Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

It takes two to think

Nature Biotechnology volume 42, pages 18–19 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

At the heart of science is a creative ‘night science’ process, in which we haphazardly cobble together the ideas that will become its future building blocks1,2. Despite the variety of creative approaches practiced by different scientists, one tried-and-true — though often overlooked — trick for generating new ideas stands out. It may sound trivial, yet it is as reliable as it is simple: talk to someone. By talking with other people, we not only pool the information or ideas that each of us individually lacks, but we are also able to improvise new thoughts that are not accessible to us alone.

Language imposes structure on our thinking and forces us to project a tangled network of thoughts into a linear, logical string of words and ideas. We often do not even know what we are thinking until we express it, either in writing or in speech. An intelligent interlocutor can offer crucial additional benefits over a passive medium by exposing flaws in our reasoning, suggesting new directions of thought, or pointing out supporting or contradictory evidence that we may have overlooked3. Mental breakthroughs are often achieved by escaping from an established habit of thought, a step that is much more easily taken if we engage our thinking with that of another. Communication also serves an important psychological function: our morale thrives on the encouragement that we get from the feedback of someone who understands our work and our motivations4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Jacob, F. The Statue Within: An Autobiography (CSHL Press, 1988).

  2. Yanai, I. & Lercher, M. Genome Biol. 20, 179 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beveridge, W. I. B. The Art of Scientific Investigation (William Heinemann, 1950).

  4. Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. The Nature of Human Creativity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).

  5. Asch, S. E. in Groups, Leadership and Men (ed. Guetzknow, H.) 177–190 (Carnegie, 1951).

  6. Wu, L., Wang, D. & Evans, J. A. Nature 566, 378–382 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity: The Psychology of Discovery and Invention (Harper Collins, 2009).

  8. Yanai, I. & Lercher, M. Daniel Kahneman and the sunk-cost fallacy. Night Science Podcast, https://nightscience.buzzsprout.com/1744020/11366219 (2022).

  9. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Routledge, 2018).

  10. Seelig, T. Innovation Engine (Harper Collins, 2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Systems Genetics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA

    Itai Yanai

  2. Institute for Computer Science, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Martin J. Lercher

  3. Department of Biology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Martin J. Lercher

Authors
  1. Itai Yanai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin J. Lercher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itai Yanai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yanai, I., Lercher, M.J. It takes two to think. Nat Biotechnol 42, 18–19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02074-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02074-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing