Abstract
The Japanese sawyer beetle, Monochamus alternatus, is not only one of the most important wood boring pest itself, but also a major vector of the invasive pinewood nematode (PWN), which is the causal agent of the devastative pine wilt disease (PWD) and threats the global pine forest. Here, we present a near-complete genome of M. alternatus at the chromosome level. The assembled genome was 792.05 Mb with contig N50 length of 55.99 Mb, which is the largest N50 size among the sequenced Coleoptera insects currently. 99.57% of sequence was anchored onto ten pseudochromosomes (one X-chromosome and nine autosomes), and the final genome harbored only 13 gaps. BUSCO evaluation revealed the presence of 99.0% of complete core genes. Thus, our genome assembly represented the highest-contiguity genome assembly as well as high completeness in insects so far. We identified 20,471 protein-coding genes, of which 20,070 (98.04%) were functionally annotated. The genome assembly of M. alternatus provides a valuable resource for exploring the evolution of the symbiosis between PWN and the vector insects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
Vector-borne plant diseases widely occur and cause severe ecological and economic losses in agricultural and forestry ecosystem. Vector insects play particularly important roles in the evolution of the pathogen dispersion and pathogenesis1. The plant parasitic nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, also known as pine wood nematode (PWN), is the causal agent of the devastative pine wilt disease (PWD) and threats the global pine forest2,3. The transmission of PWN from dead pine trees to susceptible, live pine trees exclusively relied on the vector beetles belonging to species of the genus Monochamus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)4. During the invasion history of PWN, its vector species also shifted with the geographic locations. The primary vector in North America, native region of PWN, is Monochamus carolinensis, then changed to M. alternatus and M. salturatis in Asia and M. galloprovincialis in Europe, the invasive regions of PWN5. The vector species shift thus greatly contributes to the evolutionary ecology of PWD6. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is still far unknown due to few genomic resources of these vector insects7,8.
The Japanese swayer beetle, M. alternatus, is not only a main vector of the invasive PWN, but also one of the most important wood boring pest itself across East Asia such as China, South Korea and Japan, where is the place with the most serious PWD epidemic damage9,10,11. This vector beetle and PWN has formed a close symbiosis based on their high synchronization of life cycle, mediated by the chemical signals11,12,13. Specifically, the M. alternatus beetles prefer to select the weakened or dying trees with PWN infection to oviposit and complete the development of their offspring. The third-stage juveniles (LIII) of PWN are attracted by specific terpenes produced by mature insect larvae and aggregate around pupal chambers in diseased trees12, and fourth-stage juveniles (LIV) are attracted into the trachea of newly emerged adults by ascarosides secreted by the beetles13. The newly eclosed beetle should have a maturation feeding in healthy trees. The nematode then departs from the spiracles driven by CO2 enhanced by feeding behavior and invades new healthy trees via the feeding wounds14,15, thus starting a new cycle of infection, propagation and dispersal. While the chemical signals among the symbiosis have been well characterized, the molecular mechanism of the chemical communications remains elusive. Furthermore, as with most vector-borne diseases, vector control is the key to manage those diseases efficiently. Unfortunately, there is still lack of effective and efficient control method against this vector beetle, therefore, a high-quality reference genome is needed for both further understanding this symbiosis and its maintenance as well as new control approaches, such as genetic-engineered management strategy.
Recently, Gao et al. reported a chromosome-level genome assembly of M. alternatus based on Nanopore sequencing technology8. Here, we constructed a high-quality chromosome-scale genome of M. alternatus through combining Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) high-fidelity (HiFi), high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and Illumina short-read sequencing data. Subsequently, we performed structural and functional annotation of the assembled genome through integrating transcriptome data from different tissues of M. alternatus. The high-quality reference genome of M. alternatus provides a valuable resource for exploring the evolution of coleopteran insects and the interaction mechanism between PWN and its vector insects.
A total of 99.27 Gb (127.81×) of HiFi reads (Table 1) were used to generate the primary genome assembly. Furthermore, 145.39 Gb (187.19×) of Hi-C data (Table 1) was used to anchor contigs to chromosome-level genome using the juicer and 3D-DNA pipeline. The final assembled genome is 792.5 Mb, which was very close to the estimated genome size (776.7 Mb) (Fig. 1a; Table 2) based on the distribution of k-mer frequencies, with a contig N50 size of 55.99 Mb and a scaffold N50 size of 86.21 Mb. Based on Hi-C data, 99.57% of genome sequence was successfully anchored onto ten pseudochromosomes (Fig. 1b). Realignment of Illumina genome sequencing and RNA-seq reads to the reference genome achieved average mapping rates of 98.32% and 95.53% (Table S1), respectively. MUMmer-based genome alignment indicated that our genome assembly exhibited 1:1 synteny relationship with the closely related species M. saltuarius (Fig. S1), and chromosome 7 of M. alternatus was determined as the X chromosome based on chromosomal synteny. BUSCO v5.2.216 was used to evaluate the completeness of the genome assembly of M. alternatus based on the insect_odb10 dataset. The results showed that 99.0% of complete BUSCOs were successfully captured by our genome assembly, including 98.3% of single-copy and 0.7% of duplicated BUSCOs (Table 2).
Additionally, we made a comparison of contig size between M. alternatus and other coleopteran insects with publicly available genome assemblies in NCBI database. Compared with 116 other chromosome-level genome assemblies of Coleoptera insects, the genome assembly of M. alternatus showed the highest quality among the coleopteran insects at least in terms of contig N50 size (Fig. 2a; Table S2). Tree map representation was utilized to display contig size and gap number for each chromosome (Fig. 2b), indicating that four chromosomes (i.e. chr1, chr5, chr6, and chr8) were gap-free and the remaining six chromosomes harbored no more than three gaps for each. Moreover, we examined whether telomeres and centromeres were present in our assembled genome. The results showed that telomeric regions could be detected on both ends of nine chromosomes, and the telomeric region was identified on the single end of chromosome 7 (Fig. 2c; Table S3). As with centromeres, one candidate centromeric region was identified for each of ten chromosomes (Fig. 2c; Table S4). Together, we obtained a high-quality genome assembly of M. alternatus with high contiguity and high completeness.
Besides, we made a comparison of quality metrics between two genome assemblies generated by PacBio HiFi (hereafter referred to as HiFi assembly) and Nanopore sequencing technologies (hereafter referred to as Nanopore assembly). Firstly, we recalculated the N50 metrics of scaffold-level and contig-level genome using the same software assembly-stats to exclude the bias caused by different approaches. The HiFi assembly possessed higher quality in contig N50 size (55.99 Mb) compared with the Nanopore assembly (15.77 Mb) (Table S5). Secondly, significant difference existed between two assemblies in terms of the HiC interaction heatmap. Dozens of gaps (72) were detected in the Nanopore assembly8, while less gaps (13) were found in the HiFi assembly (Fig. 1b). Thirdly, the HiFi assembly (99.57%) possessed higher chromosome anchoring rate compared with the Nanopore assembly (Table S5). Fourthly, the Nanopore assembly showed higher genome BUSCO score, while the HiFi assembly showed higher gene set BUSCO score (Table S5). Fifthly, the HiFi assembly showed higher mapping rates against all RNA-seq samples generated by two studies (Table S1). Finally, telomeres were undetectable in all chromosomes of the Nanopore assembly based on the monomer ‘TTAGG/CCTAA’, while telomeres were present in both ends of nine chromosomes and single end of the remaining one of the HiFi assembly (Table S5). Thus, the HiFi assembly showed advancement in contiguity compared with the Nanopore assembly, representing a near telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assembly of M. alternatus.
The repeat sequences in M. alternatus were annotated using the RepeatMasker pipeline. In total, 58.23% of the M. alternatus genome was composed of repeat sequences. Among them, DNA transposons (35.81%) and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs, 9.45%) represent top two richest repeat types, and long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs), Penelope and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) occupied 7.88%, 0.63% and 0.15% of genome sequence (Table 3). Based on the masked genome, we predicted protein-coding genes through combining three approaches, finally yielding 20,471 consensus protein coding genes (Table 2). BUSCO assessment showed that 97.6% of complete BUSCOs were present in the predicted gene set. Additionally, the canonical non-coding RNAs in M. alternatus were identified using different methods, including 1384 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), 540 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), 67 microRNAs (miRNAs), and 77 small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) (Table 4). The landscape of M. alternatus genome assembly and gene annotations was presented as a Circos plot (Fig. 3). The functions of protein-coding genes were annotated against multiple database, such as SwissProt, InterPro, Pfam, Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The results indicated that 98.04% of coding genes could be functionally annotated by at least one public database and transcriptome (Table 5), suggesting the high confidence of our gene annotation.
We selected thirteen coleopteran insect species to perform phylogenomic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed from 680 strict single-copy orthologous genes using OrthoFinder. The results indicated that M. alternatus was most closely related to the Asian longhorned beetle Anoplophora glabripennis, and they diverged from each other approximately 25 million years ago (Mya) (Fig. 4a). CAFÉ analysis indicated that 759 gene families were significantly expanded in M. alternatus compared to the most recent common ancestor (Fig. 4a). We made a comparison of gene families across seven Coleoptera insects, and found that 5441 orthogroups (OGs) were highly conserved in these beetles, and 392 OGs were species-specific in M. alternatus (Fig. 4b). Functional enrichment analysis showed that the expanded gene families in M. alternatus were significantly enriched in many physiological processes, such as transcription factors (K09427; BH-adjusted p-value = 1.43 × 10−12), membrane trafficking (K21440; BH-adjusted p-value = 1.89 × 10−9), Toll and Imd signaling pathway (K20674; BH-adjusted p-value = 4.23 × 10−5), apoptosis (K20015; BH-adjusted p-value = 1.22 × 10−7), and insect hormone biosynthesis (K10719; BH-adjusted p-value = 3.99 × 10−9) (Fig. 4c).
Methods
Insect rearing, sample collection, and genome sequencing
Last instar larval M. alternatus were collected from host trees of Pinus massoniana, in Fuyang, Zhejiang province in late autumn in 2016. They were reared for approximately twenty generations in laboratory. The larva and pupa were fed on artificial diet in a 10-ml tube at a 12:12 h light:dark (L:D) cycle at 25 °C placed in a climate chamber. Fresh diet was provided every week3. The adults were fed on the fresh pine branches for sexual maturation and laid eggs under the back of pine logs (6–10 cm in diameter and 30 cm in length). One week later, the logs were debarked and the hatched larva were collected for next generation rearing. One newly emerged adult male without feeding was prepared for PacBio HiFi sequencing and Hi-C sequencing. The beetle’s gut was removed and body surface was cleaned by 75% ethanol to avoid microbial contamination.
Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) was used to estimate the genomic characteristics of M. alternatus. Illumina paired-end library was constructed and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. A total of 43.05 Gb of clean data was generated (Table 1).
Genomic DNA for PacBio HiFi sequencing was prepared by the CTAB method and followed by purification with QIAGEN Blood & Cell Culture DNA Midi Kit (QIAGEN, USA) according to the manufactural procedure. The library was constructed Sequel II HiFi (CCS) method. SMRTbell target size libraries were constructed for sequencing according to the standard protocol of PacBio (Pacific Biosciences, CA USA) using 15 kb preparation solutions, and sequenced on PacBio Sequel II platform with Sequencing Primer V2 and Sequel II Binding Kit 2.0 in Grandomics Biosciences Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).
To anchor hybrid scaffolds onto the chromosome, genomic DNA was extracted for the Hi-C library from the same beetle as HiFi. Then, we constructed the Hi-C library and obtained sequencing data via the Illumina DNBSEQ-T7 platform in Grandomics Biosciences Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).
For transcriptome sequencing, the total RNA of each sample from development stage (egg, late larvae and early pupae) or adult tissue (gut, muscle, brain and trachea) was extracted using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Paired-end libraries were constructed NEBNext®Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®(NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations. The library preparations were then paired-end sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq. 2500 platform. A total of 45.04 Gb of data was generated.
Genome assembly and quality evaluation
To examine the genome feature of M. alternatus, GCE v1.0.217 was used for k-mer frequency analysis with default parameters. To achieve high-quality genome assembly, Hifiasm (v0.16.1-r375)18 was used to de novo assemble the M. alternatus genome based on PacBio HiFi reads with default parameters. Then, the Hi-C reads were employed to scaffold contigs onto chromosomes through sorting, orientation, and ordering using Juicer v1.619 and 3D-DNA v17012320 to generate the final version of genome assembly. Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO v5.2.2)16 was performed to assess the quality of the genome assembly using the insecta_odb10 dataset.
Identification of telomeres and centromeres
Both telomeres and centromeres were identified using quarTeT21. Telomeres were predicted using quarTeT TeloExplorer module with the parameters: ‘-c other -m 100’. Centromeres were predicted using quarTeT CentroMiner module with the parameters: ‘-n 100 -m 200 -s 0.8 -d 10 -e 0.00001 -g 50000 -i 100000 –trf 2 7 7 80 10 50 -r 3’. The chromosomal distribution of telomeres and centromeres was visualized using the R package chromoMap v4.1.1222.
Chromosomal synteny analysis and identification of sex chromosomes
The whole-genome synteny analysis between M. alternatus and the closely related species M. saltuarius was performed using MUMmer v4.0.0beta223 with default parameters. The chromosome that was syntenic with chrX in M. saltuarius was defined as the X chromosome in M. alternatus.
Repeat sequence and non-coding RNA annotation
Firstly, a de novo repeat library was constructed by combining RepeatModeler v1.0.11 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler) with LTR_retriever v2.9.024, which integrates the LTR discovery result from LTR_finder v1.0.725 and LTRharvest v1.5.926. TRF v4.10.027 was used for identification of tandem repeats. Then, the repeat sequences in the M. alternatus genome was identified and masked using RepeatMasker v4.0.7 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatMasker) against the species-specific de novo repeat library and RepBase library v26.03. Additionally, tRNAscan-SE28 was used to predict tRNA genes. Other non-coding RNAs such as rRNA, miRNA, and snRNA were annotated using INFERNAL v1.129 through search against the Rfam database v9.130.
Gene prediction and functional annotation
To predict the protein-coding genes in the M. alternatus genome, we employed a strategy integrating ab initio prediction, homology searching and transcriptome-based approaches. For transcriptome-based prediction, HISAT v2.2.131 was used to align the RNA-seq data to the reference genome, and StringTie v2.1.631 was used for transcript assembly. Subsequently, TransDecoder v5.5.0 (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder) was employed to estimate the potential open reading frames (ORFs). For the homology-based approaches, the protein sequences from seven Coleoptera insects and Drosophila melanogaster were downloaded from public database and GenomeThreader v1.7.132 was used for homology search. For ab initio prediction, AUGUSTUS v3.4.033 was employed for gene prediction based on the species-specific gene model. Finally, the EVidenceModeler pipeline34 was employed to generate a set of protein-coding genes through combining different sources of evidence. To maintain the confidence of predicted genes, we retained only gene models that had at least one supporting evidence from homologous proteins of closely related species, InterProScan domain and RNA-seq data. For functional annotation, we searched against the SwissProt protein database and InterPro database using DIAMOND v2.1.718 (E-value = 1e-5) and InterProScan v5.21.6035, respectively. The assignment of KEGG orthology (KO) terms was conducted through search against the hidden Markov model (KOfam) database using KofamScan v1.3.036 with default parameters.
Reconstruction of phylogenetic tree of Coleoptera insect species
To perform phylogenomic analysis, the genome assemblies and gene annotations of thirteen Coleoptera insects and an outgroup D. melanogaster were retrieved from several public database, such as A. glabripennis (EnsemblMetazoa: Agla_1.0.48)37, Aethina tumida (NCBI RefSeq: GCF_024364675.1)38, Altica viridicyanea (NGDC GWH: GWHAMMQ00000000)39, Callosobruchus maculatus (NCBI GenBank: GCA_900659725.1)40, Dendroctonus ponderosae (NCBI GenBank: GCA_020466635.2)41, Dendroctonus valens42, Diabrotica virgifera (NCBI RefSeq: GCF_003013835.1)43, Gonioctena quinquepunctata (NCBI GenBank: GCA_018342105.1)44, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (i5k: OGSv1.2_GCF_000500325)45, Nebria riversi46, Photinus pyralis (NCBI RefSeq: GCF_008802855.1)47, Sitophilus oryzae (NCBI RefSeq: GCF_002938485.1)48, and Tribolium castaneum (EnsemblMetazoa: Tcas5.2.48)49. For each gene, only the longest transcript was kept for downstream analysis. OrthoFinder v2.5.450 was performed to identify orthologs and paralogs using DIAMOND v2.1.7 with default parameters. To infer the phylogeny of these insects, multiple sequence alignments of single-copy orthologous genes were performed using MAFFT v7.49051 with default parameters. The alignment results were concatenated to form a super-sequence for each species and trimmed using trimAl v1.252 with the “-gappyout” parameter. The optimal amino acid substitution model was estimated using ProtTest v3.4.253. Then, RAxML v8.2.1054 was employed to construct the phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method with LG + I + G + F model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Species divergence age was adopted from the TimeTree55 database: D. valens vs D. ponderosae 21.6 Mya; C. maculatus vs D. virgifera 79–221 Mya; T. castaneum vs D. melanogaster 195–361.6 Mya; and A. glabripennis vs L. decemlineata 89.7–220.9 Mya. R8s v1.8156 was used for calibrating the species divergence time. The species tree was visualized using FigTree v1.4.2.
Gene family expansion and contraction
The count matrix of gene family for each species was obtained from OrthoFinder analysis. The matrix table and the ultrametric tree were taken as inputs to analyze the expansion and contraction of gene families using CAFE v4.2.157.
Data Records
Raw data from PacBio HiFi (CRR1002983)58, Hi-C (CRR1002984)59 and Illumina (CRR1002982)60 genome sequencing and RNA-seq data (CRR1003137-CRR1003143)61,62,63,64,65,66,67 have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa) at the National Genomic Data Center (NGDC)68. The genome assembly has been deposited in the Genome Warehouse (GWH, https://ngdc.cndb.ac.cn/gwh)69 at NGDC under the accession number of GWHEQWP00000000. All data were associated with the BioProject PRJCA022378. The genome sequence and raw reads have also been deposited in GenBank (JBBBDW000000000.170) and Sequence Read Archive (SRA, SRR2824870271 for PacBio HiFi, SRR2824870172 for Hi-C, SRR2824870373 for Illumina, and SRR28248694-SRR2824870074,75,76,77,78,79,80 for RNA-seq data) at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject PRJNA1084890.
Technical Validation
Two distinct methods were employed to assess the completeness and accuracy of the M. alternatus genome. First, employing the insecta_odb10 datasets, the BUSCO analysis demonstrated successful identification of 99.0% of core genes as complete. Second, the realignment of Illumina genome sequencing and RNA-seq reads to the M. alternatus genome resulted in mapping rates of 98.32% and 95.53%, respectively. To further appraise the comprehensiveness and accuracy of gene prediction, BUSCO analysis was conducted based on the Insecta datasets, yielding a complete BUSCO score of 97.6%.
Code availability
No specific script was utilized in this study. The codes and pipelines used for genome sequencing data analysis were performed following the instructions of corresponding bioinformatics tools. The version and parameters of the software have been included in the Methods section.
References
Eigenbrode, S. D., Bosque-Perez, N. A. & Davis, T. S. Insect-Borne Plant Pathogens and Their Vectors: Ecology, Evolution, and Complex Interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 63, 169–191 (2018).
Zhou, J. et al. Immune tolerance of vector beetle to its partner plant parasitic nematode modulated by its insect parasitic nematode. FASEB J 32, 4862–4877 (2018).
Zhang, B. et al. miR-31-5p regulates cold acclimation of the wood-boring beetle Monochamus alternatus via ascaroside signaling. BMC Biol 18, 184 (2020).
Linit, M. J. Nematode-vector relationships in the pine wilt disease system. Journal of Nematology 20, 227–235 (1988).
Akbulut, S. & Stamps, W. T. Insect vectors of the pinewood nematode: a review of the biology and ecology of Monochamus species. Forest Pathology 42, 89–99 (2011).
Kirino, H., Maehara, N. & Shinya, R. How did Bursaphelenchus nematodes acquire a specific relationship with their beetle vectors. Monochamus? Front Physiol 14, 1209695 (2023).
Fu, N. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Monochamus saltuarius reveals its adaptation and interaction mechanism with pine wood nematode. Int J Biol Macromol 222, 325–336 (2022).
Gao, Y. F. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the Japanese sawyer beetle Monochamus alternatus. Sci Data 11, 199 (2024).
Kobayashi, F., Yamane, A. & Ikeda, T. The Japanese pine sawyer beetle as the vector of pine wilt disease. Annu Rev Entomol 29, 115–135 (1984).
Futai, K. Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annu Rev Phytopathol 51, 61–83 (2013).
Zhao, L., Mota, M., Vieira, P., Butcher, R. A. & Sun, J. Interspecific communication between pinewood nematode, its insect vector, and associated microbes. Trends Parasitol 30, 299–308 (2014).
Zhao, L. et al. Chemical signals synchronize the life cycles of a plant-parasitic nematode and its vector beetle. Curr Biol 23, 2038–2043 (2013).
Zhao, L. et al. Ascarosides coordinate the dispersal of a plant-parasitic nematode with the metamorphosis of its vector beetle. Nat Commun 7, 12341 (2016).
Zhang, B. et al. Chemical signals of vector beetle facilitate the prevalence of a native fungus and the invasive pinewood nematode. Journal of Nematology 49, 341–347 (2017).
Wu, Y., Wickham, J. D., Zhao, L. & Sun, J. CO2 drives the pine wood nematode off its insect vector. Curr Biol 29, R619–R620 (2019).
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simao, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: Novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4647–4654 (2021).
Liu, B. et al. Estimation of genomic characteristics by analyzing k-mer frequency in de novo genome projects. arXiv (2013).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo asssembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).
Lin, Y. et al. quarTeT: a telomere-to-telomere toolkit for gap-free genome assembly and centromeric repeat identification. Hortic. Res. 10, uhad127 (2023).
Anand, L. & Rodriguez Lopez, C. M. ChromoMap: an R package for interactive visualization of multi-omics data and annotation of chromosomes. BMC bioinformatics 23, 33 (2022).
Marcais, G. et al. MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol 14, e1005944 (2018).
Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: A highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176, 1410–1422 (2018).
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).
Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC bioinformatics 9, 18 (2008).
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).
Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997).
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
Kalvari, I. et al. Non-coding RNA analysis using the Rfam database. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 62, e51 (2018).
Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1650–1667 (2016).
Gremme, G., Brendel, V., Sparks, M. E. & Kurtz, S. Engineering a software tool for gene structure prediction in higher organisms. Inform. Software Tech. 47, 965–978 (2005).
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
Philip, J. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics, 1236-1240 (2014).
Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).
McKenna, D. D. et al. Genome of the Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis), a globally significant invasive species, reveals key functional and evolutionary innovations at the beetle-plant interface. Genome Biol. 17, 227 (2016).
Huang, Q. et al. Identification of sex chromosomes and primary sex ratio in the small hive beetle, a worldwide parasite of honey bees. Gigascience 12 (2022).
Xue, H. J. et al. The draft genome of the specialist flea beetle Altica viridicyanea (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). BMC Genomics 22, 243 (2021).
Arnqvist, G. et al. A chromosome-level assembly of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus genome with annotation of its repetitive elements. G3 (Bethesda) (2023).
Keeling, C. I. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly reveals genomic architecture of northern range expansion in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Mol Ecol Resour 22, 1149–1167 (2022).
Liu, Z. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and population genomic analyses provide insights into adaptive evolution of the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens. BMC Biol. 20, 190 (2022).
Coates, B. S. et al. A draft Diabrotica virgifera virgifera genome: insights into control and host plant adaption by a major maize pest insect. BMC Genomics 24, 19 (2023).
Lukicheva, S., Flot, J. F. & Mardulyn, P. Genome assembly of the cold-tolerant leaf beetle Gonioctena quinquepunctata, an important resource for studying its evolution and reproductive barriers between species. Genome Biol. Evol. 13 (2021).
Schoville, S. D. et al. A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Sci. Rep. 8, 1931 (2018).
Weng, Y. M., Francoeur, C. B., Currie, C. R., Kavanaugh, D. H. & Schoville, S. D. A high-quality carabid genome assembly provides insights into beetle genome evolution and cold adaptation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 2145–2165 (2021).
Fallon, T. R. et al. Firefly genomes illuminate parallel origins of bioluminescence in beetles. Elife 7 (2018).
Parisot, N. et al. The transposable element-rich genome of the cereal pest Sitophilus oryzae. BMC Biol. 19, 241 (2021).
Herndon, N. et al. Enhanced genome assembly and a new official gene set for Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genomics 21, 47 (2020).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27, 1164–1165 (2011).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Suleski, M. & Hedges, S. B. TimeTree: A resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1812–1819 (2017).
Sanderson, M. J. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301–302 (2003).
Mira, V. H., Thomas, G. W. C., Lugo-Martinez, J. & Hahn, M. W. Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1987–1997 (2013).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014182/CRR1002983 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014182/CRR1002984 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014182/CRR1002982 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003137 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003138 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003139 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003140 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003141 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003142 (2023).
NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA014193/CRR1003143 (2023).
Chen, T. et al. The Genome Sequence Archive Family: Toward Explosive Data Growth and Diverse Data Types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 578–583 (2021).
Chen, M. et al. Genome Warehouse: A Public Repository Housing Genome-scale Data. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 584–589 (2021).
Zhang, B. Monochamus alternatus isolate DY-2024, whole genome shotgun sequencing project. GenBank https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:JBBBDW000000000.1 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248702 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248701 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248703 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248694 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248695 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248696 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248697 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248698 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248699 (2024).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR28248700 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2600100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070486 and 32088102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.Z. and J.S. conceived the idea. L.X., B.L. and D.Y. analyzed the data. B.Z., L.X. and D.Y. drafted the first version of the manuscript. B.L. and J.S. revised the manuscript. X.T. prepared the materials. B.Z. and J.S. supervised the project. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, L., Liu, B., Yu, D. et al. A near-complete genome assembly of Monochamus alternatus a major vector beetle of pinewood nematode. Sci Data 11, 312 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03150-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03150-1