Abstract
The naticid snail Laguncula pulchella is an invasive species that preys on clams in tidal flats and has serious impacts on clam fisheries in Japan. Laguncula pulchella burrow in sand, but often crawl on sediment surfaces during low tide. We investigated seasonal changes in the abundance and sex ratio of crawling L. pulchella during the daytime at Matsukawaura Lagoon, Japan, from March to October from 2015 to 2019. The density of crawling individuals peaked in July. The sex ratio of crawling individuals varied with months and years but was significantly biased towards males during the main copulation period (July–August); males accounted for 77–98% of the mature crawling individuals (≥ 25 mm shell height). The somatic condition of mature males declined from June to August, whereas that of females was constant during this period. These results indicate that mature males actively come to the sand surface during low tide to search for females for copulation from July to August. Fishermen make efforts to remove crawling individuals in summer, but the male-biased sex ratio must also be considered for effective population control of this species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Invasive species are a threat to biodiversity, and their control is an important issue in ecosystem conservation1,2,3. To reduce the impact of invasive species on native species, eradication of the alien species is ideal but is difficult for marine organisms4. Detailed biological knowledge of the target species is essential for efficient and effective eradication, even though successful cases of invasive species management were not necessarily attributed to the population biological research5.
Naticid gastropods (moonsnails) are top predators of tidal flat ecosystems that prey upon clams and other gastropods6,7,8. Their behavioral patterns are important topics in the conservation of clams and the management of tidal flat ecosystems. Naticids burrow in the sand and some species crawl on the sand surface, thereby leaving trails that enable humans to identify the locations of burrowing individuals9,10. The crawling behavior of naticids on the sediment surface is known to be related to foraging. For example, Natica unifasciata crawls on mud flats for foraging at low tide11,12. Savazzi and Reyment10 associated the crawling behavior of naticids in an exposed sandy flat, with prey capture and defined it as "subaerial hunting". This behavior has also been observed in Notocochlis gualteriana (Savazzi and Reyment10) and Paratectonatica tigrina13. However, detailed information, such as the seasonal frequency of crawling behavior and ecological significance of that behavior, is still lacking for naticids.
The naticid Laguncula pulchella (formerly described as Euspira fortunei) is an invasive species in northern Japan. This species was introduced to Japan in the late 1990s14 when it was unintentionally mixed with the imported asari (Manila) clam Ruditapes philippinarum and released into tidal flats. In Matsukawaura Lagoon, northern Japan, L. pulchella was first found in 2002 and thereafter its population rapidly increased and remained at a high level since 200415. Its predation impacts on the asari clam and other bivalves have been of serious concern14,16,17,18,19,20. Laguncula pulchella bury themselves in sediments and appear on tidal flats at low tide17; they crawl on the sand surface (Fig. 1a) for ~ 30 min and thereafter bury themselves in the sand, leaving prominent trails. Based on this habit, the extermination of crawling individuals has been carried out by fishermen and local people. Fishermen have made efforts to manually remove the crawling individuals and egg collars of L. pulchella in Matsukawaura Lagoon during summer and autumn, respectively, since 2004. However, the efforts did not lead to a marked decline in the L. pulchella population15,21, because many individuals remained buried. Biological significance of the crawling of L. pulchella on the sediment surface should be understood for the efficient extermination. They have the size preference of prey clams22,23, and therefore crawling is effective to search prey in a wide area, although L. pulchella can capture prey in the substratum and bore drillholes on the clam shells24. Nonetheless, it is still unclear whether L. pulchella come to the sand surface only for hunting.
In northern Japan, L. pulchella copulates mainly in July and August, with a male mounting on top of a female (shell mounting; Fig. 1b)17. The sexes are fixed in naticids25. The initial maturation of females occurs from 2 years of age at a shell height of ≥ 25 mm17. Females can store sperm17 and lay egg collars between September and October26. Juveniles hatch from egg collars 30–40 days after egg laying27. Fishermen have continued removing L. pulchella to reduce predation on asari clams, but a population decline in L. pulchella has not been observed15. To achieve better management of this predatory gastropod and conservation of prey clams, the frequency and ecological importance of the crawling behavior of L. pulchella should be understood.
This study aimed to examine seasonal changes in the abundance of crawling individuals of an infaunal naticid, L. pulchella, on tidal flats in Matsukawaura Lagoon, northern Japan. Specifically, we focused on the abundance and sex ratio of crawling individuals because crawling behavior may vary between males and females or between seasons. We tested the null hypothesis that the sex ratio of crawling individuals was consistently 1:1 between males and females, irrespective of season. Furthermore, the shell size and somatic condition of crawling individuals were investigated to elucidate sexual differences in biological characteristics.
Results
Density and shell size of the crawling L. pulchella individuals
The density of crawling L. pulchella individuals was high (2–17 individuals/100 m2) from June to October (Fig. 2a). The highest density was observed in July, except in 2016. Pairs that exhibited shell mounting were not observed between April and June, whereas the highest number of pairs was observed in July (Fig. 2b).
The shell height (SH, mm; Fig. 1c) of crawling L. pulchella was significantly larger in females (7–51 mm, median = 37.0 mm; n = 1073) than in males (8–49 mm, median = 33.6 mm; n = 1766; Mann–Whitney U test, U = 1,228,774, P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals ≥ 35 mm was greater in females (63.5%) than males (36.0%, Fig. 3), and the frequency distribution was significantly different between the sexes (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, D = 0.34, P < 0.001).
Sex ratio
Of the 2566 crawling individuals ≥ 25 mm SH that were collected from the lagoon and sexed throughout the study period, females and males comprised 35.9% (922 individuals) and 64.1% (1644 individuals), respectively. The sex ratio varied between months and years (Fig. 4), but it was consistently biased towards males in July and August for each year (binomial test, P < 0.001 for all cases). The positive coefficients in July and August in the GLMM (P < 0.001, Table 1) indicated a greater proportion of males in these months than in March. During other months, the proportion of females was often greater than that of males (Fig. 4), and a significant difference in the sex ratio from March was observed for May (P < 0.01, Table 1). The sex ratio did not differ between day and night (Table 1).
Somatic condition
The body mass index (BMI) was determined for 429 females and 717 males (both with SH ≥ 25 mm). The BMI was consistently lower in males than in females (Fig. 5, ESM Fig. S1, Table 2). The BMI of males gradually decreased from June to October, whereas that of females seemed to be constant from June to September and then markedly decreased from September to October (Fig. 5). The selected GLMM indicated that the BMI of females did not differ between months from June to September, but it was significantly lower in October (Table 2, P < 0.001), whereas the BMI of males in August was significantly lower than that in June (P < 0.001).
Discussion
The present study is the first to elucidate that the sex ratio of crawling L. pulchella individuals was biased towards males from July to August, during which crawling individuals were abundant. We actually observed an individual chasing and mounting another individual in July 2017, and the abundance of mounting pairs also increased from June to July in 2017 and 2019. These findings strongly suggest that males appear on the sand surface to search for mates for copulation. Crawling behavior enables males to successfully encounter a mate. As such, crawling behavior is likely to be for both hunting and mating.
The emergence of naticids on the sediment surface is generally considered a hunting behavior10,12. However, if naticid snails only came to the surface for hunting, fewer snails should be observed crawling. Naticid drilling takes a relatively long time; for e.g., Neverita lewisii completes its feeding at a rate of ~ 0.1 clams per day28,29. A previous field experiment revealed that the L. pulchella individual consumes asari clams at a rate of ≤ 0.36 prey per day18. Based on the two assumptions that all individuals keep foraging (searching, handling, and consuming prey) and that the emergence of individuals on the sediment surface is necessary to capture prey, we concluded that each individual should come to the sand surface at a frequency of once every 3 days. In other words, the number of crawling individuals should be equivalent to almost one-third of the entire population. However, considering that L. pulchella can capture prey and consume it in the substratum18,24, the proportion of crawling individuals to the total number of individuals should be small. Actually, the density of crawling individuals (< 0.18 individuals m−2, Fig. 2) was very low, compared to that of buried L. pulchella individuals (0.4–1.2 individuals m−2 sieved by a 9 mm mesh in Matsukawaura Lagoon15 or 1.1–13.7 individuals m−2 sieved by a 2 mm mesh in Tona coast19).
Females may cease to appear on the sand surface during the copulation period. In 2016, the densities of crawling females, as determined by multiplying the proportion of females and density of crawling individuals, were 2.8, 0.4, and 0.3 individuals per 100 m2 in June, July, and August, respectively, which were markedly smaller than those of males (3.9, 8.1, and 3.6 individuals, respectively). Females might choose to remain in the sand during July and August, as females can store sperm17,26 and the cost of mating is high30. However, the feeding activity of females would not be reduced from June to September because of the constant BMI; the decrease in BMI of females in October is probably attributed to egg collar production. Additionally, the sex ratio was not biased towards males for small individuals (both crawling and burrowing) or burrowing mature individuals in July: we collected 14 females and 19 males of crawling small individuals (12–25 mm SH), 17 females and 19 males of buried mature individuals (buried without trails; 27–50 mm SH), and 4 females and 3 males of buried small individuals (16–23 mm SH) in July 2018, and no significant sex bias was observed in any of the cases (P > 0.48). This result indicated that only mature males notably increased their crawling activity in July. Another possible explanation for why crawling females were less abundant is that mature females minimize energy loss by remaining in the sand under high aerial temperatures during July and August. Such sex-specific responses to aerial temperature have been observed in another intertidal gastropod Nucella ostrina31.
It is unclear whether males come to the sand surface only for copulation in summer. Males, like females, might continue their foraging in July and August as we observed that some crawling individuals started capturing prey clams during our field surveys in July and August, although no quantitative evaluation was carried out in the present study. However, if crawling males capture prey and feed on it, it may be disadvantageous from the viewpoint of mating success because it takes around 3 days to consume a clam18. Thus, it is expected that males will prioritize mating over foraging from July to August. In general, mating behavior is more energy-consuming than non-mating behavior32. The decreasing somatic condition (BMI) from June to August in males supports their reduced foraging activity.
The male-biased sex ratio in crawling individuals was not observed in September and October, but mounting pairs were observed. Although the mechanism of this phenomenon is unclear, active mate searching by males might be concentrated in July and August. The crawling behavior may have a risk of predation. For example, mature males of burrowing amphipods expose themselves to search for females and are susceptible to piscine predation33,34. Dogwhelk foraging behavior is also influenced by predation risk at intertidal flats35. Although predation on exposed L. pulchella individuals has not been recorded, exposing themselves may have a risk of predation by crabs or birds. For instance, predation of L. pulchella by the swimming crab Charybdis (Charybdis) japonica has been observed in the laboratory17. Sex-biased predation risk can alter the growth and production of prey36. Thus, energy-consuming mating might become less frequent in September and October, which is the egg-laying season of L. pulchella. Another explanation for the relatively high density of exposed individuals in September and October is that both males and females must recover from reduced somatic conditions due to energetic investment in mating from July–August.
This study investigated the daytime crawling behavior of L. pulchella. The day or night variable was eliminated from the selected model for the sex of crawling individuals, indicating that the sex ratio of crawling individuals is consistent at any time of the day. However, it is empirically known that crawling individuals are abundant during low tide during the night in autumn and winter17; this is possibly related to the lower tidal level during the night than during the daytime. During the copulation period from July to August, the tidal level is relatively high throughout the night, indicating a higher occurrence of crawling individuals during the daytime than during the night. However, it is still unclear why they come to the sand surface during low tide and whether L. pulchella appears on the sand surface during the low tide of the neap tide. Future studies may elucidate the detailed biology of naticid crawling behavior such as seasonal variation in the frequency of hunting/mating or crawling frequency under food-limited conditions.
In conclusion, this study is the first to reveal the male-biased sex ratio in crawling naticids during the copulation season. Fishermen should take the following suggestions into consideration for their extermination efforts: (1) crawling L. pulchella individuals are abundant, especially in July and August, but they are male-biased; (2) the size distribution of collected L. pulchella individuals may be small in July and August, but this may be attributed to the greater proportion of males with smaller size than females; and (3) to reduce the number of females that lay egg collars, constant extermination efforts from May to October, especially during May–June and September–October, should be implemented.
Methods
Study site
Field surveys and the collection of L. pulchella individuals were conducted in Matsukawaura Lagoon, Fukushima, Japan (37°49′N, 140°59′E) between August 2015 and July 2019. This lagoon has an area of 6 km2. The maximum tidal range is approximately 1.5 m. Tidal flats appear during spring low tide, especially during the daytime, from March to September and during the night from October to February. We chose a sandy tidal flat of 30,000 m2 in area as the study site (Site F in a previous study37). The asari clam R. philippinarum, a target species of the clam fishery38,39 and the preferred prey of L. pulchella19,40, densely inhabits this site (average density of 480 individuals m−2 in 201537).
Field survey
Field surveys on crawling L. pulchella were conducted once or twice per month during the daytime low tide (0800–1500 h) between March and October from 2015 to 2019. Crawling individuals on the tidal flat were collected by hand and brought to the laboratory within 1 h. The density of crawling individuals was recorded by counting the individuals in an area of 18 m × 3 m, following Yoshida et al.37. This procedure was repeated multiple times. We included the individuals that were collected from the trails to calculate the density of crawling individuals. The number of pairs that exhibited shell mounting, which is assumed to be copulating behavior, was also recorded. We also carried out collections of crawling L. pulchella individuals for 30 min during low tide without recording the surveyed area. By comparing catch per unit effort (CPUE; the number of individuals per 30 min per person) and the density data for 18 m × 3 m areas on the same day (n = 5), we concluded that a 30-min collection effort was equivalent to the survey area of 1045.8 m2. Using this value, the CPUE data were converted into density data. The surveyed area was 432–4487 m2. We assumed that our collection of L. pulchella hardly affected the subsequent survey data; the population size of adult L. pulchella inhabiting the study site was estimated to be 10,200–37,800 individuals, based on the average egg collar density (0.17, 0.63, and 0.30 egg collars m−2 in 2015, 2016, and 2018, respectively) and single egg-collar production per female per year26.
Additional nocturnal collections of L. pulchella individuals were conducted during low tide (2000–2330 h) in March 2018, October 2018, March 2019, and May 2019. Data from these nocturnal surveys were not included in the analysis for density, but for sex ratio (see Measurement and analysis). Collected individuals were brought to the laboratory within 1 h.
Measurement and analysis
The shell height (SH) of all collected L. pulchella was measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using a sliding caliper. The shell was crushed using a hammer, and the soft body of each individual was extracted from the shell using forceps. Soft body wet weight (SBWW, g) was determined to the nearest 0.01 g. The operculum was not included in the soft body. The sex of each individual was identified by gonad inspection (Fig. 1d) or the presence or absence of a penis (Fig. 1e,f).
The densities of crawling L. pulchella individuals and mounting pairs were expressed as the number of individuals or pairs per 100 m2. To test whether crawling females were larger than crawling males, the SH data of males and females of different months and years were pooled and compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
To test if the sex ratio of crawling L. pulchella deviated from 1:1, a binomial test (two-sided) was performed for each month of each year. Individuals assumed to be mature (≥ 25 mm SH17) were included in the test. Additionally, to test whether the sex ratio of crawling individuals varied between months, day/night, or both, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a binomial family and logit-link function was constructed. The response variable was the sex of each individual (female = 0, male = 1), potential explanatory variables were month and day/night, and year was incorporated as a random variable. The model was selected based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC).
To assess the somatic condition of L. pulchella individuals, body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: \(\mathrm{BMI}={\text{SBWW}}\times {\mathrm{SH}}^{-2.5}\times {10}^{4}\). The power of 2.5 for SH was derived using a generalized linear model with a Gaussian family and log-link function for SBWW; log (SH), sex, month, and the interaction between sex and month were used as initial explanatory variables. The coefficient of log (SH) was found to be 2.506 in the model selected based on the AIC. To evaluate the effect of sex and month on somatic condition, another GLMM with a Gaussian family and identity-link function was constructed, using BMI as a response variable. The initial explanatory variables were SH, sex, month, and the interaction between sex and month; year was incorporated as a random variable. The model was selected based on AIC.
All statistical analyses were performed using the software R version 4.1.0 (www.r-project.org). Models were constructed using the package “lme4”. The field survey and laboratory procedures were conducted following the guidelines of the Hiroshima University Animal Research Committee (registration number 017A191002) and fishery adjustment regulation of Fukushima Prefecture.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Allendorf, F. W. & Lundquist, L. L. Introduction: Population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 17, 24–30 (2003).
Kopf, R. K. et al. Confronting the risks of large-scale invasive species control. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0172 (2017).
Luque, G. M. et al. The 100th of the world’s worst invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions 16, 981–985 (2014).
Genovesi, P. Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: A review. Biol. Invasions 7, 127–133 (2005).
Simberloff, D. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species?. Conserv. Biol. 17, 83–92 (2003).
Takeshita, F. & Maekawa, T. Paratectonatica tigrina (Gastropoda: Naticidae) adjusts its predation tactics depending on the chosen prey and their shell weight relative to its own. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 100, 921–926 (2020).
Wiltse, W. I. Effects of Polinices duplicatus (Gastropoda: Naticidae) on infaunal community structure at Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts, USA. Mar. Biol. 56, 301–310 (1980).
Commito, J. A. Effects of Lunatia heros predation on the population dynamics of Mya arenaria and Macoma balthica in Maine, USA. Mar. Biol. 69, 187–193 (1982).
Ansell, A. D. Experimental studies of a benthic predator–prey relationship. I. Feeding, growth, and egg-collar production in long-term cultures of the gastropod drill Polinices alderi (Forbes) feeding on the bivalve Tellina tenuis (da Costa). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 56, 235–255 (1982).
Savazzi, E. & Reyment, R. A. Subaerial hunting behaviour in Natica gualteriana (naticid gastropod). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 74, 355–364 (1989).
Gonor, J. J. Predator–prey reactions between two marine prosobranch gastropods. The Veliger 7, 228–232 (1969).
Hughes, R. N. Predatory behaviour of Natica unifasciata feeding intertidally on gastropods. J. Molluscan Stud. 51, 331–335 (1985).
Pahari, A. et al. Subaerial naticid gastropod drilling predation by Natica tigrina on the intertidal molluscan community of Chandipur, Eastern Coast of India. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 451, 110–123 (2016).
Sakai, K. Predation of the moon snail Neverita didyma, on the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum, at the culture ground in Mangoku-ura Inlet. Bull. Miyagi Prefect. Fish. Res. Dev. Cent. 16, 109–111 (2000) (in Japanese).
Tomiyama, T. et al. Unintentional introduction and the distribution of the nonindigenous moonsnail Euspira fortunei in Matsukawaura Lagoon, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 77, 1020–1026 (2011) (in Japanese with English abstract).
Okoshi, K. Alien species introduced with imported clams: The clam-eating moon snail Euspira fortunei and other unintentionally introduced species. Japanese J. Benthol. 59, 74–82 (2004) (in Japanese with English abstract).
Okoshi, K. & Sato-Okoshi, W. Euspira fortunei: Biology and fisheries science of an invasive species (Kouseishakouseikaku Press, 2011).
Tomiyama, T. Lethal and non-lethal effects of an invasive naticid gastropod on the production of a native clam. Biol. Invasions 20, 2005–2014 (2018).
Sato, S., Chiba, T. & Hasegawa, H. Long-term fluctuations in mollusk populations before and after the appearance of the alien predator Euspira fortunei on the Tona coast, Miyagi Prefecture, northern Japan. Fish. Sci. 78, 589–595 (2012).
Kinoshita, K., Sasaki, N., Seki, A., Matsumasa, M. & Takehara, A. Distribution of the invasive snail Laguncula pulchella and the effect of its predation on the mollusk populations in the Orikasa River Estuary after the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Japanese J. Benthol. 72, 61–70 (2018) (in Japanese with English abstract).
Sato, T., Iwasaki, T., Narita, K. & Matsumoto, I. Occurrence of the moonsnail Euspira fortunei after the earthquake in Matsukawaura Lagoon Japan. Bull. Fukushima Prefect. Fish. Exp. Stn. 79–82 (2016). (in Japanese).
Chiba, T. & Sato, S. Size-selective predation and drillhole-site selectivity in Euspira fortunei (Gastropoda: Naticidae): Implications for ecological and palaeoecological studies. J. Molluscan Stud. 78, 205–212 (2012).
Tanabe, T. Relationship between the shell height of the predatory moon snail Euspira fortunei and drilled hole diameter on the prey shell of manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 78, 37–42 (2012) (in Japanese with English abstract).
Hasegawa, H. & Sato, S. Predatory behaviour of the naticid Euspira fortunei: Why does it drill the left shell valve of Ruditapes philippinarum?. J. Molluscan Stud. 75, 147–151 (2009).
Kingsley-Smith, P. R., Richardson, C. A. & Seed, R. Size-related and seasonal patterns of egg collar production in Polinices pulchellus (Gastropoda: Naticidae) Risso 1826. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 295, 191–206 (2003).
Tomiyama, T. Timing and frequency of egg-collar production of the moonsnail Euspira fortunei. Fish. Sci. 79, 905–910 (2013).
Sakai, K. & Suto, A. Early development and behavior of the moon snail Neverita didyma. Miyagi Prefect. Rep. Fish. Sci. 5, 55–58 (2005) (in Japanese).
Cook, N. & Bendell-Young, L. Determining the ecological role of Euspira lewisii: Part I: Feeding ecology. J. Shellfish Res. 29, 223–232 (2010).
Peitso, E., Hui, E., Hartwick, B. & Bourne, N. Predation by the naticid gastropod Polinices lewisii (Gould) on littleneck clams Protothaca staminea (Conrad) in British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 72, 319–325 (1994).
Johannesson, K., Saltin, S. H., Duranovic, I., Havenhand, J. N. & Jonsson, P. R. Indiscriminate males: Mating behaviour of a marine snail compromised by a sexual conflict?. PLoS ONE 5, e12005 (2010).
Vaughn, D., Turnross, O. R. & Carrington, E. Sex-specific temperature dependence of foraging and growth of intertidal snails. Mar. Biol. 161, 75–87 (2014).
Watson, P. J., Arnqvist, G. & Stallmann, R. R. Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151, 46–58 (1998).
Schlacher, T. A. & Wooldridge, T. H. Patterns of selective predation by juvenile, benthivorous fish on estuarine macrofauna. Mar. Biol. 125, 241–247 (1996).
Sudo, H. & Azeta, M. Selective predation on mature male Byblis japonicus (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) by the barface cardinalfish, Apogon semilineatus. Mar. Biol. 114, 211–217 (1992).
Vadas, R. L., Burrows, M. T. & Hughes, R. N. Foraging strategies of dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.): Interacting effects of age, diet and chemical cues to the threat of predation. Oecologia 100, 439–450 (1994).
Donelan, S. C. & Trussell, G. C. Sex-specific differences in the response of prey to predation risk. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1235–1243 (2020).
Yoshida, K., Sato, T., Narita, K. & Tomiyama, T. Abundance and body size of the moonsnail Laguncula pulchella in the Misuji River estuary, Seto Inland Sea, Japan: Comparison with a population in northern Japan. Plankt. Benthos Res. 12, 53–60 (2017).
Sato, T., Ogata, Y., Nemoto, Y. & Shimamura, S. Status review and current concerns of the fishery for the short-neck clam, Ruditapes philippinarum, in Matsukawaura Lagoon, Fukushima Prefecture. Bull. Fukushima Prefect. Fish. Exp. Stn. 14, 57–67 (2007) (in Japanese).
Tomiyama, T. & Sato, T. Effects of translocation on the asari clam Ruditapes philippinarum at small spatial scales in Matsukawaura, Japan. Bull. Mar. Sci. 97, 647–664 (2021).
Chiba, T. & Sato, S. Invasion of Laguncula pulchella (Gastropoda: Naticidae) and predator–prey interactions with bivalves on the Tona coast, Miyagi prefecture, northern Japan. Biol. Invasions 15, 587–598 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the Fukushima Prefectural Research Institute of Fisheries Resources (formerly Soma Branch, Fukushima Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station) and fishermen of the Soma-Futaba Fisheries Association for their support during the field survey. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to the draft. This study was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K06207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.Y. and T.T. contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by all authors. Analyses were performed by K.Y. and T.T.. The first draft of the manuscript was written by K.Y. and T.T. and all authors commented on previous version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshida, K., Setogawa, T., Sato, T. et al. Male-biased sex ratio in the crawling individuals of an invasive naticid snail during summer: implications for population management. Sci Rep 12, 7911 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12144-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12144-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.