Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Magnetic-field-sensitive charge density waves in the superconductor UTe2

Abstract

The intense interest in triplet superconductivity partly stems from theoretical predictions of exotic excitations such as non-Abelian Majorana modes, chiral supercurrents and half-quantum vortices1,2,3,4. However, fundamentally new and unexpected states may emerge when triplet superconductivity appears in a strongly correlated system. Here we use scanning tunnelling microscopy to reveal an unusual charge-density-wave (CDW) order in the heavy-fermion triplet superconductor UTe2 (refs. 5,6,7,8). Our high-resolution maps reveal a multi-component incommensurate CDW whose intensity gets weaker with increasing field, with the CDW eventually disappearing at the superconducting critical field Hc2. To understand the phenomenology of this unusual CDW, we construct a Ginzburg–Landau theory for a uniform triplet superconductor coexisting with three triplet pair-density-wave states. This theory gives rise to daughter CDWs that would be sensitive to magnetic field owing to their origin in a pair-density-wave state and provides a possible explanation for our data. Our discovery of a CDW state that is sensitive to magnetic fields and strongly intertwined with superconductivity provides important information for understanding the order parameters of UTe2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and the (011) cleave surface in real space and Fourier space.
Fig. 2: Spectroscopic imaging of the three distinct CDW orders.
Fig. 3: Suppression and mirror-symmetry breaking of the CDWs in a perpendicular magnetic field.
Fig. 4: Disappearance of the CDWs above Hc2 for magnetic field tilted at 11° to the [011] direction.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All of the data for the main figures have been uploaded to the Illinois Databank (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-1713879_V1).

References

  1. Sigrist, M. & Ueda, K. Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reed, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitaev, A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanov, D. A. Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ran, S. et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science 365, 684–687 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in heavy fermion UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 043702 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ran, S. et al. Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 15, 1250–1254 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in UTe2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 243002 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiao, L. et al. Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2. Nature 579, 523–527 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes, I. M. et al. Multicomponent superconducting order parameter in UTe2. Science 373, 797–801 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shishidou, T., Suh, H. G., Brydon, P. M. R., Weinert, M. & Agterberg, D. Topological band and superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104504 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamine, G. et al. Superconducting properties of heavy fermion UTe2 revealed by 125Te-nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 113703 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Metz, T. et al. Point-node gap structure of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 220504(R) (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kittaka, S. et al. Orientation of point nodes and nonunitary triplet pairing tuned by the easy-axis magnetization in UTe2. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032014(R) (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bae, S. et al. Anomalous normal fluid response in a chiral superconductor UTe2. Nat. Commun. 12, 2644 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, Y., Madhavan, V. & Raghu, S. Majorana fermion arcs and the local density of states of UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 105, 174520 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutanu, V. et al. Low temperature crystal structure of the unconventional spin-triplet superconductor UTe2 from single-crystal neutron diffraction. Acta Cryst. B76, 137–143 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Setyawan, W. & Curtarolo, S. High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: challenges and tools. Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 299–312 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S. A. & Tranquada, J. M. Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Himeda, A., Kato, T. & Ogata, M. Stripe states with spatially oscillating d-wave superconductivity in the two-dimensional t−t′−J model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117001 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berg, E. et al. Dynamical layer decoupling in a stripe-ordered high-Tc superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127003 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berg, E., Fradkin, E. & Kivelson, S. A. Theory of the striped superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 79, 064515 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y., Agterberg, D. F. & Chubukov, A. Coexistence of charge-density-wave and pair-density-wave orders in underdoped cuprates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197001 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dai, Z., Zhang, Y.-H., Senthil, T. & Lee, P. A. Pair-density waves, charge-density waves, and vortices in high-Tc cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 97, 174511 (2018).

  25. Agterberg, D. F. et al. The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and beyond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 231–270 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fulde, P. & Ferrell, R. A. Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field. Phys. Rev. 135, A550–A563 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Larkin, A. I. & Ovchinnikov, Y. I. Inhomogeneous state of superconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762–769 (1965).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanaguri, T. et al. A ‘checkerboard’ electronic crystal state in lightly hole-doped Ca2-xNaxCuO2Cl2. Nature 430, 1001–1005 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McElroy, K. et al. Coincidence of checkerboard charge order and antinodal state decoherence in strongly underdoped superconducting Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 197005 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kohsaka, Y. et al. An intrinsic bond-centered electronic glass with unidirectional domains in underdoped cuprates. Science 315, 1380–1385 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mesaros, A. et al. Commensurate 4a0-period charge density modulations throughout the Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x pseudogap regime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12661–12666 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamidian, M. et al. Detection of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. Nature 532, 343–347 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruan, W. et al. Visualization of the periodic modulation of Cooper pairing in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Phys. 14, 1178–1182 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Edkins, S. D. et al. Magnetic field–induced pair density wave state in the cuprate vortex halo. Science 364, 976–980 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ortiz, B. R. et al. New kagome prototype materials: discovery of KV3Sb5, RbV3Sb5, and CsV3Sb5. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 094407 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang, Y. X. et al. Unconventional chiral charge order in kagome superconductor KV3Sb5. Nat. Mater. 20, 1353–1357 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, H. et al. Cascade of correlated electron states in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5. Nature 599, 216–221 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, H. et al. Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling Kagome superconductor. Nature 599, 222–228 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Neupert, T. et al. Charge order and superconductivity in kagome materials. Nat. Phys. 18, 137–143 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mielke, C. et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superconductor. Nature 602, 245–250 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nie, L. et al. Charge-density-wave-driven electronic nematicity in a kagome superconductor. Nature 604, 59–64 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Duan, C. et al. Incommensurate spin fluctuations in the spin-triplet superconductor candidate UTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 237003 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gelessus, A., Thiel, W. & Weber, W. Multipoles and symmetry. J. Chem. Educ. 72, 505–508 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Berg, E., Fradkin, E. & Kivelson, S. Charge-4e superconductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors. Nat. Phys. 5, 830–833 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Kivelson and Q. Si for useful discussions. STM studies at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign were supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under award number DE-SC0022101. V.M. acknowledges partial support from Gordon and Betty More Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant GBMF4860 and the Quantum Materials Program at CIFAR where she is a Fellow. Theoretical work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation through the grant DMR 1725401 and DMR 2225920 at the University of Illinois (E.F. and L.N.) and by a postdoctoral fellowship of the Institute for Condensed Matter Theory of the University of Illinois (L.N.). J.M.-M. acknowledges support by ARO MURI grant number W911NF2020166. Research at the University of Maryland was supported by the Department of Energy award number DE-SC-0019154 (sample characterization), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant number GBMF9071 (materials synthesis), the National Science Foundation under grant number DMR-2105191 (sample preparation), the Maryland Quantum Materials Center and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. S.R.S. acknowledges support from the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cooperative Agreement 70NANB17H301.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.A. and V.M. conceived the experiments. The single crystals were provided by S.R., S.R.S., J.P. and N.P.B. M.R. carried out the Laue characterization of the single crystals. A.A. and A.R. obtained the STM data. A.A. and V.M. carried out the analysis and J.M.-M., L.N. and E.F. provided the theoretical input on the interpretation of the data. A.A., V.M., J.M.-M. and E.F. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya Madhavan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Laue diffraction from the (011) aligned crystal.

Laue diffraction of a single UTe2 crystal which was used for the STM study is shown. A few specific (hkl) surfaces are marked.

Extended Data Fig. 2 LDOS at 300 mK.

LDOS maps obtained at several energies above and below EF.

Extended Data Fig. 3 FFT of LDOS at 300 mK.

FFTs of LDOS maps obtained at several energies above and below EF.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Inverse FFT of the CDW peaks, FFT showing primary and secondary CDW peaks and low energy dI/dV spectra.

a, Topography obtained on the (011) surface (same area as that shown in Fig. 1c of the manuscript. Inset shows the corresponding FFT with the CDW peaks circled in orange. b, Inverse FFT obtained from the circled CDW peaks (in orange) allowing real space visualization of the CDW modulations. c, FFT at the EF where the primary and secondary CDWs are shown using red circles and blue circles respectively, d, Linecut of the dI/dV spectra (shown in grey) and the average dI/dV spectrum (shown in red) obtained along the Te-chains. Apart from the Fano lineshape associated with the Kondo resonance, the individual spectra and the average dI/dV spectrum show an additional low energy feature (slope change around −1 meV to +2 meV) shown by the blue shaded region.

Extended Data Fig. 5 LDOS in presence of a 10.5 T magnetic field.

LDOS maps obtained at several energies in a perpendicular magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 6 FFT of LDOS in presence of a 10.5 T magnetic field.

FFTs of LDOS maps obtained at several energies in a perpendicular magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Partial suppression and mirror symmetry breaking of the CDWs in the integrated FFT signal.

a-b, Comparison of FFTs of integrated signal obtained from integrating LDOS maps below EF for a 0 T field and 10.5 T field. The FFT of the integrated signal also shows similar behavior as the FFT of individual energy slices. ce, Linecuts obtained along 3 different directions for the 3 CDWs illustrating the mirror symmetry breaking. d is clearly more suppressed than c.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Second and third sample-tip combinations for perpendicular magnetic field showing reproducibility of the partial suppression and mirror symmetry breaking of the CDW at 10.5 T.

ab, Second dataset obtained with a different tip-sample combination showing the partial suppression and mirror symmetry breaking of the CDW in a perpendicular magnetic field. The FFTs shown have the same intensity scale. cg, Series of FFT of topographies as a function of increasing magnetic field perpendicular to the [011] surface with a third sample-tip combination. (V = 20 mV, I = 100 pA) The intensity scale of all FFTs has been kept constant. The critical field for the mirror-symmetry breaking in \({q}_{1}^{CDW}\) and \({q}_{2}^{CDW}\) is close to 10 T.

Extended Data Fig. 9 FFTs showing the suppression of the CDWs at positive bias in a 11-degree tilted magnetic field.

ac, Series of FFT of topographies obtained as a function of increasing magnetic field at 11 degrees with respect to the [011] direction with a different tip. (V = 40 mV, I = 120 pA). The intensity scale of all FFTs has been kept constant. The surface tilt is measured using the tilt correction function in the Nanonis module. df, Fourier transform linecuts obtained along 3 different directions of the CDWs as a function of magnetic field, showing clear suppression of the peak amplitudes above 9 T.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Additional dataset with a different tip showing reproducibility of the suppression of the CDWs in a 11-degree tilted magnetic field.

af, Additional dataset showing a series of FFT of topographies obtained as a function of increasing magnetic field at 11 degrees with respect to the [011] direction with a different tip. (V = 50 mV, I = 150 pA). The intensity scale of all FFTs has been kept constant. The surface tilt is measured using the tilt correction function in the Nanonis module.

Extended Data Fig. 11 Melting of the CDWs as a function of temperature.

ac, FFTs of LDOS maps obtained as a function of temperature. The CDWs persist till 4 K and have disappeared by 10 K.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aishwarya, A., May-Mann, J., Raghavan, A. et al. Magnetic-field-sensitive charge density waves in the superconductor UTe2. Nature 618, 928–933 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06005-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06005-8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing