Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

UV induced changes in proteome of rats plasma are reversed by dermally applied cannabidiol

Abstract

UV radiation is known to induce a multiple changes in the metabolism of skin-building cells, what can affect the functioning not only neighboring cells, but also, following signal transduction releasing into the blood vessels, the entire body. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the proteomic disturbances occurred in plasma of chronically UVA/UVB irradiated rats and define the effect on these changes of skin topically applied cannabidiol (CBD). Obtained results showed significant changes in the expression of numerous anti-inflammatory and signaling proteins including: NFκB inhibitor, 14-3-3 protein, protein kinase C, keratin, and protein S100 after UV irradiation and CBD treatment. Moreover, the effects of UVA and UVB were manifested by increased level of lipid peroxidation products—protein adducts formation. CBD partially prevented all of these changes, but in a various degree depending on the UV radiation type. Moreover, topical treatment with CBD resulted in the penetration of CBD into the blood and, as a consequence, in direct modifications to the plasma protein structure by creating CBD adducts with molecules, such as proline-rich protein 30, transcription factor 19, or N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase, what significantly changed the activity of these proteins. In conclusion, it may be suggested that CBD applied topically may be an effective compound against systemic UV-induced oxidative stress, but its effectiveness requires careful analysis of CBD's effects on other tissues of the living organism.

Introduction

It is known that UV radiation, as the main environmental physical factor that reaches human skin, causes many changes in the metabolism of skin-building cells1. Depending on the type of UV radiation (UVA or UVB), different types of cells, at different levels, are exposed to this factor to a different extent. UVA, which reaches the epidermis, as well as the dermis, including its basic cells—fibroblasts, is known mainly as an activator of photosensitive compounds such as chromophores2. On the other hand, high-energy UVB is largely retained in the epidermis by keratinocytes and directly in these cells induces changes at the molecular level. Therefore, both types of radiation stimulates skin cells to the generation of signals to produce rapid (neural) or slow (humoral or immune) responses at the local and systemic levels mediated by the skin neuroendocrine system3,4. It is well known that skin, as one of the largest organs of the human body, both receives information about the surrounding environment and through expression of signaling molecules, stimulates action of a well-developed neuroendocrine system, resulting in maintenance of body’s homeostasis5. This natural platform of signal exchange between environment and internal organs is subjected to neurohormonal regulation, but also to produce neuropeptides, biogenic amines, melatonin, opioids, acetylcholine, steroids, secosteroids, growth factors, cytokines, as well as endocannabinoids4,6,7. It has been shown that skin UV irradiation leads to the enhanced β-endorphin, corticosterone, corticotropin-releasing and adrenocorticotropic hormone production accompanied by rapid immunosuppressive effects with decreased body’s immunity8,9. Moreover, skin exposure to UVA or UVB radiation results in disturbances in the generation and removal of reactive oxygen species, leading to oxidative stress, which results in oxidative modifications of nucleic acids, proteins and lipids10. As a consequence, dysfunctional molecules are formed that hinder the efficient metabolism of cells and the normal functioning of the skin. On the other hand, these processes also generate signaling molecules, including pro-inflammatory/pro-apoptotic proteins, as well as lipid peroxidation products such as reactive aldehydes and isoprostanes11. All these molecules can be released into the blood vessels and cause a pro-inflammatory reaction not only in neighboring cells, but also in the entire body3. So far, with the exception of neuroendocrine system activity, the harmful oxidative effects of UV radiation on body tissues have been proven mainly in the liver of UV irradiated mice, where a significant increase in triglycerides was accompanied by a decrease in the level of glutathione (GSH) and the activity of GSSG reductase, superoxide dismutase and catalase12,13. Moreover, UV irradiated mice have elevated level of blood urocanic acid and glutamate, which transferred into brain significantly affects synapses14. So far, systemic human studies showed only the effect of UV radiation on the blood pressure that is lowered by UV radiation through the skin's increased generation of nitric oxide15,16.

With regard to the above harmful properties of UV radiation in this study the cannabidiol (CBD) is proposed as a compound that can effectively counteract the effects of UV radiation. CBD is a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid mainly obtained from Cannabis sativa L. leaves. Its action is based primarily on the interaction with the endocannabinoid system, consisting of endocannabinoids, as well as their specific transmembrane receptors17. CBD inhibits endocannabinoid pro-inflammatory signaling directly by negative modulation of CB1 activity18, or indirectly by interaction with the main agonist of this receptor—anandamide19. CBD antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties leading to enhanced antioxidant enzymes activity, as well as silencing the TNFα/NFκB pathway19,20 are also visible in the context of UV irradiated skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes21,22,23, therefore, it is more and more frequently used especially in the skincare products24. So far, the positive effects of CBD were also used in the design of anti-cancer therapies25, however, it has also been shown to have anticonvulsive, antianxiety, antinausea, and antirheumatoid properties26.

According to the such a broad spectrum of CBD action, connected with its properties of penetration through biological membranes and poly-layer cells cultures21,22, as well as its possibility of infiltration from the skin into the blood27, it is suggested that CBD may have significant impact on the oxidative, as well as pro-inflammatory changes induces by UV radiation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the changes in the proteomic profile of plasma from chronically UVA or UVB irradiated rats and define the effect on these changes of skin topically applied CBD.

Materials and methods

All the methods were performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Animals treatment

The experiment was carried out on nude rats (RH-FOXN1RNU, males weighing 260–302 g) aged for 8–9 weeks. The rats were kept under standard conditions (12 h (h) light/12 h dark cycles) and fed a standard pellet diet, containing a mix of various dietary constituents, including proteins, fibres, and minerals28. All the procedures and experimental protocols on animals were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments in Olsztyn, Poland (resolution No. 37/2019 of 26.04.2019). The rats were divided into six groups of six rats each:

  1. 1.

    [CTR]: control rats, for 4 weeks every 12 h, treated topically by the 20 min application of non-toxic hydrophilic petrolatum to the animal's back, which was then removed.

  2. 2.

    [CBD]: rats, which back 4 weeks every 12 h was treated topically for 20 min with 2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum29.

  3. 3.

    [UVA]: rat’s back every 48 h for 4 weeks was exposed to UVA radiation in increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm230. Doses were almost doubled every 3 exposures, what gives in total 27.25 J/cm2 applied UVA radiation.

  4. 4.

    [UVA + CBD]: topically treated for 20 min with 2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum, which was applied to the back of the animal every 12 h for 4 weeks and then it was removed. Every 48 h, before CBD application, the skin of the back was exposed to the UVA radiation in increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2 every 48 h for 4 weeks, as described for [UVA] group.

  5. 5.

    [UVB]: rat’s back every 48 h for 4 weeks was exposed to UVB radiation in increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm231. Doses were almost doubled every 2 exposures, what gives in total 6 J/cm2 applied UVB radiation.

  6. 6.

    [UVB + CBD]: topically treated for 20 min with 2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum, which was applied to the back of the animal every 12 h for 4 weeks and then it was removed. Every 48 h, before CBD application, the skin of the back was exposed to the UVB radiation in increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2 every 48 h for 4 weeks, as described for [UVB] group.

The skin on rat’s back was irradiated using lamp (Cosmedico, Stuttgart, Germany) with UVA (max. emission peak at 368 nm) or UVB (max. emission peak at 311 nm) emitters (PL-S 9 W; Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) applied in the dermatology for human skin diseases treatment. The spectrum of UV emitters used in the experiments are showed in Supplementary figure S1. The radiation doses used in experiment were selected according to the standard protocols used in the phototherapy of human skin diseases, including psoriasis. To ensure the constant distance (~ 2 cm) between the irradiated skin and lamp the plastic combs were used, what allows to maintain a required dose of radiation over a time and protects against skin overheating.

Due to the potential protective effect of petrolatum against skin drying and pro-inflammatory reactions32,33,34, to minimize the influence of external factors on the metabolic changes in animal skin caused by CBD, all irradiated rats were treated topically with petroleum jelly (with or without CBD) after UV irradiation. For 20 min, which was then removed.

After a 4-week experiment, the animals were anaesthetized using inhaled isoflurane and sacrificed by cardiac excision. During this procedures, the blood from hart were taken into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and centrifuged at 3000 g (4 °C) to obtain the plasma for proteomic analysis. All the methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Samples preparation, electrophoretic separation and protein digestion

The total protein concentration of the plasma samples was measured by Bradford assay35. The volume of plasma containing 30 µg of protein were mixed 1:1 (v:v) with a sample denaturing buffer (Laemmli buffer containing 5% 2-mercaptoethanol) and boiled for 7 min. Next samples were separated using 10% Tris–Glycine SDS-PAGE gels. The gels with separated proteins were fixed in methanol: acetic acid: water (4:1:5; v:v) for 1 h and stained overnight with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. Following washing off, detected bands were cut from the gels, sliced and pulled into 3 sections (Fig. 1, Supplementary figure S2). The proteins in each section were reduced with 10 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol, alkylated by incubation with 50 mM iodoacetamide, and in-gel digested overnight with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The isolated peptide mixture was extracted from the gel, dried, and dissolved in 5% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid.

Figure 1
figure 1

SDS-PAGE separation and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 of plasma proteins from the control rats (CTR) and animals topically treated with cannabidiol (2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum) and/or irradiated with UVA (increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2) or UVB (increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2). (AC) Protein pooling sections for proteomic analyzes.

Proteomic analysis

The final peptide mixture was separated using high-performance liquid chromatography system (Ultimate 3000; Dionex, Idstein, Germany) on a 150 mm × 0.075 mm PepMap RSLC capillary analytical C18 column with 2 µm particle size at a flow rate of 0.300 µL/min. The solvents gradient started at 3 min and increased to 60% eluent B (90% acetonitrile + 0.03% formic acid) for 40 min. Eluent A contained 5% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Eluated peptides were analysed using a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The conditions of the analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for peptide identification have been described in detail previously36.

Protein identification and label-free quantification

The data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Seattle, WA, USA). Protein label-free quantification was performed according to the signal intensities of the precursor ions. For the identification of proteins, the following search parameters were used; peptide mass tolerance set to 10 ppm, MS/MS mass tolerance set to 0.02 Da, up to two missed cleavages allowed, cysteine carbamidomethylation and carboxymethylation, methionine oxidation, as well as 4-HNE—cysteine/lysine/histidine, MDA—lysine, CBD—cysteine set as a dynamic modifications37,38. The levels of 4-HNE/MDA/CBD-protein adducts were estimated based on the peak intensity of peptides modified by 4-HNE. Input data were searched against the UniProtKB-SwissProt database (taxonomy: Rattus norvegicus, release 2021–02).

Statistical analysis

Samples from each experimental group were analyzed in six independent replicates. The results from individual protein label-free quantification were log-transformed and auto-scaled (mean-centered and divided by the standard deviation of each variable) using open-source software MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca)39. The same software was used for biostatistical analysis, including univariate analysis (one-way ANOVA, Fisher’s LSD) and principal component analysis (PCA), heat maps with dendrogram creation and clustering.

Ethics approval

All the procedures and experimental protocols on animals were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments in Olsztyn, Poland (resolution No. 37/2019 of 26.04.2019).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Results

The conducted experiment was aimed at demonstrating the effect of topical CBD treatment on the UV-induced changes in the profiles of plasma of the rats following chronic UVA/UVB irradiation. Despite of the fact that preliminary in gel separation of proteins showed no significant differences in the band profile between examined samples (Fig. 1), the proteomic analysis allowed to determined proteins which expression or structure was affected by UV radiation and protected by CBD. Obtained results indicated 407 proteins detected and label free quantified. The expression of 318 of these proteins showed statistically significant differences between samples (267 proteins in the case of UVA/CBD vs. CTR and 295 proteins in the case of UVB/CBD treatment vs. CTR) (Supplementary table S1). The principal component analysis showed clear differentiation between UVA or UVB irradiated rats and CTR group (Fig. 2A,B). Moreover, the treatment rats with CBD did not significantly affect differentiation between CTR and CBD group, however, in the case of UV irradiated rats CBD meaningly moved the UV + CBD group away from only UVA or UVB irradiated animals (Fig. 2A,B).

Figure 2
figure 2

Principal component analysis (PCA) of plasma proteins from the control rats (CTR) and animals topically treated with cannabidiol (2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum) and/or irradiated with UVA (increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2) (A) or UVB (increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2) (B). ssStatistical analysis were performed using open-source software MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (www.metaboanalyst.ca).

Similar results were observed in the case of dendrograms, where CTR and CBD groups were clustered separately from UV treated groups, while CBD treatment following UV radiation brought the obtained profiles closer to the CTR group (Fig. 3A,B). Also the heatmaps for top 25 proteins most statistically changed according to the ANOVA allowed for visualization the strongest changes induced by chronic UVA or UVB irradiation and topical CBD treatment in the plasma proteom of tested rats (Fig. 3A,B). To the proteins whose expression has been strongly induced by UVA and UVB radiation belonged keratin and protein S100, and CBD partially prevented these changes especially in the case of UVB irradiated rats. Simultaneously, UVA and UVB radiation in a similar level decreased the expression of other mentioned top proteins, including these involved in blood coagulation (plasminogen, hemoglobin, α/δ globin and GTPase-activating protein 18 (ARHGAP18)), integrin signaling pathway (integrins α2/β2, transcription suppressor 1 and integrin-linked protein kinase (ILK)), as well as anti-inflammatory signaling (nuclear factor NFκB inhibitor, phosphoglycerate mutase 2 (PGAM2), protein kinase C (PKC), 14-3-3 protein, phospholipase B, paraoxonase). Moreover, UVA and UVB radiation directly influenced the cells growth regulation by the decreasing level of proteins involved in RNA processing (RNA helicase and proliferation-associated protein 2G4 (PA2G4)), transporting (protein Sec7, retinol-binding protein (RBP1/2) and importin) and protein conformation (stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1) and proline synthetase). CBD treatment following UVA or UVB radiation caused quantitative changes through their additional stimulation or strong protection against them. CBD treatment following UVA significantly prevented UVA-induced reduction in the level of proteins involved in anti-inflammatory and integrin-dependent signaling pathways and additionally decreased expression of the proteins responsible for blood coagulation, RNA processing and protein conformation. At the same time, the effects of CBD on the UVB-treated group were more diverse, but overall, most of these proteins were further reduced by CBD in UVB-irradiated animals (Fig. 3A,B).

Figure 3
figure 3

Dendrograms and heatmap for 25 top-modified ANOVA-selected proteins from plasma of control rats (CTR) and animals topically treated with cannabidiol (2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum) and/or irradiated with UVA (increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2) (A) or UVB (increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2) (B). Statistical analysis were performed using open-source software MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (www.metaboanalyst.ca). Abbreviations, ARHGAP18, Rho GTPase activating protein 18; ILK, integrin-linked kinase; NFKBIL2, NFκB inhibitor; PA2G4, proliferation-associated 2G4; PGAM 2, phosphoglycerate mutase 2; PKC, protein kinase C; RBP, RNA-binding protein; SEC 7, transport protein 7; STIP 1, septin and tuftelin interacting protein.

The effects of UVA and UVB rats skin chronic irradiation most likely caused in animals plasma the oxidative stress manifested by increased level of lipid peroxidation products—protein adducts formation. That was observed as 4-HNE or MDA—proteins adducts formation especially following UVA and UVB irradiation (Fig. 4A). However, CBD treatment was the most effective in decreasing 4-HNE—protein adducts level following UVB irradiation, while this effect was not observed in UVA irradiated group. On the other hand, in the case of MDA—protein adducts, CBD protective action was stronger following UVA irradiation (Fig. 4A). One of the most significantly modified by lipid peroxidation products proteins was albumin (Fig. 4B). UVA and UVB radiation led to the formation 4-HNE-albumin, as well as MDA-albumin adducts, however, the strongest effect was observed in the case of 4-HNE-albumin adducts in plasma of UVB irradiated rats. In addition, UV radiation itself lowers the level of this protein (Fig. 4C), however, in all cases CBD significantly prevented UV induced changes (Fig. 4B,C). Also other proteins were modified by lipid peroxidation products, including: serine/threonine-protein phosphatase and serpin E2 or ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase and macroglobulin A2, which were modified even in 80% of total amount (Fig. 4D,F). For all these proteins CBD treatment prevented these modifications, as well as influenced also total level of mentioned proteins (Fig. 4E,G).

Figure 4
figure 4

The level of lipid peroxidation products—proteins adducts in plasma from the control rats (CTR) and animals topically treated with cannabidiol (2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum) and/or irradiated with UVA (increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2) or UVB (increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2). Individual diagrams show total level of adducts (A), level of albumin and its modifications (B, C), and levels of mostly modified proteins by 4-HNE (D, E) and MDA (F, G). Mean values ± SD of six independent experiments are presented. xStatistically significant differences vs. CTR group, p < 0.05; aStatistically significant differences versus UVA irradiated group, p < 0.05; bStatistically significant differences versus UVB irradiated group, p < 0.05.

CBD skin topical treatment leading to the penetration of CBD into the blood also caused direct modifications to the plasma protein structure by creating CBD adducts (Fig. 5). The main proteins that bind CBD were LIM domain-binding 3, proline-rich protein 30, transcription factor 19, and N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase. Moreover, the level on CBD-protein adducts was dependent on the UV radiation type that animals were exposed to. UVA radiation was conducive for CBD-protein adducts formation stronger than UVB, despite of the fact of different direction of action on the level of total expression of these proteins (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

The level of proteins modified by cannabidiol (CBD) in plasma from the control rats (CTR) and animals topically treated with cannabidiol (2.5 g CBD in 100 g petrolatum) and/or irradiated with UVA (increasing doses from 0.5 to 5 J/cm2) or UVB (increasing doses from 0.02 to 2 J/cm2). Mean values ± SD of six independent experiments are presented. xStatistically significant differences vs. CTR group, p < 0.05; aStatistically significant differences vs. UVA irradiated group, p < 0.05; bStatistically significant differences vs. UVB irradiated group, p < 0.05; *Statistically significant differences vs. CBD treated group, p < 0.05.

Discussion

The harmful impact of UV radiation on skin, as well as all body tissues, including disturbances in redox balance12 and blood pressure disorders15, push people to constantly look for ways to neutralize these effects. An easy and convenient way seems to be the topical skin application of CBD, that is more and more frequently used in a commercial oils/creams for skin care40. CBD has been also used in the treatment of most frequent skin disorders: psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, where it significantly improved both the skin parameters and the systemic symptoms41. On the other hand, many non-controlled use of CBD has been also reported in the case of human skin disease—epidermolysis42 or pain treatment43. Moreover, described self-induced CBD applications can affect in an indefinite way not only on cell metabolism but also the entire human body. The experiments on mouse and rat models showed that topically applied CBD penetrates in to the blood and is transported throughout the bloodstream27,44. Additionally, it has been shown in another animal experiment that spot application of CBD shows even greater effects comparing to its systemic distribution45.

The results of this study indicate appearance of keratin in the plasma of UVA/UVB irradiated animals. Keratin is a protein mainly synthesized by the epithelial cells. Because of that, it usually occurs intracellularly and its release into the blood occurs only upon skin or liver injury46,47. Therefore, keratin presence in plasma is considered even as a marker of the development of diseases such as normoglycaemia48 or Alzheimer’s disease49. In presented experiment UV-induced expression of keratin in plasma might resulting from skin cells damages10, as well as liver metabolism disruption13. However, despite of the source, this protein activates peripheral blood T cells, what induces systemic inflammation50. On the other hand, CBD topical treatment of UVB irradiated rats significantly prevents keratin release to the plasma. CBD protective effect direct on skin cells prevents their apoptosis following UVB irradiation51 and therefore fewer keratin can be released into the plasma. That is consistent with other reports on the anti-inflammatory effect of CBD19 and additionally indicates the new pathway of CBD action. Moreover, UVA and UVB radiation increases the expression of pro-inflammatory protein S100. This molecule exist in the form of the low stable heterodimer S100A8/A9, and both of its components can bind Ca2+ and during inflammation are released to the blood from neutrophils and monocytes to stimulate leukocytes for cytokine secretion52. Increased level of S100 in plasma so far has been believed to be accompanying the melanoma development process especially following skin exposure to the UVB radiation53, however, CBD partially prevents increase in S100 plasma level. Similar CBD action has been also observed in the case of in vitro UVB irradiated keratinocytes54, what significantly contributed to the reduction of the immune response of these skin cells. Simultaneously, UVA and UVB radiation decreased the expression of NFκB inhibitor—NFKBIL2 (IκB-related), a protein responsible for negative regulation of Toll-like receptors activated by NFκB and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) production prevention55. UVA, as well as UVB radiation by decreasing NFKBIL2 level in the plasma of experimental animals induces the pro-inflammatory signaling based on NFκB/TNFα pathway. However, anti-inflammatory action of CBD has been shown that is based on the NFκB as well as TNFα level decreasing23,56. The results of this study indicated that these changes might be dependent on Toll-like receptor inhibition by NFKBIL2, which level is enhanced by CBD in plasma of both not irradiated and UV treated animals. Similar action of CBD has been previously observed in the case of lipopolysaccharide-stressed cells, where CBD concentration dependent increase in other NFκB inhibitor—IκB occurred57.

Rats exposure to the UV radiation causes changes throughout the organism, not only in the context of a pro-inflammatory reaction, but also other biologically important processes. That starts at the signaling level, where UV radiation significantly decreases the expression of many intercellular factors, including 14-3-3 protein and protein kinase C (PKC). 14-3-3 protein has ability to binding other proteins such as kinases, phosphatases, or transmembrane receptors thus additionally increasing the scope of its activities58. On the other hand, 14-3-3 protein inhibits cell cycle progression by arrests cell at G1/S- and G2/M-transition59, therefore its decreased level in plasma by UV radiation is additionally dangerous due to the risk of developing carcinogenic signaling. Also UV decreased PKC expression regulates numerous cellular responses including gene expression, protein secretion, cell proliferation, as well as cell cycle progression. PKC, similarly to 14-3-3 can stopped cells at G1/S- and G2/M-transition, and again the decrease level of this protein in plasma carries the risk of neoplastic processes60. Similar results were observed in UV irradiated fibroblasts61, however, opposite data from UV irradiated keratinocytes, showed that radiation activates PKC for the apoptosis induction in the damaged skin cells62. CBD treatment significantly prevents mentioned changes in the cases of this both mentioned molecules: 14-3-3 protein and PKC, as well as other presented proteins that expressions are decreased by UV radiation. Moreover, CBD can not only enhance the expression of PKC but also activates this enzyme by the direct interaction with serotonin receptor (5-HT1AR)63. Moreover, literature data indicate that cannabinoids significantly arrest cells in G2/M-transition64, which does not rule out a potential role of the 14-3-3 protein or PKC in this regulation.

Chronic UV skin irradiation is such a highly harmful environmental factor that its negative effect is also reflected in the redox status of the whole organism, including the blood. Oxidative stress in the blood leads to increased lipid peroxidation and, consequently to lipid peroxidation products-protein adducts formation, that are most intensive in the case of albumin65. Human albumin is a protein that plays an important role in the physiological transport of many compounds such as free fatty acids, steroids, and some metals and drug metabolites. This protein contains numerous of nucleophilic residues that react with high reactive electrophilic aldehydes, including 4-HNE and MDA65,66. 4-HNE- as well as MDA-albumin adducts has been found in the plasma of patients with? Various diseases, including diabetes, atherosclerosis, or liver diseases67,68,69. In this study, plasma 4-HNE- and MDA–albumin adducts, for the first time, are described as a results of direct skin UV irradiation. Interestingly, less penetrating UVB radiation causes the stronger increase in the formation of lipid peroxidation products-albumin than UVA. This relationship concerns adducts between 4-HNE and albumin. Moreover, albumin is an attractive target for biomarker studies of oxidative stress because it is highly abundant, constituting over half the total serum protein70. As a positive effect of albumin modifications other plasma proteins can be protected from oxidation71, also induced by UV skin irradiation. Obtained data presents that CBD partially prevents 4-HNE and MDA—albumin adducts formation. CBD as an antioxidant molecule can both prevent the generation of reactive electrophiles19, as well as it can reduce the possibility of their reaction with other proteins to form adducts54. Due to that, CBD counteract UV-induced changes in structure of plasma proteins. That concerns not only on albumin, but also on other modified proteins, like serine/threonine-protein phosphatase, serpin E2, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase, and macroglobulin A2, that are founded in this study as the main molecules modified by lipid peroxidation products following UV radiation. As it has been described before this type of protein modifications induce various effects on the biologically important molecules, what often lead to the pro-inflammatory or pro-apoptotic signals generation72. Therefore, the main molecules involved in signal transduction are most exposed to interaction with lipid peroxidation products. That include also proteins from the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation (kinase-phosphatase) system, therein serine/threonine-protein phosphatase, responsible for removal of phosphate groups and regulation cell proliferation, cell differentiation and apoptosis73. So far it has been described that UV radiation and oxidative stress can directly induce phosphatases activity74,75. Moreover, increased level of 4-HNE-modified proteins reduces oxidation of phosphatases and stimulates their activity, in response to the oxidative stress76. Other studies also show that the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation system in plasma under stress conditions can be influenced by lipid peroxidation products—protein adduct formation by 4-HNE binding to the kinases36, what differently affects the activity of these enzymes. Generally, the formation of 4-HNE-kinase adducts only at non-toxic concentrations activate phosphorylation usually triggering the pro-protective signal transmission cascade77. In the case of high 4-HNE-protein adducts concentrations reverse action is expected, what in conjunction with activation phosphatases activation will likely block this signaling pathway. This is particularly important due to the fact that CBD is potent in reducing the level of serine/threonine-protein phosphatase modification, particularly following high-energetic and harmful UVB radiation.

Other plasma protein significantly modified by 4-HNE following animal irradiation is serpin E2, an important protease inhibitor, that take a part in inflammation and coagulation regulation. The level of serpins is up-regulated following UV irradiation highlighting it essential role in the pro-apoptotic signal transduction78. Other study shows that also CBD can enhance serpins expression in macrophages and lung cancer cells79. The biological activity of serpin depends on its conformation, and can be lost due to the modifications of some exposed nucleophilic lysine residues (Lys-11, Lys-114, Lys-125), which were previously found as a target for the attachment of acrolein—another electrophilic aldehyde generated during lipid peroxidation80. Therefore, the lowering level of 4-HNE-serpin E2 adducts by CBD, may indicate its protective role against disturbances in the body's natural defense mechanisms against oxidative stress based on serpins activity. However, the exact mechanism of action remains unclear. Additionally, the coagulation process in rats irradiated with UV is disturbed by the increased level of macroglobulin A2 (A2M), which is an important anti-proteolytic inhibitor of coagulation81. Surprisingly, UV-induced MDA binding to A2M may attenuate the proteinases action82 and favor coagulation processes. CBD significantly reduces both the level of A2M as well as the percent of modified molecules. Other results show that changes in plasma accompanying pathologic conditions, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, also are characterised by decreased level of MDA-A2M adducts, suggesting the organism's natural protective reaction against oxidative stress and inflammatory processes83, that in UV irradiated rats is supported by CBD.

UV radiation leading to the oxidative modifications of proteins, changes their structure so strongly that the process of their degradation is disturbed. That favors the accumulation of dysfunctional molecules, which hinder the normal functioning of the whole organism84. Moreover, UV radiation increases the expression of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase, that, due to its deubiquitinating properties additionally prevents proteasomal digestion of damaged proteins marked for degradation. However, oxidative modifications, which includes MDA–protein adducts formation, have been found as a factors that inhibit deubiquitination processes85. In animals treated with CBD following UVA irradiation a significant decrease in MDA-ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase adducts level is observed, what should be accompanied with high hydrolase activity and lowering the level of ubiquitination, resulting from CBD protection against proteins modification under stress conditions.

Obtained in this study results indicate also the CBD–protein adducts formation with plasma molecules. So far, little work has focused on the direct effects of CBD on the structure and activity of the proteins, however, it has been found to interact with various pathways. Recent publications show, among others, that CBD has significant effect on the cellular antioxidant system: by adducts creation with Keap1, stimulates antioxidant and cytoprotective transcription factor Nrf223 or, on the other hand, by direct binding with GSH or cytochrome P450, CBD inactivate the antioxidant properties of these molecules38. On the other hand, CBD-kinase adducts formation significantly stimulates the activity of AKT and PI3K in mice spinal cord cells86 or human ligament stem cells87. Obtained results indicate that CBD can additionally create adducts with LIM domain-binding 3, cytosolic protein responsible for cytoskeleton organization. However, this protein found in plasma suggests significant cells damage and favors cells adhesion and localization changing, what explains the increase in this protein level in UV irradiated animals. Moreover, LIM domain-binding 3 is a protein that in active form binds kinase C and A88, which, as mention before, similarly to LIM domain-binding 3 also can create adducts with CBD. Therefore, the cytoprotective action of CBD following UV irradiation is observed as a decreased level of LIM domain-binding 3 from damaged cells, as well as high level of adducts with this protein, probably stimulating its activity in cells adhesion.

Another cellular protein, modified by CBD in rats plasma is proline-rich protein 30. It is a molecule strongly connected with signal transduction and cytoskeletal proteins, including its actin‐binding properties, kinase PI3K or calcium channel regulation89. Proline‐rich sequences are commonly found in situations requiring the rapid recruitment or interchange of several proteins, such as during initiation of transcription, signaling cascades, and cytoskeletal rearrangements89. However, in the case of this protein, CBD by adducts formation blocks its domains, leading to its inactivation, thus reducing the importance of this protein in the plasma of animals exposed to UV radiation. On the other hand, CBD also attaches to N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase, a lysosomal enzyme involved in the glycosaminoglycans catabolism in the body. It has been found that N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase activity is involved in the inhibition of heparin-based anti-coagulation90. On the other hand, it is know that UV radiation can induce a coagulation91,92. Unfortunately, there is currently no information on how the formation of adducts with CBD affects the activity of this enzyme, however, other studies show that cannabinoids can increase the activity of other sulfatases93. Modified by CBD is also transcription factor 19, a potential trans-activating factor that could play an important role in the transcription of genes required for the later stages of cell cycle progression94. However, its activity effects and structure modifications, especially in plasma, are not well described, so it cannot be suggested how CBD adducts creation influences its action.

In conclusion, the results of this in vivo study confirm the in vitro results to date, indicating the complementary anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of CBD. Presented results indicate that the mechanism of CBD biological action in vivo includes not only preventing skin cell damage, but also its direct effect on plasma proteins, resulting in the inhibitory effect of CBD on pro-inflammatory signaling throughout the body. In addition, this phytocannabinoid is effective in preventing oxidative stress and oxidative modification of the protein profile and structure. Consequently, CBD may be a compound used to protect the organism against the harmful effects of UV radiation. However, its operation requires careful analysis to ensure that it does not pose a metabolic hazard to other cells or tissues of the animal or human.

Availability of data and material

The MS proteomics data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD026668.

Code availability

2rwnmK3m.

Abbreviations

4-HNE:

4-Hydroxynonenal

A2M:

Macroglobulin A2

AKT:

Protein kinase B

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ARHGAP18:

GTPase-activating protein 18

CBD:

Cannabidiol

CTR:

Control

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ESI:

Electrospray ionization source

GSH:

Glutathione

GSSG:

Glutathione disulfide

ILK:

Integrin-linked protein kinase

IκB:

Inhibitor of nuclear factor κB

LC–MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Lys:

Lysine

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

NFKBIL2:

Nuclear factor of κB-like 2

NFκB:

Nuclear factor κB

PA2G4:

Proliferation-associated protein 2G4

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PGAM2:

Phosphoglycerate mutase 2

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PKC:

Protein kinase C

RBP:

Retinol-binding protein

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

STIP1:

Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor α

UV:

Ultraviolet

References

  1. 1.

    Gonzaga, E. R. Role of UV light in photodamage, skin aging, and skin cancer: Importance of photoprotection. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 10, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.2165/0128071-200910001-00004 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wondrak, G. T., Roberts, M. J., Jacobson, M. K. & Jacobson, E. L. 3-Hydroxypyridine chromophores are endogenous sensitizers of photooxidative stress in human skin cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30009–30020. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404379200 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Slominski, A. T. et al. How UV light touches the brain and endocrine system through skin, and why. Endocrinology 159, 1992–2007. https://doi.org/10.1210/EN.2017-03230 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Slominski, A. et al. Corticotropin releasing hormone and proopiomelanocortin involvement in the cutaneous response to stress. Physiol. Rev. 80, 979–1020. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.979 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Slominski, A. T. et al. Sensing the environment: Regulation of local and global homeostasis by the skin neuroendocrine system. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 212, v–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19683-6_1 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Slominski, A. & Wortsman, J. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr. Rev. 21, 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1210/EDRV.21.5.0410 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Slominski, A. T. et al. Key role of CRF in the skin stress response system. Endocr. Rev. 34, 827–884. https://doi.org/10.1210/ER.2012-1092 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Skobowiat, C. et al. Genetic variation of the cutaneous HPA axis: An analysis of UVB-induced differential responses. Gene 530, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GENE.2013.08.035 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Skobowiat, C., Postlethwaite, A. E. & Slominski, A. T. Skin exposure to ultraviolet B rapidly activates systemic neuroendocrine and immunosuppressive responses. Photochem. Photobiol. 93, 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHP.12642 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gęgotek, A. et al. The cross-talk between electrophiles, antioxidant defence and the endocannabinoid system in fibroblasts and keratinocytes after UVA and UVB irradiation. J. Dermatol. Sci. 81, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.11.005 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Negre-Salvayre, A. et al. Pathological aspects of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic. Res. 44, 1125–1171. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2010.498478 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rajnochová Svobodová, A. et al. Acute exposure to solar simulated ultraviolet radiation affects oxidative stress-related biomarkers in skin, liver and blood of hairless mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 34, 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.34.471 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ferguson, A. L. et al. Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation limits diet-induced weight gain, increases liver triglycerides and prevents the early signs of cardiovascular disease in mice. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 29, 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2019.02.006 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhu, H. et al. Moderate UV exposure enhances learning and memory by promoting a novel glutamate biosynthetic pathway in the brain. Cell 173, 1716-1727.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.014 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, D. et al. UVA irradiation of human skin vasodilates arterial vasculature and lowers blood pressure independently of nitric oxide synthase. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134, 1839–1846. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.27 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Weller, R. B. et al. Does incident solar ultraviolet radiation lower blood pressure?. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e013837. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013837 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Corroon, J. & Felice, J. F. The endocannabinoid system and its modulation by cannabidiol (CBD). Altern. Ther. Health Med. 25, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-015-0374-6 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Spanagel, R. Cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system in reward processing and addiction: From mechanisms to interventions. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 22, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.3/RSPANAGEL (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Atalay, S., Jarocka-Karpowicz, I. & Skrzydlewska, E. Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of cannabidiol. Antioxidants 9, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010021 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Burstein, S. Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: A review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 23, 1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.01.059 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gęgotek, A., Atalay, S., Domingues, P. & Skrzydlewska, E. The Differences in the proteome profile of cannabidiol-treated skin fibroblasts following UVA or UVB irradiation in 2D and 3D cell cultures. Cells 8, 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8090995 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Atalay, S., Dobrzyńska, I., Gęgotek, A. & Skrzydlewska, E. Cannabidiol protects keratinocyte cell membranes following exposure to UVB and hydrogen peroxide. Redox Biol. 36, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101613 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jastrząb, A., Gęgotek, A. & Skrzydlewska, E. Cannabidiol regulates the expression of keratinocyte proteins involved in the inflammation process through transcriptional regulation. Cells 8, 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080827 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jhawar, N., Schoenberg, E., Wang, J. V. & Saedi, N. The growing trend of cannabidiol in skincare products. Clin. Dermatol. 37, 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.11.002 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Seltzer, E. S. et al. Cannabidiol (CBD) as a promising anti-cancer drug. Cancers (Basel) 12, 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113203 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mechoulam, R., Parker, L. A. & Gallily, R. Cannabidiol: An overview of some pharmacological aspects. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 42, 11S-19S. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.2002.tb05998.x (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Biernacki, M. et al. Oxidative stress and its consequences in the blood of rats irradiated with UV: Protective effect of cannabidiol. Antioxidants 10, 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060821 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Carter, R. L. & Lipman, N. S. Feed and bedding. In Management of Animal Care and Use Programs in Research, Education, and Testing (eds Weichbrod, R. H. et al.) 639–654 (CRC Press, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gonzalez-Cuevas, G. et al. Unique treatment potential of cannabidiol for the prevention of relapse to drug use: Preclinical proof of principle. Neuropsychopharmacology 43, 2036–2045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0050-8 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hönigsmann, H. Phototherapy for psoriasis. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 26, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00828.x (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brockow, T. et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of low concentrated saline spa water baths followed by ultraviolet B (UVB) compared to UVB only in moderate to severe psoriasis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 21, 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02152.x (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kligman, L. & Kligman, A. Petrolatum and other hydrophobic emollients reduce UVB-induced damage. J. Dermatol. Treat. 3, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09546639209092750 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fetil, E. et al. Effects of some emollients on the transmission of ultraviolet. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 22, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0781.2006.00221.X (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Boyvat, A., Erdi, H., Birol, A. & Gůrgey, E. Interaction of commonly used emollients with photochemotherapy. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 16, 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0781.2000.160402.X (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bradford, M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999 (1976).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gęgotek, A. et al. Proteomic plasma profile of psoriatic patients. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 155, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.068 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Domingues M, Fedorova M, Domingues P (2015) Mass spectrometry detection of protein modification by cross-reaction with lipid peroxidation products. React Oxyg Species, Lipid Peroxidation Protein Oxid 61–86

  38. 38.

    Bornheim, L. M. & Grillo, M. P. Characterization of cytochrome P450 3a inactivation by cannabidiol: Possible involvement of cannabidiol-hydroxyquinone as a P450 inactivator. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11, 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx9800598 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chong, J., Wishart, D. S. & Xia, J. Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 68, e86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.86 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, J. V., Shah, S., Albornoz, C. A. & Saedi, N. Consumer interest in topical cannabidiol (CBD): An examination of online search trends from 2015–2019. Clin. Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.11.007 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Palmieri, B., Laurino, C. & Vadalà, M. A therapeutic effect of CBD-enriched ointment in inflammatory skin diseases and cutaneous scars. Clin. Ter. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2019 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chelliah, M. P., Zinn, Z., Khuu, P. & Teng, J. M. C. Self-initiated use of topical cannabidiol oil for epidermolysis bullosa. Pediatr. Dermatol. 35, e224–e227. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.13545 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xu, D. H., Cullen, B. D., Tang, M. & Fang, Y. The effectiveness of topical cannabidiol oil in symptomatic relief of peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 21, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201020666191202111534 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Giacoppo, S. et al. A new formulation of cannabidiol in cream shows therapeutic effects in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 23, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-015-0131-8 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schicho, R. & Storr, M. Topical and systemic cannabidiol improves trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid colitis in mice. Pharmacology 89, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336871 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Omary, M. B., Ku, N. O., Strnad, P. & Hanada, S. Toward unraveling the complexity of simple epithelial keratins in human disease. J. Clin. Investig. 119, 1794–1805. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI37762 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Strnad, P., Stumptner, C., Zatloukal, K. & Denk, H. Intermediate filament cytoskeleton of the liver in health and disease. Histochem. Cell Biol. 129, 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0431-x (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Alam, C. M. et al. Keratin 8 modulates b-cell stress responses and normoglycaemia. J. Cell Sci. 126, 5635–5644. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.132795 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Richens, J. L. et al. Rationalising the role of Keratin 9 as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22962 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Johnston, A. et al. Peripheral blood T cell responses to keratin peptides that share sequences with streptococcal M proteins are largely restricted to skin-homing CD8 + T cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 138, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.00600.x (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Atalay, S. et al. Therapeutic application of cannabidiol on UVA and UVB irradiated rat skin. A proteomic study. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 192, 113656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113656 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xia, C. et al. S100 proteins as an important regulator of macrophage inflammation. Front. Immunol. 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01908 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Beyeler, M. et al. Detection of melanoma relapse: First comparative analysis on imaging techniques versus S100 protein. Dermatology 213, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095034 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Atalay, S., Gęgotek, A. & Skrzydlewska, E. Protective effects of cannabidiol on the membrane proteome of UVB-irradiated keratinocytes. Antioxidants 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030402 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Chapman, S. J. et al. Common NFKBIL2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to pneumococcal disease: A genetic association study. Crit. Care 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9377 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Silva, R. L. et al. DMH-CBD, a cannabidiol analog with reduced cytotoxicity, inhibits TNF production by targeting NF-kB activity dependent on A 2A receptor. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 368, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2019.02.011 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kozela, E. et al. Cannabinoids Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol differentially inhibit the lipopolysaccharide-activated NF-κB and interferon-β/STAT proinflammatory pathways in BV-2 microglial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 1616–1626. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.069294 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Fu, H., Subramanian, R. R. & Masters, S. C. 14-3-3 proteins: structure, function, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 617–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.617 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hermeking, H. & Benzinger, A. 14-3-3 proteins in cell cycle regulation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16, 183–192 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Black, J. D. Protein kinase C-mediated regulation of the cell cycle. Front. Biosci. 5, d406. https://doi.org/10.2741/black (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    de Jager, T. L., Cockrell, A. E. & Du Plessis, S. S. Ultraviolet light induced generation of reactive oxygen species. In Advances in experimental medicine and biology 15–23 (Springer, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    D’Costa, A. M. & Denning, M. F. A caspase-resistant mutant of PKC-δ protects keratinocytes from UV-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 12, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401558 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Jurkus, R. et al. Cannabidiol regulation of learned fear: Implications for treating anxiety-related disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 7, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00454 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jung, H. W., Park, I. & Ghil, S. Cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits cell cycle progression by modulating 14-3-3β. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 19, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-014-0200-x (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Houglum, K., Filip, M., Witztum, J. L. & Chojkier, M. Malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal protein adducts in plasma and liver of rats with iron overload. J. Clin. Investig. 86, 1991–1998. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114934 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ishii, T. et al. Site-specific modification of positively-charged surfaces on human serum albumin by malondialdehyde. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 371, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.140 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Toyokuni, S. et al. Serum 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-modified albumin is elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Antioxidants Redox Signal 2, 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2000.2.4-681 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Duryee, M. J. et al. Malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adduct is the dominant epitope after MDA modification of proteins in atherosclerosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 49, 1480–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.08.001 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mottaran, E. et al. Lipid peroxidation contributes to immune reactions associated with alcoholic liver disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 32, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00757-2 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Aldini, G., Orioli, M. & Carini, M. α, β-Unsaturated aldehydes adducts to actin and albumin as potential biomarkers of carbonylation damage. Redox Rep. 12, 20–25 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Roche, M. et al. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Lett. 582, 1783–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.057 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gęgotek, A. & Skrzydlewska, E. Biological effect of protein modifications by lipid peroxidation products. Chem. Phys. Lipids 221, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2019.03.011 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wera, S. & Hemmings, B. A. Serine/threonine protein phosphatases. Biochem. J. 311, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3110017 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    López-Camarillo, C. et al. Protein kinases and transcription factors activation in response to UV-radiation of skin: Implications for carcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 142–172. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13010142 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Morita, K. I. et al. Negative feedback regulation of ASK1 by protein phosphatase 5 (PP5) in response to oxidative stress. EMBO J. 20, 6028–6036. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.21.6028 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Di Domenico, F. et al. Restoration of aberrant mTOR signaling by intranasal rapamycin reduces oxidative damage: Focus on HNE-modified proteins in a mouse model of down syndrome. Redox Biol. 23, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101162 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Łuczaj, W., Gęgotek, A. & Skrzydlewska, E. Antioxidants and HNE in redox homeostasis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 111, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.029 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Katagiri, C. et al. Up-regulation of serpin SCCA1 is associated with epidermal barrier disruption. J. Dermatol. Sci. 57, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.09.004 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Muthumalage, T. & Rahman, I. Cannabidiol differentially regulates basal and LPS-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages, lung epithelial cells, and fibroblasts. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 382, 114713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2019.114713 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Aldini, G., Orioli, M. & Carini, M. Protein modification by acrolein: Relevance to pathological conditions and inhibition by aldehyde sequestering agents. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 55, 1301–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201100182 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Armstrong, P. B. Role of α 2-macroglobulin in the immune responses of invertebrates. JAMA Dermatol. 153, 956. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2103 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kaur, I. & Katyal, A. Modification of mouse A2M B (620–792) and A2M N (168–230) by malondialdehyde and acetaldehyde attenuates the proteinase and TGF-β1 binding ability of A2MB. FEBS Lett. 585, 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.02.008 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Liao, C. C. et al. Isotypes of autoantibodies against differentially expressed novel malondialdehyde-modified peptide adducts in serum of Taiwanese women with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Proteomics 170, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.08.012 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kastle, M. & Grune, T. Protein oxidative modification in the aging organism and the role of the ubiquitin proteasomal system. Curr. Pharm. Des. 17, 4007–4022. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211798764898 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Choi, J. et al. Oxidative modifications and down-regulation of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 associated with idiopathic Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 13256–13264. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M314124200 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Giacoppo, S. et al. Target regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway by cannabidiol in treatment of experimental multiple sclerosis. Fitoterapia 116, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2016.11.010 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lanza Cariccio, V. et al. Treatment of periodontal ligament stem cells with MOR and CBD promotes cell survival and neuronal differentiation via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082341 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Yamashita, Y. et al. LDB3 splicing abnormalities are specific to skeletal muscles of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and alter its PKC binding affinity. Neurobiol. Dis. 69, 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.05.026 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Kay, B. K., Williamson, M. P. & Sudol, M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 14, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.14.2.231 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zhou, X., Li, L., Linhardt, R. J. & Liu, J. Neutralizing the anticoagulant activity of ultra-low-molecular-weight heparins using N-acetylglucosamine 6-sulfatase. FEBS J. 280, 2523–2532. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12169 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Singh, Y. et al. Photochemical treatment of plasma with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light inactivates pathogens while retaining coagulation function. Transfusion 46, 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00867.x (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Roitman, E. V., Azizova, O. A., Morozov, Y. A. & Aseichev, A. V. Effect of oxidized fibrinogens on blood coagulation. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 138, 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02694170 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Moore, C. et al. Detection of conjugated 11-nor-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in oral fluid. J. Anal. Toxicol. 31, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/31.4.187 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Mondal, P. et al. TCF19 promotes cell proliferation through binding to the histone H3K4me3 mark. Biochemistry 59, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00771 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.A., co-author of the work, was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) and by the project which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 754432 and the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, from financial resources for science in 2018-2023 granted for the implementation of an international co-financed project.

Funding

This study was financed by the National Science Centre Poland (NCN) grant no. 2016/23/B/NZ7/02350.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: S.E.; Methodology: G.A.; Formal analysis and investigation: G.A., A.S.; Writing—original draft preparation: G.A.; Writing—review and editing: G.A., S. E.; Funding acquisition: S.E.; Supervision: S.E.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elżbieta Skrzydlewska.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gęgotek, A., Atalay, S. & Skrzydlewska, E. UV induced changes in proteome of rats plasma are reversed by dermally applied cannabidiol. Sci Rep 11, 20666 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00134-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00134-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing