Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 (pfhrp2/3) genes have been reported in several parts of the world. These deletions are known to compromise the effectiveness of HRP2-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (HRP2-RDT). The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) in Tanzania adopted HRP2-RDTs as a routine tool for malaria diagnosis in 2009 replacing microscopy in many Health facilities. We investigated pfhrp2/3 deletions in 122 samples from two areas with diverse malaria transmission intensities in Northeastern Tanzania. Pfhrp2 deletion was confirmed in 1.6% of samples while pfhrp3 deletion was confirmed in 50% of samples. We did not find parasites with both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions among our samples. Results from this study highlight the need for systematic surveillance of pfhrp2/3 deletions in Tanzania to understand their prevalence and determine their impact on the performance of mRDT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Malaria continues to be a health problem in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where the 10 countries with the highest infection rates and deaths in the world are found1. A recent resurgence of the disease is evident in areas where a significant decline in malaria cases was previously observed and this inevitably calls for scrutiny of the malaria control interventions currently in use1, which comprise a number of strategies1,2. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is the approved regimen for malaria treatment3. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends for parasitological confirmation to be carried out before this treatment is provided4. Microscopy, although still regarded as the gold standard in malaria diagnosis, faces several operational challenges5,6. In the resource-limited settings of SSA, shortage of personnel with expertise, and long turn-around time of results from the laboratory have been identified as obstacles to the effective microscopic diagnosis of malaria, particularly in rural settings7,8.
Rapid diagnostic tests have proven to be reliable and sensitive enough to replace microscopy as a routine technique for malaria diagnosis in symptomatic patients9. The National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) in Tanzania rolled out malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (mRDT) in 2009, achieving diagnostic coverage of around 90% in public and private health facilities in 2014, with microscopy being used in the remaining 10% of facilities in the country10. Over 80% of mRDTs manufactured worldwide are sold or distributed in SSA. Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA) approved five brands of mRDTs to be used in Tanzania11. Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets (ADDOs) sells an average of 40 RDT units every week, most of them are HRP2-based and there are more than 6000 outlets in Tanzania mainland12,13. Rapid diagnostic tests have different detection thresholds, but sensitivity and specificity decrease when parasitaemia is below 200 parasites/µl14,15. Given the high detection threshold, mRDT might miss malaria parasites that are at low densities.
The majority of mRDTs distributed in the SSA are for Plasmodium falciparum detection16, mostly utilizing the histidine-rich protein (HRP2), as the antigenic marker. HRP2 is a 60–105 kD water-soluble protein secreted by P. falciparum trophozoites (asexual stage), encoded by the sub-telomeric pfhrp2 locus on chromosome 817,18. HRP2 is abundantly secreted and easily detected in the peripheral blood circulation of the host even when the parasite has sequestered in the microvasculature of the organs19,20, making the protein an important diagnostic target.
Studies in the last decade have reported the presence of P. falciparum parasites lacking both the loci encoding HRP2 and its isoform HRP3 (encoded by pfhrp3), which has sufficient similarity to HRP2 and is recognised by the monoclonal antibodies used on the RDT test strips. P. falciparum parasites lacking the locus are thus not detected by HRP2-RDT. In the Amazon region of South America, these deletions have a reported prevalence of 28.6%, leading to recommendations to immediately stop using HRP2-RDTs21. Evidence from Asian countries also suggests the presence of P. falciparum lacking pfhrp2, including in India with a prevalence of 4%22 and China-Maynmar border with a prevalence of 5%23. Across Africa, Eritrea reported the highest prevalence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions of 80.8% and 92.3%, respectively, which prompted a switch to non-HRP2-RDTs24,25. Studies elsewhere in East Africa also showed evidence of low proportions of pfhrp2/3 gene deletions from field isolates26,27,28,29.
As Tanzania embarks on a malaria pre-elimination strategy, RDTs will play a crucial role in case detection, and assessment of their performance is vital. This study set out to assess the performance of HRP2-RDTs in two areas in Tanzania with different malaria transmission intensities.
Results
Malaria parasite detection
A total of 998 blood samples, 472 from Moshi and 526 from Handeni sites were collected and investigated for pfhrp2/3 deletions using LDH/HRP2-RDT, microscopy and nested PCR. In Moshi site, only 1 sample (0.2%) was positive by mRDT while in the Handeni site, 203 (38.6%) samples were positive. Analysis by nested PCR revealed that 135 (13.5%) samples were positive, of which 19 (4%) positive samples were from Moshi and 116 (22%) positives were from Handeni as shown in Table 1.
Confirming pfhrp2/3 deletion
A total of 122 samples that were positive for P. falciparum species-specific PCR or microscopy were analysed for pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions. Of the 122 samples, four samples were pfhrp2 PCR negative, and two of the four samples (1.6%) had relative parasitaemia of ≥ 5 p/µl and were considered true pfhrp2 deletion. The two samples with the confirmed pfhrp2 deletion had parasiteamia of 144 p/µl and 440 p/µl. Pfhrp3 analysis showed that 52% (63/122) of the samples were negative, and further analysis on parasitaemia revealed that the majority (50%, n = 61 ) had a relative parasite density of ≥ 5/µl (Fig. 1). The parasitaemia of the pfhrp3-deleted samples ranges between 12 p/µl and 14,696 p/µl, with a mean parasite density of 1473 p/µl. The pgmet, a single-copy parasite gene, was used both for confirmation of DNA quality and to estimate parasite density.
Effect of pfhrp2/3 gene deletion on RDT performance
Of the 122 samples screened for pfhrp2/3 deletion, four samples carried pfhrp2-deleted parasites and gave positive RDT signal; of which two samples reacted on HRP2 line only. On the other hand, only 2 out of 63 samples with pfhrp3 deletion were RDT negative (Table 2). Overall, there were 32 samples with RDT negative results but pfhrp2/3 positive had a mean parasitaemia of 14 p/µl, ranging between 1 p/µl and 142 p/µl.
Impact of parasitaemia on pfhrp2/3 gene detection
No statistically significant difference in parasitaemia was observed between the two pfhrp2/3 groups. Median parasitaemia was 104 p/µl in the pfhrp2 positive and 26 p/µl in the pfhrp2-deleted samples respectively (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, pfhrp3 positive and pfhrp3-deleted samples had a median parasitaemia of 504 p/µl and 18 p/µl, respectively (Fig. 2B).
Discussion
In this study, we report evidence of pfhrp2/3 deletions in north-eastern Tanzania. We confirmed the presence of two samples with pfhrp2 deletion, though they did not cause RDT negative result. This finding is also consistent with previous studies on samples from Tanzania and Yemen, where they found pfhrp2 deletion on an mRDT positive sample30,31. This anomaly might be due to false-positive results on mRDT caused by cross-reaction with circulating proteins such as rheumatoid factor32 or the positive RDT signal may have arisen from the previous infection with pfhrp2-positive samples33. Our results also show a high proportion of pfhrp3 deletion compared to pfhrp2. This finding is interesting, given pfhrp3 deletion is suggested to be more common in low transmission season with minimal chance of polyclonal infection. Reports from Central and Southern America, where malaria transmission is low, showed similar observations, whereby up to 70% of the tested samples had a deletion on pfhrp3 region21,34,35. Double deletions (pfhrp2 + pfhrp3) were not observed in this study.
Guidelines on pfhrp2/3 deletions rely solely on discordant results between microscopy and mRDT or a dual-antigen HRP2-RDT as an algorithm for suspecting the deletions36. All the microscopy positive samples were screened in this analysis, irrespective of symptoms, even if they had positive mRDT results. Studies have shown persistence of HRP2 in the plasma up to 28 days after treatment particularly in high parasitaemia infections33, in that case, a person can have a new infection with P. falciparum parasites lacking pfhrp2/3 genes but have a circulating HRP2 from the previous infection commonly observed in areas with high malaria transmission. These findings suggest the importance of timing of the surveillance and considerations should be given to find optimum time when to survey pfhrp2/3 deletions during the transmission season. In the absence of the pfhrp2 locus, circulating HRP3 protein alone can give a positive HRP-RDT signal when parasitaemia is more than 1000 parasite/µl37. High sequence and structural homology between the two isoform proteins is the accepted reason for this29,38,39. This phenomenon can mask the deletion effect on either of the genes on the performance of mRDT at moderate to high parasite density.
The presence of pfhrp2/3 deletions in asymptomatic individuals highlights the importance of surveying individuals with different disease spectrum and documenting the importance pfhrp2/3 deletion in disease outcome40. The WHO master protocol for surveillance of pfhrp2/pfhrp3 deletion, which emphasizes a health-center-based approach targeting symptomatic individuals, could miss deletions in asymptomatic individuals41. However, it is not clear what proportion of the deletions is contributed from asymptomatic individuals, and their inclusion may not be operationally feasible. The use of HRP2-based RDT will likely exert selective pressure on the parasite population and could lead to the spread of pfhrp2/3-deleted parasites42.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions in P. falciparum isolates from Tanzania. This makes it urgent for systematic surveillance of pfhrp2/3 deletions to understand the prevalence and extent of such deletions in Tanzania. The high proportion of pfhrp3 deletion attracts attention and there is now a need to understand what drives these deletions through the transmission season. Findings from this study support the idea of screening for pfhrp2/3 deletions even in mRDT positive samples, bearing in mind the cross-reactivity between the two proteins but also the false positivity of mRDTs due to persistence of plasma HRP2/HRP3 after treatment.
Study limitations
The study was conducted in the middle of peak transmission season (April–June 2018) and in an area previously reported to have high polyclonal P. falciparum infections43,44. We might have underestimated gene deletions since we did not estimate the multiplicity of infection in the study area. A positive signal from non-falciparum parasites may have also caused a reaction in the LDH line but we couldn’t verify this as we did not have DNA left. The use of a high throughput multiplex qPCR targeting single copy parasite gene can resolve the veiled effect of polyclonal infection in pfhrp2/3 gene deletion39.
Methods
Study area and participants
This study was conducted in Lower-Moshi in Kilimanjaro and Handeni Tanga region (Fig. 3). Handeni is in the Tanga region, on the North-Eastern coast of Tanzania. The region is endemic for malaria with a perennial transmission pattern and is known to be a focal area for malaria drug resistance. It has an EIR of about ~ 100 infectious bites per person per year and a perennial prevalence of 25–30%44,45,46. The study area has two rainy seasons per year, which denotes the peaks of malaria transmission. The long rainy season is from March-June and the short rainy season is from October–November. The area is located at 309 m above sea level, 5°22′60″ N and 38°34′60″ E.
The second study site was Lower Moshi (3021′ S, 37020′ E), The area is about 800 m above sea level, south of Mount Kilimanjaro. It is one of the sentinel sites for insecticide resistance surveillance under the National Malaria Control Programme. Transmission of malaria in Lower Moshi occurs throughout the year with a prevalence of < 0.1%47.
Sample size calculation
The sample size was calculated assuming the following parameters, proportion for pfhrp2/3 gene deletion PCR is 0.5 (proportion in the population), Power = 0.80, Alpha = 0.05 (two-sided), Anticipated difference = 0.1, Alternative p = 0.4, Design effect = 2. The estimated required sample size in each site was 194*2 = 388 per study site, (Using STATA software). The total estimated minimum sample size was 776 in the two study sites. In this study we enrolled 1013 participants but presented results for only 998 participants, enrolment forms for 15 individuals had missing information and were dropped from the analysis.
Participant recruitment
Community sensitization meetings were organized, whereby the study personnel explained the study and answered any questions in an open forum before participant recruitment. Enrolment occurred in health facilities in each site, participants were enrolled only after verification of potential eligibility, explaining the study in Swahili (local language) and consent to participate. Each member of the community had an equal chance of being selected as a participant.
Sample collection and Malaria rapid diagnosis
Whole blood was collected just after the rainy season, from April to June 2018. The diagnosis on enrolled participants was done on-site, whereby a qualitative SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/Pan test (Standard diagnostics INC. Korea) detects histidine-rich protein II (HRP-II) antigen of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) for the Plasmodium species.
Blood smear microscopy
Thick and thin smears were prepared and left to air dry at room temperature, thin smears were carefully sprayed with absolute methanol for fixation. Staining was done with 10% Giemsa stain for 30 min, thereafter the stain was washed away by tap water and left to dry. Double reading of the slides was done by a separate microscopist and discordant results were then resolved by a third reader and results were presented as the number of parasites in every 200 white blood cells. Microscopists received their training from the Malaria Diagnostic Centre of Excellence in Kisumu Kenya48.
DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was extracted from dried blood spots (DBS) using a robotic DNA extraction system (Qiasymphony, QIAGEN, Germany) at the London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)- UK, the method previously validated and published49,50.
PCR confirmation of Plasmodium falciparum DNA
Plasmodium falciparum was detected using a standard nested-PCR technique targeting 18S ribosomal RNA, primers and PCR conditions were as previously published51.
Estimation of parasite density
A qPCR that amplifies tRNA methionine of the Plasmodium (PgMET) gene and human beta-tubulin gene (HumTUBB) was used to relatively estimate parasite density in the samples. HumTUBB was used as an internal DNA extraction control and Plasmodium falciparum international standard as a calibrator29,52. Primers and probes used (Table 3), master mixes, and amplification profiles were adopted from Beshir et al. (2010)53.
Pfhrp2/Pfhrp3 genotyping
The amplification of pfhrp2/3 genes from DBS samples was done using nested-PCR as described previously21,54. Primers used for nest-1 PCR were Pfhrp2-F1 (5′-CAAAAGGACTTAATTTAAATAAGAG-3′) and Pfhrp2-R1 (5′-AATAAATTTAATGGCGTAGGCA-3′). Nest-2 primers used were Pfhrp2-F2 (5′-ATTATTACACGAAACTCAAGCAC-3′) and Pfhrp2-R1. PCR reaction mix contained a final concentration of 0.2 µM for each primer, 0.5 µM of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix (Promega), 0.2 U of Taq-polymerase (AmpliTaq Gold-Applied biosystems), and 5 µl of the DNA template. Amplification thermo-profile for the reaction was 95 °C for 10 min (Enzyme activation) followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 50 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 65 °C for 1 min. Final elongation was done at 70 °C for 15 min then at 4 °C until removed from the machine. Primers used for the amplification of Pfhrp3 gene were Pfhrp3-F1 (5′-AATGCAAAAGGACTTAATTC-3′), Pfhrp3-R1 (5′-TGGTGTAAGTGATGCGTAGT-3′), Pfhrp3-F2 (5′-AAATAAGAGATTATTACACGAAAG-3′) and Pfhrp3-R1. Master mix and amplification profiles were the same as for Pfhrp2. Laboratory strains Dd2 and HB3 were used as positive controls for pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion respectively.
Data analysis
A descriptive analysis was performed using Stata 16 software (StataCorp LLC, TX, USA), with proportions and frequencies detailed in tables and figures. A log transformation of relative parasitaemia was applied to compare the mean and median values. Box plots were used to show the median, the 25th, and 75th percentiles of the non-parametric test.
Ethical approval
This study was assessed and approved by the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Research Ethics Review Committee and given ethical clearance certificate # 2238 of the research proposal # 1084. Consent from study participants was sought before enrolment, guidelines and regulations that safeguard participants were also observed.
Data availability
The data sets developed during this investigation are not publicly available, however, they are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
WHO. Global Malaria report, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015791. (2020).
WHO. World Malaria Report, https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241564106/en/. (2010).
Shibeshi, W., Alemkere, G., Mulu, A. & Engidawork, E. Efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in pediatrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 21, 326 (2021).
WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria, https://www.afro.who.int/publications/guidelines-treatment-malaria-third-edition. (2015).
Falade, C. O. et al. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests and malaria microscopy for guiding malaria treatment of uncomplicated fevers in Nigeria and prereferral cases in 3 African countries. Clin. Infect. Dis. 63, S290–S297 (2016).
Mukry, S. N. et al. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria: Comparison of manual and automated diagnostic tests. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 9286392 (2017).
Ashraf, S. et al. Developing standards for malaria microscopy: External competency assessment for malaria microscopists in the Asia-Pacific. Malar. J. 11, 352 (2012).
Birhanie, M. Comparison of partec rapid malaria test with conventional light microscopy for diagnosis of malaria in Northwest Ethiopia. J. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 3479457 (2016).
Cunningham, J. et al. A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): Performance, procurement and policy. Malar. J. 18, 387 (2019).
PMI. Tanzania Malaria operation plan, https://www.pmi.gov/where-we-work/tanzania. (2015).
Ishengoma, D. S. et al. The role of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in screening of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials in low malaria transmission settings. Heal. Syst. Policy Res. 3, 1–10 (2016).
Poyer, S. et al. Availability and price of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in the public and private health sectors in 2011: Results from 10 nationally representative cross-sectional retail surveys. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 20, 744–756 (2015).
Maloney, K. et al. Expanding access to parasite-based malaria diagnosis through retail drug shops in Tanzania: Evidence from a randomized trial and implications for treatment. Malar. J. 16, 6 (2017).
Maltha, J. et al. Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (CareStart™ Malaria HRP-2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting. Malar. J. 9, 171 (2010).
Mouatcho, J. C. & Goldring, J. P. D. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: Challenges and prospects. J. Med. Microbiol. 62, 1491–1505 (2013).
WHO. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance. Results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8. 172 (2018).
Akinyi, S. et al. Multiple genetic origins of histidine-rich protein 2 gene deletion in Plasmodium falciparum parasites from Peru. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–8 (2013).
Sepúlveda, N. et al. Global analysis of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions using whole-genome sequencing data and meta-analysis. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 62, 211–219 (2018).
Marquart, L., Butterworth, A., McCarthy, J. S. & Gatton, M. L. Modelling the dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 in human malaria to better understand malaria rapid diagnostic test performance. Malar. J. 11, 74 (2012).
Ramutton, T. et al. Sequence variation does not confound the measurement of plasma PfHRP2 concentration in African children presenting with severe malaria. Malar. J. 11, 1 (2012).
Gamboa, D. et al. A large proportion of P. falciparum isolates in the Amazon region of Peru lack pfhrp2 and pfhrp3: Implications for malaria rapid diagnostic tests. PLoS ONE 5, e8091 (2010).
Kumar, N. et al. Genetic deletion of HRP2 and HRP3 in Indian Plasmodium falciparum population and false negative malaria rapid diagnostic test. Acta Trop. 125, 119–121 (2013).
Li, P. et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 in the China-Myanmar border area. Acta Trop. 152, 26–31 (2015).
Berhane, A. et al. Major threat to malaria control programs by Plasmodium falciparum lacking histidine-rich protein 2, eritrea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 462–470 (2018).
Agaba, B. B. et al. Systematic review of the status of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletion, approaches and methods used for its estimation and reporting in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Africa: Review of published studies 2010–2019. Malar. J. 18, 355 (2019).
Parr, J. B. et al. Pfhrp2-deleted Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A national cross-sectional survey. J. Infect. Dis. 216, 36–44 (2017).
Kozycki, C. T. et al. False-negative malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Rwanda: Impact of Plasmodium falciparum isolates lacking hrp2 and declining malaria transmission. Malar. J. 16, 123 (2017).
Bosco, A. B. et al. Molecular surveillance reveals the presence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in Plasmodium falciparum parasite populations in Uganda, 2017–2019. Malar. J. 19, 300 (2020).
Beshir, K. B. et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites with histidine-rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions in two endemic regions of Kenya. Sci. Rep. 7, 14718 (2017).
Thomson, R. et al. pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions that affect malaria rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium falciparum: Analysis of archived blood samples from 3 African countries. J. Infect. Dis. 220, 1444–1452 (2019).
Atroosh, W. M. et al. Genetic variation of pfhrp2 in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Yemen and the performance of HRP2-based malaria rapid diagnostic test. Parasit. Vectors 8, 1–8 (2015).
Gatton, M. L. et al. An assessment of false positive rates for malaria rapid diagnostic tests caused by non-Plasmodium infectious agents and immunological factors. PLoS ONE 13, e0197395 (2018).
Houzé, S., Boly, M. D., Le Bras, J., Deloron, P. & Faucher, J.-F. PfHRP2 and PfLDH antigen detection for monitoring the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Malar. J. 8, 211 (2009).
Abdallah, J. F. et al. Prevalence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in Puerto Lempira, Honduras. Malar. J. 14, 19 (2015).
Murillo Solano, C. et al. Deletion of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) and histidine-rich protein 3 (pfhrp3) genes in Colombian Parasites. PLoS ONE 10, e0131576 (2015).
WHO. Response plan to pfhrp2 gene deletions, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325528/WHO-CDS-GMP-2019.02-eng.pdf. (2019).
Kong, A. et al. HRP2 and HRP3 cross-reactivity and implications for HRP2-based RDT use in regions with Plasmodium falciparum hrp2 gene deletions. Malar. J. 20, 207 (2021).
Wellems, T. E. et al. A histidine-rich protein gene marks a linkage group favored strongly in a genetic cross of Plasmodium falciparum. Cell 49, 633–642 (1987).
Grignard, L. et al. A novel multiplex qPCR assay for detection of Plasmodium falciparum with histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 (pfhrp2 and pfhrp3) deletions in polyclonal infections. EBioMedicine 55, 102757 (2020).
Nolder, D. et al. Failure of rapid diagnostic tests in Plasmodium falciparum malaria cases among travelers to the UK and Ireland: Identification and characterisation of the parasites. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 108, 137–144 (2021).
Organization, W. H. Master Protocol for Surveillance of pfhrp2/3 Deletions and Biobanking to Support Future Research (World Health Organization, 2020).
Watson, O. J. et al. Modelling the drivers of the spread of Plasmodium falciparum hrp2 gene deletions in sub-Saharan Africa. Elife 6, 25008 (2017).
Kidima, W. & Nkwengulila, G. Plasmodium falciparum msp2 genotypes and multiplicity of infections among children under five years with uncomplicated malaria in Kibaha. Tanzania. J. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 721201 (2015).
Gesase, S. et al. High resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in Northern Tanzania and the emergence of dhps resistance mutation at Codon 581. PLoS ONE 4, e4569 (2009).
Alifrangis, M. et al. Five-year surveillance of molecular markers of Plasmodium falciparum antimalarial drug resistance in Korogwe District, Tanzania: Accumulation of the 581G mutation in the P. falciparum dihydropteroate synthase gene. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80, 523–527 (2009).
Thomsen, T. T. et al. Prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance gene (Pfmdr-1) in Korogwe District in Tanzania before and after introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85, 979–983 (2011).
Shekalaghe, S. A. et al. Submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriage is common in an area of low and seasonal transmission in Tanzania. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 12, 547–553 (2007).
Ohrt, C. et al. Establishing a malaria diagnostics centre of excellence in Kisumu, Kenya. Malar. J. 6, 79 (2007).
Kruhøffer, M. et al. Evaluation of the QIAsymphony SP workstation for magnetic particle—Based nucleic acid purification from different Sample types for demanding downstream applications. J. Lab. Autom. 15, 41–51 (2010).
Pillet, S., Bourlet, T. & Pozzetto, B. Comparative evaluation of the QIAsymphony RGQ system with the easyMAG/R-gene combination for the quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA load in whole blood. Virol. J. 9, 231 (2012).
Snounou, G. & Singh, B. Nested PCR analysis of Plasmodium parasites. Methods Mol. Med. 72, 189–203 (2002).
Robinson, A. et al. Molecular quantification of Plasmodium parasite density from the blood retained in used RDTs. Sci. Rep. 9, 5107 (2019).
Beshir, K. B. et al. Measuring the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs in vivo: Quantitative PCR measurement of parasite clearance. Malar. J. 9, 312 (2010).
Baker, J. et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) and its effect on the performance of PfHRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests. J. Infect. Dis. 192, 870–877 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We thank the study participants from Handeni and Moshi for their involvement in this study. This could have not been possible without the support of the district medical officers from both sites. This study was funded through the DELTAS Africa Initiative Grant # DEL-15-011 to THRiVE-2. The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS), Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust Grant # 107742/Z/15/Z and the UK government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.D.K., R.A.K., C.D., F.W.M. and K.B.B. wrote and review the main study proposal and experimental design of the study. R.D.K., F.F.T. and K.B.B. performed data analysis. R.D.K. and K.B.B. performed the molecular laboratory analysis. R.D.K. wrote the manuscript, which was revised by and R.A.K., J.J.M., F.F.T., C.J.S., K.B.B. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaaya, R.D., Kavishe, R.A., Tenu, F.F. et al. Deletions of the Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 genes are common in field isolates from north-eastern Tanzania. Sci Rep 12, 5802 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09878-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09878-3
This article is cited by
-
Plasmodium falciparum pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions among patients enrolled at 100 health facilities throughout Tanzania: February to July 2021
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Field evaluation of the novel One Step Malaria Pf and Pf/Pv rapid diagnostic tests and the proportion of HRP-2 gene deletion identified on samples collected in the Pwani region, Tanzania
Bulletin of the National Research Centre (2023)
-
First field and laboratory evaluation of LAMP assay for malaria diagnosis in Cubal, Angola
Parasites & Vectors (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.