Abstract
Bats are considered reservoirs of many lethal zoonotic viruses and have been implicated in several outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. It is necessary to systematically derive the expression patterns of bat virus receptors and their regulatory features for future research into bat-borne viruses and the prediction and prevention of pandemics. Here, we performed single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) and single-nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (snATAC-seq) of major organ samples collected from Chinese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus affinis) and systematically checked the expression pattern of bat-related virus receptors and chromatin accessibility across organs and cell types, providing a valuable dataset for studying the nature of infection among bat-borne viruses.
Measurement(s) | RNA-seq gene expression profiling assay • ATAC-Seq |
Technology Type(s) | RNA-seq of coding RNA from single cells • Single cell ATAC-seq (cell index) |
Sample Characteristic - Organism | Rhinolophus affinis |
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
Bats are one of the most diverse mammalian groups, comprising approximately one-fifth of all known mammal species. Bats have been identified as natural reservoir hosts of several emerging viruses that can cause severe disease in humans, including Ebola virus disease and Nipah fever1,2. Accumulating evidence also suggests that other emerging viruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory coronavirus (MERS-CoV), also have bat origins3. Another emerging coronavirus, swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus, emerged from horseshoe bats and killed many pigs4. The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) further underscores the ongoing threat of bat-borne virus spillover5. The shedding of these zoonotic viruses from bat populations can vary considerably across locations and times, posing fluctuating threats of spillover to other species. Transmission is promoted by successive processes that enable an animal pathogen to establish an infection in a human. The probability of zoonotic spillover is determined by interactions among several factors, including disease dynamics in the reservoir host, pathogen exposure, and genetic factors that affect host susceptibility to infections. One of the most essential and key characteristics of zoonotic spillover is virus-receptor interaction6. As viruses only replicate inside living cells, these pathogens have to cope with a series of positive and negative factors in the target cells to survive. In the absence of an appropriate receptor on the cells, they cannot achieve infection and therefore cannot replicate. Moreover, the presence or absence of specific cell surface receptors can influence the host range and tissue tropism of viruses7. Understanding virus receptor patterns in vivo would be an important first step for preventing and responding to future outbreaks.
Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) is now widely used in different species, such as humans8,9 and mice10, to deconstruct the composition of organs and detect cell-type subgroups in tissues. snRNA-seq can also be used to profile gene expression patterns across tissues, organs, and even the whole body11. Thus, it is feasible to characterize the in vivo expression pattern of bat-related virus receptors using snRNA-seq. Single-nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (snATAC-seq) has recently been developed to study cell-type-specific chromatin accessibility in tissue or organ samples containing a heterogeneous cellular population12, and such data can be used to explore gene regulatory networks13. Here, we performed snATAC-seq to study the chromatin accessibility and regulatory features of bat virus receptors.
In this study, we performed snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq in the intermediate horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus affinis), a species of the Rhinolophidae family that is widely used in bat virus research3,14,15. We performed snRNA-seq of seven organs, including the brain, heart, kidney, lung, spleen, liver, and stomach, in a total of 85,832 nuclei. We also performed snATAC-seq of two organs, the kidney and lung, in a total of 12,678 nuclei. We profiled the expression pattern of bat-related virus receptors across these seven organs based on DBatVir, a database of bat-associated viruses that lists over 4,100 bat-associated animal viruses from 23 virus families16, showing that many of these receptors present organ- and cell-type-specific expression. Meanwhile, we checked the chromatin accessibility of virus receptors in the kidney and lung and found that their expression patterns were different among organs and tissues.
Methods
Sample collection
Rhinolophus affinis was obtained from a cave in Guangdong Province during April 2020. The bats were treated with pentobarbital sodium (75 mg/kg). The brain, heart, lung, kidney, stomach, liver, and spleen tissues were then isolated. To avoid RNA degradation in the wild situation as much as possible and harvest high-quality nuclei for downstream library construction, all the tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen within 15 minutes. After analysis with a nucleic acid detection kit for coronavirus, the samples that were negative for coronaviruses were transferred to BGI-Shenzhen for subsequent experiments. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of BGI.
Single-nucleus suspension preparation
The nuclei were extracted from each snap-frozen tissue following the protocol described previously17 with minor modifications. In brief, frozen tissues were thawed in a 30 mm culture dish and cut to a size of 1–3 mm3 with tweezers and scissors. The cut tissues were then transferred into a douncer (Kimble Chase, #885301–0002) with 2 mL chilled homogenization buffer consisting of 10 mM Trizma Hydrochloride Solution, pH 8.0, (Sigma-Aldrich, #T2694), 250 mM sucrose (Sangon Biotech, #A610498-0500), 25 mM KCl (Sigma-Aldrich, #60142-100ML-F), 5 mM MgCl2 (Ambion, #AM9530G), 0.1 mM DTT (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #18064014), 1X cOmplete™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, #04693116001), 0.4 U/μL RNase inhibitor (New England Biolabs, #M0314L), 0.1% Nonidet P40 Substitute (Roche, #11332473001) and 1% BSA (Sangon Biotech, #A600332-0005). The tissues were homogenized with 10 strokes of the loose pestle. After straining through a 70 μm cell strainer (Falcon, #352350), the homogenate was transferred to another douncer. Five strokes were applied with a loose pestle to completely release the nuclei. The homogenate was filtered through a 30 μm cell strainer (Sysmex, #04-004-2326). The nuclei were centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 minutes at 4 °C and then washed with 1X PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.2 U/μL RNase inhibitor. Finally, the nuclei were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in cell resuspension buffer. The nuclei from each tissue were stained with DAPI (Beyotime, #C1006) and counted under a fluorescence microscope.
snRNA-seq library construction
snRNA-seq libraries were constructed according to instructions of the DNBelab C4 scRNA Preparation Kit as previously described17. In short, the nuclei were diluted to a concentration of 1,000 nuclei/μL and loaded into the cell reservoir of a microfluidics chip. Barcoded beads and droplet generation oil were successively added to the beads and oil reservoirs. Encapsulated droplets were generated and collected in the DNBelab C4 system. The beads capturing mRNA were recovered for reverse transcription. After amplification by polymerase chain reaction, the cDNA was purified and quantified utilizing a QubitTM dsDNA kit (Invitrogen, #Q32854). Libraries of 3-end transcripts were subsequently constructed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, including cDNA fragmentation, size selection, end repair and A-tailing, adapter ligation, PCR for indexing libraries, and cyclization of the sequencing libraries. The sequencing libraries were purified and quantified with a QubitTM ssDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #Q10212).
snATAC-seq library construction
snATAC-seq libraries were prepared with the DNBelab C4 scATAC Library Preparation Kit as previously described18. In brief, the extracted nuclei were treated with a Tn5 transposase coupling adapter. The transposed nuclei and barcoded beads were encompassed in droplets by the DNBelab C4 system. Preamplification, the collection of beads capturing ATAC fragments, and secondary amplification were then successively carried out for the indexed sequencing libraries according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sequencing libraries were quantified with a Qubit ssDNA Assay Kit.
Sequencing
Both the snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq libraries were sequenced on the BGI DNBSEQTM technology platform. DNA nanoballs (DNBs) were generated from the libraries and loaded into patterned nanoarrays. The libraries were then sequenced on a sequencer according to the paired-end strategy. The read length of snRNA-seq libraries was 30 bp for read 1 and 100 bp for read 2. The snATAC-seq libraries contained 50 bp paired-end reads, and the barcode reads were 20 bp.
snRNA-seq data processing
Raw reads were aligned to the genome of Rhinolophus sinicus19, and unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) count matrix was generated by using Cell Ranger (version 6.1.2). Reads were aligned to reference genome by Cell Ranger build-in STAR alignment pipeline, and all parameters are default values. We applied DoubletFinder20 to remove doublets for approximately 5% of the estimated total nuclei. Table 1 summarizes sequencing parameters for the snRNA-seq dataset. Consistent with the previous study21, the libraries from the same tissue were then analyzed using reciprocal PCA (RPCA) of Seurat (version 4.0.5) (https://satijalab.org/seurat/articles/integration_rpca.html) and Harmony (version 1.0) (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/harmony/) with default parameters to remove potential batch effects. The datasets of this study originate from the same platform better suitable for RPCA-based integrative analysis. Also, the marker genes identified by RPCA were slightly more specific than Harmony (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). Ultimately we chose the batch-correction result of the RPCA method for downstream analysis. Batch effect removal is essential in data integration analysis. Therefore, we recommend selecting a suitable method for data generating from different platforms after systematically evaluating different batch-correction methods.
Cell clustering and identification of cell types
Clustering analysis of the seven Rhinolophus affinis tissue datasets was performed using Seurat (version 4.0.5)22 in the R environment. The parameters of each function were manually curated to portray the optimal clustering of cells. In preprocessing, cells were filtered based on the distribution of genes and UMIs for each tissue. The criteria were as follows: (i) for the brain, heart, kidney, lung, liver, and spleen, a cell expressing a minimum of 200 genes and a gene that was expressed in a minimum of 3 nuclei; (ii) for the stomach, a cell expressing a minimum of 100 genes and a gene that was expressed in a minimum of 3 nuclei; (iii) for all tissues, a cell expressing a maximum of 2,500 genes. The filtered data were normalized and scaled according to Seurat NormalizeData and ScaleData with the default parameters. A total of 2,000 highly variable genes were selected for subsequent analysis. Dimension reduction starts with principal component analysis (PCA), and the number of principal components used for Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) depends on the importance of the embeddings. The chosen resolution of the Louvain method was 0.4 for each tissue and 1.2 for all tissue together according to subgroup rationality. The results of the Louvain method distinguishing differential genes among clusters were ranked (Benjamini-Hochberg, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Finally, we annotated each cell type according to extensive literature review and searching for specific gene expression patterns9,10,23.
Expression analysis of virus receptor genes
45 bat virus receptor genes were collected from the public database. The results of the expression analysis of virus receptor genes were visualized by using Seurat and R.
snATAC-seq data processing
Raw reads were split into insertions and barcodes and filtered by PISA (version 1.1) (https://github.com/PolyTTT/PISA/)24 with a minimum sequencing quality of 20. Table 2 summarized the sequencing parameters of the snATAC-seq datasets. Filtered reads were aligned to the Rhinolophus sinicus genome by BWA (version 0.7.17-r1188)25. BAM files were processed with bap2 (version 0.6.2)26, which can find barcodes from the same cell.
snATAC-seq data analysis
Files of accessible read fragments were generated by using bap2 software. Downstream ATAC-seq data analysis was performed with ArchR27. The offset of the positive chain Tn5 insertion was +4, while that of the negative chain was −5. The promoter region was 2,000 bp upstream and 100 bp downstream of the transcription start sites (TSSs). We used the following selection criteria to filter out low-quality cells: (i) We filtered out all single nuclei that had fewer than 3,004 and 4,471 unique fragments in the kidney and lung, respectively; (ii) Single nuclei less than 5.149 and 6.409 TSS enrichment scores were filtered out in the kidney and lung, respectively; (iii) Potential diploids were further removed based on the ArchR method (filterRatio = 2.5). The batch effect of libraries originating from same tissue was corrected by using Harmony28. Dimensionality reduction was performed using iterative latent semantic indexing (LSI) in ArchR, and clustering was performed using the Leiden algorithm based on Seurat (resolution = 0.5). snATAC-seq cell-type labels were identified according to classical markers. We used the addGeneIntegrationMatrix function to integrate snATAC-seq dataset with snRNA-seq dataset with unconstrained methods in ArchR. After labeling the cell types in each dataset, the peaks of each cell type were generated using addGroupCoverages function and addReproduciblePeakSet function. We identified differentially accessible peaks (DAPs) in an unsupervised fashion in ArchR using the addMarkerFeatures function. DAPs were selected with the filter string “FDR ≤ 0.1 & Log2FC ≥ 0.5”.
Data Records
All raw data have been submitted to the CNGB Nucleotide Sequence Archive (https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0001406/)29. Raw data have also been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive, and the BioProject accession identifier is PRJNA69336430. The cell-gene matrix, cell-peak matrix and all cell cluster files were submitted to the CNGB Nucleotide Sequence Archive (https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0001406/)29.
Technical Validation
snRNA-seq
Nuclei were extracted from the organ specimens isolated from bats, and single-nucleus suspensions were then prepared for snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq (see methods) (Fig. 1a). The data were processed via a standard pipeline (Fig. 1b). Samples from seven major organs were prepared for snRNA-seq, including the brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, spleen and stomach. After quality control (see methods), we obtained a total of 85,832 nuclei; the mean UMIs for each nucleus was 901 (Fig. 2a), and the mean gene number for each nucleus was 488 (Fig. 2a). The stomach exhibited far fewer UMIs and genes than other organs, but considering that the stomach tissue data showed significantly related markers, we decided to retain the data (Supplementary Fig. 2). UMAP showed that the cells from different organs were clearly separated, although a small number of mixed cells were observed (Fig. 2b). Using the unsupervised cluster algorithm Louvain (see methods), we obtained 19 clusters (Fig. 2c), and each cluster included significant specific gene sets (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Table 1). We annotated each cluster to corresponding cell types according to its specific markers (Fig. 2e). The results for each organ could be further clustered into several specific subgroups (Supplementary Fig. 2) with significant distinct markers (Supplementary Fig. 3).
snATAC-seq
SARS-CoV-2 is mainly detected in the lung and kidney31,32, so we sought to explore the chromatin accessibility of related virus receptors in these two organs. Hence, we performed snATAC-seq of the kidney and lung and obtained two libraries for each organ. After quality control, we obtained 7,049 nuclei from the kidney and 5,629 nuclei from the lung. In the kidney dataset, the two libraries showed similar quality features, the TSS enrichment scores were mostly distributed between 8–25, and the numbers of unique nuclear fragments were mainly distributed from 6,000–60,000 (Fig. 3a,b). The TSS enrichment profile showed a clear peak at the TSS and a smaller peak caused by a well-positioned + 1 nucleosome to the right of the center (Fig. 3c). The results showed that the two libraries presented similar performance. Then, nuclei were clustered and annotated by using ArchR (see methods), which covered 9 kidney cell types (Fig. 3d). Using these clusters, we called peaks to create a union set of 266,110 reproducible peaks based on pseudobulk chromatin accessibility. Peaks of specific expression were identified in all clusters (Fig. 3e,f). We performed the same analysis on the lung dataset, and we obtained 5,629 nuclei, which were clustered and annotated to six lung cell types, a total of 267,879 peaks were called (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Consistency of snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq results
Next, we integrated the snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq data. To visualize the correspondence between peaks and genes, we generated a peak-to-gene heatmap containing two side-by-side heatmaps, one of which represented the snATAC-seq data, while the other represented the snRNA-seq data. We identified 52,970 and 84,651 peak-to-gene links in the kidney and lung, respectively, in which the results showed strong consistency between the peaks and genes (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 5a).
BAT-related virus receptor features
We checked the relationship between the expression profile and chromatin accessibility of representative virus receptor genes. We found that CD55 was mostly expressed in the lung and was not expressed in the kidney (Supplementary Fig. 5b), and CD55 showed specific peaks near the TSS in the lung (Supplementary Fig. 5c). We systematically checked the expression patterns of bat virus receptors in our data. First, we collected data on 102 bat virus receptors using the DBatVir database16 and public datasets, among 25 receptors were expressed in organ-specific patterns (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Table 2). Furthermore, most of these 25 receptors were expressed only in specific cell types in the corresponding organs (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Bats have been identified as natural reservoir hosts for several emerging viruses that can cause severe disease in humans, including Ebola, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, etc. Therefore, we checked the expression pattern of 8 bat receptors of zoonotic viruses23, including ACE2, TMPRSS2 (related to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2)33,34, DPP4 (related to MERS-CoV)35, ANPEP (related to HCoV-229E)36, EFNB2 (related to Hendra virus and Nipah virus)37, NPC1 (related to Ebola virus and Marburg virus)38, CXADR (related to adenovirus)39, and NCAM1 (related to rabies virus)40. The results showed that ACE2 was weakly expressed in the kidney and spleen, whereas other receptors were expressed in an organ- and cell-type-specific manner (Fig. 4c). Then, we checked the chromatin accessibility of several representative receptors and found that ANPEP and NPC1 were selectively expressed in several cell types in the kidney (Supplementary Fig. 6) and that the peaks located near their TSSs also showed a cell type-specific pattern (Fig. 4d).
We provided high-quality snRNA-seq data and snATAC-seq data from several major organs of Rhinolophus affinis. We systematically screened the expression pattern and accessibility features of bat virus receptors, which will provide a valuable resource for further research on the pathogenesis and zoonotic transmission of bat-borne viruses.
Usage Notes
The snRNA-seq data analyses, including the processing pipeline, read mapping, gene calling, and the snATAC-seq data processing pipeline, including read mapping and peak calling, were run on the Linux operating system. All R source codes with the optimized parameters used for the downstream data analyses and visualization are provided online (https://figshare.com/s/132dd4a1d364e459bac8)41.
Code availability
The R code used to identify cell subclusters and profile tissue-specific virus receptor expression and tissue-specific chromatin accessible regions are available online (https://figshare.com/s/132dd4a1d364e459bac8)41.
References
Leroy, E. M. et al. Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature 438, 575–576 (2005).
Kessler, M. K. et al. Changing resource landscapes and spillover of henipaviruses. Ann Ny Acad Sci 1429, 78–99 (2018).
Fan, Y., Zhao, K., Shi, Z.-L. & Zhou, P. Bat Coronaviruses in China. Viruses 11, 210 (2019).
Zhou, P. et al. Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin. Nature 556, 255–258 (2018).
Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).
Plowright, R. K. et al. Pathways to zoonotic spillover. Nat Rev Microbiol 15, 502–510 (2017).
Maginnis, M. S. Virus-Receptor Interactions: The Key to Cellular Invasion. J Mol Biol 430, 2590–2611 (2018).
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Stubbington, M. J. T., Regev, A. & Teichmann, S. A. The Human Cell Atlas: from vision to reality. Nature 550, 451–453 (2017).
Han, X. et al. Construction of a human cell landscape at single-cell level. Nature 581, 303–309 (2020).
Han, X. et al. Mapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e17 (2018).
Ziegler, C. G. K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is an interferon-stimulated gene in human airway epithelial cells and is detected in specific cell subsets across tissues. Cell 181, 1016–1035.e19 (2020).
Cusanovich, D. A. et al. A Single-Cell Atlas of In Vivo Mammalian Chromatin Accessibility. Cell 174, 1309–1324.e18 (2018).
Ma, S. et al. Chromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single-Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin. Cell, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.056 (2020).
Ge, X.-Y. et al. Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft. Virol Sin 31, 31–40 (2016).
Wu, Z. et al. Deciphering the bat virome catalog to better understand the ecological diversity of bat viruses and the bat origin of emerging infectious diseases. Isme J 10, 609–620 (2016).
Chen, L., Liu, B., Yang, J. & Jin, Q. DBatVir: the database of bat-associated viruses. Database 2014, bau021 (2014).
Bakken, T. E. et al. Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types. Plos One 13, e0209648 (2018).
Yu, Y. et al. Single-Nucleus Chromatin Accessibility Landscape Reveals Diversity in Regulatory Regions Across Distinct Adult Rat Cortex. Front Mol Neurosci 14, 651355 (2021).
Dong, D. et al. The Genomes of Two Bat Species with Long Constant Frequency Echolocation Calls. Mol Biol Evol 34, 20–34 (2016).
McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: Doublet Detection in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Using Artificial Nearest Neighbors. Cell Syst 8, 329–337.e4 (2019).
Chen, W. et al. A multicenter study benchmarking single-cell RNA sequencing technologies using reference samples. Nat Biotechnol 39, 1103–1114 (2021).
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021).
Ren, L. et al. Single-cell transcriptional atlas of the Chinese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus sinicus) provides insight into the cellular mechanisms which enable bats to be viral reservoirs. Biorxiv 2020.06.30.175778, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.30.175778 (2020).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive scale single-cell epigenomics. Biorxiv 612713, https://doi.org/10.1101/612713 (2019).
Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nat Genet 53, 403–411 (2021).
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
CNGB Nucleotide Sequence Archive, https://doi.org/10.26036/CNP0001406(2021).
NCBI Sequence Read Archive, https://identifiers.org/ncbi/bioproject:PRJNA693364(2021).
Wu, C., Zheng, S., Chen, Y. & Zheng, M. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCoV, in the nasal tissue. Medrxiv 2020.02.11.20022228, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.20022228 (2020).
Diao, B. et al. Human kidney is a target for novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Nat Commun 12, 2506 (2021).
Li, W. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426, 450–454 (2003).
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e8 (2020).
Raj, V. S. et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495, 251–254 (2013).
Yeager, C. L. et al. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature 357, 420–422 (1992).
Bonaparte, M. I. et al. Ephrin-B2 ligand is a functional receptor for Hendra virus and Nipah virus. P Natl Acad Sci Usa 102, 10652–10657 (2005).
Carette, J. E. et al. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann–Pick C1. Nature 477, 340–343 (2011).
Kobayashi, T. et al. Characterization of a novel species of adenovirus from Japanese microbat and role of CXADR as its entry factor. Sci Rep-uk 9, 573 (2019).
Thoulouze, M.-I. et al. The Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Is a Receptor for Rabies Virus. J Virol 72, 7181–7190 (1998).
Lv, T.-H. et al. A map of bat virus receptors derived from single-cell multiomics. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5884433.v1 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank the China National GeneBank for providing sequencing services for this project. This work was supported by Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Single-Cell Omics (ZDSYS20190902093613831). Gary Wong is funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFC0863400), the Alliance of International Scientific Organizations (Grant No. AN-SO-CR-SP-2020-02), G4 funding from Institut Pasteur, Fondation Merieux and Chinese Academy of Sciences. Longqi Liu is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31900466). Chuanyu Liu is funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020T130080ZX). Xiaoshan Wang is funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702280).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.L., G.W., C.Y., C.L. and Z.W. conceived the idea for the study. L. Li, X.H. and L.Z. collected samples. Z.W., Y.Yuan, Y.Yu, Q.D. and P.W. generated the data. T.L., X. Wang and R.X. analyzed the data with the assistance of Y.W. and X. Wei. X. Wang wrote the manuscript with the input of T.L., R.X., and Y.W.. C.L., L.L., J.C., G.W., C.Y. and Y.H. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Employees of BGI have stock holdings in BGI.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lv, T., Wang, X., Yu, C. et al. A map of bat virus receptors derived from single-cell multiomics. Sci Data 9, 336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01447-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01447-7
This article is cited by
-
Integrative single-cell characterization of a frugivorous and an insectivorous bat kidney and pancreas
Nature Communications (2024)