Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Photoprotection of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles against UVA radiation-induced Senescence of Human Skin Fibroblasts due to their Antioxidant Properties

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, particularly ultraviolet A (UVA), stimulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the epidermis and dermis, which plays a major part in the photoageing of human skin. Several studies have demonstrated that cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NP) can exhibit an antioxidant effect and free radical scavenging activity. However, the protective role of CeO2 NP in skin photoageing and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of CeO2 NP on UVA-irradiated human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and explored the potential signalling pathway. CeO2 NP had no apparent cytotoxicity, and could reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines, intracellular ROS, senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity, and downregulate phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) after exposure to UVA radiation. Based on our findings, CeO2 NPs have great potential against UVA radiation-induced photoageing in HSFs via regulating the JNK signal-transduction pathway to inhibit oxidative stress and DNA damage.

Introduction

Skin ageing is caused by environmental aggressors and the passage of time, and is one of the most common dermatologic concerns1,2. It is classified into two types—“intrinsic ageing” (attributed to the influence of genes and hormones) and “extrinsic ageing” (induced by environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, poor nutrition and solar radiation)3,4. Extrinsic ageing is mainly “photoageing”, which is caused by a combination of wavelengths of light, such as the visible spectrum, infrared radiation and ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Photoageing occurs with the ageing of epidermal and dermal cells. Senescent cells can, in general, be recognized by changes in morphology, high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enhanced activity of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) in lysosomal systems5,6,7. Increased release of secretory proteins such as interleukins (ILs), chemokines and growth factors is another hallmark of senescent cells5,8. Among the ILs secreted by senescent cells, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-1βare the most important9.

At present, UV radiation in sunlight is recognized as the important factor that induces photoageing, particularly ultraviolet A (UVA, 320–400 nm) radiation. UVA accounts for >95% of solar UV radiation and is present in sunlight all day. It can penetrate deep into the epidermis and dermis to cause photo-carcinogenesis, and has a critical role in photoageing10. Inflammation and overexpressed ROS are the two major pathogeneses of skin photoageing11. Inflammatory factors and high production of ROS can induce lipid peroxidation and oxidation of proteins and carbohydrates, as well as their accumulation in the dermis and epidermis of photo-damaged skin.

In the past decade, a growing number of nanomaterials have been implemented for biomedical areas, such as the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast media, drug carriers, and nanometer catalysts12. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NP) are rare earth metal oxide material of the lanthanide elements, which have excellent biocompatibility and unique antioxidant capacity13,14,15. They are used in catalytic agents, metal-polishing agents, gas transducers, UV-screening agents, solar batteries, and solid oxide fuel cells16,17,18,19. The antioxidant properties of CeO2 NP have been attributed to the co-existence of two valence states in CeO2 (Ce3+ and Ce4+), with circular redox reactions occurring between these two oxidation states20,21. In these redox cycles, Ce4+ reverts to Ce3+ to leave equal numbers of oxygen vacancies as compensation. It has been revealed recently that the defect concentration at the CeO2 surface increases upon exposure to water, which could be relevant in living systems22. Recent studies have shown that CeO2 NP can protect neurocytes14,23,24 and myocardial cells25,26 against ROS damage by scavenging free radicals15. Genchi et al. found that CeO2 NP could potentially protect rat muscle cells against oxidative stress associated with microgravity and cosmic radiation by modulating gene expression27. Furthermore, CeO2 NP can suppress inflammation28 and diseases related to responses to oxidative stress, such as obesity29.

In the present study, we wished to ascertain if CeO2 NP could inhibit skin photoageing by clearing intracellular ROS. Hence, we proposed to build a model of skin photoageing by irradiating human skin fibroblasts with UVA in vitro. We evaluated the physical and chemical properties of CeO2 NP, their ability to participate in antioxidant defence, and the potential mechanism of action. Our data demonstrated the applications of CeO2 NP in research on the oxidative stress-related damage of skin photoageing and its potential prevention, and suggested that CeO2 NP could act as excellent photoprotective ingredients in cosmetics.

Results

Characterization of CeO2 NP

The morphology and size of CeO2 NP were determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM images indicated that primary CeO2 NP appeared to be near spherical rather than polyhedral with regular morphology, and they had an aspect ratio close to 1 with uniform sizes of 10 ± 2.0 nm (Fig. 1A). However, NP were not negatively dyed with phosphotungstic acid, so BSA on the surface of NP could not be observed by TEM, which may cause the size of CeO2 NP to appear smaller than their actual size. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to observe the hydrodynamic size distribution and zeta potential of CeO2 NP. The hydrated particle size of NP was ~197.6 nm, which have could have been due to slight agglomeration of NP and the presence of a hydration layer on their surface (Fig. 1B). The zeta potential of bare CeO2 NP and CeO2 NP with a BSA coating was about 35.7 mV and −2.87 mV, respectively, showing that modification of BSA reduced the positive charge of NP (Fig. 1C). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed that CeO2 NP consisted of a mixture of Ce3+ and Ce4+ species (Fig. 1D). The Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio is 0.80 in the mixture, with the proportions of Ce3+ and Ce4+ being 44.56% and 55.44% respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

Characterization of CeO2 NP. (A) TEM image of CeO2 NP. The scale bar represents 20 nm. (B) The size distribution of CeO2 NP by DLS. (C) The zeta potential of CeO2 NP coated with BSA, and (inset) the zeta potential of CeO2 NP without BSA. (D) XPS spectrum of CeO2 NP showing a mixed valence (Ce3+ and Ce4+) state.

Effect of exposure of CeO2 NP on HSFs viability

Cell viability using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) kit revealed that CeO2 NP did not cause cytotoxicity after exposure for 24, 48 or 96 h, even at a high concentration of 100 μg/mL (Fig. 2A). The Annexin-V-FITC/PI assay was carried out to measure apoptosis after CeO2 NP treatment: significant apoptosis was not observed in any group (Fig. 2B). These results suggested their excellent biocompatibility and the possibility of a huge variety of biologic applications (e.g., nano-sized medicine carriers for targeted therapies).

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of treatment by CeO2 NP on the viability and apoptosis of HSFs. (A) HSFs were treated with different concentrations of CeO2 NP for 24, 48 and 96 h, respectively. Then, HSF cell viability was evaluated by the CCK-8 assay. (B) Flow cytometric profiles of Annexin V-FITC/PI -stained apoptotic cells treated with CeO2 NP. (C) Fluorescence images using Calcein-AM staining. The scale bars in these images represent 50 µm.

Calcein-AM can pass through intact cell membranes and stay in the cytoplasm, where it is hydrolyzed into calcein by esterases, thereby emitting strong green fluorescence. In this assay, all HSFs were stained green and surviving cells were round after UVA irradiation alone (Fig. 2C), which is a typical change in cell morphology during apoptosis. However, in the CeO2 NP group, cells were viable with normal morphology in accordance with cells in the control group. These findings suggested the photoprotective effects of CeO2 NP against the cell injury induced by UVA irradiation.

Effect of CeO2 NP on UVA radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity in HSFs

The activity of SA-β-gal, biomarker of skin ageing, was evaluated by SA-β-gal staining assay carried out as mentioned previously30,31,32. SA-β-gal activity was enhanced with increasing doses of UVA irradiation (Fig. 3A). We chose a moderate intensity (100 mJ/cm2) for UVA exposure in subsequent studies based on Fig. 3A. CeO2 NP attenuated SA-β-gal activity in HSFs exposed to UVA radiation (100 mJ/cm2) clearly compared with treatment with UV radiation alone (Fig. 3B). These results demonstrated photoageing suppression by CeO2 NP.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of CeO2 NP on SA-β-gal activity in HSFs. (A) HSFs were irradiated by serial doses of UVA (50, 100, or 200 mJ/cm2) and stained with SA-β-gal. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative fluorescence images of cell nuclei stained with DAPI (blue) and SA-β-gal (green) in cells pretreated or not with CeO2 NP before exposure (or not) to UVA radiation (100 mJ/cm2). Scale bar = 20 μm.

CeO2 NP suppress UVA radiation-induced ROS generation in HSFs

To confirm that CeO2 NP attenuated SA-β-gal activity in HSFs after exposure to UVA radiation by ROS scavenging, we measured intracellular ROS production using 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a ROS fluorescent probe that emits green fluorescence when oxidized by ROS.

A very weak fluorescence signal was observed in untreated cells and cells exposed only to CeO2 NP, whereas a much stronger fluorescence signal was observed after UVA irradiation (100 mJ/cm2) (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the bright fluorescence signal was inhibited remarkably when CeO2 NP (50 μg/mL) were added (Fig. 4B). The results of quantitative measurements were consistent with the findings mentioned above (Fig. 4A). Several studies have shown, in accordance with our findings, that CeO2 NP can scavenge free radicals24,26,33.

Figure 4
figure 4

CeO2 NP suppress intracellular ROS production induced by UVA radiation. HSFs were treated, washed, and stained as mentioned in the Materials and Methods section. ROS levels in HSF cells were measured by a flow cytometer (A) and an inverted fluorescence microscope (B) labelled with DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C. Scale bar = 10 µm.

CeO2 NP protect HSFs from producing inflammatory factors and matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 induced by exposure to UVA radiation

IL-6, IL-8 and MMPs are the most prominent biomarkers of cell ageing34. Quantitative real-time quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and ELISAs were applied to measure expression of IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-2 at gene and protein levels, respectively.

Relative RNA expression and concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and MMP-2 in culture supernatants were increased significantly after exposure to UVA radiation compared with untreated cells (P < 0.05; Fig. 5). The presence of CeO2 NP led to suppression of the production of IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-2 upon simultaneous exposure to UVA radiation (Fig. 5). We did not observe dose-dependent protective effects of CeO2 NP on HSFs upon exposure to UV radiation.

Figure 5
figure 5

Biomarker expression in photoaged cells at gene and protein levels. (A) Relative mRNA expression of IL-6, IL-8 and MMP-2 compared with untreated cells. Data are represented as fold-changes. GAPDH was the internal reference gene in RT-PCR. (B) Concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 in culture supernatants collected after exposure were examined using ELISA kits. Protein expression of MMP-2 after exposure to CeO2 NP or UVA radiation was determined by western blotting. β-Actin was the loading control for western blotting. Data are representative of three separate experiments. Data are the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, compared with the control group. #p < 0.05, compared with the group treated only with UVA radiation.

CeO2 NP inhibited UVA radiation-stimulated activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) in HSFs

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal-transduction pathway has a critical role in UV radiation-stimulated pathways, and modulates a sequence of downstream responses in human skin cells35. We examined the potential signalling pathways in UV radiation-induced skin ageing.

The phosphorylation of JNKs and c-Jun was induced by exposure to UVA radiation (Fig. 6), and then resulted in increased production of MMP-2 through a series of reactions. Addition of CeO2 NP reduced the expression of phosphorylated-JNKs, phosphorylated-c-Jun, and MMP-2 generation on account of UVA irradiation.

Figure 6
figure 6

Western blotting of proteins to show the photoageing mechanism. HSFs were pretreated with (or without) CeO2 NP (25, 50 or 100 μg/mL), and irradiated (or not) by UVA. β-actin was the loading control for these analyses.

Discussion

Over recent decades, nanotechnology has attracted considerable attention, and has been applied to biomedical applications such as treatment of cancer and photoageing36. Among these nanomaterials, CeO2 NP have been reported to exhibit antioxidant effects by scavenging free radicals in cells, and exerting catalytic effects by mimicking superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities12,37. The redox properties and toxicity of CeO2 NP are affected by their size, morphology, surface chemistry, and other factors, such as additives that coat the surface, local pH, and ligands that can participate in redox reactions38,39. CeO2 NP can internalize in human and animal cell lines and tissues and then localize with mitochondria, lysosomes and endoplasmic reticula as well as being abundant in the cytoplasm and the nucleus, thereby imparting protection against various oxidants40,41. The catalytic activity of CeO2 NP is dependent upon the surface Ce3+/Ce4+ oxidation state. CeO2 NP with a higher Ce3+ to Ce4+ ratio show higher SOD mimetic activity, and are more effective against oxidative stress-associated diseases or inflammation. NP with a lower Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio display higher catalase mimetic activity and possess anticancer or antibacterial activity41,42. Some studies have revealed that co-doped CeO2 NP can be used as clinical contrast agents for imaging and as therapeutic agents for cancer43,44. Prevention and treatment of skin photoageing have been the focus of scholarly research in recent years45. Nanomaterials are being used in cosmetics and skin-care products, especially NP of titanium oxide and zinc oxide. However, these NP have been reported recently to cause inflammation followed by ROS production, which can induce considerable damage to DNA46,47. In addition, reports have shown that these NP cannot reach the deeper stratum through the cuticle of the skin48. Therefore, we need try to find an efficient NP. Reports have shown that CeO2 NP can serve as effective radioprotectants for normal tissues, imparting protection against ROS49,50. Due to these characteristics, CeO2 NP have been used to protect against laser-induced retinal damage to reduce chronic inflammation51,52. Nevertheless, whether CeO2 NP can mitigate cellular senescence triggered by UV irradiation is not known. The present study was designed to verify the protective properties of CeO2 NP from UVA radiation-induced photoageing in HSFs, and postulated the potential signalling pathways involved.

Excessive production of ROS such as hydrogen peroxide, singlet oxygen, and hydroxyl radicals has been found to cause DNA injury and peroxidation of proteins and lipids, and can result in cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or premature senility37. Studies have revealed a strong relationship between UV radiation and ROS generation53,54. Constant irradiation with UV light can give rise to inflammatory responses, break intracellular oxidation–reduction equilibria, contributing to ROS accumulation and, consequently, photoageing. Our findings suggest that exposure to UVA radiation could increase ROS generation dramatically, and that addition of CeO2 NP inhibited UVA radiation-stimulated overexpression of ROS in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4). The results of our studies are consistent with those mentioned above.

Cutaneous ageing involves reduced levels of mature collagen and enhanced expression of MMPs as well as degradation of proteins such as collagens, elastin, proteoglycans and fibronectin in the extracellular matrix55,56,57. MMP-1 breaks down collagen initially, and collagen is broken down further by MMP-2 and 9, which are crucial participators in the intrinsic and extrinsic ageing (photoageing) of skin55,56. We analyzed MMP-2 expression at gene and protein levels (Fig. 5). MMP-2 expression showed a dose-dependent decrease when HSFs were pretreated with CeO2 NP and exposed to UVA radiation (Fig. 5). We also evaluated SA-β-gal activity and secretion of cytokines such as interleukin IL-6 and IL-8, which are representative biomarkers of skin photoageing (Fig. 5). Our results indicated that expression of these markers, as a result of exposure to UVA radiation, was reduced by CeO2 NP pretreatment. We investigated UVA radiation-stimulated signal-transduction pathways by western blotting. A large body of evidence describes the role of the MAPK signalling pathway in UV radiation-activated skin damage. According to those studies, the increased production of ROS owing to UV radiation induces activation of the MAPK signalling pathway, which comprises JNKs, p38, MAPK, and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs)53. Subsequently, activator protein-1 (a heterodimer of c-Fos and c-Jun) and nuclear factor-kappa B are activated to modulate cellular proliferation and differentiation as well as inflammation and vasculogenesis57,58. In our study, ROS accumulation induced by UVA irradiation caused the phosphorylation of JNKs and c-Jun, resulting in incremental production of IL-6, IL-8 and MMP-2 through a series of reactions. Addition of CeO2 NP reduced the expression of phosphorylated-JNKs, phosphorylated-c-Jun, and IL-6, as well as the generation of IL-8 and MMP-2 resulting from UVA irradiation (Figs 5, 6).

Based on our findings, we hypothesize that CeO2 NP have great potential against UVA radiation-induced photoageing in HSFs because they can inhibit oxidative stress and DNA damage via regulation of the JNKs signal-transduction pathway. CeO2 NP could be used as photoprotective agents in the manufacture of cosmetics, applied in treatment of oxidative stress-associated diseases and prevention of skin photoageing.

Methods

Characterization of CeO2 NP

CeO2 NP were obtained from the Key Laboratory for the Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety within the National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China). Analyses of morphology and size were undertaken using a transmission electron microscope (G-20; FEI, Hilsboro, OR, USA) at an operating voltage of 200 kV. The hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of CeO2 NP were measured by DLS using a ZetaSizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) at room temperature. XPS was used to identify the valence state of Ce3+ and Ce4+.

Cell culture

A HSF line was purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (HyClone, Jülich, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. In most studies, HSFs were starved upon reaching 85–90% confluence and used within passages 2–5.

CeO2 NP treatment and exposure to UVA radiation

In experiments involving exposure to UV radiation, HSFs were pretreated with CeO2 NP dispersed in FBS-free medium for 24 h. Next, the suspensions of CeO2 NP were discarded, and cells were washed twice using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Then, HSFs were maintained with a thin layer of PBS and irradiated with UVA (100 mJ/cm2). An ultraviolet lamp (peak, 365 nm; Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France) delivered uniform radiation at 10 cm. After exposure to UVA radiation, HSFs were incubated with FBS-free media for an additional time according to the requirements of subsequent experiments.

Cell-viability assays

To evaluate the viability of HSFs after exposure to CeO2 NP, we used a CCK-8 kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) for quantitative analyses and a LIVE/DEAD Cell Double Staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich) for qualitative analyses.

For the CCK-8 assay, HSFs were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated until they reached 70–75% confluence. Next, they were exposed to CeO2 NP (0, 1.5625, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 or 100 μg/mL) for 24, 48 or 96 h, respectively. After exposure, PBS was used to wash cells twice. Then, 100 µL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well and incubated for an additional 1 h in an incubator. The absorbance of each well at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader (Multiskan; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) after incubation.

In the calcein-AM staining assay, we seeded HSFs in 24-well plates and cultured them for 24 h. Then, HSFs were pretreated with fresh medium or CeO2 NP, before exposure (or no exposure) to UVA radiation. After treatments, HSFs were washed twice with PBS and stained by probes for 15 min. Fluorescence images were recorded using an inverted luminescence microscope (X73; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) after being washed thrice with PBS.

Measurement of intracellular ROS production

ROS production in HSFs was assessed using the fluorescence probe DCFH-DA (Life Technologies). HSFs were grown in six-well plates and then the two groups were exposed to CeO2 NP for 24 h. After cells had been washed with PBS and labelled with 20 µM of DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C in an incubator in the dark, they were washed thrice and irradiated by UVA (100 mJ/cm2). Six-hours later, HSFs were collected by centrifugation (2000 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C) followed by detection using a flow cytometer at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 530 nm. Intracellular ROS levels were in proportion to a mean fluorescence signal intensity of 10,000 HSFs.

An inverted fluorescence microscope was used to document fluorescence images for qualitative investigations after cells had been cultured in 24-well plates and treated, washed, and stained as mentioned above.

qRT-PCR

HSFs were cultured in six-well plates and treated with CeO2 NP or UVA irradiation (100 mJ/cm2). Then, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® Reagent (Sigma–Aldrich) following manufacturer instructions. A reverse-transcriptase system (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) using 2 μg of total RNA was employed. A real-time PCR instrument (Realplex4; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) was used for PCR amplification. Each sample was assayed in triplicate.

The primer sequences (forward and reverse, respectively) were: 5′-TGAGAACGGGAAGCTTGTCA-3′ and 5′-ATCGCCCCACTTGATTTTGG-3′ for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 5′-GGACTTAGACCGCTTGGCTT-3′ and 5′-GTGTTCAGGTATTGCATGTGCT-3′ for MMP-2; 5′-GGATTCAATGAGGAGACTTGCC-3′ and 5′-TGGCATTTGTGGTTGGGTCA-3′ for IL-6; 5′-CACCGGAAGGAACCATCTCA-3′ and 5′-TGGCAAAACTGCACCTTCACA-3′ for IL-8. All of primers were designed by Primer Premier 5.0.

Determination of cytokine levels using ELISAs

HSFs were grown in 24-well plates, pretreated with CeO2 NP for 24 h, and exposed to UVA radiation. Then, culture supernatants were collected and examined using human IL-6 and IL-8 ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. Concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 were obtained using standard curves.

Senescence-associated SA-β-gal activity

Measurement of SA-β-gal activity was done by SA-β-gal staining using a Senescence β-galactosidase staining kit (Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). First, HSFs were cultivated in 24-well plates, pretreated with CeO2 NP, and exposed to UVA radiation. After washing with PBS, 3% formaldehyde was employed to fix cells for 5 min at room temperature. Next, HSFs were washed before incubation with a SA-β-gal probe for 6 h. Images were obtained by a fluorescence inverted microscope.

Western blotting

HSFs were cultured, treated with CeO2 NP before exposure to UVA radiation as stated above, and washed twice with cold PBS. RIPA lysis buffer with the addition of protease inhibitors (1 mM of phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride) was applied to HSFs lysing on ice. After centrifugation (14,000 g, 10 min, 4 °C), the total protein concentration was quantified using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Proteins were separated by 10% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, and blocked with 5% skimmed-milk powder. After PVDF membranes had been labelled with various primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, they were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The signal visualization of proteins was carried out by an Odyssey Infrared Imaging system (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NB, USA).

Statistical analyses

Results are the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were done using the Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA using SPSS v20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.

References

  1. Krutmann, J., Bouloc, A., Sore, G., Bernard, B. A. & Passeron, T. The skin aging exposome. Journal of Dermatological Science 85, 152–161 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann, S. G., Bourgoinvoillard, S., Seve, M. & Rachidi, W. Tubulin Beta-3 Chain as a New Candidate Protein Biomarker of Human Skin Aging: A Preliminary Study. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2017, (2017-5-14) 2017, 5140360 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhard, D., Moser, C., Backovic, A. & Wick, G. Cigarette smoke–an aging accelerator? Exp Gerontol 42, 160–165 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng, J. P. et al. Repeated exposure of mouse dermal fibroblasts at a sub-cytotoxic dose of UVB leads to premature senescence: a robust model of cellular photoaging. Journal of Dermatological Science 73, 49 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campisi, J. & D’Adda, d.F. F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 729 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hein, N. et al. The Nucleolus and Ribosomal Genes in Aging and Senescence. (InTech, 2012).

  7. Passos, J. F. et al. Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 347–347 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davalos, A. R., Jean-Philippe, C., Judith, C. & Pierre-Yves, D. Senescent cells as a source of inflammatory factors for tumor progression. Cancer & Metastasis Reviews 29, 273–283 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuilman, T. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network. Cell 133, 1019 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaar, M. & Gilchrest, B. A. Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy. Br. J. Dermatol. 157, 874 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pillai, S., Oresajo, C. & Hayward, J. Ultraviolet radiation and skin aging: roles of reactive oxygen species, inflammation and protease activation, and strategies for prevention of inflammation-induced matrix degradation – a review. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci. 27, 17 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Celardo, I., Pedersen, J. Z., Traversa, E. & Ghibelli, L. Pharmacological potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 3, 1411–1420, https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00875c (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, J., Patil, S., Seal, S. & Mcginnis, J. F. Rare earth nanoparticles prevent retinal degeneration induced by intracellular peroxides. Nature Nanotechnology 1, 142–150 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Das, M. et al. Auto-catalytic Ceria Nanoparticles Offer Neuroprotection to Adult Rat Spinal Cord Neurons. Biomaterials 28, 1918–1925 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karakoti, A., Singh, S., Dowding, J. M., Seal, S. & Self, W. T. Redox-active radical scavenging nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4422 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, X., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Wang, S. & Wu, S. Preparation and characterization of CuO/CeO2 catalysts and their applications in low-temperature CO oxidation. Applied Catalysis A General 295, 142–149 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng, X. et al. Converting ceria polyhedral nanoparticles into single-crystal nanospheres. Science 37, 1504–1508 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Toni, A. M., Yin, S. & Sato, T. Enhancement of Calcia Doped Ceria Nanoparticles Performance as UV Shielding Material. Advances in Science & Technology 45, 673–678 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Esposito, V. & Enrico, T. Design of Electroceramics for Solid Oxides Fuel Cell Applications: Playing with Ceria. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1037–1051 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heckert, E., Karakoti, A. S. & Self, W. The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 29, 2705 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, X., Zhou, K., Wang, L., Wang, B. & Li, Y. Oxygen Vacancy Clusters Promoting Reducibility and Activity of Ceria Nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3140 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fronzi, M., Piccinin, S., Delley, B., Traversa, E. & Stampfl, C. Water adsorption on the stoichiometric and reduced CeO2(111) surface: a first-principles investigation. PCCP 11, 9188–9199 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh, N., Cohen, C. A. & Rzigalinski, B. A. Treatment of neurodegenerative disorders with radical nanomedicine. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1122, 219–230 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, C. K. et al. Ceria nanoparticles that can protect against ischemic stroke. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 11039–11043, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201203780 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Niu, J., Azfer, A., Rogers, L. M., Wang, X. & Kolattukudy, P. E. Cardioprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a transgenic murine model of cardiomyopathy. Cardiovascular Research 73, 549–559 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pagliari, F. et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect cardiac progenitor cells from oxidative stress. ACS nano 6, 3767–3775 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Genchi, G. G. et al. Modulation of gene expression in rat muscle cells following treatment with nanoceria in different gravity regimes. Nanomedicine (Lond), https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0316 (2018).

  28. Hirst, S. M. et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Small 5, 2848–2856 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rocca, A. et al. Pilot in vivo investigation of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a novel anti-obesity pharmaceutical formulation. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology & Medicine 11, 1725–1734 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, H. K. Protective Effect of Garlic on Cellular Senescence in UVB-Exposed HaCaT Human Keratinocytes. Nutrients 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8080464 (2016).

  31. Wang, A. S., Ong, P. F., Chojnowski, A., Clavel, C. & Dreesen, O. Loss of lamin B1 is a biomarker to quantify cellular senescence in photoaged skin. Sci Rep 7, 15678, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15901-9 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Debacqchainiaux, F., Erusalimsky, J. D., Campisi, J. & Toussaint, O. Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-betagal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo. Nature Protocols 4, 1798 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, S. et al. Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating. ACS Nano 7, 9693–9703 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maria, J. & Ingrid, Z. Effects of bioactive compounds on senescence and components of senescence associated secretory phenotypes in vitro. Food Funct 8, 2394–2418, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fo00161d (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schieke, S. M., Ruwiedel, K., Gersbarlag, H., Gretherbeck, S. & Krutmann, J. Molecular Crosstalk of the Ultraviolet A and Ultraviolet B Signaling Responses at the Level of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 124, 857–859 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu, X., Li, F., Wang, S., Xia, F. & Ling, D. Biological Stimulus-Driven Assembly/Disassembly of Functional Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery, Controlled Activation, and Bioelimination. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 1800359 (2018).

  37. Celardo, I. et al. Ce3+ Ions Determine Redox-Dependent Anti-apoptotic Effect of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles. Acs Nano 5, 4537–4549 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Grulke, E. et al. Nanoceria: factors affecting its pro- and anti-oxidant properties. Environmentalence Nano 1, 429–444 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Das, S. et al. Tissue deposition and toxicological effects of commercially significant rare earth oxide nanomaterials: Material and physical properties. Environ. Toxicol. 32, 904–917 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, S., Kumar, A., Karakoti, A., Seal, S. & Self, W. T. Unveiling the mechanism of uptake and sub-cellular distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Molecular Biosystems 6, 1813 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pulidoreyes, G. et al. Untangling the biological effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles: the role of surface valence states. Scientific Reports 5 (2015).

  42. Gupta, A., Das, S., Neal, C. J. & Seal, S. Controlling the surface chemistry of cerium oxide nanoparticles for biological applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 4, 3195–3202 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Babu, S. et al. Multicolored redox active upconverter cerium oxide nanoparticle for bio-imaging and therapeutics. Chem. Commun. 46, 6915 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alili, L. et al. Downregulation of tumor growth and invasion by redox-active nanoparticles. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 19, 765–778 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chien, A. L. et al. Effect of Age, Gender, and Sun Exposure on Ethnic Skin Photoaging: Evidence Gathered Using a New Photonumeric Scale. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 110, 176 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xia, T. et al. Comparison of the Mechanism of Toxicity of Zinc Oxide and Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Dissolution and Oxidative Stress Properties. ACS Nano 2, 2121–2134, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800511k (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schanen, B. C. et al. Exposure to titanium dioxide nanomaterials provokes inflammation of an in vitro human immune construct. Acs Nano 3, 2523–2532 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Newman, M. D., Stotland, M. & Ellis, J. I. The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide- and zinc oxide-based sunscreens. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 61, 685–692 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Colon, J. et al. Protection from radiation-induced pneumonitis using cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology & Medicine 5, 225–231 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Karakoti, A. S. et al. Nanoceria as Antioxidant: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. JOM 60, 33–37 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cimini, A. et al. Antibody-conjugated PEGylated cerium oxide nanoparticles for specific targeting of Aβ aggregates modulate neuronal survival pathways. Acta Biomater. 8, 2056–2067 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chigurupati, S. et al. Effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the growth of keratinocytes, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells in cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials 34, 2194–2201 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Natarajan, V. T., Ganju, P., Ramkumar, A., Grover, R. & Gokhale, R. S. Multifaceted pathways protect human skin from UV radiation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 542–551, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1548 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kammeyer, A. & Luiten, R. M. Oxidation events and skin aging. Ageing Res Rev 21, 16–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.01.001 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xia, W., Quan, T., Hammerberg, C., Voorhees, J. J. & Fisher, G. J. A mouse model of skin aging: Fragmentation of dermal collagen fibrils and reduced fibroblast spreading due to expression of human matrix metalloproteinase-1. Journal of Dermatological Science 78, 79–82 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Purohit, T. et al. Smad3-dependent regulation of type I collagen in human dermal fibroblasts: Impact on human skin connective tissue aging. Journal of Dermatological Science 83, 80–83 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cavinato, M. & Jansen-Durr, P. Molecular mechanisms of UVB-induced senescence of dermal fibroblasts and its relevance for photoaging of the human skin. Exp Gerontol 94, 78–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.01.009 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bickers, D. R. & Athar, M. Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Skin Disease. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 126, 2565 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 81572976, 81872493, 81803151), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Nos 2016M590505, 2017T100407), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX17_1718), the Jiangsu Provincial Medical Talent Foundation, the ‘Six Talent Peaks’ Project of Jiangsu Province (Nos WSW-074, WSN-254), and the Science and Technology Project of Huai’an city (No. HAB201812).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yaxi Li, Xiaoyang Hou, Chunsheng Yang, Guan Jiang and Yanqun Liu participated in the designing and conceiving of the research; Yaxi Li, Xiaoyang Hou and Chunsheng Yang prepared and executed experiments; Xinxin Li and Yanyu Pang analysed and interpreted data; Yaxi Li, Xiaoyang Hou and Chunsheng Yang wrote the manuscript. All listed authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript prior to publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guan Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Hou, X., Yang, C. et al. Photoprotection of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles against UVA radiation-induced Senescence of Human Skin Fibroblasts due to their Antioxidant Properties. Sci Rep 9, 2595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39486-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39486-7

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing