend for HTC and Co-HTC ending with condensation of carboxylates created during decarboxylation reaction to produce a hydrophobic restructured carbonaceous material12 as shown in Fig. 8.
Van-Krevelen diagram for untreated, HTC, and Co-HTC hydrochar.
Figure 9 presents the overall experimental mass balance of HTC and Co-HTC for this work. These results show that after thermochemical decomposition of CT, CS and CB, the major carbon content of the feedstock ends in the restructured and condensed HCs (aromatic polymer). This is consistent with previous studies that described the overall HTC products as primarily consisting of acetic acid, methanol, carbon dioxide, and a solid hydrochar12, and that the overall thermal decomposition during HTC could be represented by the reaction (1), where the chemical composition of the HTC solid products is estimated in terms of C, H, and O deduced from elemental compositions, as shown in Table 7.
HTC, and Co-HTC process mass balance.
In this reaction, the solid HC is noted CmHnO, the liquid phase was assumed to be composed by CH3COOH and CH3OH produced after the hydrolysis, decarboxylation and demethanation when methane and carboxylates ions reacted in aqueous phase12,34,36.
The overall theoretical HTC mass balance represented by the combined reactions (2)–(4):
The diffractogram presented in Fig. 10A shows XRD results of the CT, CS, SS and produced HCs samples which show that CT and CS have broad peaks corresponding to coal patterns rich in amorphous phases while the SS presented a predominant crystal lattice39. The amorphous hump observed on the XRD pattern of CS reveals its high content in organic matter compared to CT39,40,41. The mineral phases identified and labelled accordingly on the diffraction patterns presented on Fig. 10A are; Clays: K (Kaolinite); Silicates: M (Muscovite), A (Anorthite), Q (Quartz), MO (Moganite), O (Orthoclase); Carbonates: S (Siderite), C (Calcite); Oxide: H (Hematite); Sulphurs: P (Pyrite), and Chlorite: CL (Clinochlore). The mineral phase identification indicate that silicates ([SiO(4−x)]n) and aluminosilicates (KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2) (clay) minerals are present in significant proportion in the CT and CS while the predominant mineral phases in the SS are quartz (SiO2) and clinochlore ((Mg, Fe(2+)5Al2Si3O10(OH)8), showing the trigonal, hexagonal, triclinic and monoclinique, crystal systems of the three materials respectively42. The diffraction patterns of the mixtures of the three materials CB revealed an interaction between minerals phases resulting in change of structure (orthorhombic) and peaks intensity43. The decrease of peaks intensities of mineral phases observed in the diffraction patterns of the produced hydrochar followed the HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions effect on the possible the dissolution of mineral content of the feedstock. Figure 8 also indicate a significant decrease of mineral phases peak’s intensities for Co-HTC process which may be due to the decomposition of SS into organic acid monomers during decarboxylation and dehydration reactions as also shown in Fig. 8. The organic humps become intense and broader around 20° 2θ in the HCB diffractogram (Fig. 10A). Previous works attributed these formations of hump on XRD diffractogram to the progressive transformation of crystalline structure into amorphous structure. That has been corroborated in previous studies which showed that the condensation and polymerisation of carboxyl and carbonyl groups produced from decarboxylation during HTC and Co-HTC forms an amorphous hydrophobic aromatic polymer44,45. These may explain the observed residual intense peaks on the HCT and HCS from the CT and CS respectively, showing higher degree of crystallinity compared to HCB.
XRD patterns of coal, sewage sludge and produced hydrochar (A) and FTIR spectra of coals, sewage sludge and produced hydrochar (B).
The FTIR spectra (Fig. 10B) were used to describe the chemical structural properties of the raw materials and produced hydrochar. The peaks at 3620 cm−1 band were attributed to O–H stretching vibration linked with kaolinite mineral phase presented on the XRD patterns in the form of silanol (Si–OH). The Si–OH groups are instable due to the polarization in aqueous medium (anionic charge) during HTC and Co-HTC process. Hence, water is eliminated and weakens the Si–O back bonds to generate –Si–H and new Si–OH bonds as seen on Fig. 10B46. The lower intensity of the O–H observed on the spectrum band of the produced hydrochar compared to untreated coals demonstrated the evidence of dehydration reactions during HTC and Co-HTC process resulting in the release of hydroxyl groups in liquid phase which form water (Eqs. 1 and 2) and as also suggested by the van krevelen plot (Fig. 8). The intense peak at 2922.63 cm−1 band was due to higher presence of aliphatic group in the SS characterized by long linear chains –CH2 and –CH3 asymmetric and symmetric vibrations(alkanes) respectively47. The shoulder peaks at 2960 cm−1 band observed on the HCT and HCB spectra were assigned to asymmetric aliphatic –CH3 stretching vibration48. The increase of peaks intensity of the C–H aliphatic stretch observed at 2850 cm−1 and 2920 cm−1 from CT and CS spectrums may be due to the interaction between C–H alkyl groups14,47,48. The peak observed at 1700 cm−1 band was attributed to the aliphatic C=O and –COOH stretching vibrations of carboxyl and carbonyls, mainly ketones, aldehydes, and esters in the SS47. At 1600 cm−1 bands, corresponding to the aromatic C=C structure, HCS possesses the strongest peak intensity followed by HCB, CS, CB, HCT, CT and SS. It has been argued that a strong transmittance peak at 1600 cm−1 wavelength indicates a high carbon content present in the material analysed validating the presence of lignin49. This explanation is consistent with the distribution of total carbon content obtained from ultimate analysis of materials presented in Table 7. The peaks observed at 1595.25 cm−1 wavelength indicated the presence of double bound carbonyl groups (C=O) combined with aromatic stretch confirming the presence of cellulose50. The intensity of C=O peaks of the produced hydrochar was clearly weak compared to the feedstock. This is possibly an indication of the decarboxylation reaction occurring during HTC and Co-HTC process as described by Eq. 3. The peaks at 1391 and 1240 cm−1 band were identified in the CT, CS and CB but not in the SS. These peaks were attributed to the symmetric deformation associated with the –CH3 groups and phenol51. The peaks observed at 1250 cm−1 revealed the saturated aliphatic skeletal C–C vibrations51,52. The transmittance peak within the fingerprint region of the spectrum at 1030 and 570 cm−1 band in all spectra with decreasing intensity from CT, SS, CS, CB, HCS, HCT to HCB were assigned to the vibrations associated with Si–O–Si in quartz and kaolinite53. Multiple peaks observed between 900 and 800 cm−1 not appearing in the SS were assigned to aromatic species in aromatic rings; trans- and cis-CH2 in long saturated aromatic –CH–CH chains, C–O stretching vibration of ether groups; O–H bending vibrations in phenolic, phenoxy and hydroxybenzene structures and were mostly observed with strong intensity in the feedstock compared to produced hydrochar. This may be due to the condensation and polymerization reactions occurring in HTC and Co-HTC processes resulting in elimination of the oxygen and hydrogen into water in liquid phases and restructuration of the carbon skeleton54. This is also supported by elemental analyses (Table 7) which show the decrease of oxygen content from the feedstock to the produced hydrochar with HCB is the most oxidized product obtained due to the decomposition of cellulose49,50. The peaks at 866 cm−1, 805 cm−1, and 745 cm−1 bands revealed the presence of aromatic nucleus –CH bending vibrations in the coals, the CB, and the HCB47,51. Hence, HTC and Co-HTC can be characterized as thermochemical process driven by dehydration (Reaction 5 and 6), decarboxylation (Reaction 7), and demethanation (Reactions 8 and 9)13.
where R represents the remainder of a cellulose or lignin molecule to which the reacting groups are attached.
Additionally, the surface structural arrangement of feedstocks and produced HC were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figures 11, 12 and 13 reveal that the physicochemical properties of the feedstock were vastly impacted by HTC and Co-HTC optimum conditions. The element spectrums of the produced HC displayed the predominance of carbon confirmed by higher peaks. The reduction (Si, O and Fe) and disappearance (Al, Mg and Na) of peaks on the spectrums from the feedstocks to the produced HC were proportional to the decrease of elemental mineral composing the ash content under HTC and Co-HTC conditions55. This correlates with the proximate and elemental analyses. The SEM image of CB (Fig. 13a) shows aggregating particles identified as SS on the coal surface, which is supported by the presence of carbon, oxygen, silica, and aluminium peaks on the element spectrum of the selected region. Thus, coal served as a reaction site for sewage sludge particles, which interacted and favoured complete mixing of the feedstock during Co-HTC, resulting in surface homogenisation of the produced hydrochar (Fig. 13c). Furthermore, the SEM images of the feedstock and produced hydrochar revealed a hydrothermal-induced rearrangement from rough and irregular morphology in the raw materials (Figs. 11a, 12a, 13a) to well distributed porous morphology in the produced hydrochar (Figs. 11c, 12c, 13c). Images of the produced hydrochar indicated spotting features and the formation of microstructural pores. These properties provided potential absorbent properties for the hydrochar produced56. The thermolytic effect of HTC and Co-HTC temperature increase on the feedstock generates pores in the material structure through the release of hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, and the degree of mineral content dissolution. This is in accordance with other results that demonstrated that the process severity conditions affect the thermolytic decomposition, devolatilization reaction characteristics, and porous structure formation of HTC and Co-HTC12,57. Hydrochar has smoother and more homogeneous surface morphologies than feedstock. The pores size uniformity on the surface images of produced hydrochar show a difference in the degree of mineral dissolution for HTC (Figs. 11a and 12a) and Co-HTC (Fig. 13a) caused by an increase in acidic mild conditions12,57. The surface morphology of the produced hydrochar obtained from SEM favoured the evaluation of microstructural changes of the coals and the mixture coal-sewage sludge after HTC (Figs. 11a and 12a) and Co-HTC (Fig. 13a) process respectively.
SEM images (A,C) and EDX elemental spectrums (B,D) of coal tailing (up), and coal tailing’s hydrochar (down).
SEM images (A,C) and EDX elemental spectrums (B,D) of coal slurry (up), and coal slurry’s hydrochar (down).
SEM images (A,C) and EDX elemental spectrums (B,D) of the mixture of coals and sewage sludge blended in optimized ratio (1CT + 1CS:0.4SS) (up), and the Co-HTC produced hydrochar (HCB) (down).
The isotherms of nitrogen adsorption of the feedstocks and produced hydrochar are presented in Fig. 14 and were categorized as type III isotherms according to IUPAC isotherm plots classification (lateral interactions between adsorbed molecules are strong in comparison to interactions between the adsorbent surface and adsorbate)58. These isotherms show the volume of nitrogen adsorbed at lower P/Po and displayed folds followed by loops revealing the development of mesopores created by the devolatilization and sulphur release under HTC and Co-HTC conditions59
Isothermal adsorption plots of and Co-HTC hydrochar.
The coal slurry’s hydrochar pore diameter was larger than the CT and produced HCT which decreases the nitrogen storage capacity as seen on the limit relative pressure of the associated isotherm loop60. The HCB isotherm show that the Co-HTC conditions allowed the SS (biomass) to settle on the coal surface, adsorb, and form a rudimentary layer resulting in a reduced pore diameter obtained (Fig. 14). The aggregation of SS particles observed on SEM images of CB contributes to the formation of narrowed pores of the produced HCB which increases the nitrogen adsorption observed on the associated isotherm from the relative pressure of 0.8 and upward12,60. The description of porous materials internal structure is done by the determination of pore size distribution analysis using a simplified model determined as follow61.
where W is pore width and V is the pore volume.
The average pore diameters of CD, SS and produced HCs are presented in Table 8. The obtained results show a unimodal distribution referring to the presence of pores in the mesopores region (2 nm > pore diameter < 50 nm)61. The average pore diameters of the produced HC confirm (Table 8) the development of mesopores provoked by HTC and Co-HTC consistent with the pores size distribution of hydrochar and biochar materials produced in previous studies59,61.
The XRF results presented in Table 9 show the predominance of Silicon (Si), Aluminum (Al), Iron (Fe), Magnesium (Mg), Manganese (Mn) and Calcium (Ca) in the raw materials (CT, CS, SS) analyzed. Thus, in agreement with the XRD analysis which identified the dominant presence of silicates (quartz, muscovite, orthose) and clay or aluminosilicates (kaolinite) minerals followed by pyrite, calcite, hematite, clinochlore and siderite. The decrease of mineral element in the ash of CT, CS and CB after HTC and Co-HTC respectively as shown in Table 9 is proportional to the reduction of mineral phases peaks intensity observed in Fig. 10A. This may be due to the release of mineral element into the HTC and Co-HTC liquid phases62,63. Previous studies have shown that in acidic medium silicates mineral dissolve via multi-step process initiates by rapid exchange of cations at the mineral surface, followed by hydrolysis and subsequent detachment of silica and alumina component from the remaining carbon skeleton64. This is in agreement with the FTIR results in Fig. 10B where the release of –OH groups was observed on the spectra of the produced hydrochar. As a result, under acidic conditions produced by HTC and Co-HTC, silicates and aluminosilicates minerals are decomposed by metal and silica dissolution, whereas the carbon skeleton accuses a smaller decomposition before condensation and repolymerization14,61. Therefore, the decarboxylation that occur during HTC and Co-HTC, lead to a breakdown of C=O and –COOH identified in the feedstock spectra, producing organic acids in the aqueous system. This decreases the pH and subsequently causes a partial dissolution of mineral elements. The lower pH medium produced by the decomposition of extended aliphatic groups combined to double bound carbonyl groups (C=O) present in SS under Co-HTC enhance the dissolution of minerals. As a consequence, the mineral elemental composition in the produced hydrochar decrease significantly (HCB). The analysis of liquid phases from HTC (LCT, LCS) and Co-HTC (LCB) indicate the amount of metal dissolved following each process. Consequently, the XRF results presented in Table 9 indicate a decrease in the major mineral elements present in CB, CT, and CS, respectively. As shown in Table 9, minor elements such as Potassium (K), Sodium (Na), Titanium (Ti), Manganese (Mn), Phosphorus (P), Chromium (Cr), and Nickel (Ni) decreased and in some cases disappeared from the produced hydrochar. The XRF results (Table 9) shows the comparative mineral dissolution evaluation of Co-HTC and HTC. Table 9 shows that the majority of the mineral components identified in the feedstocks were present in relatively stable form in the synthesized HCs, as determined by XRF. Therefore, the adsorption application of synthesized HCs for decontamination of polluted waters or environmental remediation is unlikely to be able to separate the stable element mineral complexes of the HCs back into the environment. The increase in LOI is consistent with previous findings that determined that the increase in LOI in carbonaceous material corresponds to the increase in its organic matter, which contains carbon65. The results show that the blended treatment of CT, CS, and SS in Co-HTC results in a higher carbonization yield (%) than HTC of CT and CS alone.
As shown in Table 10, the optimized operating conditions obtained in this study were relatively lower than HTC and Co-HTC operating conditions of various feedstock used in previous studies. The carbon content of the HCs generated in this study was comparable to that of the HCs listed in Table 10. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the Co-HTC process has a significant carbonization potential (high carbon content) to produce hydrochar from the combination of coal discard and sewage sludge (HCB), comparable to HCB produced from other feedstock as reported in previous studies. In addition, the conditions selected in this study have the potential to reduce the energy requirement and cost of the process from a development and economic feasibility standpoint, when compared to the reported operating conditions for other thermal processes, such as pyrolysis and gasification16.
Characterization of the HTC process water
The concentration of inorganic elements in produced PW provides information about its treatment prior to discharge or use. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) is the amount of oxygen required to completely oxidize organic carbon to CO2 and H2O66. The COD is an important water quality parameter because, like the BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), it provides an index to assess the impact of discharged wastewater on the receiving environment20,66. Higher COD levels indicate a greater amount of oxidizable organic material in the sample, which reduces dissolved oxygen (DO) levels. A decrease in DO can cause anaerobic conditions, which are harmful to higher aquatic life forms67,68. According to a recent study, the produced PW from HTC of different feedstock had a relatively low concentration of inorganic and organic elements when compared to the standard for environmental disposal69.
The results presented in Fig. 15 show different element dissolved in the liquid phases after HTC and Co-HTC process. The most abundant elements found in the produced PW were calcium (Ca) > silicon (Si) > nitrogen(N) > phosphorous (P) > Nickel (Ni) > Magnesium (Mg) > cadmium (Cd) > chromium (Cr) > Manganese (Mn). The other elements such as zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and mercury (Hg) were at lower levels. The absence of the iron (Fe) and sodium (Na) in the analyzed PW indicates that all the Fe and Na content of the raw materials have been retained in the produced hydrochar70. The high concentrations of inorganic contaminants and lower pH was observed from the produced LCB compared to LCT and LCS. Thus, confirmed the increased degree of mineral dissolution during Co-HTC due to the decomposition of sewage sludge which produced acidic medium31. In addition, according to the standard for the discharge of the PW into the fresh waterbodies, the concentrations of Nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), Zinc (Zn), Nickel (Ni) and silicon (Si) approached or exceed the legal limits71.The concentration of organic matter in the produced PW revealed the decomposition of organic elements from feedstock under HTC and Co-HTC conditions49,50. The concentration of organic matter in the LCB illustrated the complexity of thermal decomposition reactions, interactions between coals and SS which resulted in the fragmentation, and solubilization of carbon macromolecules50. The results presented in Fig. 15 show that COD of the produced LCB estimated from organic matter obtained by ICP-OES analysis exceeds the special limit (special limit 30 mg/l) for discharge to fresh waterbodies. The general and special standard limit of elements dissolved in water refer to the maximum concentrations of the elements stated in water used for irrigation and aquatic discharge respectively72.
ICP-OES analysis results of LCT: HTC liquid phase from Coal tailing; LCS: HTC liquid phase from coal slurry and LCB: HTC liquid phase from the blending of coal and sewage sludge.
Identification of organic compounds
The GC–MS results depicted in Table 11 show that the produced PW from HTC and Co-HTC process contain a variety of dissolved organic compounds, such as organic acids, sugars, phenols etc. The organic compounds are produced from dehydration, decarboxylation and demethylation reactions occurring under hydrothermal process conditions31. These compounds are typical of decomposed biomass in the natural environment, but high concentrations in discharge water can pollute receiving waterbodies70,73. From the results in Table 11, the concentration of oxime methoxy-phenyl was found higher followed by ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate-tricyclo (3.2.2.0) nonan-2-yl 4-nitrophenyl carbonate and silane-(4-bromophenyl) triphenyl. The higher concentration of these component was observed in the LCB compared to LCT and LCS respectively. The results agreed with the concentration of organic matter determined previously from ICP-OES analysis. Thus, confirmed the increased decomposition of coal and sewage under Co-HTC74. The concentrations of organic elements dissolved in the produced PW indicate the significancy of its dilution before discharge in waterbodies75. However, the produced PW could be recycled to avoid generation of additional wastes. In addition, previous works demonstrated that the use of PW in HTC and Co-HTC increases the carbonization mass yield due to their acidic properties and the condensation of aliphatic fragments content dissolved during precedent hydrothermal process62. The acidity of hydrothermal reaction medium strengthens polymerization of benzyl alcohol structure of raw material via the carbonium ion which is the intermediate of the reaction74,75. The chemical identification of dissolved organic compound reveals the predominance of carboxylic acid, aromatic compound and low aliphatic hydrocarbons in the produced PW as described in Table 11.
Determination of total carbon TC and total organic carbon TOC of the produced PW
The results in Table 12 show the overall levels of organic compounds present without a direct correlation between TOC and the total concentration of organic compounds present in the produced PW. However, the TOC composition illustrates the general organic contamination of the PW32. The results show that TOC weight percentages are lower than the TIC weight percentage due to the release of organic carbon in the liquid phase during the hydrothermal process50. The total organic carbon property of water gives an insight of the amount of oxygen necessary to oxidize all the organic carbon completely66. The TOC of LCT and LCB exceeding the special limit for discharge in rivers (11.5 mg/l) of the SA national water discharge regulations creates aerobic conditions which threats aquatic lives68. The results in Table 12 show that the produced TOC of PW exceed the special limit of discharge in rivers. This is consistent with the COD results obtained from organic matter determined by ICP-OES analysis. Hence, prior treatment of PW is necessary before its envisioned potential discharge in rivers. A combination of dilution, wet oxidation for the degradation of organic components into CO2 and water, and adsorption for the removal of the residual mineral elements could be employed to treat produced PW prior to its discharge in water bodies68,72,75. Koechermann et al.73 reported that recirculating PW in the HTC process increases the carbonization yield of the produced HCs. Therefore, from an economic and environmental aspect, the PW generated by the HTC and Co-HTC processes was recycled in this study, as indicated in the methodology (Fig. 2).
Conclusion
This study optimized the hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) of coal discards from coal beneficiation operations and/or sewage sludge by optimizing a number of process parameters, including biomass type, temperature, and residence time, in order to produce hydrochar with improved physicochemical properties.
The optimized HTC conditions (150 °C, 27 bar, 95 min) for individual CT and CS increased the amount of fixed carbon from 37.31% and 53.02–40.31% and 57.69%, respectively, on a dry basis. As a result, the total carbon content of the coal discards increased from 42.82 and 61.85% to 49.80 and 66.90% in the HCT and HCS produced, respectively. In addition, the ash content of coal discards reported on a dry basis decreased from 40.32 and 24.17% to 38.3 and 20.17% in the HCT and HCS produced under optimized HTC conditions. While the optimized Co-HTC conditions of 208 °C, 22.5bars, and 360 min for a CT + CS:SS blend ratio of 5:1 increased the fixed carbon reported on a dry basis and total carbon content of CB (a blend of CT + CS + SS) from 38.67% and 45.64%, respectively, to 58.82% and 67.0%, respectively. The HCB ash concentration decreased from 38.8 to 19.71%. The carbonization yields (Cy) for HCT, HCS, and HCB were determined to be 113.58%, 102.42%, and 129.88%, respectively. Co-carbonization HTC's yield (Cy) was higher than that of HTC alone, possibly as a result of an increase in acidic conditions caused by the degradation of cellulose, chlorine, and hemicellulose into organic acid monomers during decarboxylation and dehydration reactions of the Co-HTC process. As a result, the lower pH of the Co-HTC process liquid increases the sulphur removal (production of sulphite and sulphate) from 0.83 to 0.39% and possibly allows the release of inorganic elements into the liquid phase. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the Co-HTC process for reducing the sulphur content of waste coals and sewage sludge. HCB synthesized from Co-HTC had comparable physicochemical properties to HCS synthesized from HTC, with the highest carbon content and the lowest ash content (CS). This demonstrated the viability of combining coal waste and sewage sludge to produce high-quality carbonaceous material for a variety of applications.
Data availability
All data relevant to the study are included in the article. In addition, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Bohlmann, J. A. & Inglesi-Lotz, R. Analysing the South African residential sector’s energy profile. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 96, 240–252 (2018).
Van de Venter, F. F. Producing Briquettes for Domestic Household Fuel Applications from Coal Tailings (Doctoral dissertation) (2021).
Onifade, M., Genc, B. & Bada, S. Spontaneous combustion liability between coal seams: A thermogravimetric study. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 30(5), 691–698 (2020).
Petlovanyi, M. V., Lozynskyi, V. H., Saik, P. B. & Sai, K. S. Modern experience of low-coal seams underground mining in Ukraine. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 28(6), 917–923 (2018).
Fijalkowski, K., Rorat, A., Grobelak, A. & Kacprzak, M. J. The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge—The current situation. J. Environ. Manag. 203, 1126–1136 (2017).
Venkatesan, A. K., Done, H. Y. & Halden, R. U. United States National Sewage Sludge Repository at Arizona State University—A new resource and research tool for environmental scientists, engineers, and epidemiologists. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22(3), 1577–1586 (2015).
Shaddel, S., Bakhtiary-Davijany, H., Kabbe, C., Dadgar, F. & Østerhus, S. W. Sustainable sewage sludge management: From current practices to emerging nutrient recovery technologies. Sustainability 11(12), 3435 (2019).
Munir, M., Siddiqui, S. A., Dengel, A. & Ahmed, S. DeepAnT: A deep learning approach for unsupervised anomaly detection in time series. IEEE Access 7, 1991–2005 (2018).
Tasca, A. L. et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: A critical analysis of process severity, hydrochar properties and environmental implications. Waste Manag. 93, 1–13 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. Effect of residence time on hydrothermal carbonization of corn cob residual. BioResources 10(3), 3979–3986 (2015).
Liao, J., Fei, Y., Marshall, M., Chaffee, A. L. & Chang, L. Hydrothermal dewatering of a Chinese lignite and properties of the solid products. Fuel 180, 473–480 (2016).
Saba, A., Saha, P. & Reza, M. T. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of coal-biomass blend: Influence of temperature on solid fuel properties. Fuel Process. Technol. 167, 711–720 (2017).
Wang, L., Chang, Y. & Li, A. Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 108, 423–440 (2019).
Mumme, J. et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of digestate in the presence of zeolite: Process efficiency and composite properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3(11), 2967–2974 (2015).
Hlangwani, E., Doorsamy, W., Adebiyi, J. A., Fajimi, L. I. & Adebo, O. A. A modeling method for the development of a bioprocess to optimally produce umqombothi (a South African traditional beer). Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–15 (2021).
Afolabi, O. O., Sohail, M. & Cheng, Y. L. Optimisation and characterisation of hydrochar production from spent coffee grounds by hydrothermal carbonisation. Renew. Energy 147, 1380–1391 (2020).
Barghi, B. et al. Process optimization for catalytic oxidation of dibenzothiophene over UiO-66-NH2 by using a response surface methodology. ACS Omega 7, 16288–16297 (2022).
Lin, Y., Wu, G. S., Yuan, X. Y., Xie, T. & Zhang, L. D. Fabrication and optical properties of TiO2 nanowire arrays made by sol–gel electrophoresis deposition into anodic alumina membranes. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15(17), 2917 (2003).
Norrish, K. & Hutton, J. T. An accurate X-ray spectrographic method for the analysis of a wide range of geological samples. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 33(4), 431–453 (1969).
Liu, L. et al. Optimizing anaerobic technology by using electrochemistry and membrane module for treating pesticide wastewater: Chemical oxygen demand components and fractions distribution, membrane fouling, effluent toxicity and economic analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 346, 126608 (2022).
Samson, B. A. D. A., Daniel, T. A. O., Honaker, R., Falcon, L. & Falcon, R. Parametric study of electrostatic separation of South African fine coal. Min. Sci. Technol. (China) 20(4), 535–541 (2010).
Hutton, A. & Mandile, A. J. Quantitative XRD measurement of mineral matter in Gondwana coals using the Rietveld method. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 23(1), 61–72 (1996).
Akhtar, J. & Amin, N. S. A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(7), 5101–5109 (2012).
Nakason, K. et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of unwanted biomass materials: Effect of process temperature and retention time on hydrochar and liquid fraction. J. Energy Inst. 91(5), 786–796 (2018).
Heidari, M., Dutta, A., Acharya, B. & Mahmud, S. A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J. Energy Inst. 92(6), 1779–1799 (2019).
Nizamuddin, S. et al. An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 1289–1299 (2017).
Abdulsalam, J., Mulopo, J., Oboirien, B., Bada, S. & Falcon, R. Experimental evaluation of activated carbon derived from South Africa discard coal for natural gas storage. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 6(3), 459–477 (2019).
Behera, S. K., Meena, H., Chakraborty, S. & Meikap, B. C. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 28(4), 621–629 (2018).
Teimouri, M., Abdolahnezhad, K. & Ghalandarayeshi, S. Evaluation of estimation methods for parameters of the probability functions in tree diameter distribution modeling. Environ. Resour. Res. 8(1), 25–40 (2020).
Aliakbari, Z., Younesi, H., Ghoreyshi, A. A., Bahramifar, N. & Heidari, A. Production and characterization of sewage-sludge based activated carbons under different post-activation conditions. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 9(3), 451–463 (2018).
Jin, F., Wang, Y., Zeng, X., Shen, Z. & Yao, G. Water under high temperature and pressure conditions and its applications to develop green technologies for biomass conversion. In Application of Hydrothermal Reactions to Biomass Conversion (ed. Jin, F.) 3–28 (Springer, 2014).
Hoekman, S. K., Broch, A. & Robbins, C. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuels 25(4), 1802–1810 (2011).
Mursito, A. T., Hirajima, T. & Sasaki, K. Upgrading and dewatering of raw tropical peat by hydrothermal treatment. Fuel 89(3), 635–641 (2010).
Pińkowska, H., Wolak, P. & Złocińska, A. Hydrothermal decomposition of xylan as a model substance for plant biomass waste–hydrothermolysis in subcritical water. Biomass Bioenergy 35(9), 3902–3912 (2011).
Sahu, S. G., Sarkar, P., Chakraborty, N. & Adak, A. K. Thermogravimetric assessment of combustion characteristics of blends of a coal with different biomass chars. Fuel Process. Technol. 91(3), 369–378 (2010).
Lu, X., Pellechia, P. J., Flora, J. R. & Berge, N. D. Influence of reaction time and temperature on product formation and characteristics associated with the hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 138, 180–190 (2013).
Channiwala, S. A. & Parikh, P. P. A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81(8), 1051–1063 (2002).
Kang, S., Li, X., Fan, J. & Chang, J. Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, D-xylose, and wood meal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(26), 9023–9031 (2012).
Yin, Y. et al. FT-IR and micro-Raman spectroscopic characterization of minerals in high-calcium coal ashes. J. Energy Inst. 91(3), 389–396 (2018).
Harris, W. I. L. L. I. E. & Norman White, G. X-ray diffraction techniques for soil mineral identification. Methods Soil Anal. Part 5 Mineral. Methods 5, 81–115 (2008).
Eterigho-Ikelegbe, O., Trammell, R. & Bada, S. Preparation and characterization of ceramic composites from South Africa coal discard. Constr. Build. Mater. 302, 124164 (2021).
Jeffery, J. W. The crystal structure of tricalcium silicate. Acta Crystallogr. 5(1), 26–35 (1952).
Neto, J. S. A. et al. Hydration and interactions between pure and doped C3S and C3A in the presence of different calcium sulfates. Cem. Concr. Res. 159, 106893 (2022).
Kruse, A., Funke, A. & Titirici, M. M. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels and energetic materials. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17(3), 515–521 (2013).
Knappe, V., Paczkowski, S., Robles, L. A. D., Gonzales, A. & Pelz, S. Reducing willow wood fuel emission by low temperature microwave assisted hydrothermal carbonization. JoVE J. Vis. Exp. 147, e58970 (2019).
Jal, P. K., Patel, S. & Mishra, B. K. Chemical modification of silica surface by immobilization of functional groups for extractive concentration of metal ions. Talanta 62(5), 1005–1028 (2004).
Mishra, R. K. & Mohanty, K. Characterization of non-edible lignocellulosic biomass in terms of their candidacy towards alternative renewable fuels. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 8(4), 799–812 (2018).
Doshi, P., Srivastava, G., Pathak, G. & Dikshit, M. Physicochemical and thermal characterization of nonedible oilseed residual waste as sustainable solid biofuel. Waste Manag. 34(10), 1836–1846 (2014).
Balachandran, M. Role of infrared spectroscopy in coal analysis—An investigation. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 5, 367–372 (2014).
Achinas, S., Achinas, V. & Euverink, G. J. W. A technological overview of biogas production from biowaste. Engineering 3(3), 299–307 (2017).
Painter, P., Starsinic, M. & Coleman, M. Determination of functional groups in coal by Fourier transform interferometry. Fourier Transf. Infrared Spectrosc. 4, 169–240 (2012).
Okolo, G. N. et al. Chemical–structural properties of South African bituminous coals: Insights from wide angle XRD–carbon fraction analysis, ATR–FTIR, solid state 13C NMR, and HRTEM techniques. Fuel 158, 779–792 (2015).
Hattingh, B. B. et al. Elucidation of the structural and molecular properties of typical South African coals. Energy Fuels 27(6), 3161–3172 (2013).
Tan, J. et al. Using low-rank coal slime as an eco-friendly replacement for carbon black filler in styrene butadiene rubber. J. Clean. Prod. 234, 949–960 (2019).
Li, J. et al. The mineralogy, morphology and sintering characteristics of ash deposits on a probe at different temperatures during combustion of blends of Zhundong lignite and a bituminous coal in a drop tube furnace. Fuel Process. Technol. 149, 176–186 (2016).
Lu, X. & Berge, N. D. Influence of feedstock chemical composition on product formation and characteristics derived from the hydrothermal carbonization of mixed feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 166, 120–131 (2014).
Shui, H. et al. Modification of a sub-bituminous coal by hydrothermal treatment with the addition of CaO: Extraction and caking properties. Energy Fuels 26(5), 2928–2933 (2012).
Thommes, M. et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87(9–10), 1051–1069 (2015).
Han, J. et al. The N-doped activated carbon derived from sugarcane bagasse for CO2 adsorption. Ind. Crops Prod. 128, 290–297 (2019).
Jabłońska, B., Kityk, A. V., Busch, M. & Huber, P. The structural and surface properties of natural and modified coal gangue. J. Environ. Manag. 190, 80–90 (2017).
Okhovat, A., Ahmadpour, A., Ahmadpour, F. & Khaki Yadegar, Z. Pore size distribution analysis of coal-based activated carbons: Investigating the effects of activating agent and chemical ratio. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012, 1–10 (2012).
Uddin, M. H., Reza, M. T., Lynam, J. G. & Coronella, C. J. Effects of water recycling in hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 33(4), 1309–1315 (2014).
Reza, M. T. Investigation of hydrothermal carbonization and chemical activation process conditions on hydrogen storage in loblolly pine-derived superactivated hydrochars. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 26422–26434 (2022).
McKee, A. D. et al. A possible path to prebiotic peptides involving silica and hydroxy acid-mediated amide bond formation. ChemBioChem 19(18), 1913–1917 (2018).
Nakhli, S. A. A., Panta, S., Brown, J. D., Tian, J. & Imhoff, P. T. Quantifying biochar content in a field soil with varying organic matter content using a two-temperature loss on ignition method. Sci. Total Environ. 658, 1106–1116 (2019).
Cai, Y., Fu, X., Gao, X. & Li, L. Research progress of on-line automatic monitoring of chemical oxygen demand (COD) of water. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 121, No. 2, p. 022039. (IOP Publishing, 2018).
Kang, M., Peng, S., Tian, Y. & Zhang, H. Effects of dissolved oxygen and nutrient loading on phosphorus fluxes at the sediment–water interface in the Hai River Estuary, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 130, 132–139 (2018).
Zhang, W. et al. Dissolved oxygen variation in the North China Plain River network region over 2011–2020 and the influencing factors. Chemosphere 287, 132354 (2022).
Setsepu, R. L., Abdulsalam, J., Weiersbye, I. M. & Bada, S. O. Hydrothermal carbonization of Searsia lancea trees grown on mine drainage: Processing variables and product composition. ACS Omega 6(31), 20292–20302 (2021).
Grindley, S. F. Modelling the Effects of Trees on a Contaminated Groundwater Plume from a Gold Tailings Storage Facility in the Orkney District. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Science, School of Geography, Archaeology & Environmental Studies. (2015).
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Government Gazette No. 20526 8 October 1999; DWAF; Government Notice; 8 October 1999. South Afica (1999).
Dam, F. P., Dam, M. & Sindane, J. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (2008)
Koechermann, J., Goersch, K., Wirth, B., Muehlenberg, J. & Klemm, M. Hydrothermal carbonization: Temperature influence on hydrochar and aqueous phase composition during process water recirculation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6(4), 5481–5487 (2018).
Li, J. G., Ishigaki, T. & Sun, X. Anatase, brookite, and rutile nanocrystals via redox reactions under mild hydrothermal conditions: Phase-selective synthesis and physicochemical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 111(13), 4969–4976 (2007).
Liu, J. et al. Removal of oxygen functional groups in lignite by hydrothermal dewatering: An experimental and DFT study. Fuel 178, 85–92 (2016).
Funding
DSI-NRF SARChI funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.M.K., S.B. and J.M. have all participated in (a) the conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kahilu, G.M., Bada, S. & Mulopo, J. Physicochemical, structural analysis of coal discards (and sewage sludge) (co)-HTC derived biochar for a sustainable carbon economy and evaluation of the liquid by-product. Sci Rep 12, 17532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22528-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22528-y
This article is cited by
-
A systematic overview of current advancements for chemical, material, and energy production using sewage sludge for industrial ecology and sustainability transition
Environmental Sustainability (2024)
-
Exploration du processus de production de déchets à partir du charbon et des eaux usées
Nature Africa (2022)
-
Coal and sewage waste process explored
Nature Africa (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
