In silico screening for human norovirus antivirals reveals a novel non-nucleoside inhibitor of the viral polymerase


Human norovirus causes approximately 219,000 deaths annually, yet there are currently no antivirals available. A virtual screening of commercially available drug-like compounds (~300,000) was performed on the suramin and PPNDS binding-sites of the norovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Selected compounds (n = 62) were examined for inhibition of norovirus RdRp activity using an in vitro transcription assay. Eight candidates demonstrated RdRp inhibition (>25% inhibition at 10 µM), which was confirmed using a gel-shift RdRp assay for two of them. The two molecules were identified as initial hits and selected for structure-activity relationship studies, which resulted in the synthesis of novel compounds that were examined for inhibitory activity. Five compounds inhibited human norovirus RdRp activity (>50% at 10 µM), with the best candidate, 54, demonstrating an IC50 of 5.6 µM against the RdRp and a CC50 of 62.8 µM. Combinational treatment of 54 and the known RdRp site-B inhibitor PPNDS revealed antagonism, indicating that 54 binds in the same binding pocket. Two RdRps with mutations (Q414A and R419A) previously shown to be critical for the binding of site-B compounds had no effect on inhibition, suggesting 54 interacts with distinct site-B residues. This study revealed the novel scaffold 54 for further development as a norovirus antiviral.


Human norovirus is responsible for over 200,000 global deaths, USD $60 billion in societal costs, and USD $4.2 billion in health expenditure each year1. While norovirus-induced illness is usually self-limiting in healthy individuals, the disease can be severe or life threatening in immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients2,3, neonates4, young children5,6 and elderly populations7,8. As such, a significant research effort has been invested to identify antiviral candidates for the treatment of norovirus infections and for prophylactic use in outbreak settings.

Several factors have hampered norovirus antiviral research, including the inability to successfully propagate human norovirus in cell culture until recently9,10. However, the recently developed human norovirus culture systems are not readily amenable to antiviral screening due to low replication levels, with only 100- to 1000-fold increases in viral titres9,10, and the systems’ complexities and costs. Most norovirus antiviral research currently relies on the closely related murine norovirus (MNV), for screening potential human antivirals due to its robust and reliable culture, and available mouse models11.

The only norovirus antiviral in clinical trials to-date is the broad-spectrum antimicrobial compound nitazoxanide12 (Fig. 1). This compound has successfully treated one immunosuppressed patient13, and reportedly reduced the duration of symptoms in both norovirus and rotavirus infected patients12. However, the exact mode of action of nitazoxanide against norovirus is still unknown, and more research is required to establish its antiviral target.

Figure 1

Norovirus inhibitors in pre-clinical studies. Nitazoxanide (1), 2′-C-methylcytidine (2), valopicitabine (3), PPNDS (4), suramin (5).

There are a small number of human norovirus antiviral candidates in preclinical development. The majority of these therapeutic candidates target the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)14,15,16,17, or the viral protease18,19,20, due to their critical role in viral replication, and their lack of cellular homologues21,22. RdRp-targeted antivirals fall into two classes; nucleoside analogues (NAs) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNIs)23. NA prodrugs can be phosphorylated after cellular uptake, then incorporated into the growing viral nucleic acid chain by the RdRp24. These antivirals work by competing with incoming nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) to cause either chain termination25, or lethal mutagenesis of the progeny virus26. NAs have proven successful in the treatment of several viral infections including hepatitis B virus27, hepatitis C virus (HCV)28, herpesviruses29 and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)30. However, due to their mode of action, they frequently result in off-target side effects31,32, and no NAs have yet reached clinical trials for norovirus treatment. One NA, 2′-C-methylcytidine (2CMC) (Fig. 1), inhibited the human norovirus RdRp, with a reported half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 2.5 µM15, and a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 8.2 µM in cell culture against the human norovirus replicon15. More recently, 2CMC was also found to be effective against human norovirus cultured in the B-cell culture system, with a reported EC50 of 0.3 µM33. However, despite these promising preclinical results, development of the oral 2CMC prodrug (valopicitabine) (Fig. 1) for the treatment of HCV patients was terminated after gastrointestinal effects were reported, and further development against other viruses including human norovirus is now unlikely.

Unlike NAs, NNIs generally bind to allosteric pockets on the viral polymerase to prevent conformational changes necessary for transcription34. NNIs have been clinically approved for treating HIV35 and HCV36 infections, however, while several potential norovirus NNIs have been identified in pre-clinical studies14,16,17,37,38,39, none are in clinical trials for the treatment of human norovirus infections. Amongst these pre-clinical candidates is the anthelmintic drug suramin (Fig. 1), which demonstrated potent in vitro inhibitory activity against the human norovirus RdRp in enzymatic assays with an IC50 of 27.0 nM37. Similarly, the suramin derivative, pyridoxal-5′-phosphate-6-(2′-naphthylazo-6′-nitro-4′,8′-disulfonate) tetrasodium salt (PPNDS) (Fig. 1), has also been shown to inhibit human norovirus RdRp activity in vitro, with an IC50 of 0.45 µM17. Recently, PPNDS was reported to exhibit broad-spectrum antiviral activity against other calicivirus RdRps16. However, neither of these compounds are likely to be suitable for the treatment of human norovirus infections, as both suramin and PPNDS display poor cell membrane permeability17,40, suramin induces severe side-effects41,42, and PPNDS is known to have non-specific, off-target activity43.

The human norovirus polymerase forms the canonical ‘right-hand’ RdRp structure, with fingers, palm and thumb domains44. To-date, three NNI binding sites have been identified on the norovirus RdRp, including the NTP pathway, site-A in the fingers domain and site-B in the thumb domain17,37. Co-crystallisation studies of the norovirus RdRp and suramin identified its binding pocket in the NTP access pathway, between the fingers and thumb domains37. Site-A lies within a positively charged cleft for NTP traversal, but due to highly flexible amino acid side-chains it is less suitable as an NNI target, due to challenges for structure-based antiviral design17. However, site-B is a highly conserved binding site within the thumb region and can be exploited for both structure-activity and targeted de-novo antiviral design of novel compounds against human norovirus16.

This study aimed to identify promising chemical scaffolds for antiviral development targeting the human norovirus RdRp. To achieve this aim, a series of structure-based and ligand-based virtual screenings were carried out on approximately 300,000 commercially available compounds with favourable drug-like properties, to identify binding capabilities focused primarily on the suramin and PPNDS binding-sites of the norovirus RdRp. This in silico screening identified 62 compounds that were examined for inhibition of norovirus RdRp activity using polymerase assays. Two molecules were found to have an interesting RdRp inhibitory activity and were selected for a structure-activity relationship study synthesising new chemical derivatives. Among the newly prepared compounds, we identified a lead candidate site-B binder, which inhibited the human norovirus RdRp at a low micromolar concentration. This study revealed a novel NNI that presents a promising scaffold for further chemical enhancement, to improve potency and specificity, in the pursuit of effective norovirus antivirals.

Results and Discussion

Molecular Modelling: hit identification

Two different virtual screening approaches have been used for the initial selection of potential hit compounds: a structure-based virtual screening and a ligand-based virtual screening. While the first approach takes into consideration the protein structure and the ligand spatial disposition in relation to the active site (pharmacophore features), the ligand-based methodology compares the shapes of known ligands with unknown ones, evaluating two-dimensional similarities (i.e. same functional groups) or three-dimensional similarities (molecule occupational volume) without considering the protein structure45. The molecules selected with the two methods were then subjected to different molecular docking evaluations described below.

Structure-based virtual screening

The norovirus RdRp was used to perform a structure-based virtual screening of the SPECS library, a database of ~300,000 commercially available compounds46. In particular, two screens were conducted using two different RdRp crystal structures: the MNV RdRp co-crystallised with suramin (PDB ID: 3UR0, 62% identity with the human norovirus RdRp)37 and the human RdRp co-crystallised with PPNDS (PDB ID: 4LQ3)17. Suramin inhibits human norovirus and MNV RdRp activity through a mixed inhibition mode (nucleic acid and GTP) and occupies site-A. Site-A encompasses the access route for the incoming NTP that is linked to the nascent RNA chain. PPNDS inhibits human norovirus RdRp activity by blocking the access of both the ssRNA template and the NTPs, and occupies the inner pocket of site-B, which is located in the RdRp thumb domain17. The two binding sites are very close to each other and overlap in the central part of the protein structure.

The SPECS database of compounds was pre-filtered using a pharmacophore model based on the suramin binding site in one case and on the PPNDS binding site in the second case (Fig. 2A,B). The required structural features of the suramin pharmacophore were identified in 4838 structures, whereas 5206 matched the PPNDS model. These two sub-libraries were then docked using PLANTS software47 on the suramin and on the PPNDS binding sites, respectively. The docking results (docking poses) obtained for each binding site were subsequently re-scored using other two different docking programs: LeadIT-FlexX and Glide XP48,49. Applying an internal consensus score procedure, a methodology validated by our research group in the past50, the values of the three different scoring functions for each docking pose were analysed together. Only the docking poses falling in the top 25% of the score value range in all the three scoring functions were considered as hits. 799 compounds were selected for the suramin pocket, 755 for the PPNDS. A final selection was made by visually inspecting the docking poses of the different molecules and their potential binding to the target sites (see experimental section). 19 derivatives were selected for the suramin binding site and 20 for the PPNDS site. The molecules were purchased and screened for inhibition of norovirus RdRp activity using a transcription enzyme assay.

Figure 2

Pharmacophore models used for the structure-based virtual screening. (A) Model based on suramin binding to the MNV RdRp 3UR0 crystal structure. The model consists of three aromatic features (purple, green and turquoise), one hydrogen bond acceptor (pink) and two hydrogen bond acceptors or anionic groups (orange and yellow). Only the interacting portion of suramin has been considered for the pharmacophore creation. (B) Model based on PPNDS binding to the human norovirus RdRp 4LQ3 crystal structure. The model consists of two aromatic features (purple and green), three hydrogen bond acceptors and anionic groups (pink, turquoise and yellow) and one hydrogen bond donor and acceptor. Exclusion volumes are hidden for clarity. The two binding site areas are represented as molecular surface. The MNV RdRp structure is shown as dark green ribbon, while the human norovirus RdRp is represented as salmon ribbon.

Ligand-based virtual screening

A shape-based screening of the SPECS library, previously prepared with the Omega conformations generator program, was performed using ROCS 3D51. Two different queries were generated: one based on the partial structure of suramin, and a second prepared on the PPNDS structure (Fig. 3A,B). In both cases, the occupational volume of the two molecules was generated and the relevant chemical properties of each ligand were included as pharmacophore features. The two queries were used to pre-filter the SPECS database; 6563 molecules matched the shape and electrostatic features (Tanimoto combo score) of suramin, whereas 6571 resulted from the PPNDS query. Also in this screen, the two new sub-libraries were then docked using PLANTS software on the suramin and on the PPNDS binding sites respectively. After the consensus score procedure and a final visual inspection (see experimental section), three compounds were selected for suramin and 20 for PPNDS. The new derivatives were purchased and biologically evaluated.

Figure 3

Queries generated using vROCS. (A) Query generated using the partial structure of suramin. (B) Query generated using the structure of PPNDS. The overall molecular shape of both the inhibitors is represented as a grey surface, while the chemical features considered are an H-bond acceptor (red sphere) and hydrophobic/aromatic centres (green spheres).

Biological Evaluation

Two candidates inhibit norovirus RdRp activity

The 62 compounds identified in silico were screened for inhibition of norovirus RdRp activity using an in vitro fluorescent, de novo RdRp assay52. Compounds were tested at fixed concentrations of 10 µM and 100 µM, and compared to mock treated samples containing the vehicle only (0.5% DMSO [vol/vol]) (Fig. 4A,B). Of the 62 compounds examined, five (Fig. 4C) exhibited more than 25% inhibition of human norovirus RdRp activity at 10 µM (Fig. 4A) and more than 50% at 100 µM (Fig. 4B). For certain compounds, significant insolubility was observed, coupled with either inherent fluorescence quenching (positive y-axis values on Fig. 4A,B) or enhancement of the fluorescence signal (negative y-axis values). Therefore, a secondary assay that does not rely on relative fluorescence was employed as an effective counter-screen to exclude false positives and compounds that showed enhanced fluorescence.

Figure 4

Initial screen for inhibition of human norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity. The effects of 62 compounds were examined against norovirus RdRp activity using a fluorescent activity assay at 10 µM (A) and 100 µM (B). Five compounds that exhibited more than 25% inhibition at 10 µM and 50% inhibition at 100 µM (red bars) and three soluble compounds that exhibited more than 25% inhibition at both concentrations (green bars) were chosen for further assessment with a counter-screen gel-shift RdRp assay. The positive control (blue bars) is a previously reported norovirus NNI RdRp inhibitor NIC02 (10 µM in (A) and 100 µM in (B)14. The mean values of triplicate datasets with standard deviation are shown. (C) Structure of the eight most potent compounds with 11 and 13 highlighted. (D) A counter-screen gel-shift assay was used to confirm norovirus RdRp inhibitory activity of hit compounds. The eight compounds were examined for inhibition of primed elongation activity. PE44-NoV RNA templates (32 nucleotides) were extended (44 nucleotides) by the RdRp in the absence of any test compounds (0.5% DMSO [vol/vol] negative control) or with test compounds at a fixed concentration of 100 µM. The nucleoside analogue 3′-deoxyguanosine-5′-triphosphate is used as a positive control (10 µM) to demonstrate complete inhibition, and no RdRp was used as a negative control. Full-length gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. S2.

In addition, some compounds (i.e. AJ-077/33270018 and AP-970/12851847) exhibited insolubility, innate fluorescence and even apparent RdRp enhancement at 100 µM (negative y-axis values Fig. 4B). Therefore, they were counter-screened at 100 µM in a secondary gel-based assay (Supplementary Fig. S1). The putative RdRp activity enhancement observed in the primary fluorescent assay was not seen in the gel-based assay, confirming compound insolubility and innate fluorescence that was likely affecting assay results.

To confirm RdRp inhibition and to exclude any potential false positives from the first fluorescence RdRp assay, the eight selected compounds (Fig. 4C) were then assessed using a gel-shift enzyme activity assay. These eight compounds included five that demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition (red bars, compounds 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13) reaching over 25% inhibition at 10 µM and more than 50% inhibition at 100 µM. Three additional compounds (compounds 8, 10 and 12) that reached more than 25% inhibition at both 10 and 100 µM were selected for counter-screening. The three compounds (green bars) were examined using the gel-based assay due to the unusual behaviour of demonstrating higher inhibition at 10 µM compared to 100 µM, potentially due to solubility issues. Two additional compounds (AE-562/12222591 and AK-968/41925073) demonstrated more than 25% inhibition at 10 and 100 µM but were not pursued further as they both precipitated heavily in 100% DMSO and therefore lacked the desirable drug-like property of solubility.

In this assay, a 32 nucleotide RNA template (PE44-NoV) is extended to 44 nucleotides in the presence of an active RdRp16. The NA 3′-deoxyguanosine-5′-triphosphate (3′dGTP) was used as a positive control and exhibited complete inhibition of transcription at 10 µM. Inhibition of primed elongation of the PE44-NoV template was examined at a fixed concentration of 100 µM (Fig. 4D). In the absence of inhibition (0.5% DMSO vehicle only) the RNA template was extended to 44 nucleotides (Fig. 4D), evidenced by an upward gel shift and the appearance of the second, higher band. Only two of the eight compounds, 11 and 13, exhibited complete inhibition of norovirus RdRp activity at 100 µM (Fig. 4D), while the remaining six compounds (6–10 and 12) only demonstrated partial inhibition of primed elongation activity, and were excluded from further development. Based on these results, we decided to focus our attention on these two molecules.


Due to their confirmed inhibitory activity against the RdRp polymerases, the structures of 11 and 13 were chosen as starting point for the preparation of a series of analogues, with which to explore the structure-activity relationships associated with the two scaffolds.

Hit 13 modified analogues

13 is characterized by a methylbenzoic acid portion and a morpholine ring part linked by a central furan-2-yl-methylene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione core. We focused our initial synthetic efforts on the two lateral portions of the molecule, without modifying the central core, in order to investigate the role of these two parts in the RdRp inhibitory activity.

The synthetic pathway reported in Fig. 5 was obtained after several optimizations of reaction methods and routes. The differently substituted phenylfuran-2-carbaldehydes 16a–d were prepared by reacting the corresponding phenylboronic acids (14a–d) with 5-bromofuran-2-carbaldehyde (15) in a mix of tetrahydrofuran/water, through a Suzuki coupling reaction using sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) as base and tetrakis (Pd[Ph]3]4) as catalyst modifying a reported procedure53. The desired products were obtained in a very good yield range (62–98%) after flash column chromatography purification. A Knoevenagel condensation was exploited for the preparation of derivatives 18a–d by reacting compounds 16a–d with thiazolidine-2,4-dione (17), using β-alanine as catalyst and acetic acid as solvent53. In the final step, compounds 18a–d were converted into the corresponding final products 23a–c, 24a–d, 25a–d by reacting them with 20–22 in dimethylformamide (DMF) at 60 °C for 72 h using potassium carbonate (K2CO3) as base54. The final compounds were obtained in a good yield range (42–76%) after either re-crystallization or flash column chromatography purification. Compounds 20–22 were previously prepared by reacting 2-bromoacetyl chloride (19) with different secondary amines in dichloromethane (DCM) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) as base55. Synthetic efforts were made to achieve good yields for this step by monitoring the reaction temperature and evaluating different bases. Following this synthetic route, 11 derivatives of 13 were prepared.

Figure 5

General synthetic procedure followed for the preparation of 23a-c, 24a-d, 25a-d. (i) Na2CO3, Pd(PPh3)2, THF/H2O, r.t. 8 h, 60 °C 12 h; (ii) β-alanine, AcOH, 100 °C 1 h; (iii) K2CO3, DMF, r.t. o.n., 60 °C 72 h; (iv) secondary amine, DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C to r.t. 20 min.

As reported above, 13 presents a free acid group, therefore a basic hydrolysis of 23b with LiOH in water and methanol at room temperature was attempted. Unfortunately, NMR analysis revealed complete degradation of the starting material with the opening of the thiazolidinedione ring, revealing instability for these compounds in basic environments. A second attempt was made by performing an acid hydrolysis in HCl 6 M increasing the reaction temperature to 100 °C over 3 days. In this case, the desired hydrolysis did not take place and the starting ester was recovered.

In the attempt to find a strategy to prepare the free acid derivatives, the previously used synthetic pathway was slightly modified, as reported in Fig. 6, by performing the ester hydrolysis of 16b as second step after the Suzuki coupling, obtaining 26. Hydrolysed 26 was then condensed with 17 to give 27. In the last step, the reaction between 27 and 20 did not yield the desired product 28, the unreacted staring materials were recovered, along with small amounts of a minor by-product, 29, in which the substitution of the bromide compound occurred on the carboxylic acid portion of the molecule instead of the thiazolidinedione ring, as also reported by Zhang et al.56. The free acid seems to interfere with the SN2 reaction and a different approach was therefore investigated.

Figure 6

Alternative method for the preparation of the free acid derivative. (i) β-alanine, AcOH, 100 °C 1 h; (ii) K2CO3, DMF, r.t. o.n., 60 °C 72 h.

Figure 7 shows the planned modifications to the original synthetic pathway to prepare 28. In this case, the Knoevenagel condensation was performed as a first step giving 30. Nucleophilic substitution with 20 gave the central furan-2-yl-methylene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione core with the attached morpholine ring portion (31). For the last step, the Suzuki coupling between the 4-boronobenzoic acid 32, previously prepared starting from its ester derivative (14b), and 31 was attempted, but no desired product was obtained, recovering the unreacted boronic acid and observing degradation of the thiazolidinedione ring.

Figure 7

Alternative method for the preparation of the free acid derivatives (i) β-alanine, AcOH, 100 °C 1 h; (ii) K2CO3, DMF, r.t. o.n., 60 °C 72 h; (iii) Na2CO3, Pd(PPh3)2, THF/H2O, r.t. 8 h, 60 °C 12 h.

A final and alternative method for the preparation of the desired free acid 28 was developed, considering the target molecule as an assembly of two portions: the 4-(5-formylfuran-2-yl)benzoic acid (26), prepared by Suzuki coupling (Fig. 6), and the 3-(2-morpholino-2-oxoethyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (33), obtained by the SN2 reaction between 17 and 20. The two portions were then linked together in the last step through a Knoevenagel condensation affording the desired product 28 with the free acid (Fig. 8). This new approach was used for the preparation of other seven final compounds, including the original hit 13, that could be used as reference for the new biological evaluation (Fig. 9). Also for this synthetic pathway, the different steps were optimised to afford a high yield. In particular, for the preparation of the thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives (35–38), the reaction conditions needed to be changed according to the substituted amine present. In the case of piperidine and dimethylamine derivatives (36, 37), the use of sodium hydride (NaH) as base and THF as solvent gave a less impure reaction and a higher yield if compared to the method used for the other derivatives.

Figure 8

Preparation of the free acid derivative 28 (i) K2CO3, DMF, r.t. o.n., 60 °C 72 h; (ii) β-alanine, AcOH, 100 °C 1 h.

Figure 9

General synthetic procedure followed for the preparation of 13, 39d, 40e, 41e, 42a-c. (i) Na2CO3, Pd(PPh3)2, THF/H2O, r.t. 8 h, 60 °C 12 h; (ii) secondary amine, DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C to r.t. 20 min; (iii) K2CO3, DMF, r.t. o.n., 60 °C 72 h or NaH, THF, 60 °C, 24 h; (iv) β-alanine, AcOH, 100 °C 1 h.

Hit 11 modified analogues

11 has a central furan-2-ylmethylene-pyrazolidine-3,5-dione core substituted at position 1 of the pyrazolidine with a methyl benzene and at position 5 of the furane ring with a thiazol-2-yl-benzenesulfonamide. A five-step synthetic pathway was developed and optimised and a small family of two new derivatives was prepared in order to initially understand the role of the methyl group and the thiazole ring.

Hydrazides 46–47 were prepared by reacting the corresponding phenylhydrazines (43–44) with ethyl-3-chloro-3-oxopropanoate (45) in THF and triethylamine (Et3N), following a reported methodology57. 46–47 were then converted into the corresponding 1-phenylpyrazolidine-3,5-dione 48–49 through an ester displacement reaction in the presence of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and ethanol (EtOH)57. 4-Bromobenzene-1-sulfonyl chloride (50) and aniline 51 in pyridine gave sulfonamide 52, which was then converted in 53 by a Suzuki coupling. In particular, synthetic efforts were made to find the best conditions for this coupling, since the procedure previously described did not work and only the starting materials were recovered after each attempt, potentially due to an interference of the sulfonamide bond with the catalyst used. After changing solvent systems, reaction temperature, base and phosphine ligands, the best reaction conditions were found using potassium phosphate (K3PO4) as base, Pd(dppf) as catalyst, water/DMF as solvent and heating in a microwave reactor at 130 °C, which gave the desired product in a good yield (61%).

In the last step (Fig. 10), the two portions were linked together by reacting 48–49 and 53 according to a Knoevenagel condensation, giving the desired products 54 and 55.

Figure 10

General synthetic procedure followed for the preparation of 54, 55. (i) NEt3, THF, r.t. 3 h; (ii) NaOH, EtOH, r.t. 30 min; (iii) pyridine, r.t. o.n.; (iv) K3PO4, Pd(dppf), H2O/DMF, 130 °C 75 min (microwave); (v) AcOH, 120 °C 3 h.

Biological Evaluation

Three newly prepared compounds inhibit human norovirus RdRp activity

The newly synthesised compounds, including the re-prepared hit 13 and some synthesis intermediates (Table 1), were initially evaluated on norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity in vitro using a quantitative fluorescent assay. Compounds were tested at a fixed concentration of 10 μM and compared to the relative activity of mock treated samples.

Table 1 Newly prepared compounds evaluated on recombinant norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity in vitro assay. S.I. = synthesis intermediate; S.P. = side product.

Results of the assay are reported in Fig. 11A. The re-prepared 13 demonstrated a similar level of inhibition compared to the initial screening data (25% inhibition at 10 µM, cf. 37% inhibition at 10 µM for the commercial variant), further supporting the reproducibility of the assay and more importantly confirming the RdRp inhibitory activity associated with this particular molecule. The shorter phenylfuran-2-yl-(methylene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives (18a, 18c, 27), regardless of the substituent on the aromatic ring, and the furan-2-yl(methylene)-3-(morpholine-4-carbonyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (31) lacked RdRp inhibitory activity, indicating that RdRp inhibition was associated with the whole scaffold of 13 and not only with the methylbenzoic acid portion or the morpholine ring part. These derivatives are likely too small to entirely occupy the RdRp binding site area to block polymerase activity. The overall RdRp inhibitory activity of the derivatives of 13 seems to be the result of the combination of the two portions forming the molecule. In the morpholine derivatives, the most important influence for the activity was given by the free acid in position para of the aromatic ring. In fact, its removal (23a, 23c) or its conversion to a methyl ester (23b, 39d) lead to a complete loss of activity, whereas the derivative bearing only the free acid (28) showed improved activity when compared with the initial hit, inhibiting the RdRp activity by almost 50%. The methyl group at position ortho seems irrelevant for inhibitory activity, as demonstrated by the lack of activity of 23c, and its removal, together with the presence of the free acid, lead to a significant increment of inhibitory activity. In the piperidine compounds, an unsubstituted aromatic ring (24a) and an ortho methyl substituent (24c) are related with the loss of inhibitory activity, giving the same result obtained for the morpholine series. Replacement of the morpholine ring with piperidine (40e) in the original structure of 13 abolished the activity, whereas esterification of the same derivative (24d) resulted in 25% inhibition, similar to the initial hit. Removal of the ortho methyl group of 24d (24b) increased the degree of RdRp inhibitory activity up to 60%, compared with 13, confirming the detrimental effect of the ortho methyl group. Replacing the morpholine ring with a non-cyclic secondary amine, such as the dimethyl amine, slightly improved the activity compared to the initial hit, but a maximum of 45% inhibition at 10 µM was reached. Also in this case, the presence of the acid or the ester seems fundamental for activity retention (25a, 25c). Insertion of an aniline moiety, in replacement of the morpholine, had a positive impact on inhibitory activity, with derivative 42a, characterised by the unsubstituted aromatic ring on one side and the aniline on the other side, reaching 75% RdRp inhibition at 10 µM.

Figure 11

Secondary screen for inhibition of human norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity. (A) The inhibitory effects of 26 compounds were examined against norovirus RdRp activity using a fluorescent activity assay at 10 µM. Five compounds that exhibited more than 50% inhibition (red bars) were chosen for further assessment with a counter-screen gel-shift RdRp assay. The positive control (blue bar) is the norovirus NNI RdRp inhibitor NIC0214. The mean values of triplicate datasets with standard deviations are shown. (B) A counter-screen-gel-shift assay was used to confirm norovirus RdRp inhibitory activity of the five compounds identified in panel (A). PE44-NoV RNA templates (32 nucleotides) were extended (44 nucleotides) by the RdRp in the absence of any test compounds (0.5% DMSO [vol/vol] negative control) or with test compounds at a fixed concentration of 100 µM. The nucleoside analogue 3′-deoxyguanosine-5′-triphosphate (3′dGTP) was used as a positive control (10 µM) to demonstrate complete inhibition, and no RdRp was used as a negative control. Full-length gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. S3.

Hit 11 derivatives, in which the original thiazole ring has been replaced by an unsubstituted phenyl ring, showed 75% RdRp inhibition, with no substantial differences between the methyl benzene and the unsubstituted phenyl derivative (55 vs. 54), and an activity comparable with the inhibition found in the initial screening for 11.

Among the tested compounds, five (24b, 42a, 42b, 54, 55) demonstrated more than 50% inhibition of the human norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp at 10 µM (Fig. 11A). To confirm RdRp inhibition, a gel-shift activity assay was again used to examine the five selected compounds at a fixed concentration of 100 µM (Fig. 11B) and three of the five compounds exhibited near complete abolishment of norovirus RdRp activity (42a, 42b, 54), whilst 55 only displayed minimal inhibition and 24b had no appreciable effect.

Four compounds have low micromolar IC50 values against human norovirus RdRp

The two initial hits identified from the virtual screening (11 and 13), and the three newly synthesised derivatives, which exhibited near complete abolishment of norovirus RdRp activity in the gel-based assay (42a, 42b, 54), were further assessed using a fluorescent RdRp assay to ascertain IC50 values (concentration range examined: 0.1–100 µM). Dose-dependent inhibitory response curves were used to establish IC50 values for the five test compounds (Table 2). While IC50 values could be attained for four of the five compounds tested, 42b displayed significant solubility issues, even in the 100% DMSO solvent. Therefore, 42b was too insoluble to attain a reliable confidence interval in the dose-response experiments and was not examined further. However, from the other four compounds, hit 11 and its phenyl derivative 54 gave the lowest IC50 values, 3–5 fold improved compared with 13 and its derivative 42a, confirming increased RdRp inhibitory activity associated with this scaffold.

Table 2 IC50 values of hit compounds against human norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activities.

Broad-spectrum calicivirus RdRp inhibitory activity

The antiviral activity of the four compounds (11, 13, 42a and 54) were examined for inhibition of RNA polymerases from other viruses spanning three genera of the Caliciviridae family, including Norovirus (human norovirus and MNV), Lagovirus (rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus [RHDV]) and Sapovirus (human sapovirus). All four compounds examined exhibited broad-spectrum inhibitory activity of the calicivirus RdRps at a fixed concentration of 100 µM, ranging between 44.4% inhibition (42a with MNV RdRp) through to 99.0% inhibition; (54 with RHDV RdRp) (Fig. 12A). The protein sequence of the examined calicivirus polymerases has an identity range between 30.2–61.4%, and therefore the broad-spectrum activity of these compounds could be attributed to a common, highly-conserved binding pocket across the RdRps, as has been previously reported with broad-spectrum activity of other site-B binding NNIs16. Moreover, the ability of each compound to inhibit the different RdRps in a similar range could be further confirmation of targeting a well-conserved binding site of the Caliciviridae family.

Figure 12

Broad-spectrum activity of hit compounds against calicivirus RdRps and examination of 54 in cell culture. (A) Effects of four compounds were evaluated against calicivirus RdRp activities (norovirus, MNV, RHDV and sapovirus) using an in vitro fluorescent activity assay at a fixed concentration of 100 µM. The mean values of triplicate datasets from at least two independent experiments are shown with standard deviations. (B) Dose-response effects of 54 (0.1–100 µM) were examined against MNV RdRp activity in vitro. The IC50 value and 95% confidence interval (CI) are shown on the graph. The mean values of triplicate datasets are shown with standard deviations. (C) RAW264.7 mouse macrophage cell viability was assessed with 54 (0.5–100 µM). The mean values of triplicate datasets from three independent experiments are shown with standard deviations. (D) The effects of 54 (0.5–50 µM) were assessed against MNV plaque formation in a plaque reduction assay. The mean values of triplicate datasets are shown with standard deviations.

To ensure the four hit compounds selectively inhibited calicivirus polymerase activity, they were further counter screened against a viral-like RdRp (bacteriophage Φ6) and an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase Moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV RT). None of the lead compounds reached 50% inhibition of the Φ6 and MMLV polymerases examined up to 100 μM (Supplementary Fig. S4). Overall, this demonstrated specificity for the calicivirus RdRps, in particular for the human Sydney 2012 RdRp (Fig. 12A and Supplementary Fig. S4).

MNV RdRp activity and cell culture evaluation on 54

As mentioned above, the only robust cellular assay available for the evaluation of potential norovirus inhibitors is the closely related MNV assay. Out of the novel compounds examined (54 and 42a; Fig. 12A), 42a demonstrated weak inhibition of MNV RdRp activity (<50% at 100 µM in Fig. 12A), which did not warrant further testing in cell culture. Evaluation of compounds 11 and 13 against MNV plaque formation in cell culture58 at two fixed concentrations of 10 and 100 µM did not give promising results. Compound 11 demonstrated 37.1% ± 2.7% inhibition of MNV plaque formation at 10 µM, but was cytotoxic at 100 µM, while compound 13 only reached 21.0% ± 1.2% inhibition of MNV plaque formation at 100 µM with no substantial differences between 10 and 100 µM (Supplementary Fig. S5). Compound 54, a novel chemical entity, demonstrated the broadest spectra of antiviral activity across the four RdRps, and the highest level of inhibition of the MNV RdRp (Fig. 12A). Consequently, 54 was further assessed to determine the IC50 value against MNV RdRp activity using an in vitro fluorescent assay. 54 (0.1–100 µM) displayed an IC50 of 12.1 µM against MNV RdRp (Fig. 12B). 54 was then assessed for cytotoxicity against RAW264.7 mouse macrophage cells using a cell viability assay. 54 (0.5–100 µM) exhibited a mean half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) of 62.8 µM (Fig. 12C). Using the plaque reduction assay, the inhibitory effects of 54 (0.5–50 µM) were examined against MNV plaque formation in cell culture. There was no appreciable effect on plaque numbers up to 25 µM, with RAW264.7 cells thinning at 50 µM, due to cytotoxicity (Fig. 12D). While 54 demonstrated an IC50 of 12.1 µM against the MNV RdRp in vitro, it had little effect against MNV in cell culture (EC50 > 50 µM). This could be due to poor cell membrane permeability of 54, as observed with PPNDS16 and suramin40, which, despite inhibiting the RdRp in an isolated enzyme activity assay, demonstrated a lack of antiviral activity in the cell-based assay. Compound solubility and its cell-membrane permeability properties could be further improved with structure-activity relationship enhancement of the 54 scaffold to facilitate cellular uptake, and therefore to increase antiviral efficacy. Work on this aspect is ongoing, and it will be reported in due course.

Binding site identification for 54: competitive assay, mutational analyses and molecular docking studies

Despite the minimal activity in the cell culture system, RdRp inhibition by 54 is an important finding in the search of novel norovirus inhibitors. In order to improve the drug-like properties of the molecule without negatively influencing the RdRp inhibitory activity, and to design more potent derivatives, knowledge of the correct binding site of 54 is fundamental. As mentioned before, the broad-spectrum activity displayed by 54 could be attributed to a common, highly conserved binding pocket across the RdRps, that could be either site-A (suramin) or site-B (PPNDS). 54 and PPNDS were examined in a combinational study to test for antagonism (Fig. 13A), which would help demonstrate binding to the same RdRp region. PPNDS (0.025–25 µM) and 54 (0.1–100 µM) were examined alone and together in a 1:4 ratio respectively (Fig. 13A), and the average of the combination indices at 50% (1.6), 75% (1.7) and 90% (1.8) inhibition was 1.7. These results indicate antagonism, and therefore likely competitive binding of 54 and PPNDS within RdRp site-B. This is a relevant finding since the site-B pocket of the human norovirus RdRp has previously been shown to be an ideal antiviral target due to its highly conserved structure16.

Figure 13

Compound 54 demonstrates competitive binding for the Site-B pocket with PPNDS, but displays unique amino acid interactions. (A) Isobologram of 54 (0.1–100 µM) and PPNDS (0.025–10 µM) examined in a 4:1 ratio respectively in combination. Together both molecules demonstrate antagonism against human norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity with an average combination index of 1.7 over 50%, 75% and 90% inhibition. (B) Relative inhibitory effects of 54 on wild-type norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp activity (red), mutants Q414 A (green) and R419A (purple), compared to mock treated samples (vehicle only). The IC50 values are shown on the graph. The mean values of triplicate datasets are shown from three independent experiments with standard deviations.

Given the evidence of 54 being a site-B binding NNI, residues Q414 and R419 were mutated to alanine. These residues were previously shown by our research group and others to be critical for human norovirus RdRp site-B binding NNIs, and can create resistance to the drug through their mutagenesis16,17,39. After the mutant RdRps’ transcriptional activity was confirmed in a fluorescent RdRp assay (Q414A: 54%, R419A: 34% of wild-type activity, respectively), dose-response curves for 54 (0.1–100 µM) were produced to compare the IC50 values between the wild-type RdRp and the two mutant RdRps, Q414A and R419A (Fig. 13B). The mean IC50 value for the wild-type RdRp was 7.4 µM, which was similar to the IC50 values for Q414A RdRp (7.8 µM) and R419A RdRp (10.2 µM). The lack of effect of these two mutations on the inhibitory activity of 54, together with the antagonism found with PPNDS, suggest that 54 may bind the site-B pocket of the polymerase with no specific interactions with Q414 and R419.

Molecular docking evaluations of 54 on the PPNDS binding site of human norovirus RdRp were performed using Glide SP. The proposed binding mode is shown in Fig. 14A,B. Compound 54 is predicted to occupy site-B in a different orientation compared to PPNDS, spanning an area that includes the central core of site-B and the initial part of site-A, where suramin places its sulphate head (Fig. 15). This binding could justify the antagonism results with PPNDS obtained in the combinational study. In fact, the value of 1.7 obtained is an indication of an antagonism/moderate-antagonism59, potentially meaning that 54 actually occupies only part of site-B to cause the antagonism, but does not occupy the entire site. The phenyl-benzenesulfonamide portion of 54 is pointing out from site-B toward the RdRp portion in which site-B and site-A overlap (Arg392 area), interacting through its sulphonamide group with Glu407 and Arg413, and through an arene-cation interaction between Arg392 and the benzene ring. No interactions are present between the phenyl ring and the protein, therefore its replacement by a thiazole, as in the initial hit 11, does not seem to influence binding, in accordance with the similar inhibitory activity found for 54 and 11 in the biological assay. The phenyl-pyrazolidine portion is occupying the area where PPNDS places is naphthylazo part (Fig. 14B), within the core area of site-B, making interactions with the surrounding amino acids (Asp507, Glu510). The phenyl ring is perfectly fitted for this part of the binding site and the presence of substituents in para position could reduce the binding affinity for the site, causing steric clashes with the near residues, potentially justifying the minimal RdRp inhibition found for the methyl derivative 55. Moreover, even if this portion of 54 is in proximity of Gln414 and Arg419, no interactions are present between the molecule and the two residues, in accordance with the lack of effect of the two mutations (Q414A and R419A) on the inhibitory activity of 54 (Fig. 13B).

Figure 14

Proposed binding mode for 54 in the human norovirus RdRp. (A) Compound 54 (carbon atoms in lilac) is occupying site-B in a different orientation compared to PPNDS (carbon atoms in pink) with its phenyl-benzenesulfonamide portion pointing out from the site-B interacting through its sulphonamide group with Glu407 and Arg413 and through an arene-cation interaction between Arg392 and the benzene ring. (B) The binding site rotated by 180° shows the phenyl-pyrazolidine portion of 54 occupying the area where PPNDS places its naphthylazo portion, the core area of site-B, making interactions with the surrounding amino acids (Asp507, Glu510). No interactions are present between 54 and the two residues, Glu414 and Arg419. The binding site area is represented as molecular surface. Human norovirus RdRp is represented as salmon ribbon.

Figure 15

Overlap of site-A (suramin) and site-B (PPNDS) on the norovirus RdRp. Superposition of the MNV RdRp structure (dark green ribbon) in complex with suramin (carbon atoms in dark purple) and the human norovirus RdRp structure (salmon ribbon) in complex with PPNDS (carbon atoms in pink). 54 (carbon atoms in lilac) occupies the central core of site-B and extends up to the initial part of site-A (Arg392 area), where suramin places its sulphate head.

Conclusions and Future Work

A virtual screening evaluation of commercially available, drug-like compounds (~300,000) was performed on the suramin and PPNDS binding-sites of the human norovirus RdRp. These two RdRp inhibitors occupy two different sites, A and B, situated in the NTP access pathway located between the fingers and thumb domains, and overlap each other in the central part of the protein. Selected compounds (n = 62) were examined for inhibition of human norovirus RdRp activity using an in vitro transcription assay. Five candidates demonstrated dose-dependent RdRp inhibition (>25% inhibition at 10 µM and >50% inhibition at 100 µM), which was confirmed using a gel-shift RdRp assay. Among them, two compounds, 11 and 13, were selected for an initial structure-activity relationship study. Synthetic efforts were made to develop the best synthetic pathway for the preparation of different derivatives of both hits. Among the newly prepared compounds, two showed interesting RdRp inhibition profiles. The two initial hits 11 and 13, together with the two newly prepared derivatives 42a and 54, displayed IC50 values against human norovirus RdRp activity in the micromolar range (5.0–27.4 µM), with the best results obtained for 11 and its close derivative 54. These four compounds also displayed broad-spectrum inhibitory activity of RdRps across three Caliciviridae genera, including Norovirus, Lagovirus and Sapovirus. There is little protein sequence identity between the examined calicivirus polymerases (30.2–61.4%), and therefore the broad-spectrum activity could be attributed to a common, highly-conserved binding pocket across the RdRps, as has been previously reported with broad-spectrum activity of other site-B binding NNIs16. While 54 demonstrated an IC50 of 12.1 µM against the MNV RdRp in vitro, it had little effect against MNV in cell culture (EC50 > 50 µM). This could be due to poor cell membrane permeability, as previously observed with PPNDS16 and suramin40.

Molecular docking studies revealed that the novel compound 54 is predicted to bind to the central core of site-B of the human norovirus RdRp, which has previously been shown to be an ideal antiviral target due to its highly conserved structure16. The proposed 54 binding mode was supported by combinational studies with PPNDS, the previously reported site-B binding norovirus NNI17. PPNDS and 54 were antagonistic in combination against norovirus RdRp activity, indicating that both compounds bind in the site-B pocket.

54 may form distinct interactions with other residues within site-B, as mutations of previously reported site-B residues (Q414A and R419A) had no appreciable effect on the inhibitory activity of 54 compared to wild-type RdRp activity.

The mode of inhibitory action of PPNDS was reported to be through fixation of the C-terminus of the polymerase within the active site, blocking incoming NTPs and the RNA template17. It is possible that 54 works in the same fashion, and the actual binding site of 54 could be resolved through further crystallography and mutational studies.

In conclusion, a novel NNI scaffold, 54, was found to be an effective and specific inhibitor of RdRps across three genera of the Caliciviridae, although there was little effect against MNV replication in cell culture, indicating that cell permeability could be further optimised. In silico and combinational studies suggest that 54 binds the highly conserved site-B in the RdRp, and therefore this compound represents a promising starting point for further structure-activity relationship enhancement, to improve potency, solubility and specificity profiles in the quest for an effective antiviral against human norovirus.



Recombinant RdRp expression, purification and mutagenesis

Recombinant calicivirus RdRps (GenBank accession numbers) norovirus GII.Pe/GII.4 Sydney 2012 (KT239579), MNV GV CW1 (DQ285629), RHDV Czech V351 (KF594473.1), and SaV GI.1 Mc114 (AY237422) were expressed and purified as described previously60,61. RdRp resistance mutants were generated using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Quantitative RdRp activity and gel-based assays

Fluorescent RdRp activity assays were carried out as previously described14,62. Briefly, RdRp activity was quantified by monitoring the formation of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) from a single stranded homopolymeric template, poly(C) (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), using the fluorescent dye PicoGreen (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RdRp assays were performed in 384-well plates, and each reaction mixture contained 400 ng enzyme, 45 µM GTP, 10 ng/µL poly(C) RNA, 2.5 mM MnCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, (DTT), 0.01% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.005% Tween 20 in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, with a final reaction volume of 25 µL. The previous published norovirus NNI NIC02 was used as a positive control14. RdRps were incubated for 10 mins at 30 °C in the presence of the test compounds or the compound vehicle DMSO (0.5% vol/vol) before addition into the reaction mixture, which was then allowed to run 15 min at 30 °C then terminated with 10 mM EDTA, followed by PicoGreen staining and dsRNA quantitation. GraphPad Prism V6.05 (La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to plot the IC50 values. In cases where fluorescent enhancement was recorded for a compound instead of inhibition, a secondary gel-based polymerase activity assay was used as a counter-screen as described below, to exclude the possibility of RdRp activity enhancement (Supplementary Fig. S1). Primed elongation activity was examined in a gel-based assay as previously described16,63 using the RNA template (PE44-NoV, Fig. 4D). Gels were imaged using BioRad (Hercules, CA, U.SA) Geldoc Universal Hood II, running BioRad Image Lab software, V4.1, build 16. Antagonism was calculated using Compusyn software V1.059. 54 and PPNDS (4:1 ratio) were tested alone and together against norovirus Sydney 2012 RdRp.

The Pseudomonas Φ6 bacteriophage RdRp (NEB) reactions were set up as described above (Fluorescent RdRp activity assays), using 400 ng of RdRp per reaction.

Cell culture of MNV and cytotoxicity assays

MNV-1 (CW1) culture assays were performed as previously described14. Replication was examined using plaque assays58,64,65. Cytotoxicity was examined using a CellTitre Blue (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) viability assay as described previously14.

Inhibition of viral reverse transcriptase

Lead hits were examined for inhibition of Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (RT) (kit M02535 (NEB)). MMLV RT activity reactions were carried out using 200 U MMLV RT (NEB) per reaction, with 250 ng homopolymeric poly(A) RNA template (average length 300 nucleotides, Sigma-Aldrich), 50 nM oligo dT15 primer, 1 × MMLV NTP buffer (NEB) and 0.1 mM dTTP in a final volume of 25 µL. The RT was incubated with the compound or the compound vehicle (0.5% DMSO) for 10 min, and then reactions were initiated by the addition of the RNA and primer mix. The reaction was incubated for 1 h at 42 °C then the RT was deactivated by incubation at 65° for 20 min. Picogreen stain was added and the relative fluorescence was measured as described above in the ‘Quantitative RdRp activity and gel-based assays’ section.

Molecular Modelling

All molecular modelling studies were performed on a Viglen Genie Intel®CoreTM i7-3770 vPro CPU@ 3.40 GHz × 8 running Ubuntu 14.04. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2015.1066, Maestro (Schrödinger Release 2017–1), LeadIT (version 2.1.8), OpenEye Scientific Software and PLANTS were used as molecular modelling software. Pharmacophoric filters were created within MOE choosing the PCH (polar-charged-hydrophobic) scheme. Shape-comparison screening was performed with ROCS version Both shape and color screen criteria were applied to the query. Output conformations were ranked according to the Tanimoto combo score and the shape Tanimoto score. A library of commercially available compounds was downloaded from SPECS website ( in sdf format and prepared using the Conformational Search tool in MOE for the pharmacophore studies and the Omega version for the shape-based screening.

RdRp crystal structures were downloaded from Protein Data Bank (PDB) (; PDB code 3UR0 (suramin), 4LQ3 (PPNDS) and prepared with the MOE Protein Preparation tools for the pharmacophore studies and PLANTS docking. Docking PLANTS simulations for the virtual screening were performed using the following parameters: search algorithm: aco_ants 20, aco_evap 0.15, aco_sigma 2.0; binding site: bindingsite_center [−2.665 5.272 33.756] for suramine crystal [−19.229 −25.402 −4.634] for PPNDS crystal, bindingsite_radius 10; cluster algorithm: cluster_rmsd 2.0, cluster_strucures 5; scoring function: chemplp. The docking results obtained were then rescored using Glide XP and FlexX scoring functions.

Docking of 54 in the PPNDS binding site was performed using Glide docking program. The RdRp structure co-crystallised with PPNDS (PDB code: 4LQ3) was prepared using the Schrödinger Protein Preparation Wizard by assigning bond orders, adding hydrogens and performing a restrained energy minimization of the added hydrogens using the OPLS_2005 force field. An 11 Å docking grid (inner-box 11 Å and outer-box 220 Å) was prepared using as centroid the co-crystallised structure of PPNDS. Molecular docking of 54 was performed using Glide SP precision keeping the default parameters and setting 10 as number of output poses to include in the solution. The docking output database was saved as mol2 file and the docking poses visually inspected for their binding mode in MOE.

The visual inspection process, conducted as last step of the structure-based and the ligand-based virtual screening, was performed using MOE 2015.10. The docking poses of the compounds obtained from the consensus score procedure were evaluated considering the following criteria:

  • ability of a compound to overall occupy the binding site (suramine or PPNDS binding site);

  • number of interactions formed between the compound and the target protein (H-bonds, pie-pie interactions, etc.);

  • coverage of different chemical scaffolds, discarding similar chemical entities;

  • potential chemical instability;

  • presence of potential toxic groups (multiple halogen atoms, aldehyde, etc.).


All solvents and reagents were used as obtained from commercial sources unless otherwise indicated. All solvents used for chromatography were HPLC grade from Fisher Scientific (UK). All reactions were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance DPX500 spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for 13C, with Me4Si as internal standard. Deuterated chloroform was used as the solvent for NMR experiments, unless otherwise stated. 1H chemical shifts values (δ) are referenced to the residual non-deuterated components of the NMR solvents (δ = 7.26 ppm for CHCl3, etc.). The 13C chemical shifts (δ) are referenced to CDCl3 (central peak, δ = 77.0 ppm). Mass spectra were determined with a Bruker microTOF spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI source). For mass spectra, solutions were made in HPLC grade methanol. TLC was performed on silica gel 60 F254 plastic sheets. Flash column chromatography was performed using silica an Isolera Biotage system. UPLC-MS analysis was used for purity/mass determination of the tested compounds using a Waters UPLC system with both Diode Array detection and Electrospray (+’ve and –‘ve ion) MS detection. The stationary phase was a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 1.7 um 2.1 × 50 mm column. The mobile phase was H2O containing 0.1% Formic acid (A) and MeCN containing 0.1% Formic acid (B). Column temperature: 40 °C. Sample diluent: acetonitrile. Sample concentration 1 µg/mL. Injection volume 2 µL. A linear gradient standard method (A) was used: 90% A (0.1 min), 90–0% A (2.6 min), 0% A (0.3 min), 90% A (0.1 min); flow rate 0.5 mL/min. All compounds tested in biological assays were >95% pure. Purity of intermediates was >90%, unless otherwise stated.


  1. 1.

    Bartsch, S. M., Lopman, B. A., Ozawa, S., Hall, A. J. & Lee, B. Y. Global economic burden of norovirus gastroenteritis. PLoS One. 11, e0151219 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Kaufman, S. S. et al. Characteristics of human calicivirus enteritis in intestinal transplant recipients. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 40, 28–333 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Bok, K. & Green, K. Y. Norovirus gastroenteritis in immunocompromised patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2126–2132 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Bagci, S. et al. Clinical characteristics of viral intestinal infection in preterm and term neonates. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29, 1079–1084 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Pang, X. L., Honma, S., Nakata, S. & Vesikari, T. Human caliciviruses in acute gastroenteritis of young children in the community. J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl 2), S288–294 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Nakanishi, K. et al. Detection of enteric viruses in rectal swabs from children with acute gastroenteritis attending the pediatric outpatient clinics in Sapporo, Japan. J. Clin. Virol. 46, 94–97 (2009).

  7. 7.

    van Asten, L. et al. Unspecified gastroenteritis illness and deaths in the elderly associated with norovirus epidemics. Epidemiology. 22, 336–343 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Trivedi, T. K. et al. Clinical characteristics of norovirus-associated deaths: a systematic literature review. Am. J. Infect. Control. 41, 654–657 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Jones, M. K. et al. Enteric bacteria promote human and mouse norovirus infection of B cells. Science. 346, 755–759 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Ettayebi, K. et al. Replication of human noroviruses in stem cell-derived human enteroids. Science. 353, 1387–1393 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Wobus, C. E., Thackray, L. B. & Virgin, H. W. 4th Murine norovirus: a model system to study norovirus biology and pathogenesis. J. Virol. 80, 5104–5112 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Rossignol, J. F. & El-Gohary, Y. M. Nitazoxanide in the treatment of viral gastroenteritis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 24, 1423–1430 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Siddiq, D. M., Koo, H. L., Adachi, J. A. & Viola, G. M. Norovirus gastroenteritis successfully treated with nitazoxanide. J. Infect. 63, 394–397 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Eltahla, A. A. et al. Nonnucleoside inhibitors of norovirus RNA polymerase: scaffolds for rational drug design. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3115–3123 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Jin, Z. et al. Biochemical evaluation of the inhibition properties of favipiravir and 2′-c-methyl-cytidine triphosphates against human and mouse norovirus RNA polymerases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 7504–7516 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Netzler, N. E. et al. Broad-spectrum non-nucleoside inhibitors for caliciviruses. Antiviral. Res. 146, 65–75 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Tarantino, D. et al. Naphthalene-sulfonate inhibitors of human norovirus RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase. Antiviral. Res. 102, 23–28 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Hussey, R. J. et al. A structural study of norovirus 3C protease specificity: binding of a designed active site-directed peptide inhibitor. Biochemistry. 50, 240–249 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Prior, A. M. et al. Design, synthesis, and bioevaluation of viral 3C and 3C-like protease inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 6317–6320 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Tiew, K. C. et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of inhibitors of Norwalk virus 3C protease. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21, 5315–5319 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Kaufman, S. S., Green, K. Y. & Korba, B. E. Treatment of norovirus infections: moving antivirals from the bench to the bedside. Antiviral. Res. 105, 80–91 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Rohayem, J. et al. Antiviral strategies to control calicivirus infections. Antiviral. Res. 87, 162–178 (2010).

  23. 23.

    Sofia, M. J., Chang, W., Furman, P. A., Mosley, R. T. & Ross, B. S. Nucleoside, nucleotide, and non-nucleoside inhibitors of hepatitis C virus NS5B RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase. J. Med. Chem. 55, 2481–2531 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Carroll, S. S. et al. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by 2′-modified nucleoside analogs. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11979–11984 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Galmarini, C. M., Mackey, J. R. & Dumontet, C. Nucleoside analogues: mechanisms of drug resistance and reversal strategies. Leukemia. 15, 875–890 (2001).

  26. 26.

    Loeb, L. A. et al. Lethal mutagenesis of HIV with mutagenic nucleoside analogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1492–1497 (1999).

  27. 27.

    Roussos, A. et al. Lamivudine treatment for acute severe hepatitis B: report of a case and review of the literature. Acta Gastroenterol. Belg. 71, 30–32 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Lawitz, E. et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1878–1887 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Wood, M. J. et al. A randomized trial of acyclovir for 7 days or 21 days with and without prednisolone for treatment of acute herpes zoster. N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 896–900 (1994).

  30. 30.

    Cihlar, T. & Fordyce, M. Current status and prospects of HIV treatment. Curr. Opin. Virol. 18, 50–56 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Khungar, V. & Han, S. H. A systematic review of side effects of nucleoside and nucleotide drugs used for treatment of chronic Hepatitis B. Curr. Hepat. Rep. 9, 75–90 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Lee, H., Hanes, J. & Johnson, K. A. Toxicity of nucleoside analogues used to treat AIDS and the selectivity of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 42, 14711–14719 (2003).

  33. 33.

    Kolawole, A. O., Rocha-Pereira, J., Elftman, M. D., Neyts, J. & Wobus, C. E. Inhibition of human norovirus by a viral polymerase inhibitor in the B cell culture system and in the mouse model. Antiviral. Res. 132, 46–49 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Caillet-Saguy, C., Simister, P. C. & Bressanelli, S. An objective assessment of conformational variability in complexes of hepatitis C virus polymerase with non-nucleoside inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 414, 370–384 (2011).

  35. 35.

    de Bethune, M. P. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), their discovery, development, and use in the treatment of HIV-1 infection: a review of the last 20 years (1989-2009). Antiviral. Res. 85, 75–90 (2010).

  36. 36.

    Andreone P. et al. ABT-450, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir achieves 97% and 100% sustained virologic response with or without ribavirin in treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 1b infection. Gastroenterology. 147, 359–365 e351 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Mastrangelo, E. et al. Structure-based inhibition of norovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. J. Mol. Biol. 419, 198–210 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Croci, R. et al. PPNDS inhibits murine norovirus RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase mimicking two RNA stacking bases. FEBS Lett. 588, 1720–1725 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Croci, R. et al. Structural bases of norovirus RNA dependent RNA polymerase inhibition by novel suramin-related compounds. PLoS One. 9, e91765 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Mastrangelo, E. et al. Delivery of suramin as an antiviral agent through liposomal systems. ChemMedChem. 9, 933–939 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Kaplan, L. D. et al. Lack of response to suramin in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex. Am. J. Med. 82, 615–620 (1987).

  42. 42.

    Broder, S. et al. Effects of suramin on HTLV-III/LAV infection presenting as Kaposi’s sarcoma or AIDS-related complex: clinical pharmacology and suppression of virus replication in vivo. Lancet. 2, 627–630 (1985).

  43. 43.

    Simeonov, A. et al. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1. PLoS One. 4, e5740 (2009).

  44. 44.

    Ferrer-Orta, C., Ferrero, D. & Verdaguer, N. RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerases of picornaviruses: from the structure to regulatory mechanisms. Viruses. 7, 4438–4460 (2015).

  45. 45.

    Bassetto, M. et al. Shape-based virtual screening, synthesis and evaluation of novel pyrrolone derivatives as antiviral agents against HCV. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27, 936–940 (2017).

  46. 46.

  47. 47.

    Korb, O., Stützle, T. & Exner, T. E. PLANTS: Application of ant colony optimization to structure-based drug design. In: Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence, 5th International Workshop, ANTS. Brussels, Belgium, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp, 245–258 September 4–7, 2006.

  48. 48.

    Kramer, B., Rarey, M. & Lengauer, T. CASP-2 experiences with docking flexible ligands using FlexX. Porteins: Structure, Functions, and Genetics, Supp l. 1:1, 221–225 (1997).

  49. 49.

    Schrödinger Release 2017–1: Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2017.

  50. 50.

    Bassetto, M. et al. Computer-aided identification, design and synthesis of a novel series of compounds with selective antiviral activity against chikungunya virus. Antiviral. Res. 98, 12–18 (2013).

  51. 51.

    OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM.

  52. 52.

    Eltahla, A. A., Lackovic, K., Marquis, C., Eden, J. S. & White, P. A. A fluorescence-based high-throughput screen to identify small compound inhibitors of the genotype 3a hepatitis C virus RNA polymerase. J. Biomol. Screen. 18, 1027–1034 (2013).

  53. 53.

    Pomel, V. et al. Furan-2-ylmethylene thiazolidinediones as novel, potent, and selective inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ. J. Med. Chem. 49, 3857–3871 (2006).

  54. 54.

    Chandrappa, S. Inhibition of gastric H+, K+-ATPase by novel thiazolidinone derivatives. J. Sulfur. Chem. 31, 189–196 (2010).

  55. 55.

    Vloo, W. J., Kruk, C., Pandit, U. P., Hofs, H. P. & McVie, J. G. Synthesis and biological properties of side-chain-modified bleomycins. J. Med. Chem. 30, 20–24 (1987).

  56. 56.

    Zhang, C. et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel tacrine-multialkoxybenzene hybrids as multi-targeted compounds against Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 116, 200–209 (2016).

  57. 57.

    Houille, O. et al. Preparation of pyrazolidinedione derivatives and their use as platelet aggregation inhibitors. From PCT Int. Appl., 2005002574(13 Jan 2005).

  58. 58.

    Wobus, C. E. et al. Replication of Norovirus in cell culture reveals a tropism for dendritic cells and macrophages. PLos Biol. 12, 2076–2084 (2004).

  59. 59.

    Chou, T. C. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer. Res. 70, 440–446 (2010).

  60. 60.

    Bull, R. A. et al. Comparison of the replication properties of murine and human calicivirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Virus Genes. 42, 16–27 (2011).

  61. 61.

    Urakova, N. et al. Purification and biochemical characterisation of rabbit calicivirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and identification of non-nucleoside inhibitors. Viruses. 8, 100 (2016).

  62. 62.

    Jones, L. A., Clancy, L. E., Rawlinson, W. D. & White, P. A. High-affinity aptamers to subtype 3a hepatitis C virus polymerase display genotypic specificity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 3019–3027 (2006).

  63. 63.

    Eltahla, A. A., Tay, E., Douglas, M. W. & White, P. A. Cross-genotypic examination of hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitors reveals a novel mechanism of action for thumb binders. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 7215–7224 (2014).

  64. 64.

    Rocha-Pereira, J., Cunha, R., Pinto, D. C., Silva, A. M. & Nascimento, M. S. 2010. (E)-2-styrylchromones as potential anti-norovirus agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18, 4195–4201 (2010).

  65. 65.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat.methods. 9, 671–675 (2012).

  66. 66.

    Molecular Operating Environment (MOE 2015.10); Chemical Computing Group, Inc.: ontreal, Quebec, Canada; URL, (2015).

Download references


A.B. and S.F. acknowledge the support of the Life Science Research Network Wales grant n°. NRNPGSep14008, an initiative funded through the Welsh Government’s Sêr Cymru program. M.B. is supported by the Sêr Cymru II programme which is partially funded by Cardiff University and the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government. P.A.W., N.E.N. and D.E.T. acknowledge the support from National Health and Medical Research Council project grants (APP1083139 and APP1123135). N.E.N. and D.E.T. acknowledge support through Australian Postgraduate Awards and Research Excellence Awards.

Author information

S.F., A.B. and M.B. conceived the study and supervised the project; N.N. and D.E.T. performed and interpreted the biological experiments under the supervision of P.A.W.; S.F., S.F. and M.B. worked on the molecular modelling; S.V. and M.B. worked on the synthesis developing and compounds characterization; S.G. co-supervised the work of S.F. All the authors analysed the data. N.N. and S.F. wrote the manuscript with the help of P.A.W. and M.B.

Correspondence to Salvatore Ferla.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferla, S., Netzler, N.E., Ferla, S. et al. In silico screening for human norovirus antivirals reveals a novel non-nucleoside inhibitor of the viral polymerase. Sci Rep 8, 4129 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.