Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a major human health problem due to its increasing incidence and mortality rate. CC and CXC chemokines are associated with tumorigenesis and the progression of many cancers. Since the prognostic values of CC and CXC families' expression in various types of cancers are becoming increasingly evident, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis elucidating the prognostic values of the CC and CXC families in BC. Therefore, TCGA, UALCAN, Kaplan–Meier plotter, bc-GenExMiner, cBioPortal, STRING, Enrichr, and TIMER were utilized for analysis. We found that high levels of CCL4/5/14/19/21/22 were associated with better OS and RFS, while elevated expression of CCL24 was correlated with shorter OS in BC patients. Also, high levels of CXCL9/13 indicated longer OS, and enhanced expression of CXCL12/14 was linked with better OS and RFS in BC patients. Meanwhile, increased transcription levels of CXCL8 were associated with worse OS and RFS in BC patients. In addition, our results showed that CCL5, CCL8, CCL14, CCL20, CCL27, CXCL4, and CXCL14 were notably correlated with the clinical outcomes of BC patients. Our findings provide a new point of view that may help the clinical application of CC and CXC chemokines as prognostic biomarkers in BC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
According to the GLOBOCAN 2020 data, breast cancer (BC) has the highest incidence among cancers, with almost 2.3 million new cases every year. BC is the most leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with ~ 685,000 deaths, among women worldwide1. There are five molecular subtypes of BC (Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple-negative/Basal-like, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Normal-like) defined by the gene expression profile2. Despite advances in the therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to BC, the prognosis remains poor in some patients due to resistance to chemotherapy and metastasis. Therefore, identifying better therapeutic and prognostic biomarkers seems mandatory for BC3,4.
The immune mechanisms modulating cancer progression are an attractive field of interest that has taken the focus of intensive research over the years5. Chemokines, a family of cytokines, are secreted by tumor cells, leukocytes, immune cells, and other cell types and have been identified to regulate inflammation and immune responses6. Chemokines are divided into four main subgroups (CXC, CC, C, and CX3C) according to the number and location of the first two conserved cysteine residues at the N terminus7. Based on their functions and expression patterns, chemokines are classified into homeostatic and inflammatory subsets. Inflammatory chemokines are usually induced during inflammation. They are expressed by leukocytes and other cell types, allowing the recruitment of inflammatory leukocytes to the damaged tissues8,9. On the contrary, homeostatic chemokines are continuously expressed in specific tissues in the absence of apparent activating stimuli and regulate cellular trafficking and immune surveillance systems8,9,10. CC and CXC chemokines display pivotal roles in tumor angiogenesis, growth, invasion, and metastasis7,11. CXC chemokines can be classified into ELR+ (Glu-Leu-Arg) or ELR- chemokines based on the presence of the tripeptide motif (Glu-Leu- Arg) at the N terminal. Of note, ELR+ CXC chemokines promote tumor angiogenesis, whereas ELR- CXC chemokines are considered to attract lymphocytes and inhibit angiogenesis11,12.
Emerging studies have investigated the expression patterns and prognostic values of the CXC and CC chemokine members in a variety of human cancers, including colon cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer13,14,15,16,17,18. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis elucidating the prognostic values of the whole CXC and CC families in BC.
Methods
All the methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
TCGA
The CC and CXC family expression profiles and corresponding clinical-pathological data (1104 patients) of BC patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/). The association between CC and CXC chemokines expression and clinical-pathological features and overall survival (OS) of BC patients were evaluated by the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. M, N and T pathologies, pathologic_stage, progesterone receptor status, estrogen receptor status, and age at diagnosis were used in multivariate Cox analysis. All factors were considered as categorical. Age was dichomatized with respect to 55 years.
UALCAN
UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) database provides analysis of cancer-related omics data of TCGA and MET500 databases19. mRNA expression of CC and CXC chemokines in BC and normal tissues were analyzed using the "TCGA gene analysis" module of UALCAN database. Statistical analyses were determined by the student's t-test between groups. P-values of < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Kaplan–Meier plotter
We utilized the Kaplan–Meier plotter (www.kmplot.com), an online database containing gene expression profiles and survival data of cancer patients20, to evaluate the prognostic value of the CC and CXC family members in breast cancer patients. In order to analyze the OS, and recurrence-free survival (RFS), samples were divided into high and low expression groups according to the median gene expression. The hazard ratios (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and log-rank p-value were calculated. A value of P < 0.05 was defined as significant.
bc-GenExMiner v4.7
The Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner v4.7 (bcGenExMiner v4.7) (http://bcgenex.ico.unicancer.fr) is an online web server including expression, prognosis, and correlation modules21. In the current study, the "expression" module of the bcGenExMiner was applied to assess the expression of CXC and CC chemokines according to Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade and intrinsic molecular subtypes determined by Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 (PAM50) test. The Dunnett–Tukey–Kramer's test and Welch's t-test were performed to calculate the p-value. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
cBioPortal
cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org/) is a comprehensive online database for visualizing and analyzing multidimensional cancer genomics data22,23. The breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose legacy) dataset, containing data from 1108 samples, was selected to analyze the genomic profile changes, including mutations, putative copy number alterations (CNAs) from genomic identification of significant targets in cancer (GISTIC), and mRNA expression Z scores (microarray). Also, the top 50 most frequently altered genes with CC and CXC chemokines in BC were obtained from cBioPortal. The P-value of < 0.05 was considered as the cut-off.
STRING
The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network among two chemokine families and the top 50 frequently altered genes were constructed by STRING (https://string-db.org/) database and visualized using the Cytoscape (version 3.8.2) with a confidence score of > 0.424,25.
Enrichr
Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/) is a web-based tool for enrichment analysis26,27,28. Enrichr was applied to perform gene ontology (GO) functional annotation (GO terms such as Biological Process and Molecular Function) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis, transcription factor analysis using Chip Enrichment Analysis (ChEA) database, and miRNA prediction using miRTarBase of CC and CXC chemokines. The ggplot2 R package was used to generate figures of KEGG analysis. P-value < 0.05 was set as criteria.
MethSurv
MethSurv (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/) is a web tool to perform survival analysis based on CpG methylation patterns29. MethSurv was used to identify the prognostic value of single CpG methylation of CC and CXC chemokines in BC patients.
TIMER
Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER) (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/) is a comprehensive resource that provides a systematic analysis of the infiltration of different immune cells and their clinical influence across a spectrum of cancer types30,31. In the current study, the "gene" module of TIMER was applied to examine the correlation of CC and CXC chemokines expression and immune infiltrating cells including B cell, CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic cells by purity-corrected partial Spearman method. The "survival" module was also used to investigate the cumulative OS of CC and CXC chemokine expression and immune cell infiltration associated with clinical outcomes among BC patients. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Expression of chemokines in BC cell lines
CCLE is a database of gene expression in different cancer cell lines32. We assessed the expression of CC and CXC chemokines in 51 BC cell lines. We also used the data regarding age, pathology, race, and doubling times of the cell lines available in the dataset.
Searching for inhibitors and drug repurposing
First, the BRCA TCGA dataset was used to obtain differentially expressed genes. To search for direct competitive inhibitors of the upregulated CXCL and CCL genes, they were searched in PharmGKB33. This resource is a publicly available, online knowledge base integrating the effect of human genetic variation on drug response, however, it can be also used to obtain drugs targeting a gene. To search for drugs capable of reversing the direction of CC and CXC chemokines, we used the L1000Cds2 server. The L1000Cds2 perturbation database is an open resource database that provides linking gene expression patterns and drugs34. We searched for drugs or drug combinations that can induce opposite CC and CXC expression, to what seen in BR differentially expressed CCL and CXCL genes were used to obtain chemicals that reverse their gene expression pattern in BRCA.
Results
The univariate and multivariate OS analyses of CC and CXC chemokines and clinicopathological data in patients with BC
We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to elucidate the relationships between the clinicopathological data and the survival of BC patients in TCGA. According to the multivariate analysis, age, stage, and M pathology were identified to be independent prognostic factors for BC patients (P < 0.05). Additionally, the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses clarified the prognostic significance of whole CC and CXC chemokine families in BC. The results revealed that CCL15/19/27 and CXCL7/14 expression can be independent prognostic factors for BC patients (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
The mRNA expression analysis of CC and CXC chemokines in BC patients
The mRNA expression levels of CC and CXC chemokines between primary tumor and normal tissues in BC patients were assessed using UALCAN. The mRNA expression levels of CCL1/5/7/11/17/19/20/22/25 chemokines were found to be elevated in primary tumors compared to normal specimens, while CCL2/3/4/8/13/14/15/16/18/21/23/24/28 were significantly downregulated in tumor samples (Fig. 1a). In addition, the expression of CXCL9/10/11/13 in primary tumor samples was remarkably higher than normal samples, whereas CXCL2/3/4/6/7/8/12/17 transcription levels were significantly lower (all P < 0.05) (Fig. 1b).
The transcription levels of CC (a) and CXC (b) chemokines in BC and normal breast tissues (UALCAN). The statistical analysis of differential expression between groups was determined by the student's t-test. The Y-axis shows transcripts per million of each RNA molecule, and the X-axis represents the samples. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
The prognostic value of CC and CXC chemokines in patients with BC
The Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that among CC and CXC chemokines, high mRNA expression of CCL4/5/14/19/21/22 and CXCL9/12/13/14 was notably associated with better OS (P < 0.05), while elevated expression of CCL24 and CXCL8 were associated with shorter OS in BC patients (P < 0.05). In addition, regarding RFS, BC patients with increased mRNA levels of CCL1/3/4/5/11/13/14/15/16/19/21/22/23/25 and CXCL2/3/4/5/6/7/12/14/16 were significantly correlated with favorable RFS (P < 0.05). On the other hand, elevated expression of CCL8/18 and CXCL8/10/11 were remarkably correlated with unfavorable RFS (P < 0.05). Figure 2 illustrates the Kaplan–Meier curves of chemokines in which mRNA expression levels are significantly associated with OS and RFS.
The prognostic value of the CC and CXC chemokines mRNA expression (Kaplan–Meier plotter). The association of mRNA expression of CC and CXC family with OS (a) and RFS (b) in BC patients. Red and black lines represent survival curves of the patient groups with values higher and lower than the median expression levels in the target genes, respectively. The confidence intervals are represented in brackets. HR, hazard ratio.
Correlation between mRNA expression levels of CC and CXC chemokines and breast cancer grades and subtypes
In the current study, bcGenExMiner v4.7 was applied to compare the mRNA levels of CC, and CXC chemokines between groups of BC patients divided according to SBR grade status and PAM50 BC subtypes. Regarding the SBR grade criterion, patients with advanced SBR grades tended to express higher mRNA levels of CCL5/8/18/20 and CXCL8/9/10/11/13/17 and lower mRNA levels of CCL14 and CXCL12/14 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). In the case of PAM50 subtypes, the expression of CCL2/3/4/5/7/8/13/18/20 and CXCL1/3/5/8/10/11/13/16 was notably higher in the basal-like subtype in comparison to the HER2, luminal A/B, and normal breast-like (P < 0.05). Additionally, CCL11/22 and CXCL17 expression were notably highest in the HER2 subtype when compared to other subtypes (basal-like, luminal A/B, and normal breast-like (P < 0.05)) (Fig. 4).
Association between CC (a) and CXC (b) chemokines expression and SBR grade status of BC patients (bc-GenExMiner v4.2). Using Welch's tests and Dunnett–Tukey–Kramer's test, the difference in mRNA expression between groups was assessed. Box plot of CC and CXC chemokines expression goes from the lower quartile (Q1) to the upper quartile (Q3), and the median is marked with a horizontal dotted line. Whiskers are lines at the bottom and the top of the box representing the distance between the quartiles and 1.5 times the interquartile range. No, number of patients. CXCL4, namely PF4. CXCL7, namely PPBP. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
The distribution of CC (a) and CXC (b) chemokines expression according to the PAM50 subtype of breast cancer (bc-GenExMiner v4.7). Using Welch's tests and Dunnett–Tukey–Kramer's test, the difference in mRNA expression between groups was assessed. Box plot of CC and CXC chemokines expression goes from the lower quartile (Q1) to the upper quartile (Q3), and the median is marked with a horizontal dotted line. Whiskers are lines at the bottom and the top of the box representing the distance between the quartiles and 1.5 times the interquartile range. The number of patients is represented in brackets. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Genomic alterations and GO enrichment analysis of CC and CXC members in BC patients
Genomic alterations of the CC and CXC chemokines were analyzed using the cBioPortal database. The results showed that CC and CXC genes were altered in 363 (33%) and 247 (22%) of 1101 BC patients, respectively (Fig. 5a,b). As a result, each of CCL1/2/3/4/7/11/15/18/22/23 was altered in 5% of BC patients. Besides, our results revealed that CXCL6 was mutated in 6% of BC cases. Moreover, the 50 most frequently altered neighbor genes co-expressed with CC and CXC chemokines in BC were mapped and visualized using Cytoscape (Fig. 5c, d). Genomic alterations of the top 10 frequently altered genes with CC and CXC family members in BC patients are presented in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Genomic alteration of CC (a) and CXC (b) chemokines in BC patients (cBioPortal). Green in grey: missense mutation (unknown significance); darker grey in grey: truncating mutation (unknown significance); red: amplification; blue: deep deletion; pink Rectangle in grey: mRNA upregulation; blue Rectangle in grey: mRNA downregulation; grey only: no alteration. PPI network of CC (c) and CXC (d) chemokines and the 50 most frequently altered neighboring genes in BC (STRING). Gray lines represent the interactions.
Furthermore, the Enrichr database was used to determine the functions and pathways of CC and CXC chemokines and their frequently altered neighbor genes. The molecular functions of CC and CXC members and their neighbor genes were mainly chemokine activity and CXCR chemokine receptor binding, respectively (Fig. 6a, b). The most commonly enriched biological processes for CC and CXC members and their neighbor genes were lymphocyte migration and antimicrobial humoral immune response mediated by antimicrobial peptide, respectively (Fig. 6c, d). In KEGG pathway analysis, we revealed that CC and CXC chemokines and their neighbor genes were most commonly enriched in viral protein interaction with cytokine and cytokine receptor (Fig. 6e, f).
Enrichment analysis of CC and CXC chemokines and top 50 altered neighbor genes in BC. Top 10 significantly enriched GO terms of CC (a) and CXC (b) in molecular functions. Top 10 significantly enriched GO terms of CC (c) and CXC (d) in biological processes. The x-axis shows the − log10 (P-value), and the y-axis shows the GO terms, including molecular functions and biological processes. KEGG enrichment scatter plots of CC (e) and CXC (f) chemokines. The Y-axis shows the KEGG pathway terms, and the x-axis shows the rich factor. The P-value is represented by a color scale. A value of P < 0.05 was defined as significant.
Prediction of miRNA and TF associated with CC and CXC members
Transcription factors (TFs) and miRNAs potentially regulating CC and CXC chemokines were retrieved from ChEA and miRTarBase databases and summarized in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Furthermore, the prognostic value of the resulting TFs and miRNAs were assessed using Kaplan–Meier plotter in BC. The elevated expression levels of the transcription factors IRF4, IRF8, NR1H3, PBX1, STAT6, ERG, and ESR1 were found to be significantly associated with better OS in BC patients. On the contrary, higher BP1 mRNA levels were associated with shorter OS in BC patients (all P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online). Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that the high expression of MIR-4270, MIR-4441, and MIR-3065-5p were remarkably correlated with shorter OS, while the elevated expression of MIR-542-3p was associated with prolonged OS in BC patients (all P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Fig. S2 online).
The prognostic value of single CpG methylation of CC and CXC chemokines in BC patients
The heatmaps of DNA methylation of the CC and CXC chemokines were explored (Fig. 7). Among them, cg12627751 of CCL1, cg21109025 of CCL2, cg18407309 of CCL3, cg17191872 of CCL4, cg12455187 of CCL5, cg17256679 of CCL8, cg03297192 of CCL11, cg24615251 of CCL13, cg10190509 of CCL16, cg01100208 of CCL17, cg06040872 of CCL18, cg13665853 of CCL19, cg09425228 of CCL20, cg05700681 of CCL22, cg24325790 of CCL23, cg04156900 of CCL24, cg08703722 of CCL25, cg23298782 of CCL26, cg09722555 of CCL27, cg03077492 of CCL28, cg10350689 of CXCL1, cg01470535 of CXCL2, cg13468041 of CXCL3, cg14882398 of CXCL4, cg15478045 of CXCL5, cg22670329 of CXCL6, cg20357806 of CXCL7, cg08046471 of CXCL11, cg06671614 of CXCL12, cg12020230 of CXCL13, cg23510026 of CXCL14, and cg22276896 of CXCL17 had the highest DNA methylation level. Additionally, we identified that 5 CpGs of CCL1, 2 CpGs of CCL2, 1 CpG of CCL3, 1 CpG of CCL5, 1 CpG of CCL7, 1 CpG of CCL8, 3 CpGs of CCL11, 3 CpGs of CCL13, 2 CpGs of CCL16, 2 CpGs of CCL17, 1 CpG of CCL18, 1 CpG of CCL19, 1 CpG of CCL20, 3 CpGs of CCL22, 1 CpG of CCL23, 4 CpGs of CCL24, 2 CpGs of CCL25, 1 CpG of CCL26, and 1 CpG of CCL27, 2 CpGs of CXCL1, 4 CpGs of CXCL2, 1 CpG of CXCL3, 2 CpGs of CXCL4, 5 CpGs of CXCL5, 2 CpGs of CXCL6, 1 CpG of CXCL9, 1 CpG of CXCL10, 6 CpGs of CXCL12, 2 CpGs of CXCL13, 3 CpGs of CXCL14, and 2 CpGs of CXCL17 were significantly associated with prognosis in BC patients (Table 4 and see Supplementary Figs. S3, S4 online).
The heatmap of the CpG methylation levels of CC (a) and CXC (b) chemokines in BC patients (MethSurv). Rows indicate the CpGs, and the columns indicate the patients. Methylation levels (1 = fully methylated; 0 = fully unmethylated) are shown as a continuous variable from a red to blue color, high expression to low expression. Various colorful side boxes were used to represent the ethnicity, race, age, event, relation to UCSC_CpG_island, UCSC_refGene_Group.
Correlation between CC and CXC chemokines and immune cell infiltration in BC
We applied the TIMER database to evaluate the correlation between CC and CXC chemokines expression and immune cell infiltration in BC. The results indicated that the expression of CCL2/3/4/7/8/11/13/18/22/23/24 and CXCL9/10/11/12/16 were positively correlated with the infiltration of six immune cell types (B cell, CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, macrophage cells, neutrophil cells, and dendritic cells) (all with P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Fig. S5 online). Moreover, we found that among CC chemokines, the expression of CCL3 was mostly correlated with high infiltration abundances of macrophage cells (Cor = 0.246, P = 4.82e−15) in BC. Also, CCL4 expression was mostly associated with increased infiltration abundances of neutrophils (Cor = 0.686, P = 3.42e−133) and dendritic cells (Cor = 0.687, P = 8.17e−134). We found that infiltration of CD8+ (Cor = 0.526, P = 1.99e−70) and CD4+ T cells (Cor = 0.597, P = 4.92e−94) was mainly correlated with the CCL5 expression levels. Additionally, CCL19 expression levels showed the highest correlation with B cell (Cor = 0.303, P = 3.76e−22) infiltration. Besides, among CXC chemokines, CXCL9 expression levels were the most highly correlated to B cell (Cor = 0.519, P = 1.78e−68), CD8+ T cell (Cor = 0.543, P = 5.79e−76), CD4+ T cell (Cor = 0.518, P = 4.87e−67), and dendritic cells (Cor = 0.617, P = 4.87e−101) infiltration in BC patients. We also found that expression levels of CXCL10 and CXCL12 had the highest association with neutrophils (Cor = 0.641, P = 3.08e−111) and macrophages (Cor = 0.455, P = 1.69e−51) infiltration, respectively. Furthermore, we utilized the Cox proportional hazard model for CC and CXC chemokines and all six tumor-infiltrating immune cells in BC. As summarized in Supplementary Tables S3 and S4, CCL5 (P = 0.008), CCL8 (P = 0.000), CCL14 (P = 0.042), CCL20 (P = 0.016), CCL27 (P = 0.041), CXCL4 (PF4) (P = 0.017), and CXCL14 (P = 0.004) were remarkably correlated with the clinical outcomes of BC patients.
The expression level of CC and CXC chemokines in BC cell lines
Heatmaps of expression values of CXC and CC chemokines in the 51 cell lines with expression information in the CCLE database are shown in Fig. 8. Race, pathology, and age of cell donors had no association with CC or CXC chemokines expression.
The expression patterns of CC and CXC chemokines in 51 breast cancer cell lines included in CCLE database. The information from the TCGA is also added to figure: log2 (Fold change) and mean of expression each cytokine is readable from the left annotation to each heatmap.
Drug candidates for reversing the effect of CC and CXC chemokines in cancer
As most drugs work through competitive inhibition, upregulated genes were submitted to https://www.pharmgkb.org/ to find current FDA approved drugs; however, there were no drugs designed to inhibit the upregulated CXCL or CCL genes. Hence, to reverse the CXCL and CCL family’s gene expression in BC, we turned to Connectivity analysis. Differentially expressed chemokines were analyzed using the L1000Cds2 server, and drugs and drug combinations leading to a reversal in the expression pattern of differentially regulated chemokines were obtained (Fig. 9, drug combinations not shown). The top three drugs leading to the reversal of gene expression in the opposite direction of that seen in BC are shown in Fig. 10. The top three drugs, i.e. Thioridazine, BRD-K16533489, and Pelitinib each has an overlap of 0.2857 with the reverse signature of CC and CXC chemokines in BC Furthermore, Pelitinib and Thioridazine may have a synergistic effect on restoring the gene expression pattern with an overlap of 0.4762. The 2D structure of drugs with the highest score was obtained from Pubchem35 and is depicted in Fig. 10.
The effect of drugs on differentially expressed CC and CXC chemokines present in the L1000Cds2 database. Input signature is highlighted in blue and red, depending on the direction of change of the respective cytokine in TCGA breast cancer data. The abscisa lists drugs and the effect of each drug on chemokines is demonstrated by red or blue, for either up- or down-regulation of chemokines in the cells (not shown) treated by the drug (dose not shown), respectively.
The 2D structure of top 3 drugs with signatures in the reverse of gene expression in BC patients. (a) BRD-K16533489, (b) Pelitinib, (c) Thioridazine.
Discussion
Considerable data support the notion that some chemokines may promote angiogenesis and tumor progression in BC, while some may inhibit the growth and metastasis of BC cells36. In the current study, we applied a bioinformatic approach to elucidate the prognostic values of the whole CC and CXC chemokine families in BC. We found that the expression levels of CCL1/5/7/11/17/19/20/22/25 and CXCL9/10/11/13 in BC samples were remarkably increased compared to normal specimens. On the other hand, transcription levels of CCL2/3/4/8/13/14/15/16/18/21/23/24/28 and CXCL2/3/4/6/7/8/12/17 were significantly decreased in BC tissues.
Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of the CC and CXC chemokines mRNA expression in BC patients. Our analyses revealed that enhanced expression of CCL4 is associated with favorable OS and RFS. We also found that the expression of CCL4 was higher in the basal-like subtype than the non-basal-like subtype. Unlike our findings, Sasaki et al. determined that overexpression of CCL4 in BC patients was correlated with shorter RFS. They also demonstrated that cancer cell-derived CCL4 could promote BC metastasis to the bone by bonding to the CCR5 expressed by intra-bone fibroblasts. They consequently suggested that CCL4 might display a role as a pro-metastatic mediator in the BC37. In the current study, we found that the high mRNA expression of CCL5 is notably associated with better OS and RFS. A growing body of evidence indicates the implication of the increased CCL5 level in BC progression and tumor metastasis promotion38,39,40,41,42. In line with our findings, Yaal-Hahoshen et al. identified the elevated expression of CCL5 in the advanced SBR grade of BC43. Furthermore, higher levels of CCL5 were observed in the triple-negative BC (TNBC) subtype compared to non-TNBC subtypes41,44,45, which is consistent with our findings. We identified that downregulation of CCL14 in BC patients is notably correlated with shorter OS and RFS, which is in line with previous findings46. Moreover, the CCL14 expression level was decreased with the advancement of SBR grade in BC patients. Li et al., in their study in 2011, provided clues that CCL14 might promote BC angiogenesis and metastasis47.
Moreover, our results showed that overexpression of CCL19 in BC patients correlated with better OS and RFS. Recently CCL19/CCR7 axis has been identified to modulate EMT and mediate tumor cell invasion and migration through the AKT signaling pathway in BC48. In addition, the high expression levels of CCL19 were found to predict a better prognosis49. Our results, like previously reported findings50, indicated that low expression of CCL21 is associated with a worse OS and RFS. CCL21 was identified to enhance the immunogenicity in BC51, while later data demonstrated that it implicates in lymphangiogenesis and metastasis52.
In agreement with the findings of Thomas et al.45, we observed that CCL22 expression level is highest in the HER2 subtype compared to other subtypes, and also the increased transcription level of CCL22 is associated with longer OS and RFS. Unlike these findings, Li et al. indicated that high expression of CCL22 is correlated with poor OS53. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that higher expression of CCL24 is correlated with shorter OS. Jin et al. provided clues for the contribution of the CCL24 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancy through the RhoB-VEGFA-VEGFR2 angiogenesis pathway. They also indicated that upregulation of CCL24 in HCC patients was associated with shorter OS54.
CXCL8, also known as IL-8, is a pro-inflammatory cytokine implicating in BC cell invasion and angiogenesis and promoting metastasis through the recruitment of neutrophils41,55,56. Higher expression of CXCL8 has been found to be associated with shorter OS in BC patients, representing a promising prognostic biomarker for OS57,58,59. Similarly, we observed an association between elevated expression of CXCL8 and shorter OS and RFS in BC patients. Consistent with our results, increased CXCL8 has been detected in the basal-like subtype41, and CXCL8 expression was also enhanced with the advancement of SBR grade57. There seem to be conflicting reports on the roles of the CXCL9 chemokine within the BC. It has been demonstrated that CXCL9-expressing tumor cells reduced tumor growth and lung metastases and prolonged survival via the recruitment of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells in murine breast cancer models60. Conversely, recent evidence has shown that CXCL9 promotes tumor growth and lung metastases61. Elevated CXCL9 level has been proved to be a good prognostic biomarker for the TNBC subgroup, while in the luminal A subgroup of patients, CXCL9 overexpression was correlated with poor prognostic characteristics62. Moreover, high CXCL9 expression has been related to improved survival in ER-negative BC63. We observed that higher CXCL9 expression appears to be associated with prolonged OS. Also, we found higher CXCL9 levels in patients with higher SBR grades. More importantly, a high expression level of CXCL9 was significantly linked to lymphocytes infiltration and better response to chemotherapy in BC patients64,65,66,67.
CXCL12 was proposed to enhance angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis in BC68,69,70,71. However, CXCR4/CXCL12 axis was later found to be implicated in B cell-mediated killing of BC cells72. Moreover, Yu et al. demonstrated that enhanced CXCL12 in BC cells suppresses tumor metastasis to the lung and predicts a better prognosis73. Furthermore, we identified that CXCL12 expression was decreased with the advancement of SBR grade. In the case of prognosis, the results are conflicting. In an earlier study, Kang et al. indicated an inverse correlation between the expression level of CXCL12 and OS of BC patients68, while later data reported a positive correlation57,74. Similarly, we found that an elevated level of CXCL12 was correlated with prolonged OS and RFS. In contrast to these findings, Liu et al. showed that mRNA expression of CXCL12 was not associated with the OS75. CXCL13 is reportedly involved in BC progression and metastasis76,77,78. Xu et al. proposed that the mechanism underlying the promoting effect of CXCL13 on BC progression might be related to CXCR5/ERK pathway79. In line with our findings, the expression of CXCL13 was demonstrated to be enhanced in grade 2/380. In the current study, the basal-like subgroup showed a dramatically higher CXCL13 level compared to other subgroups. A recent study has revealed that a high level of CXCL13 indicated longer OS and DFS in the luminal-HER2 patients62. Also, we identified that elevated CXCL13 conferred prolonged OS in BC patients. It has been revealed that CXCL14 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in BC, and its protein level positively associates with OS81. Conversely, other data have shown that CXCL14 promotes BC tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis82,83,84. Moreover, Sjoberg et al. found that CXCL14 expression level was notably associated with reduced RFS85. However, Chen et al. indicated that high CXCL14 was related to better OS and favorable RFS57, which is in conformance with our findings. Additionally, our data in the current study identified that CXCL14 expression is negatively related to SBR grade.
Furthermore, we found that patients with advanced SBR grades tended to express higher mRNA levels of CCL8/18/20 and CXCL10/11/17. Moreover, the transcriptional levels of CCL2/3/7/8/13/18/20 and CXCL1/3/5/10/11/16 were found to be higher in the basal-like subtype in comparison to the HER2, luminal A/B, and normal breast-like subgroups. However, the mRNA levels of CCL11 and CXCL17 were obviously highest in the HER2 subtype compared to the others.
It is well documented that DNA methylation implicates in tumorigenesis86. DNA methylation of CC and CXC chemokines including CCL2, CCL5, CXCL2, CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL12, CXCL14 has been identified in various cancers87,88,89,90,91,92. CXCL12 hypermethylation has been reported to be associated with histologically advanced disease, metastases, and a poor chance of survival in BC patients92,93,94,95. Also, we identified that single CpG methylation of CC and CXC chemokines was associated with prognosis in BC patients.
In the current study, we found that the high expression of MIR-4270, MIR-4441, and MIR-3065-5p was remarkably correlated with shorter OS, while the elevated expression of MIR-542-3p was associated with better OS in BC patients. A growing body of evidence has revealed that miR-542-3p plays a role as a tumor suppressor in various cancers, including ovarian and breast cancer96,97,98,99. Palkina et al. found that miR 3065-5p has antitumor impacts on melanoma cells100.
Chemokines are well known to modulate immune cell trafficking101. There is considerable data to support the importance of immune cell infiltration in tumor progression, which could be modulated by CC and CXC chemokines secreted by tumor and stromal cells102. It was previously reported that in murine breast cancer models, CXCL9-expressing tumor cells reduced tumor growth and lung metastases through the recruitment of T cells60. According to the data obtained from TIMER, we found that CCL3 expression levels showed the highest correlation with infiltration abundances of macrophage cells in BC among CC chemokines. Additionally, we found that CCL4 expression was mainly correlated with increased infiltration abundances of neutrophils and dendritic cells. Also, infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells was the most correlated with the CCL5 expression levels. Besides, expression levels of CCL19 had the highest association with B cell infiltration. We found that infiltration of B cell, CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, and dendritic cells was mainly correlated with the CXCL9 expression levels. Additionally, infiltration abundances of neutrophils and macrophages had the highest association with CXCL10 and CXCL12 expression levels, respectively. We also found drugs that can restore the expression of the studied chemokines in BC patients. Further investigations of these drugs on BC cell lines are highly advised.
In summary, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis using public databases to evaluate the mRNA expression of the whole CC and CXC chemokines and their potential prognostic values in BC. Further in vitro and in vivo investigations are required to validate our findings. We hope our findings can provide a new point of view that may help the clinical application of CC and CXC chemokines as prognostic biomarkers in BC in the near future.
Data availability
All raw data are publicly available from corresponding databases. Processed data are available on reasonable request from corresponding author.
References
Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).
Sørlie, T. et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10869–10874 (2001).
Esteva, F. J., Hubbard-Lucey, V. M., Tang, J. & Pusztai, L. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy combinations in metastatic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 20, e175–e186 (2019).
Maruthanila, V. L., Elancheran, R., Kunnumakkara, A. B., Kabilan, S. & Kotoky, J. Recent development of targeted approaches for the treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 24, 191–219 (2017).
García-Aranda, M. & Redondo, M. Immunotherapy: a challenge of breast cancer treatment. Cancers (Basel) 11, 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121822 (2019).
Chow, M. T. & Luster, A. D. Chemokines in cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1125–1131 (2014).
Bikfalvi, A. & Billottet, C. The CC and CXC chemokines: major regulators of tumor progression and the tumor microenvironment. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 318, C542–C554 (2020).
Zlotnik, A., Burkhardt, A. M. & Homey, B. Homeostatic chemokine receptors and organ-specific metastasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 597–606 (2011).
Zlotnik, A., Yoshie, O. & Nomiyama, H. The chemokine and chemokine receptor superfamilies and their molecular evolution. Genome Biol. 7, 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-243 (2006).
Chen, K. et al. Chemokines in homeostasis and diseases. Cell Mol. Immunol. 15, 324–334 (2018).
Mollica Poeta, V., Massara, M., Capucetti, A. & Bonecchi, R. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new targets for cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 10, 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00379 (2019).
Cabrero-de Las Heras, S. & Martínez-Balibrea, E. CXC family of chemokines as prognostic or predictive biomarkers and possible drug targets in colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 24, 4738–4749 (2018).
Zhao, Q. Q. et al. Gene expression and methylation profiles identified CXCL3 and CXCL8 as key genes for diagnosis and prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma. J. Cell Physiol. 235, 4902–4912 (2020).
Oladipo, O. et al. The expression and prognostic impact of CXC-chemokines in stage II and III colorectal cancer epithelial and stromal tissue. Br. J. Cancer 104, 480–487 (2011).
Cao, Z. et al. Overexpression of Chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1 (CXCL1) associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 14, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-014-0086-8 (2014).
Spaks, A. et al. CXC chemokine ligand 4 (CXCL4) is predictor of tumour angiogenic activity and prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing surgical treatment. Biomarkers 21, 474–478 (2016).
Hwang, T. L. et al. CCL7 and CCL21 overexpression in gastric cancer is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 1249–1256 (2012).
Frick, V. O. et al. CCR6/CCL20 chemokine expression profile in distinct colorectal malignancies. Scand. J. Immunol. 78, 298–305 (2013).
Chandrashekar, D. S. et al. UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia 19, 649–658 (2017).
Győrffy, B. Survival analysis across the entire transcriptome identifies biomarkers with the highest prognostic power in breast cancer. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 4101–4109 (2021).
Jézéquel, P. et al. bc-GenExMiner 4.5: new mining module computes breast cancer differential gene expression analyses. Database (Oxford) 2021, 1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baab007 (2021).
Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, 269. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004088 (2013).
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2018).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinform. 14, 1–14 (2013).
Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucl. Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).
Xie, Z. et al. Gene set knowledge discovery with enrichr. Curr. Protoc. 1, e90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.90 (2021).
Modhukur, V. et al. MethSurv: a web tool to perform multivariable survival analysis using DNA methylation data. Epigenomics 10, 277–288 (2018).
Li, T. et al. TIMER: a web server for comprehensive analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Cancer Res. 77, e108–e110 (2017).
Li, B. et al. Comprehensive analyses of tumor immunity: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Genome Biol. 17, 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1028-7 (2016).
Barretina, J. et al. The cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 28(483), 603–607 (2012).
Whirl-Carrillo, M. et al. An evidence-based framework for evaluating pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110(3), 563–572 (2021).
Subramanian, A. et al. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell 171, 1437-1452.e17 (2017).
Kim, S. et al. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucl. Acids Res. 49, D1388–D1395 (2021).
Liu, H. et al. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: a new strategy for breast cancer therapy. Cancer Med. 9, 3786–3799 (2020).
Sasaki, S. et al. Essential roles of the interaction between cancer cell-derived chemokine, CCL4, and intra-bone CCR5-expressing fibroblasts in breast cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Lett. 378, 23–32 (2016).
Karnoub, A. E. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature 449, 557–563 (2007).
Gao, D., Rahbar, R. & Fish, E. N. CCL5 activation of CCR5 regulates cell metabolism to enhance proliferation of breast cancer cells. Open Biol. 6, 160122. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160122 (2016).
Velasco-Velázquez, M. et al. CCR5 antagonist blocks metastasis of basal breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 72, 3839–3850 (2012).
Liubomirski, Y. et al. Tumor-stroma-inflammation networks promote pro-metastatic chemokines and aggressiveness characteristics in triple-negative breast cancer. Front. Immunol. 10, 757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00757 (2019).
Aldinucci, D., Borghese, C. & Casagrande, N. The CCL5/CCR5 axis in cancer progression. Cancers 12, 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071765 (2020).
Yaal-Hahoshen, N. et al. The chemokine CCL5 as a potential prognostic factor predicting disease progression in stage II breast cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 4474–4480 (2006).
Lv, D., Zhang, Y., Kim, H.-J., Zhang, L. & Ma, X. CCL5 as a potential immunotherapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Mol. Immunol. 10, 303–310 (2013).
Thomas, J. K., Mir, H., Kapur, N., Bae, S. & Singh, S. CC chemokines are differentially expressed in breast cancer and are associated with disparity in overall survival. Sci. Rep. 9, 4014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40514-9 (2019).
Gu, Y. et al. CCL14 is a prognostic biomarker and correlates with immune infiltrates in hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 12, 784–807 (2020).
Li, Q. et al. Binding of the JmjC Demethylase JARID1B to LSD1/NuRD suppresses angiogenesis and metastasis in breast cancer cells by repressing chemokine CCL14. Cancer Res. 71, 6899–6908 (2011).
Xu, B., Zhou, M., Qiu, W., Ye, J. & Feng, Q. CCR7 mediates human breast cancer cell invasion, migration by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and suppressing apoptosis through AKT pathway. Cancer Med. 6, 1062–1071 (2017).
Jinyan, W. et al. CCL19 has potential to be a prognostic biomarker and a modulator of tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis based on TCGA database. Res Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-87457/v1 (2021).
Chen, B. et al. Bioinformatics identification of CCL8/21 as potential prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer microenvironment. Biosci. Rep. 40, BSR20202042. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20202042 (2020).
Wu, S. et al. CC chemokine ligand 21 enhances the immunogenicity of the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 upon assistance of TLR2. Carcinogenesis 32, 296–304 (2010).
Tutunea-Fatan, E., Majumder, M., Xin, X. & Lala, P. K. The role of CCL21/CCR7 chemokine axis in breast cancer-induced lymphangiogenesis. Mol. Cancer 14, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-015-0306-4 (2015).
Li, Y.-Q. et al. Tumor secretion of CCL22 activates intratumoral treg infiltration and is independent prognostic predictor of breast cancer. PLoS ONE 8, e76379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076379 (2013).
Jin, L. et al. CCL24 contributes to HCC malignancy via RhoB- VEGFA-VEGFR2 angiogenesis pathway and indicates poor prognosis. Oncotarget 8, 5135–5148 (2016).
Yao, C. et al. Interleukin-8 modulates growth and invasiveness of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 121, 1949–1957 (2007).
De Larco, J. E. et al. A potential role for interleukin-8 in the metastatic phenotype of breast carcinoma cells. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 639–646 (2001).
Chen, E. et al. Identification of potential therapeutic targets among CXC chemokines in breast tumor microenvironment using integrative bioinformatics analysis. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 45, 1731–1746 (2018).
Fang, Q. I. et al. Increased CXCL8 expression is negatively correlated with the overall survival of patients with ER-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 37, 4845–4852 (2017).
Milovanovic, J., Todorovic-Rakovic, N. & Abu Rabi, Z. The prognostic role of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and matrix metalloproteinases -2 and -9 in lymph node-negative untreated breast cancer patients. J. Buon. 18, 866–73 (2013).
Walser, T. C. et al. Immune-mediated modulation of breast cancer growth and metastasis by the chemokine Mig (CXCL9) in a murine model. J. Immunother. 30, 490–498 (2007).
Pein, M. et al. Metastasis-initiating cells induce and exploit a fibroblast niche to fuel malignant colonization of the lungs. Nat. Commun. 11, 1494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15188-x (2020).
Razis, E. et al. The role of CXCL13 and CXCL9 in early breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 20, e36–e53 (2020).
Liang, Y. K. et al. CXCL9 is a potential biomarker of immune infiltration associated with favorable prognosis in ER-negative breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 11, 710286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.710286 (2021).
Bronger, H. et al. Modulation of CXCR3 ligand secretion by prostaglandin E2 and cyclooxygenase inhibitors in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 14, R30. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3115 (2012).
Denkert, C. et al. Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 105–113 (2010).
Specht, K. et al. Expression profiling identifies genes that predict recurrence of breast cancer after adjuvant CMF-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 118, 45–56 (2009).
Lv, Y. et al. Immune cell infiltration-based characterization of triple-negative breast cancer predicts prognosis and chemotherapy response markers. Front. Genet. 12, 616469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.616469 (2021).
Kang, H. et al. Stromal cell derived factor-1: its influence on invasiveness and migration of breast cancer cells in vitro, and its association with prognosis and survival in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 7, R402–R410 (2005).
Hernandez, L., Magalhaes, M. A., Coniglio, S. J., Condeelis, J. S. & Segall, J. E. Opposing roles of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in breast cancer metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 13, R128. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3074 (2011).
Ray, P. et al. CXCL12-γ in primary tumors drives breast cancer metastasis. Oncogene 34, 2043–2051 (2015).
Boimel, P. J. et al. Contribution of CXCL12 secretion to invasion of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 14, R23. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3108 (2012).
Xia, Y. et al. IL-2 augments the therapeutic efficacy of adoptively transferred B cells which directly kill tumor cells via the CXCR4/CXCL12 and perforin pathways. Oncotarget 7, 60461–60474 (2016).
Yu, P. F. et al. Downregulation of CXCL12 in mesenchymal stromal cells by TGFβ promotes breast cancer metastasis. Oncogene 36, 840–849 (2017).
Mirisola, V. et al. CXCL12/SDF1 expression by breast cancers is an independent prognostic marker of disease-free and overall survival. Eur. J. Cancer 45, 2579–2587 (2009).
Liu, H. et al. Prognostic and clinicopathological value of CXCL12/SDF1 expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin. Chim. Acta 484, 72–80 (2018).
Jiang, L. et al. CXCL13/CXCR5 are potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis for breast cancer. J. Buon. 25, 2552–2561 (2020).
Biswas, S. et al. CXCL13-CXCR5 co-expression regulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells during lymph node metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 143, 265–276 (2014).
Panse, J. et al. Chemokine CXCL13 is overexpressed in the tumour tissue and in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer 99, 930–938 (2008).
Xu, L., Liang, Z., Li, S. & Ma, J. Signaling via the CXCR5/ERK pathway is mediated by CXCL13 in mice with breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 15, 9293–9298 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. The expression of CXCL13 and its relation to unfavorable clinical characteristics in young breast cancer. J. Transl. Med. 13, 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0521-1 (2015).
Gu, X. L. et al. Expression of CXCL14 and its anticancer role in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 135, 725–735 (2012).
Allinen, M. et al. Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 6, 17–32 (2004).
Augsten, M. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts expressing CXCL14 rely upon NOS1-derived nitric oxide signaling for their tumor-supporting properties. Cancer Res. 74, 2999–3010 (2014).
Sjöberg, E. et al. A novel ACKR2-dependent role of fibroblast-derived CXCL14 in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 3702–3717 (2019).
Sjöberg, E., Augsten, M., Bergh, J., Jirström, K. & Östman, A. Expression of the chemokine CXCL14 in the tumour stroma is an independent marker of survival in breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 114, 1117–1124 (2016).
Timp, W. & Feinberg, A. P. Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 497–510 (2013).
Zheng, Y., Wang, Z., Wei, S., Liu, Z. & Chen, G. Epigenetic silencing of chemokine CCL2 represses macrophage infiltration to potentiate tumor development in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 499, 148–163 (2021).
Dangaj, D. et al. Cooperation between constitutive and inducible chemokines enables T cell engraftment and immune attack in solid tumors. Cancer Cell 35, 885–900 (2019).
Subat, S. et al. Identification of genes and pathways, including the CXCL2 axis, altered by DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 675–684 (2019).
Cheng, S. H. et al. 4q loss is potentially an important genetic event in MM tumorigenesis: identification of a tumor suppressor gene regulated by promoter methylation at 4q13.3, platelet factor 4. Blood 109, 2089–99 (2007).
Tessema, M. et al. Re-expression of CXCL14, a common target for epigenetic silencing in lung cancer, induces tumor necrosis. Oncogene 29, 5159–5170 (2010).
Fridrichova, I. et al. CXCL12 and ADAM23 hypermethylation are associated with advanced breast cancers. Transl. Res. 165, 717–730 (2015).
Ramos, E. A. et al. Simultaneous CXCL12 and ESR1 CpG island hypermethylation correlates with poor prognosis in sporadic breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-23 (2010).
Zhou, W. et al. Down-regulation of CXCL12 mRNA expression by promoter hypermethylation and its association with metastatic progression in human breast carcinomas. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 135, 91–102 (2009).
Ramos, E. A. et al. Epigenetic changes of CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 as prognostic factors for sporadic breast cancer. PLoS ONE 6, e29461. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029461 (2011).
Li, J., Shao, W. & Feng, H. MiR-542-3p, a microRNA targeting CDK14, suppresses cell proliferation, invasiveness, and tumorigenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 110, 850–856 (2019).
Wu, H. X., Wang, G. M., Lu, X. & Zhang, L. miR-542-3p targets sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 and regulates cell proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 108–114 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. The abnormal expression of MicroRNA-542-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical significance. Dis. Mark. 2018, 3973250. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3973250 (2018).
Wang, X. P. et al. MicroRNA-542-3p functions as a tumor suppressor via directly targeting survivin in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 99, 817–824 (2018).
Palkina, N. et al. miR-204-5p and miR-3065-5p exert antitumor effects on melanoma cells. Oncol. Lett. 15, 8269–8280 (2018).
Nagarsheth, N., Wicha, M. S. & Zou, W. Chemokines in the cancer microenvironment and their relevance in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 559–572 (2017).
Kohli, K., Pillarisetty, V. G. & Kim, T. S. Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 29, 10–21 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.H. designed the study. H.H., Mar.M.M., Mad.M.M., and A.M. performed the research. H.H., Mar.M.M., and Mad.M.M. collected and analyzed the data. Mar.M.M. and Mad.M.M. Drafted the manuscript. H.H. outlined the methods and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and authenticated the submitted version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hozhabri, H., Moghaddam, M.M., Moghaddam, M.M. et al. A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis to identify potential prognostic biomarkers among CC and CXC chemokines in breast cancer. Sci Rep 12, 10374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14610-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14610-2
This article is cited by
-
Serum protein profiling reveals an inflammation signature as a predictor of early breast cancer survival
Breast Cancer Research (2024)
-
The role of CXCL family members in different diseases
Cell Death Discovery (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
