Article | Open | Published:

Nanodiamonds for device applications: An investigation of the properties of boron-doped detonation nanodiamonds

Abstract

The inclusion of boron within nanodiamonds to create semiconducting properties would create a new class of applications in the field of nanodiamond electronics. Theoretical studies have differed in their conclusions as to whether nm-scale NDs would support a stable substitutional boron state, or whether such a state would be unstable, with boron instead aggregating or attaching to edge structures. In the present study detonation-derived NDs with purposefully added boron during the detonation process have been studied with a wide range of experimental techniques. The DNDs are of ~4 nm in size, and have been studied with CL, PL, Raman and IR spectroscopies, AFM and HR-TEM and electrically measured with impedance spectroscopy; it is apparent that the B-DNDs studied here do indeed support substitutional boron species and hence will be acting as semiconducting diamond nanoparticles. Evidence for moderate doping levels in some particles (~1017 B cm−3), is found alongside the observation that some particles are heavily doped (~1020 B cm−3) and likely to be quasi-metallic in character. The current study has therefore shown that substitutional boron doping in nm NDs is in fact possible, opening-up the path to a whole host of new applications for this interesting class of nano-particles.

Introduction

Nanoscale diamonds (NDs) are finding increasing numbers of applications1 in fields as diverse as electronics2, spintronics3, electrochemistry4, biotechnology5 and medicine6, as well as being used as ‘seeds’ during chemical vapour deposition (CVD) of diamond films7. Diamond can be considered as a wide band gap semiconductor (Eg ~ 5.5 eV), which behaves as a dielectric unless purposefully doped. The preeminent technique for the production of NDs is a detonation process8 that typically involves detonating a mixture of TNT and hexogen in an oxygen-deficient environment9. The reaction conditions result in the formation of micron-sized aggregates of nanometre scale diamonds; techniques have been developed10 that enable de-aggregation resulting in individual NDs in the size range 3–10 nm. The surface of detonation synthesised nanodiamonds (DNDs) host a wide range of oxygen and hydrogen based moieties, and can be functionalised with a wide range of chemical groups5. Plasma-enhanced CVD grown diamond is often doped with boron, by the inclusion of boron containing gases to the growth plasma; boron imparts electrical conductivity from p-type character through to semi-metallic behaviour at high concentrations11, and is also associated with superconductivity within diamond films12. Boron-doped NDs (B-NDs) would be an attractive material for many applications including high surface area electrodes for electrochemistry, electrode material within supercapacitors, electro-catalytic material within fuel cells and for nm-scale diamond electronic devices and sensors. Moreover, the widespread use of undoped DNDs as seeds for the subsequent growth of boron-doped diamond films leads to the inevitable introduction of a highly resistive layer between the doped film and the substrate that is deleterious for many applications13; larger B-NDs (rather than nm-scale B-DNDs) have indeed been investigated by others to overcome this problem13,14, but the density of such seeds can never approach that of the density achieved from DNDs.

Attempts to generate boron-doped NDs to date have relied on either the growth of a boron-doped layer over undoped NDs15 or by solid-state diffusion16, but the remaining insulating diamond core leads to a high over all resistivity for the doped material. Heavily boron doped NDs have been produced using a milling process to crush boron-doped CVD grown diamond14, yielding NDs in the size range 10–60 nm. There are currently no reports of the properties of boron doped DNDs, whose ~5 nm size is essential for several applications, where boron-containing material has been purposefully added to the synthesis environment, although a process for doing this has been proposed by Shenderova17. One method involves the introduction of boron containing graphite or boron carbide powders to the combustion mixture prior to detonation. Theoretical predictions for the properties of boron containing NDs with dimensions typical for DNDs vary between the suggestion that they will primarily be located at the surface18, be metastable within the ND core and therefore unstable19 or form a stable substitutional state in the ND core20. This paper reports an experimental investigation into the properties of boron-doped DNDs giving evidence for substitutional doping.

B-DNDs were investigated using AC impedance spectroscopy (IS), which can give insight into the differing electrical conduction processes that are present21. Here the NDs were compacted and IS measurements taken in a ‘sandwich’ configuration. Figure 1(a) shows the real vs imaginary components plotted against each other as a function of measurement frequency – plots at several temperatures are included. These so-called ‘Cole-Cole’ plots should reveal a semicircular response for a given conduction path, which can be modelled as an RC circuit component21. It is clear from Fig. 1(a) that no single semicircular response is apparent. Using established methods for IS curve fitting21 individual semicircular responses can be determined from this data, as shown in Fig. 1(b) for a given temperature. Two distinct semicircular responses can be proposed, one at higher measurement frequencies than the other. R and C values can be determined from the fitted plots assuming two RC circuits exist (one per conduction path) in series. Arrhenius style plots, for the value of resistance (R) plotted as a function of temperature, enable determination of the thermal activation energy for each suggested conduction path to be determined, as shown in Fig. 2. For each of the two semicircles (large and small), two plateaus can be observed, each associated with a conduction path. This suggests the two different activation energies for the conduction processes are apparent; a higher activation energy of Ea = ~0.8 eV at temperatures between 300 °C and 450 °C, and a much lower activation energy Eb = ~0.02 eV below 200 °C.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Cole-Cole plot of impedance measurements between 50 °C and 450 °C, and (b) Two semi-circles fitted to Cole-Cole data at 400 °C.

Figure 2
figure2

Arrhenius plot with linear fitting for the R-values determined from impedance measurements at differing temperatures.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM, tapping mode) was used to identify the average grain size of the DNDs. Using AFM in tapping mode, a laser excites the cantilever near its resonant frequency, and the tip will resonate. Depending on the atomic forces close to the surface, the cantilever’s oscillations will be affected by the van-der-Waals forces, which are dominant up to a few nanometres from the surface. A feedback system keeps the oscillations constant by varying the distance from the surface, hence allowing topographic imaging with sub-nanometre accuracy. This method should allow accurate measurements of heights of single DNDs, but not of their widths parallel to the substrate’s surface. However, given that DNDs are generally symmetric in shape (confirmed using HR-TEM, see below), height measurements should be sufficient to verify their average size. A typical AFM image of DND aggregates deposited onto a SiO2-Si substrate (ultra-sonication from an aqueous solution) is shown in Fig. 3; this image confirms that individual DNDs within the aggregates have diameters within the expected range.

Figure 3
figure3

(a) Atomic force microscopy image of Boron-DND aggregates and individual DNDs on SiO2 and (b) 3D representation of this image.

To verify the atomic structure of the DNDs, High resolution-transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) was used. HR-TEM images of the B-DNDs confirm the crystalline structure of the nanodiamonds, and clearly show diamond cores surrounded by sp2 carbon structures around the cores (Fig. 4). The presence of NDs is clear from the lattice spacing of (111) diamond faces (0.206 nm), shown by the arrow in the figure. Overlapping of DND crystal lattices can also be seen clearly. The lattice spacing increased to 0.213 nm in other locations, possibly indicating the presence of dopants such as Nitrogen and Boron.

Figure 4
figure4

HR-TEM image of DNDs. The arrow is pointing at the (111) diamond lattice lines.

Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive method, which can be used to detect carbon crystal structures and obtain information about their quality and composition, where vibrational modes in Raman active molecules scatter light. Using an excitation wavelength of 532 nm, the obtained spectrum is composed of modes corresponding to sp3 and sp2 bonded structures, as well as Boron content above a minimum concentration22. Typical results are shown in Fig. 5, following fitting and photoluminescence background subtraction23,24. Sample shows prominent features at Raman shifts of about ~1100 cm−1, ~1350 cm−1, and ~1590 cm−1; the peaks correspond to trans-polyacetylene in grain boundaries, the sp2 carbon D peak, and the sp2 carbon G peak respectively25,26. The diamond peak expected at ~1332 cm−1 in bulk material is expected to be upshifted and broadened for nm-scale diamond23. A detailed summary of the observed features and their fitting is in Table 1. Other peaks may also be present, such as the ~1200 cm−1 peak usually present in highly Boron-doped diamond films, which is usually accompanied by a 500 cm−1 peak (Fig. 6); the peaks centred around 500 cm−1 can be used to estimate the substitutional Boron concentration in diamond thin films24.

Figure 5
figure5

Raman spectrum of B-DNDs.

Table 1 Raman spectroscopy features of O-DND sample.
Figure 6
figure6

Fitted Raman spectrum of the 500 cm−1 peaks for the B-DNDs.

To obtain information on the surface composition of our DND samples, ATR and FT-IR spectroscopy, which can measure absorption of infrared light passing through vibrating molecules on the surface were performed. FT-IR measurements used DNDs mixed into KBr pellets, while ATR measurements were made by directly pressing DND powder on top of the ATR crystal. ATR measurements of the as-received DND powder show an abundance of organic groups on the surface (Fig. 7), including a probable signature of boric acid27. This is likely due to surface groups left from the detonation method used to produce the DNDs, and the subsequent (acid based) treatments typically used to purify the material recovered from the detonation chamber28. Prominent features in the FT-IR spectrum, shown in Fig. 8, are a peak at 1630 cm−1 on top of a 1550–1700 cm−1 broad feature, representing the C=C bond stretch, while a smaller feature from ~2850 to about 3000 cm−1 can be attributed to the C–H stretch. A large feature between 3000 and 3650 cm−1 is for the O–H stretch. The ATR spectrum looks similar to the FT-IR spectrum above ~1250 cm−1, but also includes a ~1050–1150 cm−1 C–O stretch peak on top of a broad feature, extending from between 1000 and 1500 cm−1, which could also include the signature for –C–H bending29.

Figure 7
figure7

ATR spectrum of B-DND powder.

Figure 8
figure8

FT-IR spectrum of B-DNDs in a KBr pellet.

Cathodoluminescence (CL) spectra of B-DNDs were taken at a low temperature (95 K) across aggregates, with an electron beam diameter of 20–200 nm. The electron beam provides enough energy to excite an electron to the conduction band, which leaves a hole that luminesces when filled by an electron. Spectra collected around several clusters of agglomerated DNDs showed differing relative sizes of peaks corresponding to both free excitons and boron bound excitons30. Scans were collected around 235 nm where excitonic features are expected. Figure 9(a) shows a HR-TEM image of agglomerated B-DNDs, with Fig. 9(b) showing the corresponding CL image (at 235 ± 5 nm) showing correlation between the two. The free excitons attributed to defects in diamond are expected to be centred ~235 nm compared to those of boron bound excitons at ~238nm30. Whilst this spectral resolution was not possible when using the microscope for imaging, de-focussing enabled the CL intensity to be collected over many aggregates with improved spectral resolution, as shown in Fig. 10. The ratio between the two clearly visible peaks is approximately 1. Another luminescence technique, photoluminescence (PL), was additionally used to measure the response of the DNDs to excitation. Unlike CL, PL measurements are limited by the photon energy of the source, and no features at higher energies can be detected. The PL spectrum obtained using a 405 nm laser shows the presence of three prominent peaks at 435, 469 and 522 nm, as shown in Fig. 11. The peak at 522 nm corresponds to energy of 2.39 eV. The features at wavelengths 435 and 522 nm do not directly correspond to the diamond free excitons and bound boron excitons. However, their presence in CVD diamond materials is usually accompanied by the presence of peaks around 575 and 636 nm, attributed to N-V centres. That these peaks are not seen here indicates that a significant amount of substitutional boron is present, filling up vacancies, thus preventing significant N-V centre formation24. The peak at 469 nm may be explained by the existence of N4 nitrogen centres, which are composed of four substitutional nitrogen atoms surrounding a single vacancy31.

Figure 9
figure9

(a) Deep-field HR-TEM image of B-DND agglomerates and (b) corresponding cathodoluminescence obtained at 235 ± 5 nm wavelength.

Figure 10
figure10

Cathodoluminescence spectrum of B-DNDs.

Figure 11
figure11

Photoluminescence spectrum of B-DNDs seeded on silicon.

Cathodoluminescence measurements have been used extensively to investigate the boron concentration in CVD grown diamond30. From the CL results presented here for B-DNDs it is found that the ratio of free excitons (FE)/ to bound excitons (BE) (5.27 and 5.21 eV respectively) is about 1 in most sampled locations. Taking the methodology used for CVD diamond then implies an average boron concentration of 1–2 × 1017 cm−3 to be present in the B-DNDs measured here32. Although this reasoning was developed for macroscopic CVD grown boron diamond, the fact that the B-DNDs here are agglomerated in clusters of hundreds of nm to a few microns will likely allow the existence of free excitonic features, regardless of the small size of individual DNDs. The result is temperature dependent32, and the spectra were obtained at approximately 95 K. It is important to note that edge emission (free excitons) are expected from (100) growth segments, but not in (111), where impurities like boron and nitrogen are more likely to exist31,32. CL measurements performed here contained contributions from many clusters of B-DNDs given that the electron beam has a diameter of around 200 nm, making the simultaneous observation of emissions from different growth sectors likely. The photoluminescence (PL) feature with the peak at 469 may be explained by the existence of N4 nitrogen centres, which are composed of four substitutional nitrogen atoms surrounding a vacancy31. According to Collins, there is no evidence that this form of nitrogen impurity behaves as a donor in diamond. The 522 nm peak is assigned to the first order (Raman) peak in PL. In lightly boron doped diamond, the first-order Raman peak is usually accompanied by an N-V centre luminescence peak at 636 nm. The suppression of this 636 nm peak in the PL spectrum, has previously been attributed to an increase of boron in the diamond lattice, potentially saturating vacancies in N-V centres33. The 575 nm N-V centre peak is also missing from the B-DND PL spectra recorded here, offering further evidence for the presence of substitutional boron.

The Raman spectrum obtained from B-DND powder confirms the presence of detonation nanodiamonds26, although the peak associated with bulk diamond (1332 cm−1) was not clearly seen, rather a broad peak centred around 1349 cm−1. According to a number of authors, the 1332 cm−1 diamond Raman peak shouldn’t be detected for NDs smaller than 5 nm26,34,35. The rest of the spectrum is mainly composed of two further peaks on top of a broad feature between ~1000 and 1600 cm−1. Carbon sp2 bonds are detected in the form of D (~1345 cm−1) and G (~1580 cm−1) peaks26. The near equivalence of the intensity of the three main peaks suggests an sp2 content of between ~1–2% of total bonds. This is due to the fact that sp2 carbon bonds have a significantly higher Raman efficiency when compared to sp336. The ratio of the D to G peaks increases with decreasing crystal size of graphitic structures36. An additional peak in the Raman spectrum around 560 cm−1 was observed. This could be attributed to the transverse acoustic one-phonon mode seen in nanodiamond-films with sp3 bonded grains smaller than 5 nm37. However, this feature clearly comprises more than one peak, suggesting the boron doping-related feature around ~500 cm−1 may also be present. Heavily boron doped diamond films are known to have features at ~500 cm−1 and ~1220 cm−1. A Lorentzian component of a peak between 460 and 500 cm−1 shifts to lower wavenumbers as boron content increases, while a Gaussian component between 500 and 550 cm−1 can also be fitted, according to May24. If the 435 cm−1 peak is taken to be the Lorentzian component, then a boron concentration of ~7 × 1021 is calculated using Eqn. 1 of May24. However, if the Lorentzian is taken to be the peak at ~554 cm−1, then a boron concentration of ~2 × 1019 can be determined using the same equation. The 1100 cm−1 peak can shift depending on exciting wavelength, and is around 1100 for a 514 nm laser26. According to Ferrari, the 1100 cm−1 peak is due to trans-polyacetylene at grain boundary25,26. The ~1345 cm−1 Raman scattering peak may be attributed to both sp2 amorphous carbon (D peak) and diamond (1332 cm−1)23. A diamond peak can become broad due to the presence of impurities, in addition to strong phonon scattering from NDs20. Using visible excitation, the ~500 and ~1220 cm−1 features are detected in highly boron doped diamond films24. Although 500 cm−1 features are clearly seen, a 1220 cm−1 feature is not clearly obvious, although it could be hidden within the broad feature between 1000 and 1600 cm−1.

The presence of Boron and other dopants in ND cores of some of the nanodiamonds is inferred from the longer C-C bond spacing seen in NDs38, where the bond length increased by about 5 pm. This can also indicate other dopants (N being most likely candidate). Although nanodiamonds are clearly visible in HR-TEM imaging, the distribution of dopants cannot be directly inferred, due to its limited field of view. However, the fact that some regions display the expected longer C-C bond length supports the assertion that at least some of the NDs may have substitutional boron present. Shells surrounding NDs, composed of sp2 structures, are also seen surrounding diamond cores in HR-TEM images.

In the case of IR spectroscopy, Jiang et al. argue that phonon confinement due to the size of individual NDs (<5 nm) hinder the two-phonon process in IR between 1900 and 2500 cm−1. The same confinement effect is also partly responsible for the missing 1332 cm−1 Raman peak in small NDs34. FT-IR spectra of B-DNDs above 1500 cm−1 are nearly identical to spectra obtained from undoped NDs, suggesting similar surface terminations created by the detonation and subsequent cleaning process. The boron characteristic absorption IR line in diamond, at ~1290 cm−1, can be used to estimate the boron content of diamond films39. For a 1 mm thick KBr pellet mixed with Boron DNDs (~10:1 by weight), absorbance of 3% gives a boron content of ~6 × 1017 cm−3, a result close to the estimate from CL peak analysis.

In previous work, aggregated detonation nanodiamonds, without boron doping, have been shown to display only a single semicircular response in Cole-Cole plots determined from impedance spectroscopy40. Indeed, the material showed near-to ideal dielectric behaviour. Similar measurements on mono-dispersed DNDs revealed similar properties41. Therefore, whilst the presence of two conduction paths, indicated from the two semicircular responses in the impedance spectroscopy data (Fig. 1) could be discussed in terms of diamond grain and diamond grain boundary conduction seen in intrinsic42 and boron containing43 nanocrystalline diamond films this is not a likely explanation here. At low temperatures both conduction paths display low activation energies (20–30 meV); whilst moderate boron doping in thin film diamond is associated by an activation energy of 0.37 eV, this value decreases to meV values as the boron doping concentration increases11. Given the TEM observations (some grain doping, some grains with graphitic outershells), with the suggestion from the Raman that at least some material is heavily doped and there is graphitic material present, then the most likely attribution for the two conduction paths at the lower temperatures is due to these two materials-phases. Given one of these is attributed to boron doped DNDs, the activation energy of ~22 meV translates to ~1 × 1020 cm−3 boron content when applying the formula developed by Borst and Weiss11. That CL and PL suggest the presence of lower B-doping would be consistent with these particular grains contributing little to the conduction observed in IS due to their inherently higher activation energy. That the CL and PL techniques do not indicate heavily doped material is not surprising as at high boron levels, B no longer acts as a discrete centre but rather forms an impurity band11 which will not contribute to sharp features in these excitation measurements. The Arrhenius plots (Fig. 2) show that at higher temperatures an increased activation energy (~0.8 eV) is apparent; this has been previously observed in a number of diamond studies, and can be attributed to conduction from deep traps arising from defects within the diamond42.

When the CL, PL, Raman, FTIR and IS observations are combined it can be concluded that the B-DNDs studied here comprise a mixture of grains with varying boron content, likely with un-doped DNDs. The observation of bound excitons is also suggestive for stable substitutional boron doping (although other effects can also cause this). When the information from all techniques is considered together it is clearly indicated that DNDs with boron concentrations in the 1017 cm−3 range exist suggest, and that these NDs will therefore act as semiconductors. In addition, TEM observations of some grains indicated enlarged lattice spacing. This observation supports the theoretical predictions of Barnard and Sternberg20, but disagree with some others. That a conduction path most likely attributed to a highly boron doped ND, also suggested by Raman measurements, suggest other grains display quasi-metallic behaviour typical of diamond with a boron impurity band11, which again supports the assertion that NDs with a size <5 nm are capable of supporting substitutional boron, rather than it forming clusters or simply existing on grain edges18,19.

Nanodiamonds are an important class of nanocarbons for many applications, with NDs produced by a detonation process being unique in offering access to the sub-5nm particle size. The inclusion of boron within nanodiamonds to create semiconducting properties would create a new class of applications in the field of nanodiamond electronics, but to date examples of boron doped NDs are principally limited to ‘crushed’ and milled CVD diamond films17, such materials do not offer low-nm sizes and the properties that are associated with this scale, although a recent report on a high-pressure high temperature method for nm-scale NDs from an organic precursor is encouraging44. Theoretical studies have differed in their conclusions as to whether sub-5nm NDs would support a stable substitutional boron state, offering semiconducting properties, or whether such a state would be unstable, with boron instead aggregating or attaching to edge structures18,19,20. In the present study detonation-derived NDs with purposefully added boron during the detonation process have been studied with a wide range of experimental techniques. The individual DNDs are of ~4 nm in size, and have been studied with CL, PL, Raman and IR spectroscopies, AFM and HR-TEM as well as electrically measured through the use of impedance spectroscopy. When the results from these differing techniques are combined it is apparent that the B-DNDs studied here do indeed support substitutional boron species and hence will be acting as semiconducting diamond nanoparticles. Evidence for moderate doping levels in some particles (~1017 B cm−3), is found alongside the observation that some particles are heavily doped (~1020 B cm−3) and likely to be quasi-metallic in character. Whilst further B-DND research is required to generate a more homogeneous distribution of doping concentration, the current study has shown that substitutional boron doping in sub-nm NDs is in fact possible, opening up the path to a whole host of new applications for this interesting class of nano-particles.

Methods

Detonation Nanodiamond

Boron-included DNDs were sourced from SkySpring Nanomaterials, and classified according to the data-sheet as 3–4 nm in size. The dry powder was placed in DI water at a concentration of 0.05 g/l, then ultra-sonicated on 40% power for 5 hours (Sonics Vibracell VCX 500; 500 W, 20 kHz). The solution was used to seed the DNDs on either RCA cleaned silicon substrates or H-terminated silicon substrates (microwave hydrogen plasma, Seki Technotron, AX1010, 1 kW, 20 mbar, 800 C, 20 minutes). Seeding was by immersion in an ultra-sonic bath for 3 minutes. In other cases the dry powder was used to create solid round pellets (11 mm diameter, 3 mm thick) using a mechanical press (10 T weight).

DND treatments

“As-received” B-DNDs were treated with ozone to produce O-terminated DNDs (ozone, 50 mbar, 200 C, 3 hours) or hydrogen to generate H-terminated DNDs (H2 atmosphere at 10 mbar, 700 C, 5 hours).

Characterization

Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One instrument that could be fitted with an ATR accessory. All experiments were preformed in a dry nitrogen atmosphere. Transmission FTIR involved mixing DNDs with KBr and pressing a pellet as described above. In the case of ATR-FTIR and thin layer of DNDs was deposited by sonication on CaF2 IR windows. Impedance Spectroscopy (IS) was performed in a stainless steel vacuum vessel in the temperature range 20–500 C, over the frequency range 0.1 Hz-10 MHz (Solartron 1260 Impedance system with Solartron 1296 Dielectric Interface). In a typical IS analysis, impedance is measured as a function of frequency, and the real component plotted against the imaginary component as the frequency is changed. These so-called ‘Cole-Cole’ plots may then reveal differing semicircular responses for each RC component of the film; repeating the measurements at differing temperatures enables the activation energy for each component to be determined. High resolution TEM was performed using a Joel-2100 instrument (200 kV); DND solutions were used to attach DNDs to 3 mm carbon coated Cu TEM grids by sonication. The HR-TEM used is capable of resolving lattice spacing as small as 0.14 nm. The same instrument was used for cathodoluminescence (CL) at low temperature (95 K) and beam energy (100 kV). AFM measurements (Bruker Icon, tapping mode) were performed on DND seeded Si substrates. Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw Invia, 532 nm, 150 mW) was used to reveal peaks characteristic of diamond and graphite phases.

References

  1. 1.

    Holt, K. B. Diamond at the Nanoscale: Applications of Diamond Nanoparticles from Cellular Biomarkers to Quantum Computing. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 2845–2861 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Terranova, M. L., Orlanducci, S., Rossi, M. & Tamburri, E. Nanodiamonds for Field Emission: State of the Art. Nanoscale 7, 5094–5114 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Laraoui, A., Hodges, J. S. & Meriles, C. A. Nitrogen-Vacancy-Assisted Magnetometry of Paramagnetic Centers in an Individual Diamond Nanocrystal. Nano Lett. 12, 3477–3482 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Holt, K. B., Caruana, D. J. & Millán-Barrios, E. J. Electrochemistry of Undoped Diamond Nanoparticles: Accessing Surface Redox States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11272–11273 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Krueger, A. Diamond Nanoparticles: Jewels for Chemistry and Physics. Adv. Mater. 20, 2445–2449 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Xing, Y. & Dai, L. Nanodiamonds for Nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 4, 207–218 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Williams, O. A. et al. Enhanced Diamond Nucleation on Monodispersed Nanocrystalline Diamond. Chem. Phys. Lett. 445, 255–258 (2007).

  8. 8.

    Mochalin, V. N., Shenderova, O., Ho, D. & Gogotsi, Y. The Properties and Applications of Nanodiamonds. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 11–23 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Voznyakovskii, A. P., Dolmatov, V. Y. & Shumilov, F. A. The Influence of Detonation Synthesis Conditions on Surface Properties of Detonation Nanodiamonds. J. Superhard Mater. 36, 165–170 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Krüger, A. et al. Unusually Tight Aggregation in Detonation Nanodiamond: Identification and Disintegration. Carbon 43, 1722–1730 (2005).

  11. 11.

    Borst, T. H. & Weis, O. Boron-Doped Homoepitaxial Diamond Layers: Fabrication, Characterization, and Electronic Applications. Phys. Status Solidi 154, 423–444 (1996).

  12. 12.

    Ekimov, E. A. et al. Superconductivity in Diamond. Nature 428, 542–545 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Tsigkourakos, M., Hantschel, T., Bangerter, C. & Vandervorst, W. Electrical Probing of B-Doped Diamond Seeds Embedded into the Interfacial Layer of a Conductive Diamond Film. Phys. Status Solidi 211, 2284–2289 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Heyer, S. et al. Toward Deep Blue Nano Hope Diamonds: Heavily Boron-Doped Diamond Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 5757–5764 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Fischer, A. E. & Swain, G. M. Preparation and Characterization of Boron-Doped Diamond Powder - A Possible Dimensionally Stable Electrocatalyst Support Material. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, B369–B375 (2005).

  16. 16.

    Cunci, L. & Cabrera, C. R. Preparation and Electrochemistry of Boron-Doped Diamond Nanoparticles on Glassy Carbon Electrodes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 14, K17 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Shenderova, O. Production of Conductive Nanodiamond by Dynamic Synthesis Approaches. United States Patent, US 8728429 B2 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Barnard, A. S. & Sternberg, M. Substitutional Boron in Nanodiamond, Bucky-Diamond, and Nanocrystalline Diamond Grain Boundaries. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 19307–19314 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Barnard, A. S. & Sternberg, M. Can We Predict the Location of Impurities in Diamond Nanoparticles? Diam. Relat. Mater. 16, 2078–2082 (2007).

  20. 20.

    Wang, J., Ma, L. & Zhao, J. First-principles Study of Nanodiamond Doped with B and N. International Journal of Modern Physics B 24, 6099–6106 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Barsoukov, E., Macdonald, J. R. Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications, 2n d Edn; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, N.J. (2005).

  22. 22.

    Bernard, M., Deneuville, A. & Muret, P. Non-Destructive Determination of the Boron Concentration of Heavily Doped Metallic Diamond Thin Films from Raman Spectroscopy. Diam. Relat. Mater. 13, 282–286 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Prawer, S. & Nemanich, R. J. Raman Spectroscopy of Diamond and Doped Diamond. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 362, 2537–2565 (2004).

  24. 24.

    May, P. W. et al. Raman and Conductivity Studies of Boron-Doped Microcrystalline Diamond, Facetted Nanocrystalline Diamond and Cauliflower Diamond Films. Diam. Relat. Mater. 17, 105–117 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Ferrari, A. & Robertson, J. Origin of the 1150 cm−1 Raman Mode in Nanocrystalline Diamond. Phys. Rev. B 63, 2–5 (2001).

  26. 26.

    Ferrari, A. C. & Robertson, J. Raman Spectroscopy of Amorphous, Nanostructured, Diamond-likeCarbon, and Nanodiamond. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 362, 2477–2512 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Linstrom, P. J., Mallard, W. G. NIST Chemistry WebBook http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/.

  28. 28.

    Dolmatov, V. Y. Detonation-Synthesis Nanodiamonds: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications. Russ. Chem. Rev. 76, 339–360 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Hanson, J., IR Absorption http://www2.ups.edu/faculty/hanson/Spectroscopy/IR/IRfrequencies.html.

  30. 30.

    Kawarada, H. et al. Excitonic Recombination Radiation in Undoped and Boron-Doped Chemical-Vapor-Deposited Diamonds. Phys. Rev. B 47, 3663 (1993).

  31. 31.

    Collins, A. T. The Characterisation of Point Defects in Diamond by Luminescence Spectroscopy. Diam. Relat. Mater. 1, 457–469 (1992).

  32. 32.

    Kawarada, H., Yokota, Y., Mori, Y., Nishimura, K. & Hiraki, A. Cathodoluminescence and Electroluminescence of Undoped and Boron-Doped Diamond Formed by Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 67, 983–989 (1990).

  33. 33.

    Freitas, J. A., Doverspike, K. & Klein, P. B. Luminescence Studies of Nitrogen- and Boron-Doped Diamond Films 3, 821–824 (1994).

  34. 34.

    Jiang, T., Xu, K. & Jib, S. FTIR Studies on the Spectral Changes of the Surface Functional Groups of Ultradispersed Diamond Powder Synthesized by Explosive Detonation after Treatment in Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Methane and Air at Different Temperatures. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 3401–3406 (1996).

  35. 35.

    Yoshikawa, M. et al. Raman Scattering from Diamond Particles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 3114–3116 (1993).

  36. 36.

    Wada, N., Gaczl, P. J. & Solin, S. A. ‘Diamond-Like’ 3-Fold Coordinated Amorphous Carbon. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 36, 543–548 (1980).

  37. 37.

    Obraztsova, E. D. et al. Raman and Photoluminescence Investigations of Nanograined Diamond Films. Nanostructured Mater. 6, 827–830 (1995).

  38. 38.

    Lu, Y. G. et al. Local Bond Length Variations in Boron-Doped Nanocrystalline Diamond Measured by Spatially Resolved Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 032105 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Karna, S. K., Vohra, Y. K. & Weir, S. T. Optical and Electrical Characterization of Boron-DopedDiamond. MRS Proceedings 1519, mrsf12-1519–mm03-27 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Bevilacqua, M., Patel, S., Chaudhary, A., Ye, H. & Jackman, R. B. Electrical Properties of Aggregated Detonation Nanodiamonds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 1–3 (2008).

  41. 41.

    Chaudhary, A., Welch, J. O. & Jackman, R. B. Electrical Properties of Monodispersed Detonation Nanodiamonds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 2008–2011 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Ye, H., Jackman, R. B. & Hing, P. Spectroscopic Impedance Study of Nanocrystalline Diamond Films. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7878–7882 (2003).

  43. 43.

    Bevilacqua, M. et al. Nanocrystalline Diamond as an Electronic Material: An Impedance Spectroscopic and Hall Effect Measurement Study. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 0033716 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Ekimov, E. A., Kudryavtsev, O. S., Khomich, A. A., Dolenko, T. A. & Vlasov, I. High-Pressure Synthesis of Boron-Doped Ultrasmall Diamonds from an Organic Compound. Adv. Mat. 27, 5518–5522 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work received some financial support from a EU F7 project ‘NEUROCARE’ (number 280433-2) and was partially supported by the UKs Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, EP/F026110/1).

Author information

R.B.J. conceived the activity, supervised it and drafted the paper with A.A. who performed the measurements and analysed the data. A.H. and I.W.B. carried out HR-TEM, C.L. and Raman measurements and analysis with A.A.

Correspondence to Richard B. Jackman.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.