Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Exergame and cognitive training for preventing falls in community-dwelling older people: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Exergame training, in which video games are used to promote exercise, can be tailored to address cognitive and physical risk factors for falls and is a promising method for fall prevention in older people. Here, we performed a randomized clinical trial using the smart±step gaming system to examine the effectiveness of two home-based computer game interventions, seated cognitive training and step exergame training, for fall prevention in community-dwelling older people, as compared with a minimal-intervention control group. Participants aged 65 years or older (n = 769, 71% female) living independently in the community were randomized to one of three arms: (1) cognitive training using a computerized touchpad while seated, (2) exergame step training on a computerized mat or (3) control (provided with an education booklet on healthy ageing and fall prevention). The rate of falls reported monthly over 12 months—the primary outcome of the trial—was significantly reduced in the exergame training group compared with the control group (incidence rate ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.56–0.98), but was not statistically different between the cognitive training and control groups (incidence rate ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.65–1.12). No beneficial effects of the interventions were found for secondary outcomes of physical and cognitive function, and no serious intervention-related adverse events were reported. The results of this trial support the use of exergame step training for preventing falls in community-dwelling older people. As this intervention can be conducted at home and requires only minimal equipment, it has the potential for scalability as a public health intervention to address the increasing problem of falls and fall-related injuries. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ACTRN12616001325493.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The smart±step gaming system.
Fig. 2: Trial profile.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of confidentiality. Upon reasonable request, individual deidentified participant data (including data dictionaries) will be made available via a RedCap web-based database, after review and approval of a methodologically sound proposal, with a signed data access agreement, in line with Ethics Committee requirements. Please contact corresponding author, D.L.S. (d.sturnieks@neura.edu.au). These files will be available from the date of publication until the date stated in the approved request. The study protocol is available as an open access publication34 and the statistical analysis plan is available on OpenScience Framework (https://osf.io/uqk5s/).

References

  1. James, S. L. et al. The global burden of falls: global, regional and national estimates of morbidity and mortality from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Inj. Prev. 26, i3–i11 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Florence, C. S. et al. Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 66, 693–698 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopewell, S. et al. Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7, CD012221 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherrington, C. et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, Cd012424 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Osho, O., Owoeye, O. & Armijo-Olivo, S. Adherence and attrition in fall prevention exercise programs for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Aging Phys. Act. 26, 304–326 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muir, S. W., Gopaul, K. & Montero Odasso, M. M. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 41, 299–308 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith-Ray, R. L. et al. Impact of cognitive training on balance and gait in older adults. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 70, 357–366 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verghese, J., Mahoney, J., Ambrose, A. F., Wang, C. & Holtzer, R. Effect of cognitive remediation on gait in sedentary seniors. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 65, 1338–1343 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, N. T. et al. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 329–340 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnechère, B., Klass, M., Langley, C. & Sahakian, B. J. Brain training using cognitive apps can improve cognitive performance and processing speed in older adults. Sci. Rep. 11, 12313 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Valenzuela, T., Razee, H., Schoene, D., Lord, S. R. & Delbaere, K. An interactive home-based cognitive-motor step training program to reduce fall risk in older adults: qualitative descriptive study of older adults’ experiences and requirements. JMIR Aging 1, e11975 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pichierri, G., Wolf, P., Murer, K. & de Bruin, E. D. Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 11, 29 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoene, D., Valenzuela, T., Lord, S. R. & de Bruin, E. D. The effect of interactive cognitive-motor training in reducing fall risk in older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 14, 107 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hai, L., Hou, H.-Y., Zhou, C. & Li, H.-J. The effect of exergame training on physical functioning of healthy older adults: a meta-analysis. Games Health J. 11, 207–224 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang, Q. et al. Effects of exergaming on balance of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Games Health J. 9, 11–23 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoene, D. et al. A randomized controlled pilot study of home-based step training in older people using videogame technology. PLoS One 8, e57734 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoene, D. et al. Interactive cognitive-motor step training improves cognitive risk factors of falling in older adults - a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10, e0145161 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, Z., Bao, D. & Zhou, J. Comparison between the effects of exergame intervention and traditional physical training on improving balance and fall prevention in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 18, 164 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherrington, C. et al. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 51, 1750–1758 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirelman, A. et al. Addition of a non-immersive virtual reality component to treadmill training to reduce fall risk in older adults (V-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388, 1170–1182 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamada, M. et al. Multitarget stepping program in combination with a standardized multicomponent exercise program can prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized, controlled trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 61, 1669–1675 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klenk, J. et al. Conceptualizing a dynamic fall risk model including intrinsic risks and exposures. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 18, 921–927 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cumming, R. G., Salkeld, G., Thomas, M. & Szonyi, G. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 55, M299–M305 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Skjaeret, N. et al. Exercise and rehabilitation delivered through exergames in older adults: an integrative review of technologies, safety and efficacy. Int. J. Med. Inform. 85, 1–16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lord, S. R., Ward, J. A., Williams, P. & Anstey, K. J. Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 42, 1110–1117 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Callisaya, M. L. et al. Gait, gait variability and the risk of multiple incident falls in older people: a population-based study. Age Ageing 40, 481–487 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor, M. E., Delbaere, K., Lord, S. R., Mikolaizak, A. S. & Close, J. C. Physical impairments in cognitively impaired older people: implications for risk of falls. Int. Psychogeriatr. 25, 148–156 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bartosch, P. S., Kristensson, J., McGuigan, F. E. & Akesson, K. E. Frailty and prediction of recurrent falls over 10 years in a community cohort of 75-year-old women. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 32, 2241–2250 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyman, S. R. & Victor, C. R. Older people’s participation in and engagement with falls prevention interventions in community settings: an augment to the Cochrane systematic review. Age Ageing 41, 16–23 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoang, P., Schoene, D., Gandevia, S., Smith, S. & Lord, S. R. Effects of a home-based step training programme on balance, stepping, cognition and functional performance in people with multiple sclerosis—a randomized controlled trial. Mult. Scler. 22, 94–103 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Song, J. et al. Home-based step training using videogame technology in people with Parkinson’s disease: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 32, 299–311 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. The prevention of falls in later life. A report of the Kellogg International Work Group on the prevention of falls by the elderly. Dan. Med. Bull. 34, 1–24 (1987).

  33. Boot, W. R., Simons, D. J., Stothart, C. & Stutts, C. The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8, 445–454 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sturnieks, D. L. et al. Effect of cognitive-only and cognitive-motor training on preventing falls in community-dwelling older people: protocol for the smart±step randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 9, e029409 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pfeiffer, E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 23, 433–441 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richardson, J., Atherton Day, N., Peacock, S. & Iezzi, A. Measurement of the quality of life for economic evaluation and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark 2 instrument. Aust. Economic Rev. 37, 62–88 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lamb, S. E., Jorstad-Stein, E. C., Hauer, K. & Becker, C. Prevention of Falls Network Europe & Outcomes Consensus Group. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 1618–1622 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Merom, D. et al. Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire for seniors: validity and responsiveness. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46, 947–954 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lord, S. R., Menz, H. B. & Tiedemann, A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys. Ther. 83, 237–252 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Podsiadlo, D. & Richardson, S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 39, 142–148 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guralnik, J. M. et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. 49, M85–M94 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schoene, D., Delbaere, K. & Lord, S. R. Impaired response selection during stepping predicts falls in older people—a cohort study. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 18, 719–725 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Strauss E., Sherman O. & Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary 3rd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).

  44. Trenerry M. R., Crosson B., DeBoe J. & Leber W. Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test (Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989).

  45. Pollack, I., Johnson, L. B. & Knaff, P. R. Running memory span. J. Exp. Psychol. 57, 137–146 (1959).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R. & Hodges, J. R. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 21, 1078–1085 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Delbaere, K., Smith, S. T. & Lord, S. R. Development and initial validation of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66, 674–680 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. & Lowe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1092–1097 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern Med. 16, 606–613 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ustun, T. B. et al. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull. World Health Organ. 88, 815–823 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Jette, A. M. et al. Late life function and disability instrument: I. development and evaluation of the disability component. J. Gerontology: Ser. A. 57, M209–M16 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Glynn, R. J. & Buring, J. E. Ways of measuring rates of recurrent events. Br. Med. J. 312, 364–367 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. White, I. R., Horton, N. J., Carpenter, J. & Pocock, S. J. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. Br. Med. J. 342, d40 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Robertson, M. C., Campbell, A. J. & Herbison, P. Statistical analysis of efficacy in falls prevention trials. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 60, 530–534 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lamb, S. E. et al. Screening and intervention to prevent falls and fractures in older people. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1848–1859 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hill, A. M. et al. Fall rates in hospital rehabilitation units after individualised patient and staff education programmes: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385, 2592–2599 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the considerable time and energy contributed by the participants and project staff involved in this study. This work is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Project Grant (ID: 1086804) awarded to D.L.S., J.M. and K.D. and Program Grant (ID: 1055084) awarded to S.R.L. and R.D.H. M.J.V., K.D., C.S., R.D.H. and S.R.L. also received salary funding (fellowships) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. D.L.S. was supported by a Bushell Foundation Rising Star Fellowship. These funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, UNSW Sydney (HC15203) on 8 September 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L.S., S.R.L., K.D., J.M. and M.J.V. conceived and designed the trial. Additional advice about design and statistical analyses was given by C.S. and R.D.H. Funding was obtained by D.L.S., J.M., K.D. and M.J.V. with substantial input by S.R.L. J.G. led software development with input from D.L.S., S.R.L. and K.D. J.T., C.H., N.S., M.R., J.L. and C.C. established databases and study manuals, and contributed to recruitment, data collection and processing. C.H., S.R.L., D.L.S. and B.T. undertook the statistical analyses, and directly accessed and verified the underlying data reported in the manuscript. All authors contributed intellectual input into and approved the manuscript. The authors agree to be accountable for the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daina L. Sturnieks.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Joaquin Anguera, Kenneth Rockwood, Emma Stanmore and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Michael Basson, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Table 1 Planned analyses on the effects of exergame step and cognitive training on the rate of falls over 12 months, compared to control, for subgroups of: faller status; physical status; and cognitive status

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Statistical analysis plan and published protocol related to Extended Data Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sturnieks, D.L., Hicks, C., Smith, N. et al. Exergame and cognitive training for preventing falls in community-dwelling older people: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med 30, 98–105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02739-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02739-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing