Introduction

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumors and can be found in all age groups1,2. Patients with lower-grade gliomas of WHO grade 2 and 3 (LGG) are usually younger than those harboring a glioblastoma WHO grade 43 and commonly have a more favorable course. Nevertheless, LGGs often exhibit malignant degeneration further limiting overall survival4. Nowadays, the influence of genetic features is considered to be more important than the phenotype or WHO grade alone5. Patients with IDH-wild type anaplastic astrocytomas were found to show worse outcome than IDH mutated glioblastomas6.

The absolute number of older patients diagnosed with WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas will increase in the future due to rising availability of neuroimaging7 in combination with the advancing age of the general population. The proportion of people over 65 in the European Union is expected to increase from 31.4% in 2019 to 52.0% in 2050 8. This can be translated to all industrialized countries.

The initial treatment of choice is complete resection of the tumor9,10,11. The extent of resection in older patients with gliomas has been reported to be lower in an attempt to minimize neurological deficits and thus avoid secondary age-related complications. Not surprisingly, overall survival in this cohort was below the published median12,13,14. Preoperative tumor volumes, molecular characteristics and/or the recent WHO classification, however, have often not been taken into account in elderly glioma patients. Moreover, variable age cutoffs between 55 and 65 years have been used14,15,16, which does not reflect contemporary observations of increased disability-free life years according to the changed general life expectancy17,18. Thus, previous data may not affect the current trends of aged populations in neuro-oncology.

The aim of our study was therefore to investigate age-related prognostic features in terms of clinical, neuropathological and radiological examinations of diffuse and anaplastic gliomas WHO grade 2 and 3. A cut-off for age was avoided to determine the effect of each additional year of life.

Materials and methods

All consecutive adult patients with neuropathologically proved intracranial WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas, operated in our center for their first resection between January 2010 and March 2018, were selected from our prospective neurooncological database. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Medical University Innsbruck (AN5220 329/4.4) and written informed content was acquired from all participants. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Preoperative and postoperative MRI within 72 h were performed including T1-weighted Gadolinum-contrasted as well as native T1, T2, FLAIR and DWI sequences as the standard of care for patients harboring intracranial tumors19. The metric volume of alteration was manually measured using segmentation in ITK-SNAP software (v.3.8.0 for Mac OS, UPenn and UNC dev., http://www.itksnap.org) in T1 with contrast enhancement (CE) as well as native T1, T2, FLAIR and DWI sequences20,21.

Neuropathological examination was routinely performed on FFP-embedded tissue. Integrated neuropathological reports were based on the WHO grading system22,23. Presence of IDH1 mutation in the R132H position was assessed with IHC and, in case of negative result, DNA sequencing was performed for patients under 40 years to approve the IDH1 wild-type status. Nuclear ATRX and EGFR expression were tested with IHC. In case of lost ATRX, the oligodendroglial genotype was proved with the unbalanced co-deletion of 1p/19q chromosomal regions through Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

After the final neuropathological conclusion, each case was individually discussed in the institutional multidisciplinary tumor-board to establish the adjuvant management. The standardized recommendation was based on international guidelines10,11,24,25. In case of higher risk tumors – anaplastic glioma, incomplete resection, wild-type IDH1 or lost nuclear ATRX – the radio-chemotherapy according to previously published protocols11,26 was applied; and if the mentioned higher risk tumor criteria were absent, the wait and see strategy was chosen.

Statistical analysis and graphics generation was processed using IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac OS, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software). For analysis, patients were divided in two groups according to the median age: younger than median and older than median. Normal distribution of scale parameters was checked by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Correlations for non-parametric data were determined using the Spearman’s method. T-Tests for normal distributed scale parameters, Mann–Whitney U-test for rank and scale parameters lacking normal distribution, and Chi2-test comparing two binominal parameters were applied according to general terms of these tests. The linear and Cox regressions were used to reveal the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) dependencies. The Holm-Bonferroni (H-B) correction was corrected for multiple hypothesis27,28. The confidence interval and α were defined as 95%.

Ethics approval

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The database and tissue bank are approved by the ethics committee of Medical University Innsbruck (AN5220 329/4.4).

Consent to participate

Written informed content was acquired from the participants.

Consent to publication

No individual data is showed separately in the manuscript. All data is used only after anonymized statistical processing and is described with pool results.

Results

In total, 99 patients were eligible for the analysis: 55 (56%) males and 44 (44%) females with a mean age of 46 years (SD ± 16; range 18–85). Patients harboring more aggressive tumors were older: 47 patients with diffuse glioma had a mean age of 40 years (SD ± 14) compared to 51 years (SD ± 16) in 52 patients with anaplastic transformed gliomas (p < 0.001, H-B: 0.003). IDH1 was mutated in 71% and wild-type in 29% of cases. ATRX was expressed in 62% and lost in 38% of LGG samples.

Patients with IDH1 mutation were found to be younger compared to those with wild-type: 43 years (SD ± 13) vs. 54 years (SD ± 18) respectively (p = 0.008, H-B: 0.012). That was also the case for the loss of nuclear ATRX expression: 39 years (SD ± 11) vs. 51 years (SD ± 16) respectively (p = 0.006, H-B: 0.012).

CE was present in 26% (13/50 of < 45y.) of cases in younger group and in 63% (31/49 of ≥ 45y.) of cases in older group (p < 0.001). Patients with higher age, who had IDH wild-type glioma, showed CE more frequently (p = 0.02); on the other hand, we could not find analogous dependency in case of IDH-mutated tumors (p = 0.11). CE volume before resection directly correlated with age, while the native volumes did not show differences (Table 1).

Table 1 Median tumor volume in various MRI sequences before resection.

There were no differences in the extent of resection in relation to age. Complete resection of contrast enhancing tumor parts, if present, was achieved in 88% compared to 74% (younger vs. older; p > 0.05). Thus, 96% patients of younger group and 93% of older group did not have any CE after resection. The volume of residual CE tumor, however, correlated with age; r = 0.27, p = 0.013. The probability of gross total resection for FLAIR (83% vs. 78%) and DWI (85% vs. 78%) was similar between our age-related groups, p > 0.05.

Mean follow-up was 54 months (SE ± 32; range 5–115) in our series, whereas 47 (47%) patients reached oncological progression (Fig. 1) and 26 (26%) deceased (Fig. 2). PFS in older patients was significantly lower according to Cox regression: HR = 1.032 per year of life (CI95% 1.012–1.051; p = 0.001). One year of life reduced PFS for 9 days (0.29 months) in linear regression:

$$d{\text{PFS}} = - 0.29 \times {\text{Age}}$$
$$[{\text{change of PFS in months}} = - 0.29\,\left( {{\text{SE}} \pm 0.14} \right) \times {\text{age in years}}\;({\text{ANOVA p}} < 0.001,\;{\text{p}} = 0.047)]$$
Figure 1
figure 1

Achieved PFS in relation to age.

Figure 2
figure 2

Achieved OS in relation to age.

We stratified our cohort in relation to IDH1 status. In case of wild-type IDH1, PFS by older patients was significantly lower according to Cox regression: HR = 1.031 per year of life (CI95% 1.000–1.063; p = 0.05). The significance level in the linear regression was not reached: the trend was PFS reduction for 7 days (0.24 months) per year of life:

$$d{\text{PFS}} = - 0.24\,\times\,{\text{Age}}$$
$$\left[ {{\text{change of PFS in months}} = - 0.24\,\left( {{\text{SE}} \pm 0.18} \right) \times {\text{age in years}}\; \left( {{\text{ANOVA p}} = 0.021,{\text{p}} = 0.2} \right)} \right]$$

If IDH1 mutation was present, we could not confirm the PFS association with age in Cox regression (HR = 1.010; CI95% 0.979–1.052; p – n.s.) or linear regression (p – n.s.).

OS was significantly poorer in older patients according to Cox regression: HR = 1.040 per year of life (CI95% 1.003–1.079; p = 0.033); in sub-group analysis considering IDH1 status, no significant dependencies were found (p – n.s.).

Discussion

Older patients with diffuse and anaplastic WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas had higher CE volume and more frequently harbored negative prognostic molecular markers like wild-type IDH. Although resection rate was similar, the residual CE volume was higher in older population. Overall, one year of patient’s life reduced the PFS by 9 days and OS was significantly decreased in relation to age. Moreover, in IDH sub-group analysis, age-dependent PFS reduction as well as higher CE rate in MRI was confirmed only in case of wild-type tumor.

Age is related with unfavorable neuropathological prognostic factors in case of LGG. The higher incidence of anaplasia in older patients results in worse PFS26,29. Patients with IDH wild-type and retained nuclear ATRX expression are significantly older, which is concordant and well-known according to the literature30,31,32,33 and this neuropathological profile is associated with aggressive behavior34,35,36,37,38. Similar findings were reported for glioblastoma, where older patients showed less frequently IDH mutation and consequently worse clinical outcome39,40. Moreover, this data is concordant to the fact, that patients with IDH wild-type LGG have an increased risk of malignant transformation41,42.

Positive CE in MRI is usually interpreted as prognostically unfavorable feature43,44. We showed, that age-dependent higher CE rates occur only in case of IDH wild-type glioma: that is a further evidence of the added aggressiveness of these tumors in older population. Thus, it is possible, that the relationship between age and CE is driven by the underlying relationship between age and IDH status.

If a patient was eligible for surgery, it was possible to provide the same extent of resection independently from age. Perioperative complication rates did not differ within elderly people as reported before45. Thus, neuro-oncological surgeons should aim for a radical resection for these patients as well9, as it provides more beneficial outcome according the actual guidelines9,10 and comparative studies46. However, the hypothesis that older patients with LGG are undertreated has already been suggested in other studies47. According to routine clinical standards, patients are not undertreated in our institution only due to their higher age.

The prognostic unfavorable molecular features consequently led to decreased PFS. We were able to show a predictable association between age and PFS, which could be a great help for physicians in estimating of the expectancies and in treatment suggesting: according to our data one year of life shortens the PFS by 9 days. Thus, a patient with 40 years of age had one year more calculated PFS compared to a patient twice that age. Furthermore, this association was present only in case of IDH wild-type gliomas according to sub-group analysis. Thus, even if there is dependency between older age and less favorable molecular characteristics, older age still imparts a poor prognosis in the IDH wild-type population. The worse PFS corresponded to a significantly worse OS of the older patients as well.

Our study has limitations. The survival endpoints were not reached for all patients, which could limit Cox regression analysis of OS in IDH sub-groups. We did not consider the pre-existing diseases, which were not recorded in our prospective database and could not be gained retrospectively keeping acceptable quality of data. However, patients were processed in our study only if they underwent substantial resection. That includes only patients who were eligible for intracranial surgery with or without general anesthesia. Thus, critically ill patients were indirectly excluded and did not influence our results. The sub-group analysis was restricted in our study due to limited number of cases. Survival analysis requires external validation.

Conclusions

Age truly matters in LGG. Distinct tumor features like wild-type IDH, malignant behavior and dismal prognosis were more unfavorable in older population, even if the extent of resection was similar. We were able to compute a PFS reduction for 9 days with each year of patient’s life. However, greater age imparted a poorer PFS and higher CE rate only in the IDH wild-type population. That needs to be evaluated in a large prospective cohort.