Nf1 mutation disrupts activity-dependent oligodendroglial plasticity and motor learning in mice

Pan, Yuan; Hysinger, Jared D.; Yalçın, Belgin; Lennon, James J.; Byun, Youkyeong Gloria; Raghavan, Preethi; Schindler, Nicole F.; Anastasaki, Corina; Chatterjee, Jit; Ni, Lijun; Xu, Haojun; Malacon, Karen; Jahan, Samin M.; Ivec, Alexis E.; Aghoghovwia, Benjamin E.; Mount, Christopher W.; Nagaraja, Surya; Scheaffer, Suzanne; Attardi, Laura D.; Gutmann, David H.; Monje, Michelle

doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01654-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 30 May 2024

Nf1 mutation disrupts activity-dependent oligodendroglial plasticity and motor learning in mice

Yuan Pan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-8289^1,2,3^na1,
Jared D. Hysinger¹^na1,
Belgin Yalçın ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9689-9062¹^na1,
James J. Lennon¹^na1,
Youkyeong Gloria Byun^1,4,
Preethi Raghavan¹,
Nicole F. Schindler¹,
Corina Anastasaki⁵,
Jit Chatterjee⁵,
Lijun Ni¹,
Haojun Xu¹,
Karen Malacon¹,
Samin M. Jahan¹,
Alexis E. Ivec¹,
Benjamin E. Aghoghovwia ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-1361²,
Christopher W. Mount¹,
Surya Nagaraja¹,
Suzanne Scheaffer⁵,
Laura D. Attardi^6,7,
David H. Gutmann ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-5045⁵ &
…
Michelle Monje ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-237X^1,4

Nature Neuroscience volume 27, pages 1555–1564 (2024)Cite this article

8013 Accesses
51 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Neurogenetic disorders, such as neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), can cause cognitive and motor impairments, traditionally attributed to intrinsic neuronal defects such as disruption of synaptic function. Activity-regulated oligodendroglial plasticity also contributes to cognitive and motor functions by tuning neural circuit dynamics. However, the relevance of oligodendroglial plasticity to neurological dysfunction in NF1 is unclear. Here we explore the contribution of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) to pathological features of the NF1 syndrome in mice. Both male and female littermates (4–24 weeks of age) were used equally in this study. We demonstrate that mice with global or OPC-specific Nf1 heterozygosity exhibit defects in activity-dependent oligodendrogenesis and harbor focal OPC hyperdensities with disrupted homeostatic OPC territorial boundaries. These OPC hyperdensities develop in a cell-intrinsic Nf1 mutation-specific manner due to differential PI3K/AKT activation. OPC-specific Nf1 loss impairs oligodendroglial differentiation and abrogates the normal oligodendroglial response to neuronal activity, leading to impaired motor learning performance. Collectively, these findings show that Nf1 mutation delays oligodendroglial development and disrupts activity-dependent OPC function essential for normal motor learning in mice.

Impaired macroglial development and axonal conductivity contributes to the neuropathology of DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome

Article Open access 19 November 2022

ANKS1B encoded AIDA-1 regulates social behaviors by controlling oligodendrocyte function

Article Open access 21 December 2023

Oligodendrocytic Na⁺-K⁺-Cl^– co-transporter 1 activity facilitates axonal conduction and restores plasticity in the adult mouse brain

Article Open access 26 August 2021

Main

In the central nervous system (CNS), oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) continuously proliferate throughout life, giving rise to oligodendrocytes, which are critical for myelination and the proper function of neural circuits^1,2,3. In many brain regions, OPC division and differentiation are tightly regulated by neuronal activity, thus coupling adaptive myelination to neuronal signal propagation and network function^2,4,5,6. As such, disruption of activity-regulated OPC differentiation results in wide-ranging effects on multiple domains of cognition, including attention, learning and memory^6,7,8,9. For example, genetic inhibition of OPC differentiation results in motor learning deficits on the complex wheel test^7,8.

While neuronal activity-dependent regulation of oligodendroglial dynamics is essential for normal CNS function, the contribution of dysregulated activity-dependent oligodendrogenesis to neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders is just beginning to come to light. Prior studies have shown that activity-regulated OPC proliferation, oligodendrogenesis and myelination are disrupted following chemotherapy, which contributes to chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in mice⁶. Similarly, in rodent models of absence epilepsy, OPC proliferation, oligodendrocyte numbers and myelination are increased within the seizure network, and this aberrantly increased maladaptive myelination contributes to epilepsy progression such that genetic or pharmacological blockade of activity-regulated oligodendrogenesis decreases seizure frequency¹⁰. In another example of dysregulated oligodendroglial precursor proliferation leading to disease, OPCs can serve as a cell of origin for both low- and high-grade gliomas^11,12,13,14.

The contribution of OPCs to both neurological dysfunction and gliomagenesis is particularly germane to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a cancer predisposition syndrome in which affected individuals are also prone to learning, behavioral and motor deficits. Patients with NF1 are born with a germline inactivating mutation in one copy of the NF1 gene (monoallelic or heterozygous NF1 loss) but may acquire a ‘second-hit’ mutation (biallelic NF1 loss) during development in susceptible cell types to induce glioma formation^15,16. In addition to increased brain tumor risk, children with NF1 exhibit impairments in attention, learning, working memory, executive function, motor function and motor learning^17,18,19, which could reflect abnormalities in adaptive myelination^4,6,7,9. Support for dysregulated OPC function in the setting of NF1 derives from several studies: analysis of heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice reveals increased OPC density in the spinal cord²⁰, while Nf1 genetic knockdown in zebrafish results in increased spinal cord OPC proliferation, density and migration²¹. Similarly, using the mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) model, Nf1-null OPCs exhibit increased proliferation and decreased differentiation in vivo²². In this Article, we leveraged optogenetic and behavioral approaches coupled with numerous mouse strains harboring different NF1 patient germline Nf1 gene mutations and OPC-specific Nf1 loss to demonstrate that Nf1 mutation in OPCs disrupts their adaptive responses, impairs oligodendroglial dynamics and results in motor learning deficits.

Impaired Nf1-mutant OPC responses to neuronal activity

To determine how Nf1 mutation might affect the adaptive responses of OPCs to neuronal activity, we generated mice that were genetically wild-type (WT)-equivalent (Nf1^WT: Nf1^+/+, Nf1^fl/+ or Nf1^fl/fl), OPC-specific heterozygous Nf1-mutant (Nf1^OPC-iHet: Nf1^fl/+;Pdgfra::Cre^ER; i, inducible; tamoxifen injected at P24) and OPC-specific Nf1-null (Nf1^OPC-iKO: Nf1^fl/fl;Pdgfra::Cre^ER, tamoxifen injected at P24) (Fig. 1a). Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) carrying hSyn1 promotor-driven channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2-eYFP) were injected into the premotor cortex to achieve neuronal expression of ChR2 (ref. ²³). An optical cannula was then placed above the layer V neurons in the premotor cortex such that action potentials in ChR2-expressing neurons can be stimulated with blue light (Fig. 1b,c). Similar to our previous findings⁴, 20 Hz optogenetic stimulation of premotor circuit (motor planning area) triggers complex motor output in ChR2-expressing mice (circular walking behavior; Supplementary Video 1). During blue light stimulation, mice were given 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) to identify dividing cells. Three hours after optogenetic stimulation, proliferating OPCs (EdU⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells) were measured in frontal white matter projections (cingulum), which contain the axons of the stimulated neurons (Fig. 1c,d).

**Fig. 1: *Nf1*-mutant OPCs lack adaptive proliferative responses to increased neuronal activity.**

As expected for Nf1^WT mice⁴, optogenetically induced neuronal activity increased OPC proliferation ipsilateral to the site of optogenetic neuronal stimulation relative to the contralateral, nonstimulated side of the same mouse (Fig. 1e). During the 3 h following stimulation, newly proliferating OPCs have not yet differentiated into oligodendrocytes (Extended Data Fig. 1a); no microglial reactivity (Extended Data Fig. 1b–d) and few apoptotic cells (Extended Data Fig. 1e,f) were observed. As a control for surgical manipulation and blue light exposure, we expressed eYFP instead of ChR2-eYFP in Nf1^WT mice and observed no change in OPC proliferation following blue light delivery (Extended Data Fig. 1g), indicating that the increase in Nf1^WT OPC proliferation (Fig. 1e) results from optogenetic ChR2 activation of cortical projection neurons and is consistent with our previous findings⁴.

In striking contrast, optogenetically induced neuronal activity did not increase OPC proliferation in OPC-specific Nf1^OPC-iHet or Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (Fig. 1e), demonstrating that both monoallelic and biallelic Nf1 inactivation abrogates the OPC proliferative response to neuronal activity. Notably, the overall density of proliferating OPCs is greater in Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (Fig. 1e) due to a generalized increase in total OPC density in Nf1^OPC-iKO, relative to Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iHet, mouse brains (Extended Data Figs. 1h and 2a,b). This biallelic Nf1 inactivation-induced increase in OPC density is consistent with previous findings demonstrating that Nf1-null OPCs exhibit increased proliferation²². Collectively, our findings reveal that Nf1-mutant OPCs lack the expected adaptive proliferative response to neuronal activity, and support a causative role for Nf1 in regulating the homeostatic density of OPCs, which is strictly maintained in the healthy brain²⁴.

Deficiency in experience-regulated oligodendrogenesis

Since Nf1 mutation leads to OPC dysregulation, we next asked whether Nf1 inactivation impairs OPC responses to neuronal activity in the context of motor learning as measured using the complex wheel test. The complex wheel has unevenly spaced rungs (Fig. 2a), requiring motor learning in order for the mouse to remain on the wheel. As mice learn, they run increasingly faster for the duration of the observation period⁷. This motor skill learning task induces OPC proliferation and the generation of new oligodendrocytes, and this activity-regulated oligodendrogenesis is necessary for complex wheel motor learning^7,8.

**Fig. 2: *Nf1*-deficient OPCs exhibit impaired experience-induced oligodendrogenesis.**

Since loss of either one or both Nf1 alleles in OPCs abrogates activity-regulated OPC proliferation (Fig. 1e), we hypothesized that Nf1 mutation might also impair experience- and activity-regulated oligodendrogenesis. To evaluate this possibility, Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice were given EdU in their drinking water during the complex wheel test to trace OPC proliferation and differentiation (Fig. 2a). At the end of 7 days of complex wheel training, we analyzed the percentage of newly proliferated OPCs (EdU⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells) and newly generated oligodendrocytes (OLs; EdU⁺/ASPA⁺ cells) in the cingulum, where dense axonal tracks of the motor cortex reside (Fig. 2b). Consistent with previous studies^7,8, Nf1^WT mice following complex wheel training harbor increased numbers of new oligodendrocytes without any change in EdU-labeled OPC content at this time point (Fig. 2c), indicating that in healthy mice this motor learning experience increases oligodendrogenesis in the cingulum and that by this time point OPCs that proliferated in response to the motor learning paradigm have differentiated into oligodendrocytes. In striking contrast, at the end of the test, mice with Nf1-null OPCs exhibit increased numbers of EdU-labeled OPCs, consistent with the overall increase in proliferating OPCs, and fewer new oligodendrocytes relative to their WT counterparts (Fig. 2d,e). No apoptosis (Extended Data Fig. 2c) after complex wheel training was detected at the time point examined to account for the observed reduction in new oligodendrocytes generated. Taken together, these data support a critical role for the Nf1 gene in OPC differentiation and demonstrate a deficit in experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in Nf1-null OPCs.

Nf1 loss generates OPC hyperdensities via PI3K/AKT activity

To determine whether monoallelic Nf1 inactivation also leads to deficits in experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis, we next analyzed OPC dynamics in Nf1^OPC-Het (Nf1^fl/+;Pdgfra::Cre) mice at the end of the 7-day complex wheel test. Interestingly, we observed focal areas containing increased OPC density (focal OPC hyperdensities) throughout the brains of Nf1^OPC-Het mice (Fig. 3a), a finding indicative of impaired control of OPC density²⁴. These focal OPC hyperdensities were also present in Nf1^OPC-iHet mice (Nf1^fl/+;Pdgfra::Cre^ER, tamoxifen injected at P24) not subjected to the complex wheel testing (Extended Data Fig. 2d,e), suggesting that formation of focal OPC hyperdensities is not a motor learning-driven event. OPC density within the focal OPC hyperdensities of OPC-specific Nf1-heterozygous mice is similar to that observed globally in the brains of Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (Extended Data Fig. 2e). In addition to the forebrain, focal OPC hyperdensities were also found in the hindbrains of Nf1^+/− mice, more often seen in the brainstem than the cerebellum (Extended Data Fig. 2f,g). These findings raise the intriguing idea that these regions of OPC hyperdensity, in which the normal OPC territorial boundaries²⁴ are not respected, represent areas in which OPCs have lost expression of the remaining functional Nf1 allele (Nf1-null OPCs).

**Fig. 3: Monoallelic *Nf1* inactivation generates focal OPC hyperdensities with defective experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis.**

Within these focal OPC hyperdensities, no changes in the density of microglia (Iba1⁺ cells), reactive microglia (CD68⁺/Iba1⁺ cells) or reactive astrocytes (Cxcl10⁺/Sox9⁺ cells) were observed (Extended Data Fig. 3a–c). We also did not detect senescent cells (p21⁺ cells) or apoptotic cells (TUNEL⁺ cells) within these focal OPC hyperdensities (Extended Data Fig. 3d). The size of the focal OPC hyperdensities appears to increase with age (Fig. 3b–d). We found a transient increase in OPC proliferation in small focal OPC hyperdensities at 5 weeks, but not at 24 weeks, of age compared to regions with normal OPC density in the same brains (Extended Data Fig. 4a–d). Whereas the ability of OPCs to generate new oligodendrocytes (evidenced by EdU tracing) is reduced in the focal OPC hyperdensities relative to nonhyperdense areas (Extended Data Fig. 4e), the density of mature oligodendrocytes inside and outside of the focal OPC hyperdensities did not differ in adult mice (Fig. 3e). In contrast, mice harboring monoallelic inactivation of other tumor suppressor genes (for example, Trp53, Pten and Rb1) did not exhibit focal OPC hyperdensities (Extended Data Fig. 5), establishing this phenotype as unique to NF1.

As a GTPase-activating protein, one of the main functions of the NF1 protein (neurofibromin) is to negatively regulate RAS activity. Using mice in which constitutively active KRAS is targeted to oligodendroglial lineage cells (Kras^LSL-G12D;Olig2::Cre), KRAS hyperactivation phenocopies Nf1 loss (Fig. 3f), indicating that increased KRAS activity is sufficient to induce focal OPC hyperdensities. To determine whether KRAS is necessary for inducing focal OPC hyperdensities in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice, we engineered Kras haploinsufficiency in the Nf1-mutant mice. Whereas Kras haploinsufficiency normalizes Nf1 mutation-induced RAS hyperactivation and does not induce OPC hyperdensities on its own (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c), Kras haploinsufficiency fails to reduce the size of the focal OPC hyperdensities in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice (Extended Data Fig. 6c). Taken together, these findings suggest that oncogenic RAS hyperactivation in OPCs is sufficient to generate OPC hyperdensities but is not fully responsible for OPC hyperdensity formation in Nf1-mutant mice.

These findings indicating sufficiency but not necessity prompted us to further explore the causative etiology underlying OPC dysfunction in Nf1-mutant mice. First, we leveraged a collection of Nf1-mutant mouse strains harboring different heterozygous NF1 patient-derived germline Nf1 gene mutations. Using this approach, we identified one line (Nf1^+/C383X) that developed OPC hyperdensities similar to the Nf1-heterozygous mice engineered by inserting a neomycin cassette into exon 31 of the Nf1 gene (Nf1^+/neo), while three other lines (Nf1^+/R1809C, Nf1^+/G848R and Nf1^+/R1276P) did not exhibit OPC hyperdensities (Fig. 4a). In all of these NF1 model mouse strains, irrespective of OPC hyperdensity development, RAS activity is elevated^25,26,27. Second, we examined PI3K-AKT signaling, which is also dysregulated in Nf1-mutant cells^28,29,30. Examining AKT activity levels in brain lysates from WT and Nf1-mutant mice, we found that, relative to WT mice, AKT activity was increased by >2-fold in Nf1^+/neo and Nf1^+/C383X mice that form OPC hyperdensities but was largely not changed in Nf1^+/R1809C, Nf1^+/G848R or Nf1^+/R1276P mice that harbor few or tiny OPC hyperdensities (Fig. 4b). Consistently, in OPCs derived from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with NF1 mutations, only OPCs with the NF1^C383X, but not the NF1^R1809C, mutation exhibited elevated AKT activity relative to their WT controls (Fig. 4c). Third, we demonstrate that in vivo pharmacological PI3K/AKT inhibition using NVP-BKM120 reduced the OPC hyperdensity-affected area in the brains of Nf1^+/neo mice (Fig. 4d). Taken together, these data suggest that differential AKT activation underlies the development of OPC hyperdensities in Nf1-mutant mice.

**Fig. 4: Heterozygous *Nf1*-mutant mouse brains contain focal OPC hyperdensities whose formation is *Nf1* mutation and PI3K dependent.**

Impaired adaptive oligodendrogenesis in OPC hyperdensities

To determine whether OPCs within the focal OPC hyperdensities of Nf1^OPC-Het mice exhibit the same activity-dependent defects seen in Nf1^OPC-iKO mice, we quantified new OPCs and new oligodendrocytes in the cingulum of Nf1^OPC-Het mice at the end of the complex wheel test (Fig. 3a). Whereas the OPCs in regions of normal OPC density behave similarly to Nf1^WT OPCs, OPCs within focal OPC hyperdensities display impaired oligodendrogenesis at the end of the complex wheel test (Extended Data Fig. 7a) similar to Nf1-null OPCs (Fig. 2d,e).

Since the experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis deficits within focal OPC hyperdensities of Nf1^OPC-Het mice are similar to those observed in Nf1-null OPCs, we postulated that these hyperdense OPCs probably exhibit Nf1 loss of heterozygosity, resulting in reduced levels of Nf1 mRNA and protein. Unfortunately, few reagents (probes and antibodies) currently exist to accurately quantitate Nf1 RNA/protein by in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry. We first evaluated multiple commercially available or laboratory-generated Nf1 probes and antibodies without success. We next performed spatial transcriptomic analysis, which allows for evaluation of regional RNA expression, in OPC hyperdensities relative to areas lacking these hyperdensities in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice (Extended Data Fig. 7b). While Nf1 mRNA copy numbers in the brain were too low to evaluate differential expression, we detected increased expression of four genes (Ttr, Enpp2, Rarres2 and Ecrg4) in the focal OPC hyperdensities relative to regions lacking focal OPC hyperdensities (Extended Data Fig. 7c). Many of the candidates we identified in the spatial transcriptomics analysis have been previously implicated in oligodendroglial lineage function. First, transthyretin (Ttr) is expressed by OPCs and has been reported to promote both OPC proliferation and differentiation³¹. Second, ECRG4 augurin precursor (ECRG4) is a hormone-like peptide that induces OPC senescence³². Third, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 2 (ENPP2) induces the differentiation of OPCs from Olig2⁺ precursor cells in the developing zebrafish hindbrain³³. Notably, ENPP6, another member of the ENPP family, serves as a marker of motor learning (complex wheel)-induced oligodendrogenesis⁸. Immunofluorescence (IF) and in situ hybridization validation of the spatial transcriptomic data revealed increased areas of Ecrg4 (IF), Enpp2 (IF) and Ttr (in situ hybridization) signal in regions of focal OPC hyperdensities within Nf1^+/− mouse brains relative to brain regions lacking focal OPC hyperdensities (Extended Data Fig. 7d,e).

Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Nf1 loss leads to the development of focal OPC hyperdensities, within which OPCs exhibit defective experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis and dysregulated oligodendroglial gene expression relevant to OPC function.

Nf1-mutant mice exhibit delayed oligodendroglial development

After observing that Nf1 loss leads to defective experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis, we next asked whether baseline oligodendrogenesis is affected by Nf1 loss in OPCs using EdU lineage tracing. In both 1-month-old and 4-month-old Nf1^OPC-iKO mice, we observed increased OPC proliferation and reduced differentiation relative to Nf1^WT mice, with smaller differences in the 4-month-old mice (Extended Data Fig. 8a,b). We next examined oligodendroglial lineage progression in OPCs isolated from Nf1^OPC-iKO and Nf1^WT pups. Using a standard OPC differentiation assay, Nf1 loss (both monoallelic and biallelic) in OPCs decreases oligodendrogenesis in vitro (Fig. 5a,b).

Given the impaired OPC differentiation phenotype observed in Nf1-mutant OPCs, we quantified oligodendrocytes in developing and adult mice. At 1 month of age, Nf1^OPC-iKO mice exhibited reduced overall oligodendrocyte density compared to the Nf1^WT mice (Fig. 5c). This difference was no longer evident at 4 months of age (Fig. 5d). These findings indicate an impairment in developmental oligodendrogenesis that compensates by adulthood and suggests that the increased overall number of OPCs in Nf1^OPC-iKO mice may gradually compensate for their reduced capacity for oligodendrogenesis. Concordantly, by 4 months of age, we did not observe differences in myelination (number of myelinated axons and myelin sheath thickness) in the cingulum or corpus callosum of Nf1^OPC-iKO mice, as assessed by electron microscopy (Extended Data Fig. 8c–e), nor did we find differences in myelin or density of oligodendrocytes of adult Nf1^+/− mice (Extended Data Fig. 8f,g). The volume of the cingulum and corpus callosum was equivalent in Nf1-mutant and WT mice at all time points examined (Extended Data Fig. 8d,h).

Collectively, no gross deficits in baseline oligodendrocyte density or myelination were observed in Nf1-mutant mice at the age at which the complex wheel test was performed. We postulate that normal myelination is achieved by adulthood in Nf1-mutant mice, whereas activity-regulated oligodendrogenesis remains impaired. These data suggest that baseline abnormalities in OPC proliferation and differentiation contribute to the OPC/oligodendrocyte phenotype observed in Nf1-mutant mice following testing on the complex wheel and that failure of the activity-related response means that neuronal activity does not overcome this oligodendrogenesis deficit.

Nf1 loss in OPCs results in motor skill learning deficits

Since Nf1 loss leads to deficient experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis (Fig. 2d,e and Extended Data Fig. 7a), we next sought to determine whether OPC-specific Nf1 loss causes impaired motor learning in adult mice. Before evaluating motor learning, we first assessed baseline motor function and found that the Nf1^OPC-Het mice lack abnormalities in overall motor function, including stride length, paw intensity and swing speed during normal gait (Extended Data Fig. 9a). This was important to confirm, as germline heterozygous Nf1 loss (Nf1^+/⁻ mice) results in motor function deficits (Extended Data Fig. 9b).

Focusing on complex wheel performance (measured as running velocity) as a function of running distance, we found that all Nf1^OPC-Het mice, when grouped together, exhibit similar motor performance as their Nf1^WT counterparts (Fig. 6a). As the hyperdense OPC areas in Nf1^OPC-Het mice exhibit impaired experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis (Extended Data Fig. 7a), we correlated focal OPC hyperdensity size and location with mouse motor performance. Nf1^OPC-Het mice with more focal OPC hyperdensities within the cingulum exhibit lower running speeds at the end of the complex wheel test (6.5 and 7 km in running distance) (Fig. 6b,c). This finding indicates that the degree of focal OPC hyperdensities in subcortical motor projections inversely correlates with motor learning, consistent with the result described above demonstrating that experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis is impaired in these focal OPC hyperdensities (Extended Data Fig. 7a).

**Fig. 6: *Nf1* inactivation in OPCs results in motor learning deficits.**

Given that OPCs within focal OPC hyperdensities of Nf1^OPC-Het mice behave like Nf1-null OPCs, we evaluated the hypothesis that biallelic Nf1 inactivation in OPCs impairs motor learning. Baseline gait analyses demonstrated that Nf1^OPC-iKO mice do not differ from Nf1^WT mice with respect to swing speed, stride length or paw intensity (Extended Data Fig. 9c). During the complex wheel test, both Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice increased their running velocity. However, Nf1^OPC-iKO mice exhibited slower velocities than Nf1^WT controls toward the end of the test (6.5- and 7-km running distance; Fig. 6d,e), illustrating impaired motor learning concordant with the impaired experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis shown above (Fig. 2d,e). Taken together, these results establish that OPC-specific Nf1 biallelic inactivation leads to motor learning deficits.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that heterozygous Nf1-mutant and Nf1-null OPCs lack appropriate proliferative responses to neuronal activity and Nf1-deficient OPCs exhibit impairments in experience-induced oligodendrogenesis. In the brains of OPC-specific heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice, we identified focal OPC hyperdensities where OPCs within these hyperdensities exhibit impaired experience-induced oligodendrogenesis. Moreover, Nf1 loss in OPCs alone is sufficient to cause motor learning deficits. Collectively, our findings provide a mechanistic connection between oligodendroglial plasticity and cognitive function in a neurogenetic disorder, raising several key points relevant to NF1 and OPC function.

First, neuronal activity is known to regulate OPC proliferation, oligodendrogenesis and myelination, which in turn mediates optimal circuit dynamics and several domains of neurological function, including attention, motor function, motor learning, spatial learning and memory consolidation^6,7,8,9. Our group has previously demonstrated that optogenetically induced neuronal activity in the motor planning region (premotor, M2) increases OPC proliferation and oligodendrogenesis, leading to increased myelination of the cingulum and corpus callosum and improved motor function⁴. Using a similar in vivo optogenetic paradigm herein, we found that neither heterozygous Nf1-mutant nor Nf1-null OPCs exhibit proper neuronal activity-induced proliferation, suggesting that Nf1 mutation disrupts the cellular/molecular mechanisms used by OPCs to sense and/or respond to activity-dependent signals. Since neuronal activity-regulated oligodendroglial responses support adaptive myelination to fine-tune circuit dynamics, the failure of Nf1-mutant OPCs to respond to neuronal activity implies that compromised oligodendroglial plasticity may partially contribute to the learning difficulties common in individuals with NF1.

In children with NF1, diffusion tensor imaging studies of white matter reveal differences in fractional anisotropy within the corpus callosum and cingulum compared to the control group; such differences were detected only during childhood (1–12 years of age) and not at adolescent ages³⁴. These findings suggest delayed myelination during childhood that catches up later in adulthood. Supporting this hypothesis, we found reduced oligodendrocyte numbers in young (1-month-old) Nf1-mutant mice that normalize by adulthood. It is important to note that oligodendroglial cells also play myelin-independent roles, including axonal pruning³⁵, synaptic pruning^36,37, potassium buffering³⁸ and antigen presentation³⁹; Nf1 mutations in OPCs could also affect these noncanonical oligodendroglial functions.

In the experience-dependent motor learning paradigm (complex wheel test), OPC-specific heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice show normal motor learning, whereas OPC-specific Nf1-null mice exhibit impaired motor learning. One plausible explanation for the motor learning difference between the heterozygous Nf1-mutant and Nf1-null conditions is that the complex wheel test-induced neuronal activity in the motor cortex (for example, both M1 and M2) is sufficient to induce some adaptive oligodendroglial changes in heterozygous Nf1-mutant but not in Nf1-null oligodendroglial cells. Notably, these two different models display baseline differences in their OPC populations: heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice show comparable OPC density to WT controls outside of hyperdense foci, whereas Nf1-null mice exhibit higher OPC density globally throughout their brains. It should be noted that not all newly generated oligodendrocytes derive from new OPC proliferation but by direct OPC differentiation without prior proliferation⁸. Additionally, existing oligodendrocytes can remodel myelin (for example, myelin sheath length) in response to neuronal activity^40,41, underscoring the numerous mechanisms by which neuronal activity can modulate myelination; we have not assessed such potential myelin remodeling aspects of myelin plasticity in this study.

Activity-regulated oligodendroglial responses contribute to several cognitive functions, many of which are impaired in people with NF1, including attention, learning and memory^6,7,8,9. Our findings show that mice with Nf1-mutant OPCs exhibit impaired responses to neuronal activity and consequent defective motor learning. While prior cell type-specific genetic mouse modeling studies demonstrated that Nf1 loss in neurons causes spatial learning deficits⁴², it was unclear whether other neurological processes that oligodendroglial plasticity modulates (for example, attention, short-term memory and spatial learning) are similarly disrupted by Nf1 mutation in OPCs. In this regard, we observed that larger focal OPC hyperdensities within the cingulum, which is critical for motor cortex function, correlate with poorer motor learning. These findings suggest a model where several neuronal circuits may be partially disrupted by the focal OPC hyperdensities, creating a potential threshold for the development or progression of neurological deficits.

The elucidation of an oligodendroglial-based mechanism for cognitive impairment in NF1 also suggests new potential therapeutic avenues focused on restoring adaptive oligodendroglial responses. Coupled with previous work demonstrating that a TrkB agonist, which induces oligodendrogenesis, rescues chemotherapy-induced impairment in oligodendroglial plasticity and cognitive function⁶ and that clemastine, which promotes oligodendrogenesis, rescues social isolation-induced deficits in adaptive myelination and social avoidance⁴³, these findings support the concept that therapies that promote OPC differentiation could potentially be leveraged to treat cognitive deficits in individuals with NF1.

Second, the germline NF1 mutation (monoallelic inactivation) affects all cell types in the body of individuals with this neurogenetic disorder; however, subsequent second-hit events (for example, NF1 loss of heterozygosity) involving the one remaining functional NF1 allele (biallelic inactivation) in specific cell types contribute to many NF1 clinical manifestations. Depending on the cell types affected, monoallelic and biallelic NF1 inactivation can both be pathogenic. Using genetically engineered mice to model NF1, previous studies revealed that monoallelic inactivation of Nf1 in inhibitory neurons leads to deficits in spatial learning⁴². In contrast, the NF1-associated corpus callosum enlargement was observed only with biallelic, but not monoallelic, Nf1 inactivation in neural stem cells⁴⁴. It is thus important to study the function of NF1 in a cell type-specific manner and to investigate the effects of both monoallelic and biallelic NF1 inactivation. In this study, we found that Nf1^OPC-iKO (biallelic NF1 loss) mice exhibit impaired motor learning, while motor learning performance in Nf1^OPC-Het (monoallelic NF1 loss) mice depends on the size and location of the focal OPC hyperdensities. Our findings also underscore the contribution of biallelic Nf1 inactivation to more severe CNS deficits associated with NF1.

The discrete appearance of focal OPC hyperdensities in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mouse brains is reminiscent of the T2 hyperintensities (focal areas of signal intensity, FASI) detected on magnetic resonance imaging of children with NF1 (ref. ⁴⁵). Prior histological analyses of the brains of three patients with FASI uncovered vacuolar changes suggestive of myelin disruption⁴⁶. However, the cellular identity of FASI remains inconclusive so far. The OPC density and the experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis deficits of OPCs within focal OPC hyperdensities of heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice are similar to the behavior of Nf1-null OPCs, suggesting that OPCs within focal OPC hyperdensities probably exhibit Nf1 loss of heterozygosity. In support of this idea, OPC-specific Nf1 loss of heterozygosity induced in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice by Cre-mediated chromosomal recombination (MADM) results in regional increases in OPC proliferation²².

Third, the finding that some, but not all, germline Nf1 mutations result in the formation of OPC hyperdensities suggests differential effects of the mutation on oligodendroglial lineage biology. In this respect, there are Nf1 mutation-specific effects, which are not accounted for by neurofibromin regulation of RAS, as all Nf1 mutations examined lead to increased RAS activity. In contrast, the germline Nf1 mutations associated with OPC hyperdensity formation result in increased PI3K/AKT signaling, suggesting additional functions of neurofibromin in maintaining PI3K/AKT homeostasis independent of RAS hyperactivation alone. Importantly, these observations dissociate OPC hyperdensity from optic glioma formation in that some strains that do not generate focal OPC abnormalities still form optic gliomas (R1278X)⁴⁷. Future investigation will be required to define the mechanism by which germline Nf1 mutations differentially regulate PI3K/AKT activation in OPCs.

Last, NF1 is both a neurological disorder and a cancer predisposition syndrome. It is conceivable that the focal OPC hyperdensities represent preneoplastic regions at risk of transforming into gliomas. To this end, inactivating both Nf1 and Trp53 transforms OPCs into high-grade gliomas¹⁴. It is therefore possible that Nf1 inactivation primes OPCs for neoplastic transformation by increasing proliferation and decreasing oligodendrogenesis, while Trp53 inactivation is required to inhibit the senescence program in Nf1-null OPCs²² and facilitate gliomagenesis. Given that adult patients with NF1 have a higher chance of developing high-grade gliomas than observed in the general population^48,49, it is likely that these focal OPC hyperdensities serve as a preneoplastic pool of glioma-initiating cells that transform into glioma when mutations in other glioma driver genes (for example, Trp53) co-occur.

Conclusion

Oligodendroglial plasticity is critical for proper neurological function in the healthy brain, and we now demonstrate that adaptive OPC responses are disrupted by NF1 mutations in the neurogenetic disorder NF1, which impairs oligodendroglial dynamics and results in motor learning deficits.

Methods

Mice

All mice were used in accordance with an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol at Stanford University and Washington University. All mice were maintained on a C57/BL6 background. Mice were housed with free access to water and food according to the university’s guidelines in 12-h light/12-h dark cycles. The housing rooms are kept at a set point of 20–26 °C, with humidity ranging from 30% to 70%. Littermates (4–24 weeks of age) were used without selection for sexes. No obvious sex-dependent effect was observed. Nf1^WT (Nf1^fl/fl, Nf1^fl/+ or Nf1^+/+) and heterozygous Nf1-mutant (Nf1^fl/mut or Nf1^+/mut) mice were generated previously^50,51,52,53 and bred with Pdgfra::Cre^ER (Jackson Laboratory, 018280) or Pdgfra::Cre mice (Jackson Laboratory, 013148) to induce OPC-specific Nf1 inactivation. Nf1^+/C383X, Nf1^+/R1809C, Nf1^+/G848R or Nf1^+/R1276P mice were generated previously^47,54,55. Kras^LSL-G12D mice (courtesy of Dr. Laura Attardi) were bred with the Olig2::Cre mice (025567). Trp53^+/⁻ (002101), Pten^+/⁻ (42059) and Kras^+/⁻ (008179) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory; Rb1^+/fl mice (courtesy of Dr. Julien Sage)⁵⁶ were bred with the Pdgfra::Cre^ER mice. To induce Cre^ER-mediated Nf1 inactivation, mice were administered tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich T5648, 100 mg kg⁻¹, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) for 4 consecutive days (optogenetic and complex wheel experiments) or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich H6278, 50 mg kg⁻¹, i.p.) for 5 consecutive days (immunohistochemistry analyses in Extended Data Fig. 3). NVP-BKM120 (PI3K inhibitor; 50 mg kg⁻¹ daily; Selleckchem S2247) was administered to P23 Nf1^+/neo mice by oral gavage for 14 days.

Optogenetic stimulation

AAV-DJ-hSyn-hChR2(H134R)-eYFP (virus titer: 1.5 × 10¹² vg ml⁻¹) and AAV-DJ-hSyn-eYFP (virus titer: 2.2 × 10¹² vg ml⁻¹) were obtained from Stanford Gene Vector and Virus Core. One microliter of virus was unilaterally injected into the premotor cortex (from bregma anterior-posterior (AP), +1.00 mm; medial-lateral (ML), −0.5 mm; dorsal-ventral (DV), −0.7 mm) of 4-week-old mice under 1–4% isoflurane anesthesia on a stereotactic surgery rig. Optic cannula was placed over premotor cortex (from bregma AP, +1.00 mm; ML, −0.5 mm; DV, −0.5 mm) and secured with dental cement. Four weeks after the surgeries, animals were connected to a 473-nm diode-pumped solid-state laser system with a monofiber patch cord. To optogenetically stimulate the premotor cortex, pulses of blue light were administered at 20 Hz, 50 ms pulse length, with alternating 30-s-light 2-min recovery periods. ChR2-expressing, but not YFP-expressing, mice exhibited unidirectional circling behavior when the blue light was on. During stimulation sessions, light was administered for 30 min, and mice were perfused 3 h after the start of the stimulation session. To label the dividing cells, all mice were injected i.p. with EdU (40 mg kg⁻¹) for all the stimulation sessions.

Immunohistochemistry

Mice were anesthetized with 2.5% avertin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and transcardially perfused with PBS. The brain was removed and placed into 4% paraformaldehyde for 16–24 h at 4 °C, followed by 30% sucrose in PBS. Coronal floating brain sections (40 μm) were obtained, blocked with 3% normal donkey serum in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibody incubation (1% normal donkey serum in TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100) follows, either for 4 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. The brain sections were then washed in TBS, followed by secondary antibody incubation (1% normal donkey serum in TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100) for 2–4 h at room temperature, then mounted with prolong gold (Invitrogen P36930).

Primary antibodies used: goat anti-PDGFRα (1:250–1:500, R&D AF1062), rabbit anti-Olig2 (1:500, Abcam ab109186), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:500, Abcam ab15580), rat anti-MBP (1:250, Abcam ab7349), chicken anti-GFP (1:500, Abcam Ab13970), rabbit anti-ASPA (1:250, EMD Millipore ABN1698), mouse anti-ECRG4 (1:250, OriGene TA320049), rabbit anti-ENPP2 (1:200, Invitrogen PA5-85221), rat anti-CD68 (1:200, Abcam ab53444), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:1,000, Wako Chemicals 019-19741), goat anti-Olig2 (1:500, Novus Bio AF2418), rat anti-MBP (1:250, Abcam ab7349) and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology 9664). Secondary antibodies used: donkey anti-goat 488 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 705-545-147), donkey anti-goat 594 (1:500, Jackson Immunoresearch 705-585-003), donkey anti-goat 647 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 705-605-147), donkey anti-rabbit 594 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-585-152), donkey anti-rabbit 647 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-605-152), donkey anti-rabbit 488 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-545-152), donkey anti-chicken 488 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 703-545-155) and donkey anti-rat 647 (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch 712-605-150). Images were taken using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2, a Zeiss LSM 700 or a Zeiss 980 scanning confocal microscope and quantified using ImageJ (v 2.0.0).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

To obtain fresh frozen brain samples for RNAscope, mice were intracardially perfused with PBS. The brains were embedded and frozen in the optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Tissue-Tek). The fresh frozen brains were sectioned into 12-µm slices, which were attached to Tissue Path Superfrost Plus Gold Slides (Fisher Scientific 15-188-48). The slides were stored at −20 °C for 1 h to dry the brain slices. Then, the slides were stored at −80 °C until use. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using the RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Reagent kit v2-Mm (ACDBio 323100) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. To visualize amplified RNA signals, Opal 520, 570 and 690 reagents (Akoya Biosciences FP1487001KT, FP1488001KT and FP1497001KT) were used. Then, the brain slices were mounted with prolong gold (Invitrogen P36930). Probes used were Mm Pdgfra-C2/-C3 (ACDBio 480661-C2/480661-C3), Mm-Ttr (ACDbio 424171), Mm-Cxcl10-C2 (ACDbio 408921-C2) and Mm-Sox9 (ACDbio 401051). Images were taken using a Zeiss 800 and Zeiss 980 confocal microscope and analyzed using Fiji (v 2.3.0/1.53q).

To measure Ttr area, the threshold was adjusted to Ttr fluorescence signal. To get consistent data, the same threshold value was used for all images. To quantify the number of reactive astrocytes, Cxcl10 and Sox9 double-positive cells were counted. Only the 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole covered with over four dots of Cxcl10 and Sox9 signal was counted as a reactive astrocyte. For both Ttr and reactive astrocyte experiment, fewer than four Pdgfra⁺ cells or more than six Pdgfra⁺ cells in the region of interest were considered as nonhyperdensity or OPC hyperdensity areas, respectively.

Complex wheel test

Mice (15 weeks of age) were individually housed with the complex wheel with water (supplemented with 0.2 mg ml⁻¹ EdU) and food. The training sessions for the complex wheel test are conducted over 7 days. The animals have free access to the wheel, water and food during the entire session. Complex wheels with dimensions previously described were constructed from laser-cut acrylic and assembled in laser-cut acrylic housings⁷. Wheels were mounted on stainless-steel axles with polytetrafluoroethylene bearings. Rung arrangements were configured as previously described⁷. To measure wheel speed, infrared distance sensors were mounted above each wheel to identify the movement of individual rungs across the sensor path during the wheel’s rotation. Analog output from these sensors was logged along with timestamps using an Arduino. Up to six wheels were active simultaneously per experiment, and the speed of Nf1^WT mice does not differ among wheels, indicating similar performance of the wheels. Further hardware specifications are available upon request.

Logged data from the Arduino-based monitoring system were processed in Matlab. The rotation of individual wheel rungs across the sensor path (rung intercepts) was identified via Matlab’s ‘findpeaks’ function. The data were then filtered to periods of active wheel rotation, defined as periods where rung intercepts occurred at less than 2-s intervals. One full revolution of each wheel was identified by a series of rung intercepts equal to the total number of rungs per wheel. The cumulative distance traveled by each mouse over the total number of revolutions in each experiment was calculated using the circumference of each wheel. Using a sliding window of size equal to the number of rungs per wheel, wheel speed was estimated by dividing the wheel circumference over the total time elapsed within a given sliding window. These values were then initially smoothed by moving average over 100-revolution intervals. Subsequently, average velocities were calculated and reported over a defined distance interval, such that mouse-to-mouse comparisons were made on the basis of total distance traveled. The code for complex wheel test analyses is available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10864194).

Transmission electron microscopy

Mice were killed and perfused with PBS followed by the Karnovsky’s fixative (2% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate). The samples were kept in Karnovsky’s fixative for more than 3 weeks, then post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (EMS 19100) for 2 h at room temperature, washed three times with ultrafiltered water and then en bloc stained 1% uranyl acetate (EMS 541-09-3) overnight at 4 °C. Samples were then dehydrated in graded ethanol (30%, 50%, 75% and 95%) for 15 min each at 4 °C; the samples were then allowed to equilibrate to room temperature and were rinsed in 100% ethanol two times, followed by propylene oxide (EMS 20401) for 15 min. Samples were infiltrated with EMbed-812 resin (EMS 14120) mixed 1:1 with propylene oxide for 2 h followed by 2:1 EMbed-812/propylene oxide for 2 h. The samples were then placed into EMbed-812 for 2 h and then placed into TAAB capsules filled with fresh resin, which were then placed into a 65 °C oven overnight. Sections were taken at 80 nm on a Leica Ultracut S (Leica) and mounted on 100 mesh Cu grids (EMS FCF100-Cu). Grids were contrast stained for 30 s in 3.5% uranyl acetate in 50% acetone followed by staining in 0.2% lead citrate for 2 min. Samples were imaged using a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope at 120 kV, and images were collected using a Gatan Orius digital camera.

The g-ratio, defined as the axonal diameter in its short axis divided by the diameter of the entire fiber in the same axis (axonal diameter/axonal diameter + myelin sheath), was measured using ImageJ. A total of 54–209 myelinated axons were quantified for each animal from 2–10 ×6,000 transmission electron micrographs. The number of myelinated axons was quantified from 16–25 ×6,000 transmission electron micrographs.

Human iPS cell-induced OPCs

Human iPS cells were CRISPR–Cas9-engineered to harbor patient-derived NF1 mutations as previously described by the Washington University Genome Engineering and iPSC Core Facility (GEiC)⁵⁴. Human iPS cells were differentiated into hiPSC-derived OPCs (iOPCs) as previously described⁵⁷. Briefly, iPS cells were induced into embryoid bodies by seeding 40,000 iPS cells at the bottoms of ultralow cell attachment U-bottom 96-well plates, and incubating them for 5 days in neural induction medium (NIM) (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM)/F12, 1% nonessential amino acids and 1× N-2 supplement). Subsequently, the embryoid bodies were transferred onto poly-l-ornithine/laminin-coated six-well plates and incubated for 11 days in NIM supplemented with 20 ng ml⁻¹ bFGF (PeproTech) and 2 µg ml⁻¹ heparin (STEMCELL Technologies); 3 days in NIM supplemented with 100 nM retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich); 7 days in NIM supplemented with 100 nM retinoic acid, 1 µM purmorphamine (STEMCELL Technologies) and 1 × B-27; and then 11 days in NIM supplemented with 10 ng ml⁻¹ bFGF, 1 µM purmorphamine and 1 × B-27. For OPC maturation and maintenance, the OPC colonies were incubated for 120 additional days in glial induction medium (DMEM/F12, 1× N1 (Sigma-Aldrich), 1× B27, 60 ng ml⁻¹ T3, 100 ng ml⁻¹ biotin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 µM cAMP (PeproTech)) supplemented with 10 ng ml⁻¹ PDGF-AA, 10 ng ml⁻¹ IGF-1 and 10 ng ml⁻¹ NT3.

Mouse OPC culture and differentiation assay

P4-5 mouse pups were rapidly decapitated and brains were processed in Hibernate-A medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A12475-01). Resulting tissue was enzymatically disassociated in buffer containing HEPES–Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with DNase (Worthington Biochemical LS002007) and Liberase (Roche Applied Sciences 05401054001) at 37 °C on a rotator. Then, tissue mixture was triturated with a 1,000-μl tip and passed through a 100-μm cell strainer. OPCs were isolated using the CD140 (PDGFRα) Microbead kit (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec 130-101-502) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 30,000 cells were seeded per well, on laminin-coated (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 23017015) cover slips in a 24-well plate. OPC proliferation medium containing DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11320082), GlutaMAX (Invitrogen, 35050-061), sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen, 11360070), MEM nonessential amino acids (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11140076), antibiotic–antimytotic (Gibco), N21-MAX (R&D systems, AR012), trace elements B (Corning, 25-022-Cl), 5 mg ml⁻¹ N-acetyl cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich, A9165), 10 ng ml⁻¹ PDGF-AA (Shenandoah Biotechnology, 200-54), 10 ng ml⁻¹ ciliary neurotrophic factor (PeproTech, 450-13) and 1 ng ml⁻¹ NT3 (PeproTech, 450- 03) was used. OPCs were incubated in this proliferative medium for 3 days to allow for proliferation. After the cells were incubated in OPC proliferative medium for 3 days, they were switched to differentiation medium. This consists of OPC proliferation medium without the growth factors PDGF-AA and NT3. Half medium change was done every other day, and the differentiation assay continued for 6 days after the start of incubation with the differentiation medium. On the sixth day, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and incubated in HBSS until immunohistochemistry. All in vitro experiments were performed in triple wells (technical replicate) and independently replicated (biological replicates).

Western blot

Snap-frozen whole mouse brains or iOPC pellets were lysed in 200 μl RIPA buffer (Fisher) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Cell Signaling Technology). Thirty micrograms of total protein of each sample was analyzed by western blot using antibodies, including rabbit anti-phospho-AKT^T308 (Abcam ab38449, 1:500), rabbit anti-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, 9272S, 1:1,000) and mouse anti-α–tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, 3873S, 1:5,000). The membranes were imaged using a Li-Cor Odyssey Fc system and protein band intensities were analyzed using Li-Cor Image Studio Software (version 2.0). Relative expression of phospho-AKT^T308 was calculated after normalization to total AKT levels and using α-tubulin as a loading control. A minimum of four independent brain samples or independently generated iOPC pellets were used for each genotype.

Stereology

White matter volume was measured with the Cavalieri method by marking grid points over an area of interest and calculating with the Cavalieri Estimator in Stereo Investigator (v2023.1.2), as described previously⁵⁸.

Demyelination with lysolecithin

As the positive control for the cleaved caspase-3 immunostaining, 1 µl of lysolecithin (Sigma, 62963) was sterotaxically injected into cingulum (AP, +1 mm; ML, −1 mm; DV, −1.3 mm) of 4-week-old WT mice using Hamilton Neuros syringe (1701RN-65460-05) over 5 min with 0.2 µl min⁻¹ flow rate. Animals were transcardially perfused 1 week later.

CatWalk gait analysis

Mice (15 weeks of age) were tested on the CatWalk system (Noldus) before the complex wheel test. The test was performed as previously described⁴ in the dark with at least three successful runs recorded for each mouse. Data were analyzed with CatWalk XT 9.0 (Noldus).

RAS activity assay

RAS activity assays (Cell Biolabs, STA-440) were performed on fresh flash-frozen hippocampi homogenized in the provided lysis buffer supplemented with aprotinin, leupeptin and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. A total of 0.4–1 mg ml⁻¹ of lysate was assayed per well, and the RAS activation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each assay was performed using a minimum of three independently generated biological replicates. Data from these colorimetric assays were collected on a Bio-Rad iMark microplate reader and analyzed using MPM6 v6.3 (Bio-Rad Laboratories) software. In Extended Data Fig. 7a, one outlier was excluded from the Kras^+/⁻ group (1.097) and one from the Kras^+/−;Nf1^+/neo group (0.977) using the Grubbs test (α = 0.05).

Spatial transcriptomics

For tissue optimization, ten serial sections of 10-μm thickness from a representative sample were subjected to bulk RNA extraction (Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen) and RNA integrity number analysis (Bioanalyzer, Agilent). Seven serial sections of 10-µm thickness were collected on a Tissue Optimization slide (10x Genomics), hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained and subjected to permeabilization over a range of time points (3–30 min), followed by on-slide reverse transcription and fluorescent complementary DNA synthesis. Fluorescent cDNA footprint was imaged (Keyence BZ-X800, Keyence) and analyzed to obtain the appropriate permeabilization time for gene expression studies.

To analyze gene expression, 10-µm sections from fresh frozen OCT-embedded mouse brain tissue samples were collected on Visium Gene Expression Slides (10x Genomics). Sections were H&E stained and imaged (Keyence BZ-X800). Sections were permeabilized for 10 min, followed by reverse transcription, cDNA synthesis, cDNA amplification and next-generation sequencing library preparation as per the manufacturer’s protocol (10x Genomics).

For sequencing, indexed libraries were pooled and sequenced over NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) to obtain a minimum of 50,000 reads per spot (250M reads per section). Raw sequencing reads were parsed through the Spaceranger analysis pipeline (10x Genomics) to generate the final readout. The analyses were performed using Loupe Browser (6.0.0).

Statistics and reproducibility

Data analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad (v8.4.1). The normality of each group was determined by Shapiro–Wilk test. We did not assume equal variances. Comparisons between two normally distributed groups were analyzed using unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction. Multiple comparisons among normally distributed groups were analyzed using Brown–Forsythe and Welch analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with Dunnett’s T3 correction for multiple comparison. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparison was used for comparisons involving data that do not pass the Shapiro–Wilk test. Statistical tests used were indicated in the figure legends with F and P values. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. All data are presented as mean values with standard error of mean (s.e.m.). The number of biological samples used in the in vivo experiments is indicated in the figure legends. Animals in each litter were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Data from multiple litters, each containing various genotypes, were pooled for analyses. Mouse ear tag and cage identifiers, with no additional information, were available to investigators who performed data collection and analyses. All in vitro tests were repeated at least three independent times with similar results. In motor learning tests, sample sizes were chosen on the basis of power calculations of pilot cohorts (80% power and significance level of 0.05). Sample sizes for other experiments were based on and similar to previously published studies^4,5,6,7,8,9. Statistically significant outliers (based on Grubbs’ test) were excluded and indicated in figure legends.

Materials availability

The reagents described herein are freely available and can be obtained by contacting the corresponding authors and with a standard materials transfer agreement.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Spatial transcriptomics data are deposited in GEO (accession number GSE263303). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The Matlab code for complex wheel test analyses is available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10864194)⁵⁹.

References

Young, K. M. et al. Oligodendrocyte dynamics in the healthy adult CNS: evidence for myelin remodeling. Neuron 77, 873–885 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hughes, E. G., Orthmann-Murphy, J. L., Langseth, A. J. & Bergles, D. E. Myelin remodeling through experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in the adult somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 696–706 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hill, R. A., Li, A. M. & Grutzendler, J. Lifelong cortical myelin plasticity and age-related degeneration in the live mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 683–695 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gibson, E. M. et al. Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination in the mammalian brain. Science 344, 1252304 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mitew, S. et al. Pharmacogenetic stimulation of neuronal activity increases myelination in an axon-specific manner. Nat. Commun. 9, 306 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Geraghty, A. C. et al. Loss of adaptive myelination contributes to methotrexate chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Neuron 103, 250–265.e8 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McKenzie, I. A. et al. Motor skill learning requires active central myelination. Science 346, 318–322 (2014).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xiao, L. et al. Rapid production of new oligodendrocytes is required in the earliest stages of motor-skill learning. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1210–1217 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Steadman, P. E. et al. Disruption of oligodendrogenesis impairs memory consolidation in adult mice. Neuron 105, 150–164.e6 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knowles, J. K. et al. Maladaptive myelination promotes generalized epilepsy progression. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 596–606 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Monje, M. et al. Hedgehog-responsive candidate cell of origin for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4453–4458 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alcantara Llaguno, S. R. et al. Adult lineage-restricted CNS progenitors specify distinct glioblastoma subtypes. Cancer Cell 28, 429–440 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Solga, A. C. et al. The cell of origin dictates the temporal course of neurofibromatosis-1 (Nf1) low-grade glioma formation. Oncotarget 8, 47206–47215 (2017).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, C. et al. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals tumor cell of origin in glioma. Cell 146, 209–221 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gutmann, D. H. et al. Somatic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) inactivation characterizes NF1-associated pilocytic astrocytoma. Genome Res. 23, 431–439 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher, M. J. et al. Integrated molecular and clinical analysis of low-grade gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Acta Neuropathol. 141, 605–617 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vogel, A. C., Gutmann, D. H. & Morris, S. M. Neurodevelopmental disorders in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 59, 1112–1116 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Krab, L. C. et al. Motor learning in children with neurofibromatosis type I. Cerebellum 10, 14–21 (2011).
PubMed Google Scholar
Krab, L. C. et al. Impact of neurofibromatosis type 1 on school performance. J. Child Neurol. 23, 1002–1010 (2008).
PubMed Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., Rizvi, T. A., Karyala, S., McKinnon, R. D. & Ratner, N. Aberrant growth and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors in neurofibromatosis type 1 mutants. J. Neurosci. 23, 7207–7217 (2003).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, J. S. et al. Oligodendrocyte progenitor cell numbers and migration are regulated by the zebrafish orthologs of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 4643–4653 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gonzalez, P. P. et al. p53 and NF 1 loss plays distinct but complementary roles in glioma initiation and progression. Glia 66, 999–1015 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G. & Deisseroth, K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hughes, E. G., Kang, S. H., Fukaya, M. & Bergles, D. E. Oligodendrocyte progenitors balance growth with self-repulsion to achieve homeostasis in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 668–676 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klose, A. et al. Selective disactivation of neurofibromin GAP activity in neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1261–1268 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Anastasaki, C. et al. Human iPSC-derived neurons and cerebral organoids establish differential effects of germline NF1 gene mutations. Stem Cell Rep. 14, 541–550 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Li, K. et al. Mice with missense and nonsense NF1 mutations display divergent phenotypes compared with human neurofibromatosis type I. Dis. Model. Mech. 9, 759–767 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaul, A., Toonen, J. A., Cimino, P. J., Gianino, S. M. & Gutmann, D. H. Akt- or MEK-mediated mTOR inhibition suppresses Nf1 optic glioma growth. Neuro Oncol. 17, 843–853 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johannessen, C. M. et al. The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8573–8578 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, D. Y., Yeh, T. H., Emnett, R. J., White, C. R. & Gutmann, D. H. Neurofibromatosis-1 regulates neuroglial progenitor proliferation and glial differentiation in a brain region-specific manner. Genes Dev. 24, 2317–2329 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alshehri, B., Pagnin, M., Lee, J. Y., Petratos, S. & Richardson, S. J. The role of transthyretin in oligodendrocyte development. Sci. Rep. 10, 4189 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kujuro, Y., Suzuki, N. & Kondo, T. Esophageal cancer-related gene 4 is a secreted inducer of cell senescence expressed by aged CNS precursor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8259–8264 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuelling, L. W., Waggener, C. T., Afshari, F. S., Lister, J. A. & Fuss, B. Autotaxin/ENPP2 regulates oligodendrocyte differentiation in vivo in the developing zebrafish hindbrain. Glia 60, 1605–1618 (2012).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tam, L. T. et al. Effects of age on white matter microstructure in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J. Child Neurol. 36, 894–900 (2021).
PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., Petrucco, L., Hoodless, L. J., Portugues, R. & Czopka, T. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells sculpt the visual system by regulating axonal remodeling. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 280–284 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Auguste, Y. S. S. et al. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells engulf synapses during circuit remodeling in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1273–1278 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. et al. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells ingest axons in the mouse neocortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202580119 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Battefeld, A., Klooster, J. & Kole, M. H. P. Myelinating satellite oligodendrocytes are integrated in a glial syncytium constraining neuronal high-frequency activity. Nat. Commun. 7, 11298 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kirby, L. et al. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells present antigen and are cytotoxic targets in inflammatory demyelination. Nat. Commun. 10, 3887 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Swire, M. et al. Oligodendrocyte HCN2 channels regulate myelin sheath length. J. Neurosci. 41, 7954–7964 (2021).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang, S. M., Michel, K., Jokhi, V., Nedivi, E. & Arlotta, P. Neuron class-specific responses govern adaptive myelin remodeling in the neocortex. Science 370, eabd2109 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cui, Y. et al. Neurofibromin regulation of ERK signaling modulates GABA release and learning. Cell 135, 549–560 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Clemastine enhances myelination in the prefrontal cortex and rescues behavioral changes in socially isolated mice. J. Neurosci. 36, 957–962 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. ERK inhibition rescues defects in fate specification of Nf1-deficient neural progenitors and brain abnormalities. Cell 150, 816–830 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baudou, E. et al. Can the cognitive phenotype in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) be explained by neuroimaging? A review. Front. Neurol. 10, 1373 (2019).
PubMed Google Scholar
DiPaolo, D. P. et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1: pathologic substrate of high-signal-intensity foci in the brain. Radiology 195, 721–724 (1995).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guo, X., Pan, Y. & Gutmann, D. H. Genetic and genomic alterations differentially dictate low-grade glioma growth through cancer stem cell-specific chemokine recruitment of T cells and microglia. Neuro Oncol. 21, 1250–1262 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gutmann, D. H. et al. Gliomas presenting after age 10 in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Neurology 59, 759–761 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S. A., Yang, Q. & Friedman, J. M. Mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: an analysis using U.S. death certificates. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 1110–1118 (2001).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brannan, C. I. et al. Targeted disruption of the neurofibromatosis type-1 gene leads to developmental abnormalities in heart and various neural crest-derived tissues. Genes Dev. 8, 1019–1029 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bajenaru, M. L. et al. Optic nerve glioma in mice requires astrocyte Nf1 gene inactivation and Nf1 brain heterozygosity. Cancer Res. 63, 8573–8577 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Ablation of NF1 function in neurons induces abnormal development of cerebral cortex and reactive gliosis in the brain. Genes Dev. 15, 859–876 (2001).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bajenaru, M. L. et al. Astrocyte-specific inactivation of the neurofibromatosis 1 gene (NF1) is insufficient for astrocytoma formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5100–5113 (2002).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anastasaki, C. et al. Neuronal hyperexcitability drives central and peripheral nervous system tumor progression in models of neurofibromatosis-1. Nat. Commun. 13, 2785 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Toonen, J. A. et al. NF1 germline mutation differentially dictates optic glioma formation and growth in neurofibromatosis-1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 1703–1713 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sage, J., Miller, A. L., Perez-Mancera, P. A., Wysocki, J. M. & Jacks, T. Acute mutation of retinoblastoma gene function is sufficient for cell cycle re-entry. Nature 424, 223–228 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Anastasaki, C. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell engineering establishes a humanized mouse platform for pediatric low-grade glioma modeling. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 120 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
West, M. J. Estimating volume in biological structures. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012, 1129–1139 (2012).
PubMed Google Scholar
Mount, C. Complex wheel code. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10864194 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS092597 to M.M.; R35NS07211-01 to D.H.G.), NCI (R01CA258384 to M.M. and D.H.G.), NIH Director’s Pioneer Award (DP1NS111132 to M.M.), Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1-0131 to M.M. and D.H.G.; HT9425-23-1-0270 to D.H.G. and Y.P.; W81XWH-19-1-0260 and HT9425-23-1-0239 to Y.P.), Gilbert Family Foundation (to D.H.G. and Y.P.), Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation (to M.M. and Y.P.), McKenna Claire Foundation (to M.M.), Gatsby Charitable Foundation (Gatsby Initiative in Brain Development and Psychiatry, to M.M.), Oscar’s Kids Foundation (to M.M.), Cancer Research UK and Cancer Grand Challenges (OT2CA278688, CGCATF-2021/100012), Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research (to M.M.), Waxman Family Research Fund (to M.M.), Chadtough Defeat DIPG (to M.M.), Stanford Bio-X Institute (to J.D.H. and P.R.), Will Irwin Research Fund of the Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation (to M.M.), Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (19-16681 to Y.P.), Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR210085 to Y.P. as the CPRIT scholar in Cancer Research), NIH (S10OD025212 and 1S10OD021763) to the Stanford Genomics Core and National Cancer Institute R50 Research Specialist Award (1-R50-CA233164-01 to C.A.). We thank J. Sage for providing the Rb1^+/fl mice.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Yuan Pan, Jared D. Hysinger, Belgin Yalçın, James J. Lennon.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Yuan Pan, Jared D. Hysinger, Belgin Yalçın, James J. Lennon, Youkyeong Gloria Byun, Preethi Raghavan, Nicole F. Schindler, Lijun Ni, Haojun Xu, Karen Malacon, Samin M. Jahan, Alexis E. Ivec, Christopher W. Mount, Surya Nagaraja & Michelle Monje
Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Yuan Pan & Benjamin E. Aghoghovwia
Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Yuan Pan
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Youkyeong Gloria Byun & Michelle Monje
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Corina Anastasaki, Jit Chatterjee, Suzanne Scheaffer & David H. Gutmann
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Laura D. Attardi
Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Laura D. Attardi

Authors

Yuan Pan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jared D. Hysinger
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Belgin Yalçın
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
James J. Lennon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Youkyeong Gloria Byun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Preethi Raghavan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nicole F. Schindler
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corina Anastasaki
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jit Chatterjee
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lijun Ni
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Haojun Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Karen Malacon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Samin M. Jahan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexis E. Ivec
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Benjamin E. Aghoghovwia
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christopher W. Mount
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Surya Nagaraja
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Suzanne Scheaffer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Laura D. Attardi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David H. Gutmann
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michelle Monje
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M., D.H.G. and Y.P. conceived of the project. Y.P., J.D.H., B.Y., J.J.L., Y.G.B., P.R., N.F.S., C.A., J.C., L.N., H.X., K.M., S.M.J., A.E.I., B.E.A., C.W.M., S.N. and S.S. conducted experiments. Y.P., D.H.G. and M.M. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Y.P., J.D.H., B.Y. and J.J.L. performed data analyses. L.D.A. provided Kras-mutant mice and suggestions on the experiments. All authors contributed to manuscript editing. Y.P., D.H.G. and M.M. jointly supervised this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Pan, David H. Gutmann or Michelle Monje.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.M. or her family holds equity in MapLight Therapeutics and CARGO Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks Vittorio Gallo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Optogenetic experiment controls.

(a) Immunohistochemistry revealed no change in the density of new oligodendrocytes (EdU⁺/ASPA⁺) between the ipsilateral (blue, ipsi) and the contralateral (white, contra) side, during the 3-hour of the optogenetics experiment. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction; N = 4 in each group. (b-d) Immunohistochemistry of the cingulum revealed no change in the density of microglia (Iba1⁺ cells) or reactive microglia (CD68⁺/Iba1⁺ cells) between the ipsilateral (blue, ipsi) and the contralateral (white, contra) side of Nf1^WT (WT, N = 4), Nf1^OPC-iHet (Nf1^+/-, N = 4) and Nf1^OPC-iKO (Nf1^-/-, N = 3) mice. Paired t test. (e) Cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) immunohistochemistry in the positive control (cuprizone-induced demyelination) showed staining of CC3⁺ (green) cells. Scale bar, 100 µm. (f) Immunohistochemistry of the cingulum from Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice exposed to optogenetic stimulation revealed few CC3⁺ cells. Scale bar, 100 µm. (g) Nf1^WT mice infected with AAV carrying eYFP did not show changes in the density of new OPCs (EdU⁺/PDGFRα⁺) on the ipsilateral (blue, ipsi) side, relative to the contralateral (white, contra) side, of the brain. Mann-Whitney test; N = 3 in each group. (h) The density of total OPCs (PDGFRα⁺) in the contralateral side of optogenetically manipulated Nf1^OPC-iKO (N = 5), but not Nf1^OPC-iHet (N = 4), mice is increased relative to the Nf1^WT (N = 7) controls. Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 34.93) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons. ***, P = 0.0009. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (a,b,c,d,g,h); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 OPC-specific Nf1 biallelic inactivation leads to global OPC hyperdensity, whereas Nf1 monoallelic inactivation leads to focal OPC hyperdensities.

(a, b) Nf1 monoallelic and biallelic inactivation was induced at 3 weeks of age and mouse brains analyzed 4 weeks later by immunofluorescence (IF). Immunohistochemistry revealed increased OPC (PDGFRα⁺ cells) density in the brains of Nf1^OPC-iKO (N = 3), but not Nf1^OPC-iHet (N = 3 [corpus callosum], 4 [cortex]), mice relative to the Nf1^WT controls (N = 3). Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 55.06 [corpus callosum], 250.9 [cortex]) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons; *, P = 0.0299; **, P = 0.0056; Scale bars, 1 mm (top), 250 µm (bottom). (c) Immunohistochemistry of the cingulum from Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice exposed to complex wheel testing revealed few CC3⁺ cells. Scale bar, 100 µm. (d-e) Nf1 monoallelic and biallelic inactivation was induced at 3 weeks of age, and brains analyzed 16 weeks later. PDGFRα immunohistochemistry (green) revealed globally increased OPC density in the brains of Nf1^OPC-iKO mice, and focal OPC hyperdensities (dash lines) in Nf1^OPC-iHet mice. N = 3 in each group; Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 13.82) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons; *, P = 0.0115; Scale bar, 1 mm. (f) Sagittal sections of Nf1^+/- mouse brains were immunolabeled with PDGFRα (green) and MBP (red) antibodies. Scale bar, 1 mm. Dashed shapes indicate the focal OPC hyperdensities. (g) The number of focal OPC hyperdensities detected in each brain section from 16-week old Nf1^+/- mice. N = 3 per group. Welch’s t test; *, P = 0.0471. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (b,e,g); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 The focal OPC hyperdensities in the Nf1^+/- mouse brain lack obvious changes in other glial cells, senescence, or apoptosis.

(a, b) Immunohistochemistry of Nf1^+/- mouse brains revealed no changes in the density of microglia (Iba1⁺ cells) or reactive microglia (CD68⁺/Iba1⁺ cells) in regions with focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) relative to those without (non-HD). Wilcoxon test (grey matter Iba1⁺ cells); Paired t test (other comparisons); Scale bars, 50 µm. N = 4 per group. (c) RNAscope revealed no changes in reactive astrocytes (Cxcl10⁺/Sox9⁺ cells) in areas with focal OPC hyperdensities relative to those without. N = 5 per group. Paired t test; Scale bar, 50 µm. (d) Immunohistochemistry revealed no senescent (p21⁺) or apoptotic (TUNEL⁺) cells in areas with OPC hyperdensities (HD), relative to those without (non-HD). Scale bar, 20 µm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (b,c); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 OPCs in small focal OPC hyperdensities show a temporary increase in proliferation.

(a) Immunohistochemistry revealed that small and large focal OPC hyperdensities, with proliferating OPCs (Ki67⁺/PDGFRα⁺), are present at the same time in the brain of Nf1^+/- mice. Scale bars, 1 mm (whole brain), 100 µm (insets). (b) Overall, the percent of proliferating OPCs (the number of Ki67⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells divided by the number of total PDGFRα⁺ cells) does not change between non-focal OPC hyperdensity- (non-HD, N = 6) and focal OPC hyperdensity-containing (HD, N = 6) areas of 5 week old Nf1^+/- mice, and is similar to the percent in WT mice (N = 6). Kruskal-Wallis test. (c) The focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) in Nf1^+/- mouse brains are divided into small and large size groups, using 1.5 × 10⁷ µm³ as an arbitrary cut-off. (d) Separating data in (b) based on the cut-off in (c) revealed that increased percent of proliferation was only observed in small (S) HD areas in 5-week-old Nf1^+/- mouse brains (N = 6 in each group), but not in small HD areas of 24-week-old Nf1^+/- mice (N = 4 in each group), or large (L) HD areas. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons (5w); Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (24w, F = 4.85) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons; *, P = 0.0224. (e) Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-Het mice were pulsed with EdU (40 mg/kg, i.p.) at P30-31. Immunohistochemistry performed at P37 revealed that focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) in the Nf1^OPC-Het mice exhibited reduced percentage of new OLs (the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺/PDGFRα^- cells divided by the number of EdU⁺ cells) relative to non-HD regions. N = 4 per group. Brown-Forsythe ANOVA (Dunnett); *, P = 0.0444. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (b,d,e); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Focal OPC hyperdensities are not detected in mice harboring monoallelic inactivation of other tumor suppressor genes.

(a) Immunohistochemistry revealed no focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) in Trp53^+/- or Pten^+/- mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. (b) No focal OPC hyperdensities were observed in Rb1^OPC-iHet (Rb1^+/fl;Pdgfra::Cre^ER injected with tamoxifen) mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. (c) OPC density in Trp53^+/-, Pten^+/-, and Rb1^OPC-iHet mice is similar to WT mice. Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 91.3) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons. **, P = 0.0076. N = 4,4,4,4,4,3 (left to right). Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (c); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 KRAS activity is not required for the development of focal OPC hyperdensities in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice.

(a) Heterozygous Kras loss rescues RAS hyperactivation in heterozygous Nf1-mutant mice. Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 1582) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons. **, P = 0.0012 (WT vs Nf1^+/neo mice), 0.001 (Nf1^+/neo vs Kras^+/- mice), 0.0018 (Nf1^+/neo vs Kras^+/-;Nf1^+/neo mice). N = 3 per group. (b) Kras heterozygous loss rescues RAS hyperactivation in mice heterozygous for the R1809C Nf1 gene mutation (1809; 5425 C > T)³⁵. Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test (F = 610) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons. ***, P = 0.0003; ****, P < 0.0001. (c) The percentage of the forebrain covered by focal OPC hyperdensities revealed no difference between Nf1^+/neo and Kras^+/-; Nf1^+/neo mice. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. **, P = 0.0071. N = 4,4,6 (left to right). Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (a-c); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Spatial transcriptomic analysis of focal OPC hyperdensities.

(a) Immunohistochemistry revealed an increased percent of new OPCs (left, the number of EdU⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells divided by the number of EdU⁺ cells) and decreased percent of new OLs (right, the number of EdU⁺/ASPA⁺ cells divided by the number of EdU⁺ cells) in the HD areas of Nf1^OPC-Het mice (yellow, N = 5), relative to the non-HD areas of Nf1^OPC-Het mice (blue, N = 4) and Nf1^WT (white, N = 4) mice. *, P = 0.0255 (new OPC), 0.0272 (new OL). Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons (F = 5.812 [new OPC], 7.001[new OL]). (b) Representative image of a 24w-old Nf1^+/- mouse brain used for spatial transcriptomics. Left, PDGFRα (green) immunohistochemistry revealed focal OPC hyperdensities within the corpus callosum (blue, inset; orange represents non-hyperdensity area). Right, areas with focal OPC hyperdensities (blue) and those without (orange) are marked in the Loupe Browser for regional differential gene expression analyses. Scale bar, 1 mm. (c) Regional differential gene expression analyses of brains from four 24w-old Nf1^+/- mice revealed four genes increased in the focal OPC hyperdensities relative to the areas lacking hyperdensities in the corpus callosum. The p-value was adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple tests in the Loupe Browser 6.0.0. (d) Immunofluorescence of Nf1^+/- brains revealed increased ECRG4 and ENPP2 expression within corpus callosum focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) relative to areas lacking hyperdensities (non-HD). The area of ECRG4/ENPP2 signal (green) positively correlates with the area of PDGFRα signal (red, linear regression). To measure ECRG4, ENPP2 and PDGFRα area, the threshold was adjusted to cover the fluorescence signal. The same threshold value was used for all images. Four images were collected for each animal, representing focal OPC hyperdensities and areas lacking hyperdensities. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. * P = 0.0334; ** P = 0.0086. N = 4 per group. Scale bar, 50 µm. (e) RNAscope of Nf1^+/- brains revealed increased Ttr expression within the focal OPC hyperdensities (HD) relative to areas lacking hyperdensities (non-HD). N = 6 per group. Both cortex and corpus callosum hyperdensities were included in the quantification. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. * P = 0.0262. Scale bar, 25 µm. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (d,e); two-sided. ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Nf1-mutant mice develop normal baseline oligodendrocyte density and myelination by young adulthood.

(a) Immunohistochemistry performed in the cingulum of 1-month-old Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (tamoxifen injected at P28) revealed that Nf1^OPC-iKO mice had an increased percentage of new OPCs (the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells divided by the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺ cells) and reduced percentage of new OLs (the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺/PDGFRα^- cells divided by the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺ cells) relative to Nf1^WT mice. N = 4 per group. ***, P = 0.0005. Welch’s test. (b) Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice received tamoxifen at 13 weeks of age and pulsed with EdU in the drinking water for one week starting at 15 weeks of age. Immunohistochemistry performed at 16 weeks of age revealed that Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (N = 3) had an increased percentage of new OPCs (the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺/PDGFRα⁺ cells divided by the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺ cells) and reduced percentage of new OLs (the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺/PDGFRα^- cells divided by the number of EdU⁺/Olig2⁺ cells) relative to Nf1^WT mice (N = 6). Mann-Whitney test; *, P = 0.0238. (c) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of myelin structure in the cingulum of 4-month-old Nf1^WT and Nf1^OPC-iKO mice revealed similar g-ratios (N = 4 per group) and densities of myelinated axons (N = 4 per group). Welch’s test. (d) Stereological analysis revealed similar cingulum volume between 4-month-old Nf1^WT (N = 5) and Nf1^OPC-iKO (N = 3) mice. Welch’s test. (e) TEM revealed similar g-ratios and density of myelinated axons in the corpus callosum of 4-month-old Nf1^WT (N = 5) and Nf1^OPC-iKO (N = 4) mice. Welch’s test. (f) TEM revealed similar g-ratios in the corpus callosum of 3-month-old WT and Nf1^+/- mice. N = 4 per group. Welch’s test. (g) Immunohistochemistry revealed a similar density of oligodendrocytes (ASPA⁺ cells) in the cingulum and corpus callosum of 6-month-old WT (N = 3) and Nf1^+/- (N = 4) mice. Welch’s test (cingulum). Mann-Whitney test (corpus callosum). (h) Stereological analysis revealed similar corpus callosum volume between WT and Nf1^+/- mice at 1-month and 3-month of age. N = 5 per group. Welch’s test. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (a-h); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05). Scale bars, 2 µm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Gait analyses of Nf1-mutant mice.

(a) CatWalk test revealed that 14–15 week old Nf1^OPC-Het (Nf1^+/fl; Pdgfra::Cre) mice (N = 8) exhibit similar swing speeds, stride lengths, and paw intensities as Nf1^WT mice (N = 3). Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction (swing speed and stride length); Mann-Whitney test (paw intensity). (b) Nf1^+/- mice (N = 7, 14–15 week old) show reduced swing speed, but not stride length or paw intensity, relative to WT mice (N = 4). Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction; *, P = 0.0159. (c) Nf1^OPC-iKO mice (N = 9, 14–15 week old) show similar swing speed, stride length, and paw intensity as Nf1^WT mice (N = 7). Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. Data shown as mean ± SEM; each point = one mouse (a,b,c); two-sided; ns, not significant (P > 0.05).

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Mice with neuronal ChR2 expression in the motor planning region were exposed to blue light (related to Fig. 1) and showed complex motor behavior.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–5

Raw data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Tables 1–9

Raw data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Hysinger, J.D., Yalçın, B. et al. Nf1 mutation disrupts activity-dependent oligodendroglial plasticity and motor learning in mice. Nat Neurosci 27, 1555–1564 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01654-y

Download citation

Received: 22 September 2022
Accepted: 18 April 2024
Published: 30 May 2024
Issue Date: August 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01654-y

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Main

Impaired Nf1-mutant OPC responses to neuronal activity

Deficiency in experience-regulated oligodendrogenesis

Nf1 loss generates OPC hyperdensities via PI3K/AKT activity

Impaired adaptive oligodendrogenesis in OPC hyperdensities

Nf1-mutant mice exhibit delayed oligodendroglial development

Nf1 loss in OPCs results in motor skill learning deficits

Discussion

Conclusion

Methods

Mice

Optogenetic stimulation

Immunohistochemistry

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

Complex wheel test

Transmission electron microscopy

Human iPS cell-induced OPCs

Mouse OPC culture and differentiation assay

Western blot

Stereology

Demyelination with lysolecithin

CatWalk gait analysis

RAS activity assay

Spatial transcriptomics

Statistics and reproducibility

Materials availability

Reporting summary

Data availability

Code availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Additional information

Extended data

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Search

Quick links