Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Network-based modeling of drug effects on disease module in systemic sclerosis

### Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 09 April 2021

## Abstract

The network-based proximity between drug targets and disease genes can provide novel insights regarding the repercussions, interplay, and repositioning of drugs in the context of disease. Current understanding and treatment for reversing of the fibrotic process is limited in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We have developed a network-based analysis for drug effects that takes into account the human interactome network, proximity measures between drug targets and disease-associated genes, genome-wide gene expression and disease modules that emerge through pertinent analysis. Currently used and potential drugs showed a wide variation in proximity to SSc-associated genes and distinctive proximity to the SSc-relevant pathways, depending on their class and targets. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TyKIs) approach disease gene through multiple pathways, including both inflammatory and fibrosing processes. The SSc disease module includes the emerging molecular targets and is in better accord with the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of the disease. In the disease-module network, the greatest perturbing activity was shown by nintedanib, followed by imatinib, dasatinib, and acetylcysteine. Suppression of the SSc-relevant pathways and alleviation of the skin fibrosis was remarkable in the inflammatory subsets of the SSc patients receiving TyKI therapy. Our results show that network-based drug-disease proximity offers a novel perspective into a drug’s therapeutic effect in the SSc disease module. This could be applied to drug combinations or drug repositioning, and be helpful guiding clinical trial design and subgroup analysis.

## Introduction

Cells must act like a well-orchestrated group, thus, genes, proteins and other chemical compounds seldom operate separately but instead act together to perform the various biological functions of the cellular network1. In the context of disease, various combinations of dysregulated genes converge to activate common pathways and perturb the shared network states, resulting in complex diseases with similar phenotypes2,3. Similarly, drugs exert their therapeutic effects by modulating molecular pathways or networks linked with their primary target molecule(s)4. It is also thought that system-wide molecular actions of drugs are partially responsible for off-target effects, adverse effects, or beneficial effects in off-label indications5. Direct study of the respective pathways and biological processes is cumbersome. However, systemic analysis of large integrated datasets has recently provided opportunities to reveal missing connections, and hence to bridge gaps in the existing knowledge, to better understand human diseases6,7. Using knowledge of the proximity of compounds and their targets to key disease genes has emerged as a possible method to identify potential compound-disease pairs. These analyses are based on the hypothesis that the closer a drug’s target is to the disease-associated network, the higher the chance it will influence the disease’s state and progression8. This principle can guide drug topology in the network module of the disease and the drug’s utilization in personalized medicine.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by a distinctive pathogenetic triad of microvascular damage, dysregulated autoimmunity and generalized fibrosis of the skin and multiple internal organs, usually resulting in permanent functional impairment associated with high morbidity and mortality9. Current therapeutic approaches consist of treatments against the vasculopathy, general immunosuppression and organ-specific therapies for the affected organs, although no single therapy has yet proven to effectively reverse or alleviate the fibrotic process in SSc9. Many past clinical trials have produced negative results, which may be due to: being driven by the wrong choice of target pathways or molecules, the chronic and irreversible nature of the fibrosis, the lack of indices properly evaluating the treatment response, and the heterogeneity of the trial participants10,11. Hence there is a need for a systematic, in-depth view of the status of currently used or investigational drugs in the mechanistic network of disease. Analyzing drug action from the viewpoint of network biology may provide insights into how we can improve drug discovery and use in complex diseases such as SSc.

In this study, we analyzed the relationship between currently used and potential drugs and SSc-associated subnetworks, using proximity measures in an unsupervised and unbiased network-based framework. First, we explored the distance from key molecules, which are targeted by the drugs, to the SSc-associated genes. Then we concentrated on the pertinent pathways and associated biological processes, based on the distance metrics with a focus on the degree to which the drug-perturbed pathways cover pathogenic processes of SSc. Finally, we investigated how the drugs work to disturb the network of the disease module, validated the simulated drug actions in the gene-expression profiles of SSc skin tissue, and considered how this result could be applied to clinical research or practice.

## Results

### SSc-associated genes and enriched biological processes

The overarching methodology for our data collection and proximity analysis performed was depicted in Fig. 1. We identified the 179 SSc-associated genes from the Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI)12, the DisGeNET13, and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)14 (Supplementary Table 1). In the human interactome network, the largest connected component (LCC) consisted of 88 SSc-associated genes, 20 genes that were paired off and 71 genes that were scattered (Fig. 2a). Enriched biological processes for the 179 SSc-associated genes were searched using the DAVID[The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery] tool15, resulting in 55 gene ontology (GO)-biological process terms. Chemokine synthesis, apoptosis-associated processes, the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling pathway, extracellular matrix organization, and some immune response-related processes (MHC class II biosynthesis process, T-cell proliferation) were captured as the main features (Fig. 2b). This result indicates that the list of genes and molecules studied to-date as involved in the pathogenesis of SSc is incomplete and that there are missing nodes and links.

### Proximity between the SSc-targeted drugs and SSc-associated genes in the interactome

Currently used and potential drugs for SSc were identified from the literature10,16,17,18 and drug-target information was gathered from the DrugBank database19 (Supplementary Table 2). Anti-diabetic agents, H2 receptor blockers, and statins were compared as controls because these drugs are far from the mechanistic features of SSc. The relative proximity between the drugs and the SSc-associated genes is plotted in Fig. 3a. The relative proximity between the drugs and the SSc-associated genes is plotted in Fig. 3a. Anti-diabetic agents and H2-receptor blockers were located far from the SSc-associated genes, whereas statins were probably proximal to the SSc-associated genes (zc <  −1.282, P value < 0.10). Rituximab, abatacept, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ agonists, and cannabinoids were not significantly adjacent to the SSc-associated genes. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor blockers, and some of the immunosuppressive agents (sirolimus, tocilizumab and methotrexate), prostacyclin analogs (tranilast and iloprost), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TyKIs: ninedanib, imatinib and dasatinib) and hydroxyfasudil were all found to be located significantly proximal to the SSc-associated genes (zc <  −1.645, P value < 0.05).

### Proximity between SSc-targeted drugs and SSc-relevant pathways

To investigate further the network-based mechanism of drug action, we examined the pathways that are proximal to the SSc-targeted drugs using the gene sets of the KEGG [Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes] and Reactome pathways20,21. We curated the SSc-relevant pathways or processes from the literatures22,23,24,25,26. Figure 3b depicts the heatmap analysis for the SSc-relevant pathways (see the Supplementary Table 3 for the detailed values). TyKIs, such as dasatinib, imatinib and nintedanib, significantly covered the broadest range of the signaling and extracellular-matrix organizing pathways (zc <  −1.645, P value < 0.05): toll-like receptor signaling pathway, chemokine-, JAK-STAT-, Fc-εRI-, B-cell receptor-, vascular endothelia growth factor (VEGF)-, mTOR-, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-, type I and II interferon-signaling pathways and keratan sulfate/chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate biosynthesis. Among the TyKIs, nilotinib showed the weakest accessibility to the SSc-relevant pathways. Nilotinib was defined to target only two tyrosine kinases, ABL1 and KIT, whereas the TyKIs listed above had 9 or 10 molecular targets (see the Supplementary Table 2). Endothelin receptor blockers were found to be located close to chemokine-, VEGF-, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1-, Apelin- and sphingolipid-signaling pathways (zc < −1.645, P value < 0.05), but not significantly close to extracellular-matrix organizing processes, which is consistent with previous results27,28,29. Among the immunosuppressive agents, methotrexate, sirolimus and tocilizumab showed the potential to perturb extracellular-matrix organization by interfering with biosynthesis of glycosaminoglycans. Halofuginone, having two targets, COL1A1 and MMP2, was significantly close to extracellular-matrix organizing processes.

### Disease module identification

Known disease-associated genes tend to be investigated most extensively, which might introduce a bias and, thereby, produce an incomplete explanation of the disease pathogenesis. To counter that limitation, we based the disease module on the established SSc-associated genes. A cluster of 88 highly interconnected seed genes was observed on the interactome of the 179 SSc-associated genes from three sources12,13,14 shown in Fig. 2a, which we called the “proto-module”. Proteins that are involved in the same disease tend to interact with each other30. We prioritized the putative SSc-relevant genes forming the disease module on the interactome using the Disease Module Detection (DIAMOnD) algorithm (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 4)31,32. The DIAMOnD algorithm prioritizes the proteins in the network based on their topological proximity to seed proteins. Hence, the order in which the DIAMOnD proteins are selected can be interpreted as a network-based ranking criterion. DIAMOnD ranks the entire network in consecutive order and we, therefore, needed an additional stopping criterion to define the boundary of the disease module. For this, we used four different SSc-specific validation details: human SSc gene expression data, gene-sets from the KEGG and Reactome pathways, and GO-biological process terms. The first item comprises the differentially expressed genes, and the three latter items were assembled from the significantly enriched pathways or processes, based on the SSc-associated seed genes. The DIAMOnD gene in each iteration was considered a “hit” if it was incorporated in the gene-sets. (Fig. 4b). There was no further significant gain beyond the 450th iteration in terms of hit rate and P value (Fig. 4b), so 450 DIAMOnD genes were added to the 179 seed genes to make the final SSc disease module (Fig. 4c). The top 30 hits are listed in Fig. 4d. The SSc disease module from the KEGG pathways was most strongly enriched with the MAPK-signaling pathway (P value = 2.85 × 10−80), PI3K-Akt-signaling pathway (P value = 8.09 × 10−69) and tumor necrosis factr (TNF)-signaling pathway (P value = 1.55 × 10−64), followed by the chemokine-signaling pathway (P value = 7.70 × 10−42), Fcε RI-signaling pathway (P value = 3.32 × 10−45) and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway (P value = 2.09 × 10−40).

### Perturbation of disease modules by drugs

To understand the pathways or cellular processes, as guided by the disease module, we performed functional enrichment analysis for all seed and DIAMOnD genes, using the DAVID software15 and constructed the enrichment map33. The graph of enriched GO-biological processes was made up of 160 nodes with 1,086 edges, and the LCC comprised 155 nodes (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 1). To check how close a drug was to each node enough to perturb the process, we calculated the network-based proximity of drug targets to the gene set of each node in the same way for disease and pathway proteins. We regarded the node proximal to a certain drug (zc < −1.282, P value < 0.10) as being perturbed.

In an attempt to understand the mechanisms of action of the respective drugs, we analyzed the biological processes and molecular functions of the GO terms in the disease network. To illustrate, nintedanib, the most perturbing agent for this network, is cited as an example. The terms most proximal to nintedanib were ‘JAK-STAT cascade’ (zc = −6.11, P value < 1 × 10−5), ‘regulation of interferon-γ-mediated signaling pathway’ (zc = −5.45, P value < 1 × 10−5), ‘regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling’ (zc = −4.87, P value < 1 × 10−5), and ‘TNF-mediated signaling pathway’ (zc = −4.42, P value < 1 × 10−5). Nintedanib perturbed 83 (51.8%) nodes, which are shown in red in Fig. 5b. The distribution of nodes perturbed by each drug is provided in Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 2.

In a network context, robustness refers to the system’s ability to carry out its basic functions even with the breakdown of some network nodes or links. The connectivity of the LCC is regarded as the foundation of robustness34. To investigate the robustness of the disease-module network, we computed the evolution of the size of the LCC under random failures of network nodes (Fig. 5d)34,35. Our results (1,000 simulations) argue that half of the network would collapse when at least 27% of the nodes are disturbed, on average. Nintedanib showed the most perturbing activity (51.8%), followed by imatinib (40.6%), dasatinib (38.1%) and acetylcysteine (36.2%).

### Clinical response in SSc patients receiving nilotinib therapy

To test the applicability of network-based proximity of drugs, we imported the gene expression dataset of SSc skin tissues, which was obtained from 6 SSc patients on 2 separate occasions, before and after 12 months of treatment with nilotinib (GSE65405)36. To compare the paired samples before and after nilotinib treatment, a single sample version of gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to generate enrichment scores for gene sets of SSc-relevant pathways or processes. Patients with a decrease in modified Rodnan skin score > 20% from baseline to 12 months were defined as improvers36. An intrinsic molecular subset was assigned according to the previous study37, and three fibroproliferative, two inflammatory, and one normal-like subsets were identified. All patients in the inflammatory and normal-like subsets, and in one of the three fibroproliferative subsets were classified as improvers. Seven main signaling pathways or processes targeted by nilotinib on the SSc disease-module network were compared for the improvement and intrinsic subsets (Fig. 6). A decreasing pattern was found in most of the improvers (Fig. 6a), and was particularly notable in the two inflammatory subsets (Fig. 6b).

## Discussion

Advances in high-throughput platforms, the continuing accumulation of knowledge about diseases, and the availability of organized biomedical data add to the clinical and mechanistic insights into disease from a wide and systemic perspective38,39. The resolution of tissue fibrosis remains an unmet clinical need in patients with SSc. In the present study, we tried to understand the disease and currently used and potential drugs’ action in terms of network biology, to reduce the gaps in the existing knowledge, and to provide clues into the challenging issue in SSc.

One hundred seventy-nine SSc-associated genes were identified from the database. Eighty-eight molecules constituted the largest subnetwork and others were sparsely connected or isolated on the interactome. This contributed to an incomplete interactome, false positives and missing disease genes32. Moreover, enriched processes of those genes were limited to chemokine synthesis, apoptosis-associated processes, the TGF-β signaling pathway, extracellular-matrix organization, and some immune response-related processes (MHC class II biosynthesis process and T-cell proliferation), and they do not fully cover the current knowledge about SSc. To make up for the lack of completeness, we reconstituted the SSc disease module using the DIAMOnD algorithm, and the final SSc disease module and enriched processes better explained the pathophysiology of SSc. It is noteworthy that SP140, FN141, and apoptosis-related molecules including BCL2 family42, the emerging small molecular targets of SSc, were incorporated early by priority into DIAMOnD genes, although those were not assigned as seed genes. In particular, it is notable that inhibition of BCL-XL reversed the established fibrosis in a mouse model of SSc by inducing myofibroblast apoptosis, and that that provided a new therapeutic avenue for treating SSc42. Taken together, this principle of disease gene prioritization might be applicable to discovering novel or critical molecules involved in the development of SSc but not well-defined before.

To understand the action of drugs and their status with relation to SSc on the interactome, the proximity between drug targets and disease genes was evaluated. Proximity between the currently used or potential drugs and disease genes was variable and not all of the proximity value showed statistical significance. Non-significant closeness would mean that the drug’s targets are located far from the disease module or that the drug has an indirect effect on the disease module. It could be also ascribed to its different target among the etiopathogenetic domains (immune-inflammatory, vascular, or fibrotic process) or to its limited indication for a specific clinical manifestation (interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension or cutaneous involvement). Proximity of the pathways offered a complementary explanation for this difference. Endothelin receptor blockers exhibited a good proximity to disease genes as a whole, but were limited to several key pathways such as VEGF- and HIF-1-signaling pathways. In contrast, TyKIs, especially those with multiple targets, approached disease genes through multiple pathways, including both inflammatory and extracellular-matrix organizing processes. Even as a control, statins showed a fair proximity to disease genes and several pro-fibrosing pathways. Statins have been reported to be associated with the development and exacerbation of lung fibrosis43,44.

We investigated the size and range of the disease module differentially covered by each drug, to understand its mode of action and topology in the network-based framework. We noticed variable sizes and differential coverage of the disease network by the drugs. This helped provide a comprehensive view of each drug’s action and repercussions within the disease module. As a single agent, nintedanib showed the best performance in perturbing the disease module, followed by imatinib, dasatinib, and acetylcysteine. Acetylcysteine, a precursor of the antioxidant glutathione, was defined to target ACY1, CHUK, GSS, IKBKB, SLC7A11 and the glutamate receptor family. In a randomized controlled trial, the addition of acetylcysteine to prednisone and azathioprine worked in preserving pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis45 although this is not generally recommended due to the concern for harmful effects46. Acetylcysteine may be more beneficial in individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with specific genotype such as TOLLIP47. This approach can also be applied to estimation of the combined or synergistic effects across drugs. Combinations of two drugs could create a synergistic or additive effect if their coverage for the disease-module network is complementary to each other, and could increase the success rates of drug repositioning48.

TyKIs were promising agents because experimental studies in murine models of SSc have shown that TyKIs can prevent the development of fibrosis16, and this was corroborated by our network-based simulation. But discrepancies exist between encouraging preclinical results and disappointing clinical trials11. A vital clue can be obtained from a pilot study using the gene expression dataset of SSc skin tissues, which was obtained from 6 SSc patients receiving 12 months of nilotinib treatment36. Effective suppression of the SSc-relevant pathways and good response alleviating the skin fibrosis was observed in the inflammatory subsets of SSc patients. This implied that TyKIs are more effective in on-going pro-fibrotic inflammation and less in the fibroproliferative phase over the threshold. Lower effectiveness could partly be attributed to the lower dose (400 mg qd, rather than 400 mg q12 hour for chronic myeloid leukemia)36, the narrow selectivity of nilotinib targets and the low levels of the target molecules49. Unfortunately, toxicity and tolerability issues limited the further use of imatinib and nilotinib11. Taken together, TyKIs with less selectivity and a broad range of tyrosine kinase targets, such as dasatinib and nintedanib, would have greater efficacy and less toxicity, especially in the subset of SSc patients in the early inflammatory phase. This could guide clinical trial design and subgroup analysis.

Our results argue that network-based drug-disease proximity offers a novel perspective into a drug’s therapeutic effect in the refined disease module. In our network-based model, many drugs failed to have a comprehensive capability to subdue the SSc disease module although they are able to perturb a few key pro-fibrosing pathways. This limitation could be overcome with combination therapy or the use of drugs with multifarious activities, like TyKIs. In this work, we investigated just one of the dimensions that need to be taken into account when determining the feasibility of drugs for each case, as the actual clinical outcome is determined by a plethora of variables, including disease status, genetic susceptibility, comorbidity, pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics. Significant additional research is needed to translate these findings into clinical applications.

## Methods

### The human interactome

A previous study30 constructed a model of the human interactome based on its protein–protein interaction (PPI) network built based on the experimentally documented human physical interactions from the reputable database21,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57, as well as a separately published large-scale signaling network58. This human interactome dataset contains 141,150 interactions among 13,329 proteins, and was found to perform better in capturing the therapeutic effect of drugs than did functional networks from STRING59 and other high-throughput binary screens8. We used this human interactome network as the basis for conducting our proximity analysis.

### Systemic sclerosis-associated genes and drug targets

SSc-associated genes were retrieved from PheGenI12, DisGeNET13, and CTD14. Forty-five, 70 and 105 genes were found to be associated with SSc in PheGenI, DisGeNET, and the CTD, respectively. One hundred seventy-nine unique genes belong to human interactome elements (Supplementary Table 1). Information on drug-target molecules was extracted from the DrugBank database (Supplementary Table 2)19.

### Network-based proximity measure

To quantify the network-based relationship between drug targets and disease proteins, we used the metric of closest proximity dc, which is defined as the average shortest path-length between the drug’s targets and the nearest disease protein8. Briefly, given S, the set of disease proteins, T, the set of drug targets and d(s, t), the shortest path-length between nodes s and t in the network, dc between S and T is given by:

$$d_{{c\left( {S,T} \right)}} = \frac{1}{T}\mathop \sum \limits_{t \in T} m{\text{i}}n_{s \in s} {\text{d}}\left( {s,t} \right)$$

To evaluate the significance of the network distance between a drug and a given disease, we constructed a reference distance distribution corresponding to the expected distance between two randomly selected groups of proteins of the same size and degree distribution as the original disease proteins and drug targets in the network. This procedure was repeated 1,000 times. The mean d and standard deviation (σd) of the reference distribution were used to calculate a z-score (zd) by converting an observed (non-Euclidean) distance to a normalized (non-Euclidean) distance. The detailed description of network proximity was provided in the previous study8. According to the standard normal distribution, if zc ≤  −1.645 (one-sided P value < 0.05), a drug was considered to be significantly proximal to the disease and if zc ≤  −1.282 (one-sided P value < 0.10), a drug was considered to be probably proximal to the disease.

### Network-based pathway proximity analysis

To identify the biological pathways affected by a drug in the human interactome, we used the closest distance measure to assess the proximity between drugs and pathways. The drug pathway proximity is the normalized distance between the drug targets and the proteins belonging to a given pathway. As in our calculation of drug-disease proximity, 1,000 randomly selected protein sets, matching the original protein sets in size and network degree, were used to calculate the mean and the standard deviation of the z-score. We used gene sets from all of the KEGG21 and Reactome pathways20.

### Disease module detection method

To derive the SSc-specific disease module in the human interactome, we used the Disease Module Detection (DIAMOnD) algorithm31,32, which is robust over a wide range of noise and shows superior performance relative to other methods. This algorithm is based on the observation that potential disease genes have a propensity to interact with the known disease genes, and prioritizes the proteins in the network based on their topological proximity to seed proteins30. The detailed description of DIAMOnD algorithm was provided in the previous studies31,32.

This analysis identified the statistically significant enrichment of SSc-relevant genes among the designated DIAMOnD genes. Because there was no significant further gain beyond 450 iterations, we considered the first 450 DIAMOnD genes to have the most significant SSc association (Supplementary Table 4). The module, the LCC in the network, which started at 88 directly connected seed genes, was incremented by 450 DIAMOnD genes and was further connected to 62 isolated seed genes through the link by DIAMOnD genes. As a result, a putative SSc disease module of 600 genes, in total, was created.

### Validation of DIAMOnD genes

To determine the cut-off size of DIAMOnD genes, we used four SSc-relevant validation datasets: the SSc gene expression data, gene sets from KEGG and Reactome pathways and GO biological process terms. To obtain RA gene expression data, we searched the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, January 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and ArrayExpress database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) for all gene expression datasets using ‘systemic sclerosis’ and ‘skin tissue’ as a search term, resulting in eight publicly available human microarray datasets. Because there was a trade-off between the number of studies to include and the number of genes that are within the intersection from all datasets, we optimized the product of the two by selecting the point where those two trends crossed. We finally selected 8 expression datasets with GEO series (GSE) IDs: GSE58095, GSE76806, GSE66321, GSE65405, GSE32413, GSE45485, GSE59785 and GSE76807. The complete collection included 423 skin samples from 175 SSc patients and 61 healthy controls. After normalizing and removing the batch effect, we performed differential expression analysis and selected the gene candidates that were identified in each of three independent methods (empirical Bayes, significance analysis of microarrays, and ranked product), and finally filtered the 2,175 up-regulated genes. The gene sets of KEGG, Reactome pathways and GO terms that were significantly enriched within the given set of seed genes were obtained using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) version 6.8 software and the Reactome Analysis tool (P value < 0.05)15,20. Each DIAMOnD gene was considered a “hit” if it had at least one annotation that was in the gene sets significantly enriched within the seed genes (Fisher’s exact test, P value < 0.05). To compensate for the dependence of P values on the underlying set size, we used a sliding-window approach: at each iteration step i, we considered all DIAMOnD genes in the interval [i − 179/2, i + 179/2], thereby obtaining sets of the same size as the seed genes, which could be compared with each other.

### Assessment of network robustness

To assess the robustness of the networks against attack, we used iterative ‘random’ and ‘targeted’ removal of nodes34,35. Nodes were deleted randomly from the graph irrespective of the degree of the node, or only the nodes targeted by the drugs were selectively removed. After each deletion, we computed the evolution of the size of the LCC, which means the minimum path-length under a random or targeted attack of a graph. This indicates how much the drug can disrupt the network of the disease module.

### Functional enrichment analysis

We performed functional enrichment analysis focusing on the genes of interest using DAVID software15. Terms were considered to be significant if the P value was less than 0.01, the gene count more than 3 and the fold enrichment larger than 1.5. The Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) score was transformed using the absolute base-10 logarithm of the P value. The enrichment results were visualized with the Enrichment Map format, where nodes represent gene sets and weighted links between the nodes represent an overlap score, which depends on the number of genes that the two gene sets share (Jaccard coefficient)33. To intuitively identify redundancies between gene sets, the nodes were connected if their contents overlapped by more than 10%.

### Single sample gene-set enrichment analysis

To test for gene enrichment in individual samples from SSc patients, we used a single sample version of gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), which defines an enrichment score as the degree of absolute enrichment of a gene set in each sample within a given dataset60. The gene expression values for a given sample were rank-normalized and an enrichment score was produced using the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions of the genes in the signature and the remaining genes. This procedure is similar to the GSEA technique, but the list is ranked by absolute expression in one sample.

### Statistical analysis

For continuous distributed data, between-group comparisons were performed using a paired or unpaired t-test. Categorical or dichotomous variables were compared using a chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were conducted in R (version 3.5.2, The R Project for Statistical Computing, www.r-project.org).

## Data availability

The SSc skin transcriptomic datasets used in this study are freely available on the GEO data portal under the access GSE58095, GSE76806, GSE66321, GSE65405, GSE32413, GSE45485, GSE59785 and GSE76807.

## References

1. 1.

Yi, S. et al. Functional variomics and network perturbation: Connecting genotype to phenotype in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.8 (2017).

2. 2.

Kim, Y. A., Wuchty, S. & Przytycka, T. M. Identifying causal genes and dysregulated pathways in complex diseases. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001095 (2011).

3. 3.

Schadt, E. E. Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases. Nature 461, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08454 (2009).

4. 4.

Csermely, P., Korcsmaros, T., Kiss, H. J., London, G. & Nussinov, R. Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery: a comprehensive review. Pharmacol. Ther. 138, 333–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 (2013).

5. 5.

Segura-Cabrera, A., Singh, N. & Komurov, K. An integrated network platform for contextual prioritization of drugs and pathways. Mol. Biosyst. 11, 2850–2859. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mb00444f (2015).

6. 6.

Zhang, B., Tian, Y. & Zhang, Z. Network biology in medicine and beyond. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 7, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1161/circgenetics.113.000123 (2014).

7. 7.

Philippi, S. & Kohler, J. Addressing the problems with life-science databases for traditional uses and systems biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1872 (2006).

8. 8.

Guney, E., Menche, J., Vidal, M. & Barabasi, A. L. Network-based in silico drug efficacy screening. Nat. Commun. 7, 10331. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10331 (2016).

9. 9.

Allanore, Y. et al. Systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 1, 15002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.2 (2015).

10. 10.

Allanore, Y., Matucci-Cerinic, M. & Distler, O. Treatment of systemic sclerosis: Is there any hope for the future?. RMD Open 2, e000260. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000260 (2016).

11. 11.

Denton, C. P. & Ong, V. H. Targeted therapies for systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 9, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.46 (2013).

12. 12.

Ramos, E. M. et al. Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): Synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resources. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 22, 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.96 (2014).

13. 13.

Pinero, J. et al. DisGeNET: A discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes. Database Oxford https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav028 (2015).

14. 14.

Davis, A. P. et al. Comparative toxicogenomics database: A knowledgebase and discovery tool for chemical-gene-disease networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D786-792. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn580 (2009).

15. 15.

da Huang, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211 (2009).

16. 16.

Ramos-Casals, M., Fonollosa-Pla, V., Brito-Zeron, P. & Siso-Almirall, A. Targeted therapy for systemic sclerosis: How close are we?. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.48 (2010).

17. 17.

Yanaba, K. Strategy for treatment of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: Present and future. J. Dermatol. 43, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13026 (2016).

18. 18.

Distler, O. & Cozzio, A. Systemic sclerosis and localized scleroderma–current concepts and novel targets for therapy. Semin. Immunopathol. 38, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-015-0551-z (2016).

19. 19.

Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: A knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D901-906. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm958 (2008).

20. 20.

Fabregat, A. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D481-487. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1351 (2016).

21. 21.

Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D353-d361. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1092 (2017).

22. 22.

Besliu, A. et al. Peripheral blood lymphocytes analysis detects CD100/SEMA4D alteration in systemic sclerosis patients. Autoimmunity 44, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.3109/08916934.2010.541171 (2011).

23. 23.

Bhattacharyya, S., Wei, J. & Varga, J. Understanding fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: Shifting paradigms, emerging opportunities. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2011.149 (2011).

24. 24.

Ho, Y. Y., Lagares, D., Tager, A. M. & Kapoor, M. Fibrosis—A lethal component of systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 10, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.53 (2014).

25. 25.

Yokoyama, Y. et al. Inhibitory regulation of skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis by apelin/APJ signaling. Arthritis. Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40533 (2018).

26. 26.

Yoshizaki, A. et al. Treatment with rapamycin prevents fibrosis in tight-skin and bleomycin-induced mouse models of systemic sclerosis. Arthritis. Rheum. 62, 2476–2487. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27498 (2010).

27. 27.

Davenport, A. P. et al. Endothelin. Pharmacol. Rev. 68, 357–418. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011833 (2016).

28. 28.

Melgar-Lesmes, P. et al. Apelin mediates the induction of profibrogenic genes in human hepatic stellate cells. Endocrinology 151, 5306–5314. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0754 (2010).

29. 29.

Ohanian, J., Forman, S. P., Katzenberg, G. & Ohanian, V. Endothelin-1 stimulates small artery VCAM-1 expression through p38MAPK-dependent neutral sphingomyelinase. J. Vasc. Res. 49, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336649 (2012).

30. 30.

Menche, J. et al. Disease networks. Uncovering disease-disease relationships through the incomplete interactome. Science 347, 125–7601. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257601 (2015).

31. 31.

Ghiassian, S. D., Menche, J. & Barabasi, A. L. A DIseAse MOdule Detection (DIAMOnD) algorithm derived from a systematic analysis of connectivity patterns of disease proteins in the human interactome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004120. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004120 (2015).

32. 32.

Sharma, A. et al. A disease module in the interactome explains disease heterogeneity, drug response and captures novel pathways and genes in asthma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 3005–3020. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv001 (2015).

33. 33.

Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A. & Bader, G. D. Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 5, e13984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013984 (2010).

34. 34.

Barabási, A. L. & Pòsfai, M. Ã. Network Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).

35. 35.

Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabasi, A. L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019 (2000).

36. 36.

Gordon, J. K. et al. Nilotinib (Tasigna) in the treatment of early diffuse systemic sclerosis: An open-label, pilot clinical trial. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 17, 213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0721-3 (2015).

37. 37.

Milano, A. et al. Molecular subsets in the gene expression signatures of scleroderma skin. PLoS ONE 3, e2696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002696 (2008).

38. 38.

Pe’er, D. & Hacohen, N. Principles and strategies for developing network models in cancer. Cell 144, 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.001 (2011).

39. 39.

Furlong, L. I. Human diseases through the lens of network biology. Trends Genet. 29, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2012.11.004 (2013).

40. 40.

Ihn, H. & Tamaki, K. Increased phosphorylation of transcription factor Sp1 in scleroderma fibroblasts: Association with increased expression of the type I collagen gene. Arthritis. Rheum. 43, 2240–2247. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200010)43:10<2240::Aid-anr11>3.0.Co;2-2 (2000).

41. 41.

Bhattacharyya, S. et al. FibronectinEDA promotes chronic cutaneous fibrosis through Toll-like receptor signaling. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 232ra250. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008264 (2014).

42. 42.

Lagares, D. et al. Targeted apoptosis of myofibroblasts with the BH3 mimetic ABT-263 reverses established fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3765 (2017).

43. 43.

Xu, J. F. et al. Statins and pulmonary fibrosis: The potential role of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 185, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201108-1574OC (2012).

44. 44.

Fernandez, A. B., Karas, R. H., Alsheikh-Ali, A. A. & Thompson, P. D. Statins and interstitial lung disease: A systematic review of the literature and of food and drug administration adverse event reports. Chest 134, 824–830. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0943 (2008).

45. 45.

Demedts, M. et al. High-dose acetylcysteine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2229–2242. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042976 (2005).

46. 46.

Raghu, G. et al. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis an update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 192, e3–e19. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201506-1063ST (2015).

47. 47.

Oldham, J. M. et al. TOLLIP, MUC5B, and the response to N-Acetylcysteine among Individuals with Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 192, 1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201505-1010OC (2015).

48. 48.

Sun, W., Sanderson, P. E. & Zheng, W. Drug combination therapy increases successful drug repositioning. Drug Discov. Today 21, 1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.015 (2016).

49. 49.

Maurer, B. et al. Levels of target activation predict antifibrotic responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 2039–2046. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203729 (2013).

50. 50.

Chatr-Aryamontri, A. et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D369-d379. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1102 (2017).

51. 51.

Duarte, N. C. et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1777–1782. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610772104 (2007).

52. 52.

Hornbeck, P. V. et al. PhosphoSitePlus: A comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D261-270. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1122 (2012).

53. 53.

Kerrien, S. et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D841-846. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1088 (2012).

54. 54.

Keshava Prasad, T. S. et al. Human protein reference database—2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D767–D772. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn892 (2009).

55. 55.

Licata, L. et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D857-861. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr930 (2012).

56. 56.

Matys, V. et al. TRANSFAC: Transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 374–378 (2003).

57. 57.

Ruepp, A. et al. CORUM: The comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes—2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D497-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp914 (2010).

58. 58.

Vinayagam, A. et al. A directed protein interaction network for investigating intracellular signal transduction. Sci Signal 4, rs8. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001699 (2011).

59. 59.

Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein–protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D362-d368. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw937 (2017).

60. 60.

Barbie, D. A. et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 462, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08460 (2009).

## Acknowledgments

We thank Claire Barnes, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

K-J Kim and I Tagkopoulos conceived the idea and designed the study. Ki-Jo Kim and S-J Moon carried out data collection. K-J Kim performed the computational analysis. K-J Kim, S-J Moon, and K-S Park analyzed and interpreted the data. K-J Kim, K-S Park, and I Tagkopoulos wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to its revision. I Tagkopoulos supervised all aspects of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ki-Jo Kim or Ilias Tagkopoulos.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Kim, KJ., Moon, SJ., Park, KS. et al. Network-based modeling of drug effects on disease module in systemic sclerosis. Sci Rep 10, 13393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70280-y

• Accepted:

• Published: