Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Intraocular pressure and choroidal thickness postural changes in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) and choroidal thickness (ChT) postural changes in multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients and healthy controls (HC). 20 MSA patients, 21 PD patients and 14 HC, were examined. All subjects underwent a complete examination, including corneal thickness, ChT, IOP and axial length (AL) measurements. IOP measurement was performed in supine, sitting, and standing positions, whereas ChT in sitting and standing positions. Supine to standing IOP variations were significantly higher in MSA vs PD(p = 0.01) and in MSA vs HC (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were observed between PD and HC (p = 0.397). Mean sub-foveal ChT in MSA was 240 ± 92 μm in sitting position, and 215 ± 94 μm in standing position with a significant reduction (p = 0.008). Mean sub-foveal ChT in PD was 258 ± 79 μm in sitting position, and 259 ± 76 μm in standing position (p = 0.887). In HC it was 244 ± 36 μm in sitting position, and 256 ± 37 μm in standing position with a significant increase (p = 0.007). The significant IOP and ChT postural changes can be considered additional hallmarks of autonomic dysfunction in MSA and further studies are needed to consider them as biomarkers in the differential diagnosis with PD.

Introduction

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a late-onset, sporadic neurodegenerative disease that manifests as an autonomic failure with the variable presence of poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism and/or cerebellar ataxia, linked to striatonigral degeneration and olivopontocerebellar atrophy, respectively1,2. Non-motor symptoms are strongly associated with neurodegeneration in the brainstem and spinal cord. MSA pathology typically affects multiple regions of the brainstem, including the locus coeruleus, catecholaminergic neurons of the ventrolateral medulla, as well as the dorsal vagal nucleus and the ventrolateral nucleus ambiguous3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Spinal cord pathology is characterized by neuronal loss in the intermediolateral columns and the Onuf’s nucleus in the lumbosacral region11,12. Orthostatic hypotension is a typical dysautonomic feature in MSA and is present in about 60% of patients2,13.

Intraocular pressure (IOP) postural variations have been reported in MSA and pure autonomic failure (PAF)14,15, and are supposed to be related to autonomic dysfunction at the ocular level. However, the pathophysiology of this finding is not clearly understood. Besides IOP, choroidal thickness (ChT) too could be influenced by postural changes, but, to the best of our knowledge, postural changes in ChT have never been studied in MSA.

Therefore, the aims of our study were:

  1. 1)

    to confirm the IOP postural changes in MSA patients compared with patients affected by Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC).

  2. 2)

    to assess postural variations in ChT, to better understand the pathophysiology of ocular autonomic dysfunction in MSA.

Methods

Twenty patients with probable MSA diagnosed according to the current criteria16, 21 PD patients fulfilling the current diagnostic criteria17, and 14 controls subjects without known systemic or ocular disease were included in the study. Disease duration was recorded, and disease severity was assessed by theUnified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) part II in MSA, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III in PD (Table 1). Orthostatic symptoms in MSA patients were graded according to Item 9 of UMSARS I. Presence of orthostatic hypotension, diagnosed according to the current criteria18, was established based on updated clinical records. PD patients comparable with MSA only by age, and not disease duration as MSA has a progression faster than PD, were enrolled.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical findings of enrolled subjects.

The CECS (Cometico Campania Sud, prot. n°16,544) Institutional Review Board approved this study. Each participant gave written, informed consent for study participation. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination, including ChT examination, with an OCT Spectralis (version 6.0.9; Heidelberg Engineering), in sitting and standing positions and IOP measurement, with a Tono-pen Avia (Reichert Technologies) in supine (after 10 min in a quiet room), sitting (after 5 min) and standing position (after 1 min as most MSA patients experience difficulties in longer standing)19. In each patient the IOP and the ChT were measured in both eyes, and the results were averaged for the statistical analysis. To avoid fluctuations due to the circadian change in IOP and ChT, the measurements were taken at the same time of the day between 3 and 5. Patients with ocular diseases which may have affected either the IOP or choroidal thickness were excluded from the study. All PD and 10 out of 20 MSA patients were treated with dopaminergic drugs and the ophthalmological examinations were performed on-drug.

Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with a Scheimpflug Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany, version 1.19r11) to exclude possible CCT effect on the IOP measurements20. Moreover, axial length (AL) was measured with an IOLMaster (5.4.4.0006; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), as a correlation between ChT and AL has been described21.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Analyses were performed with the SPSS package (version 25, SPSS, IBM). Wilcoxon test was used to compare postural changes within the same group. Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare variations in IOP and ChT after postural changes among the three groups; when significant differences were found among the three groups, a post hoc Mann Whitney U test was used to compare two groups at a time. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess relationships between ocular measurements and clinical features in both groups of patients.

Results

The patients’ demographic and clinical data are summarized in Table 1.

Among the 20 MSA patients, 18 underwent IOP evaluation (one patient refused to have IOP checked and one other was excluded due to a retinal vein occlusion); 9 of them had ChT assessment in both sitting and standing positions ChT was not assessed in 2 patients due to intraocular media opacities and one patient due to a retinal vein occlusion; in the other 9 patients it was not possible to perform the choroidal examination in standing position due to patients difficulties to stand for a long time). Seven out of 18 MSA patients reported no orthostatic symptoms, five reported infrequent orthostatic symptoms that did not restrict activities of daily living (Item 9 UMSARS I score = 1), and six MSA patients reported orthostatic symptoms presenting at least once a week (Item 9 UMSARS I score = 2).

Nineteen PD patients underwent IOP assessment, 18 PD patients had ChT assessment in both sitting and standing positions (in two patients the ChT was not assessed due to intraocular media opacities, whereas another one was excluded due to maculopathy).

No patient was under pharmacological treatment for orthostatic hypotension None of the subjects were affected by systemic diseases potentially affecting IOP such us essential hypertension or diabetes.

Supine to standing IOP variations were significantly higher in MSA vs PD (p = 0.01) and in MSA vs HC (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were observed between PD and HC (p = 0.397) (Tables 2, 3).

Table 2 Intraocular pressure (in mmHg) in different positions among the three groups.
Table 3 Difference in IOP (in mmHg) between different positions among the three groups.

Supine to sitting IOP variations were higher in MSA vs HC (p = 0.014), whereas no significant differences were observed between PD and HC (p = 0.240) and between MSA and PD (p = 0.128).

Sitting to standing IOP variations were higher in MSA vs PD (p = 0.005) and in MSA vs HC (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed between PD and HC (p = 0.760) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Intraocular Pressure variation (in mmHg) in Multiple System Atrophy, Parkinson’s Disease patients and Healthy Controls with postural changes.

Sitting to standing ChT variations were significantly higher in MSA vs PD (p = 0.005) and in MSA vs HC (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were detected between PD and HC (p = 0.56) (Table 4).

Table 4 Choroidal sub-foveal thickness (in µm) among different groups.

MSA patients showed shorter AL than both PD patients (p = 0.003) and HC (p = 0.026) (Table 5).

Table 5 Axial length (AL) in mm and central corneal thickness (CCT) in μm among the three groups.

However, the mean sub-foveal ChT in sitting position was not different among groups (p = NS). Mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was not different (p = 0.651) among groups (Table 5).

No relationships were found between ocular measurements and disease severity or duration in MSA and PD patients. No relationships were found between postural changes in both IOP and ChT and Item 9 score of UMSARS I in MSA patients. No differences were found in positional IOP and ChT changes between MSA patients with or without orthostatic hypotension assessed by updated clinical records. No differences were found in IOP and ChT changes between MSA patients on dopaminergic treatment or without it.

Discussion

The results obtained from this study indicate that MSA patients have significant IOP and ChT postural changes, compared with PD and HC. IOP postural changes have been reported in MSA patients compared with HC; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare MSA with PD patients and to assess postural ChT changes.

A decline in IOP has been described at 1 min from standing in MSA patients compared with HC in two small studies14,15, and has been found to correlate with arterial blood pressure decrease due to postural changes21. The IOP physiology is complex and incompletely understood. IOP is mainly determined by the rates of aqueous humour production and drainage22,23. Arterial and venous pressures changes may have transient effects on IOP24. Raising in venous pressure can reduce aqueous drainage and lead to IOP increase25,26. However, as aqueous drainage is relatively slow27,28,29, it is unlikely that arterial blood pressure changes may account for the rapid IOP decline observed in our study, and it is possible that orthostatic hypotension and IOP decrease independently reflect the autonomic dysfunction of MSA.

The rapid IOP changes observed in our study are probably due to direct pressure and volume changes in the vascular compartments within and around the eye, including the periorbital tissues and the intraocular blood volume, most of which lies in the choroid30.

Indeed, our finding of a significant ChT reduction in MSA patients compared with PD and HC in the standing position, paralleling IOP decrease, supports the hypothesis that choroidal blood volume regulates the production of aqueous humor and ocular tension.

In 1992 Philips et al.24 introduced the concept that blood pressure plays a role in the regulation of ocular tension (the aqueous humor in the eye). They found a correlation between the pulsation of the eye and ocular tension, suggesting that the choroidal blood flow, influenced by the blood pressure, could work like a “piston”, regulating the production and the outflow of aqueous humor.

Changes in IOP according to the body position have been described31,32,33,34,35. In a recent study the IOP increase, observed in HC passing from sitting to upside-down position, was related to choroidal thickening36.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the postural changes-related IOP behavior in PD patients. However, we found that IOP changes in PD patients were similar to HC subjects, whereas positional changes in IOP were significantly higher in MSA patients vs both PD patients and HC.

A study that analyzed the effect of posture on blood and IOP in patients with autonomic dysfunction was conducted by Singleton et al.14. They found a correlation between mean arterial pressure postural changes and IOP postural changes, confirming the importance of the baroreflex system in this mechanism. They did not analyze the ChT, but they used the value of mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP), defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) minus IOP.

In our study, we found a greater reduction in ChT from sitting to standing position in MSA patients compared with both PD and HC. A more preserved baroreflex system in patients with PD compared to MSA could explain the lack of significant differences between PD and HC.

An inverse relationship between AL and ChT has been described in the literature21, however in this study ChT evaluation in sitting position showed a non-significant difference among the three groups, even though MSA patients showed shorter AL than both PD patients and HC. These results suggest that MSA may have thinner ChT compared to the other groups, despite the shorter AL, but further studies in a larger population relating AL ranges with ChT are needed to confirm this finding.

In conclusion, our results show that patients with MSA, more than PD, may have IOP fluctuations during the day, depending on postural changes; this factor should be considered in their ophthalmic management when a treatment for ocular hypertension is planned. IOP changes, seemingly, did not parallel orthostatic symptoms or orthostatic hypotension in MSA patients, suggesting that the altered postural IOP changes may develop independently from orthostatic hypotension. However, we must recognize that supine and orthostatic blood pressure was not assessed at the same time of ophthalmic examination for compliance reasons, thus possibly affecting such findings.

Furthermore, in this study we first demonstrate a reduction in ChT from sitting to standing position in MSA patients, which could be considered as an additional hallmark of autonomic dysfunction in this disease. Additional studies in MSA patients and HC are needed to better understand the effects of IOP changes on ocular and choroidal hemodynamics. Moreover, we suggest that IOP and ChT changes may deserve further studies to prove their feasibility as possible biomarkers to differentiate MSA and PD in early disease stages.

References

  1. Fanciulli, A. & Wenning, G. K. Multiple-system atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 249–2463 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stefanova, N. & Wenning, GK. Review: Multiple system atrophy: emerging targets for interventional therapies. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 42, 20–32 (2016).

  3. Benarroch, E.E. & Schmeichel, A.M. &Parisi JE. Depletion of mesopontine cholinergic and sparing of raphe neurons in multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 59, 944–946 (2002).

  4. Schmeichel, A. M. et al. Mesopontine cholinergic neuron involvement in Lewy body dementia and multiple system atrophy. Neurology 70, 368–373 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benarroch, E. E., Schmeichel, A. M., Low, P. A. & Parisi, J. E. Differential involvement of the periaqueductal gray in multiple system atrophy. Auton. Neurosci. 158, 111–117 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Bernardo, M., Vitiello, L. & Rosa, N. Optic nerve ultrasonography to predict increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiol. J. 32, 227–228 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benarroch, E. E. New findings on the neuropathology of multiple system atrophy. Auton Neurosci. 96, 59–62 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benarroch, E. E. Brainstem in multiple system atrophy: clinicopathological correlations. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 23, 519–526 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benarroch, E. E., Schmeichel, A. M., Low, P. A. & Parisi, J. E. Involvement of medullary serotonergic groups in multiple system atrophy. Ann. Neurol. 55, 418–422 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benarroch, E. E., Schmeichel, A. M., Sandroni, P., Low, P. A. & Parisi, J. E. Involvement of vagal autonomic nuclei in multiple system atrophy and Lewy body disease. Neurology 66, 378–383 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wenning, G.K., Tison, F., Ben Shlomo, Y., Daniel, S.E. & Quinn, N.P. Multiple system atrophy: a review of 203 pathologically proven cases. Mov. Disord. 12, 133–147 (1997).

  12. Yamamoto, T. et al. When is Onuf’s nucleus involved in multiple system atrophy? A sphincter electromyography study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 1645–1648 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozawa, T. Morphological substrate of autonomic failure and neurohormonal dysfunction in multiple system atrophy: impact on determining phenotype spectrum. Acta Neuropathol. 114, 201–211 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singleton, C. D., Robertson, D., Byrne, D. W. & Joos, K. M. Effect of posture on blood and intraocular pressures in multiple system atrophy, pure autonomic failure, and baroreflex failure. Circulation 108, 2349–2354 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dumskyj, M. J., Mathias, C. J., Doré, C. J., Bleasdale-Barr, K. & Kohner, E. M. Postural variation in intraocular pressure in primary chronic autonomic failure. J. Neurol. 249, 712–718 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilman, S. et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 71, 670–676 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Postuma, R. B. et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 30, 1591–1601 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, D., Sandroni, P., Seppi, K. & Vidailhet, M. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 71, 670–676 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Bernardo, M., Cornetta, P., Marotta, G. & Rosa, N. A Prospective longitudinal study to investigate corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for predicting development of glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 195, 243 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Bernardo, M., Capasso, L., Caliendo, L., Vosa, Y. & Rosa, N. Intraocular pressure evaluation after myopic refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 121 eyes. Semin. Ophthalmol. 31, 233–242 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, W. B. et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye study. Ophthalmology 120, 175–180 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Caprioli J. The ciliary epithelia and aqueous humour in Adler’s physiology of the eye. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co. 223–245 (1987).

  23. Moses RA. Intraocular pressure in Adler’s physiology of the eye. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co. 223–245 (1987).

  24. Phillips, C. I., Tsukahara, S., Hosaka, O. & Adams, W. Ocular pulsation correlates with ocular tension: the choroid as piston for an aqueous pump?. Ophthalmic Res. 24, 338–343 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Friberg, T.R., Sanborn, G. & Weinreb RN. Intraocular and episcleral venous pressure increase during inverted posture. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 103, 523–526 (1987).

  26. Arora, N., McLaren, J. W., Hodge, D. O. & Sit, A. J. Effect of body position on epsicleral venous pressure in healthy subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 5151–5156 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brubaker, R. F. The flow of aqueous humor in the human eye. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 80, 391–474 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Carlson, K. H., McLaren, J. W., Topper, J. E. & Brubaker, R. F. Effect of body position on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28, 1346–1352 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Langham, M. E. & Edwards, N. A. New procedure for the measurement of outflow facility in conscious rabbits. Exp. Eye Res. 45, 665–672 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiel, J. W. Choroidal myogenic autoregulation and intraocular pressure. Exp. Eye Res. 58, 529–544 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kothe, A. C. The effect of posture on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Surv. Ophthalmol. 38, 191–197 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prata, T. S., De Moraes, C. G., Kanadani, F. N., Ritch, R. & Paranhos, A. Jr. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Surv. Ophthalmol. 55, 445–453 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang, J., Li, N., Deng, Y. P., Qiu, L. M. & Chen, X. M. Effect of body position on the pathogenesis of asymmetric primary open angle glaucoma. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 11, 94–100 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Park, J. H., Yoo, C., Yang, K. & Kim, Y. Y. Effects of different body postures on the intraocular pressure in patients with primary angle-closure disease. Optom. Vis. Sci. 96, 477–483 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. De Bernardo, M., Borrelli, M., Cembalo, G. & Rosa, N. Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer. Medicina (Kaunas). 55(10):pii: E701 (2019).

  36. Li, F. et al. Upside-down position leads to choroidal expansion and anterior chamber shallowing: OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol. pii:bjophthalmol-2019–314418 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

No financial disclosures.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.R. and P.B. conceived the study. M.D.B., L.C. and M.T.P. wrote the original draft.G.S., M.G. and M.C.R. performed data acquisition and analysis. M.D.B. , M.P., M.A. and R.E. interpretated the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maddalena De Bernardo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Bernardo, M., Salerno, G., Gioia, M. et al. Intraocular pressure and choroidal thickness postural changes in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 11, 8936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88250-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88250-3

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing