Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Uncovering unique plasticity in life history of an endangered centenarian fish

## Abstract

The ability to adapt to changing environments is fundamental for species persistence. Both plasticity and genetic selection are potential drivers that allow for traits to be advantageous, thus leading to increases in survival or fitness. Identifying phenotypic plasticity in life history traits of long-lived organisms can be difficult owing to high survival, long generation times, and few studies at sufficient spatial and temporal scales to elicit a plastic response within a population. To begin to understand phenotypic plasticity of a long-lived freshwater fish in response to environmental conditions, we used a long-term data set consisting of over 1,200 mark-recapture events to inform our understanding of dynamic rate functions and life history attributes. Furthermore, we used a common garden experimental approach to confirm whether changes in life history traits are in response to plasticity in the reaction norm or are genetically derived. Using these approaches, we demonstrated differences in life history traits among Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) occupying river segments of varying physical and hydrological stress. The common garden experiment corroborated plastic phenotypic expression in reaction norms for age at first maturity, longevity, fecundity, and maximum size. These growth-mediated attributes resulted in differences in overall fitness traits, where Pallid Sturgeon fecundity was greater than a tenfold difference and 3–6 times the number of life-time spawning events. Anthropogenic modifications to river form and function are likely responsible for the variation in life history attributes resulting from an increased metabolic demand for maintaining station, foraging, and migration. Collectively, our approach provided surprising insight into the capabilities of a centenarian fish to dramatically respond to a changing environment.

## Introduction

Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of an organism to display various phenotypes in the event of environmental change. Plasticity in life history traits allow organisms the ability to adapt to stochastic conditions by matching growth, maturity, and longevity to in situ biotic or abiotic conditions, thereby providing the most advantageous strategy for completing its life cycle and contributing progeny1,2. Reaction norms are genetically based gradients of life history traits that can be expressed across environmental factors such as temperature or predation3,4,5. Estimating the reaction norms for phenotypic traits is important for understanding how populations function across spatial scales, calibrating size- and age-structured population models, and estimating species persistence to disturbance. Plasticity is adaptive when environments fluctuate temporally or spatially but can be maladaptive when the costs of plasticity outweigh its potential benefits or when selection narrows the norm of reaction1,6,7. For example, Trinidadian guppies displayed plastic responses in fitness metrics when exposed to predation, but those characteristics were selected for and became inherent in subsequent generations thereby shifting both life history traits and reducing future plasticity5. Thus, phenotypic plasticity and possible subsequent genetic selection may allow for increased survival and fitness in novel environments but may lead to reduced adaptability through time. Therefore, knowing the ability of species to adjust (phenotypic plasticity) or adapt (genetic selection) to large-scale anthropogenic changes in environments is fundamental for species persistence and maintaining biodiversity within the Anthropocene.

Changes in life history traits in response to harvest or environmental change have been documented for several species of fish [8,9, among others]. For example, various stocks of Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) have shown marked changes in age at sexual maturation, fecundity, and longevity in response to commercial over-harvest9. Moreover, anthropogenic alterations to aquatic environments have been linked to both community shifts in life history strategies [e.g.,10] and within-population variation in life history traits among varying environments11. Environmental disturbance can cause acute mortality, create additional stressors, or change resource allocation1,12, these effects can institute phenotypic changes in the population through increased mortality, physiological allostasis, or resource limitations13,14. Ultimately, growth rates are impacted by environmental disturbances and are the physiological mechanism for which variation in life history traits exist15,16,17. Faster growth early in life—whether density-dependent or density-independent—is how earlier sexual maturation can be attained and ultimately, a reduction in overall size and longevity9,11.

Common garden experiments help researchers understand the complex role among phenotype, genotype, and the environment. Typical common garden experiments occur where different populations are reared under the same environmental conditions to reduce the effect of environmental differences (e.g., latitude, altitude, or climate) on the phenotype, thus subsequent phenotypic changes that persist are assumed to be genetic18,19. Theoretically, the reciprocal experiment—where the same population of fish are exposed to different environmental conditions—can help to elucidate whether changes in life history traits are in response to plasticity in the reaction norm or are genetically derived. Challenges in these designs are that laboratory settings may not replicate cumulative environmental effects20 whereas in natura experiments may be difficult to assess due to low capture probabilities or the ability to control environmental factors21. Therefore, observing phenotypic plasticity and understanding factors responsible for shifts in life history traits in natural populations is challenging due to the inherent difficulties in experimental scope (large size of an experiment) and replication inasmuch as environmental constraints22,23.

Plasticity of reaction norms is unknown for long-lived fishes with specialized traits adapted from long-term survival in predictably variable environments (i.e., periodic strategists24. Periodic strategists pose challenges in determining the benefits of local adaptations or plasticity because generations of these species may span a century or more and are typically less abundant than short-lived generalist species25,26. With global environmental change—such as physical habitat modification and climate change—occurring at an expedited rate, understanding the capacity of how long-lived fishes may respond or adapt is imperative27. Population introductions of long-lived fish with known phenotype and genotype is key for the examination of reaction norms from individuals subject to selective pressures (environmental change). Results from common garden experiments such as this allow one to determine plasticity in traits and to verify key measures of population dynamics (e.g., growth rate). The goal in this study was to assess how genetic selection or phenotypic plasticity can explain differences in key life history traits (i.e., age and size at maturation, longevity, and reproductive fitness) to variation in altered riverine landscapes—the Missouri River. We quantified key dynamic rate functions (i.e., growth and survival) of Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus)—a long-lived periodic strategist—throughout the Missouri River using mark-recapture data and a common garden experiment. The Missouri River has undergone varying levels (i.e., both spatially and temporally) of anthropogenic alteration over the last 70–90 years and it is unlikely that a single phenotype will result in the greatest fitness throughout the river system. Therefore, we predict that highly altered segments of the Missouri River will result in a reduction of various fitness traits compared to segments that mimic historical conditions.

## Background

### Pallid sturgeon life history

Pallid Sturgeon is a long-lived periodic-strategist that delays maturation and reproduction for several years—in some cases 10–20 years. Successive spawning events are infrequent and successful year classes likely occur only during years of optimal hydrological and climatological conditions. Pallid Sturgeon undergo ontogenetic shifts in diet where juveniles consume various macroinvertebrates28,29 and then begin to consume benthic fishes (primarily Cyprinids) following sexual maturation29,30. Early literature suggests that Pallid Sturgeon live to 41 y of age 31, but those estimates are based off age assignments from annuli deposition on pectoral fin rays which have been shown to provide inaccurate results32,33. Recent analyses utilizing bomb radiocarbon has indicated that Pallid Sturgeon from the upper Missouri River obtain an age of at least 65 years34. Pallid Sturgeon are estimated to become sexually mature from 10 to 17 years for females and 7 to 10 years for males and both sexes display an intermittent spawning cycle35.

### Distribution

Pallid Sturgeon was classified as a U.S. federally endangered species in September, 1990 due to habitat loss from reservoir construction and channelization36. Pallid Sturgeon are currently distributed throughout the upper and lower basins of the Missouri River (Fig. 1). In the upper Missouri River, fish are distributed in the riverine portions between reservoirs and within the lower Yellowstone River37,38. Pallid Sturgeon found in this region (hereafter referred to as Upper Basin,UB) are either large and presumably old fish that were likely present prior to dam construction, or hatchery propagated individuals that were stocked beginning in the late 1990s. In the lower Missouri River (below the lowermost reservoir dam,Gavins Point dam, South Dakota, USA), Pallid Sturgeon are present throughout the entire 1,305 km of unobstructed Missouri River to its confluence with the Mississippi River. Pallid Sturgeon in this reach of river (hereafter referred to as lower basin; LB) are generally smaller, where the large, relic Pallid Sturgeon (such as those found in the UB) are not present. However, wild Pallid Sturgeon of unknown age and origin exist, as well as hatchery progeny that were similarly stocked beginning in the late 1990s.

### Environments

#### Upper basin

Hospitable habitat in the UB consists of inter-reservoir reaches of free flowing (i.e., lack of channel control structures) river and large tributary inputs (i.e., Yellowstone River, Montana, USA). The unaltered Missouri River between Fort Peck dam and the headwaters of Lake Sakakawea is a 327 km stretch of river. Water temperature, turbidity, and flow dynamics are altered from deep-water releases from Fort Peck dam39,40, but river form resembles historic conditions below the confluence with the Yellowstone River (rkm 2,525.4)37.

#### Lower basin

The lower Missouri River is primarily channelized containing a swift, deep channel that is operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for navigation. However, immediately below Gavins Point dam, the first 95 km of river is void of channel maintenance structures and resembles historical physical conditions (e.g., braided channel and exposed sand bars) despite a 77% reduction in the number and area of historic side channels41. Flow and water chemistry are altered in this stretch of river as a result of deep-water releases from Gavins Point dam42. The remaining Missouri River downstream to the mouth is channelized, where a 3.2 m thalweg is maintained and operated for tug-boat navigation.

### Hatchery propagation

A major component to the Pallid Sturgeon recovery program was the creation of a propagation and augmentation program36. Wild origin Pallid Sturgeon are captured and transported to hatchery facilities to spawn in controlled environments. Progeny are reared to increase survival and later individually tagged (i.e., PIT tags) and released at various stocking locations to supplement the natural population. Protocols are in place to maintain a genetically diverse program and to categorize each individual fish through unique markings or tags43. Tag returns thus provide important information on genetics, movement, population dynamics, and abundance.

Propagation for Pallid Sturgeon began in 1992; however, large-scale stocking didn’t occur until 1999. From 1999 to 2007, all Pallid Sturgeon stocked into the UB and LB were produced from adult fish that were collected from the UB. In 2008, the Pallid Sturgeon recovery team enforced a moratorium on stocking hatchery-reared Pallid Sturgeon of UB origin into the LB for fear of genetic mixing with those that might immigrate to the Mississippi River. Therefore, stocking protocols established prior to 2009 unintentionally set up a common garden experiment where hatchery progeny produced from the same UB fish genetics were stocked into the UB and LB.

## Methods

A multi-agency long-term monitoring program routinely sampled the riverine portions of the UB and LB of the Missouri River from 2006 to 2016. Collection efforts included sampling with standardized sampling gears and effort during the spring, summer, and fall. See Wildhaber et al.44 for a complete description of sampling protocols. A fin clip tissue sample was collected from all unmarked Pallid Sturgeon captures to genetically identify origin (e.g., hatchery-reared vs. wild) and year class through analysis of microsatellite loci or mitochondrial single nucleotide polymorphism assays45,46. Length (fork length), weight (g), and tag number were routinely recorded on collected specimens.

### Age and growth

Age and growth of Pallid Sturgeon were needed to characterize important life history traits, such as size at maturation, maximum size, and longevity. Growth of Pallid Sturgeon was assessed as the increase in somatic growth (i.e., fork length) between capture events for each individual within a basin. A total of 1,264 individual mark-recapture events from both wild and hatchery-origin fish that were at-large for at least 30 days were included in this analysis. Annual growth increments of tagged individuals were calculated from the following equation:

$${G}_{i}=\frac{\left({L}_{r}-{L}_{t}\right)}{Y}$$

where Gi is growth for fish i, Lt is fork length at tagging, Lr is fork length at recapture, and Y is the number of years between capture events. Annual growth increment per 50 mm length bin was plotted by the initial length at first tagging to determine the size at which growth begins to asymptote for Pallid Sturgeon located within each basin.

Hatchery propagation and subsequent stocking of uniquely tagged fish has provided an important data set of relatively young, known-age fish. However, age information is still lacking for wild-originated fish, particularly long-lived adults. To resolve this data gap, age for Pallid Sturgeon of any given size was estimated with von Bertalanffy growth curve parameters derived from mark-recapture data 47. We used a modification of the Fabens 48 method where growth increment data were fitted to the von Bertalanffy growth curve reformulated to account for observed growth between capture periods, so that

$$\Delta L=\left({L}_{\infty }-{L}_{t}\right)\left(1- {e}^{-kT}\right)$$

where ΔL is the increase in length between capture events, t is time of tagging, T is the number of years between tagging and recapture, $${L}_{\infty }$$ is the von Bertalanffy length at infinity, and k is the von Bertalanffy growth rate coefficient. Parameters (± SE) for the von Bertalanffy growth curve were estimated iteratively using nonlinear regression (Gauss–Newton algorithm 49. An estimate of the time at length zero (t0) cannot be estimated with this method; therefore, we used the formula provided by Pauly 50:

$$\log \left( { - t_{0} } \right) = - 0.3922 - 0.2752\;log\;L_{\infty } - 1.038\;log\;k$$

Age (t) for Pallid Sturgeon of any given size (Lt) could then be estimated by using a reformulation of the von Bertalanffy Eq. 51:

$$t={t}_{0}-{log}_{e}\left[(1-{L}_{t}/{L}_{\infty })/k\right]$$

A growth curve was then generated with the von Bertalanffy growth parameters, predicted ages, and fork lengths of Pallid Sturgeon for each basin so as to compare length-at-age differences and to infer life history characteristics (i.e., maximum age and size, length at sexual maturity). Information about the age distribution could then be incorporated into estimates for survival and life expectancy. Total annual survival (S) was estimated with Hoenig’s estimator52:

$$S = {1}-{4}.{22}/T_{max} ,$$

where Tmax is the maximum age of fish within the population. Mean life expectancy was then calculated using the equation from Seber53

$$e_{0} = - 1/\ln \left( S \right),$$

where e0 is the mean life expectancy and S is annual survival. Data computations were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 of the SAS System (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina USA). Figures were created using SigmaPlot version 14, from Systat Software, Inc., San Jose California USA (www.systatsoftware.com).

### Common garden experiment

We examined hatchery-reared Pallid Sturgeon recaptures from the 2002 through 2008 year classes. These age groups represent fish that were produced from UB broodstock and stocked into both the UB and LB of the Missouri River. Additional year classes from earlier stockings (1997, 1998, 1999, and 2001) were included in the UB to increase sample size. There were 119 mark-recapture records of hatchery-reared fish from the UB and 355 hatchery-reared fish from the LB. Hatchery-reared Pallid Sturgeon were uniquely tagged prior to release and this information was utilized to determine hatch date, age, and stocking location. Fork length at age was compared among basins to examine differences in growth. Because these fish all come from UB broodstock, these results will be indicative of environmental effects on growth without confounding genetic influence.

### Reproductive information

The Pallid Sturgeon propagation and augmentation program annually collects adult size fish and assesses them for reproductive readiness. Pallid Sturgeon were assessed with ultrasound and endoscopology and those that were deemed reproductive were housed in hatchery facilities throughout the spawning process. Hatchery personnel recorded length, weight, and tag number (either new or old) prior to spawning. When spawning occurred, the number of eggs removed were recorded. Although this metric was not a measure of true fecundity, we assumed it was an accurate reflection of the reproductive potential of gravid female Pallid Sturgeon. Reproductive information was provided from Gavins Point National Fish Hatchery (Yankton, South Dakota, USA) in the LB and Garrison National Fish Hatchery (Bismarck, North Dakota, USA) in the UB.

### Ethics statement

Data collected for this study was from multiple U.S. state and federal agencies cooperatively working under the guidelines of the Pallid Sturgeon Population Assessment Program funded through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. All collection efforts followed the Pallid Sturgeon Handling Protocols approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the guidance of the Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Team. Each cooperating agency possessed independent federal and state endangered species collection permits required to obtain and possess Pallid Sturgeon.

## Results

### Common garden experiment

Mean length at age for hatchery-reared Pallid Sturgeon was markedly different between the UB and LB, despite hatchery-reared progeny originating from the same UB parentage (i.e., stocked into both the UB and LB). Pallid Sturgeon in the LB were larger at a given age until age-14 (Fig. 2). The growth trajectory of Pallid Sturgeon from the LB was steep until age-10 (approximately 800 mm), which is the size and age when hatchery personnel begin seeing fish become reproductively viable (Steffensen et al. 2013). After age-10, somatic growth abruptly declines where some fish grow little throughout the remainder of their life. For example, an adult Pallid Sturgeon recaptured in the LB in 2013 that had been at-large for 12 years displayed an annual growth rate of 6–7 mm per year. In the UB, the observed length at age was comparatively smaller until age-14, but growth continued on an upward trajectory beyond the inflection point of reduced growth for stocked fish from the LB. Collectively, these data indicate plasticity in the reaction norm of dynamic rate functions in hatchery-reared fish linked to the same parental group originating in the UB (Fig. 3).

### Age and growth

Analyses combining hatchery-reared and wild origin Pallid Sturgeon (n = 1,264) provided a means to characterize life history traits. Pallid Sturgeon displayed marked differences in maximum size, lifetime growth trajectories, and reproductive characteristics between the UB and the LB. Upper basin Pallid Sturgeon grew slowly throughout life, but that growth persisted until fish obtained large sizes and old ages. Conversely, Pallid Sturgeon from the LB grew relatively quickly at early ages (i.e., juvenile stage) until sexual maturation presumably occurred. Pallid Sturgeon thereafter grew little, corresponding to the reduced size in maximum length and overall longevity (Fig. 4). Assuming environmental influences heavily outweigh genetic disposition in wild-origin fish similar to what was discovered in our common garden experiment, we witnessed significant plasticity in reaction norms of life history traits (Fig. 3). Maximum size estimated from L-infinity was 1,219 mm (34.56 SE) and was corroborated from field observations of the largest fish ever collected during field sampling (1,197 mm) (Fig. 3d). Estimated age from mark-recapture data suggests that maximum expected age in the LB population was 39 years (95% CI 34–49). Pallid Sturgeon growth in the UB was characterized by a greater overall maximum length and increased longevity. The L-infinity parameter indicated a maximum size of 1,841 mm (112.80 SE) (Fig. 3d) and estimated age from mark-recapture data suggests that maximum expected age in the UB population was 100 y (95% CI 83–120).

Hatchery personnel reported female Pallid Sturgeon in the LB becoming sexually mature as early as age-1046 (Fig. 3c,Table 1) and at an approximate length of 750 mm. Female Pallid Sturgeon in the UB became sexually mature at age-1847 (Fig. 3c) and at an approximate length of 950 mm. The mean number of eggs extracted for spawning from female Pallid Sturgeon varied dramatically among basins and was related to the overall size (i.e., weight) of fish, where female Pallid Sturgeon from the UB weighed on average 21.6 (± 0.65) kg and female Pallid Sturgeon from the LB weighed on average 3.1 (± 0.17) kg (Table 1). Hatchery personnel extracted a mean of 121,175 (± 10,932) eggs (Fig. 3a) from female Pallid Sturgeon from the UB. In the LB, a mean of 14,531 (± 1,484) eggs (Fig. 3a) were extracted (Table 1). Recaptures of individual fish and assessing reproductive condition in subsequent years indicate that female Pallid Sturgeon spawn on a cycle of 2–3 years in the UB and 1–3 years in the LB54,55.

Annual survival estimates ranged from 89% (95% CI 87–91%) in the LB to 96% (95% CI 95–97%) in the UB (Table 1). The mean life expectancy of Pallid Sturgeon in the UB and LB was 56 years (95% CI 45–76 years) and 20 years (95% CI 17–24) (Fig. 3b). Combining life expectancy with reproductive information resulted in significant differences in fitness tradeoffs. Upper basin Pallid Sturgeon would result in approximately 13–20 spawning cycles (at 2–3 years intervals) for adult female Pallid Sturgeon and 3–11 spawning cycles (at 1–3 years intervals) in the LB. Lifetime reproductive output for females from the UB would therefore equate to 1.5e5–2.4e5 eggs produced compared to 53,280–87,186 eggs in the LB.

## Discussion

Contrasting habitat conditions among two sections of a large-river system altered growth patterns, and subsequent life history traits, of a long-lived species. Phenotypic plasticity was evident in reaction norms for age at first maturity, longevity, fecundity, and maximum size (Fig. 3). These growth-mediated attributes resulted in differences in overall fitness traits, where differences in Pallid Sturgeon fecundity was greater than a tenfold difference and many more life-time spawning events. Although long-lived species pose several limitations on examining a full complement of life history attributes (e.g., longevity and maximum size), our common garden experiment provided a means to corroborate growth patterns – assessed with mark-recapture data—of natural fish that have only ever been present within their respective basins. Collectively, our approach provided surprising insight into the capabilities of a possible centenarian fish to dramatically respond to a changing environment.

Anthropogenic modifications to river form and function are likely responsible for the variation in life history attributes of Pallid Sturgeon. The LB of the Missouri River is largely a homogenized system of uniform depths and velocities. Channelization of the Missouri River begins at rkm 1,213 and consists of river control structures (i.e., various dike structures) on the inside bends and revetted rock that armors the outside bend. This river modification scheme was designed to create a self-scouring channel that supports tug-boat navigation (i.e., creates at least a 2.7-m deep channel). As a result, mean depth and velocity has greatly increased over historic conditions39. The lack of shallow, slow water velocity habitat has been identified as a major factor in the decline in Pallid Sturgeon abundance as it provides refugia from high velocity—for all ages—and allows drifting larvae to settle and grow during highly vulnerable periods of their life36,37,56. In the present day, shallow, slow water habitat that is necessary is maximized during the following rare events: (1) extremely low flow periods in the main channel and (2) extreme high flow periods that result in out-of-bank flow events that enter the floodplain57. We hypothesize that a lack of consistent in-channel velocity refugia is a major contributor in driving growth characteristics, ultimately responsible for earlier onset of sexual maturation and overall reduction in size and longevity. The increased metabolic demand for maintaining station, foraging, and migration create situations where allostatic overload may occur, particularly when faced with other physiological stressors such as temperature extremes or high pollutant loads58.

Slight genetic differences may occur among river basins but were not solely responsible for the differences in life history traits seen in this study. Few generations of fish—particularly in the UB—have occurred since the wide-spread transformation of the Missouri River, which explains the breadth in plasticity of reaction norms. However, it is likely that selective forces may lead to genetic differences in life history traits in the future as many studies have revealed rapid evolution in reaction norms5,59,60,61. Plasticity in reaction norms has likely been adaptive in the LB as multiple generations (i.e., recruitment) have occurred since transformation of the lower Missouri River in the 1950s. Plasticity in reaction norms can be maladapative though, particularly when there is increasing selection and eventual genetic change for that plastic trait. Earlier onset of maturation is a reproductive strategy initiated by early-life growth patterns that allows organisms to produce progeny as quickly in life as possible15,62,63. In the case of Pallid Sturgeon from the LB, earlier onset of maturation allows female Pallid Sturgeon to produce as many possible spawning opportunities in a shortened lifespan—especially in relation to Pallid Sturgeon from the UB. While this strategy can be advantageous if environmental conditions are suitable for reproduction and recruitment, there are several factors that are concerning for species persistence. Long-lived, periodic strategists often spawn intermittently or produce inconsistent recruitment patterns. This strategy is effective because of longevity—where successive failed recruitment during years of unfavorable environmental conditions are mitigated from the successful recruitment of only one or two strong year classes during favorable conditions. However, when longevity is substantially reduced, the number of opportunities for providing a successful recruitment year decrease. Furthermore, large-scale impacts to already perturbed systems may take multiple years to return to pre-existing conditions or reach a new ecological equilibrium. If anthropogenic change intensifies (e.g., climate change), plasticity and genetic adaptation may be pushed to their limits.

Phenotypic plasticity in reaction norms has not been documented in long-lived periodic strategists. This is perhaps owing to the difficulty in separating genetic from environmental influences on phenotypic variation throughout a long life-span with few observed generations. Our common garden experiment allowed us to confirm phenotypic variation in Pallid Sturgeon, where plasticity occurred in response to environmental change, shifting the phenotype along a norm of reaction3,4,6. Although there was substantial variation in plasticity of age at maturity, longevity, and maximum size, it is unknown as to how plastic the reaction norm is among individuals or populations. Recent work by Steffensen et al.64 has shown a continual decline in maximum size of recent year classes of hatchery-produced Pallid Sturgeon from the LB, indicating a much wider range in plasticity than anticipated. Future work elucidating the complete reaction norm slope or shape and how they differ among Pallid Sturgeon genotypes may aid in the recovery process and better inform population models attempting to determine population viability and likely responses to alternative management actions.

## References

1. 1.

Ernande, B., Dieckmann, U. & Heino, M. Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 415–523 (2004).

2. 2.

Miner, B. G., Sultan, S. E., Morgan, S. G., Padilla, D. K. & Relyea, R. A. Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 685–692 (2005).

3. 3.

Schmalhausen, I. I. Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection (Blakiston, Lymington, 1949).

4. 4.

Oomen, R. A. & Hutchings, J. A. Genetic variability in reaction norms in fishes. Environ. Rev. 23, 353–366 (2015).

5. 5.

Gordon, S. P., Hendry, A. P. & Reznick, D. N. Predator-induced contemporary evolution, phenotypic plasticity, and the evolution of reaction norms in guppies. Copeia 105, 514–522 (2017).

6. 6.

Olsen, E. M. et al. Small-scale biocomplexity in coastal Atlantic cod supporting a Darwinian perspective on fisheries management. Evol. Appl. 1, 524–533 (2008).

7. 7.

Chevin, L. M., Lande, R. & Mace, G. M. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000357 (2010).

8. 8.

Reznick, D. N. Norms of reaction in fishes. In The Exploitation of Evolving Resources (eds Stokes, K. et al.) 72–90 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1993).

9. 9.

Trippel, E. A. Age at maturity as a stress indicator in fisheries. Bioscience 45, 759–771 (1995).

10. 10.

Mims, M. C. & Olden, J. D. Fish assemblages respond to altered flow regimes via ecological filtering of life history strategies. Freshw. Biol. 58, 50–62 (2013).

11. 11.

Bennett, M. G., Whiles, M. R. & Whitledge, G. W. Population-level responses of life history traits to flow regime in three common stream fish species. Ecohydrology 9, 1388–1399 (2016).

12. 12.

Congdon, J. D., Dunham, A. E., Hopkins, W. A., Rowe, C. L. & Hinton, T. G. Resource allocation-based life histories: A conceptual basis for studies of ecological toxicology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 1698–1703 (2001).

13. 13.

Walsh, M. R. & Reznick, D. N. Interactions between the direct and indirect effects of predators determine life history evolution in a killifish. PNAS 105, 594–599 (2008).

14. 14.

Sokolova, I. M. Energy-Limited tolerance to stress as a conceptual framework to integrate the effects of multiple stressors. Integr Comp Biol 53, 597–608 (2013).

15. 15.

Roff, D. A. The Evolution of Life History Parameters in Teleosts. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 989–1000 (1984).

16. 16.

Ward, H. G. M., Post, J. R., Lester, N. P., Askey, J. P. & Godin, T. Empirical evidence of plasticity in life-history characteristics across climatic and fish density gradients. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 74, 464–474 (2016).

17. 17.

Thorson, J. T., Munch, S. B., Cope, J. M. & Gao, J. Predicting life history parameters for all fishes worldwide. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2262–2276 (2017).

18. 18.

Alberto, F. et al. Adaptive responses for seed and leaf phenology in natural populations of sessile oak along an altitudinal gradient. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1442–1454 (2011).

19. 19.

Toräng, P. et al. Large-scale adaptive differentiation in the alpine perennial herb Arabis alpina. New Phytol. 206, 459–470 (2015).

20. 20.

Sparks, M. M., Westley, P. A. H., Falke, J. A. & Quinn, T. P. Thermal adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in a warming world: Insights from common garden experiments on Alaskan sockeye salmon. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5203–5217 (2017).

21. 21.

Wright, P. J. Methodological challenges to examining the causes of variation in stock reproductive potential. Fish. Res. 138, 14–22 (2013).

22. 22.

Conover, D. O. & Baumann, H. PERSPECTIVE: The role of experiments in understanding fishery-induced evolution. Evol. Appl. 2, 276–290 (2009).

23. 23.

Nagrodski, A., Murchie, K. J., Stamplecoskie, K. M., Suski, C. D. & Cooke, S. J. Effects of an experimental short-term cortisol challenge on the behaviour of wild creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus in mesocosm and stream environments. J. Fish Biol. 82, 1138–1158 (2013).

24. 24.

Winemiller, K. O. Life history strategies, population regulation, and implications for fisheries management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 872–885 (2005).

25. 25.

Weeks, S. C. Phenotypic plasticity of life-history traits in clonal and sexual fish (Poeciliopsis) at high and low densities. Oecologia 93, 307–314 (1993).

26. 26.

Ziegler, P. E., Lyle, J. M., Haddon, M. & Ewing, G. P. Rapid changes in life-history characteristics of a long-lived temperate reef fish. Mar. Freshwater Res. 58, 1096–1107 (2008).

27. 27.

Genner, M. J. et al. Body size-dependent responses of a marine fish assemblage to climate change and fishing over a century-long scale. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 517–527 (2010).

28. 28.

Wanner, G. A., Shuman, D. A. & Willis, D. W. Food habits of juvenile Pallid Sturgeon and adult Shovelnose Sturgeon in the Missouri River downstream of Fort Randall Dam, South Dakota. J. Freshw. Ecol. 22, 81–92 (2007).

29. 29.

Grohs, K. L., Klumb, R. A., Chipps, S. R. & Wanner, G. A. Ontogenetic patterns in prey use by Pallid Sturgeon in the Missouri River, South Dakota and Nebraska. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25, 48–53 (2009).

30. 30.

Gerrity, P. C., Guy, C. S. & Gardner, W. M. Juvenile Pallid Sturgeon are piscivorous: a call for conserving native cyprinids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 604–609 (2006).

31. 31.

Keenlyne, K. D., Grossman, E. M. & Jenkins, L. G. Fecundity of the Pallid Sturgeon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121, 139–140 (1992).

32. 32.

Koch, J. D., Steffensen, K. D. & Pegg, M. A. Validation of age estimates obtained from juvenile Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus pectoral fin spines. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 27, 209–212 (2011).

33. 33.

Hamel, M. J. et al. Using mark–recapture information to validate and assess age and growth of long-lived fish species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71, 559–566 (2014).

34. 34.

Braaten, P. J. et al. Age estimations of wild Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus, Forbes & Richardson 1905) based on pectoral fin spines, otoliths and bomb radiocarbon: inferences on recruitment in the dam-fragmented Missouri River. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 31, 821–829 (2015).

35. 35.

Keenlyne, K. D. & Jenkins, L. G. Age at sexual maturity of the Pallid Sturgeon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122, 393–396 (1993).

36. 36.

Dryer, M. P. & Sandvol, A. J. Pallid Sturgeon recovery plan (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Bismarck, North Dakota, 1990).

37. 37.

Bramblett, R. G. & White, R. G. Habitat use and movements of Pallid and Shovelnose Sturgeon in the Yellowstone and Missouri Rivers in Montana and North Dakota. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130, 1006–1025 (2001).

38. 38.

Jordan, G. R. et al. Status of knowledge of the Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus Forbes and Richardson, 1905). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 32, 191–207 (2016).

39. 39.

Hesse, L. W. Taming the wild Missouri River: what has it cost?. Fisheries 12, 2–9 (1987).

40. 40.

Latka, D. C., Nestler, J. & Hesse, L. W. Restoring physical habitat in the Missouri River: a historical perspective. In Restoration Planning for the River of the Missouri River Ecosystem (eds Hesse, L. W. et al.) 350–359 (Biological Report 19, National Biological Survey, Washington, D.C., 1993).

41. 41.

Yager, L. A., Dixon, M. D., Cowman, T. C. & Soluk, D. A. Historic changes (1941–2008) in side channel and backwater habitats on an unchannelized reach of the Missouri River. River Res. Appl. 29, 493–501 (2013).

42. 42.

Galat, D. L. & Lipkin, R. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. In Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology (eds Jungwirth, M. et al.) 29–48 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2000).

43. 43.

Welker, T. L. & Drobish, M. R. Pallid Sturgeon population assessment project. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Volume 1.6 Yankton (SD) (2016).

44. 44.

Wildhaber, M. L., Albers, J. L., Green, N. S. & Moran, E. H. A fully-stochasticized, age-structured population model for population viability analysis of fish: Lower Missouri River endangered Pallid Sturgeon example. Ecol. Model. 359, 434–448 (2017).

45. 45.

Schrey, A. W. & Heist, E. J. Stock structure of Pallid Sturgeon analyzed with microsatellite loci. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 23, 297–303 (2007).

46. 46.

Eichelberger, J. S., Braaten, P. J., Fuller, D. B., Krampe, M. S. & Heist, E. J. Novel single-nucleotide polymorphism markers confirm successful spawning of endangered Pallid Sturgeon in the upper Missouri River basin. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 143, 1373–1385 (2014).

47. 47.

Hamel, M. J. et al. Range-wide age and growth characteristics of shovelnose sturgeon from mark–recapture data: implications for conservation and management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72, 71–82 (2014).

48. 48.

Fabens, A. J. Properties and fitting of the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Growth 29, 265–289 (1965).

49. 49.

Isely, J. J. & Grabowski, T. B. Age and growth. In Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data (eds Guy, C. S. & Brown, M. L.) 187–228 (American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 2007).

50. 50.

Pauly, D. Gill size and temperature as governing factors in fish growth: a generalization of von Bertalanffy’s growth formula. Ber. Inst. F. Meereskunde Univ. Kiel., No. 63 (1979)

51. 51.

Kirkwood, G. P. Estimation of von Bertalanffy growth curve parameters using both length increment and age–length data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40, 1405–1411 (1983).

52. 52.

Hewitt, D. A. & Hoenig, J. M. Comparison of two approaches for estimating natural mortality based on longevity. Fish. Bull. 6, 433 (2005).

53. 53.

Seber, G. A. F. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters 2nd edn. (MacMillian, New York, 1982).

54. 54.

Steffensen, K. D., Pegg, M. A. & Mestl, G. E. Population characteristics of Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus (Forbes & Richardson)) in the Lower Missouri River. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 29, 687–695 (2013).

55. 55.

Holmquist, L. M., Guy, C. S., Tews, A. & Webb, M. A. H. First maturity and spawning periodicity of hatchery-origin Pallid Sturgeon in the upper Missouri River above Fort Peck Reservoir, Montanna. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 35, 138–148 (2019).

56. 56.

Pegg, M. A., Pierce, C. L. & Roy, A. Hydrological alteration along the Missouri River Basin: a time series approach. Aquat. Sci. 65, 63–72 (2003).

57. 57.

Jacobson, R. B. & Galat, D. L. Flow and form in rehabilitation of large-river ecosystems: an example from the Lower Missouri River. Geomorphology 77, 249–269 (2006).

58. 58.

McEwen, B. S. & Wingfield, J. C. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm. Behav. 43, 2–15 (2003).

59. 59.

Olsen, E. M. et al. Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 428, 932–935 (2004).

60. 60.

Kopp, M. & Matuszewski, S. Rapid evolution of quantitative traits: theoretical perspectives. Evol. Appl. 7, 169–191 (2014).

61. 61.

Phillis, C. C. et al. Shifting thresholds: rapid evolution of migratory life histories in Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Hered. 107, 51–60 (2016).

62. 62.

Bell, G. The costs of reproduction and their consequences. Am. Nat. 116, 45–76 (1980).

63. 63.

Wright, P. J. & Trippel, E. A. Fishery-induced demographic changes in the timing of spawning: consequences for reproductive success*. Fish Fish. 10, 283–304 (2009).

64. 64.

Steffensen, K. D., Hamel, M. J. & Spurgeon, J. J. Post-stocking Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus growth, dispersal, and survival in the lower Missouri River. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 35, 117–127 (2019).

## Acknowledgements

We thank the Pallid Sturgeon population assessment crew from the Missouri Department of Conservation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service—Columbia, MO, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, United States Fish and Wildlife Service—Pierre, SD, and the Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks for their contribution of data. We thank J. Powell with Gavins Point National Fish Hatchery, C. Landstad with Blind Pony Fish Hatchery, and R. Holm with the Garrison Dam National Fish Hatchery. Funding was provided through Federal Sportfish Restoration F-180-R and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln School of Natural Resources. Additional resources for field collections were provided by US Army Corps of Engineers and the Pallid Sturgeon Population Assessment Project.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

The concept of the paper was developed by M.J.H. Data analyses were performed by M.J.H. and J.J. Spurgeon. The manuscript was written by M.J.H., J.J.S. and M.A.P. Data collection and synthesis was performed by K.D.S.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin J. Hamel.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Hamel, M.J., Spurgeon, J.J., Steffensen, K.D. et al. Uncovering unique plasticity in life history of an endangered centenarian fish. Sci Rep 10, 12866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69911-1

• Accepted:

• Published: