Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Abstract

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has generated mixed results. TORCHLIGHT is a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) (n = 353; experimental arm) versus placebo and nab-P (n = 178; control arm) for the treatment of women with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent central review in the PD-L1-positive and intention-to-treat populations. The secondary end points included overall survival and safety. Overall, 200 and 100 patients, in the toripalimab and placebo arm respectively had PD-L1-positive TNBC. At the prespecified interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in PFS assessed by a blinded independent central review was demonstrated in the experimental arm in the PD-L1-positive population (median PFS 8.4 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.470–0.906, P = 0.0102). The median overall survival was 32.8 versus 19.5 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.414–0.914, P = 0.0148). Similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (99.2% versus 98.9%), grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (56.4% versus 54.3%) and fatal AEs (0.6% versus 3.4%) occurred in the experimental and control arms. The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1-positive patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC with an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT03777579.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CONSORT diagram of the TORCHLIGHT study.
Fig. 2: Progression-free survival in the PD-L1+ TNBC population.
Fig. 3: Overall survival in the PD-L1+ TNBC population.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Due to data privacy regulations, access to the raw clinical data is restricted. Requests for access to the patient-level data from this study can be submitted via email to jiangzefei@csco.org.cn with a detailed proposal for approval. In response to the inquiry, please be informed that the timeframe for responding to requests is approximately 2 weeks. A signed data access agreement with the sponsor is required before accessing the data. The trial protocol and statistical analysis plan is in the supplementary documents. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Waks, A. G. & Winer, E. P. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA 321, 288–300 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Meara, T. A. & Tolaney, S. M. Tumor mutational burden as a predictor of immunotherapy response in breast cancer. Oncotarget 12, 394–400 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman, A. M. et al. Tumor mutational burden as an independent predictor of response to immunotherapy in diverse cancers. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 2598–2608 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmid, P. et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miles, D. et al. Primary results from IMpassion131 a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 32, 994–1004 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortes, J. et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 217–226 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, B. et al. Safety, efficacy, and biomarker analysis of toripalimab in previously treated advanced melanoma: results of the POLARIS-01 multicenter phase II trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 4250–4259 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F. H. et al. Efficacy, safety, and correlative biomarkers of toripalimab in previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase II clinical trial (POLARIS-02). J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 704–712 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng, X. et al. Recombinant humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody toripalimab in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results of an open-label phase II clinical study Polaris-03. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 5040–5040 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei, X.L. et al. A phase I study of toripalimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with refractory malignant solid tumors. Cancer Commun. (2020).

  12. Mai, H.-Q. et al. Toripalimab or placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. 27, 1536–1543 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, H. et al. Glycosylation-independent binding of monoclonal antibody toripalimab to FG loop of PD-1 for tumor immune checkpoint therapy. MAbs 11, 681–690 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bian, L. et al. JS001, an anti-PD-1 mAb for advanced triple negative breast cancer patients after multi-line systemic therapy in a phase I trial. Ann. Transl. Med. 7, 435 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramos-Casals, M. et al. Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 6, 38 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, E. et al. FDA analysis of outcomes in Asian patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). J. Clin. Oncol. 37, e20690 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z. et al. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy for patients with treatment-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial (CHOICE-01). J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 651–663 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is sponsored by Shanghai Junshi Biosciences. The authors thank the patients who participated in this study and their families. Professional medical writing and editing support was provided by the Junshi clinical development team. This work was supported by National Major Science & Technology Major Projects (2017ZX09302009) and Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Technology Grant (17431900700). This work was presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting, 3 June 2023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design was the responsibility of Z.J. Provision of study materials or patients was the responsibility of Z.J., Q.O., T.S., Q.Z., Y.T., J.C., Haibo Wang, Y.Y., Xiaojia Wang, X.Z., Y.W., S.G., J.W., L.Z., J.Y., J.Q., M.Y., X.L., T.Y., Ying Cheng, M.L., Aimin Zang, S.W., C.W., Xinhong Wu, J.C., H.L., Y.L., C.G., K.G., C.X., H.X., Xiaohong Wu, J.Y., Qingshan Li, Yiding Chen, Z.C., Anqin Zhang, Y.Z., Y.W., J.N., Qiang Liu, K.W., X.M., L.C., Y.P., P.F., H.Z., D.P., Y.S., Y.H., H.W. and S.C. Data analysis and interpretation was conducted by Z.J., Q.O., T.S., Q.Z., X. Luo, W.Y., R.D. and P.K. Manuscript writing was carried out by all authors. Final approval of manuscript was the responsibility of all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zefei Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

X. Luo, W.Y., R.D. and C.Y. are employed by Shanghai Junshi Biosciences. P.K. is employed by TopAlliance Biosciences. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Hope Rugo, Yisheng Li, and Xichun Hu for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ulrike Harjes, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 BICR-Assessed PFS Per RECIST v1.1; PFS treatment effects in subgroups (ITT population).

Kaplan–Meier-estimated PFS curves as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 are shown to compare the toripalimab plus chemotherapy arm with the placebo plus chemotherapy arm as first-line treatment for patients with initially diagnosed metastatic or recurrent TNBC (Panel A). Censored patients are marked with “|” in the graph. Numbers of patients at risk at indicated time points shown below x-axis. Number of events, median PFS, 1-year and 2-year PFS rates and stratified hazard ratio for PFS are shown to the right of Kaplan–Meier curves. Progression-free survival in key subgroups is shown in Panel B. All hazard ratios were computed using the Cox proportional hazards model. All P values were two-sided with no adjustment of multiplicity. The P values of comparing the Kaplan–Meier curves were computed using the log-rank test stratified by the baseline PD-L1 expression status, history of paclitaxel treatment, and line of therapy at enrollment. The P values of testing the interaction of the subgroup variables with the treatment (Panel B) were computed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model with the treatment arm, the subgroup variable and their interaction as the covariates.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Overall Survival; OS treatment effects in subgroups (ITT Population).

Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS are shown to compare the toripalimab plus chemotherapy arm with the placebo plus chemotherapy arm as first-line treatment for patients with initially diagnosed metastatic or recurrent TNBC (Panel A). Censored patients are marked with “|” in the graph. Numbers of patients at risk at indicated time points are shown below the x-axis. Number of events, median OS, 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS rates, and stratified hazard ratio for death are shown to the right of Kaplan–Meier curves. Overall survival in key subgroups is shown in Panel B. All hazard ratios were computed using the Cox proportional hazards model. All P values were two-sided with no adjustment of multiplicity. The P values of comparing the Kaplan–Meier curves were computed using the log-rank test stratified by the baseline PD-L1 expression status, history of paclitaxel treatment, and line of therapy at enrollment. The P values of testing the interaction of the subgroup variables with the treatment.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Overall Survival (OS) in PD-L1 expression subpopulations.

Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS are shown to compare the toripalimab plus chemotherapy arm with the placebo plus chemotherapy arm as first-line treatment for patients with initially diagnosed metastatic or recurrent TNBC with PD-L1 expression JS311 CPS < 1 (Panel A), 1≤CPS<10 (Panel B) and CPS ≥ 10 (Panel C). Censored patients are marked with “|” in the graph. Numbers of patients at risk at indicated time points are shown below the x-axis. Median OS, and stratified hazard ratio for death are shown at the bottom of Kaplan–Meier curves. All hazard ratios were computed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Extended data figure legends and study protocol.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables 1–11

Supplementary Table 1. Summary of reasons for screening failure. Supplementary Table 2. Common reasons (≥5 incidences) for not meeting inclusion criteria or meeting exclusion criteria. Supplementary Table 3. PD-L1 positive TNBC prevalence determined by 22C3 and JS311 IHC assays. Supplementary Table 4. TNM classification for the ITT population. Supplementary Table 5. TNM classification for the PD-L1-positive subgroup. Supplementary Table 6. Subsequent anticancer therapy in intent-to-treat population after the study treatment. Supplementary Table 7. Objective response rate (INV-ORR), disease control rate (INV-DCR) and duration of response (INV-DoR) assessed by the investigator in accordance with RECIST v.1.1 in the PD-L1+ population at the interim PFS analysis. Supplementary Table 8. INV-ORR, INV-DCR and INV-DoR assessed by the investigator in accordance with RECIST v.1.1 in the ITT population at the interim PFS analysis. Supplementary Table 9. Study drug exposure. Supplementary Table 10. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported in at least 10% of the patients in either treatment arm. Supplementary Table 11. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) reported in more than one patient in either arm as assessed by the investigator.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

PFS by BICR source data in the PD-L1+ subgroup.

Source Data Fig. 3

OS source data in the PD-L1+ subgroup.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Z., Ouyang, Q., Sun, T. et al. Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med 30, 249–256 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02677-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02677-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer