Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Transcriptome sequencing and histology reveal dosage compensation in the liver of triploid pre-smolt Atlantic salmon

Abstract

Triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) is seen as one of the best solutions to solve key issues in the salmon farming industry, such as the impact of escapees on wild stocks and pre-harvest sexual maturation. However, the effects of triploidy on salmon smoltification are poorly understood at the molecular level, even though smoltification is a very sensitive period that has a major influence on survival rate and performance of farmed salmon. In this study, we have compared the liver transcriptomes of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon at three ontogeny stages: fry, parr and smolt. In diploid fish, a total of 2,655 genes were differentially expressed between fry and parr, whereas 506 genes had significantly different transcript levels between parr and smolts. In triploids, 1,507 and 974 genes were differentially expressed between fry and parr, and between parr and smolts, respectively. Most of these genes were down-regulated and 34 genes were differentially expressed between ploidies at the same stage. In both ploidy groups, the top differentially expressed genes with ontogeny stage belonged to common functional categories that can be related to smoltification. Nucleotide and energy metabolism were significantly down-regulated in fry when compared to parr, while immune system processes were significantly down-regulated in parr when compared to smolts. The close resemblance of enriched biological processes and pathways between ploidy groups suggests that triploidy is regulated by genome dosage compensation in Atlantic salmon. Histological analysis revealed that areas of vacuolization (steatosis) were present only in fry and parr stages, in contrast to a compact cellular histology with glycogen granules after smoltification. There was no significant difference in vacuolization between ploidy groups at the fry stage but the liver of diploid parr had a 33.5% higher vacuolization area compared to their triploid counterparts. Taken together, our data provide novel insights into the changes that occur at the molecular and histological level in the liver of both diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon prior to and during smoltification.

Introduction

The use of functionally sterile triploid fish has the potential to improve post-pubertal growth, survival and carcass quality under culture conditions1. Sterility may also minimize the risk of genetic and ecological interactions between farmed and wild stocks in the event of accidental farmed fish escapees2. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) aquaculture, escaped fish from sea cages represent one of the most persistent issues for sustainable development of the industry and have generated considerable concerns across all producing regions3. In Norway, farmed escapees are one of the main anthropogenic impact factors identified as an expanding threat to wild Atlantic salmon populations, besides sea lice infestations4. Genetic introgression from farmed salmon is reported to vary across rivers but remains widespread in Norwegian wild salmon populations, encouraging additional efforts to implement more robust production systems, escape prevention plans and other mitigation measures5.

Despite the potential of sterile triploid fish to contribute towards the development of a more sustainable and environmentally-friendly Atlantic salmon industry, uncertainties regarding the performance of cultured triploids have hindered their widespread adoption by most producers2. Regardless of the theoretical advantages that triploids might have over their diploid counterparts, comparative studies assessing their culture performance under different settings have produced “conflicting” results. For instance, a large and comprehensive study assessing the growth performance and sexual maturation in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon of both sexes in seawater tanks under natural or continuous photoperiod regimes resulted in growth performance of triploid groups being equally or better in some cases when compared to their diploid counterparts6. In addition, a study assessing the performance of diploids and triploids in freshwater from hatching until smolt stages showed no significant differences in survival rate, but triploids were smaller in size at earlier stages7. Welfare issues such as high prevalence of skeletal deformities in addition to other potential limitations in triploid Atlantic salmon, including abnormal heart morphology and abdominal lesions has been highlighted to limit its performance and subsequent adoption by producers8,9. In addition, escaped triploid males have been shown to interfere with natural reproduction in the wild by competing with wild males for wild fertile females by stimulating spawning in Atlantic salmon10 and in Atlantic cod11 as well.

From a nutritional perspective, a gut morphology study comparing triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon revealed a lower pyloric caeca number and shorter relative gut length in triploid post-smolts compared to its diploid counterparts12. Contrary to expectations, the use of dietary hydrolysed fish proteins rich in free amino acids and low molecular peptides that may ease feed absorption had no positive influence on nutrient utilization and growth in triploids as in diploids13. Reports at the molecular level with emphasis on understanding the physiology and impact of triploidy on Atlantic salmon during ontogeny until post-smoltification are quite scarce. A study comparing growth-related gene expression profiles of diploid and triploid bighead catfish (Clarias macrocephalus) showed similar liver transcriptome responses in both ploidy groups14. In contrast, a molecular study showed that early nutritional programming for up to 6 weeks affected metabolic processes in the liver of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon, where ploidy differences indicated the need for different ploidy-specific nutritional requirements for optimal performance15. A more recent study has shown that increase in dietary micronutrient levels led to vertebral expression of bone biomarker genes associated with reduced skeletal malformations in parr diploids and triploids but was found to be significant in the former16. Findings from these studies12,13,16 suggest that morphological, physiological and ploidy differences could play a role in determining digestive efficiency, nutritional requirements and subsequent growth and welfare of these fish.

Fish liver is involved in numerous functions including metabolism and immune system processes, to mention just a few. A study assessing the liver transcriptome response in Atlantic salmon fed diets with either fish oil or vegetable oil for up to 55 weeks revealed that there are genotype-specific metabolic responses at the molecular level17. Little is known about changes in the liver transcriptome of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon prior to and during smoltification. Hence, we used RNA-seq to investigate potential differences in the liver transcriptome of diploid and triploid individuals at three ontogeny stages (fry, parr and smolts). This molecular approach was complemented by histological observations aimed at examining liver morphology and degree of steatosis in relation to ontogeny and ploidy over the same developmental stages.

Results

Characterization of RNA-seq libraries

A similar number of raw reads was obtained for the three ontogeny groups, ranging from 7.9 to 40.9 million sequences (Supplementary info file, Fig. S1). After trimming, a total of 7.9 to 35.6 million reads remained and the overall mapping efficiency of these high-quality reads against the Atlantic salmon reference genome ranged from 82 to 99%. Three samples with total number of raw reads below 5 million and one extreme outlier were excluded from further analysis. As observed in the PCA plot (Fig. 1), all individuals from fry and parr groups clustered together, whereas one smolt sample was closer to the parr cluster. This could be attributed to late smoltification in this individual. Diploid and triploid fish within each group were found in the same cluster.

Figure 1
figure 1

PCA plot for all sample points. All individual samples of diploids and triploids Clustering brackets for: fry, parr and smolts.

Liver transcriptome differences with ontogeny and ploidy

Comparisons of liver transcriptomes between diploid and triploid fish at the same stage revealed that only 34 genes in total were differentially expressed between diploid and triploid salmon at a false discovery rate (FDR < 0.05) (Supplementary info file, Table S1). The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified when diploid is compared to triploid fish was highest at the parr stage, with 25 DEGs (17 up- and 8 down-regulated in diploid fish when compared to triploid counterparts and corresponding maximum fold changes of 3.3 for up-regulated and − 4.9 for down-regulated DEGs respectively). In contrast, there were 5,642 DEGs between successive ontogeny stages within each ploidy (Supplementary info file, Table S2).

The largest number of DEGs was observed when fry was compared to parr. There were 2,655 DEGs for diploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts, of which 1460 were up- and 1195 were down-regulated, with corresponding maximum fold changes of 8.7 (Table 1) and − 24.7 (Table 2). Triploid fry when compared to parr showed 873 up-regulated DEGs with a maximum fold-change of 44.2 (Table 1) and 634 down-regulated with fold changes down to − 6.9 (Table 2). It is noteworthy that 465 and 411 up- and down-regulated DEGs were common between diploid and triploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts. A single DEG was up-regulated in diploids and down-regulated in triploids (Fig. 2A).

Table 1 Up-regulated DEGs in diploid and triploid fry compared to parr. Fold changes (FC) and q values (p adj.) are indicated.
Table 2 Down-regulated DEGs in diploid and triploid fry compared to parr. Fold changes (FC) and q values (p adj.) are indicated.
Figure 2
figure 2

Venn diagrams for differentially expressed genes identified for comparisons between ‘fry vs. parr’ and ‘parr vs. smolt’ of diploid and triploid groups.

There were 506 DEGs between diploid parr and smolt, of which 240 were up-regulated with a maximum fold change of 9.6 (Table 3) and 266 were down-regulated (Table 4). The liver transcriptome of triploid parr when compared to their smolt counterparts showed 974 DEGs (306 up- and 668 down-regulated with maximum fold changes of 6.0 (Table 3) and − 12.2 (Table 4), respectively). Furthermore, there were 95 and 121 up- and down-regulated DEGs in common to diploid and triploid fish when comparing parr to smolts, respectively. Only 6 DEGs were up-regulated in diploids and down-regulated in triploids (Fig. 2B).

Table 3 Up-regulated DEGs in diploid and triploid parr compared to smolt. Fold changes (FC) and q values (p adj.) are indicated.
Table 4 Down-regulated DEGs in diploid and triploid parr compared to smolt. Fold changes (FC) and q values (p adj.) are indicated.

GO enrichment analysis for biological processes

Not all genes differentially expressed between diploid and triploid fish at the same stage had significantly enriched GO terms, while DEGs between successive stages within the same ploidy group showed significantly enriched GO terms (q < 0.05). There were 69 significantly enriched GO terms associated with down-regulated DEGs in diploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts (Supplementary info file, Table S3). Of these, approximately 91% were involved in metabolism and 9% were involved in cellular and other processes. Within comparisons between triploid fry and parr, there were 77 enriched GO terms (q < 0.05), only associated with down-regulated genes between stages (Supplementary info file, Table S3). Similarly to the diploid groups, 81% were involved in metabolism and 19% were involved in cellular and other processes. The top GO terms identified for fry when compared to parr in both ploidy groups were related to either nucleotide or energy metabolism (Fig. 3 A,B). A total of 18 GO terms were significantly enriched (q < 0.05) within the down-regulated genes between parr diploids and smolt diploids, and were involved in immunity (50%) or cellular processes (50%) (Supplementary info file, Table S4). There were 17 significantly enriched GO terms (q < 0.05) associated with the down-regulated genes for triploid parr when compared to their smolt counterparts. (Supplementary info file, Table S4). Approximately 57% of these were involved in immunity and 43% were related to cellular processes. In both diploid and triploid fish, the top GO terms identified for parr when compared to smolt fish were associated with general or cell-mediated immune processes (Fig. 3 C,D).

Figure 3
figure 3

GO enrichment of down-regulated DEGs in fry when compared to parr in diploids (A) and respective triploids (B), while C (diploids) and D (triploids) represents GO enrichment of down-regulated DEGs in parr when compared to smolts. T.B.P (triphosphate biosynthetic process), B.P (biosynthetic process), C.P.T (coupled proton transport), P.M.P (phosphate metabolic process), M.P (metabolic process), M.B.P (monophosphate biosynthetic process).

KEGG pathway analysis for down-regulated DEGs

The KEGG pathway analysis was performed on only down-regulated genes, since there were no significantly enriched GO terms associated with up-regulated genes. Diploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts had 17 KEGG pathways linked to 6 functional categories (Supplementary info file, Table S5): metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental processing, cellular processing, organismal systems and human diseases. DEGs down-regulated between triploid fry and parr were involved in 12 KEGG pathways associated with 5 functional categories (Supplementary info file, Table S6): genetic information processing, cellular processing, organismal systems and human diseases. There were 18 distinct KEGG pathways for diploid parr versus smolts (Supplementary info file, Table S7), which were associated with 6 functional categories: metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental processing, cellular processes, organismal systems and human diseases. The 10 KEGG pathways associated with down-regulated genes for triploid parr when compared to their smolt counterparts were linked to the functional categories genetic information processing, environmental processing and cellular processing (Supplementary info file, Table S8).

Top regulated genes in diploid and triploid fish

The top up-regulated genes in diploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts belonged to functional categories including, cellular processes and lipid metabolism (Table 1). Alternatively, when triploid fry were compared to parr, top up-regulated DEGs in parr had relatively higher maximum fold-change values compared to diploids. A gene involved in alcohol metabolism and oxidative stress (alcohol dehydrogenase 1-like) was the most up-regulated in fry, with a fold-change of 44.2 when compared to smolt fish. Other up-regulated DEGs in this comparison were related to immune system and cellular processes (Table1).

Within diploids, most down-regulated DEGs for fry compared to parr were associated with either carbohydrate, lipid or other metabolic processes (Table 2). Notable genes involved in lipid metabolism were hepatic triacylglycerol lipase-like. Down-regulated genes found for triploid fry compared to parr counterparts had functions related to cellular processes (importin subunit alpha-1-like, tublin beta 4B class IVb and aurora kinase B-like), lipid metabolism (hepatic triacylglycerol lipase-like) and carbohydrate metabolism (Table 2). A gene involved in amino acid metabolism through polyamine biosynthesis (ornithine decarboxylase 1-like) was down-regulated in both diploid and triploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts.

Most up-regulated DEGs in diploid parr versus smolt counterparts were linked to metabolism, genetic information processes, immune system and other cellular processes (Table 3). Notable of all DEGs identified was, ornithine decarboxylase 1. On the other hand, DEGs up-regulated for triploid parr when compared to smolt were linked to cellular processes, polyamine biosynthesis (ornithine decarboxylase 1-like), genetic information processes (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 3–1),heme and ion binding and oxidoreductase activity (Table 3). Down-regulated genes in diploid parr when compared to smolt were mostly involved in genetic information processes and immunity (Table 4).. Within triploids, the top down-regulated DEGs in parr when compared to smolt include metabolism, general immune system-related genes, alcohol metabolism and oxidative stress (alcohol dehydrogenase 1-like) (Table 4).

Liver histology

There were no obvious differences in the general liver morphology between ploidy groups at fry, parr or smolt stages (Fig. 4). Liver steatosis was only observed and therefore quantified in the first two ontogeny stages. No sign of vacuolization in hepatocytes was found in smolts, which had only glycogen granules and a very compact cellular structure, independently of ploidy (Fig. 4). The degree of liver steatosis was similar between diploid and triploid individuals at the fry stage and significantly decreased (P < 0.001) in both ploidy groups at the parr stage. This was more pronounced in triploid parr, which had a degree of vacuolization significantly lower (P < 0.001) than their diploid counterparts (Fig. 5). The nuclear size (minor and major axis) of hepatocytes was significantly larger (P < 0.001) in triploid than in diploid fish at all three developmental stages (Table 5). The minor and major axis of hepatocytes in triploids measured 1.2–1.4 times and 1.2–1.3 times those of diploids, respectively, with a tendency for nuclear differences between ploidies to decrease, although not significantly, from fry to smolt stage.

Figure 4
figure 4

Liver sections (H&E staining) of diploid (AC) and triploid (DF) Atlantic salmon. The images show various degrees of vacuolization (arrowheads) in hepatocytes at fry (A,D) and parr (B,E) stage, and a compact cellular histology with glycogen granules (arrows) at smolt stage (C,F). Scale bars represent 50 µm.

Figure 5
figure 5

Quantification of liver steatosis (vacuolization area) in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon at fry and parr stages. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 3). Different letters denote significant differences (P < 0.05).

Table 5 Nuclear size (minor and major axis) of hepatocytes in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon from fry to smolt stage.

Discussion

We have found very similar liver transcriptomes between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon at the same ontogeny stage. In contrast, gene expression levels changed substantially from fry to parr to smolt. Only the DEGs up-regulated during ontogeny (i.e., down-regulated in fry versus parr and parr versus smolt) were significantly enriched for biological processes and pathways in both diploid and triploid fish.

There were several down-regulated pathways in both diploid and triploid fry when compared to parr, namely genetic information processes, cellular processes and organismal systems. Some pathways involved in metabolism (carbohydrate, energy and amino acid) and environmental processes (signal transduction) were exclusively down-regulated between diploid fry and diploid parr. Nevertheless, the biological processes observed for the top 10 GO terms significantly enriched and down-regulated between fry and parr were identical in diploid and triploid fish. Most biological processes significantly down-regulated in fry when compared to parr were involved in either energy or nucleotide metabolism. Nucleotides are known to be involved in a variety of chemical functions, including energy metabolism18,19. Therefore, a down-regulation of nucleotide metabolism can potentially decrease energy metabolism. It has been reported that nucleotide deficiency negatively impacts the performance of key organs and processes, such as liver, heart, intestine and immune functions20. The higher levels of transcripts related to nucleotide and energy metabolism in parr when compared to fry are likely related to a surge in energy metabolism needed for subsequent smolt transformation, according to a previous report21.

Compared to parr, fry had lower transcript levels of genes related to lipid, carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. In fish, a lower lipid content is known to favour increase in body water content and vice versa22,23. It has been reported that decline in lipid metabolism of salmonids during smoltification helps mobilise energy reserves (triglycerols) required for environment and ontogeny-associated changes21. Also, Wedemeyer et al.24 highlighted the contribution of lipid decline as salmonid develops into smolts towards silvering, increased growth rate, salinity tolerance and increased pituitary growth hormones in order to adapt to environmental-associated changes at sea. These findings demonstrate the importance of down-regulating lipid metabolism during ontogeny and environmental-associated changes encountered by salmonids during smoltification. In addition, the interactions between lipid, carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism decline in Atlantic salmon facilitate smoltification24,25. Lipid and carbohydrate depletion during smoltification are the results of increased lipolytic/glygenolytic enzyme activity, decrease in lipid/glycogen synthesis and increase in the rate of plasma fatty acid/glucose turn over21. Hence, the observed down-regulation of genes involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in the liver of fry compared to parr probably favour mobilisation of energy required to reach the parr stage. Common to both ploidy groups for the same comparison was the down-regulation of ornithine decarboxylase 1-like, which is known to be involved in immune and inflammatory responses through directing arginine flux away from nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide production by existing as a free radical toxic to bacteria and a signalling molecule26. Down-regulation of this gene in fry when compared to parr stages may be related to the susceptibility of Atlantic salmon fry to bacterial infections27 during transition to parr. Some genes involved in various cellular processes (e.g., aurora kinase B-like and importin subunit alpha-1-like) were down-regulated exclusively in triploid fry when compared to their parr counterparts. This could be due to the fact that triploidy leads to an overall reduced cell number in comparison to diploids, which limits their normal cellular functions and organ system processes to some extent28. We did not observe significant differences in hepatocyte number between diploid and triploid fish but our histology analysis was limited to the mid-portion of the liver.

Both diploid and triploid fry had relatively few up-regulated DEGs when compared to their parr counterparts and these DEGs belonged to similar functional categories, mostly related to cellular processes. A notable difference between ploidy groups was the 44-fold up-regulation exclusively in triploid fry of adh1, a gene involved in alcohol metabolism and oxidative stress. This may be linked to the fact that triploid salmonids tend to be more prone to oxidative stress than their diploid counterparts at juvenile29 and post-smolt stages30.

The enriched GO terms for down-regulated genes between parr and smolt fish were very similar in diploid and triploid fish, and they were related to cell-mediated immunity or general immune system processes. In both ploidy groups, the top significantly enriched GO terms down-regulated in parr when compared to smolts included taxis and chemotaxis, cellular response to chemical stimulus and cell migration, which indicate increased cell-mediated immunity and directional phagocytosis in smolts. Movement of microphages in fishes has already been demonstrated to be by either chemokinesis (a non-directional movement of the phagocyte) or chemotaxis (a directional movement of the phagocyte) in response to bacterial antigens in vivo or in vitro31,32,33. Cell-mediated immunity is particularly important in the elimination of intracellular pathogens31. A recent study showed a strong relationship between MHC and disease resistance of Atlantic salmon to infectious salmon anaemia34. The potential changes in the immune system of smolts is likely important for their survival at sea, where they will be exposed to new pathogens.

The most up-regulated DEGs in diploid and triploid parr when compared to smolts included genes involved in metabolism and cellular processes. For example, a gene involved in polyamine biosynthesis (ornithine decarboxylase 1-like) was up-regulated in parr with fold changes of 6.3 and 4.5 in diploids and triploids, respectively. The enzyme encoded by this gene is a key regulator in growth processes in vertebrates and has been positively correlated with specific growth rate in Atlantic salmon35. Its higher transcript levels in parr may be related to the rapid growth change known to occur in pre-smolts. Up-regulated metabolic rates could also be due to the fish being bigger in size and with a subsequently higher basal metabolic rate. The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 3–1 was also up-regulated in parr and it can affect growth, since it encodes a vital mRNA cap-binding protein that controls global translation rates36.

Similar KEGG pathways for down-regulated DEGs were observed in both diploid and triploid parr when compared to their smolt counterparts, and include genetic information processing, environmental processing and cellular processing. The down-regulated pathways specific to diploid parr were involved in lipid and amino acid metabolism and organismal system processes related to development.

The top up- and down-regulated genes in fry compared to parr and in parr versus smolt were remarkably similar in diploid and triploid fish. Moreover, the significantly enriched down-regulated GO terms showed a striking resemblance in functional categories for both ploidy groups (Fig. 6). Compared to mammals, lower vertebrates such as fish cope quite well with polyploidy37,38. Generally, polyploidisation is regulated through two processes: genome dosage effect or genome dosage compensation39. The genome dosage effect is reflected by a correlation between expressed genes and the number of chromosomes, while in the case of genome dosage compensation, gene expression for polyploids tends to mirror that of diploids40.

Figure 6
figure 6

Overview of the changes in the Atlantic salmon liver transcriptome during ontogeny. There were very few differences between diploid and triploid individuals at the same stage, indicating a clear dosage compensation. The main DEGs between fry vs parr and parr vs smolt are indicated, along with their functions and significantly enriched GO terms.

A recent study has shown that performance and growth of triploid Atlantic salmon is linked to the second maternal chromosome set41. These findings suggest that maternal and paternal contributions from diploid broodstock may not have equal weight when selecting for best performing triploids. To add up to these findings, a study determining dosage compensation using liver transcriptome of diploid parent grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) and their triploid offspring showed similar expression levels in both ploidies where expression level dominance (ELD) was found to be biased towards the maternal genome42. In addition, homolog gene expression levels in this study showed the combined role of regulatory functions and epigenetics through a transcriptome network vital for adaptation during growth of triploids42 which is likely to be the case of this study. Generally, triploid salmon shows either a positive or negative dosage compensation when compared to diploid full-sibs counterparts39,43. Determining dosage compensation with focus on the liver can be questionable because the liver of eukaryotic organisms has been reported to form variable percentages of polyploidy cells during liver growth and under other circumstances44. In mammals, the onset and degree of polyploidization in hepatocytes vary across species and can be observed during normal or pathological conditions but the functional significance of the process remains uncertain46. To date, polyploidization events have not been reported for the liver of fish45,46,47, including salmonids48, irrespective of their ploidy status but information on Atlantic salmon is still lacking. In our study, we compared the nuclear size of hepatocytes in the liver of diploid and triploid salmon13 as indicator of their ploidy status. Cell size measurements (e.g. minor axis of erythrocytes) are frequently used as indirect measurements of DNA content in artificially induced triploids28,49. Overall, hepatocyte cell nuclei in triploids measured 1.2–1.4 times those of diploids and contained by definition correspondingly higher levels of DNA than diploid nuclei. Overall, these quantitative histological findings validate the use of liver as central organ regulating energy metabolism and several other functions to assess the possibility of dosage compensation in our study. This is in line with the work of Christensen et al.50 where liver tissue was chosen to measure gene expression levels in coho salmon under different metabolic states.

Triploid cell nuclei are expected to contain one extra haploid set of maternal chromosomes and therefore 50% more DNA than diploid cell nuclei with some degree of variation likely to occur across tissues within the same individual49. For example, variability in terms of nuclear differences between these two ploidies, possibly induced by specific cellular and nuclear adjustments, has been reported across tissues and organs of the marine medaka, Oryzias dancena51. In our work, cell measurements performed on histological sections showed that the nuclear size (minor and major axis) of triploid over diploid hepatocytes of juvenile Atlantic salmon was below the expected 1.5 ratio and further studies are required to explore the cellular processes occurring in the liver of these two ploidy groups.

Overall, our results indicate clear similarities in the general liver morphology and steatosis between diploid and triploid fish prior to and after smoltification. Quantification of liver steatosis based on the degree of vacuolization in the cytoplasm and the degree of distribution of the vacuolated hepatocytes has been employed in numerous fish studies addressing lipid metabolism. In Atlantic salmon, examples include nutritional and nutrigenomics studies performed to assess the effects of plant meal diets and natural plant extracts52, functional feeds53,54 and inclusion of micronutrients in low marine fish diets16 on fish growth, development and health. In the present work, the observed decrease in liver steatosis from fry to parr reflected the hepatic transcriptome profiles, which showed a significant up-regulation of genes involved in lipid metabolism in parr compared to fry, independently from their ploidy status. Such higher levels of relevant transcripts likely supported the mobilisation of energy required to reach this phase of development and in preparation of smoltification. These results are in agreement with Peruzzi et al.13, where the same experimental diploid and triploid fish fed a standard commercial fishmeal diet displayed a surge in somatic growth in the period from fry to parr. It is known that alterations in lipid metabolism during parr-smolt transformation in Atlantic salmon lead to smolt having reduced available liver, as well as muscle, energy reserves compared to parr and these are regarded as an integral part of the process21,55,56. In the present study, the lack of vacuolisation in the hepatocytes of both diploid and triploid smolts points indicates additional similarities between these two ploidy groups in the pattern of lipid mobilisation required during the final steps of parr-smolt transformation.

In Atlantic salmon, the liver transcriptome is different between fry, parr and smolts, as expected. The top differentially expressed genes between ontogeny stages are involved in preparation for smoltification. These include aurkb, ima2, cpt1b, cpt1a, slc6a13, odc1, lipc, lipe, dcor1, pla2g3, ppp1r3b, ccl19, gnvip1, scyb7, ifi44, adh1, which are involved in oxidative stress, metabolism, immune system and cellular processes. Most of these genes were common to both ploidy groups, except one gene that plays a role in oxidative stress (adh1) and two genes involved in cellular processes (ima2 and aurkb), which were differentially regulated exclusively in triploids. At each ontogeny stage, the biological processes enriched for down-regulated genes showed a striking resemblance in diploid and triploid fish, which was reflected in a similar liver morphology and level of vacuolisation between ploidy groups.

Materials and methods

Experimental setup and fish husbandry

Details on the relationship, origin, production, growth parameters and rearing protocols of the experimental fish are provided by Peruzzi et al.13. Briefly, experimental fish comprising of diploid (2n) and triploid (3n) ova were produced using siblings composed of n = 17 full-sib and half families produced by a commercial hatchery (Stonfiskur HF, Iceland) where triploidy was induced by a pressure shock of 9500 psi applied for 5 min, 300° minutes post-fertilization at 5 °C46. Eyed-ova (~ 400 day-degrees) were then shipped to the Aquaculture Research Station in Kårvika (Tromsø, Norway). Prior to start-feeding, the ploidy status of the experimental groups was verified by flow cytometry as previously reported13. The experimental fish were reared in triplicate tanks and fed a commercial standard diet (Skretting AS, Stavanger, Norway) whilst being reared at low temperature from start-feeding to completion of the parr-smolt transformation. Constant light was used throughout the experiment, except for a period of reduced day length required to simulate winter conditions and induce parr-smolt transformation13. For sampling purposes, fish were euthanized using an anaesthetic overdose of benzocaine (120 mgL-1, Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., United Kingdom). Liver samples were collected from fish at the ontogeny stages below, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported on dry ice to Nord University (Bodø, Norway) where they were stored at − 80 oC until transcriptome analysis. The average weight of fish at each stage used for this: fry (2n = 3.62 g and 3n = 4.11 g), parr (2n = 27.83 g and 3n = 29.89 g) and smolt (2n = 56.44 g and 3n = 66.56 g). Samples collected for all analyses had weights close to the mean weight.

Preparation of RNA-seq libraries and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver samples following the QIAzol protocol (Qiagen, Germany) and further cleaned with the RNeasy MinElute cleanup kit (Qiagen, Germany). Quality and quantity of total RNA were determined using the 2200 TapeStation from Agilent (USA). Each RNA sample used had a RINe (RNA integrity) value above 7. RNA was extracted from 5 individual liver samples (n = 5) per ploidy group at selected sampling stages fry (1455 degree-days post-start feeding, ddPSF), parr (1888 ddPSF) and smolt (2745 ddPSF). RNA-seq libraries were prepared from total RNA using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep kit (NEB, USA). The barcoded libraries were checked for quality and quantity on a 2200 TapeStation before pooling and sequencing. Library pools were sequenced on the NextSeq500 (Illumina, USA) with the Nextseq 500/550 high output kit v2.5 sequencing kit (150 cycles single-end reads) at Nord University, Norway.

Bioinformatics

Data were converted from BCL to FASTA format and demultiplexed using the Illumina script bcl2fastq conversion software v2.17 with default parameters. Adapters were then removed using the Cutadapt57 and quality of the trimmed reads was checked using the FastQC software58. Clean reads were mapped to the Atlantic salmon genome and transcriptome annotation databases (RefSeq accession: GCF_000233375.1 from the NCBI database) using TopHat259. Uniquely mapped transcripts were quantified using HTSeq (high-throughput sequence) counts60 and DEGs were then identified using DESeq2.

(https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html), with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 (Benjamin-Hochberg method)61. The R packages ggplot2 and heatmap were used for graphical representation of the data. DEGs were then subjected to GO enrichment analysis for biological processes using DAVID v6.8 with an EASE score ≤ 0.0162,63. Selected DEGs obtained from DESeq2 in Entrez gene identifier format were converted to FASTA format for downstream analysis on the Kyoto Encyclopaedia for Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS)64.

Liver histology

Liver samples from different fish belonging to the same group used for transcriptomic analysis were fixed in 10% (v/v) neutral buffered formalin for 48 h before transferred to 70% (v/v) ethanol for storage. Samples were then transferred to standard cassettes, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned at 5 μm on a RM2255 rotary microtome (Leica Microsystems, Germany). The sections were stained with haematoxylin/eosin (Thermoscientific, USA) according to standard histological procedures and examined on a DM 2000 LED light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) equipped with a Leica DFC 295 digital Colour Camera. Photographs of the sections were processed using the Leica software application suite. A total of 41 individual samples were selected for this study: 10 fry (2n = 4 and 3n = 6), 15 (2n = 8 and 3n = 7) parr and 16 (3n and 2n = 8) smolts. Liver steatosis (lipid vacuolization) was assessed on images captured at magnification of 40 × and analysed with ImageJ following a modification of the method by Campos et al.65. Briefly, three sections per individual were scored for vesicular steatosis (clear vacuoles with a diameter greater than 5 μm) in hepatocytes using a set scale of 7 pixels/ μm. For each section, a 5,000 μm2 rectangular frame was placed over three hepatic regions distant from large vessels and the average area (μm2) occupied by lipid vacuoles within hepatocytes was calculated. Nuclear size (minor and major axis) of hepatocytes was assessed on the above-reported histological sections (ca. n = 10 nuclei/section) captured at a magnification of 40 × and analysed with ImageJ using a set scale of 1.0 μm.

Statistical analysis

Liver steatosis data (i.e., vacuolization area) were log-transformed and checked for normality and equality of variance prior to two-way ANOVA with fish ploidy and ontogeny stage as fixed factors. When significant differences were found, the Hochberg’s post-hoc test was used to determine differences between individual fish groups. Hepatocytes’ nuclear size measurements in both ploidies and at different ontogeny stages were compared by Students’ t-test. Ratios of nuclear measurements in hepatocytes of triploid over diploid fish at different stages were analysed by one-way ANOVA with ontogeny stage as fixed factor. All data analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS statistics, USA) and the results were considered significant at P < 0.05. Data are reported as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Ethics statement

All experimental procedures involving Atlantic salmon were in accordance with the Norwegian legislation on animal experimentation and the guidelines of the European Union Council (Directive 2010/EU) and were approved by the Norwegian Committee on Ethics in Animal Experimentation (Project license permit ID: 8180) issued by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet).

Data availability

Raw sequenced data has been submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioSample accession: SAMN13315576, ID: 13315576.

Abbreviations

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes

PCA:

Principal component analysis

References

  1. Piferrer, F. et al. Polyploid fish and shellfish: production, biology and applications to aquaculture for performance improvement and genetic containment. Aquaculture 293, 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.04.036 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benfey, T. J. Effectiveness of triploidy as a management tool for reproductive containment of farmed fish: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) as a case study. Rev Aquacul 8, 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12092 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glover, K. A. et al. Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: status of knowledge and unanswered questions. Fish Fish. 18, 890–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12214 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forseth, T. et al. The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx020 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glover, K. A. et al. Domesticated escapees on the run: the second-generation monitoring programme reports the numbers and proportions of farmed Atlantic salmon in >200 Norwegian rivers annually. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy207 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oppedal, F., Taranger, G. L. & Hansen, T. Growth performance and sexual maturation in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in seawater tanks exposed to continuous light or simulated natural photoperiod. Aquaculture 215, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00223-5 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGeachy, S. A., Benfey, T. & Friars, G. Freshwater performance of triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in New Brunswick aquaculture. Aquaculture 137, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(95)01100-5 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser, T. W. et al. The effect of triploidy on the culture performance, deformity prevalence, and heart morphology in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 416, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.034 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser, T. W., Fjelldal, P. G., Hansen, T. & Mayer, I. Welfare considerations of triploid fish. Rev. Fish. Sci. 20, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2012.704598 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fjelldal, P. G., Wennevik, V., Fleming, I., Hansen, T. & Glover, K. Triploid (sterile) farmed Atlantic salmon males attempt to spawn with wild females. Aquacul Environ Interact 5, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00102 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feindel, N. J., Benfey, T. J. & Trippel, E. A. Competitive spawning success and fertility of triploid male Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Aquacul Environ Interact 1, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00006 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peruzzi, S., Hagen, Ø & Jobling, M. Gut morphology of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Aquacul Int 23, 1105–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9867-2 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peruzzi, S. et al. Growth and development of skeletal anomalies in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed phosphorus-rich diets with fish meal and hydrolyzed fish protein. PLoS ONE 13, e0194340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194340 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatchaiphan, S., Srisapoome, P., Kim, J.-H., Devlin, R. H. & Na-Nakorn, U. D. novo transcriptome characterization and growth-related gene expression profiling of diploid and triploid bighead catfish (Clarias macrocephalus Günther, 1864). Mar. Biotechnol. 19, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-017-9730-3 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vera, L. et al. Early nutritional programming affects liver transcriptome in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. BMC Genom. 18, 886. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4264-7 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, J. F. et al. The effect of micronutrient supplementation on growth and hepatic metabolism in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr fed a low marine ingredient diet. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 227, 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2018.10.004 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morais, S. et al. Genotype-specific responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) subject to dietary fish oil replacement by vegetable oil: a liver transcriptomic analysis. BMC Genom. 12, 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-255 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carver, J. D. & Walker, W. A. The role of nucleotides in human nutrition. J. Nutr. Biochem. 6, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-2863(94)00019-I (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cosgrove, M. Nucleotides. Nutrition 14, 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(98)00075-6 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grimble, G. K. & Westwood, O. M. R. in Nutrition and Immunology: Principles and Practice (eds M. Eric Gershwin, J. Bruce German, & Carl L. Keen) 135–144 (Humana Press, 2000).

  21. Sheridan, M. A. Alterations in lipid metabolism accompanying smoltification and seawater adaptation of salmonid fish. Aquaculture 82, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90408-0 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komourdjian, M., Saunders, R. & Fenwick, J. Evidence for the role of growth hormone as a part of a’light–pituitary axis’ in growth and smoltification of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Zool. 54, 544–551 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saunders, R. L. & Henderson, E. B. Changes in gill ATPase activity and smolt status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J. Fish Board Can. 35, 1542–1546. https://doi.org/10.1139/f78-244 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wedemeyer, G. A., Saunders, R. L. & Clarke, W. C. Environmental Factors Affecting Smoltification and Early Marine Survival of Anadromous Salmonids (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Station, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Malikova, E. Biochemical analysis of young salmon at the time of their transformation to a condition close to the smolt stage, and during retention of smolts in freshwater. Tr. Latv. Otdel. VNIRO 2, 1–19 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kortner, T. M. et al. Dietary soyasaponin supplementation to pea protein concentrate reveals nutrigenomic interactions underlying enteropathy in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Vet. Res. 8, 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-101 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts, R. & Pearson, M. Infectious pancreatic necrosis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J. Fish Dis. 28, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2005.00642.x (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maxime, V. The physiology of triploid fish: current knowledge and comparisons with diploid fish. Fish Fish. 9, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00269.x (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott, M. A., Dhillon, R. S., Schulte, P. M. & Richards, J. G. Physiology and performance of wild and domestic strains of diploid and triploid rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in response to environmental challenges. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0450 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sambraus, F. et al. Water temperature and oxygen: The effect of triploidy on performance and metabolism in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L) post-smolts. Aquaculture 473, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.01.024 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shoemaker, C. A., Klesius, P. H. & Lim, C. Immunity and disease resistance in fish. Nutrit. Fish Health https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8030(92)90056-4 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weeks-Perkins, B. A. & Ellis, A. E. Chemotactic responses of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) macrophages to virulent and attenuated strains of Aeromonas salmonicida. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 5, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1006/fsim.1995.0030 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Klesius, P. H. & Sealey, W. M. Chemotactic and chemokinetic responses of channel catfish macrophages to exoantigen from Edwardsiella ictaluri. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 8, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8667(1996)008%3c0314:CACROC%3e2.3.CO;2 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grimholt, U. et al. MHC polymorphism and disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar); facing pathogens with single expressed major histocompatibility class I and class II loci. Immunogenetics 55, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-003-0567-8 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Benfey, T., Saunders, R., Knox, D. & Harmon, P. Muscle ornithine decarboxylase activity as an indication of recent growth in pre-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 121, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90014-0 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lindemann, S. et al. Integrins regulate the intracellular distribution of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E in platelets A checkpoint for translational control. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33947–33951. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M104281200 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Otto, S. P. & Whitton, J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 401–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dowling, T. E. & Secor, C. L. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shrimpton, J. M., Sentlinger, A. M., Heath, J. W., Devlin, R. H. & Heath, D. D. Biochemical and molecular differences in diploid and triploid ocean-type chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 33, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-007-9138-5 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Birchler, J. A., Bhadra, U., Bhadra, M. P. & Auger, D. L. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev. Biol. 234, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2005.00642.x (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Harvey, A. C., Fjelldal, P. G., Solberg, M. F., Hansen, T. & Glover, K. Ploidy elicits a whole-genome dosage effect: growth of triploid Atlantic salmon is linked to the genetic origin of the second maternal chromosome set. BMC Genet. 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0502-x (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ren, L. et al. Determination of dosage compensation and comparison of gene expression in a triploid hybrid fish. BMC Genom. 18, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3424-5 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ching, B., Jamieson, S., Heath, J., Heath, D. D. & Hubberstey, A. Transcriptional differences between triploid and diploid Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) during live Vibrio anguillarum challenge. Heredity 104, 224. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.108 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Celton-Morizur, S. & Desdouets, C. in Polyploidization and cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Polyploidization of Liver Cells, Vol. 676 (ed Poon R. Y. C) 123–135 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).

  45. Shima, A. & Egami, N. Absence of systematic polyploidization of hepatocyte nuclei during the ageing process of the male medaka Oryzias latipes. Exp. Gerontol. 13, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0531-5565(78)90030-X (1978).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bachmann, K. & Cowden, R. Specific DNA amounts and nuclear size in fish hepatocytes and erythrocytes. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 463–471, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3224269 (1967).

  47. Juchno, D., Lackowska, B., Boron, A. & Kilarski, W. DNA content of hepatocyte and erythrocyte nuclei of the spined loach (Cobitis taenia L) and its polyploid forms. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 36, 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-009-9322-x (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Utter, F. M., Johnson, O. W., Thorgaard, G. H. & Rabinovitch, P. S. Measurement and potential applications of induced triploidy in Pacific salmon. Aquaculture 35, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90080-7 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Benfey, T. J. The physiology and behavior of triploid fishes. Rev. Fish. Sci. 7, 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641269991319162 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Christensen, K. A. et al. Effect of triploidy on liver gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) under different metabolic states. BMC Genom. 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5655-8 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Goo, I. B., Im, J. H., Gil, H. W., Lim, S. G. & Park, I.-S. Comparison of cell and nuclear size difference between diploid and induced triploid in marine medaka Oryzias dancena. Dev. Reprod. 19, 127. https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.127 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Gu, M., Kortner, T. M., Penn, M., Hansen, A. K. & Krogdahl, Å. Effects of dietary plant meal and soya-saponin supplementation on intestinal and hepatic lipid droplet accumulation and lipoprotein and sterol metabolism in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Br. J. Nutr. 111, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513002717 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Martinez-Rubio, L. et al. Effect of functional feeds on fatty acid and eicosanoid metabolism in liver and head kidney of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) with experimentally induced heart and skeletal muscle inflammation. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 34, 1533–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2013.03.363 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Skugor, S. et al. Nutrigenomic effects of glucosinolates on liver, muscle and distal kidney in parasite-free and salmon louse infected Atlantic salmon. Parasit. Vec. 9, 639. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1921-7 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Leonard, J. B. & McCormick, S. D. Metabolic enzyme activity during smolting in stream-and hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 1585–1593. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-105 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Maxime, V., Boeuf, G., Pennec, J. & Peyraud, C. Comparative study of the energetic metabolism of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr and smolts. Aquaculture 82, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90405-5 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. (2010).

  59. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn923 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Moriya, Y., Itoh, M., Okuda, S., Yoshizawa, A. C. & Kanehisa, M. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W182–W185. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm321 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Campos, V. E. W., Pereira, B. F., Pitol, D. L., da Silva Alves, R. M. & Caetano, F. H. Analysis of the liver of fish species prochilodus lineatus altered environments analyzed with ImageJ. Microsc. Res. 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.4236/mr.2017.51001 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder, Anusha Dhanasiri and Qirui Zhang (Nord University), Fride Tonning, Tanja Hannebrekke, Anette Hustad and the technical staff at the Aquaculture Research Station (Kårvika, Tromsø, Norway) for technical assistance. Not forgetting Velmurugu Puvanendran (NOFIMA AS), Guido Riesen (Skretting AS), Rudi Ripman Seim (SalmoBreed AS), Silvia Martínez-Llorens (Polytechnic University of Valencia) and Malcolm Jobling (UiT- The Arctic University of Norway). This project was funded by the Norwegian Research Council (grant no. 248028), with additional support from Nord University (Norway) and UiT- The Arctic University of Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M.O.F., S.P., O.H., and I-B.F-P. conceptualized and designed the experiment. D.K.O. conducted the RNA experiment and sequencing. J.M.O.F. and D.K.O. performed the bioinformatic analysis. S.P., I-B.F-P and D.K.O. curated histology data and analysis. J.M.O.F., S.P. and D.K.O. drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge M. O. Fernandes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Odei, D.K., Hagen, Ø., Peruzzi, S. et al. Transcriptome sequencing and histology reveal dosage compensation in the liver of triploid pre-smolt Atlantic salmon. Sci Rep 10, 16836 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73814-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73814-6

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing