Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

pH-controlled synthesis of sustainable lauric acid/SiO2 phase change material for scalable thermal energy storage


Lauric acid (LA) has been recommended as economic, eco-friendly, and commercially viable materials to be used as phase change materials (PCMs). Nevertheless, there is lack of optimized parameters to produce microencapsulated PCMs with good performance. In this study, different amounts of LA have been chosen as core materials while tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the precursor solution to form silicon dioxide (SiO2) shell. The pH of precursor solution was kept at 2.5 for all composition of microencapsulated LA. The synthesized microencapsulated LA/SiO2 has been characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SEM and TEM confirm the microencapsulation of LA with SiO2. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed better thermal stability of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 compared to pure LA. PCM with 50% LA i.e. LAPC-6 exhibited the highest encapsulation efficiency (96.50%) and encapsulation ratio (96.15%) through Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) as well as good thermal reliability even after 30th cycle of heating and cooling process.


It is a great concern of the scientific community about the rising trend of the world’s energy consumption. Global energy demand is increasing rapidly, and fossil fuels consumption leads to higher greenhouse gas emission especially carbon dioxide (CO2), which will cause impacts on climate change, acid rain and human health1. International Energy Agency (IEA) report on World Energy Outlook 2019 estimates that the world energy demand will rise by 1.0% annually starting from 2018 to 20402. Therefore, the research on energy storage has attracted significant attention for its effective use, storage and planning3,4. In recent years, thermal energy storage (TES) technology has aroused considerable concern about fuel energy shortages and environmental pollution5. Latent heat storage systems are considered as one of the most promising thermal energy technology, which relies on the absorption and release of energy of PCMs6. In other words, good thermal efficiency, and large storage capacity during the melting and solidifying process of PCMs will make them an efficient material in solar and industrial waste energy application7,8,9,10.

PCMs are commonly known as solid–solid and solid–liquid where they undergo phase transformation by turning their physical characteristics into solid or liquid11. Layered perovskites, dihydric phosphate salts, ammonium thiocyanate, polyatomic alcohol and polyurethane-based co-polymers are examples of the solid–solid PCMs12. Apart from that, the most common is solid–liquid PCMs which are classified into three different categories such as organic materials (paraffin and fatty acid), inorganic salts and metals/metallic alloys13,14,15. Organic PCMs i.e. paraffin and fatty acid have gained significant attention owing to their high storage capacity, excellent chemical stability and low cost16,17. Fatty acid-based PCMs can be used in TES applications attributed to their high latent heat, good thermal stability, chemical durability, non-corrosive, non-toxic and easy availability12.

However, fatty acids cannot be used directly as PCMs owing to leakage issues during phase transformation from solid to liquid i.e. melting which contaminate and pollute the external environment18. Moreover, fatty acid PCMs cannot be used directly as construction building materials (CBMs) owing to their high super-cooling and low thermal conductivity issues. During phase transformation (solid to liquid), the melted PCMs may react with the external environment of cement matrix in CBMs resulting in the initiation of corrosion on steel rebar and strength reduction, thereby serviceability of the building reduces19. Therefore, the microencapsulation techniques have been considered as a suitable solution to overcome the aforementioned issues. The microencapsulation techniques control the shifting rate of heat and decrease the reactivity of the PCMs with other materials20. There have been various encapsulation methods studied by researchers such as complex coacervation21, interfacial polycondensation22,23, in-situ polymerization24,25 and sol–gel process26,27,28,29. However, sol–gel is a suitable method for the microencapsulation of PCMs owing to its simple operation under low-temperature condition30,31.

Moreover, a significant volume of research works has been focused on the synthesis and characterizations of microencapsulated PCMs using various types of shell/encapsulation materials such as silicon dioxide32,33, polystyrene34, melamine–formaldehyde35, urea–formaldehyde36, polymethyl methacrylate37, polycarbonate38, styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer39, and rigid polyurethane40. Fang et al.41 have synthesized flame retardant n-hexadecane with SiO2 shell through sol–gel method where they have maintained the pH of precursor solution at 2–3 by adding hydrochloric acid. In other studies, authors have synthesized the palmitic acid-based PCMs through sol–gel process where encapsulation was carried out by controlling the pH of precursor solution42. Li et al. have produced a stable paraffin/silicon dioxide/expanded graphite composite PCMs through sol–gel process maintaining a pH value of 243. In an another study, Zhang et al.23 have synthesized PCMs via sol–gel process with n-octadecane as core material and SiO2 as the shell material keeping a pH at 2–2.5.

From the literature search, it is found that the pH of the precursor solution is an important parameter to produce microencapsulated PCMs. Therefore, in the present study different amounts of core material i.e., LA has been taken to synthesize the microencapsulated PCMs by maintaining the 2.5 pH of the precursor solution using hydrochloric acid. Besides, it is very important to understand the actual mechanism involving in the formation of microencapsulated PCMs through sol–gel method. Lauric acid (LA) has been chosen as the core materials whereas tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the encapsulation material i.e., precursor solution. The characterization of the synthesized microencapsulated PCMs have been carried by Fourier transformed-infrared (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) while thermal properties by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).

Materials and methods


Lauric acid (LA, C12H24O2), sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS, NaC12H25SO4), ethyl alcohol (EA, C2H5OH) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were purchased from Daejung Chemical and Metals Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, South Korea while Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, C8H20O4Si) from Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium. The melting point and purity of LA were 44.46 °C and 99%, respectively. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, C8H20O4Si) acted as the precursor of encapsulating material for LA. The sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS, NaC12H25SO4) was used as an anionic surfactant. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) was used as the activator and ethyl alcohol (EA, C2H5OH) as the solvent.

Procedure for microencapsulation of LA

The microencapsulation of LA was carried out in two steps. The first step was the preparation of precursor solution which includes hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS. The second step was the preparation of emulsion solution for the encapsulation process.

Preparation of precursor solution

The precursor solution was prepared by mixing 10 ml TEOS, 10 ml EA and 20 ml distilled water in a beaker as shown in Table 1. The pH of this solution was reduced from 6.5 to 2.5 using HCl. Once the pH of precursor solution was attained up to 2.5, the solution was stirred at 400 rpm and 50 °C for 30 min until a transparent solution of TEOS was obtained. This step is called hydrolysis of TEOS, which is amphiphilic in nature and favourable to encapsulate the LA44.

Table 1 Details composition for microencapsulation of LA.

Preparation of LA emulsion

Different amounts of LA i.e., 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 50 g were taken as PCMs as shown in Table 1. These amounts of LA were mixed with different amounts of SLS in 100 ml distilled water (Table 1) under vigorous agitation using a mechanical stirrer at 600 rpm and 65 °C for 2 h. The pH of the emulsion solution was measured and found to be 4–4.5.

Microencapsulation of LA

The microencapsulation of LA was carried out through sol–gel process. The hydrolysed TEOS precursor solution was added dropwise into the LA emulsion and stirred vigorously at 800 rpm and 65 °C for 6 h. The resultant solution i.e., emulsion + precursor was kept for cooling, and then, was filtered followed by ringing with alcohol to remove excess fatty acid. Finally, the residue was oven-dried at 40 °C for 24 h.

The mechanism for the microencapsulation of LA is described in Fig. 1. The precursor solution i.e. TEOS would start to hydrolyse in the presence of acid solution and form orthosilicic acid (Si(OH)4). At the long term of stirring, further condensation reaction would occur. Alternatively, on another side, LA started to interact with SLS in an aqueous solution where SLS acted as an anionic surfactant carrying negatively charged ions. To form a stable emulsion solution, the hydrophilic head of the SLS molecules attach with the water molecules whereas the hydrophobic tails attach to the inner part of LA and separate away from water molecules. Thereafter the hydrolysed silica-sol solution was slowly added to the LA emulsion solution where the hydrophilic ends of hydrolysed silica slowly diffused and condensed onto the surface of LA. In the final step, polymerization reaction would take place resulting in microencapsulation of LA with SiO2.

Figure 1

Schematic of the formation of microencapsulated LA with SiO2 shell.


FT-IR spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer UATR Two, United States of America) was used to analyse the chemical composition of pure LA as well as microencapsulated LA. The spectra were recorded ranging from 500 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1.

The XRD (D/MAX-2500, Rigaku, Japan) measurements were performed to analyse the phases present in the samples using 1.541 Å Cu-Kα radiation with 0.02° step width on continuous scanning mode. The XRD patterns were collected from 2θ = 5°–50° at 4°/min scan rate using 25 kV and 100 mA operating conditions.

The chemical states of the present element in the samples were analysed by XPS (Scienta Omicron R300, United States of America) with Al Kα X-ray as the source of radiation. All the collected XPS spectra were calibrated with the adventitious carbon (C1s) peak (peak position: 284.6 eV). CASA XPS software was used to calibrate and deconvolute the scans as well as to correct the background (Shirley method) of the XPS peak. The best peak fittings were achieved by suitable Gaussian/Lorentzian fit.

The morphology and chemical compositions of the samples were investigated by SEM (TESCAN MIRA3, Czech Republic) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer at 15 kV as well as TEM (JEOL, JEM 2010, Tokyo, Japan).

Thermal properties (melting/solidifying temperature and latent heat) and thermal stability (thermal cycle) of the microencapsulated PCMs were investigated by DSC (TA Instrument, Discovery DSC, New Castle, United States of America) instrument from 20 °C and 60 °C with a 10 °C/min heating/cooling rate. The weight loss of the samples was investigated by a TGA analyser (TA Instrument, Discovery TGA, New Castle, United States of America) at 10 °C/min heating rate starting from 20 to 650 °C.

Results and discussion

FT-IR analysis

The FT-IR analysis of bulk LA as well as microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are shown in Fig. 2. The bulk/pure LA has been chosen as reference materials. The FT-IR of pure LA shows four major peaks at 2914, 2847, 1696 and 937 cm−1 while two minor peaks at 1302 and 726 cm−1 as shown in Fig. 2a. The peaks at 2914 and 2847 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibration of –CH3 and –CH2 group, respectively45. Alternatively, one intense peak at 1696 cm−1 exhibits the symmetrical C=O stretching vibration in LA46 while another peak at 937 cm−1 reveals the out of plane bending vibration for –OH group45. Moreover, two weak peaks appeared at 1302 cm−1 and 726 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching vibration of O–C group and plane bending vibration of C–H bond47. These peaks i.e., 2914, 2847, 1696, 1302, 937 and 726 cm−1 are also found in microencapsulated LA with SiO2 (Fig. 2b–g).

Figure 2

FT-IR spectra of (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1, (c) LAPC-2, (d) LAPC-3, (e) LAPC-4, (f) LAPC-5 and (g) LAPC-6.

An interesting observation can be found in microencapsulated LA/SiO2 where one absorption peak at 1080 cm−1 is observed which corresponds to the asymmetric stretching vibration band of the Si–O–Si shell23. It depicts that the formation of SiO2 has occurred during the encapsulation of LA. Our finding is well corroborated with Zhang et al.45 works where the PCMs was encapsulated by a facile one-pot method with co-hydrolysis and co-condensation process of methyl-triethoxysilane (MTES).

The main absorption peak of SiO2 at 1080 cm−1 in lower core–shell ratio i.e., LAPC-1 (Fig. 2b) and LAPC-2 (Fig. 2c) is found to be highest in intensity and broadening revealing the thick and high amount of SiO2 compared to other samples. As the core–shell ratio is increased, the intensity of SiO2 absorption band is decreased confirming the thinning and lowering in amount of SiO2 formed onto the LA surfaces. Initially, the pH of the emulsion solution is found to be in between 4 to 4.5. However, once the precursor solution is mixed with the emulsion solution, the polymerisation would occur (Fig. 1) resulting in encapsulation of LA with SiO2 shell48. The slow condensation rate of SiO2 forms smooth and more compact layers onto the LA surface attributed to the sufficient time i.e., 6 h given for the reaction. Consequently, the low core–shell ratio might exhibit thicker shell formation compared to the higher core–shell ratio.

XRD analysis

The XRD results of pure LA powder and microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are shown in Fig. 3. The major XRD peaks of LA are found at 2θ = 6.461° (200), 9.699° (300), 16.199° (500), 20.381° (\(\overline{3}\)10), 21.52° (211), 23.98° (402), 30.121° (412) and 40.182° (304) which are well-matched with JCPDS No.: 038-1976 (C2H24O2, Lauric acid). These peaks are also found in the microencapsulated LA/SiO2 samples. Apart from these peaks, there are other peaks observed at 2θ = 19.22° (\(\overline{1}\)07), 19.86° (\(\overline{2}\)07), 23.421° (\(\overline{4}\)11) and 24.401° (600) correspond to LA (JCPDS No.: 008-0664). These peaks are well corroborated with Zhang et al. work where they have successfully synthesized microencapsulated n-octadecane with silica shell at pH 2–2.523.

Figure 3

XRD patterns of (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1, (c) LAPC-2, (d) LAPC-3, (e) LAPC-4, (f) LAPC-5 and (g) LAPC-6.

Broadening in XRD peaks of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are observed attributed to the microencapsulation of core material i.e., LA with amorphous SiO2 shell around 2θ = 20°–30° as shown in supplementary Fig. S1. It can be seen from Fig. S1 that as the core material amount is increased (Fig. S1b–g), amorphousity is decreased attributed either to the thinning of shell wall or decrease in the amount of SiO2 onto the microencapsulated LA/SiO2 surfaces. Moreover, there is an interesting observation found in XRD peaks at (200), (300) and (500) where the intensity ratio of these peaks are increased as the core material is increased revealing the high amount of core materials in microencapsulated LA/SiO2.

It is observed by Wu et al. that the condensation rate is at its lowest point when the pH of the silica precursor is below 2.0 (isoelectric point) attributed to the neutral zeta (ζ) potential or zero surface charge49. At the neutral charge, the particles of the precursor solution tend to agglomerate, aggregate and flocculate. Thus, it is necessary to increase the pH of the precursor solution (pH > 2.0) to keep a stable solution with a good dispersion particle. In another study, pH at 2 is not recommended as the solution is prone to aggregate and flocculate43. For pH values above isoelectric point, the ζ potential values of silica become more negative50. Thus, it is suggested to keep the precursor solution pH greater than 2 where the charged particles are repelled to each other and avoid the agglomeration caused by the Van der Waals forces48 result in formation of uniform and compact layer of SiO2 on the surface of LA49,51,52,53.

XPS analysis

The XPS survey scan of the LA, LAPC-1 and LAPC-6 samples are shown in Fig. 4. It reveals the presence of C 1 s and O 1 s in all samples as well as two other peaks of Si 2 s and Si 2p in LAPC-1 and LAPC-6 samples attributed to the microencapsulation of LA with SiO2 shell, which also corroborates with FT-IR and XRD results. The deconvolution of C 1 s, O 1 s and Si 2p are shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7, respectively.

Figure 4

XPS survey scan of (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1 and (c) LAPC-6.

Figure 5

XPS spectra of C 1 s for (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1 and (c) LAPC-6.

Figure 6

XPS spectra of O 1 s for (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1 and (c) LAPC-6.

Figure 7

XPS spectra of Si 2p for (a) LAPC-1 and (b) LAPC-6.

The XPS spectra of C 1 s (Fig. 5) are fitted with three different peaks which are C–C, C=O and O=C=O for all samples (LA, LAPC-1, and LAPC-6) which are attributed to the core material. The binding energy (BE) of C–C, C=O and O=C=O peaks in the present study are well corroborated with other researchers works54,55,56.

Figure 6 shows the XPS spectra of O 1 s with the presence of two peaks (Fig. 6a) of C–O–H (533.5 eV) and C–O/C=O (532.1 eV) for bulk LA whereas LAPC-1 (Fig. 6b) exhibits at 0.1 eV higher BE of C–O–H and C–O/C=O peaks attributed the adsorption of SiO2 onto the LA surface. There is broadening in C–O/C=O peaks observed for LAPC-1 (Fig. 6b) and LAPC-6 (Fig. 6c) attributed to the change in the chemical moiety owing to the presence of SiO2. The BE of these peaks are well fitted and satisfied with the earlier studies54,57,58.

Figure 7 shows the XPS spectra of Si 2p associated with the encapsulation of SiO2 onto the LA surface. No peak of Si 2p is found in bulk LA owing to the absence of SiO2. The Si 2p peak is fitted with Si–O–Si and Si–OH in microencapsulated LA/SiO2 samples. Both samples exhibited similar binding energy at 105.5 eV for Si–O–Si peak whereas Si–OH peak exhibits at 103.3 eV (Fig. 7a) and 103.0 eV (Fig. 7b) for LAPC-1 and LAPC-6, respectively. The intensity of Si–OH peak is higher in LAPC-1 compared to LAPC-6 owing to the formation of a thicker SiO2 wall.

Morphology of the microencapsulated LA/SiO2

The morphology of LA and microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen from Fig. 8a that LA exhibits irregular morphology with a rough surface. The particle of LA is around 200 µm in diameter and 500 µm in length. However, once the encapsulation has occurred, the morphology of the encapsulated PCMs has changed as shown in Fig. 8b–g.

Figure 8

SEM of (a) LA, (b) LAPC-1, (c) LAPC-2, (d) LAPC-3, (e) LAPC-4, (f) LAPC-5 and (g) LAPC-6.

The morphology of LAPC-1 sample exhibited a dense structure of SiO2 (Fig. 8b) where the proper encapsulation cannot be identified43. It can be seen that at low amount of core material, the surface is more pronounced to form dense and agglomerated (Fig. 8b–d) structure59 owing to the significant amount of amorphous SiO2 which cover the LA surface60. The encapsulation of SiO2 on high amount of core materials i.e. LA leads to reduce the agglomeration38. The morphology of LAPC-4 (Fig. 8e) and LAPC-5 (Fig. 8f) samples are getting clear with the formation of globular particles even though the agglomerated structure still can be seen (Fig. 8e,f)43,61,62. Once the amount of core materials i.e. LA is reached up to 50% i.e., LAPC-6, the SEM image has shown more globular and well-defined structure47 (Fig. 8g inset). This result is well corroborated with TEM (Fig. 9) where light white colour SiO2 shell covered the core LA (black) uniformly. It can be seen from this Fig. that different globular microencapsulated LA/SiO2 particles are attached with each other (Fig. 8g). It can be explained that a high amount of LA reduces the number of Si–O–Si bonds by replacing Si–OH with Si–CH3 groups which decrease the connectivity of SiO2 network and make less porous structure63. Once the amount of LA increases i.e., high surface area, only a few silica oligomers will deposit on the LA surface and led to increase the particle size of microencapsulated LA/SiO2. It can be seen from Fig. 8g that the particle size of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 is greater than 150 µm which is well corroborated with particles size measured by TEM. The condensation rate of SiO2 is low in an acidic environment where it has significant time to encapsulate the LA23. At the low pH value, the self-assembly of SiO2 particles occurs owing to the condensation of silanol. Thus, smooth and compact morphology is observed which provides mechanical strength to the PCMs and prevent the leakage at higher temperature64. It is observed by Li et al. that if the pH of precursor solution is less than isoelectric point i.e., 2, then the surface of encapsulated PCMs become rough and porous43.

Figure 9

TEM of LAPC-6.

The EDS analysis of LA and microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are shown in Table 2. LA sample exhibited C and O attributed to the hydrocarbon. However, microencapsulated LA/SiO2 contain C and O as well as different content of Si. At low core material amount, Si is highest but once the amount is increased, Si content is decreased, and C is increased. This result suggests that at the low amount of core material, the formation of Si is thicker whereas, at high amount of core material, the thinning of SiO2 is occurred. Therefore, well-defined microencapsulation is observed in LAPC-6 sample (Figs. 8g, 9). There is no consistency in the amount of C and O due to the semi-quantitative analysis of EDS65. The presence of Si in the microencapsulated LA/SiO2 is well corroborated with the results of FT-IR, XRD and XPS where SiO2 is observed.

Table 2 EDS result of LA and microencapsulated LA.

Thermal performance of the microencapsulated LA with SiO2 shell

Melting and solidifying characteristics of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are shown in Figs. 10 and 11, respectively, as well as the corresponding thermal data have been presented in Table 3. It can be seen from melting (Fig. 10) and solidifying (Fig. 11) curves that all samples exhibit different endothermic and exothermic peak temperatures. LA sample shows the highest melting i.e., 44.459 °C (Fig. 10; Table 3) and solidifying temperature i.e., 38.487 °C (Fig. 11; Table 3) as well as 166.74 J/g melting latent heat and 159.54 J/g solidifying latent heat (Table 3). This result suggests that the latent heat of LA is high, thus, it can be considered as prudent PCMs for the application in thermal storage62. When the amount of core material is less, the melting and solidifying temperatures, as well as the corresponding latent heat values are lower compared to LA attributed either to the lowest amount of LA where shell i.e., SiO2 act as an inert material or thickening of the shell wall. In this case, the movement of the LA molecules are limited and confined to a limited space by the shell38,66,67,68 or there is a possibility that microencapsulated LA/SiO2 have many empty shells without core materials69. The core material is responsible for the storage and release of thermal energy rather than shell materials. However, once the core material i.e., LA is increased, the melting and solidifying temperatures as well as the corresponding latent heat values are increased near to the value of bulk LA. LAPC-6 sample exhibited the highest melting temperature (44.295 °C) and latent heat of melting (160.91 J/g) as well as solidifying temperature (39.009 °C) and latent heat of solidification (152.82 J/g) among all microencapsulated LA/SiO2 where core material promotes the formation of thin SiO2 layer. This result is suggesting that microencapsulated LA/SiO2 can absorb/release the thermal energy during melting/solidifying process, thus, act as high latent heat storage material59. However, it can be seen that the melting and solidifying temperatures and latent heats of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 are lower than LA ascribing the weak interaction between the LA molecules and the inner surface wall of SiO2 shell70. The 6–7 °C lowering in melting and solidifying temperatures of LAPC-6 compared to LA (without encapsulation) suggesting that there is no strong interaction between LA and wall of the SiO2 shell, that results as the depression in phase change temperature of PCMs71.

Figure 10

Melting curves of LA and microencapsulated LA/SiO2.

Figure 11

Solidifying curves of LA and microencapsulated LA/SiO2.

Table 3 DSC of LA and microencapsulated LA/SiO2.

The microencapsulation ratio (R%) and efficiency (E%) of LA/SiO2 can be derived by following equations23:

$$ {\text{R}}\% = \frac{{\Delta {\text{H}}_{{\text{MEPCM, m}}} }}{{\Delta {\text{H}}_{{\text{PCM, m}}} }} \times 100 $$
$$ {\text{E}}\% = \frac{{\Delta H_{{\text{MEPCM, m}}} + \Delta H_{{\text{MEPCM, s}}} }}{{\Delta H_{{\text{PCM, m}}} + \Delta H_{{\text{PCM, s}}} }} \times 100 $$

where, ΔHMEPCM,m and ΔHPCM,m are the melting latent heat of the microencapsulated LA/SiO2 and LA while ΔHMEPCM,s and ΔHPCM,s is the solidifying latent heat of the microencapsulated LA/SiO2 and LA, respectively. Table 3 shows that LAPC-6 sample exhibited 96.50% encapsulation ratio and 96.15% encapsulation efficiency which are the highest among all microencapsulated LA/SiO2. The comparison in the encapsulation ratio and efficiency of the PCMs with the recent reported studies72,73,74,75 are presented in Table 4. It can be seen from this table that LAPC-6 has exhibited the highest encapsulation ratio and efficiency than earlier reported values.

Table 4 Comparison of the encapsulation ratio and efficiency with previous studies.

Thermal stability and reliability of the microencapsulated LA/SiO2

The thermal stability of PCMs is an important parameter for their application in real practices. The TGA of LA, LAPC-1 and LAPC-6 are shown in Fig. 12. LA sample shows a straight and smooth line up to 116 °C thereafter decomposition has started. Up to 99.65% weight loss has occurred at 220 °C for pure LA. However, LAPC-1 and LAPC-6 samples have started to decompose at 184 °C and maximum decomposition is found to be 54.82% and 82.80% around 288 °C, respectively. The decompositions of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 i.e., LAPC-1 and LAPC-6 have occurred via two steps. The first step from 184 to 288 °C is caused by mass loss of LA while the second step from 300 to 650 °C is attributed to the further condensation of silanol groups62,67,76,77. The decomposition of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 exhibit high decomposition/onset temperature and lower weight loss compared to LA. It suggests that SiO2 shell hinders or delays the decomposition and resulting in the high thermal stability of LA69. The weight loss of LAPC-6 sample is greater than LAPC-1 suggesting that the decomposition and weight loss mainly caused by the evaporation of LA61. Alternatively, in the case of LAPC-1, thick layer (Fig. 8b) and high content (Table 2) of SiO2 hinder the degradation process, thus, lower weight loss is observed. The carbonaceous-silicate charred layer was formed onto the LA surface which can protect the core materials and slow down the volatile products transferred during the thermal decomposition64.

Figure 12

TGA curves of bulk LA and microencapsulated LA.

The other important parameter of the microencapsulated PCMs is the thermal reliability and consistency after being used for a certain period of time. There should be no significant difference in the thermal properties and stability after a certain duration that can affect the phase change temperature and latent heat capacity. Therefore, Fig. 13 shows the thermal reliability of LA and LAPC-6 after 30 cycles of heating and cooling process. The LA (without encapsulation) exhibits the melting and solidifying temperatures from 44.459 °C to 45.845 °C and 38.482 °C to 37.695 °C while latent heat changes from 166.74 J/g to 165.06 J/g and 159.54 J/g to 158.16 J/g from 1 to 30 cycles as shown in Fig. 13a, respectively. The melting and solidifying temperatures and latent heats of LA have decreased significantly. LAPC-6 sample shows the melting and solidifying temperatures change from 44.221 °C to 44.116 °C and 39.445 °C to 39.317 °C while the latent heat from 160.96 J/g to 160.75 J/g and 152.80 J/g to 152.71 J/g as shown in Fig. 13b, respectively. Negligible changes observed in melting and solidifying temperature and latent heat of LAPC-6 after 30 thermal cycles. Therefore, the microencapsulation of SiO2 is proven to be advantageous and it helps to sustain the thermal characteristic of the PCMs after a long period of application.

Figure 13

Thermal cycles of (a) LA and (b) LAPC-6 at 1st and 30th cycles of heating and cooling.


In this study, LA has been chosen for microencapsulation with SiO2 shell. The microencapsulation of LA with SiO2 shell has been achieved successfully via sol–gel method using TEOS as precursor solution at 2.5 pH. Various kinds of analyses were conducted viz. FT-IR, XRD, XPS, SEM, TEM, DSC, and TGA to determine the properties of the microencapsulated LA/SiO2. FT-IR analysis has exhibited the presence of Si–O–Si peak at 1080 cm−1 for all microencapsulated LA while XRD analysis has shown the formation of hump at 2θ = 20°–30° associated with the amorphous SiO2 shell. XPS analysis of microencapsulated samples has shown the Si–O–Si and Si–OH peaks. SEM and TEM images of LAPC-6 has shown the formation of the fine-globular shape of microencapsulated LA/SiO2 whereas the samples with low amount of LA have exhibited the agglomeration. TEM analysis has shown that the particle size of LAPC-6 is found to be around 160 µm. LAPC-6 has exhibited the highest encapsulation efficiency and ratio among all microencapsulated LA/SiO2 with good thermal reliability.


  1. 1.

    Jeon, J., Lee, J.-H., Seo, J., Jeong, S.-G. & Kim, S. Application of PCM thermal energy storage system to reduce building energy consumption. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 111, 279–288 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    IEA. World Energy Outlook (IEA, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sharma, A., Tyagi, V. V., Chen, C. & Buddhi, D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 318–345 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sarı, A., Alkan, C. & Karaipekli, A. Preparation, characterization and thermal properties of PMMA/n-heptadecane microcapsules as novel solid–liquid microPCM for thermal energy storage. Appl. Energy 87, 1529–1534 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yan, T., Wang, C. & Li, D. Performance analysis of a solid–gas thermochemical composite sorption system for thermal energy storage and energy upgrade. Appl. Therm. Eng. 150, 512–521 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z., Zuo, J., Huang, K. & Zhang, L. Phase change materials for solar thermal energy storage in residential buildings in cold climate. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 48, 692–703 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tyagi, V. V. & Buddhi, D. PCM thermal storage in buildings: A state of art. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 1146–1166 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hasnain, S. Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, Part I: Heat storage materials and techniques. Energy Convers. Manag. 39, 1127–1138 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Farid, M. M., Khudhair, A. M., Razack, S. A. K. & Al-Hallaj, S. A review on phase change energy storage: Materials and applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 45, 1597–1615 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zalba, B., Marın, J. M., Cabeza, L. F. & Mehling, H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: Materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 23, 251–283 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kumar, N. In Handbook of Thermal Science and Engineering (ed. Kulacki, F.) 2213–2275 (Springer, 2018).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pielichowska, K. & Pielichowski, K. Phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Prog. Mater. Sci. 65, 67–123 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raj, V. A. A. & Velraj, R. Review on free cooling of buildings using phase change materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 2819–2829 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cárdenas, B. & León, N. High temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: Phase change materials, design considerations and performance enhancement techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 27, 724–737 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhao, C., Lu, W. & Tian, Y. Heat transfer enhancement for thermal energy storage using metal foams embedded within phase change materials (PCMs). Sol. Energy 84, 1402–1412 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tang, X. et al. Shape-stabilized phase change materials based on fatty acid eutectics/expanded graphite composites for thermal storage. Energy Build. 109, 353–360 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yuan, Y., Zhang, N., Tao, W., Cao, X. & He, Y. Fatty acids as phase change materials: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 482–498 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Döğüşcü, D. K., Kızıl, Ç., Biçer, A., Sarı, A. & Alkan, C. Microencapsulated n-alkane eutectics in polystyrene for solar thermal applications. Sol. Energy 160, 32–42 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cabeza, L., Roca, J., Noguees, M., Mehling, H. & Hiebler, S. Long term immersion corrosion tests on metal-PCM pairs used for latent heat storage in the 24 to 29 °C temperature range. Mater. Corros. 56, 33–39 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fang, G., Chen, Z. & Li, H. Synthesis and properties of microencapsulated paraffin composites with SiO2 shell as thermal energy storage materials. Chem. Eng. J. 163, 154–159 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rong, Y., Chen, H.-Z., Wei, D.-C., Sun, J.-Z. & Wang, M. Microcapsules with compact membrane structure from gelatin and styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer by complex coacervation. Colloids Surf. A 242, 17–20 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hong, K. & Park, S. Preparation of polyurea microcapsules with different composition ratios: Structures and thermal properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 272, 418–421 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang, H., Wang, X. & Wu, D. Silica encapsulation of n-octadecane via sol–gel process: A novel microencapsulated phase-change material with enhanced thermal conductivity and performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 343, 246–255 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cho, J.-S., Kwon, A. & Cho, C.-G. Microencapsulation of octadecane as a phase-change material by interfacial polymerization in an emulsion system. Colloid Polym. Sci. 280, 260–266 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pascu, O., Garcia-Valls, R. & Giamberini, M. Interfacial polymerization of an epoxy resin and carboxylic acids for the synthesis of microcapsules. Polym. Int. 57, 995–1006 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cao, L., Tang, F. & Fang, G. Synthesis and characterization of microencapsulated paraffin with titanium dioxide shell as shape-stabilized thermal energy storage materials in buildings. Energy Build. 72, 31–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pan, W., Ye, J., Ning, G., Lin, Y. & Wang, J. A novel synthesis of micrometer silica hollow sphere. Mater. Res. Bull. 44, 280–283 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, H., Wu, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, D. & Qi, L. Facile synthesis of monodisperse microspheres and gigantic hollow shells of mesoporous silica in mixed water–ethanol solvents. Langmuir 23, 1107–1113 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Deng, Z., Chen, M., Zhou, S., You, B. & Wu, L. A novel method for the fabrication of monodisperse hollow silica spheres. Langmuir 22, 6403–6407 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, B., Liu, T., Hu, L., Wang, Y. & Gao, L. Fabrication and properties of microencapsulated paraffin@ SiO2 phase change composite for thermal energy storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1, 374–380 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ishak, S., Mandal, S., Lee, H.-S. & Singh, J. K. Microencapsulation of stearic acid with SiO2 shell as phase change material for potential energy storage. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–15 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ahn, B. Y., Seok, S. I., Baek, I. C. & Hong, S.-I. Core/shell silica-based in-situ microencapsulation: A self-templating method. Chem. Commun. 2, 189–190 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, H., Schaefer, K., Pich, A. & Moeller, M. Synthesis of silica encapsulated perylenetetracarboxylic diimide core–shell nanoellipsoids. Chem. Mater. 23, 4748–4755 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Borreguero, A. M., Carmona, M., Sanchez, M. L., Valverde, J. L. & Rodriguez, J. F. Improvement of the thermal behaviour of gypsum blocks by the incorporation of microcapsules containing PCMS obtained by suspension polymerization with an optimal core/coating mass ratio. Appl. Therm. Eng. 30, 1164–1169 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Su, J., Wang, L. & Ren, L. Fabrication and thermal properties of microPCMs: Used melamine-formaldehyde resin as shell material. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 101, 1522–1528 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hussain, S. I. & Kalaiselvam, S. Nanoencapsulation of oleic acid phase change material with Ag2O nanoparticles-based urea formaldehyde shell for building thermal energy storage. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 140, 133–147 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang, Y., Xia, T. D., Feng, H. X. & Zhang, H. Stearic acid/polymethylmethacrylate composite as form-stable phase change materials for latent heat thermal energy storage. Renew. Energy 36, 1814–1820 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang, H. & Wang, X. Fabrication and performances of microencapsulated phase change materials based on n-octadecane core and resorcinol-modified melamine–formaldehyde shell. Colloids Surf. A 332, 129–138 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sánchez-Silva, L. et al. Microencapsulation of PCMs with a styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer shell by suspension-like polymerisation. Chem. Eng. J. 157, 216–222 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Borreguero, A. M. et al. Characterization of rigid polyurethane foams containing microencapsulated Rubitherm® RT27: Catalyst effect. Part II. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 347–356 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fang, G., Li, H., Chen, Z. & Liu, X. Preparation and characterization of flame retardant n-hexadecane/silicon dioxide composites as thermal energy storage materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 181, 1004–1009 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fang, G., Li, H., Chen, Z. & Liu, X. Preparation and properties of palmitic acid/SiO2 composites with flame retardant as thermal energy storage materials. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 1875–1881 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li, M., Wu, Z. & Tan, J. Properties of form-stable paraffin/silicon dioxide/expanded graphite phase change composites prepared by sol–gel method. Appl. Energy 92, 456–461 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jiang, M., Song, X., Ye, G. & Xu, J. Preparation of PVA/paraffin thermal regulating fiber by in situ microencapsulation. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2231–2237 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Li, X. & Wu, X. Preparation of hydrophobic lauric acid/SiO2 shape-stabilized phase change materials for thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage 21, 611–617 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shifu, W., Jinguang, W. & Guangxian, X. in 7th International Conference on Fourier Transform Spectroscopy 340–341 (International Society for Optics and Photonics).

  47. 47.

    Yanghua, C., Yuan, L. & Zhaohe, W. Preparation and characteristics of microencapsulated lauric acid as composite thermal energy storage materials. Mater. Sci. 26, 88–93 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ciriminna, R., Sciortino, M., Alonzo, G., Schrijver, A. D. & Pagliaro, M. From molecules to systems: Sol–gel microencapsulation in silica-based materials. Chem. Rev. 111, 765–789 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wu, S.-H., Mou, C.-Y. & Lin, H.-P. Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3862–3875 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zheng, K. et al. Electron-beam-assisted superplastic shaping of nanoscale amorphous silica. Nat. Commun. 1, 1–8 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Júnior, J. A. A. & Baldo, J. B. The behavior of zeta potential of silica suspensions. N. J. Glass Ceramics 4, 29 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hunter, J. Everything You Want to Know about Coagulation and Floculation and Zeta Meter 26–39 (Academic Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dove, P. Silica–water interface. Silica, Physical Behavior 259–308 (Geochemistry and Materials Applications. Mineralogical Society of America, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Post, P., Wurlitzer, L., Maus-Friedrichs, W. & Weber, A. P. Characterization and applications of nanoparticles modified in-flight with silica or silica-organic coatings. Nanomaterials 8, 530 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sonnenfeld, A. et al. Deposition process based on organosilicon precursors in dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure—A comparison. Plasmas Polym. 6, 237–266 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Martins, N. C. et al. N-doped carbon quantum dots/TiO2 composite with improved photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 193, 67–74 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rojas, J., Toro-Gonzalez, M., Molina-Higgins, M. & Castano, C. Facile radiolytic synthesis of ruthenium nanoparticles on graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 205, 28–35 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mandal, S. et al. Electrochemical behavior of Cu60Zr25Ti15 bulk metallic glass with the addition of Nb and Mo. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 6874–6884 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fang, G., Li, H. & Liu, X. Preparation and properties of lauric acid/silicon dioxide composites as form-stable phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Mater. Chem. Phys. 122, 533–536 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Urata, C., Aoyama, Y., Tonegawa, A., Yamauchi, Y. & Kuroda, K. Dialysis process for the removal of surfactants to form colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 34, 5094–5096 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Yuan, H. et al. Synthesis and characterization of stearic acid/silicon dioxide nanoencapsules for solar energy storage. Sol. Energy 173, 42–52 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Yuan, H. et al. Effect of alkaline pH on formation of lauric acid/SiO2 nanocapsules via sol-gel process for solar energy storage. Sol. Energy 185, 374–386 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Innocenzi, P., Abdirashid, M. & Guglielmi, M. Structure and properties of sol–gel coatings from methyltriethoxysilane and tetraethoxysilane. J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 3, 47–55 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Chen, Z., Cao, L., Shan, F. & Fang, G. Preparation and characteristics of microencapsulated stearic acid as composite thermal energy storage material in buildings. Energy Build. 62, 469–474 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhong-Qing, Z. et al. Fabrication and release behavior of nitrapyrin microcapsules: Using modified melamine-formaldehyde resin as shell material. Sci. Total Environ. 704, 135394 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    He, L. et al. Phase change characteristics of shape-stabilized PEG/SiO2 composites using calcium chloride-assisted and temperature-assisted sol gel methods. Sol. Energy 103, 448–455 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    He, F., Wang, X. & Wu, D. New approach for sol–gel synthesis of microencapsulated n-octadecane phase change material with silica wall using sodium silicate precursor. Energy 67, 223–233 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Zeng, J.-L. et al. Preparation, morphology and thermal properties of microencapsulated palmitic acid phase change material with polyaniline shells. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 129, 1583–1592 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yang, X. et al. Synthesis of high latent heat lauric acid/silica microcapsules by interfacial polymerization method for thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage 33, 102059 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Cai, Y. et al. Fabrication and characterization of capric–lauric–palmitic acid/electrospun SiO2 nanofibers composite as form-stable phase change material for thermal energy storage/retrieval. Sol. Energy 118, 87–95 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sarı, A. & Karaipekli, A. Preparation, thermal properties and thermal reliability of palmitic acid/expanded graphite composite as form-stable PCM for thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 571–576 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Parameshwaran, R., Naresh, R., Ram, V. V. & Srinivas, P. Microencapsulated bio-based phase change material-micro concrete composite for thermal energy storage. J. Build. Eng. 39, 102247 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sun, Z. et al. Development of poly (ethylene glycol)/silica phase-change microcapsules with well-defined core-shell structure for reliable and durable heat energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 225, 111069 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ji, W., Cheng, X., Chen, S., Wang, X. & Li, Y. Self-assembly fabrication of GO/TiO2@ paraffin microcapsules for enhancement of thermal energy storage. Powder Technol. 385, 546–556 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sarı, A., Saleh, T. A., Hekimoğlu, G., Tyagi, V. & Sharma, R. Microencapsulated heptadecane with calcium carbonate as thermal conductivity-enhanced phase change material for thermal energy storage. J. Mol. Liq. 328, 115508 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Tang, F., Liu, L., Alva, G., Jia, Y. & Fang, G. Synthesis and properties of microencapsulated octadecane with silica shell as shape-stabilized thermal energy storage materials. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 160, 1–6 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Liang, S. et al. Nanoencapsulation of n-octadecane phase change material with silica shell through interfacial hydrolysis and polycondensation in miniemulsion. Energy 93, 1684–1692 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2021) and basic science research program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (No. 2015R1A5A1037548).

Author information




S.I. and S.M. have performed the experiment. Work has been designed by H.S.L. and J.K.S. Analysis of the results have been performed by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Han-Seung Lee or Jitendra Kumar Singh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishak, S., Mandal, S., Lee, HS. et al. pH-controlled synthesis of sustainable lauric acid/SiO2 phase change material for scalable thermal energy storage. Sci Rep 11, 15012 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing