Introduction

Pancreatic carcinoma (PC) is one of the most fatal malignancies associated with a 5-year survival rate of 8%1. First presenting symptoms typically include abdominal or back pain, obstructive jaundice and weight loss. Currently, PC is mainly diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) and treated via surgery. It is poorly sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents. From early asymptomatic in most cases until tumor invasion to surrounding tissues or distance metastasis, approximately 80–85% of the patients have an advanced, un-resectable tumor at the time of diagnosis2. In this context, early diagnosis and accurate prognosis are of vital significance for effective management of PC.

MicroRNA (miRNA) is a class of small, non-coding RNA molecules with a size of 17–25 nucleotides3. It was first reported by Ambros and Ruvkun early in 19934. It is well believed that miRNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) can bind to the complementary sequences on the 3′-untranslated region of target messenger RNA (mRNA), leading to mRNA decay, translational repression and subsequent regulation of the growth and development of organisms5. Some scholars reported suppression of the overall expression of miRNA in tumor cells through 217 mammal samples6. miRNAs are important in initiation and progression of tumors by serving as tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes according to their functions7. Previous research found that miR-196a and miR-196b were barely expressed in normal tissues but exhibited increased expression in PC tissues. This demonstrated that miR-196a and miR-196b could be diagnostic biomarkers for PC8. Another study revealed that the expression levels of miR-574-5p, miR-1244, miR-145, miR-328, miR-26b and miR-4321 were associated with the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PC9. Based on the wide distribution of miRNA in human plasma, urine, saliva and their stable, non-invasive characteristics, miRNA are promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for tumors.

PC can escape by inhibiting immune checkpoints such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4(CTLA-4), which makes immunotherapy become one of the important treatment methods10. For PC, immune therapeutic schemes mainly are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer (ACT) and combinations with immunotherapeutic agents11. It was reported that miRNA could have cancer immunotherapeutic effect by inhibiting immune checkpoints, such as PD-L112. The mechanism of anti-tumor action of miRNA via immunotherapeutic pathways remains to be further explored.

In the current study, transcriptome data of PC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was performed using "WGCNA" package to screen key module genes. Immune-related miRNAs were screened out by Spearman correlation analysis and then analyzed by uni- and multi-variate COX regression to obtain immune-related miRNAs prognosis for OS of PC. A prognostic model was constructed based on the identified miRNAs and the performance of the model was validated by Kaplan–Meier (KM) curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, uni- and multi-variate COX regression analyses. A miRNA–mRNA interaction network was generated based on the target genes of the model miRNAs and the key module genes. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment (TME) and expression of immune checkpoints were performed and analyzed in subgroups stratified by the model-based risk scoring system. This study aims at providing evidence for further immune therapy and prognosis in patients with PC.

Methods

Data collection and processing

Expression data of miRNA and mRNA of PC, together with corresponding clinical information, were downloaded from TCGA-PAAD dataset (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov)13 (Fig. 1). According to survival data, 178 tumor samples (mRNA, miRNA) and 4 normal samples (mRNA) were eventually obtained.

Figure 1
figure 1

The flow chart.

WGCNA analysis for mRNA

R package "WGCNA" was used to construct a co-expression network to find the gene module highly associated with PC14. In short, the soft-thresholding power (β) that fitted the criterion of the approximate scale-free topology of the network (R2 = 0.9) was determined as 2. Minimum module size was set to 50. An adjacency matrix was generated and then converted to a topological overlap matrix (TOM). Average linkage hierarchical clustering was performed based on the differential TOM measures to classify genes of similar expression patterns into a gene module. P value in t test was calculated and visualized.

Screening of immune-related miRNAs prognosis for PC

Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was performed in samples of the TCGA-PAAD dataset to obtain immune scores of M13664 (immune system process) and M19817 (immune response) gene sets based on the MSigDB database (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp)15,16,17. Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to screen immune score-related miRNA (|R|> 0.3, P < 0.05), which were then intersected with the prognostic miRNAs analyzed by uni-variate analysis to obtain prognostic immune-related miRNAs.

Construction and validation of immune-related miRNA prognostic model

Immune-related miRNAs prognosis for OS of PC were screened by uni-variate analysis. Further multi-variate COX regression analysis was performed to identify signature miRNAs and construct a miRNA prognostic model(R package "survival")18. A risk scoring system was established based on the model and defined as a sum of the product of expression level of each miRNA and corresponding regression coefficient. Each patient was scored and divided into two cohorts by taking the median risk score as the threshold. KM survival analysis was applied to study the prognostic significance of the risk score19. ROC curve and distribution plot of survival status in the two cohorts were generated to assess the accuracy of the risk score in prognosis(R package "survivalROC")20. Independence of the risk score in prognosis was evaluated using uni- and multi-variate analyses, with the involvement of some other significant clinical features.

Establishment of immune-related miRNA–mRNA interaction network

Target genes for the model miRNAs were predicted using the miRDB, miRTarBase and Target Scan databases respectively21,22,23. The predicted genes were then intersected with the genes in the key module identified by WGCNA. A miRNA–mRNA interaction network was then generated and visualized by Cytoscape3.8.0. Different regulatory relationships were distinguished by colors24.

Immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint

CIBERSORT is a deconvolution algorithm developed by Bindea G et al. It can estimate the cell composition and quantify the abundance of specific cell groups in a complex environment using standardized gene expression data25. Here, transcriptome data derived from the TCGA-PAAD database were sorted and normalized. Relative abundance of infiltration of 22 immune cells in TME was estimated based on the normalized data using TIMER to study the relationship between the risk score and immune cell infiltration. Since tumor immune therapy has become more popular, expression of immune checkpoint genes in two groups was compared to study the sensitivity of patients to immune therapy.

GSEA

GSEA was performed using the JAVA GSEA 3.0 (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp), by taking the "c2.cp.kegg.v7.4.symbols.gmt" as the reference gene set.

Statistical analysis

R 4.1.2 and Strawberry Perl fulfilled all statistical analyses of the study. R package "WGCNA" was used to find key module of PC. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to screen immune-related miRNAs. The model prognostic was established based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Both the univariate and the multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed with the “survival” package. The ROC curves were drawn by the package of “survivalROC” in R. Cytoscape3.8.0 software was applied to generate miRNA–mRNA interaction network. TIMER analysis was carried out to study the abundance of immune infiltrates in TME of PC. Expression levels of immune checkpoint genes in subgroups stratified by the model were compared by Wilcoxon test. GSEA was performed to analyze the enriched signaling pathways between subgroups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Key module identified by WGCNA

Following WGCNA, 13 gene modules were initially obtained. Further splicing based on Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated 10 gene modules eventually, which were displayed in a Heat map (Fig. 2). The Brown module (r = 0.2, P = 0.07) and Green module (r = − 0.26, P = 4e − 04) were found to be highly associated with PC. Specifically, the Brown module containing 1,826 genes was positively associated with PC, while the Green module composed of 1276 genes was negatively associated with PC. Genes of the two modules were selected for further analysis.

Figure 2
figure 2

WGCNA identification of cancer-associated mRNA modules in PC. (A) Cluster dendrogram of the co-expression network modules created according to the dissimilarity of the topological overlap in the selected mRNAs. (B) Shear clustering module. (C) Analysis of relationships between genes in modules between PC and normal samples. The green and brown modules were the most tumor-specific modules.

Screening of immune-related miRNAs

Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated, and a total of 700 immune-related miRNAs were obtained.

Construction and validation of immune-related miRNA prognostic model

700 immune-related miRNAs were randomly divided into train and test sets. Uni-variate COX regression analysis was performed to obtain 20 candidate immune-related miRNAs of prognostic significance in PC (Table 1). Subsequently, multi-variate COX regression models were established and a 7-miRNA based prognostic model was identified (Table 2). A risk score was accordingly established and formulated as miR-550a-3-5p*-0.472400389 + miR-3613-5p*-0.541428145 + miR-221-3p*0.364211355 + miR-424-5p*0.446023047 + miR-491-3p*-0.318762586 + miR-1179*-0.202029941 + miR-3614-3p*0.3625878. Patient samples were divided into two cohorts according to the median risk score. KM survival curves of the 7 model miRNAs were generated. It was found that all these 7 miRNAs were closely associated with the OS of patients, including miR-550a-3-5p, miR-3613-5p, miR-491-3p and miR-1179 showing a negative correlation and miR-221-3p, miR-424-5p and miR-3614-3p showing a positive correlation (Fig. 3). KM survival analysis was also performed in the high- and low-risk cohorts of the train and test sets respectively. Significant difference in OS of the two groups in both sets was observed (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4). AUC values of the ROC curves for survival were 0.715, 0.754 and 0.678 respectively, demonstrating high accuracy of the performance of the model (Fig. 5). Additionally, distribution plot of the survival status of patients in the two groups revealed an increased number of death with the increase of risk score (Fig. 6). Finally, the risk score was detected to be prognosis for OS of PC as detected by uni-variate analysis (P < 0.001). According to P < 0.2, further multi-variate analysis indicated that the risk score was independent of other factors in prognosis of PC (P < 0.001) (Fig. 7).

Table 1 Results of univariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic model.
Table 2 Results of multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic model.
Figure 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier survival curve of 7-immune-related prognostic miRNA. According to the median expression of miRNAs, patients were divided into high-expression groups and low-expression groups. (A) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-221-3p; (B) KM analysi for patients with hsa-miR-424-5p; (C) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-491-3p; (D) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-550a-3-5p; (E) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-1179; (F) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-3613-5p; (G) KM analysis for patients with hsa-miR-3614-3p.

Figure 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier analysis for the 7-immune-related prognostic miRNA signature in PC. (A) KM analysis in the the whole set; (B) testing; (C) training set.

Figure 5
figure 5

ROC analysis based on time for the 7-immune-related prognostic miRNA signature in PC. (A) ROC analysis in the whole set; (B) testing set; (C) the training set.

Figure 6
figure 6

Survival status based on time for the 7-immune-related prognostic miRNA signature in PC. (A) survival status analysis in the whole set; (B) testing set; (C) the training set.

Figure 7
figure 7

Independent prognostic analysis. (A) Forest plot of univariate; (B) multivariate.Cox regression analysis showed the risk score was an independent risk factor compared with other clinical features.

Establishment of immune-related miRNA–mRNA interaction network

Target genes for the model miRNAs were predicted using the miRDB, miRTarBase and TargetScan databases respectively. The intersected genes were selected for further analysis, including 100 mRNAs for miR-221-3p, 272 mRNAs for miR-424-5p, 15 mRNAs for miR-491-3p, 14 mRNAs for miR-550a-3-5p, 11 mRNAs for miR-1179, 11 mRNAs for miR-3613-5p, and 7 mRNAs for miR-3614-3p (Fig. 8). After intersection with the key module genes in WGCNA, a total of 99 genes were obtained and considered significantly associated with the immunity and prognosis of PC (Fig. 9). A miRNA–mRNA interaction network was constructed based on the 7 model miRNAs and 99 mRNAs, which the red represented a positive correlation and the blue represented a negative correlation (Fig. 10).

Figure 8
figure 8

miRNA target Venn. (A) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-221-3p; (B) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-424-5p; (C) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-491-3p; (D) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-550a-3-5p; (E) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-1179; (F) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-3613-5p; (G) Venn diagram of target genes for hsa-miR-3614-3p.

Figure 9
figure 9

mRNA Venn.

Figure 10
figure 10

miRNA–mRNA network. Red denoted up-regulated; blue denoted down-regulated.

Immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint

Composition of immune cell subgroups in TME of the high- and low-risk groups was analyzed and the infiltration abundance was displayed by a Heat map (Fig. 11). Infiltration of dendritic cells was demonstrated important between the two groups. Moreover, expression of immune checkpoint genes was examined. It was found that the risk score was associated with expression levels of TNFSF9, TNFRSF9, KIR3DL1, HAVCR2, CD276, especially CD80 (Fig. 12).

Figure 11
figure 11

Inference of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. (A) CIBERSORT was used to calculate the levels of 22 tumor infiltrating immune cells in PC patients; (B) association of risk score and immune cells infiltration; (C) differences in the proportion of 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cells between the high and low risk groups (*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001).

Figure 12
figure 12

Differences between high and low risk groups in immune checkpoints.

GSEA for target genes of the model miRNAs

By GSEA, the gene set at high risk was mainly involved in the pathways of cell cycle, chronic myeloid leukemia, prostate cancer, small cell lung cancer,steroid hormone biosynthesis. In the meantime, the gene set at low risk was predominantly associated with pathways involved in steroid hormone biosynthesis,calcium signaling pathway,long term potentiation,maturity onset diabetes of the young,neuroactive ligand receptor interaction (Fig. 13).

Figure 13
figure 13

GSEA analysis. (A) GSEA analysis of high risk groups; (B) GSEA analysis of low risk groups.

Discussion

This study, for the first time, constructed a prognostic model using immune-related miRNAs and validated its accurate, potent performance. We firstly analyzed the key modules associated with prognosis of PC using WGCNA, and then adopted differential analysis to obtain 1826 up-regulated and 1276 down-regulated genes in PC comparing with normal tissues. Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated and 700 immune-related miRNAs were found. Uni- and multi-variate COX regression analyses were performed to screen immune-related miRNA associated with OS. Eventually, a 7-miRNA-based prognostic model for PC was generated and a model-based risk scoring system was established with excellent performance detected by KM, ROC, distribution plot of survival status in subgroups, and uni- and multi-variate COX regression analyses. Furthermore, a miRNA–mRNA network was built using the Cytoscape3.8.0 software, according to the 99 target genes obtained from the predicted mRNAs of the 7 model miRNAs and key module genes. Moreover, immune cell infiltration was analyzed using the TIMER in the subgroups stratified by the model-based risk score, and dendritic cells were found as the most significantly different immune infiltrate in TME of the subgroups. Wilcoxon test also indicated correlation of the risk score with expression of immune checkpoint genes, including TNFSF9, TNFRSF9, KIR3DL1, HAVCR2, CD276, especially CD80. GSEA showed the remarkably enriched signaling pathways in the two subgroups.

There have been multiple studies devoted to constructing prognostic models for PC. For instance, Weng W et al.26 established a prognostic model for PC using 14 significant mRNAs; Yan et al.27 reported a 4-gene-based prognostic model for PC according to the transcriptome data; Liu et al.28 constructed a 5-mRNA prognostic model for PC, which was immune-associated; Chen and Jia29,30 obtained a prognostic model based on miRNAs.

Currently, prognostic miRNAs for PC have been extensively studied. Guo et al.31 reported that high expression levels of miR-21, miR-212, miR-675, miR-142-5p, miR-204 and low expression levels of miR-148a, miR-187, let-7g were associated with poor prognosis of PC. In that study, they also found several other miRNAs of prognostic significance, including miR-30a-3p, miR-105, miR-127, miR-187, miR-452, miR-518a-2, miR-155, miR-203, miR-210, miR-222, miR-200c, miR-302 and miR-15a. Tesfaye et al.32 revealed that the down-regulation of miR-183, miR-34a and the up-regulation of miR-1290, miR-155, miR-203, miR-222, miR-10b predicted a poor survival outcome of PC. Additionally, high expression levels of miR-142-5p, miR-21 led to significantly prolonged survival in patients with PC, and the miRNAs involved in p53, COX2 pathways were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis as well. Gablo et al.33 confirmed miR-21 as an oncogene in PC and revealed that increased expression of miR-21 and miR155 was associated with the decline in survival, liver metastasis, lymph node status and increased resistance to Gemcitabine.

In the current study, we successfully established a prognostic model using 7 immune-related miRNAs. Lu et al.34 found that expression of miR-550a in severe acute pancreatitis was down-regulated in patients combining with acute lung injury compared with patients without acute lung injury. Qin et al.35 revealed that miR-3613-5p was prognostic for renal clear cell carcinoma. Ma et al.36 also reported miR-3613-5p as a prognostic biomarker for pancreatic carcinoma and found that the target genes of miR-3613-5p might be correlated with the p53 signaling pathway. Research also found that miR-3613-5p was a key miRNA in cell malignancy of liver cancer induced by aflatoxin B137. Wang et al.38 found that miR-221-3p was independent of the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while Wang et al.39 reported the key role of miR-221-3p in thyroid cancer. Moreover, Fang et al.40 established a prognostic model for breast cancer based on 13 miRNAs including miR-221-3p. Abak et al.41 analyzed breast biopsy samples and found increased expression of miR-221-3p in tumor tissue compared to that in adjacent normal tissue. Xie et al.42 adopted high-throughput sequencing from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in small cell osteosarcoma and detected dysregulation of miR-221-3p. Kandhavelu et al.43 found that miR-424-5p was associated with 10 biomarkers of colon carcinoma, while only two of them, including microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2) and cyclin gene (CCN) D1, were experimentally validated. Liang et al.44 identified miR-424-5p as a potential prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer. In the meantime, Liu et al.45 experimentally validated that the up-regulation of miR-424-5p induced by astragaloside IV could inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and angiogenesis in gastric cancer, thereby to play a role in treatment of this cancer. Wang et al.46 found and validated the role of miR-424-5p as a factor in prognosis of HCC. Xu et al.47 also reported miR-424-5p played a vital role in onset of bile duct carcinoma. Additionally, miR-424-5p might reverse the progression of thyroid cancer via regulating clusterin (CLU) and apolipoprotein (APO)48. Ranjha et al.49 found decreased expression of miR-491-3p in ulcerative colitis located in the rectal sigmoid colon region than expression in ulcerative colitis located in the ascending colon. circANKRD36 might interact with miR-3614-3p to participate in Type 2 Diabetes and inflammation, supporting their role as potential biomarkers50. miR-1179 inhibited the in vivo growth of PC by down-regulating the expression of E2F transcription factor 551. Moreover, miR-1179 could suppress the growth and invasion of thyroid, gastric, esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung, cervical, breast, and nasopharyngeal carcinomas via regulating downstream target genes52,53,54,55,56,57,58.

To conclude, this is the first study that constructed a prognostic model for PC using immune-related miRNAs, aiming to provide a new direction for clinical prognosis of PC. The current study still has some deficiencies, such as lack of validation by molecular biology or relevant clinical trials. Additionally, the miR-491-3p and miR-550a-3-5p have not been fully studied in the field of tumor, requiring further in-depth research.