Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A platform to induce and mature biomolecular condensates using chemicals and light

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates are membraneless compartments that impart spatial and temporal organization to cells. Condensates can undergo maturation, transitioning from dynamic liquid-like states into solid-like states associated with neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington’s disease. Despite their important roles, many aspects of condensate biology remain incompletely understood, requiring tools for acutely manipulating condensate-relevant processes within cells. Here we used the BCL6 BTB domain and its ligands BI-3802 and BI-3812 to create a chemical genetic platform, BTBolig, allowing inducible condensate formation and dissolution. We also developed optogenetic and chemical methods for controlled induction of condensate maturation, where we surprisingly observed recruitment of chaperones into the condensate core and formation of dynamic biphasic condensates. Our work provides insights into the interaction of condensates with proteostasis pathways and introduces a suite of chemical–genetic approaches to probe the role of biomolecular condensates in health and disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: BTBolig platform for inducible condensate manipulation.
Fig. 2: Comparison of BTBolig system properties.
Fig. 3: BTB condensates are differentially cleared to the aggresome and can be dissolved at later timepoints by addition of BI-3812.
Fig. 4: Inducible control of oligomerization-dependent activity using BTB2x-mCh.
Fig. 5: Light-induced CoSMo approach reveals dynamic chaperone–condensate interactions.
Fig. 6: Biphasic condensates formed with BTBIDR-FRB and rapamycin-induced CoSMo.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data analyzed during this study are included in the article and the Supplementary Information. Imaging data are provided as supplementary videos associated with this publication. Original TIFF formats of imaging data (not deposited in Source Data due to the large file sizes) are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, P. et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 483, 336–340 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Alberti, S. & Hyman, A. A. Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 196–213 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Banani, S. F. et al. Compositional control of phase-separated cellular bodies. Cell 166, 651–663 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal control of intracellular phase transitions using light-activated optodroplets. Cell 168, 159–171 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, L. et al. Controlling the material properties and rRNA processing function of the nucleolus using light. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17330–17335 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Protter, D. S. W. & Parker, R. Principles and properties of stress granules. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 668–679 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A. & Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 961–977 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel, A. et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162, 1066–1077 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taslimi, A. et al. An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function. Nat. Commun. 5, 4925 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dine, E., Gil, A. A., Uribe, G., Brangwynne, C. P. & Toettcher, J. E. Protein phase separation provides long-term memory of transient spatial stimuli. Cell Syst. 6, 655–663 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura, H. et al. Intracellular production of hydrogels and synthetic RNA granules by multivalent molecular interactions. Nat. Mater. 17, 79–89 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernández-Candia, C. N., Pearce, S. & Tucker, C. L. A modular tool to query and inducibly disrupt biomolecular condensates. Nat. Commun. 12, 1809 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bracha, D. et al. Mapping local and global liquid phase behavior in living cells using photo-oligomerizable seeds. Cell 175, 1467–1480 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, K., Song, D. & Jung, Y. Behavior control of membrane-less protein liquid condensates with metal ion-induced phase separation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5554 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Jove Navarro, M. et al. RNA is a critical element for the sizing and the composition of phase-separated RNA–protein condensates. Nat. Commun. 10, 3230 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Słabicki, M. et al. Small-molecule-induced polymerization triggers degradation of BCL6. Nature 588, 164–168 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nitsch, L. et al. BTBBCL6 dimers as building blocks for reversible drug-induced protein oligomerization. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100193 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Park, H. et al. Optogenetic protein clustering through fluorescent protein tagging and extension of CRY2. Nat. Commun. 8, 30 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Feric, M. et al. Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar subcompartments. Cell 165, 1686–1697 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston, J. A., Ward, C. L. & Kopito, R. R. Aggresomes: a cellular response to misfolded proteins. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1883–1898 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bugaj, L. J., Choksi, A. T., Mesuda, C. K., Kane, R. S. & Schaffer, D. V. Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 249–252 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, S. et al. Reversible protein inactivation by optogenetic trapping in cells. Nat. Methods 11, 633–636 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wend, S. et al. Optogenetic control of protein kinase activity in mammalian cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 280–285 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duan, L. et al. Understanding CRY2 interactions for optical control of intracellular signaling. Nat. Commun. 8, 547 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shkarina, K. et al. Optogenetic activators of apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202109038 (2022).

  28. He, L. et al. Optogenetic control of non-apoptotic cell death. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100424 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun, L. et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell 148, 213–227 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao, J. et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5322–5327 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Petrie, E. J., Czabotar, P. E. & Murphy, J. M. The structural basis of necroptotic cell death signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 53–63 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taslimi, A., Fields, K. M., Dahl, K. D., Liu, Q. & Tucker, C. L. Spatiotemporal control of necroptotic cell death and plasma membrane recruitment using engineered MLKL domains. Cell Death Discov. 8, 469 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Idevall-Hagren, O., Dickson, E. J., Hille, B., Toomre, D. K. & De Camilli, P. Optogenetic control of phosphoinositide metabolism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2316–E2323 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ray, S. et al. α-Synuclein aggregation nucleates through liquid–liquid phase separation. Nat. Chem. 12, 705–716 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wegmann, S. et al. Tau protein liquid–liquid phase separation can initiate tau aggregation. EMBO J. 37, e98049 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kennedy, M. J. et al. Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 7, 973–975 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu, H. et al. HSP70 chaperones RNA-free TDP-43 into anisotropic intranuclear liquid spherical shells. Science 371, eabb4309 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Boczek, E. E. et al. HspB8 prevents aberrant phase transitions of FUS by chaperoning its folded RNA-binding domain. Elife 10, e69377 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerres, N. et al. Chemically induced degradation of the oncogenic transcription factor BCL6. Cell Rep. 20, 2860–2875 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huynh, K. D. & Bardwell, V. J. The BCL-6 POZ domain and other POZ domains interact with the co-repressors N-CoR and SMRT. Oncogene 17, 2473–2484 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lam, S. S. et al. Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat. Methods 12, 51–54 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roux, K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M. & Burke, B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 196, 801–810 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Burke, K. A., Janke, A. M., Rhine, C. L. & Fawzi, N. L. Residue-by-residue view of in vitro FUS granules that bind the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 60, 231–241 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Caeser, R. et al. Genetic modification of primary human B cells to model high-grade lymphoma. Nat. Commun. 10, 4543 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hageman, J. & Kampinga, H. H. Computational analysis of the human HSPH/HSPA/DNAJ family and cloning of a human HSPH/HSPA/DNAJ expression library. Cell Stress Chaperones 14, 1–21 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Adriaenssens, E. et al. BAG3 Pro209 mutants associated with myopathy and neuropathy relocate chaperones of the CASA-complex to aggresomes. Sci. Rep. 10, 8755 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Picard, D., Suslova, E. & Briand, P.-A. 2-color photobleaching experiments reveal distinct intracellular dynamics of two components of the Hsp90 complex. Exp. Cell. Res. 312, 3949–3958 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Germline P granuoles are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science 324, 1729–1732 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R35GM136367 and R21MH134019) to C.L.T. C.N.H.-C. is a 2019 Latin American Fellow in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts. We thank Boehringer Ingelheim for generously providing BI-3802 and BI-3812 for use in studies. We also thank N. Fawzi, T. Inoue, D. Hodson, H. Kampinga, V. Timmerman, P. De Camilli, D. Picard and D. Altshuler for providing constructs (via Addgene) used in plasmid construction or studies, including MBP-FUS_FL_WT (Addgene, 98651)43; cyto-YFP-FKBPx5 (Addgene, 103777)13; MSCV-BCL6-t2A-BCL2 (Addgene, 135305)44; pcDNA5/FRT/TO GFP HSPA1L (Addgene, 19484), pcDNA5/FRT/TO GFP DNAJB1 (Addgene, 19495)45, pmScarlet-Hsp70 (HSPA1A) (Addgene, 163790)46, pEGFP.90beta (Addgene, 108221)47, mCherry-CRY2-5ptaseOCRL (Addgene, 66836) and iRFP-PH-PLCdelta1 (Addgene, 66841)33.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.L.T. and C.N.H.-C. conceived the project and wrote the paper. C.L.T., C.N.H.-C. and B.R.B. designed experiments, generated figures and edited the paper. C.N.H.-C. and B.R.B. performed and analyzed data for all experiments except Extended Data Figs. 5c, 6 and 7. E.H. performed experiments and analyzed data for Extended Data Figs. 5c, 6 and 7.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandra L. Tucker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks Eitan Lerner, Pilong Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Preclustering of BTBIDR-FRB prior to BI-3802 addition.

a) Quantification of % of BTBIDR-FRB in clusters in COS-7 cells pre and post 1 µm BI-3802 in nucleus and cytosol. Pre-clustering is predominantly nuclear. Mean and s.e.m., n = 34 cells from 5 independent experiments. b) Quantification of data from (a) from cells undergoing nuclear preclustering. A linear relationship between relative expression level (mean intensity/background) and nuclear preclustering (% of protein in cluster) is observed.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 BTBIDR-FRB and BTB-EGFP can undergo multiple rounds of condensate induction and reversal without loss of efficacy.

Shown are representative images (top) and quantification of condensate fluorescence (bottom). a) COS-7 cells expressing BTBIDR-FRB and EGFP (as a cell-fill) were treated with 1 µM BI-3802 (filled arrowheads) for 10–15 min then 10 µM BI-3812 (open arrowheads) for 7–15 min. Between each cycle, the media was changed (wash). Data is representative of 2 independent experiments. b) COS-7 cells expressing BTB-EGFP were treated with 1 µM BI-3802 for 10–20 min (filled arrowheads), then incubated with 10 µM BI-3812 for 15–20 min (open arrowheads). Samples were washed in PBS between each treatment cycle. Data is representative of 2 independent experiments. Scale bars, 10 µm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 FRAP of BTBIDR-FRB and BTBIDR at later timepoints reveals a condensate maturation process for BTBIDR-FRB.

a) Normalized FRAP analysis of BTBIDR-FRB condensates (in COS-7 cells incubated with BI-3802 for 1–1.5 h). Graph shows mean and s.e.m., n = 26 condensates, from 2 independent experiments. Inset shows representative condensates pre and post photobleach. Scale, 1 µm. b) Normalized FRAP analysis of BTBIDR-FRB condensates in COS-7 cells incubated with BI-3802 for 3–6 h. Graph shows mean and s.e.m., n = 12 condensates from a single experiment. Inset shows representative condensate pre and post photobleach. Scale, 1 µm. c) Normalized FRAP analysis of BTBIDR condensates 4 h post BI-3802. Graph shows mean and s.e.m., n = 11 cells from 2 independent experiments. Inset shows representative condensate pre and post photobleach. Scale, 1 µm. d) BTBIDR condensates in COS-7 cell treated with BI-3802 for 19 h (added 24 h post transfection). Representative of 3 independent experiments. Scale, 10 µm. e) Normalized FRAP analysis of BTBIDR condensates 19 h post BI-3802. Graph shows mean and s.e.m., n = 10 cells from a single experiment. Inset, representative condensates pre and post photobleach. Scale, 1 µm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Rapamycin-induced CoSMo.

a) Schematic of CoSMo approach with rapamycin (rap). b) COS-7 cells expressing BTBIDR-FRB and mCh-FKBP2x were treated with 1 µM BI-3802 for <30 min. Condensate circularity was quantified pre or post 333 nM rapamycin. Graph shows box plot (defined in Methods), n = 140 (-rap) or 325 (+rap) condensates from one experiment. **, p < .001, unpaired two-tailed t-test. c) FRAP analysis of BTBIDR-FRB condensates treated as in (b), pre or 10 min post rapamycin. Mean and s.e.m., n = 7 (pre) or 10 (post) condensates from 2 independent experiments. d, e) COS-7 cells expressing BTBIDR-FRB and mEGFP-FKBP2x treated with 1 µM BI-3802 for <30 min, before or 10 min post 333 nM rapamycin. Representative images in (d) (different cells, with higher magnification images at right), representative of 2 independent experiments. Scale, 10 µm. FRAP analysis in (e), mean and s.e.m., n = 12 (pre) or n = 13 condensates (post) from 2 independent experiments. f) FRAP analysis of condensates in cells expressing BTBIDR-FRB and mEGFP-FKBP2x, 30–60 min after 1 µM BI-3802 and 15–60 min after adding 10, 60, or 333 nM rapamycin. Mean and s.e.m., n = 10 (10 nM), 25 (60 nM), or 13 (333 nM) condensates from 2 independent experiments. g) COS-7 cells expressing BTBIDR-FRB and miRFP-FKBP5x < 30 min after 1 µM BI-3802, before and 10 min after 333 nM rapamycin. Images representative of 3 independent experiments. Scale, 10 µm. Higher magnification region at bottom. h) Condensate circularity with miRFP-FKBP5x recruitment as in (g), pre or 10 min post rapamycin. Data shows box plot (defined in Methods), n = 394 (pre) or 359 (post) condensates from 2 experiments. ****, p = 6.6 × 10–13, two-tailed unpaired t-test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Additional quantification of biphasic condensates induced by light using CoSMo approach.

a) Circularity of CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB condensates coexpressed with CRY2olig-mEGFP, 30 min post BI-3802, before and after light (488 nm, 5% laser power, 7x50ms pulses, every 30 s). Post light separated into monophasic or biphasic. Box plot (defined in Methods), n = 271 (pre-light), 103 (post, monophasic) or 62 (post, biphasic) condensates from 2 independent experiments. ns, not significant (p = .21 and .12), unpaired two-tailed t-test. b) Quantification of size of CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB condensates remaining monophasic or transitioning to biphasic, for COS-7 cells also expressing CRY2olig-mEGFP, treated with 1 µM BI-3802 then light. Size quantified before light treatment. Data represents individual points and median, n = 59 condensates from 2 independent experiments. **, p = .000004, unpaired two-tailed t-test. c) COS-7 cells expressing CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB, CRY2olig-miRFP, and GFP-tagged HSP90b, DNAJB1, or EGFP alone, treated with BI-3802 and light to induce biphasic condensates. Yellow boxes denote a higher magnification image of the boxed region. Scale, 10 µm. Images representative of 2 independent experiments. d) Normalized FRAP analysis of EGFP-HSPA1L within the core of biphasic CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB + CRY2olig-miRFP condensates (treated with BI-3802 and blue light). Mean and s.e.m., n = 5 condensates from one experiment. e) Condensates undergoing fusion in cells expressing CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB (labeled as ‘BTB’), CRY2olig-miRFP, and EGFP-HSPA1L (Hsp70), treated with 1 µm BI-3802 and exposed to blue light. Scale, 2 µm. Images representative of 3 independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Tracking biphasic condensates generated through light-induced CoSMo with extended light treatment.

a–c) COS-7 cells expressing CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB, CRY2olig-miRFP, and HSPA1L-EGFP were treated with BI-3802 then blue light (465 nm, 1.1 mW/cm2, 2 s pulse every 2 min) for 2 h. Images representative of 3 independent experiments. a) Representative image of cell after 2 h blue light. Condensates remain biphasic and circular and are distributed throughout the cell periphery. Scale, 10 µm. b) Timelapse of 2 h light-treated condensates that continue to merge and coalesce suggestive of a liquid-like state. Scale, 1 µm. c) Timelapse of 2 h light-treated condensates showing popping/release behavior with Hsp70. Scale, 1 µm. d-f) 24 h light treatment. COS-7 cells expressing CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB (mCh), CRY2olig-miRFP, and HSPA1L-EGFP were treated with 1 µM BI-3802 then blue light for 24 h (465 nm, 1.1 mW/cm2, 2 s pulse every 2 min). Images representative of 2 independent experiments. d) Cells show no aggresomal accumulation of CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB after 24 h light. Scale, 10 µm. e) Timelapse of 24 h light-treated biphasic condensates merging and coalescing. Scale, 1 µm. f) Timelapse of biphasic condensate showing popping and releasing behavior with HSPA1L-EGFP after 24 h of light. Scale, 1 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Removal of light after light-induced CoSMo does not result in transition of condensates to monophasic state.

a) COS-7 cells expressing HSPA1L-EGFP, CRY2olig-miRFP, and CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB (with a K70N non-fluorescent mCherry, to allow quantification of CRY2olig-miRFP signal without overlap with mCherry) were incubated 40 min with 1 µM BI-3802, then 488 nm light (10% laser power, 12 × 100 ms pulses, every 2 min) for 30 min, followed by 60 min with no 488 nm light to allow dissociation of CRY2olig, then a second 488 nm light treatment. Graphs show quantification of normalized EGFP and CRY2olig signal in clusters during experiment. Data normalized to the amount at the end of the initial light period, set to 1. Graphs show mean and s.e.m, n = 5 cells (EGFP) or 4 cells (CRY2olig), of a single experiment, independently performed 2 times with similar results. b) Individual cell data for experiment in (a) showing % of clustered CRY2olig-miRFP at each timepoint. n = 4 cells. c) A parallel experiment with identical design as in (a), but using wildtype mCherry to allow visualization of CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB signal. BTBIDR-FRB signal in condensates remains constant. Data normalized to the amount at the end of the initial light period, set to 1. Graph shows mean and s.e.m., n = 5 cells, of a single experiment, independently performed 2 times with similar results. d,e) Images of BTBIDR-FRB (mCh) and HSPA1L-EGFP (d) or CRY2olig-miRFP and HSPA1L-EGFP (coexpressed with K70N CIBN-BTBIDR-FRB) (e) signal in condensates 30 min after initial 488 nm light, or after 60 min without 488 nm light. Condensates do not revert to monophasic. Scale, 2 µm. Representative of 2 independent repeats.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 HSPA1L does not colocalize with initially formed rigid or liquid-like condensates.

Shown are representative images of COS-7 cells expressing EGFP-HSPA1L (or mScarlet-HSPA1L) and either BTB2x-mCh, CRY2olig-mCh, BTBIDR, or BTB-EGFP, 5 min to 2 h post inducing condensates (1 µM BI-3802 or light, as appropriate). Scale, 10 µm. Data representative of 2 independent experiments.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Model of biphasic condensate behavior.

Light-induced CoSMo results in condensates that retain liquid-like behavior, allowing dynamic interaction with chaperones. Rapamycin-induced CoSMo results in initial recruitment of Hsp70 and rearrangement to a shell/core structure. Subsequent gelation locks the shell structure in place but allows additional Hsp70 recruitment.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and Supplementary Video legends (Videos 1–10).

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Plasmid sequences and oligos. Sequences of plasmids created during this study and oligos used for cloning.

Supplementary Video 1

Induction and dissolution of BTB2x-mCh condensates.

Supplementary Video 2

Induction and dissolution of BTBIDR condensates.

Supplementary Video 3

Induction and dissolution of BTBIDR-FRB condensates.

Supplementary Video 4

Induction and dissolution of BTB-EGFP condensates.

Supplementary Video 5

Cells undergoing multiple rounds of formation and then dissolution of BTB-EGFP condensates.

Supplementary Video 6

BI-3812-dependent dissolution of BTB-EYFP fiber-like structures.

Supplementary Video 7

Light-induced formation of biphasic condensates.

Supplementary Video 8

Dynamics of light-induced BTB/chaperone biphasic condensates.

Supplementary Video 9

Magnified view of 'popping and chaperone release' behavior.

Supplementary Video 10

CoSMo-induced transition of BTBIDR-FRB condensates, resulting in recruitment of chaperones and transition to a biphasic state.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for Fig. 1d.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2a–c,e.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Fig. 3e.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Fig. 4c,f,i.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data for Fig. 5c,e,g.

Source Data Fig. 6

Source data for Fig. 6a,c,e,f,h–j,l.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 1.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 4.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 7.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez-Candia, C.N., Brady, B.R., Harrison, E. et al. A platform to induce and mature biomolecular condensates using chemicals and light. Nat Chem Biol 20, 452–462 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01520-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing