Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Discovery of the World’s Smallest Terrestrial Pteridophyte


Ophioglossum L. commonly known as “adder’s tongue fern”, has been of great interest due to the highest number of chromosomes in any organism so far known in biological world. Here, a new species of adder’s tongue fern has been discovered and reported from Western Ghats of India. It is prominently distinct from the other known taxa in Ophioglossaceae family. Phylogenetic analysis of three chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions (trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH) unambiguously designate this adder’s tongue fern as the distinct lineage and is sister to the clade containing O. parvifolium and O. nudicaule. Azolla caroliniana – an aquatic fern (average size, 0.51.5 cm), is the smallest fern on the earth. Our discovery discloses a new species of adder’s tongue fern and ranking it among the smallest terrestrial fern in the world, attaining an average size of only 1–1.2 cm.


The Linnaean genus Ophioglossum, species of which are commonly known as “adder’s tongue fern” - owing to the shape of the spike, is the worldwide genus of eusporangiate fern family Ophioglossaceae of order Ophioglossales. Adder’s tongue ferns are too well recognized to cytologist and evolutionary ecologists for their small size with the highest chromosome number (O. reticulatum L. with 2n = 1440) in any organism so far known in biological world1. Historically, species concept in Ophioglossum is greatly misunderstood due to the simple morphology of the genus, which results in the lack of morphological characters upon which species are separated from each other2. Instead of lacking morphological characters, Ophioglossum species shows plenty of variation due to the higher number of chromosomes due to polyploidy and therefore several biotypes (morphological variants) are reported which also posed a number of problems for taxonomists3,4. However, species demarcation in Ophioglossum has been challenging, with the reported number of ~46 of species5,6,7,8,9,10. The prevailing problems on the genus taxonomy necessitate the genus revision with detailed morphological, palynological and by molecular methods. Genus revision is needed, because earlier taxonomic identifications were based solely on morphology and not on palynological and molecular analysis.

In India, 14 species of Ophioglossum has been reported, of which majority of the species are reported from the Western Ghats regions, one of the diversity hotspot in India and worldwide11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Despite a rich species diversity, Western Ghats is still under-explored region in terms of botanicals with continous sighting and findings of new species, even genera of the pteridophytes and angiosperms21,22,23,24.

During a botanical expedition of Ahwa forest area, Dang District, Gujarat (Western Ghats region), India we found few unusual small size of Ophioglossum species with very short spike, fairly close to Ophioglossum parvifolium Grev. & Hook. in general morphology but differing from it and other small size Ophioglossum species in several important characters. From morphological and spore structure comparison, we determined that the collected specimen is well-distinguished from other related small size Ophioglossum taxa. However, molecular phylogenetics study of three chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions (trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH) unambiguously designate this adder’s tongue fern as the distinct lineage and supported the position of the taxon as a new species. Furthermore, we representing the new collected Ophioglossum species as the world’s smallest terrestrial pteridophyte which is very minute in size, only 1–1.2 cm in comparision to an aquatic fern Azolla caroliniana (average size, 0.51.5 cm)25,26,27.



Ophioglossum malviae

Mitesh Patel & Mandadi Narsimha Reddy sp. nov. (Figs 1 and 2).

Figure 1

O. malviae sp. nov. (A,B and D) Entire plant (C). Tropophyll size, shape and venation.

Figure 2

Spore structure of O. malviae sp. nov. (A). Spores – dorsal, ventral views in light microscopy (B). Spore has triradiate mark in light microscopy (C). Four layers of spore 1). Perine, 2). Ectexine 3). Endexine and 4). Intine in light microscopy (D). SEM image of whole spore from dorsal side covering with perine layer (E). Spore with triradiate mark in fluorescence microscopy (F). SEM image of spore from ventral side.


Blatter Herbarium in St. Xavier’s College, Mumbai, India (BLAT 112082!).

Type locality

Jakhana village (20°37′36.79′′N, 73°44′31.47′′E, altitude ~471 m), Dang district, Gujarat, Western Ghats, India.


This species is named after a lady Malvi Surti who inspire the first author for pursuing research in this field.


O. malviae sp. nov. is unique among species of this genus by its very small size and spike, spores with outer perine layer and unique type of stomata in which the marginal cells of lower epidermis form dome like papillae.


Whole plant is minuscule, 1–1.2 cm in height; rhizome small, subglobose, tuberous, brown in colour, 0.4–0.6 cm in length, 0.2–0.3 cm in diameter; few 1–3 cm long brownish white (7–8 in numbers) roots emerges from the mid part of the rhizome; common stalk subterranean, 0.3–0.6 cm long, white in colour (Fig. 1A); rhizome bears trophophyll in set at its apex, parallel or marginally upward from the ground; trophophyll minute, 0.6–0.8 cm long, 0.4–0.6 cm wide, ovate to obovate in shape, obtuse at apex, cuneate at base, margin entire, thick and fleshy in texture, without midrib, yellowish green in shading (Fig. 1C); fertile spike inserted on adaxial side of trophophyll under trophophyll lamina, slightly yellowish green when young but brown on dry, 0.4–0.6 cm long; fertile apex very short, 0.2–0.4 cm long, 0.1 cm wide, ending with minute sterile tip; sporangia small, yellow, oppositely arranged, 4–8 in number on either side. Spores under light microscope (LM) are trilete tetrahedral type, globose, small in size (32–40 µm); presence of triradiate mark (laesurae) in the middle which is not extending up to the margins (Fig. 2A,B). In scanning electron microscope (SEM), laesural arms are crassimarginate, less wavy and jointed up to the middle of the proximal cavity (Fig. 2F). Spores are covered with four layers; outer spore wall layer forms a distinct separated layer that may appear as a loose sack is known as perispore layer (perine) (Fig. 2D); below the perispore layer, thick, reticulate ectexine and endexine layers are present; below exospore layer, inner most endospore layer is present (intine) (Fig. 2C). The distal face is granulose to verrucate in LM but in SEM the depressed aeroles are united in to negative reticulation. In the distal face, sculpture is coarsely microrugulate-microreticulate.

Reproductive period


Distribution and ecology

India – Gujarat state, Dang district, Jakhana village. The species grows in grassy area along with mosses on the grasslands of Jakhana village at an altitude of ~471 m, located in Ahwa forest division.

Conservation status

Currently, about 12 plants of O. malviae sp. nov. were found in the type locality. However, this area is poorly explored for the Pteridophytes diversity. Therefore, an assumption that the other population might be distributed around this area and more further explorations are needed to determine its full range distribution, the species should be considered as data deficient for now.

Species recognition

O. malviae sp. nov. is unique among species of this genus by its very small size with very different spore structure and unique stomata. Vegetatively, O. malviae sp. nov. is fairly close to O. parvifolium in such features as thick trophophyll with entire margin and obscure venation which are parallel or marginally upward from the ground. However, O. parvifolium differs from O. malviae sp. nov. by its larger size (up to 10 cm), slender underground rhizome giving rise to thin, fleshy roots which often bud adventitiously to form new plants, in numbers of trophophylls (one or two) with elliptic or ovate-elliptical shape, very fine fertile stalk up to 4 cm long, strobilli up to 1 cm long consisting up to 8–16 sporangia28. Furthermore, trophophyll apex of O. parvifolium is acute to apiculate and base is cordate whereas, apex is obtuse and base is cuneate in O. malviae sp. nov. Common stalk is subterranean in both species although white and short in O. malviae sp. nov. whereas white at base and pale green at above in O. parvifolium. Spore structure of O. parvifolium is completely different from the spores of O. malviae sp. nov. as a major difference is the presence of an outer thick layer (perine) in spores of O. malviae (Fig. 2D) which is absent in spores of O. parvifolium. In contrast, the spores of O. parvifolium showed thickened and moderately broad wavy laesural arms in the centre of proximal cavity, that become slightly raised and extending approximately to the equator (Fig. 3E). In the distal face, O. parvifolium spores have flat and wider areas (Fig. 3D), whereas O. malviae sp. nov. spores have deeper webbed mesh with pentagonal depressions (Fig. 3A). Moreover, both species are different in epidermal mesh alignment under SEM analysis of surface of dried trophophyll. O. malviae sp. nov. showing epidermal mesh aggregations to form ridges and furrows (Fig. 3C) whereas O. parvifolium showing broken interwoven undulating epidermal mesh forming cover areas. However, in the trophophyll of O. malviae sp. nov., distinct types of stomata are present in which the marginal cells of lower epidermis form dome like papillae (Fig. 3C,F). As of now, such type of stomata were observed only in one species of family Ophioglossaceae, which is Helminthostachys zeylanica1,29,30,31,32. In this regard, the new species O. malviae sp. nov. is unique among its congeners having such dome shape stomata.

Figure 3

Comparision of spore structure under SEM. (A) O. malviae sp. nov. distal face (B). O. malviae sp. nov. proximal face (C). SEM analysis of surface of dried trophophyll O. malviae sp. nov. with distribution of distinct types of stomata (D). O. parvifolium distal face (E). O. parvifolium proximal face (F). Enlargement of stomata showing dome like papillae.

However, our molecular results of trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH sequence data support the status of O. malviae sp. nov. as a distinct species. It clearly and precisely indicates that it forms a sister clade (92% BS, 0.97 BPP) with a clade containing O. parvifolium and O. nudicaule (Fig. 4).

Figure 4

Phylogeny of Ophioglossum species based on concatenated rbcL, trnL-F, and psbA-trnH data by using maximum likelihood analysis. ML bootstrap percentages (BP) are above branches and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) are below the branches.

Phylogenetic relationships and genetic divergence

Significant sequence variances between O. malviae sp. nov. and other congeneric species were seen, ranging from 1.5% to 36.0% for psbA-trnH, 13.3% to 64.5% for trnL-F, and 56.7% to 59.6% for rbcL. Based on the molecular phylogenetics analysis, it is established that O. malviae sp. nov. is falls within the genus Ophioglossum. The concatenated alignment of three chloroplast genes (trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH) contained 49 terminal dataset with 3325 characters. 21 likelihood trees of 2468 steps (consistency index, CI = 0.56, RI = 0.68) were generated by ML heuristic analysis. Topological comparison of ML and Bayseian are almost similar but they differ in ML bootstrap value and posterior probability number. O. malviae sp. nov. represent a distinct lineage and is sister to the clade containing O. parvifolium and O. nudicaule (Fig. 4).


Members of Ophioglossum are well known not only to possess large amount of DNA, more than of most evolved angiosperms but some of its species display the extremes33,34,35. Species concept in Ophioglossum is greatly misunderstood historically and has posed numerous complications for taxonomists due to the lack of morphometric characters upon which species are defined. Since, high likelihood of homoplasy is tricky and difficult in the genus Ophioglossum, morphology based species reports are known to be problematic36. Moreover, simple morphology and small size of Ophioglossum species poses challenges in identifying them from their related species. In the present study, a new species in the genus Ophioglossum has been identified and differentiated from all other known species using morphological, palynological and molecular methods. High degree of phenotypic distinct lineage and genetic divergence from the clade containing O. parvifolium and O. nudicaule, we described a new species (O. malviae) to which we have designated it as the smallest terrestrial pteridophyte of the world.

In ecology and evolutionary biology research, the most imperative element in the advancement and improvement of biodiversity management strategies is species delimitation. However, in many plant groups, studies on species diversity is still poorly acknowledged, especially for those areas having exceptionally huge biodiversity and aboriginal such as Western Ghats of India.

The new species, O. malviae sp. nov. is reported from the Western Ghats of India which is home of more than 320 species of pteridophytes apart from Himalayas in the country37. The diversity of Pteridophytes of India appears to be well documented. However, many new species of Pteridophytes have been described from the country in recent years38,39,40, which highlight the need for more dedicated surveys across the country, specially in the less explored regions. Systematics & taxonomy of Indian Pteridophytes remains largely unattended and is in need of revision after incorporating detailed morphological, palynological as well as molecular data which will inevitably result in many more discoveries like this.


Morphological observations

New plant specimens were collected from the Jakhana village (20°37′36.79′′N, 73°44′31.47′′E) of Dang District, Gujarat, India during August–September, 2016. Photographs of the plant specimens were taken from the field showing their habitat. Plant specimens were collected and transferred to the laboratory for morphological as well as microscopic analysis and for herbarium preparation at Bapalal Vaidhya Botanical Research Centre (BVBRC), Gujarat, India. The study was based on examination and comparisons of specimens collected mainly from the Western Ghats regions and Central Gujarat regions of India, herbarium specimens including type collections from BLAT as well as high resolution images from SRGH (Image No: 14642, 14307, 11416, 14934, 14942, 14932, 15210, 16494, 15235, 15332), LD, US, BNRH, NYBG, K, MICH, PH, US, SGO, LINN, P, BISH, GH, F and SI, comparisons with other Ophioglossum species with the help of available literature and by taking guidance of the experts in the field. Spores characters were examined & photographed by using light microscope (Axioscope A1, ZEISS, Germany) and by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) at Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre for Applied Research & Testing (SICART), Vallabh Vidhyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

DNA region sampling

25 Ophioglossum species sequences (24 sequences of rbcL gene, 13 sequences of trnL-F gene and 10 sequences of psbA-trnH gene) were downloaded from GeneBank in FASTA format. Downloaded sequences of all available Ophioglossum species were supplemented with the newly generated sequences of O. parvifolium and O. malviae sp. nov. Botrychium lunaria of the same family was used as outgroup taxa.

Isolation, amplification and sequencing of DNA

Sterilized collected plant material was used to extract the genomic DNA by modified method of Doyle and Doyle41. Quantification of isolated genomic DNA was done by the method of Sambrook et al.42. Purity of isolated genomic DNA was further assessed by electrophoresis in agarose gel (0.8%). Amplification was carried out by using extracted genomic DNA as template with three chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions (trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH)43,44,45. All three chloroplast regions (rbcL, trnL-F, and psbA-trnH) were amplified via using a single protocol. 20 μL reaction mixture contained isolated genomic DNA template (2 μL) (1:10 dilution of the extracted DNA), forward primer (1 μL), reverse primer (1 μL), 1× final concentration of ReadyMix™ Taq PCR reaction mix (Sigma) (10 μL) and nuclease free water (6 μL). The reaction was carried out in Thermal cycler (Applied BiosystemsVeriti®). PCR program was adjusted as: 94 °C for 4 minutes, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 seconds, 50 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 1.30 minutes, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 minutes and stored at −4 °C for ∞ time. Amplified chloroplast regions (trnL-F, rbcL and psbA-trnH) were detected via agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose gel) under UV light by staining with ethidium bromide. Amplified PCR products were purified using GenElute™ PCR Clean-up kit and sequenced at Eurrofins Genomics India Pvt Ltd., Bangalore.

Alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Sequences of all three chloroplast genes were analyzed in BioEdit 7.2.5. To find out the common regions among all retrieved Ophioglossum species sequences, pairwise alignment and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was carried out by using Clustal-W embedded in MEGA 7.0. with default settings. To evaluate congruence between different DNA regions, we analyzed each dataset (rbcL, psbA-trnH and trnL-F) separately to see if there is a similer topology. Incongruence Length Difference (ILD) test was also performed in PAUP* ver.4.0.a159 with 1000 replication of heuristic search46. Lower ILD value suggesting us to analysed three dataset in combination. Separate and combined molecular phylogenetic analyses were performed using Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods.

To assess best fit model of phylogenetics analyses, jModeltest ver. 2.0 was used with the implemention of Akaike Information Criterion47. GTR + G model was set up as the best fit for psbA-trnH and trnL-F regions whereas GTR + I + G for rbcL regions. ML analyses were conducted in PAUP* ver.4.0.a159 with GTR + I + G model of nucleotide substitution using heuristic analysis of 1,000 random taxon addition using TBR (tree bisection-reconnection) branch swapping48. To evaluate internal node support, Bootstrap analyses (BS) were calculated by 1000 stepwise addition replicates with TBR branch swapping49. Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic analyses was performed in MrBayes v.3.1.250 and was run for independent MCMC analyses for two parallel searches from random starting trees for 5 million generations. At every thousand generations, trees were sampled. The analysis reached at a standard split frequency <0.005, and the analysis was not continued further. Twenty five percent of trees generated were discarded as burn-in and the post-burn-in samples were used as 50% majority rule consensus tree. Sequence divergence uncorrected “p-distance” was calculated by using MEGA 7.051.

Data availability

All the generated sequences have been submitted in GenBank with accession number as MF184998, MG875321, MG875322, MG875323, MG875324, MG875325, MG875326.


  1. 1.

    Goswami, H. K., Verma, S. C. & Sharma B. D. Bionature Monograph on Biology of Pteridophytes. I Ophioglossum L. 1–135 (Jharkhand-India: Catholic Press Ranchi 2008).

  2. 2.

    Burrows, J. E. & Jones, R. J. Ophioglossaceae. (eds Beentie, H. J.), Flora of Tropical EastAfrica: Ophioglossaceae, 1–19 (2001).

  3. 3.

    Goswami, H. K. Biology of Ophioglossum L. Bionature 27, 1–73 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Peruzzi et al. Three new hybrids of Ophioglossum (Ophioglossaceae) from Monte Pisano, Tuscany (Central Italy). Plant Biosyst. 149, 737–746 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sermolli, P. R. E. The higher taxa of the Pteridophyta and their classification. (eds Hedberg, O.) 70–90 (Systematics of Today, Uppsala University Arsskrift, 1958).

  6. 6.

    Panigrahi, G. & Dixit, R. D. Studies in Indian Pteridophytes, 2 - The family Osmundaceae in India. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 48, 90–101 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Singh et al. Studies on the genus Ophioglossum L. in Pachmari Biosphere Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Taiwania 54, 353–364 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yadav, B. L. & Goswami, H. K. A New, Pink-brown Ophioglossum (Ophioglossaceae) from India. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Ser. B. 36, 155–159 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. The pteridophytes of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. 88, 1–1055 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Torres, E. I. M., Macluf, C. C., Morbelli, A. A. & Ferrucci, M. S. The circumscription of problematic species of Ophioglossum (Ophioglossaceae) from Southern South America – A palynological approach. Phytotaxa 205, 145–156 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Clausen, R. T. A monograph of the Ophioglossaceae. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 19, 1–177 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Khandelwal, S. New species of Ophioglossum L. from India. Indian Fern J. 3, 89–94 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Khandelwal, S. Chemosystematics of Indian Ophioglossumspores. Indian Fern J. 3, 89–94 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Khandelwal, S. & Goswami, H. K. A new Ophioglossum from India. Fern Gaz. 12, 330 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vasudeva, S. M. & Bir, S. S. Pteridophytic flora of Pachmarhi Hills (Central India-II) Key to different taxa and fern families Ophioglossaceae-Davalliaceae. Indian Fern J. 10, 40–72 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yadav, B. L. & Tripathi, M. K. Ophioglossum Linn. in Rajasthan–Taxonomy and Distribution. (eds Trivedi, P. C.), 248–267 (Advances in Pteridology, Pointer Publisher, Jaipur, 2002).

  17. 17.

    Goswami, H. K. Recurrent variations in natural populations may indicate genomic involvements I. Ophioglossum L. and Psilotum nudum (L.) (eds Verma, S. C.), 445–456 (Perspectives in Pteridophytes, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, 2008).

  18. 18.

    Anto, P. V., Khan, A., Francis, F. & Antony, I. Ophioglossum raphaelianum (Ophioglossaceae) – A new species from South India. Int. J Adv. Res. 4, 1268–1273 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Patil, S., Lavate, R. & Dongare, M. New Distributional Record of two species of Ophioglossum L. for the Deccan Peninsula, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 111, 156–157 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kachhiyapatel, R. N., Singh, A. P., Raole, V. M. & Rajput, K. S. Distribution and occurrence of some Pteridophytes In Gujarat: A New Record For The State. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 94, 236–244 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hameed, A. & Madhusoodanan, P. V. Trichomanes vamana, a new filmy fern species (Hymenophyllaceae - Pteridophyta) from India. Nord. J. Bot. 23, 437–439 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kiran Raj, M. S., Sivadasa, M., Veldkamp, J. F., Alfarhan, A. H. & Thomas, J. Nanooravia gen. nov., subtribe Dimeriinae (Poaceae – Panicoideae – Andropogoneae) from India. Nord. J. Bot. 31, 161–165 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rajkumar, G. P., Alister, M., Nazarudeen, A. & Pandurangan, A. G. Miliusa sahyadrica, a new species of Annonaceae from the Western Ghats, India. Phytotaxa 284, 211–217 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Manudev, K. M., Robi, A. J. & Nampy, S. Impatiens stolonifera (Balsaminaceae): A new scapigerous species from the southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Phytotaxa 295, 71–76 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shi, J. & Hall, D. O. The Azolla – Anabaena Association: Historical Perspective, Symbiosis and energy Metabolism. Bot. Rev. 54, 353–386 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sanders, R. M. K. & Fowler, K. The supraspecific taxonomy and evolution of the fern genus Azolla (Azollaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 184, 175–193 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wagner, G. M. Azolla: a review of its biology and utilization. Bot. Rev. 63, 1–26 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fraser-Jenkins, C. R., Kandel, D. R. & Pariyar, S. Ferns and Fern-Allies of Nepal–I. 100–101 (National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories, Department of Plant Resources, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2015).

  29. 29.

    Mahabale, T. S. Species of Ophioglossum in India. Their taxonomy and phylogeny. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 4, 71–84 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Inamdar, J. A. Development of stomata in some Ophioglossum species. Ann. Bot. 34, 975–981 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pant, D. D. & Khare, P. K. Notes on the spore morphology of Ophioglossaceae and the occurrence of Ophioglossum and its gametophytes in the Gangetic Valley. Geophytology 1, 48–53 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khandelwal, S. & Goswami, H. K. Stomata in Ophioglossum palmatum L. Curr. Sci. 45, 62–63 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Khandelwal, S. Chromosome evolution in the genus Ophioglossum L. Bot J Linn Soc. 102, 205–217 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bedini, G., Garbari, F. & Peruzzi, L. Karyological knowledge of Italian vascular flora as inferred by the analysis of “Chrobase. it”. Plant Biosyst 146, 889–899 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ruffini, C. M. & Cremonini, R. A fascinating island: 2n¼4. Plant Biosyst. 146, 711–726 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Burrows, J. E. The use of spore morphology as a taxonomic tool in the delimitation of the southern Africa species of Ophioglossum L. (Ophioglossaceae: Pteridophyta). Holttum Memorial Volume. (eds Johns, R. J.) 43–65 (Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, 1997).

  37. 37.

    Dudani, S., Chandran, S. M. D. & Ramachandra, T. V. Pteridophytes of Western Ghats. Biodiversity documentation and taxonomy. (eds Kumar, A. B) 343–351 (Narendra publishing House, 2012).

  38. 38.

    Kholia, B. S., Bhakuni, K. & Punetha, R. Aleuritopteris punethae (Pteridaceae) a new species of silver fern from Indian Himalaya. Telopea 12, 485–489 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dominic, R. S. A new Species of Pteris L. (Pteridaceae: Pteridophyta) from Western Ghats of South India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 102, 313–314 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shao, W. & Lu, S. G. Himalayopteris, a New Fern Genus from India and the Adjacent Himalayas (Polypodiaceae, Polypodioideae). Novon 21, 90–93 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11–15 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sambrook, J., Fritch, F. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory (Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1982).

  43. 43.

    Levin et al. Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Am. J. Bot. 90, 107–115 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17, 1105–1109 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One. 2, e508 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Farris, J. S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A. G. & Bult, C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315–319 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Swofford, D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony Version 4.0a159. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts (2002).

  49. 49.

    Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39, 783–791 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tamura, K. & Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512–526 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by a National Fellowship for Students of OBC, (NFO-2015-17-OBC-GUJ-29274) from University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India. We would like to thank Dr. Minoo Parabia, Dr. A. Bennamin and Dr. Anto P.V. for their guidance and support. We are thankful to Forest Department of Gujarat issued the necessary research permits. We are also thankful to Harshil Patel and Zeeshan Mirza for support and guidance in phylogenetics analysis. Chirag Prajapati, Kartik Patel, Nirmal Patel, Kishan Lad, Viral Chaudhary, Vyomal Chaudhary are thanked for their support and encouragement.

Author information




Conceived and designing of the experiments: M. Patel; Experiments Performed: M. Patel; Data Analysis: M.N. Reddy; Manuscript Writing: M. Patel; Figures and Tables Preparation: M. Patel; Review & Editing: M.N. Reddy; Both authors participated in discussion of the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitesh Patel.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, M., Reddy, M.N. Discovery of the World’s Smallest Terrestrial Pteridophyte. Sci Rep 8, 5911 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing