Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to dementia and behavioral changes. Extracellular deposition of amyloid plaques (Aβ) and intracellular deposition of neurofibrillary tangles in neurons are the major pathogenicities of AD. However, drugs targeting these therapeutic targets are not effective. Therefore, novel targets for the treatment of AD urgently need to be identified. Expression of the mesoderm-specific transcript (Mest) is regulated by genomic imprinting, where only the paternal allele is active for transcription. We identified hypermethylation on the Mest promoter, which led to a reduction in Mest mRNA levels and activation of Wnt signaling in brain tissues of AD patients. Mest knockout (KO) using the CRIPSR/Cas9 system in mouse embryonic stem cells and P19 embryonic carcinoma cells leads to neuronal differentiation arrest. Depletion of Mest in primary hippocampal neurons via lentivirus expressing shMest or inducible KO system causes neurodegeneration. Notably, depletion of Mest in primary cortical neurons of rats leads to tau phosphorylation at the S199 and T231 sites. Overall, our data suggest that hypermethylation of the Mest promoter may cause or facilitate the progression of AD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Misregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is one of the major causes of diseases, due to the role of this pathway in cell proliferation, self-renewal, and cell fate determination during embryonic development and tissue homeostasis in adults1. Mutations in Wnt signaling components are tightly linked with age-related neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD)2. Previous studies have reported an association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in LRP6 (LDLR (low-density lipoprotein receptor)-related protein 6), a co-receptor of Wnt ligand, and late-onset AD. The LRP6 Val 1062 allele showed reduced β-catenin signaling3. Mesoderm-specific transcript (Mest) is a paternally expressed gene that is abundantly expressed in the mesodermal tissue and adult brain4,5. Mest belongs to the α-β hydrolase protein family6. Although several reports have shown that Mest regulates diverse biological processes, its exact biochemical function has not yet been characterized. We previously showed that Mest acts as a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by inhibiting the maturation and membrane localization of LRP67. In addition, Mest knockdown blocked adipocyte differentiation via Wnt signaling activation. Mest also plays a role in brain development by regulating the neuronal migration required for the formation of the neocortex8. Furthermore, Mest is specifically expressed in the substantia nigra (SN) and is required for the maintenance of SN neuronal subset9. Neuronal loss due to Mest ablation is likely due to the disruption in Wnt signaling. Recently, Mest has also been reported to be involved in the maturation of mammary glands10.
Genomic imprinting refers to the mono-allelic expression of a specific gene due to parent-specific methylation of the gene’s promoter11. Mest is expressed only from the paternal genome, since the maternal gene promoter is methylated. Loss of imprinting (LOI) of Mest is often correlated with altered growth12. Mest is a candidate gene for Silver-Russell Syndrome13, and hypermethylation of the Mest promoter is associated with oligozoospermia14. In addition, LOI of Mest is also involved in breast, colorectal, and lung cancers15,16,17. Genomic imprinting is loosely controlled during aging. Since aberrant Mest hypermethylation and LOI are often associated with various diseases, it is vital to study the functional role and methylation status of the Mest promoter in AD patients.
Epigenome-wide association studies in AD patients suggested that the Mest promoter is potentially hypermethylated in the cortex of AD patients18. However, the underlying mechanism of how Mest promoter hypermethylation is associated with AD pathology remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the methylation status of the Mest promoter and its effect on Wnt signaling using neurons and brain samples from AD patients. We showed that the Mest promoter was hypermethylated in AD patients and Mest mRNA levels were reduced, while the Wnt target genes were elevated. Mest depletion resulted in the upregulation of Wnt signaling and tau phosphorylation, causing neurodegeneration.
Materials and methods
Postmortem brain samples
Frozen postmortem human cortex samples from nine AD patients and nine age-matched controls were used in this study. Neuropathological examination of age-matched controls and AD human brain samples was performed using procedures previously established at the Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Center (BUADC). Next of kin provided informed consent for participation and brain donation. Institutional review board approval for ethical permission was obtained through BUADC. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of the Boston University School of Medicine (Protocol H-28974) and was approved for exemption because it only included tissues collected from post-mortem subjects not classified as human subjects. The study was performed in accordance with the institutional regulatory guidelines and principles of human subject protection in the Declaration of Helsinki. Sample information is listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
DNA extraction and bisulfite conversion
Total genomic DNA was isolated from postmortem frontal cortex of AD patients using an AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, K-3032), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each 500 ng of genomic DNA was subjected to bisulfite conversion using an EZ DNA methylation kit (Zymo Research, D5001), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Mest promoter amplification and bisulfite sequencing
Individual genomic DNA was amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 3. Amplification was performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 35 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and then isolated from the gel slices using a Gel Extraction Kit (ELPIS BIOTECH, EBD-1005, South Korea). The PCR products were subcloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, A1360) and the selected plasmid DNA was extracted using a DNA isolation kit (LaboPass, CMP0112). The plasmid was sequenced using the M13 forward and reverse primers (Bionics, Seoul, South Korea). Sequences were analyzed using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293FT (Invitrogen) cells were maintained in high glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1 mM MEM non-essential amino acids (NEAA), 2 mM ʟ-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 500 µg/ml Geneticin, and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and E14 cell lines were used for the experiments. mESCs were cultured on a tissue culture dish pre-coated with 0.2% gelatin (Sigma) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. mESC culture medium consisted of Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (Sigma), 15% fetal bovine serum (Bio West), Tylosine (Sigma), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), 100X nonessential amino acid (Corning), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 100X GlutaMAX (Gibco) and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF)-conditioned medium. LIF-conditioned medium was prepared as previously described19. All cell lines were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator and passaged every 2–3 days.
For neuronal differentiation, 1.0 × 104 undifferentiated mESCs were plated in each well of a 6-well plate pre-coated with 0.2% gelatin. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with N2B27 medium composed of equal amounts of DMEM/F-12 (Welgene, South Korea) and neurobasal media (Gibco) supplemented with N2 (Gibco) medium, B27 (Gibco), GlutaMAX (Gibco), 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), and 7.5% BSA (Gibco). The N2B27 medium was changed every 2 days.
For embryonic body (EB) differentiation, mESCs were trypsinized and plated on low-attachment Petri dishes (1000 cells per drop) using the hanging drop technique in mESC culture medium without LIF. After 3 days, EBs were formed and moved to a new tissue culture dish containing fresh mESC culture medium and allowed to differentiate further. The culture medium was replaced every 2 days and cells were harvested at day 0 and day 5.
P19 cell culture and differentiation
P19 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells were cultured in minimum essential medium α (Gibco) supplemented with 7.5% newborn calf serum (Gibco), 2.5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in humidified 5% CO2. To induce P19 EC neuronal differentiation, they were aggregated in bacterial-grade Petri dishes containing 1 μM all-trans-retinoic acid (Sigma) at a density of 1 × 105/ml. The medium was replaced with fresh medium containing retinoic acid after 2 days. After 4 days, aggregates were dissociated using 0.05% trypsin, re-plated in poly-D-lysine(PDL) and laminin-coated tissue culture dishes, and then allowed to differentiate in neurobasal medium containing 2% B27 supplement, 0.5 mM ʟ-glutamine, 25 μM ʟ-glutamate, and 1% antibiotics mixture.
Primary hippocampal culture
Primary mouse hippocampal neuronal cell cultures were prepared from ICR (Young Bio, South Korea) mice, as previously described20. Experiments were conducted following standard ethical guidelines and were approved by the University of Seoul Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (UOS IACUC). Briefly, the hippocampus was isolated from embryonic day 18.5 mouse embryos using Hank’s balanced salt solution. Isolated hippocampi were trypsinized and triturated with fire-polished Pasteur pipettes and then strained through a 40-μm nylon mesh. These cells were then cultured in neurobasal medium containing 2% B27 supplement, 25 μM ʟ-Glutamate, 0.5 mM ʟ-glutamine, and 1% antibiotics mixture. The same growth medium, but without glutamate and antibiotics, was used as replacement medium after 4 days. Half of the medium was changed once a week.
Lentivirus preparation and infection
Lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting GFP and shRNA targeting Mest was inserted into a lentivirus vector (Invitrogen, BLOCK-iT™ Lentiviral RNAi Expression System, #K4944-00). The shRNA sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 4. The shRNA lentivirus was packaged in 293FT cells following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 24 h prior to transfection, ~ 5 × 106 HEK293FT cells were seeded into 100-mm tissue culture plates in DMEM high glucose medium. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Invitrogen). The virus-containing medium was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris and passed through a sterile 0.45-µm filter. The viral supernatant was mixed with PEG-it™ Virus Precipitation Solution (SBI System Biosciences, # LV810A-1) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After overnight incubation, the mixture was centrifuged, and the viral pellet was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and titrated using the qPCR Lentivirus Titration Kit (ABM, #LV900). Virus aliquots were stored at -80 °C. The enriched lentivirus particles were used for primary hippocampal neuron infection in the presence of 5 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma).
Generation of P19 Mest-inducible KO cells using lentiviral split Cas9 system
The lentiviral split Cas9 (LSC-5) vector was digested using the BsmBI enzyme. The annealed Mest gRNAs were then ligated into a linearized vector using the golden gate reaction21. Lentiviruses for LSC-5 vectors were prepared as previously described21. P19 cells were transduced with LSC-5 lentivirus in medium supplemented with 5 μg/mL polybrene (Sigma, #H9268). The transduced cells were selected after 7 days using 3 μg/mL puromycin (Sigma, # P7255). The expression of the LSC-5 vector component FKBP rapamycin binding (FRB) domains was validated in P19 LSC-5 control and Mest gRNA stable cells using qPCR. The stably-selected LSC-5 cells were cultured in rapamycin (200 nM)-containing medium for 5 days. P19 LSC-5 stable cells were incubated in a Petri dish containing retinoic acid and rapamycin for 4 days to induce embryonic body formation. The aggregates were then dissociated into single cells using 0.05% trypsin. Single cells were plated on a PDL-laminin-coated culture dish in neurobasal medium containing B27 and rapamycin for 11 days to promote neuronal differentiation. The Rapamycin-containing medium was changed every day to induce gRNA activation.
Generation of Mest gene KO lines from P19 and E14 cells using CRISPR-Cas9
The gRNA was designed to target the unique sequences present in Exon 3 of the Mest gene using DNA 2.0 (https://www.atum.bio/). The Mest gRNA cassette was then PCR-amplified from the template plasmid (pLKO-gRNA-Gsk3α) using the primer sequences listed in Supplementary Table 4. The pLKO.1-TRC plasmid was digested with AgeI and EcoRI to obtain vector fragments. The pLKO.1-Mest gRNA vector was constructed using the NEB Gibson assembly kit (# E5510). For stable expression of Cas9, E14 and P19 cells were co-transfected with PB-CAG-hCas9-IRES-hygro and PiggyBac Transposase vector using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Cas9 stably-expressing cell lines, E14-Cas9 and P19-Cas9, were established by adding hygromycin (200 μg/ml) to the medium for 2 weeks after transfection.
To package the Mest gRNA lentivirus, packaging plasmids psPAX2, VSV-G, and pLKO.1-Mest gRNA vectors were co-transfected into HEK293FT cells using Lipofectamine 2000. After 72 h, the supernatant was collected, passed through 0.45 μm filters (Corning, #431225), and concentrated with PEG-it Virus Precipitation Solution (SBI System Biosciences, # LV810A-1). The concentrated lentivirus was added into the culture medium containing E14 Cas9 and P19 Cas9 stable cells in the presence of 5 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma) to facilitate gRNA expression. After 3 days, puromycin (3 μg/ml) was added to the cell culture medium for 14 days to stably select cells expressing Mest gRNAs.
Genomic DNA was isolated using the AccuPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Daejon, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplicons, including Cas9 nuclease target sites, were amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 4. The T7E1 assay was performed as previously described22.
Immunofluorescence analysis
The P19 and primary hippocampal neurons were seeded onto poly-D-lysine and laminin-coated glass coverslips in 12‐well plates, fixed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and then permeabilized at room temperature for 20 min with 0.1% Triton X‐100 in PBS. Coverslips were washed once with PBS and blocked for 2 h with 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Bio basic) in PBS, and then incubated overnight with the primary antibodies. The anti-neuron-specific β-III tubulin (R&D Systems, #MAB1195) antibody and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) (Cell Signaling Technology, #9661) antibody was diluted in 1% (w/v) BSA and incubated at 4 °C. The coverslips were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with the secondary antibodies diluted in 1% (w/v) BSA for 2 h. The following secondary antibodies from Invitrogen were used for staining: Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (# A-11034), Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-mouse IgG (# A-11030), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (# A-11029), and Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (# A-11035). For nuclei staining, Hoechst 33342 solution or DAPI was added to each sample and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Fluorescent images were captured using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 700).
Immunoblotting
Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (REF 11836170001) and p-stop (REF 04906837001). Lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to isolate soluble proteins. Equal amounts of proteins were boiled with loading sample buffer (NuPAGE LDS; Invitrogen, CA, USA) containing 5% 2-mercaptoethanol for 10 min, resolved using 10% SDS–PAGE, and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Pall Corporation, New York, United States). After blocking with 5% dry milk for 1 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA. The following day, the membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline solution containing 0.1% Tween and then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse #115-035-003 and goat anti-rabbit #111–035-003, Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, PA, USA) or Rabbit TrueBlot antibody (eBioscience, San Diego, USA).
Rabbit monoclonal anti-Mest (#ab151564), anti-Tau (phospho S199) (#ab4749), and anti-Tau (phospho T231) (#ab151559) antibodies were obtained from Abcam. Mouse monoclonal anti-vinculin (#V9131) and anti‐β‐actin antibodies were obtained from Sigma. Rabbit monoclonal anti-LRP6 (#3395S), anti-p-LRP6 (#2568S) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling. Mouse monoclonal anti-β-catenin (#610154) antibody was obtained from BD Bioscience and mouse monoclonal anti-active β-catenin (#05-665) antibody was obtained from Millipore. Mouse monoclonal anti-total Tau (#SC-32274) antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz.
Isolation of mRNA and qPCR analysis
For quantitative real-time PCR, total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and cDNA synthesis was performed using ImProm‐II™ Reverse Transcriptase (#A3802, Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out using CFX Connect Real-Time PCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The primer sequences used for qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Statistical analysis
All statistical data are expressed as the mean ± SD, and the sample size is indicated in each figure legend. Most experiments were conducted in triplicate. The statistical significance of differences between groups was analyzed using Student’s t-test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 ****, and p < 0.0001 represent different degrees of significance.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Neuropathological examination of age-matched controls and human brain samples from AD patients was performed using procedures previously established at the Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Center (BUADC). Next of kin provided informed consent for participation and brain donation. Institutional review board approval for ethical permission was obtained through BUADC. This study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of the Boston University School of Medicine (Protocol H-28974) and was approved for exemption because it only included tissues collected from post-mortem subjects not classified as human subjects. The study was performed with informed consent according to protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Seoul.
Results
Hypermethylation of Mest promoter and upregulation of Wnt signaling in brain samples of AD patients
Rao et al. reported that the frontal cortex of AD patients showed hypermethylation of CpG islands in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), synaptophysin promoters, and increased global DNA methylation23. To check whether sporadic AD patients show any differences in CpG methylation in the Mest promoter regions, we analyzed DNA samples extracted from the temporal cortex of postmortem sporadic AD patients and age-matched controls. The clinical characteristics of the control and AD patients are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. The differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of the Mest gene promoter are shown in Fig. 1a. Interestingly, when hypermethylation and hypomethylation were defined as overall percentage of methylated CpGs of more than 60% or less than 30% in each sample, respectively, 44.4% of the AD cases showed hypermethylation in the Mest promoter in comparison to 11.1% of the age-matched controls (Fig. 1b, c). Our results are consistent with reports that cortex-specific Mest promoter hypermethylation is associated with AD neuropathology18.
Mest mRNA levels were decreased in the temporal cortex of sporadic AD postmortem brains in comparison to age-matched controls (n = 7) (Fig. 1d). Canonical Wnt target genes (Axin2 and c-Myc) were also upregulated in AD patients, which is consistent with the previously reported role of Mest as a negative regulator of Wnt signaling (Fig. 1e) 7. These results suggest a potential link between hypermethylation of the Mest promoter and elevation of Wnt signaling in AD.
Mest KO in embryonic carcinoma and embryonic stem cells leads to neuron differentiation blockade
To assess the functional significance of Mest in neurons, P19 embryonic carcinoma cells were differentiated into neuronal lineages24,25 and the mRNA and protein levels were examined (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). The levels of both Mest mRNA and protein increased during neuronal differentiation (Fig. 2a, b). Next, we generated P19 Mest KO cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The presence of insertion–deletion (indel) mutations was confirmed using a T7 endonuclease 1 (T7E1) assay and genomic DNA sequencing (Fig. 2c, d). Mest mRNA and protein levels were significantly reduced in KO clones (Fig. 2e, f). P19 Mest KO cells exhibited arrest of neuron differentiation with increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 2g).
We also investigated the role of Mest in the early differentiation of mESCs by generating Mest KO mESCs. Mest protein and mRNA levels were significantly reduced in Mest KO cells compared with the controls (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Indel mutations were also observed in Mest KO clones (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Mest levels increased during neuronal differentiation, whereas levels of the neuronal differentiation marker, Nestin, decreased significantly in Mest KO cells (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). Using the embryonic body (EB) differentiation method, we checked Mest levels during differentiation. We found that Mest expression was downregulated in mESCs and increased with differentiation (Supplementary Fig. 2f). Various lineage-specific markers (Nestin, GSC, and GATA4) were significantly impaired during the differentiation of Mest KO cells, suggesting that Mest depletion affects the differentiation potential of mESCs (Supplementary Fig. 2g–i).
Mest depletion results in elevation of Wnt signaling and tau phosphorylation, leading to neurodegeneration
To examine the effect of abnormal Wnt/β-catenin signaling levels on neurodegeneration, primary hippocampal neurons of days in vitro (DIV) 7 were treated with small molecules that regulate Wnt signaling. XAV939 antagonizes Wnt signaling by stimulating β-catenin degradation and stabilizing Axin26. Hippocampal neurons treated with XAV939 showed increased apoptosis and neurodegeneration (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b, a’). These results are consistent with our previous reports that reduced Wnt signaling leads to neurodegeneration via the small molecule ICG-00120. The glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3) inhibitor, LiCl, was used as a Wnt signaling activator27. Treatment with LiCl also resulted in an increase in apoptotic cells and neurodegeneration (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d, b’). Similarly, treatment with either XAV939 or LiCl significantly reduced neuronal markers in P19 day 8 neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). Consistently, Wnt target genes were downregulated and upregulated in the XAV939-and LiCl-treated groups, respectively. Overall, both activation and inhibition of Wnt signaling led to neurodegeneration, indicating that Wnt signaling must be maintained at controlled levels for neurons to survive.
Next, to mimic the low levels of Mest in AD patients, we employed an inducible split-Cas9 system to suppress endogenous Mest expression21. LSC-5 Mest gRNA was constructed and transduced into P19 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Treatment of P19 LSC-5 Mest gRNA stable cells with rapamycin suppressed Mest mRNA expression and increased Wnt target gene levels (Fig. 3a). Mest inducible KO (MiKO) cells also showed a reduction in the levels of neuronal markers. MiKO cells formed large aggregates, whereas control cells exhibited proper neurite formation (Fig. 3b). Immunofluorescence examination showed that control cells had intact neuron morphology with decent neuronal differentiation upon staining with Tuj1, whereas MiKO cells displayed fragmented neurites with few surviving neurons and positive signals for cleaved caspase 3 (Fig. 3b). Levels of Wnt signaling components such as p-LRP6, β-catenin, and active form of β-catenin (ABC) were also elevated in MiKO cells (Fig. 3c). These findings suggest that Mest suppression forced the activation of Wnt signaling, resulting in neurodegeneration.
To corroborate our findings, primary hippocampal neurons were transduced with the shMest lentivirus, and the RNA samples were isolated from the same infections to perform Real time PCR analysis for neuronal markers and Wnt target genes (Axin 2 and cyclin D1). The mRNA expression of neuronal markers in Mest knockdown cells was significantly downregulated, while the expressions of Wnt target genes were upregulated (Fig. 3d). A recent study showed increased Wnt signaling in the brains of AD patients28 which is consistent with our findings. Mest knockdown neurons also stained positive for cleaved caspase 3 (CC3), suggesting the occurrence of apoptosis, while shGFP-treated cells remained intact with the expression of Tuj1 (Fig. 3e). Tau phosphorylation causes the formation of neurofibrillary tangles. A gradual increase in Tau phosphorylation at Tyr18, Thr231, and Ser199 sites correlate with AD severity29. Interestingly, we found that Mest knockdown in rat cortical neurons increased tau phosphorylation at Ser199 and Thr231 residues (Fig. 3f). Overall, these results demonstrate that Mest suppression results in increased Wnt signaling and tau phosphorylation, possibly causing neurodegeneration.
Discussion
Wnt signaling plays an essential role in neuron maturation, synaptogenesis, axonal remodeling, and long-term potentiation. These processes are impaired in AD, lending support to the view that Wnt signaling is a possible choice for genetic studies aimed at understanding AD pathogenesis30,31,32. The changes in protein levels were most noticeable in β-catenin, GSK3β, and transcription factor 7 like 1(TCF7L1), indicative of altered Wnt signaling in AD33. In this regard, common genetic variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms) of LRP6, Disheveled 1, and GSK3β are found in AD3,34,35,36. Although the mechanisms are not entirely understood, Wnt signaling has both pathogenic and protective roles in AD37. In rat hippocampal neurons, Wnt3a treatment showed protective function by reducing Aβ toxicity and tau phosphorylation38. In contrast, familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD)-linked presenilin 1 (PSEN1) mutations (M146L and M146V) increase β-catenin levels and Wnt target gene expression, resulting in pathogenic effects39,40. Our data support the hypothesis that over-activation of Wnt signaling upon Mest depletion causes neurodegeneration of hippocampal neurons (Fig. 3).
AD progression may potentiate pathological changes due to epigenetic regulation. The basis for methylation changes in AD are still unclear. Studies have shown that the promoter region of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene is hypomethylated after the age of 70 years, which might result in its aberrant expression, thus generating excessive Aβ41. Neprilysin is a vital Aβ-degrading enzyme in the brain and its promoter is highly methylated, resulting in the accumulation of Aβ42. The current study revealed that Mest promoter hypermethylation may be the epigenetic mechanism responsible for the reduction of Mest mRNA levels in AD patients (Fig. 1). Our results also corroborate previous reports that the Mest promoter is hypermethylated and its mRNA level is significantly decreased in AD brains18,43. The reasons for the enrichment of hypermethylated alleles in the Mest promoter in AD patients is unclear and requires further study. It will be interesting to elucidate the upstream mechanisms that cause hypermethylation of the Mest promoter in the brains of AD patients.
Tau protein is predominantly phosphorylated at Ser/Thr-Pro sites, causing the formation of neurofibrillary tangles44. In the present study, we showed that Mest depletion caused tau hyperphosphorylation at the Ser199 and Thr231 sites in rat cortical neurons (Fig. 3f). Microarray studies on AD cortex with neurofibrillary tangles also showed diminished Mest levels45. Determining the tau kinase responsible for tau phosphorylation upon Mest reduction requires further investigation.
The current results should be interpreted with caution, as a larger number of AD patient samples should be analyzed. The role of Mest in other signaling pathways remains unclear. In conclusion, we found that hypermethylation of the Mest promoter causes a reduction in Mest mRNA levels and activation of Wnt signaling in the brain tissues of AD patients. Unfolding the epigenetic modifications i.e. Mest promoter hypermethylation, may provide new insights into the underlying mechanisms that influence neurodegeneration and AD progression.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.
References
Clevers, H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 127, 469–480 (2006).
Logan, C. Y. & Nusse, R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 781–810 (2004).
De Ferrari, G. V. et al. Common genetic variation within the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 9434–9439 (2007).
Lefebvre, L. et al. Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat. Genet. 20, 163 (1998).
Sado, T., Nakajima, N., Tada, M. & Takagi, N. A novel mesoderm-specific cDNA isolated from a mouse embryonal carcinoma cell line: (Embryonal carcinoma cell/cDNA/in situ hybridization/mesoderm/mouse embryo). Dev. Growth Differ. 35, 551–560 (1993).
Tilghman, S. M. The sins of the fathers and mothers: Genomic imprinting in mammalian development. Cell 96, 185–193 (1999).
Jung, H., Lee, S. K. & Jho, E.-H. Mest/Peg1 inhibits Wnt signalling through regulation of LRP6 glycosylation. Biochem. J. 436, 263–269 (2011).
Ji, L. et al. Defective neuronal migration and inhibition of bipolar to multipolar transition of migrating neural cells by mesoderm-specific transcript, Mest, in the developing mouse neocortex. Neuroscience 355, 126–140 (2017).
Mesman, S., van Hooft, J. A. & Smidt, M. P. Mest/Peg1 is essential for the development and maintenance of a SNc neuronal subset. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 9, 166 (2017).
Yonekura, S. et al. Peg1/Mest, an imprinted gene, is involved in mammary gland maturation. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 1080–1087 (2019).
Reik, W. & Walter, J. Genomic imprinting: Parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 21 (2001).
Shi, W. et al. Loss-of-imprinting of Peg1 in mouse interspecies hybrids is correlated with altered growth. Genesis 39, 65–72 (2004).
Kagami, M., Nagai, T., Fukami, M., Yamazawa, K. & Ogata, T. Silver-Russell syndrome in a girl born after in vitro fertilization: Partial hypermethylation at the differentially methylated region of PEG1/MEST. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 24, 131–136 (2007).
Marques, C. et al. Abnormal methylation of imprinted genes in human sperm is associated with oligozoospermia. MHR-Basic Sci. Reprod. Med. 14, 67–74 (2008).
Nakanishi, H. et al. Loss of imprinting of PEG1/MEST in lung cancer cell lines. Oncol. Rep. 12, 1273–1278 (2004).
Pedersen, I. S. et al. Frequent loss of imprinting of PEG1/MEST in invasive breast cancer. Can. Res. 59, 5449–5451 (1999).
Nishihara, S. et al. Multipoint imprinting analysis in sporadic colorectal cancers with and without microsatellite instability. Int. J. Oncol. 17, 317–339 (2000).
Lunnon, K. et al. Methylomic profiling implicates cortical deregulation of ANK1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1164–1170 (2014).
Smith, A. G. Culture and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J. Tissue Cult. Methods 13, 89–94 (1991).
Kim, H. et al. Downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling causes degeneration of hippocampal neurons in vivo. Neurobiol. Aging 32(2316), e2311-e2316.e2315 (2011).
Zetsche, B., Volz, S. E. & Zhang, F. A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 139 (2015).
Kim, H. J., Lee, H. J., Kim, H., Cho, S. W. & Kim, J.-S. Targeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly. Genome Res. 19, 1279–1288 (2009).
Rao, J., Keleshian, V., Klein, S. & Rapoport, S. Epigenetic modifications in frontal cortex from Alzheimer’s disease and bipolar disorder patients. Transl. Psychiatry 2, e132 (2012).
McBurney, M. P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 37, 135–140 (2003).
McBurney, M. W., Jones-Villeneuve, E., Edwards, M. & Anderson, P. Control of muscle and neuronal differentiation in a cultured embryonal carcinoma cell line. Nature 299, 165 (1982).
Huang, S.-M.A. et al. Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling. Nature 461, 614 (2009).
Wu, D. & Pan, W. GSK3: A multifaceted kinase in Wnt signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 161–168 (2010).
Liu, E. et al. Tau acetylates and stabilizes β-catenin thereby promoting cell survival. EMBO Rep. 21, e48328 (2020).
Neddens, J. et al. Phosphorylation of different tau sites during progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6, 52 (2018).
Rosso, S. B. & Inestrosa, N. C. WNT signaling in neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 103 (2013).
Purro, S. A. et al. Wnt regulates axon behavior through changes in microtubule growth directionality: A new role for adenomatous polyposis coli. J. Neurosci. 28, 8644–8654 (2008).
Chen, J., Park, C. S. & Tang, S.-J. Activity-dependent synaptic Wnt release regulates hippocampal long term potentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11910–11916 (2006).
Riise, J., Plath, N., Pakkenberg, B. & Parachikova, A. Aberrant Wnt signaling pathway in medial temporal lobe structures of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 122, 1303–1318 (2015).
Mateo, I. et al. Association between glycogen synthase kinase-3β genetic polymorphism and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 21, 228–232 (2006).
Russ, C., Lovestone, S. & Powell, J. Identification of sequence variants and analysis of the role of the glycogen synthase kinase 3 β gene and promoter in late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 6, 320 (2001).
Russ, C., Lovestone, S. & Powell, J. Identification of genomic organisation, sequence variants and analysis of the role of the human dishevelled 1 gene in late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 7, 104 (2002).
Boonen, R. A., van Tijn, P. & Zivkovic, D. Wnt signaling in Alzheimer’s disease: Up or down, that is the question. Ageing Res. Rev. 8, 71–82 (2009).
Alvarez, A. R. et al. Wnt-3a overcomes β-amyloid toxicity in rat hippocampal neurons. Exp. Cell Res. 297, 186–196 (2004).
Malik, B. et al. Loss of neuronal cell cycle control as a mechanism of neurodegeneration in the presenilin-1 Alzheimer’s disease brain. Cell Cycle 7, 637–646 (2008).
Kang, D. E. et al. Presenilin 1 facilitates the constitutive turnover of β-catenin: Differential activity of Alzheimer’s disease–linked PS1 mutants in the β-catenin–signaling pathway. J. Neurosci. 19, 4229–4237 (1999).
Marques, S. C., Oliveira, C. R., Pereira, C. M. & Outeiro, T. F. Epigenetics in neurodegeneration: A new layer of complexity. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 348–355 (2011).
Chen, K.-L. et al. The epigenetic effects of amyloid-β1–40 on global DNA and neprilysin genes in murine cerebral endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 378, 57–61 (2009).
Moradifard, S., Hoseinbeyki, M., Ganji, S. M. & Minuchehr, Z. Analysis of microRNA and gene expression profiles in Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis approach. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–17 (2018).
Johnson, G. V. & Stoothoff, W. H. Tau phosphorylation in neuronal cell function and dysfunction. J. Cell Sci. 117, 5721–5729 (2004).
Dunckley, T. et al. Gene expression correlates of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 27, 1359–1371 (2006).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge members of Jho’s laboratory for their helpful discussions.
Funding
This study was supported by Grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea to E. Jho (NRF-2017M3A9B4062421 and 2020R1A2C3013746) and H.R (NRF-2018M3C7A1056894).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.P., Y.S., and A.T. conducted cell culture experiments and interpreted the data. H.J. and S.M. designed and conducted bisulfite sequencing. M.S. and W.S. conducted confocal imaging and interpreted the data. J.L .and H.R. provided mRNA data from age-matched controls and Alzheimer’s disease brains. R.P., H.J., A.T., and E.J. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.R., H.K.L., and E.J. designed and supervised the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Prasad, R., Jung, H., Tan, A. et al. Hypermethylation of Mest promoter causes aberrant Wnt signaling in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 11, 20075 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99562-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99562-9
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.