Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sourcing Herod the Great's calcite-alabaster bathtubs by a multi-analytic approach

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 14 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Herod “the Great”, king of Judea in the second half of the first century BC, was known for his building projects, wealth, and political power. Two of his personal calcite-alabaster bathtubs, found in the Kypros fortress and the palace of Herodium, are among the very limited archaeological evidence of his private life. It seemed plausible that they were imported from Egypt, the main source of calcite-alabaster in ancient periods. Yet, the recent identification of a calcite quarry in the Te’omim cave, Israel, challenges this hypothesis. Here, we developed an approach for identification of the source of calcite-alabaster, by combination of four analytical methods: ICP, FTIR, ssNMR and isotope ratio. These methods were then applied to Herod’s bathtubs demonstrating that they were indeed quarried in Israel rather than in Egypt.

Introduction

Herod, known as “Herod the Great,” was born ca. 73 BCE, during the reign of the Hasmonean queen, Alexandra (Salome). He was appointed king of Judea at Marcus Antonius's behest and by the Roman Senate in 40 BCE1, but managed to establish his reign over Judea only three years later2. His authority was approved by Octavian (later Augustus) in 31 BCE. As a Roman client king, Herod was dutiful to the Roman Caesar Augustus, and eager to present himself as a champion of the traditional values of Hellenistic and Roman monarchy, whose influence can clearly be detected in many of his building projects1. Furthermore, he adopted Roman cultural norms, such as his introduction of Roman bathing culture into his realm3. The western fascination with Herod the Great derives both from his notoriety in Christian tradition for ‘the Massacre of Innocents’ as a deliberate attempt to kill the infant Jesus (Matthew 2: 16)4, and from his remarkable success in establishing a quite long monarchy, navigating the different powers and interests affecting his realm. Herod’s “greatness,” reflected in his building projects, his wealth and political power, was known worldwide. He was a prodigious builder, constructing fortresses, palaces and entire cities in Judea, such as Masada, Jericho, Kypros, Paneas (Caesarea-Philippi), Caesarea (Maritima), Jerusalem and Herodium, but also endowing architectural and cultural projects outside his realm. Few individuals were so influential in changing the material culture of their time as he was; in fact, he introduced new trends in almost every aspect of life in Judea as documented by archaeology5. The exciting recent discovery of Herod's tomb at Herodium, southeast of Jerusalem, aroused new interest in his life and death. While much is known about Herod’s public activities, little archaeological evidence of his personal life and belongings is available.

Two exceptions to this are Herod’s personal calcite-alabaster bathtubs, one found over 4 decades ago in the fortress at Kypros (Fig. 1a)6 and one recently discovered in Herod’s private suite in the palace at Herodium. Both bathtubs were revealed in Herodian contexts which were clearly dated to Herod’s time7,8,9,10. Where were these bathtubs quarried? Since the Middle Bronze Age, Egypt played a crucial role in the arrival of calcite-alabaster artifacts in Israel, and the development of the local calcite- and gypsum- alabaster industry11,12,13,14. Therefore, it seemed safe to assume that these bathtubs were imported from Egypt, though transport of these stone tubs would be a challenging endeavor, considering their weight, estimated at 1.5 metric tons each6. Their origin has been now revisited with the recent identification of a calcite-alabaster quarry in the Te’omim cave, located on the western slopes of the Jerusalem hills (near modern-day Beth Shemesh, Israel), which was within the boundaries of Herod’s kingdom (Fig. 1b,c)15. In this cave, signs of quarrying-scars and cessation of quarrying are visible on the quarry’s walls and floor. Evidence includes ‘negatives’ left after the removal of calcite-alabaster blocks, blocks of calcite-alabaster that were left in place, due to fissures or defects in the bedrock, and cleaving channels—shallow channels left in the calcite-alabaster after a block was separated. U-Th dating results, as well as associated archaeological finds, indicate that major quarrying activities took place in the Te’omim Cave prior to 1500 BCE, during the Middle Bronze Age. Later use of the quarry is indicated by an abundance of Late Roman remains that were found on the quarried surfaces in the Cave15,16. These results are noteworthy, as it was previously assumed that all calcite-alabaster found in the Levant originated from Egypt, while poorer quality vessels made of gypsum were local products11. Based on these data, it is possible that Herod’s bathtubs were carved and made locally, in Judea, rather than in Egypt. In this study we address this exciting new possibility, and show through chemical analysis that they were indeed local in origin.

Figure 1
figure 1

Calcite-alabaster in Israel. (a) Herod’s calcite-alabaster bathtub found in Kypros fortress. Modified after ref. 15. (b) Location map. The quarry and royal bathtubs studied here are at Te’omim cave, kypros and Herodium. Q indicates calcite-alabaster quarries in Egypt. Modified after ref. 15. (c) Te’omim cave. The quarry is located in the right part of the photograph. Photographed by Ayala Amir, Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University.

The present research joins previous archaeometric and geologic studies of calcite-alabaster originated in the Mediterranean Basin, previously reviewed by Koralay et al.17 and Scardozzi et al.18. The former studies involved minero-petrographic and trace-element analyses, as well as δ13C, δ18O, δ87Sr isotopic measurements for provenance determination. Solid-state 13C-NMR was also argued to be successful for this analysis, by comparison of the intensities and line-widths of 13C-NMR profiles19.

Since Egypt was the main source of calcite-alabaster artifacts in Israel (see above), the focus of the present study, we compare Israeli samples mainly to those of Egyptian source, rather than to other Mediterranean sources for which there is no documentation of trade in calcite-alabaster with Israel.

Petrographic analysis of regional20 and Te’omim Cave21 speleothems (calcareous chemical cave deposits) shows wide variability in texture, depending on depositional environment within the cave and general climatic controls. Our visual inspection of the Herodian bathtub shows similar textural variations, from massive flowstone deposits to laminar stalagmitic calcite. While these variations seem to be similar in the bathtub and the regional speleothems, they do not allow accurate provenance determination. Solid-state 13C-NMR measurements of samples of the current research did not show significant differences between the Israeli and the Egyptian samples. Consequently, this method could not be used to identify the bathtubs source.

Therefore, in the present study we developed a new approach for the discrimination between different calcite-alabaster sources in order to identify the provenance of Herod’s royal bathtubs. Furthermore, it could be applied to the study of other archaeological calcite-alabaster artifacts. This approach provides information concerning both the composition and crystalline structure of calcite-alabaster and is based on four analytic methods, most of which have not been previously used for provenance determination. The combination of these methods provides much higher confidence in the interpretation of the provided data.

Results

Development of methodology

In order to identify the origin of Herod’s bathtubs, we applied a variety of analytical tools that enabled differentiation between calcite-alabaster of Egyptian versus southern Levantine origin. These methods were then applied to determine the origin of Herod’s calcite-alabaster bathtubs. The methods used in this research include: inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, routine infra-red (IR) spectroscopy, 1H- and 31P- solid state NMR (ssNMR) experiments and C and O stable isotope ratio analysis (see “Materials and methods”).

Analytical data were first collected from samples of two well-defined sources, from Egypt and modern-day Israel. The Egyptian sources included both ancient and modern calcite-alabaster samples. The ancient samples were courtesy of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. These ancient vessel remains were collected by the Austrian archaeological expedition to Giza in the nineteenth century. The modern Egyptian artifact (made of geological-sourced calcite-alabaster) was bought in a market in Cairo, Egypt in 2013. The calcite-alabaster from Israel included raw material from the Te’omim cave quarry, chips (mining debitage) found in the cave near the quarry, and chips and a stone block (raw material carved to a cube, but not yet used to make a vessel) from Umm el-‘Umdan—an archaeological site near the Te’omim cave. Additional samples were collected from a speleothem in Natuf cave (located in Wadi en-Natuf in the western Samaria area) (see Supplementary Table S1 online).

Analysis

The calcite-alabaster samples from sources in Israel and Egypt were analyzed to determine their composition and their crystalline structure. ICP-AES analysis showed that the distribution of concentrations of the trace elements magnesium, strontium, phosphorus and titanium differed between these samples. Egyptian samples contained significantly higher concentrations of magnesium and strontium compared to the samples from Israel, while their phosphorus and titanium concentrations were lower (Table 1). PCA (principal components analysis) of these data presents clear clustering of the Israeli and Egyptian samples (Fig. 2). The magnesium and strontium concentrations of the Egyptian samples fall within the range of concentrations reported for samples from various quarries in Egypt22,23,24.

Table 1 ICP-AES results (in ppm).
Figure 2
figure 2

PCA (principal components analysis) presentation of the ICP results. Clustering of the element distribution of the Israeli (red) and Egyptian (blue) samples. The bathtubs data points are in green.

Routine FTIR analysis25 results obtained from repeated grinding between measurements, enabled detection of slight differences in the structure of calcite from various sources (Egypt and Israel). These routine IR tests revealed small changes in the calcite peaks, manifested by different "grinding curves," in terms of location and slope in the graph. The graphs show a clear division between the "Israeli" and "Egyptian" curves; the former are displaced, for the most part, to the right of the latter (with higher v4 values relative to their v2 values), and are characterized by slopes which are more moderate than the Egyptian ones (0.14 ± 1.91 for the former vs. 0.25 ± 2.22 for the latter, Fig. 3). These results indicate a higher degree of atomic order of the calcite-alabaster from Israel in comparison to the Egyptian material.

Figure 3
figure 3

Routine FT-IR grinding curve results of the two bathtubs (triangles) over the background of the Israeli (diamond) and Egyptian (circle) curves.

Solid-state phosphorus (31P) and proton (1H) NMR analyses were next performed to provide quantitative and structural information regarding the calcite-alabaster. The direct polarization (DP) phosphorus NMR measurements showed clear phosphate peaks in all the samples from Israel, while these peaks were absent from the Egyptian calcite-alabaster (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. S1 online). Thus, the Israeli samples contain phosphorus, whereas in the Egyptian samples, phosphorus content, if present, is below detection level. In addition, the results of the proton NMR measurements show that calcite-alabaster samples from Israeli origin contain relatively more water, both in the bulk of the material (indicated by the broad component of the water peak), as well as on its surface (the narrow component of the water peak) (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. S1 online). This is manifested quantitatively by the ratio of the left peak(s) intensity to that of the right peak (calculated on deconvoluted spectra). Thus, in the samples from Israel this ratio is 7.31 ± 2.25, whereas in the Egyptian samples it is 0.32 ± 0.22. This information is consistent with the results of the ICP and IR analyses.

Figure 4
figure 4

Solid state NMR results: I-8 representative sample from Te’omim cave, Israel; E-2 representative sample from Egypt; H from Herodium bathtub; K from Kypros bathtub. (a) 31P NMR data. (b) 1H NMR data.

Finally, we measured carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotopic ratios of various samples. This analysis also showed a distinction between the samples from Egypt and Israel (Table 2 and Fig. 5). Furthermore, the Israeli data is distinct from parallel data of calcite-alabaster quarries around the Mediterranean Basin17,18,23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32 (Fig. 5).

Table 2 Carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) stable isotopic ratios.
Figure 5
figure 5

The δ13C and δ18O stable isotopes diagram. Distribution of the Israeli (red) and Egyptian (blue) samples of the present study, and literature data from the Mediterranean Basin (gray). Herod’s bathtubs data are in green. The numbers in parentheses refer to the reference from which the data was taken.

Comparison of data previously collected in Israel33,34,35,36 and Egypt23,26 demonstrates that the corresponding O isotopic ratios partially overlap, whereas the C isotopic ratios of the Egyptian samples fall in a distinct sub-range within the Israeli data. Indeed, the data collected in our experiments correspond well with these published results. Moreover, our results from the Israeli samples fall within the wide literature range for Israeli samples, and are completely distinct from the Egyptian range. We note that our results for both C and O ratios (Table 2) correspond perfectly to the section of the glacial period, stage 6 (ca 130,000–170,000 years ago), measured along a stalagmite spanning the last 170,000 years in a cave in the Judean hills near Jerusalem34.

Thus, all four analytical methods applied in this study gave consistent results, clearly distinguishing the Israeli from the Egyptian calcite-alabaster.

Herod’s bathtubs

The four analytical methods (ICP, routine IR, ss NMR, and isotope ratio) were then applied to samples from Herod’s bathtubs. The vast majority of the analytic data from both bathtubs, obtained through these four analytical methods, clearly fall within the range of the Israeli samples and out of the range of the Egyptian ones (Table 3 and Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5).

Table 3 Summary of results.

Overall, the results unequivocally indicate that the bathtubs were quarried in Israel and not in Egypt.

Two of the data points, measured for the bathtub from Herodium, require clarification. The phosphorus content of the sample from this bathtub is low, within the value range of the Egyptian samples, though it also overlaps the lower level of the Israeli samples (the concentration ranges of phosphorus overlap in the Israeli and Egyptian samples, Table 1). In addition, the grinding curve slope of the Herodium bathtub is exceptional. Its high value is more similar to the Egyptian values, in contrast to those from the Israeli known samples, and in contrast to most of the other results that show a similarity to samples from Israel. The grinding curve slope is dominated by relative changes in IR absorption due to different particle sizes—the product of a manual process. However, the location (offset) of a grinding curve is determined by the degree of local crystalline order, an absolute value37. Therefore, the offset is a more reliable indicator in determining provenance/character of the calcite. Note that the grinding curve of the Herodium bathtub was determined by seven IR peak intensities that are quite close to each other, whereas the eighth point on the graph is much farther away, presenting much higher v4 and v2 values (this exceptional result, which increases the slope of the graph, may be due to poor manual grinding of the sample). Thus, small variations in the value of this point have a very significant effect on the slope. Indeed, omission of this point would reduce the slope of the graph to 1.97, a value that is unequivocally within the range of the slopes of the samples from Israel.

Conclusions

In this study, we developed an approach for the identification of the source of calcite-alabaster, by the combination of four analytic methods that include ten criteria. It is important to note that each method provided a clear distinction between Egyptian and Israeli material, though the provenance determination of the calcite-alabaster is strengthened by the combination of results from all these methods together.

The present study identified the origin of two magnificent royal bathtubs of Herod: they were carved from material mined in Israel. These results attest to the fact that the calcite-alabaster industry in Judea in the second half of the first century BC was sufficiently developed and of high enough quality to serve the luxurious standards of Herod—one of the finest builders among the kings of that period.

Materials and methods

Materials

The ancient Egyptian samples, collected by the Austrian archaeological expedition to Giza in the nineteenth century, were courtesy of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. A modern Egyptian artifact (made of geological-sourced calcite-alabaster) was bought in a market in Cairo, Egypt in 2013.

The calcite-alabaster from Israel included raw material from the Te’omim cave quarry, chips (mining debitage) found in the cave near the quarry, and chips and a stone block (raw material) from Umm el- ‘Umdan. Additional samples were collected from a speleothem in Natuf cave. The samples from the quarry were sawn from the wall by a Makita grinder saw. All samples were crushed to powder by an agate mortar and pestle (for details of all samples and analyses, see Supplementary Table S1 online).

Methods

The methods used in this research include: inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis, routine infra-red (IR) spectroscopy, 1H- and 31P- solid state NMR (ssNMR) experiments and C and O stable isotope ratio analysis.

ICP analysis

Instrumentation

The amount of the following elements: copper (Cu), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), strontium (Sr), zinc (Zn), phosphorus (P), titanium (Ti), sulfur (S), manganese (Mn) and aluminum (Al), in each of the tested samples was characterized by elemental analysis using an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) spectrometer (Ultima 2, Jobin Yvon Horiba). Classic calibration method with standard solutions was used.

Sample preparation

The solid samples (1gr) were dissolved in a strong acid-HNO3 (2 mL) at room temperature upon stirring until no stone particles could be seen in the solution. The samples were kept in a chemical hood for a week (in order to ensure complete dissolution) and then were diluted tenfold with DDW (double deionized water, 18 mL). The resulting solutions were analyzed by ICP.

Calibration method

ICP multi-element solution of 23 elements (Merck IV) and single elemental ICP standards with a concentration of 1000 mg/L (Cu, Fe, Mg, Sr, Zn, P, Ti, S, Mn and Al), obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), were used to prepare the working standard calibration solutions.

FTIR analysis

Samples were prepared from hand-ground (agate mortar and pestle, 10 s to 3 min) calcite that was diluted (~ 1:20 mass ratio) with KBr (Sigma-Aldrich, FTIR grade), then uniaxially pressed (2 tons, sufficient to allow the KBr to flow and recrystallize as an IR transparent matrix) to yield a disk that is suitable for IR measurements in a transmission geometry (Nicolet 380, 4 cm−1 resolution). Samples of well-defined origin and vessels were prepared as written above, and passed the grinding and measuring process 6–10 times. These measurements yielded varying v4 and v2 values, normalized by v3. These values were set in a graph of v2 vs. v4, to receive a set of curves with different slopes- “grinding curves”.

NMR analysis

1H, and 31P MAS NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker 11.7 and 4.7 T Avance III, 500 MHz, narrow-bore spectrometer, equipped with a 3.2 and 4 mm (respectively) VTN CPMAS double-resonance probe at a spinning rate of 8 kHz. 31P direct polarization spectra were collected with 146–11,244 scans and recycle delays of 8 s. 1H direct polarization spectra were collected with 160 scans and recycle delays of 5 s. Deconvolutions of 1H lines were carried out using the DMFIT program developed by Massiot et al.38.

Isotope analysis

δ18Oc and δ13C analyses were made on 0.35–0.5 mg samples, obtained by drilling at intervals of ~ 0.5–1.0 mm and put in glass vials. Dry phosphoric acid (100%) was added to the vials, which are placed in a horizontal position to avoid reaction with the carbonate. The samples were flushed with pure helium gas for 10 min in order to remove all atmospheric CO2, and only then the vials were turned to vertical position to allow the phosphoric acid to react with the powder of the drilled samples, forming CO2. The CO2 was measured using a Delta Plus mass spectrometer with a Gas Bench automatic sampler in order to measure δ18Oc and δ13C. All δ18Oc and δ13C values were calibrated against the international standard NBS-19, and were reported in permil (‰), relative to the VPDB standard.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Change history

References

  1. Jacobson, D. M. Three Roman client kings: Herod of Judaea, Archelaus of Cappadocia and Juba of Mauretania. Palest. Explor. Q. 133, 22–38 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Netzer, E. The Architecture of Herod, the great builder (Baker Academic, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshak, A. K. The Many Faces of Herod the Great (Eerdmans Publishing, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McSherry, J. Worms, diabetes and King Herod the Great. J. Med. Biogr. 5, 167–169 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrell, B. The legacies of Herod the great. Near Eastern Archaeology 77, 68–74 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Netzer, E. Cypros. Qadmoniot 2/3 (30/31), 54–61 (1975).

  7. Netzer, E. & Cypros, D. E. In Hasmonean and Herodian Palaces at Jericho, Final Reports of the 1973–1987 Excavations, Vol. II, Stratigraphyand Architecture (eds Netzer, E. & Laureys-Chachy, R.) 233–280 (Israel Exploration Society, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bar-Nathan, R. & Gaertner, J. The stone artifacts from the Hasmonean and Herodian Palaces at Jericho and Cypros. In Hasmonean and Herodian Palaces at Jericho, Final Reports of the 1973–1987 Excavations, Vol. V, The Finds from Jericho and Cypros (ed. Netzer, E.) 133–202 (Israel Exploration Society, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Porat, R., Kalman, Y. & Chachy, R. Excavations on Mount Herodium and its slopes, 2006–2017. In The Palaces of the Hasmoneans and Herod the Great Reprinted and Expanded Edition (ed. Netzer, E.) 138–162 (Israel Exploration Society, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ben Haim, A. The Architectural Decoration of the Mountain Fortress-Palace at Herodium: A Study of Cultural Influence and Carving Techniques in King Herod’s Palace. (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2020).

  11. Ben-Dor, I. Palestinian alabaster vases. QDAP 11, 93–112 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sparks, R. T. Egyptian stone vessels in Syro-Palestine during the second millennium B.C. and their impact on the local stone vessel industry. In Cultural Interaction in the Ancient Near East: Papers Read at a Symposium Held at the University of Melbourne, Department of Classics and Archaeology (29–30 September 1994) (ed. Bunnens, G.) 51–66 (Abr-Nahrain, Supplement Series Vol. 5. Louvain: Peeters, 1996).

  13. Sparks, R. T. Stone Vessels in the Levant (The Palestine Exploration Fund Annual 8, 2007).

  14. Bevan, A. Stone Vessels and Values in the Bronze Age Mediterranean (Cambridge University Press, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499678.

  15. Frumkin, A. et al. In-situ dating of ancient quarries and the source of flowstone (‘calcite-alabaster’) artifacts in the southern Levant. J. Archaeol. Sci. 41, 749–758 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frumkin, A., Bar-Matthews, M., Davidovich, U., Amir, A. & Zissu, B. A New Source of Calcite Alabaster in the Southern Levant. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the XII ASMOSIA Conference (Izmir, 2018). In press.

  17. Koralay, T. et al. Multi-isotope investigations for scientific characterisation and provenance implication of banded travertines from Tripolis Antique City (Denizli–Turkey). Environ. Archaeol. 24, 317–336 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scardozzi, G., Brilli, M. & Giustini, F. Calcite alabaster artifacts from Hierapolis in Phrygia, Turkey: Provenance determination using carbon and oxygen stable isotopes. Geoarchaeology 34, 169–186 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gutiérrez Garcia, M. A. et al. NMR as a new tool for cultural heritage application: The provenance of ancient white marbles. Archaeometry 61, 795–808 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bar-Matthews, M., Matthews, A. & Ayalon, A. Environmental controls of speleothem mineralogy in a karstic dolomitic terrain (soreq cave, israel). J. Geol. 99, 189–207 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amid, Y. Characterization and Paleoclimate Trends in the Middle Pleistocene Transition (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2016).

  22. Klemm, R. & Klemm, D. D. Steine und Steinbrüche im Alten Ägypten. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77027-2.

  23. Rifai, R. I. Reconstruction of the Middle Pleistocene climate of south Mediterranean using the Wadi Sannur speleothem, eastern Desert, Egypt. Carbonates Evaporites 22, 73–85 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Railsback, L. B., Dabous, A. A., Osmond, J. K. & Fleisher, C. J. Petrographic and geochemical screening of speleothems for U-series dating: An example from recrystallized speleothems from Wadi Sannur Cavern, Egypt. J. Caves Karst Stud. 64, 108–116 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Regev, L., Poduska, K. M., Addadi, L., Weiner, S. & Boaretto, E. Distinguishing between calcites formed by different mechanisms using infrared spectrometry: Archaeological applications. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 3022–3029 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Çolak, M. & Lazzarini, L. Quarries and characterisation of a hitherto unknown alabaster and marble from Thyatira (Akhisar, Turkey). In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the VI ASMOSIA Conference (Venice, 2000) (ed. Lazzarini, L.) 35–40 (Bottega d’Erasmo Aldo Ausilio Editore, 2002).

  27. Antonelli, F., Lazzarini, L., Cancelliere, S. & Dessandier, D. On the white and coloured marbles of the Roman town of Cuicul (Djemila, Algeria)*. Archaeometry https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2009.00498.x (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrmann, J., Van den Hoek, A. & Tykot, R. H. Alabastro a pecorella, Aïn Tekbalet, and Bou Hanifia, Algeria: A preliminary report. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the IX ASMOSIA Conference (Tarragona 2009) (eds. Gutiérrez Garcia-Moreno, A., et al.) 463–470 (Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica (ICAC), 2012).

  29. Brilli, M., Giustini, F., Barone, P. M., Fayek, A. & Scardozzi, G. Characterizing the Alabastro listato or fiorito of Hierapolis in Phrygia: A simple method to identify its provenance using carbon stable isotopes. Archaeometry 60, 403–418 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Özkul, M. et al. Comparison of the Quaternary travertine sites in the Denizli extensional basin based on their depositional and geochemical data. Sediment. Geol. 294, 179–204 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Uysal, I. et al. U-series dating and geochemical tracing of late Quaternary travertine in co-seismic fissures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 257, 450–462 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. De Filippis, L. et al. Growth of fissure ridge travertines from geothermal springs of Denizli Basin, western Turkey. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 124, 1629–1645 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frumkin, A. & Stein, M. The Sahara-East Mediterranean dust and climate connection revealed by strontium and uranium isotopes in a Jerusalem speleothem. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 217, 451–464 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Frumkin, A., Ford, D. C. & Schwarcz, H. P. Paleoclimate and vegetation of the Last Glacial Cycles in Jerusalem from a speleothem record. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 863–870 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A., Gilmour, M., Matthews, A. & Hawkesworth, C. J. Sea–land oxygen isotopic relationships from planktonic foraminifera and speleothems in the Eastern Mediterranean region and their implication for paleorainfall during interglacial intervals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 3181–3199 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A. & Kaufman, A. Late quaternary paleoclimate in the Eastern Mediterranean region from stable isotope analysis of speleothems at Soreq Cave, Israel. Quat. Res. 47, 155–168 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Poduska, K. M. et al. Decoupling local disorder and optical effects in infrared spectra: Differentiating between calcites with different origins. Adv. Mater. 23, 550–554 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Massiot, D. et al. Modelling one- and two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra. Magn. Reson. Chem. 40, 70–76 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The Israel Science Foundation, Grant No. 104\2013. We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel for a MA fellowship to Ayala Amir (Grant No. 3-10713). We thank Vanessa Novak from the Ägyptisch-Orientalische Sammlung, Kunsthistorisches museum in Vienna for the generous gift of Egyptian Alabaster vessels; Roi Porat, Yakov Kalman and Rachel Chachy, The Herodium Expedition, The institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem for providing the sample of calcite-alabaster from the Herodium bathtub; Dr. Ortal Haik, Dr. Keren Adamsky-keinan, Dr. Adi Eliyahu and Yael Amid for their help with the ICP, ssNMR, routine IR and isotope ratio experiments, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: A.F., A.M.M., B.Z.; Methodology: A.A., A.F., G.G.; Investigation: Ay.A.; Funding acquisition: Ay.A., A.F., B.Z.; Supervision: A.A., A.F., A.M.M., B.Z.; Writing—original draft: A.A., Ay.A.; Writing—review & editing: A.A., Ay.A., A.F., A.M.M., B.Z., G.G.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayala Amir.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 4 where the resolution of the Figure was low. In addition, Table 3 contained several errors for Israeli samples (Average) and Egyptian samples (Average). The standard deviation values for “IR, slope” and the range of negative values for “Isotope ratios” were inadvertently switched.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amir, A., Frumkin, A., Zissu, B. et al. Sourcing Herod the Great's calcite-alabaster bathtubs by a multi-analytic approach. Sci Rep 12, 7524 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11651-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11651-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing