Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Generating human blastoids modeling blastocyst-stage embryos and implantation

Nature Protocols (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Human early development sets the stage for embryonic and adult life but remains difficult to investigate. A solution came from the ability of stem cells to organize into structures resembling preimplantation embryos—blastocysts—that we termed blastoids. This embryo model is available in unlimited numbers and could thus support scientific and medical advances. However, its predictive power depends on how faithfully it recapitulates the blastocyst. Here, we describe how we formed human blastoids that (1) efficiently achieve the morphology of the blastocyst and (2) form lineages according to the pace and sequence of blastocyst development, (3) ultimately forming cells that transcriptionally reflect the blastocyst (preimplantation stage). We employ three different commercially available 96- and 24-well microwell plates with results similar to our custom-made ones, and show that blastoids form in clinical in vitro fertilization medium and can be cryopreserved for shipping. Finally, we explain how blastoids replicate the directional process of implantation into endometrial organoids, specifically when these are hormonally stimulated. It takes 4 d for human blastoids to form and 10 d to prepare the endometrial implantation assay, and we have cultured blastoids up to 6 d (time-equivalent of day 13). On the basis of our experience, we anticipate that a person with ~1 year of human pluripotent stem cell culture experience and of organoid culture should be able to perform the protocol. Altogether, blastoids offer an opportunity to establish scientific and biomedical discovery programs for early pregnancy, and an ethical alternative to the use of embryos.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A schematic of the time window of human peri-implantation development modeled by blastoids.
Fig. 2: Schematic overview of the protocol.
Fig. 3: Four basic criteria to validate the formation of blastoids.
Fig. 4: Morphological characterization of PXGL hPSCs.
Fig. 5: Triple inhibition of Hippo, ERK and TGFβ pathways leads to efficient and robust formation of human blastoids composed of blastocyst-like cells.
Fig. 6: Human blastoids resemble the morphology of the blastocyst, comprise analogs of the three founding lineages and form an axis.
Fig. 7: Representative images of endometrial organoids and monolayers.
Fig. 8: Human blastoids recapitulate aspects of implantation.

Data availability

The main data discussed in this protocol were generated as part of the study published in the supporting primary research paper by Kagawa et al.26. Representative results obtained using this protocol are available within the article, with additional examples available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Stamatiadis, P. et al. TEAD4 regulates trophectoderm differentiation upstream of CDX2 in a GATA3-independent manner in the human preimplantation embryo. Hum. Reprod. 37, 1760–1773 (2022).

  2. Gerri, C. et al. Initiation of a conserved trophectoderm program in human, cow and mouse embryos. Nature 587, 443–447 (2020).

  3. Ma, H. et al. In vitro culture of cynomolgus monkey embryos beyond early gastrulation. Science 366, eaax7890 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Leary, T. et al. Tracking the progression of the human inner cell mass during embryonic stem cell derivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 278–282 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sunde, A. et al. Time to take human embryo culture seriously. Hum. Reprod. 31, 2174–2182 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zinaman, M. J., Clegg, E. D., Brown, C. C., O’Connor, J. & Selevan, S. G. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil. Steril. 65, 503–509 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarvis, G. E. Early embryo mortality in natural human reproduction: what the data say. F1000Res. 5, 2765 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Norwitz, E. R., Schust, D. J. & Fisher, S. J. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1400–1408 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D. & Weinberg, C. R. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 1796–1799 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Cooper, C. & Thornburg, K. L. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 61–73 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barker, D. J. et al. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 341, 938–941 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cha, J., Sun, X. & Dey, S. K. Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 18, 1754–1767 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Siriwardena, D. & Boroviak, T. E. Evolutionary divergence of embryo implantation in primates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 377, 20210256 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu, J., Warmflash, A. & Lutolf, M. P. Stem-cell-based embryo models for fundamental research and translation. Nat. Mater. 20, 132–144 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivron, N. C. et al. Blastocyst-like structures generated solely from stem cells. Nature 557, 106–111 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amita, M. et al. Complete and unidirectional conversion of human embryonic stem cells to trophoblast by BMP4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1212–E1221 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cinkornpumin, J. K. et al. Naive human embryonic stem cells can give rise to cells with a trophoblast-like transcriptome and methylome. Stem Cell Rep. 15, 198–213 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Castel, G. et al. Induction of human trophoblast stem cells from somatic cells and pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 33, 108419 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Io, S. et al. Capturing human trophoblast development with naive pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1023–1039.e13 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo, G. et al. Human naive epiblast cells possess unrestricted lineage potential. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1040–1056.e6 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yanagida, A. et al. Naive stem cell blastocyst model captures human embryo lineage segregation. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1016–1022.e4 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Okae, H. et al. Derivation of human trophoblast stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 22, 50–63.e6 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meistermann, D. et al. Integrated pseudotime analysis of human pre-implantation embryo single-cell transcriptomes reveals the dynamics of lineage specification. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1625–1640.e6 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Radley, A., Corujo-Simon, E., Nichols, J., Smith, A. & Dunn, S.-J. Entropy sorting of single-cell RNA sequencing data reveals the inner cell mass in the human pre-implantation embryo. Stem Cell Rep. 18, 47–63 (2022).

  25. Seong, J. et al. Epiblast inducers capture mouse trophectoderm stem cells in vitro and pattern blastoids for implantation in utero. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1102–1118.e8 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kagawa, H. et al. Human blastoids model blastocyst development and implantation. Nature 610, 600–605 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, R., Zhong, C. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. Time matters: human blastoids resemble the sequence of blastocyst development. Cell 185, 581–584 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nichols, J. & Smith, A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487–492 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taubenschmid-Stowers, J. et al. 8C-like cells capture the human zygotic genome activation program in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 29, 449–459.e6 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mazid, M. A. et al. Rolling back human pluripotent stem cells to an eight-cell embryo-like stage. Nature 605, 315–324 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Posfai, E. et al. Evaluating totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 49–60 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo, G. et al. Epigenetic resetting of human pluripotency. Development 144, 2748–2763 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Takashima, Y. et al. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human. Cell 158, 1254–1269 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Stirparo, G. G. et al. Integrated analysis of single-cell embryo data yields a unified transcriptome signature for the human pre-implantation epiblast. Development 145, dev158501 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Theunissen, T. W. et al. Molecular criteria for defining the naive human pluripotent state. Cell Stem Cell 19, 502–515 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bayerl, J. et al. Principles of signaling pathway modulation for enhancing human naive pluripotency induction. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1549–1565.e12 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Paepe, C. D. et al. Human trophectoderm cells are not yet committed. Hum. Reprod. 28, 740–749 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Slack, J. M. W. & Slack. From Egg to Embryo: Regional Specification in Early Development. (Cambridge University Press, 1991).

  39. Zijlmans, D. W. et al. Integrated multi-omics reveal polycomb repressive complex 2 restricts human trophoblast induction. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 858–871 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar, B. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 shields naïve human pluripotent cells from trophectoderm differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 845–857 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, Y. et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell 169, 243–257.e25 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakamura, T. et al. A developmental coordinate of pluripotency among mice, monkeys and humans. Nature 537, 57–62 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bredenkamp, N. et al. Wnt inhibition facilitates RNA-mediated reprogramming of human somatic cells to naive pluripotency. Stem Cell Rep. 13, 1083–1098 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo, G. et al. Naive pluripotent stem cells derived directly from isolated cells of the human inner cell mass. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 437–446 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Khan, S. A. et al. Probing the signaling requirements for naive human pluripotency by high-throughput chemical screening. Cell Rep. 35, 109233 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kagawa, H. et al. Protocol for human blastoids modeling blastocyst development and implantation. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/63388 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stephenson, R. O., Rossant, J. & Tam, P. P. L. Intercellular interactions, position, and polarity in establishing blastocyst cell lineages and embryonic axes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008235 (2012).

  48. Korotkevich, E. et al. The apical domain is required and sufficient for the first lineage segregation in the mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 40, 235–247.e7 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim, E. J. Y., Korotkevich, E. & Hiiragi, T. Coordination of cell polarity, mechanics and fate in tissue self-organization. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 541–550 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hirate, Y. et al. Polarity-dependent distribution of angiomotin localizes Hippo signaling in preimplantation embryos. Curr. Biol. 23, 1181–1194 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cockburn, K., Biechele, S., Garner, J. & Rossant, J. The Hippo pathway member Nf2 is required for inner cell mass specification. Curr. Biol. 23, 1195–1201 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nishioka, N. et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev. Cell 16, 398–410 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, F.-X. et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Cell 150, 780–791 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Rivron, N. C. et al. Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6886–6891 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Vrij, E. et al. Directed assembly and development of material-free tissues with complex architectures. Adv. Mater. 28, 4032–4039 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Frias-Aldeguer, J. et al. Embryonic signals perpetuate polar-like trophoblast stem cells and pattern the blastocyst axis. Preprintat at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/510362 (2020).

  57. Rostovskaya, M., Andrews, S., Reik, W. & Rugg-Gunn, P. J. Amniogenesis occurs in two independent waves in primates. Cell Stem Cell 29, 744–759.e6 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ohgushi, M. & Sasai, Y. Lonely death dance of human pluripotent stem cells: ROCKing between metastable cell states. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 274–282 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pham, T. X. A. et al. Modeling human extraembryonic mesoderm cells using naive pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1346–1365.e10 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao, C. et al. Reprogrammed iBlastoids contain amnion-like cells but not trophectoderm. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.07.442980 (2021).

  61. Clark, A. T. et al. Human embryo research, stem cell-derived embryo models and in vitro gametogenesis: Considerations leading to the revised ISSCR guidelines. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 1416–1424 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lovell-Badge, R. et al. ISSCR guidelines for stem cell research and clinical translation: the 2021 update. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 1398–1408 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Singh, H., Nardo, L., Kimber, S. J. & Aplin, J. D. Early stages of implantation as revealed by an in vitro model. Reproduction 139, 905–914 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Heng, S. et al. Podocalyxin inhibits human embryo implantation in vitro and luminal podocalyxin in putative receptive endometrium is associated with implantation failure in fertility treatment. Fertil. Steril. 116, 1391–1401 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hannan, N. J., Paiva, P., Dimitriadis, E. & Salamonsen, L. A. Models for study of human embryo implantation: choice of cell lines? Biol. Reprod. 82, 235–245 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang, D. et al. A new model for embryo implantation: coculture of blastocysts and Ishikawa cells. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 28, 288–292 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ruane, P. T. et al. The effects of hyaluronate-containing medium on human embryo attachment to endometrial epithelial cells. Hum. Reprod. Open 2020, hoz033 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Turco, M. Y. et al. Long-term, hormone-responsive organoid cultures of human endometrium in a chemically defined medium. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 568–577 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Boretto, M. et al. Development of organoids from mouse and human endometrium showing endometrial epithelium physiology and long-term expandability. Development 144, 1775–1786 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yu, S.-L. et al. Transcriptomic analysis and competing endogenous RNA network in the human endometrium between proliferative and mid-secretory phases. Exp. Ther. Med. 21, 660 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang, W. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Nat. Med. 26, 1644–1653 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tulac, S. et al. Dickkopf-1, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling, is regulated by progesterone in human endometrial stromal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91, 1453–1461 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Garcia-Alonso, L. et al. Mapping the temporal and spatial dynamics of the human endometrium in vivo and in vitro. Nat. Genet. 53, 1698–1711 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Vollset, S. E. et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 396, 1285–1306 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Marx, V. Modeling the early embryo. Nat. Methods 19, 644–648 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Dumortier, J. G. et al. Hydraulic fracturing and active coarsening position the lumen of the mouse blastocyst. Science 365, 465–468 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Salmen, F. et al. High-throughput total RNA sequencing in single cells using VASA-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01361-8 (2022).

  78. Clark, S. J. et al. scNMT-seq enables joint profiling of chromatin accessibility DNA methylation and transcription in single cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 781 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Fan, Y. et al. Generation of human blastocyst-like structures from pluripotent stem cells. Cell Discov. 7, 81 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu, X. et al. Modelling human blastocysts by reprogramming fibroblasts into iBlastoids. Nature 591, 627–632 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sozen, B. et al. Reconstructing aspects of human embryogenesis with pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 12, 5550 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Yu, L. et al. Blastocyst-like structures generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 591, 620–626 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Chen, Y., Siriwardena, D., Penfold, C., Pavlinek, A. & Boroviak, T. E. An integrated atlas of human placental development delineates essential regulators of trophoblast stem cells. Development 149, dev200171 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Shapiro, B. S., Daneshmand, S. T., Garner, F. C., Aguirre, M. & Thomas, S. Large blastocyst diameter, early blastulation, and low preovulatory serum progesterone are dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles. Fertil. Steril. 90, 302–309 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Baumann, K. A role model of human blastocysts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 91 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Posfai, E., Lanner, F., Mulas, C. & Leitch, H. G. All models are wrong, but some are useful: establishing standards for stem cell-based embryo models. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 1117–1141 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Hyun, I., Munsie, M., Pera, M. F., Rivron, N. C. & Rossant, J. Toward guidelines for research on human embryo models formed from stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 14, 169–174 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Collier, A. J. et al. Comprehensive cell surface protein profiling identifies specific markers of human naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 20, 874–890.e7 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bredenkamp, N., Stirparo, G. G., Nichols, J., Smith, A. & Guo, G. The cell-surface marker sushi containing domain 2 facilitates establishment of human naive pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 1212–1222 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Baker, D. & Barbaric, I. Characterizing the genetic stability of human naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2416, 267–284 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Boretto, M. et al. Patient-derived organoids from endometrial disease capture clinical heterogeneity and are amenable to drug screening. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1041–1051 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Fujii, M., Matano, M., Nanki, K. & Sato, T. Efficient genetic engineering of human intestinal organoids using electroporation. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1474–1485 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Shin, W. & Kim, H. J. 3D in vitro morphogenesis of human intestinal epithelium in a gut-on-a-chip or a hybrid chip with a cell culture insert. Nat. Protoc. 17, 910–939 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Heijmans, J. et al. ER stress causes rapid loss of intestinal epithelial stemness through activation of the unfolded protein response. Cell Rep. 3, 1128–1139 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Rugg-Gunn, P. J. Induction of human naïve pluripotency using chemical resetting. Methods Mol. Biol. 2416, 29–37 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Behringer, R., Gertsenstein, M., Nagy, K. V. & Nagy, A. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2013).

  97. Jeschke, U. et al. The human endometrium expresses the glycoprotein mucin-1 and shows positive correlation for Thomsen-Friedenreich epitope expression and galectin-1 binding. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 57, 871–881 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ERC-Co grant agreement no. 101002317 ‘BLASTOID: a discovery platform for early human embryogenesis’). This project has received funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), Lise Meitner Programme M3131-B, H.H.K. is supported by FWF. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014–2020) under the Marie Skłodowska-Curi grant agreement no. 101026451. H.K. is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Research Fellowships. G.S. is supported by the HFSP number RGY0081/2019. We thank Y. Takashima for sharing the H9 and H9-GFP cell lines; A. Smith, P. Andrews and G. Guo for sharing the HNES1, Shef6, niPSC 16.2b and cR-NCRM2 cell lines; H. Baharvand for sharing the endometrial organoids; S. Srinivas for sharing the scRNA-seq data of peri-gastrulation embryo; A. Bykov and L. Cochella for technical assistance for SMARTSeq2 library preparation; and the NGS, Biooptic and Stem Cell facility at IMBA for critical assistance.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Heidar Heidari Khoei, Alok Javali, Harunobu Kagawa.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria

    Heidar Heidari Khoei, Alok Javali, Harunobu Kagawa, Theresa Maria Sommer, Giovanni Sestini, Maria Novatchkova, Yvonne Scholte op Reimer & Nicolas Rivron

  2. Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Inserm, CR2TI, UMR 1064, Nantes, France

    Laurent David

  3. Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Inserm, CNRS, BioCore, Nantes, France

    Laurent David

  4. Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), IMBA Stem Cell Core Facility (ISCCF), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria

    Jana Slovakova

  5. Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria

    Maria Novatchkova

Authors
  1. Heidar Heidari Khoei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alok Javali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harunobu Kagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Theresa Maria Sommer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giovanni Sestini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Laurent David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jana Slovakova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maria Novatchkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yvonne Scholte op Reimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nicolas Rivron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H.K., A.J., H.K. and N.R. conceived the study; N.R. supervised the project; H.K., A.J., H.H.K., T.M.S. and N.R. designed the blastoid experiments; H.K., A.J., H.H.K., T.M.S., J.S. and Y.S.o.R. performed blastoid experiments; G.S., L.D. and M.N. performed the bioinformatic analysis of scRNA-seq datasets; H.K., A.J., H.H.K., T.M.S., Y.S.o.R. and N.R. analyzed data; N.R. wrote the manuscript with help from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Rivron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, Austrian Academy of Sciences has filed patent application EP21151455.9 describing the protocols for human blastoid formation and for the blastoid–endometrium interaction assay. H.K., A.J., H.H.K. and N.R. are the inventors on this patent. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Susana Chuva de Sousa Lopes, Kiichiro Tomoda and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key paper using this protocol

Kagawa, H. et al. Nature 601, 600–605 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04267-8

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Triple inhibition of Hippo, ERK and TGFβ pathways leads to efficient and robust formation of human blastoids.

Time course bright-field images of PXGL hPSCs aggregates and blastoid formation within AggreWell (top) and microwell arrays (bottom) in PALLY medium. Scale bars, 400 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Human blastoids formation in IVF medium and vitrification.

a, Bright-field image of human blastoids formed after 48 h stimulation with PALLY medium followed by the use of IVF medium (G2, Vitrolife) for the last 2 d. Scale bars, 400 µm. b, Bright-field image of control (top) and vitrified-thawed human blastoid (bottom) and after 2 d extended culture on Matrigel-coated plate. Scale bars, 100 µm. c, Confocal immunofluorescence image of OCT4 (yellow) and aPKC (gray) in control (top) and vitrified-thawed human blastoid (bottom) cultured on Matrigel-coated plate for 2 d, counterstained with phalloidin marking F-actin (cyan). Arrows point to the pro-amniotic-like cavity. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1and 2.

Supplementary Video 1

Human blastoids attach via the polar trophectoderm. Live imaging of human blastoids attached via the polar region to hormonally stimulated layers of endometrial epithelial cells and challenged by pipetting liquid in their vicinity.

Supplementary Video 2

Human blastoids on non-hormonally stimulated endometrial layers. Live imaging of human blastoids on non-hormonally stimulated layers of endometrial epithelial cells, and challenged by pipetting liquid in their vicinity. Blastoids do not show attachment.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heidari Khoei, H., Javali, A., Kagawa, H. et al. Generating human blastoids modeling blastocyst-stage embryos and implantation. Nat Protoc (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00802-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00802-1

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research