Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Direct delivery and fast-treated Agrobacterium co-culture (Fast-TrACC) plant transformation methods for Nicotiana benthamiana

Abstract

There is an expanding need to modify plant genomes to create new plant germplasm that advances both basic and applied plant research. Most current methods for plant genome modification involve regenerating plants from genetically modified cells in tissue culture, which is technically challenging, expensive and time consuming, and works with limited plant species or genotypes. Herein, we describe two Agrobacterium-based methods for creating genetic modifications on either sterilely grown or soil-grown Nicotiana benthamiana plants. These methods use developmental regulators (DRs), gene products that influence cell division and differentiation, to induce de novo meristems. Genome editing reagents, such as the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9, may be co-delivered with the DRs to create shoots that transmit edits to the next generation. One method, called fast-treated Agrobacterium co-culture (Fast-TrACC), delivers DRs to seedlings grown aseptically; meristems that produce shoots and ultimately whole plants are induced. The other approach, called direct delivery (DD), involves delivering DRs to soil-grown plants from which existing meristems have been removed; the DRs promote the formation of new shoots at the wound site. With either approach, if transgene cassettes and/or gene editing reagents are provided, these induced, de novo meristems may be transgenic, edited or both. These two methods offer alternative approaches for generating novel plant germplasm that are cheaper and less technically challenging and take less time than standard approaches. The whole procedure from transfer DNA (T-DNA) assembly to recovery of edited plants can be completed in ~70 d for both DD and Fast-TrACC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of procedures.
Fig. 2: Golden Gate assembly of T-DNA vectors.
Fig. 3: DD procedure and sample outcomes.
Fig. 4: Fast-TrACC procedure and sample outcomes.
Fig. 5: Timeline for DD (Procedure 2).
Fig. 6: Timeline for Fast-TrACC (Procedure 3).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data discussed in this protocol are available in the supporting primary research papers (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0337-2) and (https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2020.621710).

References

  1. Altpeter, F. et al. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell 28, 1510–1520 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowe, K. et al. Rapid genotype ‘independent’ Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 54, 240–252 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson-Vasilchik, K., Hague, J., Mookkan, M., Zhang, Z. J. & Kausch, A. Transformation of recalcitrant sorghum varieties facilitated by Baby Boom and Wuschel2. Curr. Protoc. Plant Biol. 3, e20076 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon-Kamm, B. et al. Using morphogenic genes to improve recovery and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plants Basel Switz. 8, 38 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe, K. et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28, 1998–2015 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher, M. F. et al. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 84–89 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie, K., Minkenberg, B. & Yang, Y. Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3570–3575 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Čermák, T. et al. A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell 29, 1196–1217 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber, E., Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Werner, S. & Marillonnet, S. A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PLoS ONE 6, e16765 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baltes, N. J., Gil-Humanes, J., Cermak, T., Atkins, P. A. & Voytas, D. F. DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell 26, 151–163 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon-Kamm, B. et al. Strategies for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: from delivery to production of modified plants. Berleigh Dodds Ser. Agric. Sci. 1–36 (2021).

  13. Ishida, Y., Hiei, Y. & Komari, T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize. Nature 2, 1614–1621 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parrot, W. A. et al. Recovery of primary transformants of soybean. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 615–617 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, B. et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril.] using immature zygotic cotyledon explants. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 1090–1097 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuda, N. et al. Development of an Agrobaterium-mediated transformation method for pear (Pyrus communis L.) with leaf-section and axillary shoot-meristem explants. Plant Cell Rep. 24, 45–51 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Engler, D. E. & Grogan, R. G. Isolation, culture and regeneration of lettuce leaf mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Sci. Lett. 28, 223–229 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, J. et al. Multiplexed, targeted gene editing in Nicotiana benthamiana for glyco-engineering and monoclonalantibody production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 533–542 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Z. et al. High frequency generation of fertile transgenic rice plants after PEG-mediated protoplast transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 8, 276–291 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao, K. S. et al. In planta transformation of pigeon pea: a method to overcome recalcitrancy of the crop to regeneration in vitro. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 14, 321–328 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganguly, S. et al. Development of transgenic pigeonpea using high throughput plumular meristem transformation method. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 135, 73–83 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ganguly, S. et al. Plumular meristem transformation system for chickpea: an efficient method to overcome recalcitrant tissue culture responses. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 142, 493–504 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sparkes, I. A., Runions, J., Kearns, A. & Hawes, C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2019–2025 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barton, M. K. Twenty years on: the inner workings of the shoot apical meristem, a developmental dynamo. Dev. Biol. 341, 95–113 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoerster, G. et al. Use of non-integrating Zm-Wus2 vectors to enhance maize transformation: non-integrating WUS2 enhances transformation. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 56, 265–279 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11–15 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.P.C. was supported by an NSF postdoctoral fellowship in biology (grant no. 2010445). M.F.M. was funded from NIGMS T32-GM008347.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.P.C., M.F.M. and R.A.N. organized and wrote the manuscript. C.G.S. developed the cloning platform for assembly of sgRNA-tRNA modules. M.F.M. and R.A.N. developed the DD and Fast-TrACC methods, respectively. J.C.C. developed molecular reagents. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel F. Voytas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.F.M., R.A.N. and D.F.V. are named inventors on a patent application describing the DD and Fast-TrACC methods, which was filed by the University of Minnesota. D.F.V. consults for Calyxt, an agricultural biotechnology company that uses gene editing to create new crop varieties. All other authors have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Dipankar Chakrabort, Peter Waterhouse and Yongliang Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Maher, M. F. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 84–89 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0337-2

Nasti, R. A. et al. Front. Genome Ed. 2, 621710 (2021): https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2020.621710

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cody, J.P., Maher, M.F., Nasti, R.A. et al. Direct delivery and fast-treated Agrobacterium co-culture (Fast-TrACC) plant transformation methods for Nicotiana benthamiana. Nat Protoc 18, 81–107 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00749-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00749-9

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing