Abstract
One of the challenges of radiation oncology in the era of personalized medicine is identification of biomarkers associated with individual radiosensitivity. The aim of research was to evaluate the possible clinical value of the associations between clinical, physical, and biological factors, and risk for development of acute radiotoxicity in patients with prostate cancer. The study involved forty four patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ and TGF-β1 were assessed before radiotherapy, after 5th, 15th and 25th radiotherapy fractions, at the end, and 1 month after the end of radiotherapy. Cytokine gene expression was determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The univariate analysis of circulating cytokine levels during radiotherapy showed that increased serum concentrations of IL-6 were significantly associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased level of IL-6 during the radiotherapy was significantly associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity across treatment. TGF-β expression levels significantly decreased during course of radiotherapy. Research indicates that changes in circulating cytokine levels might be important parameter of radiotoxicity in patients with prostate cancer. These findings suggest that future studies based on multi-parameter examination are necessary for prediction of individual radiosensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In the era of personalized medicine, radiotherapy aims to permanently control a primary malignant tumor and regional lymph node metastases and thus avoiding normal tissue toxicity. Between 5% and 10% of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy develop severe side effects which may influence the response to radiotherapy and patients’ quality of life1,2. Although efforts are constantly made to improve radiation therapy techniques, dose delivery, and optimization of treatment regimens further understanding of individual biological differences in patients is needed for development of personalized radiotherapy3. There is a considerable interest in identifying biomarkers associated with patient's individual radiosensitivity. According to the literature data Rubin et al. were among the pioneers in the field of radiation-induced toxicity in association with cytokine level4. Cytokine expression is associated with radiation-related tissue damage and inflammation, and may serve as an indicator of cell and tissue toxicity during prostate cancer radiotherapy5,6. Exposure to radiation initiates a programmed cellular response to promote tissue repair, which involves the induction and regulation of proinflammatory cytokines. Inflammation is thought to play a key role in the response of malignant tumors to radiotherapy. Previously published studies indicate an increase in circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines during radiotherapy, such as IFN-ɣ, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-47,8. Thus Stenmark et al. suggested that assessment of cytokines IL-8 and TGF-β in combination with dose parameters may be useful for prediction of radiation–induced lung toxicity2. Furthermore, it has been shown that there is a difference in the level of cytokines in patients with prostate cancer compared with patients with benign lesions and healthy individuals, as well as changes after radiotherapy and/or androgen therapy3,9. Changes in the level of inflammatory biomarkers have also been shown to be positively correlated with fatigue symptoms, as well as with acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity5,10. Radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer causes inflammation leading to an increase in the circulating levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and TGF-β8. The study by Christensen et al.5 showed significant increases in serum levels of IFN-γ and IL-6 during radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. The elevated levels of IL-1 and IL-2 were associated with the risk of genitourinary and gastrointestinal radiotoxicity development5.
Changes in levels of proinflammatory cytokines have been associated not only with radiation-induced toxicity, but also with tumor response to radiotherapy. It has been found that an increase in IL-6 levels contributes to more aggressive tumor growth and resistance to treatment. The therapeutic modulation of IL-6 could increase the sensitivity of malignant tumors to radiotherapy11. An increase in the percentage of regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) occurs in patients receiving radiotherapy, in various tumors, which is associated with poor therapeutic response11,12. The radiotherapy response was inversely correlated with cytokine expression (TGF-β) and the level of Tregs in a mouse model13. Likewise, surgery has been shown to lead to increased expression of cytokines similar to those found in the inflammatory response of gastrointestinal mucosa after radiotherapy5,14,15,16. However, the complex role of proinflammatory cytokines in radiation therapy-related toxicity has not yet been completely elucidated.
The aim of the present study was to examine the potential clinical significance of the associations between clinical, physical, and multiple biological parameters from three different levels, which derived from the previous study which investigated association only between clinico-pathological and physical parameters and potential risk for development of acute radiotoxicity17.
The longitudinal cytokine profiles in serum and gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells for the prediction of individual sensitivity to radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer in addition, the changes in the percentage of peripheral white blood cell subpopulations in these patients throughout the course of radiation therapy were assessed, as well. This integrated multi-level approach provides a better insight into biological effects of fractionated radiotherapy in the terms of more precise prediction of acute radiotoxicity. The examined six time points represent the resultant of cumulative effect of radiation during the therapy.
Results
Patients characteristics and radiation-induced toxicity
The characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1. Patient age ranged from 52 to 81 years, with a mean age of 69.2 years ± 7.1. Among examined patients 10 patients (21.3%) had diabetes mellitus type 2 (non-insulin dependent), 23 patients (48.9%) were active smokers during radiotherapy, 19 patients (40.4%) had chronic hypertension. Median Gleason score (GS) was 7 (min 6, max 9). Low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer had 3 patients (8.3%), 14 patients (38.9%) and 19 patients (52.8%) respectively. For the whole group of patients, the initial level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood before making clinical diagnosis ranged from 4.63 ng/mL to 57 ng/mL (median value was 14.30 ng/mL). Definitive radiotherapy was performed in 21 patients (47.7%). Postoperative radiotherapy was performed in 23 patients (52.3%); in 6/23 patients radiotherapy was adjuvant, while in 17/23 patients radiotherapy was salvage. Residual microscopic disease after radical prostatectomy was present in 9 out of 23 patients. After the 25th fraction of radiotherapy, grade 1 was the most common acute genitourinary radiotoxicity with a smaller fraction of patients showing grade 2 and 3 (Fig. 1).
Changes in serum cytokine levels
To investigate whether changes in cytokine profiles correlate with radiation-induced acute genitourinary toxicity, the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ and TGF-β1 were measured in serum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy before treatment initiation, after 5th, 15th and 25th radiotherapy fractions, at the end of radiotherapy after last fraction, and 1 month after the end of radiotherapy.
The univariate analysis of circulating cytokine levels showed that the concentrations of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TGF-β1 in sera of patients with prostate cancer tended to increase, but not statistically significant during course of radiotherapy (Table 2). Increased serum concentrations of IL-6 were significantly associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity (b = 0.018; p = 0.039). The trend for an association between increased concentrations of IL-2 and higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity (b = 0.018; p = 0.081) was observed.
Multivariate multilevel ordinal regression analysis was used to determine whether changes in percentage of circulating lymphocytes and concentrations of IL-2 and IL-6 levels in sera of patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy predicted changes in acute genitourinary toxicity over time. This analysis showed that decreased percentage of lymphocytes during time was significantly associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity (b = − 0.013, p = 0.025, Table 3). Considering the changes in cytokine profiles, increased level of IL-6 during the course of radiotherapy was significantly associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity across treatment (b = 0.017, p = 0.046, Table 3). In addition, the increased level of IL-2 was associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity across treatment, although this association did not reach statistical significance (b = 0.020, p = 0.062, Table 3).
This finding for IL-2 might be attributed to the relatively small number of tested patients and/or to low toxicity grades during the course of radiotherapy observed in the group of analyzed patients. Thus seven patients had toxicity grades 2 and 3 after the 25th radiotherapy fraction, while 8 patients had toxicity grades 2 and 3 at the end of radiation therapy.
The possible differences in temporal profiles of circulating cytokines and their association with acute genitourinary toxicity were examined between patients treated with definitive radiotherapy who had intact prostate and patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy who had prostatectomy. According to the mixed effect model that analyses each time point for each individual, levels of IL-6 and IFN-γ were significantly higher in the subgroup of patients treated with definitive radiotherapy than in the subgroup of patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.001 and p = 0.020, respectively, Supplementary Table 1).
The univariate analysis of the percentage of leukocyte or lymphocyte subpopulations in patients before radiotherapy, during the course of radiotherapy, and one month after end of radiotherapy is presented in Supplementary Table 2.
Cytokine gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
Firstly, we compared pre-treatment cytokine gene expression levels with levels measured after the last fraction of radiotherapy. TGF-β gene expression levels significantly decreased during radiotherapy (p = 0.043, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, Fig. 2, Table 4) while IL-6 levels showed a non-significant trend towards lower (p = 0.075, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, Table 4, Fig. 2).
Secondly, we examined correlations between gene expression measured in PBMCs and protein levels measured in sera of matched patients, and detected no significant correlations in none of the compared groups (Table 5).
Correlations between lymphocyte subsets and gene expression levels of cytokines
Correlation between immunophenotype (lymphocyte subsets) and gene expression levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, and TGF-β at pre-treatment time point and after the last fraction of radiotherapy showed a significant negative correlation between IL-6 and Foxp3+ (rho = − 0.580, p = 0.048, Table 6) or CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ (rho = − 0.578, p = 0.049, Table 6) after the last fraction of radiotherapy. For the level of IFN-γ gene expression, a significant negative correlation was found with the percentage of Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ cells in PBL at pre-treatment time point and after the last fraction of radiotherapy (rho = 0.491, p = 0.053; rho = − 0.660, p = 0.002, respectively, Table 6). After the last fraction of radiotherapy the level of IFN-γ gene transcription shows significant negative correlation with the percentage of Foxp3+ (rho = − 0.495, p = 0.027, Table 6) and CD4+Foxp3+ (rho = − 0.685, p < 0.001, Table 6) cells in PBL. For the level of expression of TGF-β gene we found significant positive correlation with the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Foxp3 transcription factor in PBL after the last fraction of radiotherapy (rho = 0.463, p = 0.026, Table 6).
Discussion
Many studies indicate that the assessment of temporal profiles of circulating cytokine levels in patients undergoing radiotherapy could be a valuable approach for elucidation of their involvement in development of acute and late toxicity caused by radiological treatment as well as for monitoring radiotherapy response. The longitudinal examination of circulating cytokine profiles in our group of patients with prostate cancer treated with conventionally fractionated conformal radiotherapy showed that increased levels of IL-2 and IL-6 during the treatment course were associated with higher grade of acute genitourinary toxicity. Our finding indicates that circulating IL-6 may be associated with acute radiation toxicity.
The results from a similar longitudinal study of cytokine expression patterns suggested that serum levels of IL-1, IL-2, IL-6 and IFN-γ in patients with prostate cancer during intensity-modulated radiotherapy may be predictive for acute radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity5. The changes in IL-2, IL-6 and IFN-γ over baseline were associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity, while the changes in IL-1 and IFN-γ were associated with increased genitourinary toxicity5. Although Christensen et al.5 found that circulating IL-6 was significantly elevated in patients with prostate cancer during radiotherapy, this increase of IL-6 level was not associated with acute genitourinary toxicity as it was observed in our study. Differences between those two studies might be the consequence of the fact that they have used IMRT, while we used 3D conformal radiotherapy, and because of individual differences among patients and observed time points. The results of prospective, longitudinal, phase II study showed that the serum levels of IL-6 tended to increase in patients with early stage prostate cancer during external beam radiotherapy18. The observed differences in temporal patterns of cytokine expression and their relationship with acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients between different studies might be attributed to differences in radiotherapy modalities, dose and volume of the irradiated tissue, in addition to differences in individual patient’s response to radiotherapy. It has been suggested that various biological factors may affect radiation – induced inflammatory response and cytokine signatures, such as genetic and epigenetic factors, pathohistological and molecular characteristics of the malignant tumors, tumor microenvironment, patient’s general health condition in addition to radiation therapy dose and volume of the irradiated tissue6,19,20. The cytokine IL-6 has been suggested as one of the most promising immunological markers that might be useful as additional factor for prediction of radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity6,19,21, not only for prostate cancer, but also for other types of cancer. The research conducted by Siva et al.22 reported that the early alterations in plasma IL-6 concentrations had been related with higher grade lung toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy22.
Evaluation of possible prostate-cancer specific cytokine signatures in our group of patients showed significantly higher circulating levels of IL-6 and IFN-γ in subgroup of patients receiving definitive radiotherapy in comparison with subgroup of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy, which might be the consequence of higher maximal dose (72 Gy definitive radiotherapy group, and 66 Gy dose for postoperative and salvage radiotherapy group), or the consequences of irradiated volumes, that differed among groups, or the result of interplay between various factors such as presence of prostate and irradiation.
This finding for IL-6 was expected since prostate cancer cells produce this pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the inflammatory response to ionizing radiation6,23. Tazaki et al.24 reported increased serum level of IFN-γ in patients with prostate carcinoma24.
There is growing evidence that PBMCs are capable of releasing a biologically active secretome25. It is a well-known fact that the first lines of response to irradiation are cells of the immune system. Helper T lymphocytes CD4+ T (Th) are extremely radiosensitive cell population26. TGF-β regulates differentiation, immune response, and development of T cells and regulates formation of Foxp3+ regulatory T and inflammatory T helper Th17 cells27.
In our research we have measured systemic cytokine gene expression profile in PBMC of the same patients that we measured sera levels. We did not find any significant correlation between TGF-β, INF-ɣ, and IL-6 gene-protein levels from PBMCs and serum, respectively, probably due to a great complexity of molecular interactions of the cytokine secretome, including miRNA-mRNA interaction and two models-translational repression, RNA decay, or combined effect28. Secondly, different cell subtypes such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, etc. produce cytokines, so sera contain the complete cytokine secretome, unlike PBMCs.
According to our results, TGF-β and IL-6 levels in PBMCs decreased during the course of radiotherapy compared with baseline. Stenmark et al.2 showed radiation-induced increase of plasma levels of TGF-β and IL-6 in lung cancer patients. Bouquet et al. have shown that TGF-β inhibition increases radiosensitivity of breast tumor cells29. IL-6 level decrease is associated with increased sensitivity to radiotherapy29 and with radiotoxicity. Lowering of TGF-β might be associated with increased radiosensitivity after the last fraction of radiotherapy.
Lymphocytes are generally regarded as radiosensitive and indeed the overall percentage of circulating lymphocytes in peripheral blood decreased during the course of radiotherapy. However, in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy before treatment initiation, there was no significant effect on the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, Tregs, NK or NKT cell subsets at the end of radiotherapy. Numerous studies have shown that Tregs contribute to development and progression of various malignant tumors. However, it has been shown that radiotherapy inhibits apoptosis of Tregs and thereby increases the production of Tregs and also the recruitment of Tregs to local tumor microenvironment30. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in the regulation of the immune response, inflammation and hematopoeisis. IL-6 can be detected in the serum, although baseline levels are low in the absence of inflammation. IL-6 is also involved in regulation of the balance between two T cell subsets: Tregs and Th17, which have opposing functions in the control of inflammation31. In this study there is a negative correlation between the level of IL-6 gene expression and the percentage of Tregs in PB in patients with prostate cancer which is the most prominent after last fraction of radiotherapy. These findings are in agreement with well-established role of IL-6 in downregulation of the expression of Foxp3 transcription factor that represents the lineage specific marker of Tregs and therefore IL-6 inhibits differentiation of Tregs32,33. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have the role to suppress immune response maintaining homeostasis and self-tolerance. Therefore, by various mechanisms these cells suppress the immunity to infection and tumors. In this study we found the negative correlation between the percentage of Tregs and IFN-γ gene level, especially after last fraction of radiotherapy. It has been shown that Tregs selectively reduce the transcriptional level of IFN-γ without blocking the expression of its Tbet transcription factor. In addition, Treg-mediated blockade of IFN-γ is dependent on Treg-derived IL-10 immunosuppressive cytokine34. Tregs are the most important producers of TGF-β. In this study there is significant positive correlation between the MFI of Foxp3 transcription factor in PBL and TGF-β gene transcription after the last fraction of radiotherapy. This cytokine released after radiotherapy displays protumorogenic and prometastatic role in some tumors35.
Conclusion
Our study shows that changes in circulating cytokine levels during the course of radiation therapy rather than absolute levels might be important parameters of radiotoxicity. The levels of IL-6 significantly changes during radiotherapy, and is associated with the time of measurement and with the presence of prostate and radiotherapy type, IL-2 levels change during the course of radiotherapy independently of the presence of prostate, while changes in INF-ɣ depend on the presence of prostate and radiotherapy type. Our findings point out that future studies should be designed with more levels of patients subgrouping and stratification according to type of radiation treatment and radiation schedules in order to lower the influence of physical and biological factors. The future of test development for prediction of individual radiosensitivity might be based on determination of cytokine levels changes at specific time points during course of radiotherapy which is only a part of the complex multifactorial puzzle influencing the radiotoxicity.
Methods
Patients
Forty four patients who had a histologically confirmed localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) were treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) at the Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia from January 2016 to August 2017 with definitive (in 21 patients) or postoperative (23 patients) radiotherapy without previous hormonal therapy. All patients had Karnofsky index (KI) ≥ 80. The details of the study were explained to the patients and informed consent forms were signed by the participants. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia (approval No3348/1–01). The study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Acute radiotoxicity was evaluated according to RTOG/EORTC (Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria) modified by Peeters36, as well in our previous study17. According to Peeters and coworkers, side-effects occurring within 120 days from the start of radiotherapy were considered as acute radiation morbidity. Late toxicity was scored from 120 days after the start of treatment any times. All clinical data, and blood samples, were prospectively collected. Serum and PBMC samples were obtained from all patients who were to participate in the studies. The radiation oncologist recorded baseline symptoms and acute symptoms during radiotherapy and at first control (30 days after the end of radiotherapy). Exclusion criteria were as follows: chronic infective diseases, neoadjuvant or concomitant hormonal therapy, the presence of enlarged lymph nodes (N1 stage) detected by imaging methods, the presence of distant metastasis (M1 stage) detected by imaging techniques, Karnofsky index < 80, and previous pelvic irradiation.
Treatment regimen
3DCRT was performed according to the protocol of the Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, partly described in our previous published article17. Patients treated with definitive radiotherapy received irradiation to different volumes according to the estimated risk of seminal vesicle (SV) involvement, and lymph node involvement according to the Roach formula. Thus patients were allocated to one of the following three groups: (1) prostate-only group (P) if the risk for SV involvement was < 15%; (2) prostate and seminal vesicle group (P + SV), if the risk SV involvement was ≥ 15%; (3) whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) group if the risk for lymph node involvement was ≥ 15%. Clinical target volume (CTV) and Planning target volume (PTV) were used as standardized nomenclature according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements recommendations ICRU 50 and ICRU 6237,38. CTV included the whole prostate. CTV1 included whole prostate with entire seminal vesicle. CTV lnn encompassed the lymph node below of bifurcation of a. iliaca communis. The planning target volumes (PTV and PTV1) included 10 mm margins around the CTV or CTV1 and CTV lnn except the posterior margin which was reduced to 8 mm. PTV2 and PTV3 included margins around CTV. Margins for PTV2 and PTV3 were reduced to 5 mm except the posterior margin which was further reduced to 0 mm.
Patients were irradiated with a conventional fractionation regime: 2 Gy daily, 5 days weekly.
The prescribed dose to the ICRU reference volume to cover PTV, in the P only group, was 72 Gy. In the second group the prescribed dose to cover PTV1 was 66 Gy and to cover PTV2 was 6 Gy. In third group prescribed dose were 44 Gy for PTV1, 22 Gy for PTV2 and 6 Gy for PTV3.
All patients treated with definitive radiotherapy received 72 Gy in 36 fractions.
Patients who were irradiated after radical prostatectomy had one or two dose volume groups. If pN status was N0 they received 66 Gy to the PTV (prostate bed + /-SV). If pN status was Nx or N1 they received 44 Gy to PTV1 (cover pelvic lymph node and the prostate + /- SV bed) followed by 22 Gy to PTV2 (cover the prostate + /- SV bed). The SV bed was irradiated in patients with stage pT3b in the pathological report. All patients treated with postoperative or salvage radiotherapy received 66 Gy in 33 fractions.
Determination of serum cytokine concentrations
The concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ and TGF-β1 in the sera of patients with prostate cancer were determined by commercial uncoated ELISA kits, according to manufacturer instructions (Invitrogen). The concentrations of cytokines were determined before radiotherapy, after 5th, 15th and 25th radiotherapy fractions, at the end of radiotherapy, and 1 month after the end of radiotherapy.
In brief, ELISA plates were coated with appropriate capture antibodies in coating buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The plates were washed and blocked with ELISA/ELISASPOT Diluent. After 1 h incubation the plates were washed and serum samples and standards were added to the wells. The plates were incubated overnight at 4 °C for maximum sensitivity. After washing and aspiration, detection antibody solution was added to each well and plates were incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, the plates were washed and aspirated; avidin-HRP solution was added to the wells and incubated for 30 min. The plates were washed and (3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine) TMB solution was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and the enzymatic reaction was terminated by adding stop solution. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using Multiskan EX Thermo Labsystems plate reader. The serum samples were run in duplicate.
Cytokine gene expression analysis
Cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was examined at two time points: (1) at baseline (before radiotherapy) and (2) after the last fraction of radiotherapy. Total RNA from PBMCs was extracted with TRI Reagent (Sigma Aldrich). RNA was quantified on Biospec-nano (Shimadzu Biotech, Japan). Reverse transcription reaction preceded real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) reaction, performed with High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). The cDNA amplification reaction included primers against INF-ɣ (Hs00989291_m1), IL-6 (Hs00174131_m1), and TGF-β (Hs00998133_m1) and Taqman2xUniversal PCR Master Mix, No Amperase UNG (Applied Biosystems, by Life Technologies, Warrington, UK). As endogenous control for data normalization, GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1) was used. Gene expression is presented in relative quantity (RQ) units using the comparative 2-ΔΔCt method on 7500 System SDS software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA).
Flow cytometry
Direct immunofluorescence staining was performed on peripheral blood (PB) using specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and isotype-matched mAbs. Briefly, 50 μL of PB was incubated with 2.5 μL of appropriate monoclonal antibody combination for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. According to manufacturer’s protocol (Becton Dickinson), samples were lysed with 1X FACS Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson), washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde solution prior to acquisition. Surface marker expression was quantified on FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, USA). A total of 10 000—50 000 gated events verified as peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), according to both, their physical characteristics forward scatter characteristics (FSC) and side scatter characteristics (SSC) were collected per sample and analyzed using CellQUEST software.
Within the lymphocyte gate we analyzed the percentage of CD3 (FITC-conjugated, Becton Dickinson R&D) and CD4 (PerCP-conjugated, Becton Dickinson) positive helper T cells and CD8 (PE-conjugated, Becton Dickinson), CD3 negative CD16CD56 positive (CD3-FITC-conjugated, CD16CD56-PE-conjugated Becton Dickinson) cells NK cells.
Intracellular staining for Foxp3 transcription factor
Staining for Foxp3 transcription factor was performed using PE Mouse anti-human FoxP3 antibody and Human FoxP3 Buffer Set (BD Pharmingen). According to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the samples were stained for CD25 and CD4 cell surface markers, and washed with Stain Buffer (FBS) (BD Pharmingen). The cells were fixed with Human FoxP3 Buffer A and permeabilized with Human FoxP3 Buffer C. After resuspension in 100 μL of FBS Stain Buffer the cells were incubated with 5 µL of antibody specific for FoxP3 for 30 min at room temperature, protected from light and washed with Stain Buffer prior to flow cytometry analysis.
Statistical analysis
Depending on the type of variables and distribution normality, data are presented as n (%), average ± SD or median (min–max). The relationship between variables was estimated using the Spearman coefficient of correlation. For the modeling of the relationship of the ordinal dependent variable (acute genitourinary toxicity) in repeated measurements with potential predictors, a multilevel ordinal regression was used. Changes in outcomes were examined across the study time course with a linear mixed effects modeling approach implemented in the lme4 package for the R statistical computing environment (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria,2019)18. Toxicity predictors from univariate analyzes which were statistically significant were included in the multivariate multilevel ordinal regression model. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.
The correlation between percentage of specific lymphocyte subsets and gene expression levels at pre-treatment time point and at the last fraction was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdel-Messeih, P. L., Nosseir, N. M. & Bakhe, O. H. Evaluation of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers in prostate cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy. Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 42(1), 68–72 (2017).
Stenmark, M. H. et al. Combining physical and biologic parameters to predict radiation-induced lung toxicity in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 84(2), e217-222 (2012).
Bonkhoff, H. Factors implicated in radiation therapy failure and radiosensitization of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer 2012, 593241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/593241 (2012).
Rubin, P., Johnston, C. J., Williams, J. P., McDonald, S. & Finkelstein, J. N. A perpetual cascade of cytokines postirradiation leads to pulmonary fibrosis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 33(1), 99–109 (1995).
Christensen, E. et al. Longitudinal cytokine expression during IMRT for prostate cancer and acute treatment toxicity. Clin. Cancer Res. 15(17), 5576–5583 (2009).
Di Maggio, F. M. et al. Portrait of inflammatory response to ionizing radiation treatment. J. Inflamm. 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-015-0058-3 (2015).
Bedini, N. et al. Evaluation of mediators associated with the inflammatory response in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Dis. Mark. 2018, 9128128. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9128128 (2018).
Dirksen, S. R., Kirschner, K. F. & Belyea, M. J. Association of symptoms and cytokines in prostate cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. Biol. Res. Nurs. 16(3), 250–257 (2014).
Miao, L., Holley, A. K., Zhao, Y., St Clair, W. H. & St Clair, D. K. Redox-mediated and ionizing-radiation-induced inflammatory mediators in prostate cancer development and treatment. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 20(9), 1481–1500 (2014).
Bower, J. E. et al. Inflammatory biomarkers and fatigue during radiation therapy for breast and prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15(17), 5534–5540 (2009).
Wu, C. T., Chen, M. F., Chen, W. C. & Hsieh, C. C. The role of IL-6 in the radiation response of prostate cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 8, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-159 (2013).
Muroyama, Y. et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy increases functionally suppressive regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5(11), 992–1004 (2017).
Wu, C. T., Hsieh, C. C., Yen, T. C., Chen, W. C. & Chen, M. F. TGF-β1 mediates the radiation response of prostate cancer. J. Mol. Med. (Berl) 93(1), 73–82 (2015).
West, C. M. & Barnett, G. C. Genetics and genomics of radiotherapy toxicity: towards prediction. Genome Med. 3(8), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm268 (2011).
Ong, Z. Y. et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines play a key role in the development of radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Radiat Oncol. 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-22 (2010).
Kalff, J. C. et al. Intra-abdominal activation of a local inflammatory response within the human muscularis externa during laparotomy. Ann. Surg. 237(3), 301–315 (2003).
Stankovic, V. et al. Acute and late genitourinary toxicity after 72 Gy of conventionally fractionated conformal radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: Impact of individual and clinical parameters. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 28(9), 577–586 (2016).
Holliday, E. B. et al. Relationship between fatigue, sleep quality and inflammatory cytokines during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: A prospective study. Radiother. Oncol. 118(1), 105–111 (2016).
Okunieff, P., Chen, Y., Maguire, D. J. & Huser, A. K. Molecular markers of radiation-related normal tissue toxicity. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 27(3), 363–374 (2008).
Schaue, D., Kachikwu, E. L. & McBride, W. H. Cytokines in radiobiological responses: a review. Radiat. Res. 178(6), 505–523 (2012).
Sprung, C. N., Forrester, H. B., Siva, S. & Martin, O. A. Immunological markers that predict radiation toxicity. Cancer Lett. 368(2), 191–197 (2015).
Siva, S. et al. A pattern of early radiation-induced inflammatory cytokine expression is associated with lung toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 9(10), e109560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109560 (2014).
Culig, Z. Proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in prostate carcinogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2(3), 231–238 (2014).
Tazaki, E. et al. Serum cytokine profiles in patients with prostate carcinoma. Exp. Ther. Med. 2(5), 887–891 (2011).
Beer, L., Mildner, M., Gyöngyösi, M. & Ankersmit, H. J. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell secretome for tissue repair. Apoptosis 21(12), 1336–1353 (2016).
Gridley, D. S., Rizvi, A., Luo-Owen, X., Makinde, A. Y. & Pecaut, M. J. Low dose, low dose rate photon radiation modifies leukocyte distribution and gene expression in CD4(+) T cells. J. Radiat. Res. 50(2), 139–150 (2009).
Allan, D. S. et al. TGF-β affects development and differentiation of human natural killer cell subsets. Eur. J. Immunol. 40(8), 2289–2295 (2010).
Liu, Q. et al. Integrative omics analysis reveals the importance and scope of translational repression in microRNA-mediated regulation. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 12(7), 1900–1911 (2013).
Bouquet, F. et al. TGFβ1 inhibition increases the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vitro and promotes tumor control by radiation in vivo. Clin. Cancer Res. 17(21), 6754–6765 (2011).
Liu, S. et al. Effects of radiation on T regulatory cells in normal states and cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Am. J. Cancer Res. 5(11), 3276–3285 (2015).
Fisher, D. T., Appenheimer, M. M. & Evans, S. S. The two faces of IL-6 in the tumor microenvironment. Semin. Immunol. 26(1), 38–47 (2014).
Yang, X. O. et al. Molecular antagonism and plasticity of regulatory and inflammatory T cell programs. Immunity 29(1), 44–56 (2008).
Lin, G. et al. Interleukin-6 inhibits regulatory T cells and improves the proliferation and cytotoxic activity of cytokine-induced killer cells. J. Immunother. 35(4), 337–343 (2012).
Sojka, D. K. & Fowell, D. J. Regulatory T cells inhibit acute IFN-γ synthesis without blocking T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) differentiation via a compartmentalized requirement for IL-10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(45), 18336–18341 (2011).
Walle, T. et al. Radiation effects on antitumor immune responses: current perspectives and challenges. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 10, 1758834017742575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834017742575 (2018).
Peeters, S. T. et al. Acute and late complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy to 78 Gy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 61(4), 1019–1034 (2005).
ICRU Report 50. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1993).
ICRU Report 62. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU report 50). Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1999).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for the financial support (451-03-68/2020-14/200043). The authors would like to thank Center for Leadership Development – Programme “Move for Science”. Also, the authors would like to thank Tatjana Petrović for her excellent technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.S. designed the study, analyzed and interpreted obtained data, and participated in writing the manuscript. I.M. and N.P. performed experiments, analyzed and interpreted obtained data, and participated in writing the manuscript. V.S. and K.K. enrolled patients in the study, interpreted obtained clinical data, and participated in writing the manuscript. I.B., M.Đ.C. and E.M. performed experiments, analyzed obtained data and critically revised the manuscript. K.M.M. and A.V. performed experiments, analyzed obtained data and participated in writing the manuscript. Z.B. performed statistical analysis of the obtained results and critically revised the manuscript. Ž.Ž., M.W. and C.H. participated in interpretation of data and critically revised the manuscript. M.N. participated in study design, interpreted clinical data, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stanojković, T.P., Matić, I.Z., Petrović, N. et al. Evaluation of cytokine expression and circulating immune cell subsets as potential parameters of acute radiation toxicity in prostate cancer patients. Sci Rep 10, 19002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75812-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75812-0
This article is cited by
-
PKC-ζ mediated reduction of the extracellular vesicles-associated TGF-β1 overcomes radiotherapy resistance in breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
-
Detection of humoral and cellular immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in breastfeeding women and naïve and previously infected individuals
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Circulating levels of IL-6 and TGF-β1 in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy: associations with acute radiotoxicity and fatigue symptoms
BMC Cancer (2022)
-
Association between microRNAs 10b/21/34a and acute toxicity in glioblastoma patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.