Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A transgenic female killing system for the genetic control of Drosophila suzukii

Abstract

The spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) is an invasive pest of soft-skinned fruit crops. It is rapidly transmitted in Europe and North America, causing widespread agricultural losses. Genetic control strategies such as the sterile insect technique (SIT) have been proposed as environment-friendly and species-restricted approaches for this pest. However, females are inefficient agents in SIT programs. Here we report a conditional female-killing (FK) strategy based on the tetracycline-off system. We assembled sixteen genetic constructs for testing in vitro and in vivo. Twenty-four independent transgenic strains of D. suzukii were generated and tested for female-specific lethality. The strongest FK effect in the absence of tetracycline was achieved by the construct containing D. suzukii nullo promoter for early gene expression, D. suzukii pro-apoptotic gene hidAla4 for lethality, and the transformer gene intron from the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata for female-specific splicing. One strain carrying this construct eliminated 100% of the female offspring during embryogenesis and produced only males. However, homozygous females from these FK strains were not viable on a tetracycline-supplemented diet, possibly due to the basal expression of hidAla4. Potential improvements to the gene constructs and the use of such FK strains in an SIT program are discussed.

Introduction

The spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii; Diptera, Drosophilidae) is an invasive pest that has recently emerged as a global threat to fruit production and trade1,2. D. suzukii is challenging to control with pesticides because the larvae burrow inside ripening fruit and are not affected by chemicals on the surface3,4. Alternative, environmentally sustainable control measures such as the sterile insect technique (SIT) have been proposed or investigated for this pest5,6. SIT involves the release of mass-produced radiation-sterilized insects into the designated area and works on the basis that mating between sterile males and wild, fertile females produces no offspring7,8. SIT has been used as an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) strategy globally to combat agricultural pests and human disease vectors9,10. However, females are inefficient SIT agents because they compete with wild females for sterile males, thus reducing the effectiveness of the strategy7,11. The Female-killing (FK) strategies using the binary tetracycline-off (Tet-off) system were first introduced in Drosophila melanogaster to eliminate females adults12,13. The transgenic sexing strains (TSSs) based on female-specific splicing were developed in different insect species. Most of the TSSs eliminated females at the pupal stage, supposedly due to a transcriptional squelching14,15. Since the rearing of females contributes significantly to the running costs of SIT programs16,17, transgenic embryonic sexing systems (TESS) have been established in several fruit fly species18,19,20 and livestock pests21,22,23 to kill all females during embryogenesis and save rearing costs. TESS often takes advantage of transposable elements incorporating the Tet-off system, allowing the generation of transgenic insect strains to be reared on diets supplemented with tetracycline. This drug binds to the tetracycline transactivator (tTA) protein and prevents its interaction with the tetracycline response element (TRE) in the genetic construct24. When tetracycline is removed, a lethal gene linked to the TRE is activated only in females due to the presence of an intron with a sex-specific splicing pattern, thus eliminating all female embryos produced under laboratory and mass-rearing conditions18,19,22,23. In theory, such FK strategies are more effective than the SIT approach because fewer insects are required for a shorter period of time to achieve the same suppression effect11,25.

The tTA can be expressed under the control of cellularization gene promoters (driver cassette), which are most active during the early blastoderm stage, thus ensuring embryonic lethality26. The female-specific intron from a sex determination gene such as transformer (tra) is typically placed within a pro-apoptotic gene (effector cassette) to ensure that only females are killed18,19,22,23. We have previously reported the isolation and analysis of D. suzukii cellularization gene promoters, pro-apoptotic genes, and the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of the tra gene from the standard USA laboratory strain27,28,29. In these studies, we confirmed the embryonic expression of the cellularization genes nullo, serendipity-α (sry-α), bottleneck (bnk), and slow-as-molasses (slam) and the functionality of the pro-apoptotic genes head involution defective (hid), grim, and reaper (rpr). Here, we generated 16 all-in-one (AIO) piggyBac plasmids containing the driver and effector cassettes in a single genetic construct. Some of these constructs were tested in vitro for their effect on cell survival, and the most promising ones were used to generate transgenic D. suzukii strains. We also measured tTA expression levels and determined the developmental stage of lethality for females in the absence of tetracycline in several FK strains.

Results

Construct design and cell culture experiments

We generated a range of AIO lethal constructs for in vitro cell culture assays and in vivo analysis, each containing the AmCyan marker gene controlled by the constitutive D. melanogaster polyubiquitin (PUb) promoter and an attP recombination site (Fig. 1a,b). Each AIO construct consisted of a driver cassette in which either the Dssry-α or Dsnullo promoter was placed upstream of the tTA coding region and an effector cassette containing either a phospho-mutated version of hid (DshidAla4) or the wildtype (WT) version of grim (Dsgrim). The effector cassettes also featured the TRE sequence fused to the minimal P or hs43 promoter (TRE-p or TRE-hs43)18 and the female-specific splicing intron CctraF or DstraF (from Ceratitis capitata and D. suzukii tra genes, respectively) immediately downstream of the ATG translational start codon of the pro-apoptotic gene18,21. To evaluate the lethality of these constructs, the driver construct with the Dssry-α promoter (V132) and the AIO constructs with DstraF (Fig. 1b) were tested in AsE01 cells, originally derived from embryos (aged 20 h) of the Caribbean fruit fly A. suspensa30. AsE01 cells were co-transfected with pIE4-EGFP and one of the test constructs, and the cell survival (%) was calculated by dividing the number of EGFP positive cells from each test construct by the number of EGFP positive cells from the control construct (V132). The results suggested that all the AIO constructs significantly reduced cell survival compared to V132 (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA). With V132 set to 100% survival, the AIO constructs fell into three broad groups defined by lethality. V185 and V186 represented the least effective group (49% and 42% cell viability, respectively), whereas V146, V147, V183, and V184 were moderately effective (22%, 21%, 28%, and 29% cell viability, respectively). The most lethal constructs were V188, with 1.3% viability, and V187, with 0.9% survival (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1
figure1

Female-killing genetic constructs and cell culture analysis. Schematic map of the all-in-one (AIO) piggyBac vectors, all of which comprise driver and effector cassettes based on the tetracycline-off system. The AIO constructs contain the female-specific transformer (tra) intron from (a) C. capitata (CctraF), or (b) D. suzukii (DstraF). All constructs harbor the AmCyan marker gene controlled by the constitutive D. melanogaster polyubiquitin (PUb) promoter and an attP recombination site. (c) AsE01 cells were co-transfected with pIE4-EGFP and one of the AIO constructs containing DstraF. The number of cells showing green fluorescence was counted using Image J. The cell survival (%) was calculated by dividing the number of EGFP positive cells from each construct by the number of EGFP positive cells from the control construct (V132). Each bar presents the mean ± SE of n = 3 experiments. Different letters in (c) indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA, Holm-Šidák method).

Germline transformation and female lethality tests

In the first round of injections, five AIO constructs containing the DstraF intron were used for piggyBac-mediated germline transformation, resulting in two independent transgenic lines from V146, five from V183, six from V185, and one from V188 (Table S1). The transgene had inserted into the X chromosome in one of the V183 lines (F36m1), whereas all other lines were autosomal transformants. Most lines were bred to homozygosity on standard tetracycline diet (100 µg/ml) before female lethality tests, but V188 (M11m2) was weak and produced few homozygous offspring, and was therefore tested for female lethality using heterozygous flies. In the absence of tetracycline, the proportion of female offspring in these lines was 47.2–58.2% (P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA, Table 1), suggesting that the DstraF intron was inactive or the transgene was not expressed in adequate levels to induce lethality in females.

Table 1 Female lethality tests for different transgenic D. suzukii lines.

In the second round of injections, we used the AIO constructs containing the CctraF intron. Constructs V215, V226, V227, and V229 each generated one autosomal transgenic line. Homozygous flies from lines V226_F4m2, V215_M8f5, and V227_M5F1 were viable and fertile on standard tetracycline diet and produced similar numbers of male and female offspring when switched to diets without tetracycline. Homozygous males from line V229_M4f1 were viable, but all homozygous females died before the adult stage on the standard tetracycline-supplemented diet. Lethality tests in heterozygous V229_M4f1 flies showed that only 14.9% of the newly emerged adults were females, which was significantly different to WT (52.2%) under restrictive tetracycline conditions (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA, Table 1). Therefore, the constructs V229 and V251 were selected for the third round of injections, featuring the Dsnullo promoter, DshidAla4 effector gene, and CctraF intron differing only in the nature of the minimal promoter linked to TRE (Fig. 1a). We injected another 1795 embryos with V229, from which 64 fertile G0 flies (22 females and 42 males) were crossed, and six autosomal lines were recovered. Notably, all these V229 transgenic lines were from the G0 male crosses, suggesting that the transient expression of V229 killed the G0 females. We injected another 1495 embryos with V251, yielding only 21 fertile G0 adults. No transgenic flies were obtained from these G0, and the fertile eclosion rates were much lower than other constructs suggesting the transient expression of V251 may be toxic (Table S1).

A meta-analysis suggested that most piggyBac constructs for insect applications are 10,000–15,000 bp in length31. Here, the size of AIO constructs fell within the range 10,503–14,818 bp and the transformation frequencies were 3.4–11.6%, which is lower than the 16% that previously reported32. Increased donor and helper concentrations for V229 were associated with a reduced hatch rate of 27.1 to 17.5% and an increased transformation frequency of 3.8 to 9.4% (Table S1). All lines generated from the first and second round of injections produced fewer adult offspring than those of WT flies, possibly reflecting the fitness cost of the transgene (Table 1). Specifically, there was no significant difference in the number of male offspring between WT and any of the transgenic strains (P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA), whereas the WT strain produced significantly more female offspring than those from V185_M1m1, V227_M5F1, and V229_M4f1 under restrictive tetracycline conditions (P < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). In addition, the ratio of female offspring from V229_M4f1 was significantly lower than those from V185_M1m1 and V227_M5F1 (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA). As observed for V229_M4f1, we were unable to breed the other V229 lines to homozygosity because homozygous females were non-viable on standard tetracycline diet. To determine whether the unwanted female lethality in the V229 lines was caused by a tetracycline dose insufficient to completely inhibit tTA binding to TRE (100 µg/ml), we tested flies from lines V229_M4f1, V229_M8f2, and V229_M36m1 with different concentrations of tetracycline (250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL) as well as doxycycline (100, 250 and 500 μg/mL), the latter being more effective than tetracycline for the suppression of tTA-induced lethality26,33,34. However, no homozygous adult females were recovered under any of these conditions, suggesting that homozygous females died due to the basal expression of DshidAla4. All V229 lines were therefore maintained by crossing heterozygous flies on standard tetracycline diet in each generation.

Staged-lethality tests for V229 lines

To evaluate the FK efficiency of each V229 line, the heterozygous males were crossed with WT females in the absence of tetracycline (Table 2). Half the offspring were expected to be WT with a 1:1 sex ratio, and the other half were expected to be transgenic flies (heterozygous) with a strongly male-biased sex ratio. Indeed, all crosses produced similar numbers of WT males and females (female percentages ranged between 48.1 and 53.4%, P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA), and the eclosion rates of WT flies were not significantly different in the range of 70.4–75.0% (P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA, Table 2). As expected, a considerably lower female ratio of transgenic flies (fluorescent) was produced compared to that of WT flies in each cross (P < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). For example, crosses of the three lines M37f2, M39m1, and M41f1 generated transgenic offspring with only 1.3%, 10.2%, and 1.9% females, respectively. Females died within three days after emergence (Table 2). The eclosion rates of transgenic flies from these crosses were 39.9%, 40.6%, and 31.3%, respectively, which was significantly lower than those of WT flies (P < 0.05, One-way ANOVA), suggesting that most females died at the pupal stage. Notably, crosses to M44m1 individuals produced only transgenic males on emergence day and the eclosion rates of transgenic (69.8%) and WT (73.8%) flies were not significantly different (P > 0.05), suggesting that females died before the pupal stage (Table 2). In addition, the number of emerged WT and transgenic male offspring that survived until the end of day 1 or day 3 was significantly different from the M39m1 cross (P < 0.05, One-way ANOVA), indicating a deleterious effect of the transgene on the males in this line.

Table 2 Heterozygous tests for different V229 lines.

To pinpoint the developmental stage of lethality in females, we carried out staged lethality tests in the absence of tetracycline by backcrossing the M4f1 and M44m1 lines individually to WT flies resulting in a strong FK effect (Fig. 2). From 3500 eggs each, 3228 WT and 3351 V229_M4f1 first-instar larvae were counted (no significant difference in the survival rate, P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA), indicating that V229_M4f1 females did not die during embryogenesis. Counted numbers of third-instar larvae, pupae and adult males from line V229_M4f1 were lower than those from WT, but not significantly different (P > 0.05, One-way ANOVA), but far fewer adult females (110) were generated from this line compared to WT (895) suggesting that V229_M4f1 females died at the pupal stage (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA). In contrast, line V229_M44m1 produced 1421 first-instar larvae, approximately half the WT number (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA), and only males developed from these larvae, indicating that V229_M44m1 females predominantly died at the embryonic stage (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Determination of the lethal stage in transgenic D. suzukii lines. Homozygous males from lines V229_M4f1 or V229_M44m1 were crossed with wild-type (WT) virgin females on tetracycline-free diet, 500 embryos were collected, and we recorded the numbers of first-instar (L1) and third-instar (L3) larvae, pupae, adult males and adult females. Similar tests were conducted by crossing WT males and females as controls. The survival rate was calculated by dividing the number of flies in the corresponding stage or sex by the number of embryos. Each bar presents the mean ± SE of n = 7 experiments. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA, Holm-Šidák method).

The expression of tTA in different transgenic lines

The tTA expression level in early embryos and female adults was determined by qRT-PCR, revealing higher tTA expression in the transgenic lines featuring the Dsnullo promoter compared to those featuring the Dssry-α promoter (Fig. 3). For example, tTA expression in V188_M11m2 (Dsnullo-tTA) heterozygous embryos was 44.7-fold higher (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA) and in adult females was 6.1-fold higher (P = 0.036, One-way ANOVA) than in corresponding homozygous V185_M1m1(Dssry-α -tTA) individuals. Given that the V185 and V188 effector cassettes are identical (TREp-DstraF_DshidAla4), the difference in fitness between V185_M1m1 and V188_M11m2 (Table 1) must reflect either the toxicity of tTA accumulation14 or the induced expression of DshidAla4. Furthermore, tTA expression in V227_M5f1 (Dsnullo-tTA) embryos was 6.1-fold higher (P = 0.013, One-way ANOVA) than in V215_M8f5 (Dssry-α -tTA) embryos, but V227_M5f1 showed no FK effect (Table 1). This suggests that the V227 effector cassette (TREp-CctraF_Dsgrim) was inefficient at killing. Among the V229 lines, the highest tTA expression level was observed in M44m1 and the lowest in M8m2. Specifically, tTA expression in line V229_M44m1 embryos was 48.5-fold higher (P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA) and in females was 6.8-fold higher (P = 0.009, One-way ANOVA) than in corresponding individuals from line V229_M8m2. This was consistent with the lethality tests because V229_M44m1 was the only line that showed predominantly early female lethality whereas V229_M8m2 showed the weakest FK effect among the V209 lines (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Figure 3
figure3

The tTA expression level in early embryos (E) and adult females (F) of different transgenic D. suzukii lines determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Homozygous (Ho) flies from lines V185, V215 and V227, and heterozygous (He) flies from lines V188 and V209 were compared. Gene expression was normalized to the reference gene TBP and is presented as a relative quantity based the tTA expression level in the embryos of line V185_M1m1. Data are presented as the mean ± SE from three replicate experiments. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA, Holm-Šidák method).

Discussion

The development of effective TESS constructs for D. suzukii benefits from the inclusion of homologous regulatory elements with predictable activity. Accordingly, we previously tested the promoters from four D. suzukii cellularization genes, revealing that the Dsnullo promoter achieved the strongest reporter gene expression in D. melanogaster S2 cells28. The sry-α promoter is also widely used for TESS constructs in fruit fly species18,19,20. We therefore selected the Dsnullo and Dssry-α promoters to control tTA expression in the driver cassette of our AIO constructs. Similarly, Dsgrim and Dshid were shown to be more potent pro-apoptotic genes than Dsrpr in S2 cell death assays29. We therefore used Dsgrim and DshidAla4, the latter predicted to be more lethal than the endogenous version18,21, in our effector cassette. Driver and effector plasmids using cellularization gene promoters or pro-apoptotic genes from C. capitata and A. suspensa were previously shown to kill AsE01 cells35. Here, we showed that our AIO plasmids also significantly reduce the survival of AsE01 cells, and that constructs containing the Dsnullo promoter and DshidAla4 (V187 and V188) were more cytotoxic than the other constructs (Fig. 1c). This is consistent with the in vivo tests, which showed that all transgenic lines generated using construct V229 (Dsnullo promoter + DshidAla4) killed females efficiently whereas lines featuring the Dssry-α promoter and/or Dsgrim were not female lethal (Tables 1 and 2). Indeed, higher tTA expression levels were observed in the transgenic D. suzukii lines featuring the Dsnullo promoter compared to the Dssry-α promoter (Fig. 3). These results indicate that the chosen Dsnullo promoter fragment expresses tTA to a higher level than the Dssry-α promoter, and DshidAla4 is a more effective lethal gene than Dsgrim in D. suzukii.

The nullo promoter has been used in the TESS construct for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina, in which all females died during embryogenesis23. In contrast, we found that the females of most V229 lines died at the pupal or adult stages, which means that feed would be wasted raising these females in a SIT program (Table 2, Fig. 2). The only exception was line V229_M44m1, in which all the females were eliminated during embryogenesis and tTA expression was highest among all the lines we tested (Fig. 2). The differences in tTA expression among different V229 lines probably reflected the chromosomal position effect, and it appears that a high level of tTA expression was needed to trigger the lethal dose of DshidAla4 at the early developmental stage. To achieve the rapid and strong production of tTA, other promoters from genes that are highly active at the pre-blastoderm stage could be considered for the driver cassette, such as genes involved in pattern formation36. The TRE from construct V229 comprises seven copies of the tTA binding site (tetracycline operator or tetO), so the performance of the effector cassette could be improved by using an alternative TRE with 21 tetO copies and a higher induction ratio21,23. These modifications could boost the production of DshidAla4 and thus kill females before the feeding stage. Another critical improvement needed for the effector cassette is to reduce the basal expression of DshidAla4 so females would be viable for homozygous breeding in the presence of tetracycline. A Drosophila synthetic core promoter (DSCP) has been developed in D. melanogaster with minimal leakage compared to the minimal hsp70 promoter37. This could be used to replace the hs43 or P minimal promoters in the effector cassette, ensuring the efficient suppression of DshidAla4 in the presence of tetracycline.

Female-specific splicing was induced by the CctraF intron in our V229 lines but the DstraF intron was unexpectedly inactive. Homologous regulatory elements usually outperform their heterologous counterparts when using the tetracycline-off system in transgenic organisms38,39. For example, CctraF and its counterpart from the New World screwworm fly C. hominivorax (ChtraF) were successfully used for female-specific splicing in both species because they share identical splice donor site and similar acceptor sites19,40. These sites are also highly conserved among several other dipteran species, suggesting they are important for sex-specific splicing41. We evaluated the DstraF and CctraF splice sites using a Drosophila splice site prediction program42 and multiple sequence alignments of endogenous genes and different gene constructs (Fig. S1). The results suggested that the exon sequences adjacent to the traF splice donor and acceptor sites may play a key role in splicing according to the genetic context, and a mismatch at this position between the endogenous Dstra (G-A) and our AIO constructs (G-G) may contribute to the inactivity of DstraF in our constructs (Fig. S1). For future development, DstraF could be placed between the adjoining G and A in the coding sequence of the effector gene. Furthermore, traF with adjacent G-G in the exons (as found in D. albomicans and D. innubila; Fig. S1b) could be inserted at the same position as DstraF in V229 as a possible approach for female-specific splicing of the pro-apoptotic gene.

The FK strains were maintained under heterozygous conditions by manual screening because the lethality of the construct to homozygous females could not be suppressed using tetracycline. Such approach would be unfeasible in a mass-rearing program, therefore homozygous viable and stable FK strains are still needed for the potential SIT application in D. suzukii. Our FK strains carry a single AIO gene construct at one locus, while the TESS strains in other insect species often have two constructs (drive and effector) located at two, separate locuses18,19,21,22. Population genetics model suggested that the two-construct strain can cause stronger population suppression compared to single construct strain25. Therefore, the driver and effector cassettes from the V229 vector can be arranged into two constructs which can be used to generate independent transgenic lines. By evaluating the activities of tTA and pro-apoptotic gene in these driver and effector lines, respectively, it should be possible to develop an FK strain without the leaky lethality by choosing driver and effector lines with moderate transgene activities43.

The release of fertile males carrying FK alleles was predicted to be more advantageous than sterile SIT males by mathematical modelling. This comes from the persistence of the FK effect through multiple generations from a transgene propagated via heterozygous males11,25,44. First greenhouse- and field-cage studies have been carried out for the FK strains of several insect species and the results supported the theoretical modeling and suggested that FK can be an effective method for population suppression44,45,46. However, the decision of releasing fertile strains should be carefully evaluated since the resistance to the lethality systems could arise. Recent studies showed that spontaneous mutations in a genetic strain could lead to the buildup of revertants, and in addition, a pre-existing inherent variation in the targeted field population could suppress the lethal system of an effector gene47,48. Nevertheless, FK approach can be used to produce male-only population and prevent the collateral damage to the fruits compared to a bi-sexual release, in which females can still damage fruits and lead to subsequent infestations even if they are sterilized49,50. Another technology in that direction was the development of a female to male sex reversal system in D. suzukii that was achieved by introducing a temperature-sensitive point mutation in the sex-determination gene transformer-2 to reverse all females via heat shock to males51. However, male-only populations could not be obtained with this system because chromosomal XX females developed as sterile intersexuals, while XY males were sterile. Our study here characterized the performance of some key TESS components such as cellularization gene promoters, pro-apoptotic genes and sex-specific spliced introns, which could facilitate the development of future genetic control strategies for D. suzukii that require early or sex-specific gene expression or insect lethality and allow for the generation of male-only insect populations.

Methods and materials

Insect rearing and germ-line transformation

The wild-type (WT) D. suzukii USA strain and transgenic lines were maintained at 25 °C and 55–60% humidity with a 12-h photoperiod. The WT-USA strain was reared on tetracycline-free diet, and all transgenic strains were maintained on the same diet supplemented with 100 μg/mL tetracycline (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Flies were anesthetized with CO2 for screening and to set up crosses. Germ-line transformation with piggyBac constructs (Supplementary Material 1) was carried out as previously described32, except the eggs were collected from the WT-USA flies maintained on diets supplemented with 100 μg/mL tetracycline for at least 2 days before injection. A mixture of the piggyBac donor construct (500 or 700 ng/µl) and the phsp-pBac transposase helper (200 or 300 ng/µl) was injected into WT embryos. G0 adults were crossed to WT flies and offspring were screened for expression of the fluorescent marker at the pupal/adult stages. Segregation tests were conducted by outcrossing the transformants to WT flies, and independent homozygous strains were established by screening the fluorescence intensity at the third-instar larval stage for homozygous individuals. In some strains, homozygous females were not viable when the diet was supplemented with 100 μg/mL tetracycline and breeding was carried out with higher concentrations of tetracycline (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) or with doxycycline (Alfa Aesar) at concentrations of 100, 250 or 500 μg/mL.

Cell culture experiments

The Anastrepha suspensa cell line UFENY-AsE0130 was cultivated in Schneider’s medium with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hi-FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in closed-capped flasks without CO2 at 27.5 °C. Cells were passaged every 2 days until they reached ≥ 90% viability. For transient transfection, we used Xfectin reagent (Takara) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 4 × 105 live cells in 500 µl medium on 13-mm TC coverslips (SARSTEDT). After settling for 3 h, the cells were co-transfected with 0.5 µg pIE4-EGFP52 and 0.5 µg AIO or driver construct, 0.3 µl Xfectin, 28.7 µl Xfectin buffer and 270 µl serum-free Schneider’s medium. After incubation for 4 h at 27.5 °C, the medium was replaced with 500 µl Schneider’s containing 10% Hi-FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and the cells were incubated for a further ~ 16 h at 27.5 °C. For visualization, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min and washed once with PBS. Cells expressing EGFP were imaged using an M205FA MZ FLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems) with EGFP filter sets (λexcitation = 500/20; λemission = 535/30) and consistent settings. TC coverslips containing adhesive fluorescent cells were placed on a slide over a drop of Hi-FBS. We captured 10 images per coverslip, and counted the cells using Image J (Fiji) by first converting to 8-bit (threshold 35) inverted images, and then applying the watershed and automated cell count functions. The cell survival (%) was calculated by dividing the number of EGFP positive cells from each construct by the number of EGFP positive cells from the control construct (V132).

Female lethality and staged lethality tests

To test the female lethality of homozygous AIO strains, newly emerged males and females were collected and reared separately on a tetracycline-free diet. Five males and 10 virgin females (3–5 days old) were then crossed in a large food vial (tetracycline-free, 175 ml volume, 50 × 100 mm), and the number of eggs was recorded every day during the transfer of flies into a new vial with fresh tetracycline-free diet for a further 7 days. We then counted the number of pupae and newly emerged adult males and females. For AIO strains with weak or nonviable homozygous females, we tested female lethality in a similar manner by crossing five homozygous males and 10 WT virgin females. For AIO strains in which female killing occurred at later developmental stages, female lethality was tested by crossing five heterozygous males and 10 WT virgin females, and then counting the number of fluorescent and non-fluorescent offspring at the pupal and adult (1 or 3 days after emergence) stages. One or three replicates were used for the female lethality test of each strain. The staged lethality tests were conducted by crossing WT or transgenic homozygous males with WT virgin females on tetracycline-free diet, and 500 eggs were collected on the glass slide, overlaid with halocarbon oil 700 (Sigma-Aldrich) and placed in the oxygen chamber. The hatched larvae were counted and transferred to the small food vial (50 ml volume, 29 × 95 mm; up to 50 larvae per vial) without tetracycline, and we scored the number of third-instar larvae, pupae, newly emerged adult males and females. For each transgenic or WT strain, the staged tests were carried out seven times.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from embryos (2–6 h) or 5-day-old females using the Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs), and 0.5 μg was used for cDNA synthesis with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). Homozygous flies from lines V185, V215 and V227 were used for RNA extraction, whereas heterozygous flies from lines V188 and V209 were used due to homozygous lethality. The QuantiNova SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) was used for qPCR in a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Each reaction was heated to 98 °C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The primers are listed in Table S2. Three biological and three technical replicates were carried out for each reaction, and results were normalized to the TATA binding protein (TBP) reference gene using the 2-∆∆Ct method as previously described28,29.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SigmaPlot (v14.0). Differences in the post-transfection survival of AsE01 cells (cell count) expressing different constructs, in the survival rate, eclosion rate, fly number or female ratio of different insect strains for the staged or female lethality tests, and in the tTA expression levels of different transgenic lines, were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means (log or square root transformed) were separated using the Holm-Šidák method.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. 1.

    Asplen, M. K. et al. Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities. J. Pest Sci. 88, 469–494 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dos Santos, L. A. et al. Global potential distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae). PLoS ONE 12, e0174318 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rota-Stabelli, O., Blaxter, M. & Anfora, G. Drosophila suzukii. Curr. Biol. 23, R8–9 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Atallah, J., Teixeira, L., Salazar, R., Zaragoza, G. & Kopp, A. The making of a pest: the evolution of a fruit-penetrating ovipositor in Drosophila suzukii and related species. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132840 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nikolouli, K., Sassù, F., Mouton, L., Stauffer, C. & Bourtzis, K. Combining sterile and incompatible insect techniques for the population suppression of Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest Sci. 93, 647–661 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sassù, F., Nikolouli, K., Stauffer, C., Bourtzis, K. & Cáceres, C. Sterile insect technique and incompatible insect technique for the intergrated Drosophila suzukii management. In Drosophila suzukii Management (ed Garcia, F. R. M. ) 169–194 (Springer, 2020).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Knipling, E. F. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 459–462 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Knipling, E. F. Sterile-male method of population control. Science 130, 902–904 (1959).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Klassen, W. & Curtis, C. F. History of the sterile insect technique. In Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (eds Dyck, V. A. et al.) 4–19 (Springer, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Scott, M. J., Concha, C., Welch, J. B., Phillips, P. L. & Skoda, S. R. Research advances in the screwworm eradication program over the past 25 years. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 164, 226–236 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schliekelman, P. & Gould, F. Pest control by the release of insects carrying a female-killing allele on multiple loci. J. Econ. Entomol. 93, 1566–1579 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heinrich, J. C. & Scott, M. J. A repressible female-specific lethal genetic system for making transgenic insect strains suitable for a sterile-release program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 8229–8232 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Thomas, D. D., Donnelly, C. A., Wood, R. J. & Alphey, L. S. Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system. Science 287, 2474–2476 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fu, G. et al. Female-specific insect lethality engineered using alternative splicing. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 353–357 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Harvey-Samuel, T., Ant, T. & Luke, A. Towards the genetic control of invasive species. Biol. Invasions 19, 1683–1703 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rendon, P., McInnis, D., Lance, D. & Stewart, J. Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 1547–1553 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Franz, G., Bourtzis, K. & Cáceres, C. P. Practical and operational genetic sexing systems based on classical genetic approaches in fruit flies, an example for other species amenable to large-scale rearing for the sterile insect technique. In Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (eds Dyck, V. A. et al.) 4–19 (CRC Press 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schetelig, M. F. & Handler, A. M. A transgenic embryonic sexing system for Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42, 790–795 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ogaugwu, C. E., Schetelig, M. F. & Wimmer, E. A. Transgenic sexing system for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on female-specific embryonic lethality. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 1–8 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schetelig, M. F., Targovska, A., Meza, J. S., Bourtzis, K. & Handler, A. M. Tetracycline-suppressible female lethality and sterility in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. Insect Mol. Biol. 25, 500–508 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yan, Y. & Scott, M. J. A transgenic embryonic sexing system for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Sci. Rep. 5, 16090 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Concha, C. et al. An early female lethal system of the New World screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, for biotechnology-enhanced SIT. BMC Genet. 21, 143 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yan, Y. et al. Improved transgenic sexing strains for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using embryo-specific gene promoters. Mol. Genet. Genomics 295, 287–298 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gossen, M. & Bujard, H. Tight control of gene-expression in mammalian-cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5547–5551 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vella, M. R., Fred, G. & Lloyd, A. L. Mathematical modeling of genetic pest management through female-specific lethality: Is one locus better than two? Evol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13228 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Horn, C. & Wimmer, E. A. A transgene-based, embryo-specific lethality system for insect pest management. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 64–70 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schwirz, J., Yan, Y., Franta, Z. & Schetelig, M. F. Bicistronic expression and differential localization of proteins in insect cells and Drosophila suzukii using picornaviral 2A peptides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 119, 103324 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yan, Y., Jaffri, S. A., Schwirz, J., Stein, C. & Schetelig, M. F. Identification and characterization of four Drosophila suzukii cellularization genes and their promoters. BMC Genet. 21, 146 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jaffri, S. A., Yan, Y., Schwirz, J. & Schetelig, M. F. Functional characterization of the Drosophila suzukii pro-apoptotic genes reaper, head involution defective and grim. Apoptosis 25, 864–874 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shi, X. Z. & Lawrence, P. O. An embryonic cell line from the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Vitro Cell Dev-An 35, 12–14 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gregory, M., Alphey, L., Morrison, N. I. & Shimeld, S. M. Insect transformation with piggyBac: getting the number of injections just right. Insect Mol. Biol. 25, 259–271 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schetelig, M. F. & Handler, A. M. Germline transformation of the spotted wing drosophilid, Drosophila suzukii, with a piggyBac transposon vector. Genetica 141, 189–193 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Berens, C. & Hillen, W. Gene regulation by tetracyclines—constraints of resistance regulation in bacteria shape TetR for application in eukaryotes. Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 3109–3121 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Urlinger, S. et al. Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 7963–7968 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schetelig, M. F. & Handler, A. M. Strategy for enhanced transgenic strain development for embryonic conditional lethality in Anastrepha suspensa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 9348–9353 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    ten Bosch, J. R., Benavides, J. A. & Cline, T. W. The TAGteam DNA motif controls the timing of Drosophila pre-blastoderm transcription. Development 133, 1967–1977 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Qiao, H. H. et al. An efficient and multiple target transgenic RNAi technique with low toxicity in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 9, 4160 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schetelig, M. F., Caceres, C., Zacharopoulou, A., Franz, G. & Wimmer, E. A. Conditional embryonic lethality to improve the sterile insect technique in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Biol. 7, 4 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li, F., Wantuch, H. A., Linger, R. J., Belikoff, E. J. & Scott, M. J. Transgenic sexing system for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 80–88 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Concha, C. et al. A transgenic male-only strain of the New World screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique. BMC Biol. 14, 72 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, F., Vensko, S. P. I., Belikoff, E. J. & Scott, M. J. Conservation and sex-specific splicing of the transformer gene in the Calliphorids Cochliomyia hominivorax, Cochliomyia macellaria and Lucilia sericata. PLoS ONE 8, e56303 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Reese, M. G., Eeckman, F. H., Kulp, D. & Haussler, D. Improved splice site detection in Genie. J. Comput. Biol. 4, 311–323 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yan, Y., Williamson, M. E. & Scott, M. J. Using moderate transgene expression to improve the genetic sexing system of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Insects. 11, 11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Harvey-Samuel, T. et al. Pest control and resistance management through release of insects carrying a male-selecting transgene. BMC Biol. 13, 49 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Leftwich, P. T. et al. Genetic elimination of field-cage populations of Mediterranean fruit flies. Proc. Royal Soc. B 281, 20141372 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    de Valdez, W. M. R. et al. Genetic elimination of dengue vector mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 4772–4775 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Knudsen, K. E. et al. Genetic variation and potential for resistance development to the tTA overexpression lethal system in insects. G3 10, 1271–1281 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhao, Y., Schetelig, M. F. & Handler, A. M. Genetic breakdown of a Tet-off conditional lethality system for insect population control. Nat. Commun. 11, 3095 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nguyen, T. N. M., Choo, A. & Baxter, S. W. Lessons from drosophila: engineering genetic sexing strains with temperature-sensitive lethality for sterile insect technique applications. Insects 12, 243 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cayol, J. P., Causse, R., Louis, C. & Barthes, J. Medfly Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Dipt, Trypetidae) as a rot vector in laboratory conditions. J. Appl. Entomol. 117, 338–343 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li, J. & Handler, A. M. Temperature-dependent sex-reversal by a transformer-2 gene-edited mutation in the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Sci. Rep. 7, 12363 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Schetelig, M. F., Nirmala, X. & Handler, A. M. Pro-apoptotic cell death genes, hid and reaper, from the tephritid pest species, Anastrepha suspensa. Apoptosis 16, 759–768 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Bashir Hosseini for excellent technical assistance. We thank Derya Arslan, Akriti Subedi, Julia Hehner, Kevin Baumann, Tamara Zenz, Silvan Löbsack, Hongyi Fan, Nathalie Schlimm, and Janina Ebert for their help with fly stock keeping and the lethality tests.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study benefited from discussions at meetings for the Coordinated Research Project, “Comparing Rearing Efficiency and Competitiveness of Sterile Male Strains Produced by Genetic, Transgenic or Symbiont-based Technologies,” funded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This work was supported by the Emmy Noether program of the German Research Foundation (SCHE 1833/1-1; to MFS) and the Fraunhofer Attract program of the Fraunhofer Society (‘Applications for population control of D. suzukii’; to MFS).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F.S, Y.Y. and J.S. performed research. Y.Y. and M.F.S conceived the study, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Yan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schetelig, M.F., Schwirz, J. & Yan, Y. A transgenic female killing system for the genetic control of Drosophila suzukii. Sci Rep 11, 12938 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91938-1

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing