Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Excitonic topological order in imbalanced electron–hole bilayers

Abstract

Correlation and frustration play essential roles in physics, giving rise to novel quantum phases1,2,3,4,5,6. A typical frustrated system is correlated bosons on moat bands, which could host topological orders with long-range quantum entanglement4. However, the realization of moat-band physics is still challenging. Here, we explore moat-band phenomena in shallowly inverted InAs/GaSb quantum wells, where we observe an unconventional time-reversal-symmetry breaking excitonic ground state under imbalanced electron and hole densities. We find that a large bulk gap exists, encompassing a broad range of density imbalances at zero magnetic field (B), accompanied by edge channels that resemble helical transport. Under an increasing perpendicular B, the bulk gap persists, and an anomalous plateau of Hall signals appears, which demonstrates an evolution from helical-like to chiral-like edge transport with a Hall conductance approximately equal to e2/h at 35 tesla, where e is the elementary charge and h is Planck’s constant. Theoretically, we show that strong frustration from density imbalance leads to a moat band for excitons, resulting in a time-reversal-symmetry breaking excitonic topological order, which explains all our experimental observations. Our work opens up a new direction for research on topological and correlated bosonic systems in solid states beyond the framework of symmetry-protected topological phases, including but not limited to the bosonic fractional quantum Hall effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Finite-momentum excitons in InAs/GaSb quantum wells.
Fig. 2: Gap energies and anomalous Hall plateau in topological EI.
Fig. 3: Transport under high magnetic fields.
Fig. 4: The mechanism for excitonic moat band and ETO.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are included in this paper. Additional data that support the plots and other analyses in this work are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N. & Schrieffer, J. R. Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 108, 1175–1204 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Knox, R. S. Theory of excitons. Solid State Phys. Suppl. 5, 100 (1963).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Keldysh, L. V. & Kopaev, Y. V.Possible instability of the semimetallic state with respect to coulombic interaction. Fiz. Tverd. Tela 6, 2791–2798 (1964). [Sov. Phys. Solid State 6, 2219–2224 (1965)].

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen, X.-G. Choreographed entanglement dances: topological states of quantum matter. Science 363, eaal3099 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L. & Gossard, A. C. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559–1562 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balents, L. Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464, 199–208 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sedrakyan, T. A., Glazman, L. I. & Kamenev, A. Absence of Bose condensation on lattice with moat bands. Phys. Rev. B 89, 201112(R) (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sedrakyan, T. A., Kamenev, A. & Glazman, L. I. Composite fermion state of spin-orbit-coupled bosons. Phys. Rev. A 86, 063639 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedrakyan, T. A., Glazman, L. I. & Kamenev, A. Spontaneous formation of a nonuniform chiral spin liquid in a moat-band lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 037203 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sedrakyan, T. A., Galitski, V. M. & Kamenev, A. Statistical transmutation in Floquet driven optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 195301 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalmeyer, V. & Laughlin, R. B. Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095–2098 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Du, L. et al. Evidence for a topological excitonic insulator in InAs/GaSb bilayers. Nat. Commun. 8, 1971 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jérome, D., Rice, T. M. & Kohn, W. Exciton insulator. Phys. Rev. 158, 462–475 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulde, P. & Ferrell, R. A. Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field. Phys. Rev. 135, A550–A563 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Larkin, A. I. & Ovchinnikov, Y. N. Inhomogeneous state of superconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762–769 (1965).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Casalbuoni, R. & Nardulli, G. Inhomogeneous superconductivity in condensed matter and QCD. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 263–320 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buzdin, A. I. & Kachkachi, H. Generalized Ginzburg–Landau theory for nonuniform FFLO superconductors. Phys. Lett. A 255, 341–348 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Varley, J. R. & Lee, D. K. K. Structure of exciton condensates in imbalanced electron-hole bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 94, 174519 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Efimkin, D. K. & Lozovik, Yu. E. Electron-hole pairing with nonzero momentum in a graphene bilayer. JETP 113, 880–886 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parish, M. M., Marchetti, F. M. & Littlewood, P. B. Supersolidity in electron-hole bilayers with a large density imbalance. EPL 95, 27007 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seradjeh, B. Topological exciton condensation of imbalanced electrons and holes. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235146 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brazovskii, S. A. Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 68, 175–185 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Du, L., Knez, I., Sullivan, G. & Du, R.-R. Robust helical edge transport in gated InAs/GaSb bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096802 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Büttiker, M. Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors. Phys. Rev. B 38, 9375–9389 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, T., Wang, P., Sullivan, G., Lin, X. & Du, R.-R. Low-temperature conductivity of weakly interacting quantum spin Hall edges in strained-layer InAs/GaInSb. Phys. Rev. B 96, 241406 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. König, M. et al. Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells. Science 318, 766–770 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Du, L. et al. Tuning edge states in strained-layer InAs/GaInSb quantum spin Hall insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 056803 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Du, L. et al. Coulomb drag in topological wires separated by an air gap. Nat. Electron. 4, 573–578 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Y. et al. Time-reversal-symmetry-broken quantum spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 066602 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pikulin, D. I. & Hyart, T. Interplay of exciton condensation and the quantum spin Hall effect in InAs/GaSb bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 176403 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xue, F. & MacDonald, A. H. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking nematic insulators near quantum spin Hall phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 186802 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaöyrynen, J. I., Goldstein, M. & Glazman, L. I. Helical edge resistance introduced by charge puddles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216402 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Eisenstein, J. P. & MacDonald, A. H. Bose–Einstein condensation of excitons in bilayer electron systems. Nature 432, 691–694 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma, L. et al. Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers. Nature 598, 585–589 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, X. et al. Crossover between strongly coupled and weakly coupled exciton superfluids. Science 375, 205–209 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jain, J. K. Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199–202 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Halperin, B. I., Lee, P. A. & Read, N. Theory of the half-filled Landau level. Phys. Rev. B 47, 7312–7343 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gopalakrishnan, S., Lamacraft, A. & Goldbart, P. M. Universal phase structure of dilute Bose gases with Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. A 84, 061604(R) (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu, X. et al. Electrically tuning many-body states in a Coulomb-coupled InAs/InGaSb double layer. Phys. Rev. B 100, 165309 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Knez, I., Du, R.-R. & Sullivan, G. Evidence for helical edge modes in inverted InAs/GaSb quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 136603 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work at Nanjing University was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFA1403601) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 12274206, 12074177 and 12034014), Program for Innovative Talents and Entrepreneur in Jiangsu and the Xiaomi Foundation. The work at Peking University was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB28000000), National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2019YFA0308400) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11921005). The InAs/GaSb quantum well structures were prepared by molecular beam epitaxy by G. Sullivan. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement no. DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.W., T.A.S. and B.W. conceived the theoretical project. R.W. developed the theoretical model and performed the calculations supervised by B.W., R.-R.D. and L.-J.D. conceived the experimental project. L.-J.D. fabricated devices and performed transport experiments. L.-J.D. and R.-R.D. analysed the data. R.W., L.-J.D. and R.-R.D. co-wrote the manuscript with input from other authors. All authors discussed the results. R.-R.D. provided overall coordination of the whole project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Baigeng Wang, Lingjie Du or Rui-Rui Du.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Dmitry Efimkin and the other, anonymous, reviewers(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Extraction of energy gap Δ under 0 T.

(a). Bulk conductance of the Corbino device σc as a function of Vf under 0 T at different temperatures. (b) and (c). Arrhenius plot of the conductance σc at Vf from −1.8 V to −2.4 V, and from −2.5 V to −3.2 V, respectively. The data can be fit by σc exp (−Δ/2kbT) to obtain Δ. Dashed lines are guides to the eye. For Vf≥−2.1 V or Vf≤−2.9 V, the σc exhibits non-activated temperature dependence, which is also plotted in panel (b) for comparison. Note that according to the ETO theory, as the e-h density imbalance increases, the gap that opens around the Fermi level would decrease towards zero, which could describe the data in Vf≥−2.1 V or Vf≤−2.9 V.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Estimation of carrier densities.

(a). B/eRxy versus Vf in a 50 μm × 50 μm Hall-bar at 300 mK under B= 1 T. Inset shows a schematic of the asymmetric Hall-bar, and the dashed box region is covered by the front gate. The yellow dashed line is obtained from the integration of measured capacitance over Vf, representing the net-carrier density |nenp| (see ref. 12). In the linear regime of B/eRxy, np is negligible with |nenp| ≈ ne, and the yellow line represents ne (blue arrow). B/eRxy deviates from the yellow line due to the increased np in the two-carrier transport. In this regime, Vf would tune both ne and np. Since the geometry capacitance remains constant and dominates the measured capacitance, |nenp| would still change linearly with Vf and follow the yellow line. The green dashed line represents the Vf dependence of ne (blue arrow) in the two-carrier transport regime12. The difference between the green and yellow lines corresponds to np (red arrow). At Vf = −2 V, B/eRxy drops because the topological edge occurs and contributes a large Rxx component on the Rxy due to the asymmetrical Hall-bar geometry12. The edge state persists in a voltage range from −2 V to −3 V (topological EI regime). At Vf = −2 V, ne ≈1.1 × 1011 cm−2 and np ≈4.5 × 1010 cm−2. From −2 V to −2.5 V, the e-h density imbalance regime with electrons as the majority carrier overlaps the topological EI regime. Symmetrically, a similar case occurs from −2.5 V to −3 V but with holes as the major carrier. (b). Calculated ne and np using a two-carrier model (Methods). The calculated results agree well with those obtained in (a).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Summary of edge resistance against edge length measured in the topological EI from shallowly inverted InAs/GaSb QWs with different device geometries.

Rm is the measured resistance. Rq denotes quantized values calculated by the LB formula, that is, h/2e2 (Hall bar, circle)23, h/4e2 (H bar, up-triangle), h/2e2 (two terminal bar, down-triangle)23, and h/4e2 (π bar, square)23. The edge lengths are depicted between black arrows in the devices. White arrows show the direction of the current. The transport of the edge state in the mesoscopic devices with length <λ is quantized. In the macroscopic devices, the backscattering occurs between two channels through virtual contacts42 where channels equilibrate over λ; within λ, the helical-like edge transport is ballistic and gives the value of a quantum resistor h/2e2. The up-left inset shows that the quantized resistance in the π bar device and the extracted coherence length λ from the macroscopic Hall bars are independent of temperatures up to 4 K. The lower-left inset shows the schematic plot of counter-propagating edge channels with a bulk EI state and arrows on the perimeters indicate the helical-like feature of the edge channels.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Longitudinal (top panel) and Hall (bottom panel) conductivities under magnetic fields up to 18 T.

(a–g) Longitudinal (top panel) and Hall (bottom panel) conductivities, σxx and σxy, converted from Rxx, Rxy measured in a 50 μm × 50 μm Hall-bar device C as a function of Vf at 20 mK under B up to 18 T. Magneto-transport below 8 T repeat that in device A (Fig. 2). The purple marks the transition regime from the QH states to topological EI. At 4 T, a σxx peak starts to emerge in the transition regime, and σxy collapses. The σxx peaks become more visible for higher B. Meanwhile, σxy in the topological EI regime increases because the edge channels start to separate under B. At 18 T, σxy between the v = 1 QH state and topological EI is close and the σxy collapse is replaced by a bump due to two-carrier transport. The corresponding σxx peak is smeared due to the residual conductance in the topological EI regime. \({\sigma }_{{\rm{xx}}}^{{\rm{EI}}}\) (in the topological EI regime) starts to decrease at 18 T and approaches zero at 35 T (Fig. 3c). The shrinking of the inner loop has two results: the inner loop is separated from the outer loop (at low B); the inner loop is separated from the contacts and the outer loop (at high B). The two results have opposite effects on \({\sigma }_{{\rm{xx}}}^{{\rm{EI}}}\) in a macroscopic Hall-bar (\({\sigma }_{{\rm{xx}}}^{{\rm{EI}}}\) < e2/2h at 0 T): the former makes \({\sigma }_{{\rm{xx}}}^{{\rm{EI}}}\) increase towards e2/2h due to reduced backscattering between the edge channels; the latter makes \({\sigma }_{{\rm{xx}}}^{{\rm{EI}}}\) decrease to zero since backscattering between the inner loop and the contacts decreases, and the outer loop works like a single chiral edge.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Schematic plot illustrating the ETO edge state on one side of a Hall bar.

Left and Middle, B = 0: The bulk of the imbalanced e–h bilayer opens a many-body gap, with its edge state formed by a pair of the weakly-bound particle (−e) and hole (+e) channels, as demonstrated by the theory of ETO; the robustness of the edge states is protected by a BCS-like bulk gap. Considering the quasiparticle-quasihole symmetry near the Fermi level, the excitonic edge state is viewed as equivalent to a helical-like state containing two oppositely propagating (−e) channels (Sec. V of Supplementary Information). Right, when B is applied, the two channels are spatially separated due to the Lorentz force, forming inner and outer loops in a Hall bar. The dotted lines denote the scattering between the two channels, which decays with increasing B but always exists in realistic samples, explaining why the Hall resistance does not exactly quantize in chiral-like transport.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Calculation of the ETO edge transport under B.

To calculate the edge resistance, we consider a six-terminal Hall bar with edge separation under B and virtual contacts (Methods). (a) and (b) respectively show the calculated Rxx and Rxy as functions of B compared with the experimental data. Data Rxx in (a) is measured from the Hall-bar device C (see Extended Data Fig. 4), and data in (b) is extracted from Rxy in Fig. 2b. The inset to (a) schematically demonstrates the effect of B on the two edge channels. The error bars in (b) come from the uncertainties in the experimental Rxy in the topological EI regime.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Summary of the ETO properties.

We make a conceptual analogy of ETO formed in zero magnetic field to the electronic 1/m Laughlin liquid that is formed in an external magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 8 The symmetric term \({{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{{\bf{xy}}}^{{\bf{s}}}\) from \({{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{{\bf{xy}}}^{{\bf{EI}}}\).

\({R}_{{\rm{xy}}}^{{\rm{s}}}\) is shown as a function of Vf at different B in device B.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Gap Energies under perpendicular magnetic fields B.

(a) The Arrhenius plot of the Corbino conductance σc at the CNP with temperatures under fixed B. The Corbino conductance is normalized to the values at 5 K. The EI gap energy under a magnetic field is deduced through σc exp (−Δ/2kbT), their values are displayed in (b). The error bars come from the uncertainty in the extraction of gap energy from the Arrhenius plot. (c) shows the voltage ranges where the state in the topological EI regime is insulating (σc < 0.2 μS) at B. Obviously, as B increases, the EI gap becomes larger, but the voltage ranges of the insulating state in the topological EI regime remain nearly the same.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections I–VII, Figs. 1–14 and References.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Sedrakyan, T.A., Wang, B. et al. Excitonic topological order in imbalanced electron–hole bilayers. Nature 619, 57–62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06065-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06065-w

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing