Structural and mechanistic insights into the inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus polymerase by a non-nucleoside inhibitor

Yu, Xiaodi; Abeywickrema, Pravien; Bonneux, Brecht; Behera, Ishani; Anson, Brandon; Jacoby, Edgar; Fung, Amy; Adhikary, Suraj; Bhaumik, Anusarka; Carbajo, Rodrigo J.; De Bruyn, Suzanne; Miller, Robyn; Patrick, Aaron; Pham, Quyen; Piassek, Madison; Verheyen, Nick; Shareef, Afzaal; Sutto-Ortiz, Priscila; Ysebaert, Nina; Van Vlijmen, Herman; Jonckers, Tim H. M.; Herschke, Florence; McLellan, Jason S.; Decroly, Etienne; Fearns, Rachel; Grosse, Sandrine; Roymans, Dirk; Sharma, Sujata; Rigaux, Peter; Jin, Zhinan

doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05451-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 21 October 2023

Structural and mechanistic insights into the inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus polymerase by a non-nucleoside inhibitor

Communications Biology volume 6, Article number: 1074 (2023) Cite this article

2782 Accesses
1 Citations
6 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The respiratory syncytial virus polymerase complex, consisting of the polymerase (L) and phosphoprotein (P), catalyzes nucleotide polymerization, cap addition, and cap methylation via the RNA dependent RNA polymerase, capping, and Methyltransferase domains on L. Several nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors have been reported to inhibit this polymerase complex, but the structural details of the exact inhibitor-polymerase interactions have been lacking. Here, we report a non-nucleoside inhibitor JNJ-8003 with sub-nanomolar inhibition potency in both antiviral and polymerase assays. Our 2.9 Å resolution cryo-EM structure revealed that JNJ-8003 binds to an induced-fit pocket on the capping domain, with multiple interactions consistent with its tight binding and resistance mutation profile. The minigenome and gel-based de novo RNA synthesis and primer extension assays demonstrated that JNJ-8003 inhibited nucleotide polymerization at the early stages of RNA transcription and replication. Our results support that JNJ-8003 binding modulates a functional interplay between the capping and RdRp domains, and this molecular insight could accelerate the design of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs.

Conserved allosteric inhibitory site on the respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerases

Article Open access 19 June 2023

A dual mechanism of action of AT-527 against SARS-CoV-2 polymerase

Article Open access 02 February 2022

Structural basis for inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase by suramin

Article 05 March 2021

Introduction

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of infant hospitalization for acute lower respiratory tract infections¹ and poses a major health burden in the elderly², immunosuppressed patients³, and patients carrying comorbidities^4,5. While next-generation antibodies and promising new vaccines under development offer possibilities for efficient and large-scale prevention, additional strategies are required for allowing pre-exposure prophylactic and post-exposure treatments. Several virus-entry inhibitors targeting the RSV fusion protein have demonstrated efficacy in proof-of-concept phase II human challenge and patient studies^6,7,8,9, but it is unknown whether they alone will provide the best antiviral efficacy or combination with other therapies would be more suitable. Notably, the most advanced post-entry inhibitors target either the viral nucleoprotein¹⁰ or the viral polymerase^11,12.

The RSV polymerase complex is composed of the large protein (L), a multidomain protein having RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), polyribonucleotidyl transferase (PRNTase) or capping, and methyltransferase (MTase) activities, and four phosphoproteins (P) (Fig. 1a)^13,14. The RdRp domain is essential for both transcription and replication of the viral RNA genome. The capping and the MTase domains contribute to the formation of capped and methylated mRNAs and have been functionally mapped to conserved regions V and VI of the L protein, respectively^15,16,17,18. Co-transcriptional mRNA 5’ cap addition is a critical step in mRNA synthesis that allows for the production of full-length, functional mRNA transcripts in RSV and the closely related vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)^16,19,20. The intrusion (amino acid (a.a.) 1325–1354) and priming (a.a. 1261–1282) loops of the capping domain play critical roles in the capping activities^21,22. P acts as a crucial component to control the efficiency of L, interacting with nucleocapsid, and guiding the newly synthesized RNA into the L active sites during transcription and replication processes (Fig. 1a)^23,24,25.

**Fig. 1: JNJ-8003 is a picomolar NNI of RSV L + P.**

During the past decade, significant advancements have been made in comprehending the spatial organization of the RSV polymerase^26,27. The two structures of the RSV L + P complex provide a clear picture of the central L- RdRp and capping domains, and L P interactions. In contrast to the structures of the VSV L, likely illustrating pre-initiation or initiation stages with a putative priming loop extending into the RdRp active site^28,29, both RSV L structures are postulated to depict an elongation stage with the analogous priming loop being withdrawn from the polymerase catalytic center^26,27.

Inhibiting the RSV polymerase activity is a promising strategy to discover anti-RSV antivirals, and several nucleoside analog inhibitors (NIs)^30,31 and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNIs)^{32,33,34,35,36,37} have been identified. Despite numerous studies exploring their precise modes of action, the discovery of RSV polymerase inhibitors has been lacking structural information revealing the exact drug-target interactions. Here, we document a RSV polymerase NNI, JNJ-8003, with its viral polymerase target, resistance profile, and inhibition characteristics. The cryo-EM structure of the RSV L + P complex with JNJ-8003 uncovered an induced fit binding pocket on the capping domain and provided insight into the mechanism of action (MOA) of this complex, which will guide future efforts in structural-based drug discovery.

Results

JNJ-8003 is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of the RSV polymerase

Approximately 5000 analogs were synthesized to optimize the pharmacological properties of a series that emerged from the initial screening campaign hit. This iterative optimization process involved a combination of phenotypic and target-based antiviral assessments, leading to the discovery of JNJ-8003 (Fig. 1b)³⁸. JNJ-8003 exhibited significant inhibition against RSV A2 replication in a reporter assay (EC_50: 0.78 nM; CC₅₀: 27 µM), moderate inhibition against the closely related human metapneumovirus (HMPV, EC₅₀: 88 nM), and negligible inhibition against the distantly related parainfluenza viruses (PIV-1 and PIV-3) and VSV (Supplementary Table 1, 2). JNJ-8003 inhibited the replication of RSV A and B clinical isolates and laboratory strains similarly by RT-qPCR (EC₅₀: 0.18 nM and 0.10 nM, respectively; Supplementary Table 1). Inhibition of an RSV subgenomic replicon assay (EC₅₀: 0.15 nM; CC₅₀: 11 µM; Supplementary Table 1) indicated that JNJ-8003 possesses a post-entry mode of action. In biochemical assays, JNJ-8003 inhibited the RdRp activity in both Flashplate and gel-based 4-mer primer extension assays using the recombinant L and P viral proteins (IC₅₀: 0.67 nM; Fig. 1c, d, and Supplementary Table 1), indicating that the RSV L + P polymerase complex is the primary target for JNJ-8003. In contrast, JNJ-8003 did not inhibit human DNA polymerases α, β, and γ, human mitochondrial RNA polymerase, and human RNA polymerase II (IC₅₀: >100 µM; Supplementary Table 1).

JNJ-8003 inhibits viral RNA replication and transcription at the initiation and early elongation stage

RSV polymerase catalyzes de novo RNA synthesis for its genome replication and mRNA transcription^39,40,41. RSV genome replication starts at the first nucleotide of its genome and anti-genome (+1 site at the 3’-end of the leader or trailer promoter sequence). RNA transcription starts at the third nucleotide of its genome (+3 site at the 3’-end of the leader sequence); after making a short RNA transcript, which is abortive, the polymerase scans to the first gene start (gs) signal to restart RNA transcription and makes the first capped mRNA³⁹. The inhibitory effect of JNJ-8003 on RSV genome replication and mRNA transcription was confirmed by a cell-based minigenome assay, in which both the antigenome RNA and mRNA showed dose dependent reduction upon JNJ-8003 treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Further analysis of these RNA molecules indicated that JNJ-8003 inhibited RNA synthesis both from the +1 (1U) and +3 (3C) initiation sites within the 44 nt leader (le) promoter region, suggesting it inhibits the initiation or early elongation of both RNA replication from the +1 site and RNA transcription from the +3 site in the le promoter (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

To determine whether JNJ-8003 inhibits RNA synthesis at the early elongation steps, primed single nucleotide incorporation (SNI) assays with a set of short RNA primers complementary to the 3’end of an 11-mer leader (le-11) and 14-mer trailer (tr−14) promoter sequences were performed with the recombinant RSV L + P. JNJ-8003 inhibited nucleotide addition to a 2-, 4-, 5- or 6-mer primer complementary to le−11 (Fig. 2a) or tr-14 starting from the +1 site, representing primed RNA replication (Supplementary Fig. 2, 3). JNJ-8003 also inhibited SNI to a 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-mer primer complementary to le−11 starting from the +3 site representing primed RNA transcription (Fig. 2b). However, JNJ-8003 did not inhibit SNI to the 3-mer primer from the +1 site for both the le and tr promoter RNA, suggesting a distinctive SNI mechanism unaffected by JNJ-8003 (Fig. 2a, c, d, f, g). The IC₅₀ values of JNJ-8003 in the SNI assays ranged from 17 to 32 nM, indicating JNJ-8003 can inhibit primed RNA elongation from as early as a dinucleotide primer for both +1 and +3 site-initiated RNA synthesis (Fig. 2f–h). De novo RNA synthesis assay from the tr−14 RNA template was performed to test if JNJ-8003 inhibits de novo dinucleotide formation. JNJ-8003 inhibited pppGpA dinucleotide formation initiated from the +3 site with an IC₅₀ of 5.1 nM (Supplementary Fig. 4). The various IC₅₀ values observed in these assays likely reflected the IC₅₀ walls determined by the actual active enzyme concentrations but not the true potency of the compound. In sum, our current data supports the conclusion that JNJ-8003 inhibits RNA transcription as early as at the de novo dinucleotide formation step and RNA replication at the AC to ACG extension step. Since the assay development of terminal de novo formation of pppApC from the +1 site had not been successful in our hand yet, the direct effects of JNJ-8003 on de novo dinucleotide formation starting from the +1 site are unknown. Finally, JNJ-8003 had no impact on MTase activity, using a recombinant MTase-CTD fragment, or full-length RSV L + P protein (Supplementary Fig. 5).

**Fig. 2: JNJ-8003 inhibits RNA synthesis at early elongation steps.**

JNJ-8003 targets the capping domain of RSV L

JNJ-8003 stabilized the purified RSV L + P complex with an increase in melting temperature (Tm) of 6.0 °C in a thermal shift assay (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) demonstrated JNJ-8003 bound to the RSV L + P complex with a K_d of 0.84 nM, an on-rate of 2.16 µM⁻¹ s⁻¹, and a slow off-rate of 0.0000181 s⁻¹. Escape mutations were selected at 1x EC₉₀ concentrations of JNJ-8003 (Supplementary Table 3). Compared to Ribavirin, BI-D, or AZ-27, JNJ-8003 showed a distinctive resistance profile (Supplementary Table 3, 4)^34,42,43. C₁₃₈₈G amino acid substitution appeared independently in the capping domain of RSV L (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 3, 4). Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry analysis confirmed three regions in the capping domain showed reduced deuterium uptake in the presence of JNJ-8003 (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 8) suggesting JNJ-8003 binds within the capping domain.

Cryo-EM structure of RSV L + P complex with JNJ-8003 explains its potency

Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of RSV L + P in complex with JNJ-8003 resulted in a 3D reconstruction with a global resolution of 2.9 Å (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 9, Table 1). Similar to the Apo structure (PDBID: 6PZK), the L- RdRp and capping domains, and the P oligomerization domains (OD) and their partial C-terminal domains (CTD) were visible in the model. JNJ-8003 binding only induced subtle conformational changes of the L- RdRp and capping domains, with a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value of 0.41 Å. The priming loop shielded the conserved capping domain catalytic ‘HR’ motif (H₁₃₃₈, and R₁₃₃₉), leaving the nucleotide polymerization active-site wide open in an RNA elongation mode (Fig. 3b).

**Fig. 3: Cryo-EM structure reveals the binding environment of JNJ-8003.**

Table 1 Data collection, reconstruction, and model refinement statistics of cryo-EM structures.

Full size table

Non-protein density was observed at the capping domain and was modeled as JNJ-8003 (Fig. 3a, c). JNJ-8003 filled a mostly hydrophobic pocket of 397 Å³ volume. Noteworthy was the proximity of the ligand to its resistance substitution C₁₃₈₈G (Supplementary Fig. 9, Supplementary Table 3, 4). JNJ-8003 made multiple interactions with residues in this pocket. The cinnoline ring of JNJ-8003 made hydrogen-bond and π-stacking interactions with the guanidinium group of R₁₃₄₅. One weak van-der-Waals interaction was observed between the methoxy group of JNJ-8003 and S₁₂₆₆ from the priming loop. The amide group linker of JNJ-8003 intercalated with hydrogen bonds from the C = O of I₁₃₈₁ and NH of F₁₃₈₅. The (S)-OH group stereo-specifically interacted with the NH and C = O of I₁₃₈₁. The CF3 group remained solvent accessible. Both the cinnoline ring and CF3 groups had the potential to form van-der-Waals interactions with H₁₃₃₈ from the ‘HR’ motif in the capping active site. The OH group of the isopropanol substituent was in contact with the C = O of L₁₃₇₂ and could potentially form a hydrogen bond that forms essential interactions with the backbone groups of the protein. The fluoro-phenyl group interacted with F₁₃₈₅ with a T-shaped π-π stacking. WaterMap simulation predicted multiple water molecules around JNJ-8003, especially the one bridging the hydrogen-bond interaction between Q₁₃₈₆ and JNJ-8003 (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Fig. 10).

The comparison of the ligand binding site from the JNJ-8003 bound and the Apo structures revealed notable side chain flips of F₁₃₈₅ and H₁₃₃₈ (Fig. 3c, e, f, Supplementary Movie 1). The side chains of F₁₃₈₅ and H₁₃₃₈ from the Apo structures produced steric clashes with the superimposed JNJ-8003 and had to reorganize to allow the observed binding mode. The solution NMR conformations of the free JNJ-8003 adopted mostly a V-shaped conformer (Fig. 3g, Supplementary Fig. 11, Supplementary Table 5, 6) with the pyridine-cinnoline rings spatially close with an angle of ~60°. This was substantially different from the extended pose of JNJ-8003 in the cryo-EM structure, indicating induced fits in both the RSV L capping domain and JNJ-8003 upon binding (Fig. 3f, g).

JNJ-8003 binding site explains its specificity

RSV and HMPV L proteins share 48% overall sequence identity, but the JNJ-8003 binding sites are highly conserved with an RMSD of 1.29 Å, and with I₁₃₈₃ and C₁₃₈₈ changed to Leucine and Alanine in HMPV L, respectively (Fig. 3c, h, Supplementary Fig. 12). In contrast, the homologous pocket is strikingly different in VSV L (Fig. 3c, i, Supplementary Fig. 12). VSV L hosts several residues with larger side chains within the corresponding JNJ-8003 binding site. In particular, S₁₂₂₁, I₁₃₆₈, N₁₃₆₉, I₁₃₈₁, I₁₃₈₃, and V₁₃₈₄ in RSV L are changed to V₁₁₀₃, M₁₂₅₇, R₁₂₅₈, F₁₂₆₅, F₁₂₆₇, and L₁₂₆₈ in VSV L, respectively. In addition, the R₁₂₃₃, and F₁₂₃₉ in the VSV L intrusion loop (R₁₃₄₅, and F₁₃₄₉ in RSV L, respectively) within the intrusion loop point away from the JNJ-8003 binding site (Fig. 3c, i, Supplementary Fig. 12). It is interesting to note that H₁₂₂₇ adopts a rotamer similar to the H₁₃₃₈ observed in the JNJ-8003 bound RSV L + P structure, suggesting that H₁₂₂₇ (H₁₃₃₈ in RSV L) may have various rotamers during capping process. These structural differences provide a molecular basis for why JNJ-8003 specifically inhibits RSV and HMPV, but not VSV, PIV-1, or −3 (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 12), and they further provide a rational for designing a new generation of broad-spectrum polymerase inhibitors targeting negative-sense single-stranded RNA (-ssRNA) viruses of members of the order Mononegavirales.

The JNJ-8003 binding pocket may participate in the capping activities

Mononegavirales polymerase adopts a distinctive mechanism for mRNA capping formation, as exemplified by the VSV polymerase. The mRNA capping involves the covalent attachment of the monophosphorylated 5’ terminus of the nascent transcript (pRNA) to a histidine side chain from the ‘HR’ motif (H₁₃₃₈ in RSV L) forming a covalent enzyme (L-pRNA). This is followed by the transfer of pRNA onto GDP (Gpp), ending with the GpppRNA capped product^44,45 (Supplementary Fig. 13a). The development of the capping assays recapitulating these events using the recombinant RSV L + P complex was not successful yet, therefore the direct effect of JNJ-8003 on capping could not be tested. However, JNJ-8003 binding opens a ‘gate’ (H₁₃₃₈ and F₁₃₈₅), creating a novel connected cavity that could potentially be involved in capping (Fig. 4a). The guanosine diphosphate (GDP) guanine base can be docked to the left or right sides of the cavity with the phosphate group pointing towards the conserved ‘HR’ motif (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, GDP did not bind to the purified RSV L + P, suggesting GDP alone may not be sufficient to open the ‘gate’ for capping (Supplementary Fig. 13b). Further research involving structural studies on the RSV L + P complex with pre-mRNA, both in the presence and absence of GDP, and additional biochemical analyses are required to uncover the capping mechanism of RSV. Our structure sheds light on the plasticity of the capping domain that may be involved in modulating the capping activity and provides the molecular basis of an otherwise hidden druggable site for future inhibitor design.

**Fig. 4: The JNJ-8003 binding pocket may be involved in RNA capping.**

Discussion

Here we employed multiple approaches to assess the mechanism of action of a RSV non-nucleoside inhibitor, JNJ-8003. The thermal shift assay and the SPR results demonstrated that JNJ-8003 binds tightly to the RSV L + P complex. Our structure showed JNJ-8003 binds at the capping domain forming multiple interactions with residues consistent with the resistant mutation profile. The inhibition of de novo RNA synthesis from a tr−14 RNA template indicated that JNJ-8003 inhibits de novo initiation of dinucleotide formation from the +3 site. The SNI primer extension assays showed JNJ-8003 can inhibit all primer extension events, except for ACG to ACGC or ACGA extension using the le−11 or tr−14 template respectively. This step may represent a distinctive step during the early elongation stage or the initiation to elongation transition stage, and further characterization of RNA synthesis at this stage is underway. Since the enzymatic activity of primer extension of the 6-mer primer was already low (Fig. 2a), suggesting RSV polymerase could not efficiently accept exogenous longer primer as substrate, the effect of JNJ-8003 on longer primer extension was not studied and its direct effect on productive RNA chain elongation in the middle or late stage of RNA synthesis is unknown. Inhibition of the de novo initiation and short primer extension activities by JNJ-8003 eventually leads to the inhibition of RNA genome replication and mRNA transcription in the minigenome assay and viral replication in the antiviral assays. Thus JNJ-8003 binding at the capping domain completely shut down the RdRp function of RSV L + P complex.

Several NIs and NNIs had been explored to inhibit the function of RSV polymerase (Supplementary Fig. 14a). While most of their binding sites on RSV L remained unknown, the locations of their resistance mutations had been mapped on RSV L and provided insight into their MOA (Supplementary Fig. 14b–d). Unlike VSV L + P, a structure of full-length RSV L is not currently available. However, during manuscript preparation, the availability of Alphafold2⁴⁶ provided a glimpse of a model of full-length RSV L, which will require validation using experimental cryo-EM structures in the future. The binding sites of YM-53403³², AZ-27^33,34, PC786³⁵, AVG-233³⁶, and AstraZeneca inhibitor cpd 1³⁷ had been mapped to the connecting domain of an alphafold2 predicted model. Escape mutations in residues L₁₅₀₂, Y₁₆₃₁, and H₁₆₃₂ are clustered at the N-terminal boundary of the connecting domain of an alphafold2 predicted model (Supplementary Fig. 14d). Inhibitor binding did not interfere with the L P interaction but might disrupt the transition of the priming loop from preinitiation to elongation states³⁶.

The binding site of BI-compound D (BI-D) was proposed to be in the capping domain evidenced by three resistance substitutions (I₁₃₈₁S, L₁₄₂₁F, or E₁₂₆₉D) in this domain (Supplementary Fig. 14c)⁴⁷. In comparison to the resistance profile of JNJ-8003, BI-D was unlikely to target the JNJ-8003 binding site. Our structure revealed that the van-der-Waals interaction between C₁₃₈₈ and the fluorobenzene group of JNJ-8003 was disrupted by substitution with glycine, reducing the potency of JNJ-8003 by more than 200-fold (Supplementary Table 4). However, this substitution did not impact the inhibition potency of BI-D. Further, BI-D could not be docked into the JNJ-8003 pocket because of its larger size (Supplementary Fig. 14a, d). All these results suggested BI-D target a pocket near the JNJ-8003 binding site with a different MOA. Indeed, BI-D inhibited mRNA transcription differently from JNJ-8003. Short abortive RNA products (<50 nucleotides) were increased while full mRNA transcripts were inhibited in the presence of increased BI-D⁴⁷. Later, it was found that BI-D increased RNA products initiated from the +3 site but had no significant effect on products from the +1 site, and it specifically reduced capped RNA formation²¹. Our polyacrylamide gel results indicated that JNJ-8003 inhibited primed RNA extension as early as from a 2-mer primer, during the early elongation stages of both transcription and replication (Fig. 2). It also was able to inhibit de novo dinucleotide initiation on the tr−14 template from the +3 position (Supplementary Fig. 4).

The capping domain plays an essential role in productive transcription and replication in addition to its capping activities^21,22. Substitutions (P₁₂₆₁, W₁₂₆₂, G₁₂₆₄, T₁₂₆₇, E₁₂₆₉, N₁₃₃₅, and R₁₃₃₉) within the intrusion and priming loops of the capping domain were shown to cause defects in transcription and replication^21,22. JNJ-8003 forms extensive interactions with L₁₃₃₇, H₁₃₃₈, R₁₃₄₅, and F₁₃₄₉ of the intrusion loop, potentially impacting the RdRp and capping activities (Figs. 3c, 5a). Moreover, the priming loop, which hosts the putative priming residues (P₁₂₆₁, and W₁₂₆₂) to stabilize the initiating NTPs during de novo initiation, undergoes large conformational changes from the pre-initiation/initiation state to the elongation state (Figs. 3b, 5b)²². Our results show that JNJ-8003 directly contacts S₁₂₆₆ of the priming loop with a van-der-Waals interaction (Fig. 5a), potentially reducing the mobility of the priming loop. The a.a. 660-688 is within the non-resolved regions of the RSV RdRp domain and does not have a direct interaction with JNJ-8003. An AlphaFold2-predicted RSV L model indicated that L₆₅₉T₆₆₀R₆₆₁ sits at the top of an α helix, positioned next to the G₈₁₀D₈₁₁N₈₁₂ active site, which may directly or allosterically coordinate with the priming loop during the pre-initiation/initiation and/or early elongation steps (Fig. 5b).

**Fig. 5: Proposed mode of action of JNJ-8003.**

The binding of JNJ-8003 resulted in a novel pocket around the ‘HR’ motif that was not present in the Apo RSV, HMPV, VSV polymerase structures (Fig. 4). We hypothesize that this pocket may play a role in the capping process due to its location and size. The capping process needs meticulous coordination between newly synthesized uncapped mRNA and GDP near the ‘HR’ motif to ensure efficient mRNA capping (Supplementary Fig. 13a, b). The plasticity of the capping domain highlighted in our JNJ-8003 bound RSV L + P structure provides a rationale for developing a new generation of broad-spectrum polymerase inhibitors to combat Mononegavirales viruses.

Methods

Inhibition of rgRSV224 reporter RSV in HeLa cells

Black 384-well clear-bottom microtiter plates (Corning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were filled via acoustic drop ejection using the echo liquid handler (Labcyte, Sunnyvale, California). 200 nL of compound stock solutions (100% DMSO) were transferred to the assay plates. 9 serial 4-fold dilutions of compound were made. The assay was initiated by adding 20 µL of culture medium to each well (RPMI medium) without phenol red, 10% FBS-heat inactivated, 0.04% gentamycin (50 mg/mL) containing rgRSV224⁴⁸ virus (multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 1). rgRSV224 virus is an engineered virus that includes an additional GFP gene⁴⁸ and was in-licensed from the NIH (Bethesda, MD, USA). All addition steps are done by using a multidrop dispenser (Thermo Scientific, Erembodegem, Belgium). Finally, 20 µL of a HeLa cell suspension (3000 cells/well) were plated. Medium, virus- and mock-infected controls were included in each test. The wells contain 0.05% DMSO per volume. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. Three days post-virus exposure, viral replication was quantified by measuring GFP expression in the cells with an EnVision Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer, Zaventem, Belgium). The EC₅₀ was defined as the 50% inhibitory concentration for GFP expression. In parallel, compounds were incubated for three days in a set of white 384-well microtiter plates (Corning) and the cytotoxicity of compounds in HeLa cells was determined by measuring the ATP content of the cells using the ATPlite kit (Perkin Elmer, Zaventem, Belgium) instructions and a ViewLux uHTS Microplate Imager apparatus (PerkinElmer, Zaventem, Belgium) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The CC₅₀ was defined as the 50% concentration for cytotoxicity.

Inhibition of RSV-A and B clinical isolates and laboratory strains

96 well blackview microtiter plates were filled with JNJ-8003 in quadruplicate in a 9 points 4-fold compound dilution starting (final volume of 50 µl) in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM L-glutamine, and 0.02 µg/ml gentamicin. Then, 100 µL of a HeLa cell suspension (5 × 10⁴ cells/mL) in culture medium was added to each well. Next, 50 µL of the appropriate virus dilution was added and cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. For each virus strain (Supplementary Table 7), virus stock dilutions with minimal intracellular cross point (Cp) values ranging from 19 to 28 and with minimal intra-group variation (Standard deviation [SD] <1) were selected for the antiviral assay. After 3 days of incubation, the supernatant was removed from wells. Plates were washed twice with ice-cold PBS (100 µL/well), and were then sealed and stored overnight at −80 °C. Next, 50 µL of lysis solution supplemented with DNAse was added to the plates and incubated for 5 min followed by the addition of 5 µL stop solution (Ambion Cell-to-C_T bulk lysis reagent buffer). Plates were placed 2 minutes at room temperature and transferred thereafter on ice before being tested by RT-qPCR for positive strand RSV RNA.

In brief, cell lysate was added to RSV-A or RSV B or β-actin reverse primers (Supplementary Table 8) at 0.27 µM before initial denaturation (75 °C for 5 s). The product of the reaction was mixed with 10x PCR buffer BI (containing 15 mM MgCl₂), MgCl₂ (3.5 mM), dNTP (1 mM), RNase inhibitor (1 U/µL), and Expand Reverse Transcriptase (1 U/µL; Roche) for cDNA synthesis. Reverse transcription was performed at 42 °C for 30 min, followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min. The PCR reaction was prepared by adding 2x master mix (Roche), RSV-A or RSV-B forward primer mixes at 0.3 µM, RSV-A or RSV-B reverse primers mix at 0.3 µM, RSV-A or RSV-B probes at 0.1 µM, β-actin forward primer at 0.3 µM, β-actin reverse primer at 0.3 µM, β-actin probe at 0.1 µM to the cDNA product (Supplementary Table 8). The reaction consisted of a denaturation step (95 °C for 600 s), 45 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 15 s) and annealing/elongation (60 °C for 60 s), and a step of cooling (40 °C for 10 s).

Assuming that a change of 1 Cp value is equivalent to a 2-fold difference in original RNA content, EC₅₀ value (inhibitor concentration leading to a 2-fold reduction of the viral RNA content as compared to the virus control) and EC₉₀ value (inhibitor concentration leading to 10-fold reduction of the viral RNA content as compared to the virus control) were calculated from corresponding Cp values by graphic interpolation.

Minireplicon assay

The RSV subgenomic replicon system was licensed from Apath (Apath, NY, USA)^49,50. The BHK-derived cell line (APC-126) containing the stable RSV A2 replicon was cultured in DMEM/Hams F-12 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco), 1% (v/v) penicillin (10,000 units/mL) and streptomycin (10,000 µg/mL) solution (Gibco), 1% (v/v) MEM non-essential amino acids solution (Gibco), 5% (v/v) Tryptose Phosphate Broth solution (29.5 g/l) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 µg/ml of blasticidin solution (Invivogen). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO₂ atmosphere. 5000 cells were plated in 96-well clear plates (Corning) in 100 µl/well of medium. On the following day, the tested compound was solubilized in 100% DMSO before being transferred in duplicate to the culture plate with 9 points 3-fold serial dilution starting at 10 µM for EC₅₀ determination or 100 µM for CC₅₀ determination (100 µl final volume; 1% DMSO final concentration). Cells were incubated with compounds for 3 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere before measurement of the luciferase readout (Promega Renilla Glo assay, 100 µl/well of reagent). Cell viability (CC₅₀ and CC₉₀) was measured with a CellTiter-Glo cell proliferation assay (Promega, 100 µl/well of reagent). Results were expressed as EC₅₀ and EC₉₀ values as well as CC₅₀ and CC₉₀ values.

Resistance selection experiments

Resistance selection was performed on a recombinant RSV A2 strain harboring an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene (rgRSV224)⁴⁸, in HeLa cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), in triplicate, starting with a MOI of 0.01 and maintaining a compound pressure of 3 or 10 nM (1 or 3x EC₉₀, respectively). Passages were performed when 90% of the culture appeared infected (GFP⁺). At each passage, culture supernatants were collected to inoculate a new culture flask. A fraction of the collected culture supernatant was RNA-sequenced by next generation sequencing (NGS). A cut-off value of 15% of the viral RNA population frequency, in comparison to the original sequence and non-treated control, was applied to eliminate background signals. Selected passages were also subjected to limiting dilution, to isolate single resistant mutants and evaluate shift in JNJ-8003 potency. Mutations confirmed by a > 10 shift in JNJ-8003 potency, or appearing in multiple replicates upon compound pressure, were considered as resistant mutations.

RSV minigenome assay

RSV transcription and RNA replication were analyzed using a replication-deficient minigenome, in which the minigenome template contained a single nucleotide substitution in the trailer region, limiting it to the antigenome step of RNA replication and uncoupling transcription from replication⁵¹. Minigenome transcription and replication were reconstituted intracellularly. BSR-T7 cells, a T7 RNA polymerase expressing cell line, were cultured in a 6-well dish and transfected with T7-driven plasmids that expressed the minigenome template (200 ng/ well), and the RSV proteins N (400 ng/ well), P (200 ng/ well), L (100 ng/ well) and M2-1 (100 ng/ well). Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine (Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s directions. The compound JNJ-8003 was diluted in DMSO and added to the media at the time of transfection at the concentrations indicated. DMSO was maintained at a consistent concentration in each transfection reaction. At 40–48 h post transfection, cells were harvested, and total intracellular RNA was purified using Trizol (Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s directions, except that following the isopropanol precipitation step, the RNA was subjected to an additional round of purification by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Input minigenome RNA, antigenome RNA, and mRNAs were detected by subjecting RNA to electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose-formaldehyde gels in MOPS buffer, followed by Northern blotting using ³²P labeled riboprobes specific to negative sense minigenome (to detect the input RNA) and to positive sense antigenome and mRNAs. The same RNA samples were also analyzed by primer extension using ³²P end-labeled primers corresponding in sequence to nucleotides 15–39 of the leader region (to detect RNA initiated from the +1U and +3 C sites on the promoter). Primer extension analysis to detect the RNAs initiated at +1U and +3 C was performed by reverse transcription at 37˚C using Sensiscript reverse transcriptase⁵². The +1U and +3 C primer extension products were migrated on 8% acrylamide gels containing 7 M urea gel in tris-borate-EDTA buffer. Quantification was performed by phosphorimage analysis. In each case, the signal from the -L lane was subtracted from the signal values for each of the other lanes, to account for background and RNA products generated by the RSV polymerase were normalized to the level of input minigenome RNA, which was used as a control for transfection efficiency.

Expression and purification of the RSV L + P complex

Codon-optimized Human RSV L protein (strain A2) with an N-terminal twin StrepTag and RSV P protein (strain A2) with a C-terminal 6x His-tag were subcloned into the pFastBac Dual vector, and the baculovirus was prepared using standard procedures. L + P complex was expressed in Sf9 cells by infecting with the recombinant baculoviruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 pfu/cell for 72 h post-infection. Cells were lysed by Dounce homogenization and passing through the microfluidizer in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP) supplemented with Complete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and 20 U/mL Benzonase (EMD Millipore). After clarification by high-speed centrifugation, the cell lysate was loaded onto a StrepTactin-XT column (Cytiva), and the bound protein was eluted using 50 mM biotin in Strep Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP). The eluted L + P complex was pooled and diluted with half volume of heparin buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM TCEP, pH 8.0), and was further purified using a heparin column (Cytiva). The L + P complex was eluted from the heparin column using a NaCl gradient from 200-500 mM over 15 column volumes. The peak fractions containing pure L + P was pooled and supplemented with NaCl to bring the final NaCl concentration to 500 mM and concentrated with an Amicon Ultra 100 kDa cutoff centrifugal filter. The concentrated sample was loaded on to a size-exclusion column (Superpose 6 Increase 16/600, Cytiva) equilibrated in 50 mM HEPES, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.5. The fractions at the middle of the peak containing pure L + P complex were pool, concentrated to ~0.8 mg/ml, flash-frozen, and stored at −80 °C. The quality of purified proteins was analyzed by SDS-PAGE gel.

Biotinylated primer extension assay using recombinant RSV P + L

RNA polymerase reaction samples consisted of recombinant RSV L-P polymerase (3 nM) in a buffer containing Tris pH 7.5 (20 mM), KCl (10 mM), dithiothreitol (2 mM), Triton (0.01%), DMSO (10% v/v) with compound at appropriate dilution (10 points 1:5-fold serial dilution starting at 1 µM), and MgCl₂ (6 mM). Reactions were started at 30 °C by adding an oligonucleotide template sequence derived from the RSV leader promoter (5’-UUUGUUCGCGU-3’, 0.2 μM) together with a biotinylated primer (5’-bi-ACGC, 4 μM) mixed with GTP (10 µM), ATP (10 µM) and [α-³³P]CTP (0.025 µM, 3000 Ci/mmol) in a final volume of 10 μL. Reactions were stopped after 120 min by the addition of 90 µl EDTA (0.1 M). Samples were transferred to Flashplates and left 1 h at room temperature for incubation before being washed twice with 0.1% Tween 20, sealed (Topseal) and read on a Wallac MicroBeta TriLux Liquid Scintillation Counter.

Single and multiple nucleotide incorporation assay using recombinant RSV P + L

RNA polymerase reaction samples consisted of 0.2 μM recombinant RSV L-P polymerase, 0.2 μM of an RNA template (Le11 or Tr14), and 400 μM of a short primer (sequences as indicated in the figures), mixed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 2 mM dithiothreitol and 6 mM MgCl₂. For the assay in Fig. 1d, reactions were started by adding 100 nM [α-³²P]GTP (3000 Ci/mmol) tracer and incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Then 5% DMSO or 5 μM JNJ-8003 was added and incubated for 5 min before adding nucleotides that were incubated for another 15 min. For single nucleotide incorporation assays, the enzyme, RNA primer, and template were mixed with 5% DMSO or JNJ-8003 (at concentrations as indicated in figures) and incubated at 30 °C for 10 min and then the reactions were started by adding 100 nM [α-³²P]NTP (3000 Ci/mmol) tracer and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by adding an equal volume of gel loading buffer containing 90% formamide, 50 mM EDTA, 0.05% Xylene Cyanol, and Bromophenol Blue. Samples were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min and run on a 22.5% polyacrylamide urea sequencing gel at 80 W. The gel was transferred onto a Whatman cellulose chromatography paper (Millipore Sigma) and dried on a gel dryer (Bio-Rad) for 1 h. The dried gel was exposed to a phosphor-screen, scanned on a Typhoon phosphorimager (GE Healthcare), and quantified using ImageQuant (GE Healthcare).

De novo RNA synthesis assay using recombinant RSV P + L

The reactions were performed as described by Cressey et al.²². The reactions contained 10 nM RSV L/P, 2 μM RNA template (Tr14), 500 μM GTP, 10 μM ATP, 170 nM [α-³³P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol), and 5% DMSO or JNJ-8003 at various concentrations, in a buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris pH7.4, 8 mM MgCl₂, 6 mM dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 1 h and then stopped by adding gel loading buffer containing 90% formamide, 50 mM EDTA, 0.05% Xylene Cyanol and Bromophenol Blue. Samples were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min and run on a 22.5% polyacrylamide urea sequencing gel at 80 W with radiolabeled RNA markers generated via the T7 DNA dependent RNA polymerase (DdRp). The gel was dried, exposed to a phosphor-screen, scanned on a Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare), and quantified using ImageQuant (GE Healthcare). Bands were identified as extension products or initiation products by the 11-nucleotide pppGAGAAAAAAAG and 2-nucleotide pppGA RNA markers, respectively. Radiolabeled RNA markers corresponding to pppGA, pppGAGAAAAAAAG, and intermediates were generated utilizing a reaction by T7 DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (AM2718, Ambion)⁵³. DNA oligos: 5’-TAATACGACTCACTATA-3’ (T7 promoter primer) and 5’-ACTTTTTTTCTCATATAGTGAGTCGTATTA-3’ (T7 promoter primer + target sequence template) were synthesized at IDT. Due to a mechanistic idiosyncrasy in T7 DdRp, an additional Adenosine residue was placed between the T7 promoter and the target sequence in the template. Each 40 µl reaction contained 5 mM ATP, 5 mM CTP, 5 mM GTP, 100 nM annealed DNA primer and template, 20 U T7 DdRp, 1x T7 DdRp Buffer (40 mM Tris pH 7.8, 20 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM Spermidine HCl, 10 mM DTT), and 20 µCi of [α-³³P]ATP. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 5 h. Then 1 µl of reconstituted DNase I (Ambion) was added and incubated for an additional 10 min at 37 °C. This reaction was quenched with the addition of 60 µl gel loading buffer.

NMR conformational analysis

All NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a Bruker 500 MHz instrument equipped with a 5 mm room temperature SmartProbe. Chemical shifts (δ values) are given in parts per million (ppm) and referenced to the DMSO (2.50 ppm) residual signal. For the structural assignment of the molecule the following spectra were acquired in DMSO-d6: 1D ¹H, 2D COSY, ¹³C-HSQC, ¹³C-HMBC, and 2D EASY-ROESY (mixing time 300 ms; relaxation delay 5 s) using the standard pulse sequences available in TopSpin (v. 4.1.0, Bruker GmbH). NMR data was processed and analyzed using MNova (v. 14.2.1, Mestrelab Research S.L.). 2D cross-peaks from the 2D EASY-ROESY spectrum were integrated and converted into distances using the Stereofitter plug-in (v. 1.1.1) embedded in MNova, where the PANIC method is used to normalize intensities relative to the diagonal peaks⁵⁴, and correction factors applied to compensate for the number of spins in each environment (corrected integral).

The exploration of the conformational landscape of the molecule was carried out using Maestro (v. 12.6, Schrödinger, LLC) using a mixed torsional/low-mode sampling method with the OPLS3e force field. The energy threshold was set to 15 Kcal/mol and the cutoff for maximum atom deviation to 0.5 Å, generating 638 conformers. Using the Stereofitter tool, this set of conformers was fitted against the NMR constraints to yield solutions representing the poses that give the best agreement with the experimental data.

Grid preparation and data acquisition

The purified RSV L + P complex was diluted 1:1 with the buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP) containing 50 µM JNJ-8003 and incubated on ice for one hour prior to freezing grids. 3.5 µL of the RSV L + P JNJ-8003 complex was applied to the plasma-cleaned (Gatan Solarus) Quantifoil 1.2/1.3 holey gold grid and subsequently vitrified using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI Company). Grids were loaded into a Titan Krios transmission electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific) with a post-column Gatan Image Filter (GIF) operating in a nanoprobe at 300 keV with a Gatan K3 Summit direct electron detector and an energy filter slit width of 20 eV. Images were recorded with Leginon in counting mode with a pixel size of 0.832 Å and a nominal defocus range of −1.4 to −2.3 μm. Images were recorded with a 1.5 s exposure and 40 ms subframes (38 total frames) corresponding to a total dose of ~52 electrons per Å2. All details corresponding to individual datasets are summarized in Table 1.

Electron microscopy data processing

A total of 11631 dose-fractioned movies were gain-corrected, and beam-induced motion correction using MotionCor2⁵⁵ with the dose-weighting option. The particles were automatically picked from the dose-weighted, motion-corrected average images using Relion 3.0⁵⁶. CTF parameters were determined by Gctf⁵⁷. A total of ~0.8 million particles were then extracted using Relion 3.0 with a box size of 280 pixels. The 2D and 3D classifications and refinements were performed with Relion 3.0 using the binned datasets. Two rounds of 2D classification and one round of 3D classification were performed to select the homogenous particles. One set of 519118 unbinned homogenous particles were re-extracted and then submitted to 3D auto-refinement without symmetry imposed. Per-particle CTF estimation was refined using the CTF refinement within Relion and followed by one round of 3D auto-refinement with a soft binary mask. CryoDRGN⁵⁸ was performed using the parameters from the last iteration of the 3D auto-refinement. Further analysis via CryoDRGN, or signal subtraction & refinement was not able to trace the signals corresponding to the CD, MT, and CTD domains indicating those are highly mobile, probably due to the flexible loops flanked on both sides of the CD domain as indicated from the HDX results. Bulky densities corresponding to region 660-688 were observed on top of the palm close to the active site GD₈₁₁N, highlighting its dynamic nature. 3D classifications and 3D refinements were started from a 60 Å low-pass filtered version of an ab initio map generated with Relion 3.0. All resolutions were estimated by applying a soft mask around the protein complex density and based on the gold-standard (two halves of data refined independently) FSC = 0.143 criterion. Prior to visualization, all density maps sharpened by applying different negative temperature factors using automated procedures, along with the half maps, were used for model building. Local resolution was determined using ResMap⁵⁹ (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Model building and refinement

The initial template of the RSV L + P complex was derived from a homology-based model calculated by SWISS-MODEL⁶⁰. The model was docked into the EM density map using Chimera⁶¹ and followed by manual adjustment using COOT⁶². Note that the EM density around the P regions was poor relative to other parts of the model. The P regions were modeled using the unsharpened maps together with the deepEMhancer⁶³ maps that were calculated with the half maps from the focus refinements. Each model was independently subjected to global refinement and minimization in real space using the module phenix.real_space_refine in PHENIX⁶⁴ against separate EM half-maps with default parameters. The model was refined into a working half-map, and improvement of the model was monitored using the free half map. Model geometry was further improved using Rosetta⁶⁵. The geometry parameters of the final models were validated in COOT and using MolProbity⁶⁶ and EMRinger⁶⁷. These refinements were performed iteratively until no further improvements were observed. The final refinement statistics were provided in Table 1 Model overfitting was evaluated through its refinement against one cryo-EM half map. FSC curves were calculated between the resulting model and the working half map as well as between the resulting model and the free half and full maps for cross-validation (Supplementary Fig. 9). Figures were produced using PyMOL⁶⁸ and Chimera.

WaterMap

WaterMap computes within a workflow of restrained molecular dynamics simulations, solvent clustering, and statistical thermodynamic analysis, various properties of water molecules, including location, occupancy, enthalpy, entropy, and free energy^69,70. 2 ns explicit-solvent MD simulation of the holo protein-ligand complex, and the holo protein unbound ligand were performed using the program Desmond of the Schrodinger Maestro 2021-1 suite. The OPLS4 force field was used for protein and ligand atoms together with the TIP4P water model. In the truncated protein set-up mode, only residues within 10 Å of the ligand were simulated as restrained flexible residues. The coordinates of the protein were restrained with a 5.0 kcal/mol/Å² harmonic potential applied to the initial positions of the heavy atoms, which ensured convergence of the water sampling around the protein conformation of interest. The protein structure of the L was prepared with the Schrodinger Maestro 2021-1 Protein Preparation Wizard; missing loop regions with less than 25 residues were modeled using the program Prime and free N- and C-termini were caped for the simulations.

GDP docking

GDP docking was performed in Glide SP of the Schrödinger Maestro 2021-1 suite using the JNJ-8003 structure as a reference. The ligand box of 20 Å edge length was centered on JNJ-8003.

Statistics and reproducibility

Graphs were prepared using GraphPad Prism 9.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, including mean, standard deviation, and standard error, as indicated in relevant figure legends and tables. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to derive IC₅₀ values by fitting inhibition data to a four-parameter logistic equation (Hill equation). All graphs either show the mean as a bar in the bar graphs or show fitted-curves and individual data points in dot plot graphs; refer to the legends for the number of independent or technical replicates performed. Independent replicates of experiments were performed on different days or at different times of the same day or with separately prepared materials. The source data for the graphs presented is included in Supplementary Data 1–13.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The map was deposited in the electron microscopy data bank (EMDB) with ID EMD-29452, and the atomic model in the protein data bank (PDB) with ID 8FU3. The source data for graphs can be found in Supplementary Data 1–13. The original gel images for Fig. 2f–h are in Supplemental Fig. 3 and Supplemental Data 1. All other data that support the findings in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

Li, Y. et al. National burden estimates of hospitalisations for acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2019 among 58 countries: a modelling study. Lancet Respir. Med. 9, 175–185 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Shi, T. et al. Global disease burden estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infection in older adults in 2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 222, S577–S583 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chatzis, O. et al. Burden of severe RSV disease among immunocompromised children and adults: a 10 year retrospective study. BMC Infect. Dis. 18, 111 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chaw, P. S. et al. Acute lower respiratory infections associated with respiratory syncytial virus in children with underlying congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 222, S613–S619 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Chaw, P. S. et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute lower respiratory infections in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 222, S620–S627 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DeVincenzo, J. P. et al. Oral GS-5806 activity in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. N. Engl. J. Med 371, 711–722 (2014).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Korell, J., Green, B., DeVincenzo, J. & Huntjens, D. A human challenge model for respiratory syncytial virus kinetics, the pharmacological effect of a novel fusion inhibitor, and the modelling of symptoms scores. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 109S, S154–S160 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Stevens, M. et al. Antiviral activity of oral JNJ-53718678 in healthy adult volunteers challenged with respiratory syncytial virus: a placebo-controlled study. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 748–756 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DeVincenzo, J. et al. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Human Challenge Study of the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of RV521, an Inhibitor of the RSV-F Protein. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01884-19 (2020).
Kazmierski, W. M. & ebrary Inc. xiii, 438 p. (Wiley,, Hoboken, N.J., 2011).
DeVincenzo, J. et al. Safety and anti-viral effects of nebulized PC786 in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. J. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa716 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
DeVincenzo, J. P. et al. Activity of oral ALS-008176 in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. N. Engl. J. Med 373, 2048–2058 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grosfeld, H., Hill, M. G. & Collins, P. L. RNA replication by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is directed by the N, P, and L proteins; transcription also occurs under these conditions but requires RSV superinfection for efficient synthesis of full-length mRNA. J. Virol. 69, 5677–5686 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, Q., Hardy, R. W. & Wertz, G. W. Functional cDNA clones of the human respiratory syncytial (RS) virus N, P, and L proteins support replication of RS virus genomic RNA analogs and define minimal trans-acting requirements for RNA replication. J. Virol. 69, 2412–2419 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ogino, T. & Green, T. J. Transcriptional control and mRNA Capping by the GDP polyribonucleotidyltransferase domain of the rabies virus large protein. Viruses 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060504 (2019).
Li, J., Rahmeh, A., Morelli, M. & Whelan, S. P. A conserved motif in region v of the large polymerase proteins of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses that is essential for mRNA capping. J. Virol. 82, 775–784 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ogino, T. & Banerjee, A. K. Unconventional mechanism of mRNA capping by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of vesicular stomatitis virus. Mol. Cell 25, 85–97 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ogino, M., Ito, N., Sugiyama, M. & Ogino, T. The rabies virus L protein catalyzes mRNA capping with GDP polyribonucleotidyltransferase activity. Viruses 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/v8050144 (2016).
Tekes, G., Rahmeh, A. A. & Whelan, S. P. A freeze frame view of vesicular stomatitis virus transcription defines a minimal length of RNA for 5’ processing. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002073 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ogino, T. Capping of vesicular stomatitis virus pre-mRNA is required for accurate selection of transcription stop-start sites and virus propagation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 12112–12125 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Braun, M. R. et al. RNA elongation by respiratory syncytial virus polymerase is calibrated by conserved region V. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006803 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cressey, T. N. et al. Distinctive features of the respiratory syncytial virus priming loop compared to other non-segmented negative strand RNA viruses. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010451 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rahmeh, A. A. et al. Critical phosphoprotein elements that regulate polymerase architecture and function in vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14628–14633 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sourimant, J. et al. Fine mapping and characterization of the L-polymerase-binding domain of the respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein. J. Virol. 89, 4421–4433 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galloux, M. et al. Characterization of a viral phosphoprotein binding site on the surface of the respiratory syncytial nucleoprotein. J. Virol. 86, 8375–8387 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cao, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the respiratory syncytial virus RNA polymerase. Nat. Commun. 11, 368 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gilman, M. S. A. et al. Structure of the respiratory syncytial virus polymerase complex. Cell 179, 193–204.e114 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang, B. et al. Structure of the L protein of vesicular stomatitis virus from electron cryomicroscopy. Cell 162, 314–327 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jenni, S. et al. Structure of the vesicular stomatitis virus L protein in complex with its phosphoprotein cofactor. Cell Rep. 30, 53–60.e55 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, G. et al. Discovery of 4’-chloromethyl-2’-deoxy-3’,5’-di-O-isobutyryl-2’-fluorocytidine (ALS-8176), a first-in-class RSV polymerase inhibitor for treatment of human respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Med. Chem. 58, 1862–1878 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sidwell, R. W., Robins, R. K. & Hillyard, I. W. Ribavirin: an antiviral agent. Pharm. Ther. 6, 123–146 (1979).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sudo, K. et al. YM-53403, a unique anti-respiratory syncytial virus agent with a novel mechanism of action. Antivir. Res. 65, 125–131 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Noton, S. L. et al. Respiratory syncytial virus inhibitor AZ-27 differentially inhibits different polymerase activities at the promoter. J. Virol. 89, 7786–7798 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tiong-Yip, C. L. et al. Characterization of a respiratory syncytial virus L protein inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3867–3873 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Coates, M. et al. Preclinical characterization of PC786, an inhaled small-molecule respiratory syncytial virus L protein polymerase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00737-17 (2017).
Sourimant, J. et al. Orally efficacious lead of the AVG inhibitor series targeting a dynamic interface in the respiratory syncytial virus polymerase. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo2236 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Laganas, V. A. et al. Characterization of novel respiratory syncytial virus inhibitors identified by high throughput screen. Antivir. Res. 115, 71–74 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grosse, S. et al. RSV INHIBITING 3-SUBSTITUTED QUINOLINE AND CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES (2021).
Noton, S. L. & Fearns, R. Initiation and regulation of paramyxovirus transcription and replication. Virology 479-480, 545–554 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cao, D. et al. In Vitro primer-based RNA elongation and promoter fine mapping of the respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 95, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01897-20 (2020).
Cressey, T. N., Noton, S. L., Nagendra, K., Braun, M. R. & Fearns, R. Mechanism for de novo initiation at two sites in the respiratory syncytial virus promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 6785–6796 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McCormick, J. B. et al. Lassa fever. Effective therapy with ribavirin. N. Engl. J. Med. 314, 20–26 (1986).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mason, S. W. et al. Polyadenylation-dependent screening assay for respiratory syncytial virus RNA transcriptase activity and identification of an inhibitor. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4758–4767 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ogino, T., Yadav, S. P. & Banerjee, A. K. Histidine-mediated RNA transfer to GDP for unique mRNA capping by vesicular stomatitis virus RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3463–3468 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Neubauer, J., Ogino, M., Green, T. J. & Ogino, T. Signature motifs of GDP polyribonucleotidyltransferase, a non-segmented negative strand RNA viral mRNA capping enzyme, domain in the L protein are required for covalent enzyme-pRNA intermediate formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 330–341 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liuzzi, M. et al. Inhibitors of respiratory syncytial virus replication target cotranscriptional mRNA guanylylation by viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Virol. 79, 13105–13115 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hallak, L. K., Spillmann, D., Collins, P. L. & Peeples, M. E. Glycosaminoglycan sulfation requirements for respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Virol. 74, 10508–10513 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malykhina, O., Yednak, M. A., Collins, P. L., Olivo, P. D. & Peeples, M. E. A respiratory syncytial virus replicon that is noncytotoxic and capable of long-term foreign gene expression. J. Virol. 85, 4792–4801 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tiong-Yip, C. L. et al. Development of a high-throughput replicon assay for the identification of respiratory syncytial virus inhibitors. Antivir. Res. 101, 75–81 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tremaglio, C. Z., Noton, S. L., Deflube, L. R. & Fearns, R. Respiratory syncytial virus polymerase can initiate transcription from position 3 of the leader promoter. J. Virol. 87, 3196–3207 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Noton, S. L. & Fearns, R. The first two nucleotides of the respiratory syncytial virus antigenome RNA replication product can be selected independently of the promoter terminus. RNA 17, 1895–1906 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milligan, J. F. & Uhlenbeck, O. C. Synthesis of small RNAs using T7 RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol. 180, 51–62 (1989).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, H. & Krishnamurthy, K. Revisiting the initial rate approximation in kinetic NOE measurements. J. Magn. Reson 182, 173–177 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018).
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, R. Y. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. Elife 5, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17219 (2016).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. Biol. Crystallogr 66, 12–21 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barad, B. A. et al. EMRinger: side chain-directed model and map validation for 3D cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 943–946 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC.
Abel, R., Young, T., Farid, R., Berne, B. J. & Friesner, R. A. Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2817–2831 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Young, T., Abel, R., Kim, B., Berne, B. J. & Friesner, R. A. Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 808–813 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Deval, J. et al. Molecular basis for the selective inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus RNA polymerase by 2’-Fluoro-4’-Chloromethyl-Cytidine triphosphate. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004995 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ogino, M., Gupta, N., Green, T. J. & Ogino, T. A dual-functional priming-capping loop of rhabdoviral RNA polymerases directs terminal de novo initiation and capping intermediate formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 299–309 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Janssen virology and medicinal chemistry teams collaboratively lead to JNJ-8003 discovery. Structural predictions were performed using an internal deployment of AlphaFold2, which was setup and deployed by the In Silico Discovery & External Innovation (ISDEI) team of Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. We thank Dr. Stephen Mason for his critical review of the manuscript and Dr. Patrick Byrne at the University of Texas at Austin for the discussion on the RSV L + P Apo structure. The cryo-EM data were collected at NanoImaging Services (San Diego, CA).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Xiaodi Yu, Pravien Abeywickrema.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Xiaodi Yu, Zhinan Jin.

Authors and Affiliations

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania, PA, 19477, USA
Xiaodi Yu, Pravien Abeywickrema, Suraj Adhikary, Anusarka Bhaumik, Robyn Miller, Aaron Patrick, Madison Piassek & Sujata Sharma
Janssen Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, 2340, Beerse, Belgium
Brecht Bonneux, Suzanne De Bruyn, Nick Verheyen, Nina Ysebaert, Florence Herschke, Dirk Roymans & Peter Rigaux
University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Brecht Bonneux
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA
Ishani Behera, Brandon Anson, Amy Fung, Quyen Pham & Zhinan Jin
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Beerse, Belgium
Edgar Jacoby, Herman Van Vlijmen, Tim H. M. Jonckers & Sandrine Grosse
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Janssen-Cilag, Discovery Chemistry S.A. Río Jarama, 75A, 45007, Toledo, Spain
Rodrigo J. Carbajo
Department of Microbiology, National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
Afzaal Shareef & Rachel Fearns
Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, AFMB, UMR 7257, Marseille, France
Priscila Sutto-Ortiz & Etienne Decroly
Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
Jason S. McLellan

Authors

Xiaodi Yu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pravien Abeywickrema
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brecht Bonneux
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ishani Behera
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brandon Anson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Edgar Jacoby
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Amy Fung
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Suraj Adhikary
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anusarka Bhaumik
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rodrigo J. Carbajo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Suzanne De Bruyn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Robyn Miller
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Aaron Patrick
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Quyen Pham
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Madison Piassek
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nick Verheyen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Afzaal Shareef
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Priscila Sutto-Ortiz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nina Ysebaert
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Herman Van Vlijmen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tim H. M. Jonckers
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Florence Herschke
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jason S. McLellan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Etienne Decroly
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rachel Fearns
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sandrine Grosse
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dirk Roymans
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sujata Sharma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peter Rigaux
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhinan Jin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: P.R., D.R., S.S. and Z.J. Investigation and visualization: X.Y., Z.J., P.A., B.B., I.B., B.A., A.F., E.J., S.A., A.S., P.S-O., A.B., R.J.C, R.M., S.D.B., N.Y., N.V. Writing – Original Draft: X.Y., P.R., E.J. and Z.J. Writing – Reviewing & Editing: X.Y., P.A., B.B., I.B., B.A., A.F., E.J., S.A., A.B., R.J.C, R.M., M.P., Q.P., S.D.B., E.P., N.Y., N.V., H.V.V., T.J., S.M., F.H., J.S.M., E.D., R.F., S.G., D.R., S.S., P.R., and Z.J. Supervision, H.V.V., T.H.M.J., S.M., F.H., J.M., E.D., R.F., S.G., D.R., P.A., S.S., P.R., and Z.J.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaodi Yu or Zhinan Jin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. N.Y., S.D.B., M.P., N.V., A.F., I.B., B.A., Z.J., A.B., A.P., P.A. S.A. X.Y. R.J.C S.G., E.J. S.S., T.J., P.R., N.Y., D.R., and F.H. are employees and possible shareholders of Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. R.F., P.S-O., E.D. and J.S.M. received research funding from Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. During the manuscript preparation, R.F. has a sponsored research agreement with Merck & Co. B.B. is a graduate student from Antwerp University and has received funding from Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine and from the agency Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) for this work.

Peer review

Peer review information

This manuscript has been previously reviewed at another Nature Portfolio journal. The manuscript was considered suitable for publication without further review at Communications Biology.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Supplementary Data 8

Supplementary Data 9

Supplementary Data 10

Supplementary Data 11

Supplementary Data 12

Supplementary Data 13

Supplementary Movie 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, X., Abeywickrema, P., Bonneux, B. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into the inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus polymerase by a non-nucleoside inhibitor. Commun Biol 6, 1074 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05451-4

Download citation

Received: 07 August 2023
Accepted: 11 October 2023
Published: 21 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05451-4

This article is cited by

Structural basis for dimerization of a paramyxovirus polymerase complex
- Jin Xie
- Mohamed Ouizougun-Oubari
- Shuai Chen
Nature Communications (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.