Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Morphological stasis in the first myxomycete from the Mesozoic, and the likely role of cryptobiosis



Myxomycetes constitute a group within the Amoebozoa well known for their motile plasmodia and morphologically complex fruiting bodies. One obstacle hindering studies of myxomycete evolution is that their fossils are exceedingly rare, so evolutionary analyses of this supposedly ancient lineage of amoebozoans are restricted to extant taxa. Molecular data have significantly advanced myxomycete systematics, but the evolutionary history of individual lineages and their ecological adaptations remain unknown. Here, we report exquisitely preserved myxomycete sporocarps in amber from Myanmar, ca. 100 million years old, one of the few fossil myxomycetes, and the only definitive Mesozoic one. Six densely-arranged stalked sporocarps were engulfed in tree resin while young, with almost the entire spore mass still inside the sporotheca. All morphological features are indistinguishable from those of the modern, cosmopolitan genus Stemonitis, demonstrating that sporocarp morphology has been static since at least the mid-Cretaceous. The ability of myxomycetes to develop into dormant stages, which can last years, may account for the phenotypic stasis between living Stemonitis species and this fossil one, similar to the situation found in other organisms that have cryptobiosis. We also interpret Stemonitis morphological stasis as evidence of strong environmental selection favouring the maintenance of adaptations that promote wind dispersal.


Myxomycetes or ‘slime molds’ are a monophyletic lineage of eukaryotes that produce intriguing, morphologically complex fruiting bodies. They are phylogenetically an ancient lineage within the Amoebozoa1,2,3, but like most amoeboid microorganisms, direct evidence of their evolutionary history is extremely scarce4.

The traditional classification of myxomycetes has been based entirely on morphological characteristics of the fruiting bodies and spores, so molecular methods have recently provided many new insights into phylogenetic relationshipse.g. refs. 5,6,7,8,9,10. In fact, the hierarchical classification of myxomycetes has been revised based on DNA data5.

Phylogenetic studies have confirmed that together with dictyostelioids (Dictyosteliomycetes) and three genera of fruiting amoebae (Ceratiomycetes) the myxomycetes (Myxomycetes) represent a monophyletic group within the subgroup Evosea of Amoebozoa11,12,13. These phylogenies have not supported the traditional five-order classification of the myxomycetes that was followed in most previous treatments e.g. refs. 14,15,16,17. Rather, two main lineages appear to occur phylogenetically within the myxomycetes. One contains the traditional orders Stemonitales and Physarales, which have a columella (extension of the stalk inside the sporotheca) and spores that are darkened due to melanin in the spore walls (Fuscisporidia). The traditional order Echinosteliales tends to have hyaline spores but constitutes a basal group within the dark-spored lineage. The second main clade includes myxomycetes of the traditional orders Licelaes and Trichiales, which have light-colored spores having little or no melanin in the spore walls7,10. The peridium, a usually persistent covering that surrounds the spore-containing sporothecae of fruiting bodies, is an apomorphic character for the class Myxomycetes. However, the peridium is evanescent in the genus Echinostelium, in most members of the order Stemonitidales (the group to which the amber fossil belongs), and in many Trichiales. The central synapomorphy of the newly circumscribed order Stemonitidales is the fugacious peridium, i.e., the mature sporothecae of these myxomycetes lack peridia5.

Here we present fossil evidence of one of the two main lineages of the myxomycetes, in amber approximately 100 million years old from northern Myanmar. The fossil sporocarps are indistinguishable from the extant genus Stemonitis and provide unique insight into the longevity of ecological adaptations in myxomycetes. The fossil can be used as a minimum age constraint for this genus after more comprehensive and robust analyses of phylogenetic relationships among the Stemonitidales and related lineages become available.

Results and Discussion

Description of the fossil

Entire specimen consists of a densely-arranged group of six stalked sporocarps entrapped in resin while young, with almost entire spore mass still inside sporotheca (Fig. 1). Sporocarps initially in contact, two marginal ones displaced during preservation and leaning outwards. Stalks reddish brown to black, opaque, up to 400 µm in length, without fibrous base; some stalks ruptured indicating a hollow centre. Numerous quartz (sand) grains attached to common base of sporocarps, suggesting that particles attached to thin, sticky hypothallus deposited by plasmodium earlier during fruiting. Sporotheca cylindrical and rounded at both ends, ca. 2 mm long and 150–220 µm wide, blackish brown and becoming translucent after shedding spores; peridium not preserved. Stalk continuing as columella into sporotheca, probably extending past middle, but hidden by dense spore mass and not seen through ruptured apices of two sporocarps. Connection between columella and capillitium only visible at basal ends of spore cases, but capillitium probably connected to columella along its entire length. Capillitium forming dichotomous branches without markedly expanded nodes, giving rise to large meshes before reaching surface. Capillitium threads becoming more slender and paler towards surface where they anastomose to form peripheral surface net with few free ends, consisting of patchwork of small irregular meshes 5 µm across and larger meshes of 20–25 µm across. Spores dark brown en masse, pale brown or translucent in transmitted light, 5–7 µm in diameter, with clearly reticulate surface ornamentation.

Figure 1

Fossil Stemonitis in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar. (a) General habitus of sporocarps. (b) Surface of sporotheca, showing details of capillitium. (c) Base of sporotheca, showing stalk continuing as a columella into the sporotheca. (d) Detached spores. Scale bars 200 µm in (a). 20 µm in (b), 10 µm in (c), and 5 µm in (d).


All morphological characteristics substantiate that the fossil is not just a myxomycete (class Myxomycetes, phylum Eumycetozoa) but indicate placement in the extant genus Stemonitis Gled. This is the type genus of the family Stemonitidaceae, order Stemonitidales, superorder Stemonitidia, and subclass Columellomycetidae5. The class Myxomycetes is comprised of sporocarpic Eumycetozoa with fruiting bodies containing numerous spores and usually a persistent peridium around the sporotheca (taxa with evanescent peridia lack the covering in mature fruiting bodies)18. The subclass Columellomycetidae comprises the dark-spored myxomycetes with a capillitium connected to a true columella. The superorder Stemonitidia have spores appearing usually dark en masse, with order Stemonitales having an epihypothallically developed stalk that usually extends into a true columella, and an evanescent peridium. The family Stemonitidaceae is characterized by a branching and anastomosing capillitium arising from the columella and with capillitial threads usually forming a surface net. Finally, the genus Stemonitis unites the myxomycetes that produce cylindrical sporothecae and have a richly branched and anastomosed capillitium that forms a pronounced surface net.

Identification of extant myxomycete species is based almost entirely on morphological characteristics of sporocarps and spores16,17. The genus Stemonitis currently includes ca. 20 accepted species19. Many of them are common worldwide, but also morphologically plastic. Due to considerable morphological variation within extant Stemonitis species, a confident infrageneric assignment of the fossil is impossible. However, the relatively small sporocarps with short stalks (ca. 1/5 of sporocarp height) and the relatively small, pale, reticulate spores closely resemble those of the cosmopolitan Stemonitis virginiensis Rex16.

Paleoecological setting

Remains of diverse conifers and angiosperms, such as leafy shoots, leaves and flowers, occur as inclusions in Burmese amber20. Araucariaceae and Cupressaceae (Metasequoia) have been suggested as botanical sources of the fossil resin, respectively21,22. Moreover, Burmese amber currently represents the most important source of Cretaceous non-spermatophyte plants. The number of fern taxa in Burmese amber exceeds that of any other amber deposit worldwide23 and mosses and liverworts are very diverse in this amber24,25, which suggests high humidity and precipitation in the Burmese amber paleoenvironment and agrees with the presence of angiosperm leaves with drip-tips, velvet worms (phylum Onychophora) and other distinctly wet tropical organisms in this amber20.

Amber piece JZC Bu266 containing the Stemonitis fossil also contains a left posterior (hind) leg of an agamid lizard that retained scale pigmentation, as previously reported (Fig. 2h and 4 h in Daza et al.26). The leg of the agamid lizard is preserved as an 18 mm-long distal portion with toes and claws, a length almost equal that of the amber piece (Fig. 2). Two toe tips and claws of a second leg are preserved at the edge of the piece, suggesting that the entire lizard was trapped by a resin flow, if not entirely preserved. The shortest distance between the Stemonitis sporocarps and one claw of a toe is only 2.2 mm. There are no insects or other obvious syninclusions except for several branched plant trichomes, which are abundant in Burmese amber, as well as tiny fragments of wood or bark remains, hardened resin, and some quartz (sand) grains.

Figure 2

Overview of Burmese amber specimen JZC Bu266 (amber collection of the Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History) showing the close proximity of the myxomycete sporocarps (arrowhead) and the hind leg of an agamid lizard. Scale bar 1 mm.

Given the small, isolated clump of sand grain substrate and sporocarps, the fossilized Stemonitis obviously was not trapped in situ but either transported by flowing resin, or perhaps it fell into stationary exudate after being dislodged from the original substrate. Plasmodia of extant Stemonitis species are often seen on the bases of tree trunks and on partly decorticated logs, where they also produce their fragile fruiting bodies (Fig. 3). The detachment of a small group of young, dry sporocarps from a common hypothallus must have required some force, and the ruptured apices of two sporocarps indicate mechanical damage. It is feasible that an abrupt detachment may have happened under the foot of a climbing lizard, thrashing from its entrapment in viscous resin.

Figure 3

Extant Stemonitis species (Stemonitis axifera) producing sporocarps on bark and lignicolous bryophytes (Saarijärvi, Finland). (a) Young sporocarps. (b) Mature sporocarps. Scale bars 2 mm.

Evolutionary implications

The fascinating life cycle of myxomycetes involves two main stages, one consisting of uninucleate amoebae (with or without flagella), and the second a multinucleate plasmodium, which under favorable conditions develops into spore-containing fruiting bodies27. The motile amoebae feed on bacteria and divide until they give rise to the plasmodium. The plasmodium, which also moves, feeds by engulfing surface bacteria, fungal spores, yeasts and algae. The amoebae can avoid adverse conditions by transforming into dormant microcysts, and the plasmodium can convert into a hard, dormant sclerotium. Microcysts and sclerotia can withstand drought and cold, and spores may remain viable for years or even decades28,29.

Myxomycetes are ubiquitous in most vegetated, terrestrial ecosystems27,30. Their diversity tends to be higher in communities with higher diversity and biomass of the vascular plants, which support the microorganismal substrates upon which the amoebae and plasmodia feed. They are most diverse in tropical and temperate forests, and least in boreal forests, arctic or alpine ecosystems. In tropical forests, myxomycete diversity appears to be greater in arboreal microhabitats; in more temperate forests, greater diversity occurs on or close to the forest floor. Moreover, in tropical forests, myxomycetes seem to produce fruiting bodies more readily in relatively dry habitats27,30,31.

As myxomycetes spend much of their lives as microscopic spores, unicellular amoebae, or resting cells, and their macroscopic plasmodia and fruiting bodies are small, ephemeral and soft, myxomycetes are improbable candidates for fossilization. Unsurprisingly, fossil myxomycetes are exceedingly rare. Domke32 reported several sporocarps of Stemonitis and Dörfelt et al.33 a single sporocarp of Arcyria (Trichiales) from Eocene Baltic amber. A further specimen from Baltic amber assigned to Protophysarum (Physarales)34 likely represents a calicioid fungus of the Mycocaliciales (Ascomycota). A putative plasmodium of a myxomycete reported from Miocene Dominican amber35 seems to be a pseudoinclusion, resulting from plant exudate that was immiscible with the terpenoid resin matrix (see Fig. 1I in Thiel et al.36). The recent report of a structure in Burmese amber, interpreted as a dictyostelioid slime mold37 is likewise unconvincing. In addition, fossil spores resembling those of some extant myxomycetes have been found from Oligocene and Pleistocene deposits38. Some dark, reticulated spores from the Maastrichtian Deccan Intertrappean beds in India were recently suggested to be slime mold spores39, but the fossils are much larger than the spores of extant myxomycetes. Other questionable microfossils identified as solitary and conjugating swarm cells of myxomycetes were previously reported from the same deposit40. Thus, the fossil Stemonitis reported here is one of the few definitive fossil myxomycetes, and the only unquestionable Mesozoic one. In the future, the fossil will provide a solid minimum age constraint for Stemonitis. As of yet, molecular divergence-time estimates are premature because a single fossil is insufficient for calibrating the whole of myxomycetes, as various clades may have evolved at different rates41. Furthermore, current molecular phylogenies for myxomycetes are based on only 2–3 genes, and support values for many nodes are low5.

The spores of nearly all extant myxomycete species range from 5 to 15 µm in diameter, with most species between 8 and 12 µm. The spores are mainly dispersed by wind, but water and animal dispersal are known for some species5,27,30,31. All morphological characters of myxomycete fruiting bodies that affect the dispersal abilities of spores, including the overall structure of the fruiting body, the presence and/or length of stalk, and the degree of capillitium development, must be under strong environmental selection5,42. The capillitium is of obvious adaptive significance as it effectively prevents the spore mass against detaching from the stalk and allows spores to disperse separately as they dry out5. An interesting adaptive trend in myxomycetes is from solitary to compound fruiting bodies and from stalked forms to sessile forms, typically with corresponding change of spore dissemination mode from wind dispersal, often facilitated by a well-developed capillitium, to dispersal via rainwater and/or insects43,44.

The stalks of myxomycete sporocarps elevate spores above the substrate, allowing them to dry out and become airborne. Thus, for species inhabiting substrates that dry out rapidly, the resources required for producing a stalk can be put to other uses31. Long stalks are especially beneficial on permanently moist substrates, and some myxomycete species that grow in the humid tropics produce particularly long stalks27. During evolution there must have been a substantial selective pressure for maintaining stalked sporocarps, as building a stalk is always likely to take resources from spore production31. Terminal velocity, the main indicator for dispersal efficiency, depends critically on spore size, and hydrophobic ornaments of the spore surface influence the adhesion properties of the spore45,46. As spore size in myxomycetes is critical and preserved, also other features of the fructification must have been well preserved, including the stalk and columella, and the surface net in Stemonitis.

The ability of myxomycetes to withstand adverse conditions through extended dormancy can reduce the amount of phenotypic or adaptive change and may also be a significant factor in explaining the observed stasis in sporocarp morphology. A similar phenomenon has been previously proposed for a fossil tardigrade preserved in New Jersey Cretaceous amber47. Many species in the phylum Tardigrada are legendary in their cryptobiotic abilities, being able to survive desiccation for decades, as well as anoxia, extreme temperatures, and gamma radiation48,49. Among the most experimentally studied of these tardigrades is the global species Milnesium tardigradum, which is very similar to a species in 90 million-year-old amber from New Jersey, USA47.

Also several other groups of organisms that have durable dormant stages show remarkable morphological stasis. Cryptobiosis is a life stage in which metabolism is virtually to completely arrested, in response to desiccation, heat, cold and other environmental stresses50. Perhaps the best known example of this involves tadpole shrimp of the genus Triops (Crustacea: Notostraca), which inhabit vernal pools. As the pools evaporate Triops eggs enter into anhydrobiosis (a form of cryptobiosis), which can endure water of sub-boiling temperatures for short periods and complete desiccation for decades50,51,52. Fossils from the Triassic of Germany and France, 205–238 Ma, are very similar to the widespread species T. cancriformis53,54, although Trusheim54 classified the German Triassic fossils as the subspecies T. cancriformis minor. Wagner et al.55 regarded the German Triassic fossils (237–227 Ma) as a separate species, Triops minor, because of slight differences in body proportions among developmental stadia. The cladistic analysis of living and fossil notostracans by Lagebro et al.56 hypothesized T. minor as distantly related to living Triops, but in that analysis the monophyly of Triops was poorly supported (appearing in just 57% of trees), and relationships among species and genera poorly resolved. That Triops is phenotypically highly conserved, as is Notostraca in general, is further supported by two other findings: 1. The Devonian Strudops goldenbergi, fully recognizable as a crown-group notostracan with a large carapace, 12 pairs of thoracic appendages; and a slender, multisegmented telson with terminal pair of long caudal filaments56. 2. Morphologically defined species of the closely related genus Lepidurus comprise complexes of cryptic species based on genetic sequences57. With little question, Triops and Triops-like notostracans have existed for at least 230 million years.

Interestingly, cryptobiosis in all of these organisms, including slime molds, appears to result from an ability in the dormant stage to replace cellular water with trehalose50,58. Cryptobiosis has probably substantially slowed phenotypic change in tardigrades, notostracans, and slime molds by greatly reducing the number of generations over geological time, but more importantly by being a very effective general adaptation for freeing the organism from environmental stress and the need to develop specialized adaptations59.

Finding a Stemonitis fossil from the mid-Cretaceous is highly relevant for the ongoing discussion on the ecology and morphological adaptations of myxomycetes, and of slow phenotypic change in organisms with life stages that are cryptobiotic. The presumed paleohabitat of the fossil (a tree trunk in a humid tropical forest), is consistent with the habitat preferences of several extant Stemonitis species. All morphological features of the fossil closely mirror those of modern species of the genus, demonstrating that all key features of the sporocarp have remained unchanged for at least 100 million years. This provides overwhelming evidence of strong environmental selection favouring the conserved maintenance of morphological adaptations that specifically promote wind dispersal in this group of myxomycetes (Stemonitales).


Stemonitis in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber is by far the oldest record of myxomycetes known to date. The morphological characteristics of the fossil are essentially identical to those seen in extant species of the genus, revealing that all key features of the sporocarps have resisted change for at least the past 100 million years. We infer this a result of cryptobiosis, and as evidence of strong environmental selection favoring the maintenance of adaptations that promote wind dispersal in this lineage of myxomycetes.

Materials and Methods

With approximately 1200 fossil species thus far (half of them described in the past three years)60, Burmese amber from Myanmar represents the most important current source of three-dimensionally preserved Mesozoic terrestrial organisms, including fungi, plants, and animals20. Delicate cellular structures are often preserved in exceptional fidelity.

The fossil myxomycete is enclosed in a 21 × 15 × 4 mm sized piece of mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (‘Kachin amber’) which derives from the outcrop near the village of Tanai located on the Ledo Road about 105 km north of Myitkyina in Kachin State, Myanmar. Several lines of evidence point to a mid-Cretaceous age of this so-called Burmese amber20,22, and biostratigraphic studies suggest a late Albian age of the amber-bearing sediment61, hence the inclusions have an age of approximately 100 million years, with a minimum age of 98 million years (earliest Cenomanian) that is based on recent U-Pb dating of zircons62. This age estimate has recently been confirmed by the discovery of an ammonite shell of the genus Puzosia, a late Albian–late Cenomanian index fossil, enclosed in a piece of Burmese amber63.

Based on the collection date of the amber piece, we exclude that the specimen JZC Bu266 derived from the recently described younger Tilin amber from Myanmar, which is Campanian in age and also has a distinct molecular profile64. JZC Bu266 was collected prior to 2013 and first reported in 201626 whereas Tilin amber was first reported in 201864.

Amber specimen JZC Bu266 is part of the amber collection of the Division of Invertebrate Zoology American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. The prepared amber specimen was mounted on a glass microscopic slide with the upper polished surface oriented horizontally. A drop of water was applied to the upper surface of the amber and covered with a 0.06–0.08 mm thickness glass coverslip (Menzel Inc., Braunschweig) to reduce light scattering from fine surface scratches and to improve optical resolution65.

The amber inclusion was examined under a Carl Zeiss AxioScope A1 compound microscope using incident and transmitted light simultaneously. Images were taken with Canon EOS 5D digital camera attached to the microscope. For enhanced illustration of three-dimensional structures, all figures are photomicrographic composites which were digitally stacked from up to 70 individual focal planes, using the software package HeliconFocus Version 6.3.3 Pro66.

Data availability

The fossil specimen is part of the public collection of the American Museum of Natural History in New York, USA.


  1. 1.

    Adl, S. M. et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 59, 429–493 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Adl, S. M. et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 66, 4–119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ruggiero, M. A. et al. A higher level classification of all living organisms. Plos One 10, e0119248 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Taylor, T. N., Krings, M. & Taylor, E. Fossil Fungi (Academic Press, 2015).

  5. 5.

    Leontyev, D. V., Schnittler, M., Stephenson, S. L. & Novozhilov, Y. K. Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Myxomycetes. Phytotaxa 399, 209–238 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fiore-Donno, A. M., Berney, C. J., Pawlowski, J. & Baldauf, S. L. Higher-order phylogeny of plasmodial slime molds (Myxogastria) based on elongation factor 1A and small subunit rRNA gene sequences. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 52, 201–210 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fiore-Donno, A. M., Meyer, M., Baldauf, S. L. & Pawlowski, J. Evolution of dark-spored Myxomycetes (slime molds): molecules versus morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 46, 878–889 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fiore-Donno, A. M. et al. Deep phylogeny and evolution of slime moulds (Mycetozoa). Protist 161, 55–70 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fiore-Donno, A. M. et al. 18S rDNA phylogeny of Lamproderma and allied genera (Stemonitales, Myxomycetes, Amoebozoa). PLoS ONE 7, e35359 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fiore-Donno, A. M., Clissmann, F., Meyer, M., Schnittler, M. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Two-gene phylogeny of bright-spored Myxomycetes (slime moulds, superorder Lucisporidia). PLoS ONE 8, e62586 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shadwick, L. L., Spiegel, F. W., Shadwick, J. D., Brown, M. W. & Silberman, J. D. Eumycetozoa = Amoebozoa? SSU rDNA phylogeny of protosteloid slime molds and its significance for the amoebozoan supergroup. PLoS ONE 4, e6754 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tice, A. K. et al. Expansion of the molecular and morphological diversity of Acanthamoebidae (Centramoebida, Amoebozoa) and identification of a novel life cycle type within the group. Biol. Direct 11, 69–90 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kang, S. et al. Between a pod and a hard test: The deep evolution of amoebae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2258–2270 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Martin, G. W., Alexopoulos, C. J. & Farr, M. L. The genera of Myxomycetes (University of Iowa Press, 1969).

  15. 15.

    Farr, M. L. Myxomycetes. Flora Neotropica 16, 1–305 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nannenga-Bremekamp, N. E. A guide to temperate Myxomycetes (Biopress, 1991).

  17. 17.

    Stephenson, S. L. & Stempen, H. Myxomycetes. A handbook of slime molds. (Timber Press, 1994).

  18. 18.

    Turland, N. J. et al. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159 (Koeltz Botanical Books, 2018).

  19. 19.

    Lado, C. An online nomenclatural information system of Eumycetozoa. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Madrid, Spain, (2005–2019).

  20. 20.

    Grimaldi, D. A. & Ross, A. J. Extraordinary Lagerstätten in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma in Terrestrial Conservation Lagerstätten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land (eds Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D.) 287–342 (Dunedin Academic Press, 2017).

  21. 21.

    Poinar, G. O., Lambert, J. B. & Wu, J. Araucarian source of fossiliferous Burmese amber: Spectroscopic and anatomical evidence. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1, 449–455 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S. & Nascimbene, P. Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. Am. Mus. Novit. 3361, 1–72 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Regalado, L. et al. Heinrichsia cheilanthoides gen. et sp. nov., a fossil fern in the family Pteridaceae (Polypodiales) from the Cretaceous amber forests of Myanmar. J. Syst. Evol. 57, 329–338 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hedenäs, L., Heinrichs, J. & Schmidt, A. R. Bryophytes of the Burmese amber forest: amending and expanding the circumscription of the Cretaceous moss genus Vetiplanaxis (Bryophyta, Hypnodendrales). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 209, 1–10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heinrichs, J. et al. A comprehensive assessment of the fossil record of liverworts in amber in Transformative Paleobotany. Papers to commemorate the life and legacy of Thomas N. Taylor (eds Krings, M., Harper, C. J, Cúneo, N. R. & Rothwell, G. W.) 213–252 (Academic Press, 2018).

  26. 26.

    Daza, J. D., Stanley, E. L., Wagner, P., Bauer, A. M. & Grimaldi, D. A. Mid-Cretaceous amber fossils illuminate the past diversity of tropical lizards. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501080 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Stephenson, S. L., Schnittler, M. & Novozhilov, Y. K. Myxomycete diversity and distribution from the fossil record to the present. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 285–301 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Keller, H. W., Everhart, S. F. & Kilgore, C. M. The Myxomycetes; Introduction, basic biology, life cycles, genetics and reproduction in Myxomycetes: Biology, Systematics, Biogeography and Ecology (eds Stephenson, S. & Rojas, C.) 1–40 (Academic Press, 2017).

  29. 29.

    Härkönen, M. & Ukkola, T. Conclusions on myxomycetes compiled over twenty-five years from 4793 moist chamber cultures. Stapfia 73, 105–112 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Novozhilow, Y. K., Rollins, A. W. & Schnittler, M. Ecology and distribution of Myxomycetes in Myxomycetes: Biology, Systematics, Biogeography and Ecology (eds Stephenson, S. & Rojas, C.) 253–298 (Academic Press, 2017).

  31. 31.

    Schnittler, M., Dagamac, N. H. A. & Novozhilhov, Y. K. Biogeographical Patterns in Myxomycetes in Myxomycetes: Biology, Systematics, Biogeography and Ecology (eds Stephenson, S. & Rojas, C.) 299–331 (Academic Press, 2017).

  32. 32.

    Domke, W. Der erste sichere Fund eines Myxomyceten im Baltischen Bernstein (Stemonitis splendens Rost. fa. succini fa. nov. foss.). Mitt. Geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg 21, 154–161 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dörfelt, H., Schmidt, A. R., Ullmann, P. & Wunderlich, J. The oldest fossil myxogastroid slime mould. Mycol. Res. 107, 123–126 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dörfelt, H. & Schmidt, A. R. An archaic slime mould in Baltic amber. Palaeontology 49, 1013–1017 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Waggoner, B. M. & Poinar, G. O. A fossil myxomycete plasmodium from Eocene-Oligocene amber of the Dominican Republic. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 39, 639–642 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Thiel, V. et al. Microbe-like inclusions in tree resins and implications for the fossil record of protists in amber. Geobiology 14, 364–373 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Poinar, G. & Vega, F. E. Mid-Cretaceous cellular slime mold (Eukarya: Dictyostelia?) in Burmese amber. Hist. Biol., (2019).

  38. 38.

    Graham, A. The role of Myxomyceta spores in palynology (with a brief note on the morphology of certain algal zygospores). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 11, 89–99 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kar, R. & Sing, R. S. Earliest record of slime moulds (Myxomycetes) from the Deccan Intertrappean beds (Maastrichtian), Padwar, India. Curr. Sci. 107, 1237–1239 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kar, R. K., Sharma, N. & Kar, R. Swarm cells of slime molds in sexual conjugation from sixty-five million year old sediments, Madhya Pradesh, India. Curr. Sci. 89, 1086–1088 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Warnock, R. C. M., Yang, Z. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Testing the molecular clock using mechanistic models of fossil preservation and molecular evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170227 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Leontyev, D. V. & Schnittler, M. The phylogeny of Myxomycetes in Myxomycetes: Biology, Systematics, Biogeography and Ecology (eds Stephenson, S. & Rojas, C.) 83–106 (Academic Press, 2017).

  43. 43.

    Leontyev, D. V. et al. The genus Alwisia (Myxomycetes) revalidated, with two species new to science. Mycologia 106, 936–948 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Leontyev, D. V. The evolution of the sporophore in Reticulariaceae (Myxogastrea). Ukr. Bot. J. 72, 178–184 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tesmer, J. & Schnittler, M. Sedimentation velocity of myxomycete spores. Mycol. Prog. 6, 229–234 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schnittler, M. & Tesmer, J. A habitat colonisation model for spore-dispersed organisms – does it work with eumycetozoans? Mycol. Res. 112, 697–707 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bertolani, R. & Grimaldi, D. A new Eutardigrade (Tardigrada: Milnesiidae) in amber from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) of New Jersey in Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey (ed. Grimaldi, D.) 103–110 (Backhuys Publishers, 2000).

  48. 48.

    Persson, D. et al. Extreme stress tolerance in tardigrades: surviving space conditions in low earth orbit. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 49(Suppl. 1), 90–97 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Guidetti, R., Altiero, T. & Rebecchi, L. On dormancy strategies in tardigrades. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 567–576 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Clegg, J. S. Cryptobiosis – a peculiar state of biological organization. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., part B 128, 613–624 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Carlisle, D. B. Triops (Entomastraca) eggs killed only by boiling. Science 161, 279 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ito, C., Goto, S. & Numata, H. Desiccation and heat tolerance of eggs of the Asian tadpole shrimp, Triops granarius. Zool. Sci. 30, 760–766 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gall, J.-C. & Grauvogel-Stamm, L. The early Middle Triassic ‘Grès à Voltzi’ Formation of eastern France: a model of environmental refugium. C. R. Palevol 4, 637–652 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Trusheim, F. Triopsiden aus dem Keuper-Frankens. Paläontol. Z. 19, 198–216 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wagner, P., Haug, J. T., Sell, J. & Haug, C. Ontogenetic sequence comparison of extant and fossil tadpole shrimps: no support for the “living fossil” concept. Paläontol. Z. 91, 463–472 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lagebro, L. et al. The oldest notostracan (Upper Devonian Strud locality, Belgium). Palaeontology 58, 497–509 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mantovani, B., Cesari, M. & Scanabissi, F. Molecular taxonomy and phylogeny of the “living fossil” lineages Triops and Lepidurus (Branchiopoda: Notostraca). Zool. Scripta 33, 367–374 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Clegg, J. S. & Filosa, M. F. Trehalose in the cellular slime mould, Dictyostelium mucoroides. Nature 192, 1077–1078 (1962).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Brown, W. L. Jr. General adaptation and evolution. Syst. Zool. 7, 157–168 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ross, A. J. Burmese (Myanmar) amber checklist and bibliography 2018. Palaeoentomology 2, 22–84 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cruickshank, R. D. & Ko, K. Geology of an amber locality in the Hukawng Valley, northern Myanmar. J. Asian Earth Sci. 21, 441–455 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Shi, G. et al. Age constrains on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. Cretaceous Res. 37, 155–163 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Yu, T. et al. An ammonite trapped in Burmese amber. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11345–11350 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zheng, D. et al. A Late Cretaceous amber biota from central Myanmar. Nat. Commun. 9, 3170 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Schmidt, A. R. et al. Arthropods in amber from the Triassic Period. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14796–14801 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kettunen, E. et al. Caspary’s fungi from Baltic amber: historic specimens and new evidence. Pap. Palaeontol. 5, 365–389 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank James Zigras for providing the amber specimen to the American Museum of Natural History for research. We are grateful to the editor Luis Buatois and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved the manuscript. We acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of the University of Göttingen.

Author information




J.R. and A.R.S. designed research, imaged fossil and living specimens and analyzed data. D.A.G. discovered the fossil. All authors wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jouko Rikkinen or Alexander R. Schmidt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rikkinen, J., Grimaldi, D.A. & Schmidt, A.R. Morphological stasis in the first myxomycete from the Mesozoic, and the likely role of cryptobiosis. Sci Rep 9, 19730 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing