Abstract
Cost-effective reduced graphene oxide sheets decorated with magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (Fe3O4-rGO) are successfully fabricated via a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique using iron (III) nitrate as an iron precursor, with glucose and CH4 as carbon sources, and NaCl as a supporting material. TEM analysis and Raman spectroscopy reveal hierarchical nanostructures of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Fe K-edge x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra confirm that the nanoparticles are Fe3O4 with a slight shift of the pre-edge peak position toward higher energy suggesting that the fabricated Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a higher average oxidation state than that of a standard Fe3O4 compound. The hierarchical Fe3O4-rGO is found to exhibit an excellent catalytic activity toward the reduction of triiodide to iodide in a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) and can deliver a solar cell efficiency of 6.65%, which is superior to a Pt-based DSSC (6.37%).
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Graphene is one of the most attractive two-dimensional nanostructured materials, which is extensively employed in a variety of applications due to its many exceptional properties such as high electrical conductivity, large specific surface area and high chemical and mechanical stabilities1. In a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) application2, a material with high catalytic activity and conductivity is desirable for use as a counter electrode replacing expensive and scarce Pt. Graphene or graphene-related nanomaterials are ideally suited for this purpose in DSSCs because of their high electrical conductivity and large specific surface area.
Among the proposed Pt-free counter electrodes, carbonaceous materials3,4,5,6,7, conductive organic polymers8, metal sulfides9,10,11,12, metal nitrides13,14, metal carbides15,16 and metal oxides17,18. Fe oxides are one of the most abundant and environmentally-friendly substances whose well-known forms include magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3). It is notable for its catalytic properties19,20. The superior catalytic activity of rust (α-Fe2O3) toward triiodide reduction was theoretically predicted and experimentally confirmed to be comparable to that of Pt19. Moreover, Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 nanosheets were also noted for their superior electrocatalytic activities and photovoltaic performance in DSSCs compared to α-Fe2O320. This is attributed to the presence of equal numbers of divalent and trivalent iron ions (Fe2+ and Fe3+) in octahedron sites in a cubic inverse spinel structure of Fe3O4. This provides for electron hopping transport giving rise to its lower resistance compared to other crystal phases (α-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3)21,22. Therefore, the synergetic effects of high electrical conductivity and catalytic activity can be achieved from a composite of graphene and Fe3O4, enhancing the photovoltaic efficiency of DSSCs.
Many studies of graphene-based Fe3O4 nanocomposites have been previously reported. Most of them used reduced graphene oxide-Fe3O4 (rGO-Fe3O4) that exhibited outstanding electrochemical properties and were employed as supercapacitor electrode materials23,24,25. These imply the feasibility of the composites to promote electrocatalytic activities toward triiodide reduction in the case of DSSCs. Recently, highly dispersed Fe3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) have shown superior catalytic activity in reducing triiodide to iodide in DSSCs. This resulted in the highest ever reported efficiency of 9% (Pt ~ 9.46%)26.
rGO is a chemically derived graphene obtained from reducing graphene oxide (GO). It is considered a cost-effective graphene-based material that offers many advantages including good dispersibility in water enabling solution processability and versatile properties via specialized chemical functionalization27. Fe3O4-rGO composite materials were fabricated using various methods and typically a GO solution was employed as a precursor, which was generally prepared by a modified Hummers’ method24,25,28,29,30.
In this work, an excellent counter electrode material made of a Fe3O4-rGO nanocomposite was fabricated via a CVD based technique using glucose and CH4 as carbon sources and NaCl crystal as a supporting material. The as-synthesized Fe3O4-GO nanocomposites were achieved by dissolving the CVD product in water to remove NaCl crystals. It was then thermally reduced to form Fe3O4-rGO nanocomposites. Unlike previous fabrication methods of rGO composites, GO precursor is not required. The obtained Fe3O4-rGO exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity and power conversion efficiency that was superior to the Pt DSSC. The fabrication and characterization of the Fe3O4-rGO nanocomposite are presented in this paper. The photovoltaic performance and electrochemical properties of the Fe3O4- rGO DSSC were investigated.
Results and Discussion
Fabrication of Fe3O4- rGO nanocomposite
The Fe3O4-rGO nanocomposite was synthesized by a CVD technique as described by the schematic diagram in Fig. 1(a). The CVD system consists of a tube furnace with a quartz tube of 2 cm diameter and 100 cm long, vacuum pump, and flow system for CH4 and Ar buffer gas. This CVD system was employed to prepare all the samples in this work. The precursors of the CVD reaction were prepared by dissolving Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (0.50 g), glucose (0.50 g) and NaCl (9 g) in 10 ml DI water. The mixture was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. Then the products were ground to obtain very fine powders that were used as precursors for the CVD process (step i). After placing an alumina combustion boat containing the precursor powders in a tube furnace, the system was purged with Ar for 30 min before the furnace was heated. Then the furnace temperature was raised from room temperature to 800 °C with a flow of Ar to maintain the constant pressure of 1 torr. When the temperature reached 800 °C, Ar gas was stopped. The furnace was then maintained at this reaction temperature with a flow of CH4 at constant flow rate of 2 sccm for 30 min (step ii). After the completion of reaction, the flow of CH4 was stopped and the furnace was cooled down to room temperature under the same Ar flow condition.
This sample was referred to as “FGC”, where F, G, and C represent Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, glucose and CH4, respectively.
Additionally, other composites were synthesized using the precursors prepared from the following mixtures. These include (i) glucose and NaCl with CH4 (without Fe(NO3)3·9H2O) referred to as “GC”, (ii) Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, glucose and NaCl (without CH4) called as “FG”, (iii) Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, NaCl and CH4 (without glucose) referred to as “FC”, and, (iv) Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and NaCl (without glucose and CH4) called as “F”. After the products were cooled to room temperature, they were washed with DI water for several times to remove NaCl (step iii). The products then were centrifuged and dried at 80 °C to obtain the nanocomposite powders (step iv).
Nanostructural characterizations
The SEM images of the NaCl-Glucose-Fe precursor powders, the as-synthesized powder (CVD resultant powders) before and after removing NaCl are shown in Fig. 1(b–d), respectively.
The TEM images of the annealed FGC, FG and GC samples are presented in Fig. 2. Sheet structures of carbon films decorated with nanoparticles were observed in FGC and FG samples, as shown in Fig. 2(a,b), respectively. Nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 10–30 nm in the FGC sample and those with a slightly larger size distribution (from 10-50 nm) in the FG sample were Fe3O4 as indexed from the SAED patterns in Fig. 2(d,e). The measured d-spacings from the patterns correspond to (111), (220), (311), (400), (422), and (511) planes of a cubic Fe3O4 (JCPDS file No. 19-0629). The observed sheet structures in FGC, FG and GC samples were amorphous carbon since there was no diffraction from a graphite structure detected in the SAED pattern (Fig. 2(d–f)). To confirm the crystal structure observed in TEM, XRD analysis of the FGC, FG and GC samples was carried out which showed a consistent result with the TEM as presented in Fig. S1 of the supplement information. The FGC features are distinct in the FG sample in that thin carbon films in the FGC sample had hierarchical structures, whereas those found in the FG sample were relatively flat. This difference in carbon film morphology can be ascribed to the use of CH4 for the CVD reaction in the FGC sample. In the case of the GC sample, which was prepared to investigate the effects of Fe in the composite, carbon films similar to those in the FG sample were observed as shown in Fig. 2(c). For the FC and F samples, Fe3O4 nanoparticles were detected with relatively large particle sizes of 50–80 nm, as shown in Fig. S2 of the supplementary information.
The role of NaCl crystals on the fabrication of the nanocomposites was also investigated by using the precursor powers (only glucose powders and a mixture of glucose and FeNO3) prepared without NaCl crystals for CVD reaction. It was found that without NaCl supporting material the nanocomposite was not deposited; the decomposed carbon molecules were carried away by pressure gradient. After several attempts, we failed to produce the sample without the presence of NaCl supporting material and hence the results of those samples were not included in this report.
XANES spectroscopy is a powerful technique to investigate the local environment of the Fe atom. Fe K-edge XANES spectra of the FGC and FG samples, as well as the standard samples of FeO, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4 are shown in Fig. 3(a). The XANES spectra of the FGC and FG samples had very similar shapes to that of Fe3O4 standard. The pre-edge features of the K-edge of transition metal compounds have been found to be affected by the oxidation state and coordination environment of the atom of interest31,32,33, which can be determined from the pre-edge position and the height of the peak34. The pre-edge position can thus be used to probe the average Fe-redox state31. The pre-edge peak at ~7114 eV is related to the transition from 1s to 3d33. Its shift toward a higher energy indicates an increased oxidation state34. The pre-edge peak of the FGC sample was at a higher energy than that of the Fe3O4 standard, but lower than that of the FG sample, as shown in the first derivative intensity plot of Fig. 3(b). The shift toward a higher energy in the FG sample suggests a larger numbers of Fe3+ ions present in the sample than those of the FGC sample and the Fe3O4 standard. Fe3O4 has a cubic inverse spinel structure, where Fe3+ ions occupy tetrahedral sites and equal numbers of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions occupy the octahedral sites. Its pre-edge peak intensity is approximately a weighted average of tetrahedral and octahedral intensities35. Since the nanoparticle size controls the local order, the pre-edge intensity can also be used to determine the crystallite size of the sample32,34. A lower pre-edge intensity indicates a smaller average particle size of the Fe3O4 in the FGC sample than those in the reference and the FG samples, respectively. This is consistent with the TEM results shown in Fig. 2.
Raman spectroscopy is an excellent technique for characterization of carbon nanomaterials. The Raman spectra in Fig. 4 are from the as-synthesized and as-annealed (at 480 °C for 1 h) FGC, FG and GC samples are denoted as “unannealed” and “annealed”, respectively (Fig. 4(a–c)). Two characteristic peaks of GO are visible in all samples at wavenumbers of ~1,340 and ~1,580 cm−1, which are defined as the D and G peaks, respectively. The D peak originates from out of plane vibrations due to the presence of structural disorders (structural defects, edge effects, and dangling sp2 carbon bonds) whereas the G peak arises from the in-plane vibrations of sp2 carbon atoms, which are common in graphitic materials36. The higher disorder in graphitic plane leads to a broader G band and a broad D band with higher relative intensity compared to that of the G band37. The broad D and G bands can be deconvoluted into four components: D*, D, D** and G centered at 1,200, 1,340, 1,530, and 1,585 cm−1, respectively. (The deconvoluted Raman spectra’s details are shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary Information.) D* and D** are, respectively, the sum and difference of carbon double bond stretching and hydrogen-carbon wagging modes, suggesting that the structures contained a reasonable number of defects38,39. Additionally, another signature band of graphitic sp2 material was observed at 2700–2800 cm−1, called the 2D-band. The intensity ratio; ID/IG, can be used as a measure of defect density which can indicate the quality of GO39. The lower the ID/IG ratio the higher quality of GO40. The rGO is therefore expected to have lower ID/IG since the reduction process could remove the oxygen functional groups from GO and the repair of defects by recovery of hexagonal network40. Therefore, the electrical conductivity can be improved. The ID/IG ratios of all the samples were found to decrease after annealing, i.e., from 1.96 to 1.48 in FGC, from 1.74 to 1.55 in FG and from 1.82 to 1.38 in GC samples. This suggests that upon annealing a considerable number of defects such as oxygen functional groups were removed from the GO sheets, which then became reduced GO (rGO)37.
Moreover, the sharper G peaks in all samples indicate the formation of sp2 hexagonal networks due to the self-recovery of carbon atoms41. It is notable that the 2D band became small modulated bumps that appeared in all the as-annealed samples, suggesting the samples formed wrinkles or corrugated structures which could be the consequence of the reduction process38. Post-annealing is, therefore, regarded as a crucial reduction method for removing defects and facilitating the restoration of sp2 carbon networks.
From these results, we propose a growth mechanism of the Fe3O4-rGO in the FGC sample as shown in the schematic presentation of Fig. 5. During the CVD process, glucose (C6H12O6) is primarily reduced (oxygen and hydrogen atoms are removed) and this carbon source would form a thin carbon layer covering the NaCl crystal surface. NaCl crystals act as seeding templates for carbon (reduced glucose) to transform it into a hexagonal GO network at an elevated temperature (800 °C). Simultaneously, nucleation of Fe3O4 on the GO network took place. The formation of GO on both NaCl and Fe3O4 is possible due to the d-spacing matches of the three materials as listed in Table 1. A hexagonal network of carbon atoms can form on the {100} planes of NaCl as the d-spacing matches between the (100) planes of graphite and the (220) planes of NaCl, as well as those of the (400) planes of Fe3O4. In the presence of CH4, another carbon source, the disassociated carbon atoms continue to grow from the GO sheet edges or nucleate on Fe3O4 nanoparticles generating a hierarchical-like structure as shown in Fig. 2(a). This was detected in the FGC sample but not in the GC sample. Thus, it can be deduced that Fe3O4 nanoparticles can act as another nucleation site for GO formation.
DSSCs performance
The posted annealed FGC, FG, GC, FC, F electrodes and a Pt electrode were used as counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cell devices. The preparation of counter electrode, working electrode, DSSC assembly and cell characteristic measurements are described in the method section. The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves and photovoltaic characteristics of the DSSCs are presented and summarized in Fig. 6 and Table 2, respectively. It was found that the DSSCs with an FGC CE exhibited excellent performance, superior to the Pt CE. The highest achieved power conversion efficiency (η) from FGC DSSCs was 6.65%, which surpassed that of Pt DSSCs (6.37%). The DSSCs with GC and FG CEs also showed promising solar cell efficiencies of 5.99% and 5.41%, respectively. Alternatively, the photovoltaic efficiencies were very low in the FC and F DSSCs. The maximum power conversion efficiency of the FGC DSSC can be deduced from the highest Jsc of 13.74 mA cm−2, which was greater than that of Pt DSSC (13.16 mA cm−2). The Voc values of all DSSCs were comparable and in the range of 0.76–0.77 V.
The highest achieved photovoltaic performance was from the hierarchical rGO with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the FGC sample. In order to investigate the role of each component in the FGC nanocomposite, the correlation of solar cell efficiencies and microstructural characteristics of the three counter electrode materials including FGC, GC and FG samples are considered. In this respect, it is found that the rGO in the GC sample gave the efficiency of upto 5.99%, thus it can be deduced that rGO contribute mainly to the DSSC performance, since rGO is one of components in the FGC CE. The relatively high performance of the produced rGO counter electrode is due to its high electrical conductivity and high specific surface area which are good for electrocatalytic activity toward the reduction of triiodide. Our result showed a consistent trend with many previous studies on using graphene and graphene-related materials as counter electrode7,42,43,44,45,46,47,48.
However, in the rGO with Fe3O4 in the FG sample, the solar cell efficiency dropped to 5.41%. Please note that for the counter electrode preparation the amount of counter electrode materials were controlled by weight. Therefore, GC counter electrode would contain higher rGO content than the FG one that contained rGO plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and hence giving rise to the higher Jsc and solar cell efficiency.
Please also note that rGO sheets both in the GC and FG samples were not in hierarchical structure like those in the FGC sample. Therefore, the surplus efficiency of the FGC counter electrode is therefore attributed to the increased specific surface area of hierarchical rGO and the enhanced redox activity by Fe3O4 catalyst.
EIS measurement was also carried out to investigate electrochemical properties of the FGC, GC and FG CEs using symmetrical cells (CE/electrolyte/CE). The Nyquist plots of the fabricated CEs and Pt with their equivalent circuit are shown in Fig. 7. It sees that the FGC, FG and Pt CEs exhibit single semicircle curve. The series resistance (Rs) correlates with FTO resistance and the contact resistance of CE material and FTO surface, which can be determined from the intercept on the real axis. The Rs values of the FGC, FG, GC and Pt CEs were 7.22, 9.45, 8.50 and 7.23 Ω, respectively. The resistance-capacitance (RC) network of the electrode/electrolyte interface includes the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) and the corresponding capacitance (Cct). The lower Rct value the better charge-transfer between CE and electrolyte, and hence the more effective catalytic activity for triiodide reduction. Among the three CE materials, the FGC electrode had the lowest Rct of 5.3 Ω, lower than that of Pt CE which was 5.4 Ω, and lower than those of GC and FG CEs (~6.5 and 24 Ω, respectively). The Rs and Rct derived from EIS data are summarized in Table 2 and the fitted EIS curves are presented in Fig. S3 of the supplementary information.
The catalytic activities of the CE materials toward the triiodide reduction in DSSC were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) to understand the variation in cell performance. The CV measurements were performed at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1 using the FGC, GC, FG and Pt samples as working electrodes. The results are shown in Fig. 8. For the Pt CE, two pairs of redox peaks were typically visible in the CV. The left and the right pairs corresponded to the redox reactions represented in Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
The role of a CE is to catalyze the reduction of \({I}_{3}^{-}\) to \({I}^{-}\), and this corresponds to the left reduction peak. The low value of the peak to peak separation (Epp), which is inversely correlated with the standard electrochemical rate constant of the redox reaction, and high cathodic peak current density are required for the excellent electrocatalytic performance of a CE. The GC CE had the highest cathodic peak current with a large Epp value of 680 mV, whereas the FGC and FG CEs had smaller Epp values of 324 and 274 mV, respectively. The Epp values of FGC and FG CEs were smaller than that of Pt CE which was 453 mV, indicating that the Fe3O4 can provide high redox reaction rate.
The role of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in counter electrode is to enhance the kinetic of the triiodide reduction process in electrolyte solution by the redox reaction in Equation (3) below.
Fe3O4 contain unequal amount of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in a unit cell. Fe3+ ion is an oxidizing agent or an electron acceptor. Electrons from rGO or FTO can be captured by Fe3+ ions which are then reduced to Fe2+ ions. Fe2+ ions act as electron donor or a reducing agent for triiodide (I3−) to become I− by the reaction in Equation (4) below49.
According to the XANES results, the high oxidation state of FG CE implies a higher Fe3+ to Fe2+ ratio. The larger number of electron acceptors, the faster electron can be transferred, as seen by its corresponding lowest Epp value. The correlation of Epp and XANES results suggests that Fe3O4 nanoparticles play a crucial role in enhancing kinetic of the triiodode reduction by providing fast electron transfer upon Fe3+/Fe2+ redox process.
Please note that the rGO in the FG sample was relatively flat compared to that of the FGC sample which had hierarchical structure, which had more edge sites than that of the flat rGO in FG CE. It has been reported that the edge sites of carbon films are more electrocatalytically reactive than the basal plane50. Consequently, despite the slightly higher Epp value than the FG, the high specific surface area, good electrical conductivity and more electrochemically active edge sites of hierarchical rGO in the FGC sample account for its high cathodic current and low Rct and hence giving rise to the excellent counter electrode performance.
Conclusion
The hierarchical structures of rGO decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles or Fe3O4–rGO nanocomposites with remarkably high catalytic performance toward triiodide reduction were successfully synthesized. This was done via a CVD based fabrication technique using glucose and CH4 as carbon sources and NaCl crystals as a supporting material. A hierarchical structure of Fe3O4–rGO (FGC sample) was not observed when glucose was used as the only carbon source (FG sample). Instead, relatively flat surfaced Fe3O4-rGO nanosheets were obtained. The Fe3O4–rGO CE with hierarchical nanostructures was found to exhibit a maximum energy conversion efficiency of 6.65%, which was superior to a Pt-based DSSC (6.37%). This outstanding performance is attributed to a combination of two factors. First is its superior electrocatalytic activity toward triiodide reduction due to the presence of Fe3+/Fe2+ from Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The second is good electrical conductivity due to a high charge transfer rate with a large number of edge sites and correspondingly higher surface area of the hierarchical rGO nanostructure. This achievement could create opportunities for development of highly efficient DSSC devices with low production costs.
Methods
Counter electrode preparation
The counter electrodes for the DSSCs were prepared by drop coating a 250 µl suspension of the fabricated nanocomposite in acetone (1 mg/ml) on fluoride doped tin oxide (FTO, 7 Ω/square) glass pieces forming four consecutive layers. Then, these films were dried at 80 °C for 1 hour and heated in Ar at 480 °C for 1 hour to reduce the GO and improve the adhesion of the CE material to the FTO surface.
Working electrode preparation
The TiO2 anode was prepared using a previously reported screen printing method17. Briefly, the TiO2 films were fabricated using commercial TiO2 pastes, PST-18NR and PST-400C (JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Company, Japan) on FTO substrates. Then, the FTO/TiO2 samples were annealed at 500 °C for 1 h, and treated with UV radiation for 10 min. Next, the working electrodes were immersed in a dye solution consisting of 0.3 mM cis-bis-(isothiocyanato) bis (2, 2-bipyridyl-4, 4-dicarboxylato)-ruthenium(II)-bis-tetrabutylammonium (N-719, Solaronix), for 24 h to achieve a dye-sensitized electrode.
DSSC assembly
Semi-closed DSSCs were assembled using TiO2 coated dye-sensitizer films as the working electrode (WE), and the prepared counter electrodes (CE) including those made from FGC, GC, FG, FC, F and Pt. Parafilm was used as a spacer between the working and counter electrodes. A I−/I3− liquid electrolyte (0.05 M I2, 0.10 M LiI, 0.60 M of 1, 2-dimentyl-3-propylimidasolium iodide (MPI), 0.0025 M Li2CO3 and 0.50 M of 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP) in acetonitrile) was injected into the cells.
Film and cell characteristics
The film morphologies and crystal structures were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, LEO 1450 VP, Germany), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI, TECNAI G2, the Netherlands), respectively. Raman spectroscopy was employed to investigate the carbon nanostructures using a triple-monochromator JOBIN YVON HORIBA T64000 spectrometer with a 532 nm laser excitation line. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra for FGC and FC samples were acquired in transmission mode at beamline 1.1 W of the Synchrotron Light Research Institute (SLRI), Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. The photovoltaic performance of the DSSCs was measured using a solar simulator (PEC-L11, Japan) under a light intensity of 100 mW cm−2. Their electrocatalytic activity was analyzed using a cyclic voltammogram (CV, CS150 Electrochemical Workstation, Wuhan Corrtest Instrument Co., Ltd) with a three-electrode system, i.e., an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode, Pt film as the counter electrode and the fabricated materials (FGC, GC and FG) as the working electrodes at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1 in 10 mM LiI, 1 mM I2, and 0.1 M LiClO4 in an acetonitrile solution.
References
Ferrari, A. C. et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr01600a (2015).
O’Regan, B. & Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).
Li, K. et al. Low temperature fabrication of efficient porous carbon counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochemistry Communications 11, 1346–1349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.04.025 (2009).
Han, J., Kim, H., Kim, D. Y., Jo, S. M. & Jang, S.-Y. Water-Soluble Polyelectrolyte-Grafted Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Thin Films for Efficient Counter Electrode of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Nano 4, 3503–3509, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100574g (2010).
Lee, W. J., Ramasamy, E., Lee, D. Y. & Song, J. S. Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Catalytic Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Counter Electrodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1, 1145–1149, https://doi.org/10.1021/am800249k (2009).
Wang, H. & Hu, Y. H. Graphene as a counter electrode material for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science 5, 8182–8188, https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21905k (2012).
Roy-Mayhew, J. D., Bozym, D. J., Punckt, C. & Aksay, I. A. Functionalized Graphene as a Catalytic Counter Electrode in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Nano 4, 6203–6211, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1016428 (2010).
Saranya, K., Rameez, M. & Subramania, A. Developments in conducting polymer based counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells – An overview. European Polymer Journal 66, 207–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.049 (2015).
Yue, G. et al. A counter electrode of multi-wall carbon nanotubes decorated with tungsten sulfide used in dye-sensitized solar cells. Carbon 55, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.045 (2013).
Wang, M. et al. CoS Supersedes Pt as Efficient Electrocatalyst for Triiodide Reduction in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131, 15976–15977, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja905970y (2009).
Li, S., Chen, Z. & Zhang, W. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on WS2 counter electrodes. Materials Letters 72, 22–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.052 (2012).
Dong, F. et al. Hydrothermal growth of MoS2/Co3S4 composites as efficient Pt-free counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Science China Materials 60, 295–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9009-8 (2017).
Li, G. R., Song, J., Pan, G. L. & Gao, X. P. Highly Pt-like electrocatalytic activity of transition metal nitrides for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science 4, 1680–1683, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01105g (2011).
Li, G.-r, Wang, F., Jiang, Q.-w, Gao, X.-p & Shen, P.-w Carbon Nanotubes with Titanium Nitride as a Low-Cost Counter-Electrode Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 49, 3653–3656, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000659 (2010).
Jang, J. S., Ham, D. J., Ramasamy, E., Lee, J. & Lee, J. S. Platinum-free tungsten carbides as an efficient counter electrode for dye sensitized solar cells. Chemical Communications 46, 8600–8602, https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc02247k (2010).
Wu, M., Lin, X., Hagfeldt, A. & Ma, T. Low-Cost Molybdenum Carbide and Tungsten Carbide Counter Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50, 3520–3524, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201006635 (2011).
Wu, M. et al. Economical Pt-Free Catalysts for Counter Electrodes of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 3419–3428, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja209657v (2012).
Uppachai, P. et al. A substoichiometric tungsten oxide catalyst provides a sustainable and efficient counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta 145, 27–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.096 (2014).
Hou, Y. et al. Rational screening low-cost counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat Commun 4, 1583, http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4/n3/suppinfo/ncomms2547_S1.html (2013).
Wang, L. et al. Iron oxide nanostructures as highly efficient heterogeneous catalysts for mesoscopic photovoltaics. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 15279–15283, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta03727h (2014).
Wei, W., Zhaohui, W., Taekyung, Y., Changzhong, J. & Woo-Sik, K. Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 16, 023501 (2015).
Kendelewicz, T. et al. X-ray Photoemission and Density Functional Theory Study of the Interaction of Water Vapor with the Fe3O4(001) Surface at Near-Ambient Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117, 2719–2733, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3078024 (2013).
Wang, Q., Jiao, L., Du, H., Wang, Y. & Yuan, H. Fe3O4 nanoparticles grown on graphene as advanced electrode materials for supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources 245, 101–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.035 (2014).
Yang, Q., Bi, R., Yung, K.-C. & Pecht, M. Electrochemically reduced graphene oxides/nanostructured iron oxides as binder-free electrodes for supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta 231, 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.045 (2017).
Mondal, S., Rana, U. & Malik, S. Reduced Graphene Oxide/Fe3O4/Polyaniline Nanostructures as Electrode Materials for an All-Solid-State Hybrid Supercapacitor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 7573–7583, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10978 (2017).
Zhou, H. et al. Earth-abundant and nano-micro composite catalysts of Fe3O4@reduced graphene oxide for green and economical mesoscopic photovoltaic devices with high efficiencies up to 9%. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4, 67–73, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta06525a (2016).
Chen, D., Feng, H. & Li, J. Graphene Oxide: Preparation, Functionalization, and Electrochemical Applications. Chemical Reviews 112, 6027–6053, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300115g (2012).
Vinothkannan, M., Karthikeyan, C., Gnana kumar, G., Kim, A. R. & Yoo, D. J. One-pot green synthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/Fe3O4 nanocomposites and its catalytic activity toward methylene blue dye degradation. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 136, 256–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.09.031 (2015).
Zhang, H. et al. Room temperature fabrication of an RGO-Fe3O4 composite hydrogel and its excellent wave absorption properties. RSC Advances 4, 14441–14446, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44745f (2014).
Cao, W., Ma, Y., Zhou, W. & Guo, L. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of rGO-Fe3O4 hybrid nanocomposite for removal of Pb(II) via magnetic separation. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 31, 508–513, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-015-4487-6 (2015).
Wilke, M., Farges, F., Petit, P.-E., Brown, G. E. & Martin, F. Oxidation state and coordination of Fe in minerals: An Fe K-XANES spectroscopic study. American Mineralogist 86, 714–730, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2001-5-612 (2001).
Balasubramanian, C. et al. X-ray absorption spectroscopy characterization of iron-oxide nanoparticles synthesized by high temperature plasma processing. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 196, 125–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2014.02.011 (2014).
Westre, T. E. et al. A Multiplet Analysis of Fe K-Edge 1s→3d Pre-Edge Features of Iron Complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 119, 6297–6314, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja964352a (1997).
Menard, M. C., Marschilok, A. C., Takeuchi, K. J. & Takeuchi, E. S. Variation in the iron oxidation states of magnetite nanocrystals as a function of crystallite size: The impact on electrochemical capacity. Electrochimica Acta 94, 320–326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.012 (2013).
Nilsen, M. H. et al. XAS (XANES and EXAFS) Investigations of Nanoparticulate Ferrites Synthesized Continuously in Near Critical and Supercritical Water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111, 6252–6262, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0626723 (2007).
Georgakilas, V., Perman, J. A., Tucek, J. & Zboril, R. Broad Family of Carbon Nanoallotropes: Classification, Chemistry, and Applications of Fullerenes, Carbon Dots, Nanotubes, Graphene, Nanodiamonds, and Combined Superstructures. Chemical Reviews 115, 4744–4822, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500304f (2015).
Kudin, K. N. et al. Raman Spectra of Graphite Oxide and Functionalized Graphene Sheets. Nano Letters 8, 36–41, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl071822y (2008).
Kaniyoor, A. & Ramaprabhu, S. A Raman spectroscopic investigation of graphite oxide derived graphene. AIP Advances 2, 032183, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4756995 (2012).
Ferrari, A. C. & Basko, D. M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat Nano 8, 235–246, http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v8/n4/abs/nnano.2013.46.html#supplementary-information (2013).
Johra, F. T., Lee, J.-W. & Jung, W.-G. Facile and safe graphene preparation on solution based platform. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 20, 2883–2887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.022 (2014).
Grimm, S., Schweiger, M., Eigler, S. & Zaumseil, J. High-Quality Reduced Graphene Oxide by CVD-Assisted Annealing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 3036–3041, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11598 (2016).
Wu, J. et al. Counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemical Society Reviews 46, 5975–6023, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00752j (2017).
Thomas, S. et al. A review on counter electrode materials in dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 4474–4490, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13374e (2014).
Xu, C. et al. Synthesis of hemin functionalized graphene and its application as a counter electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Chemistry and Physics 132, 858–864, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.025 (2012).
Cruz, R., Pacheco Tanaka, D. A. & Mendes, A. Reduced graphene oxide films as transparent counter-electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy 86, 716–724, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.11.010 (2012).
Zheng, H., Neo, C. Y., Mei, X., Qiu, J. & Ouyang, J. Reduced graphene oxide films fabricated by gel coating and their application as platinum-free counter electrodes of highly efficient iodide/triiodide dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry 22, 14465–14474, https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm30612c (2012).
Sarker, S., Lee, K.-S., Seo, H. W., Jin, Y.-K. & Kim, D. M. Reduced graphene oxide for Pt-free counter electrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy 158, 42–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.029 (2017).
Liu, W. et al. Two-Step Electrochemical Synthesis of Polypyrrole/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites as Efficient Pt-Free Counter Electrode for Plastic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6, 16249–16256, https://doi.org/10.1021/am5044483 (2014).
Kotz, J., Treichel, P. & Townsend, J. Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity (Cengage Learning 2008).
Yuan, W. et al. The edge- and basal-plane-specific electrochemistry of a single-layer graphene sheet. Scientific Reports 3, 2248, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02248 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep02248#supplementary-information (2013).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST), the Research Network NANOTEC (RNN) program of the National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology and Khon Kaen University, Thailand, the Thailand Center of Excellence in Physics (ThEP), the Research and Technology Transfer Affairs (KKUS60_003) and the National Research Council of Thailand (6100050), and Srinakharinwirot University (Grant #104/2561).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.H. wrote the main manuscript text and conceived the experiments, S.C. conducted the experiment, C.S. conducted and analysed the XANES experiment, V.H., S.P. and V.A. analysed the results, and P.S. prepared Fig. 5 and GO structure in Fig. 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Harnchana, V., Chaiyachad, S., Pimanpang, S. et al. Hierarchical Fe3O4-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite grown on NaCl crystals for triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci Rep 9, 1494 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38050-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38050-z
This article is cited by
-
Adsorption of uranium ions from aqueous solutions by graphene-based zinc oxide nanocomposites
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2023)
-
Investigation of structural, morphology, and conduction mechanism of GO–Fe3O4–TiO2 composite material
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2023)
-
Multifunctional modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for diagnosis and treatment of diseases: A review
Frontiers of Materials Science (2021)
-
Enhancement of photocatalytic potential and recoverability of Fe3O4 nanoparticles by decorating over monoclinic zirconia
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering (2020)
-
WN/nitrogen-doped reduced graphite oxide hybrids for triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells
Research on Chemical Intermediates (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.