Abstract
Mounting concern over the global decline of pollinators has fuelled calls for investigating their role in maintaining plant diversity1,2. Theory predicts that competition for pollinators can stabilize interactions between plant species by providing opportunities for niche differentiation3, while at the same time can drive competitive imbalances that favour exclusion4. Here we empirically tested these contrasting effects by manipulating competition for pollinators in a way that predicts its long-term implications for plant coexistence. We subjected annual plant individuals situated across experimentally imposed gradients in neighbour density to either ambient insect pollination or a pollen supplementation treatment alleviating competition for pollinators. The vital rates of these individuals informed plant population dynamic models predicting the key theoretical metrics of species coexistence. Competition for pollinators generally destabilized the interactions between plant species, reducing the proportion of pairs expected to coexist. Interactions with pollinators also influenced the competitive imbalances between plant species, effects that are expected to strengthen with pollinator decline, potentially disrupting plant coexistence. Indeed, results from an experiment simulating pollinator decline showed that plant species experiencing greater reductions in floral visitation also suffered greater declines in population growth rate. Our results reveal that competition for pollinators may weaken plant coexistence by destabilizing interactions and contributing to competitive imbalances, information critical for interpreting the impacts of pollinator decline.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6474018. The data were recorded in Microsoft Excel (v. 16.48) and analysed in R (v. 3.6.3). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Codes are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6474018. The figures were plotted in Mathematica (v. 12.0).
References
Potts, S. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 345–353 (2010).
Thomann, M., Imbert, E., Devaux, C. & Cheptou, P.-O. Flowering plants under global pollinator decline. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 353–359 (2013).
Pauw, A. Can pollination niches facilitate plant coexistence? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 30–37 (2013).
Johnson, C. A. How mutualisms influence the coexistence of competing species. Ecology 102, e03346 (2021).
Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).
Tilman, D. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58, 3–15 (1990).
Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–358 (2000).
Mitchell, R. J., Flanagan, R. J., Brown, B. J., Waser, N. M. & Karron, J. D. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 103, 1403–1413 (2009).
Morales, C. L. & Traveset, A. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett. 12, 716–728 (2009).
Jones, E. I., Bronstein, J. L. & Ferrière, R. The fundamental role of competition in the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1256, 66–88 (2012).
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M. & Price, M. V. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 2605–2611 (2004).
Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. Mutualistic Networks (Princeton University Press, 2013).
Bascompte, J. Mutualism and biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 29, R467–R470 (2019).
Chesson, P. Updates on mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. J. Ecol. 106, 1773–1794 (2018).
Levin, D. A. & Anderson, W. W. Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. Am. Nat. 104, 455–467 (1970).
Kunin, W. & Iwasa, Y. Pollinator foraging strategies in mixed floral arrays: density effects and floral constancy. Theor. Popul. Biol. 49, 232–263 (1996).
Lanuza, J. B., Bartomeus, I. & Godoy, O. Opposing effects of floral visitors and soil conditions on the determinants of competitive outcomes maintain species diversity in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 21, 865–874 (2018).
Thomson, J. Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment by flower-feeding insects. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 49–59 (1981).
Knight, T. M. et al. Reflections on, and visions for, the changing field of pollination ecology. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1282–1295 (2018).
Biella, P. et al. Experimental loss of generalist plants reveals alterations in plant-pollinator interactions and a constrained flexibility of foraging. Sci. Rep. 9, 7376 (2019).
Brosi, B. & Briggs, H. M. Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13044–13048 (2013).
Addicott, J. F. in The Biology of Mutualism (ed. Boucher, D. H.) 217–247 (Croom Helm, 1985).
Knight, T. M. et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 467–497 (2005).
Bartomeus, I., Saavedra, S., Rohr, R. P. & Godoy, O. Experimental evidence of the importance of multitrophic structure for species persistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023872118 (2021).
Levine, J. M., Bascompte, J., Adler, P. B. & Allesina, S. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546, 56–64 (2017).
Saavedra, S. et al. A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. 87, 470–486 (2017).
Rinella, M. J., Strong, D. J. & Vermeire, L. T. Omitted variable bias in studies of plant interactions. Ecology 101, e03020 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. von Rütte, A. Bieger, C. Hess, M. Negreiros, A. Reid and R. Zäch for their work in the field and laboratory; J. Johnson (Life Science Studios) for the illustrations in Figs. 1 and 3; W. Petry and S. Hart for statistical advice; and laboratory members at the ETH Zürich and Princeton University for comments on the manuscript. C.A.J. was supported by the ETH Zürich Center for Adaptation to Changing Environments and funds from Princeton University. J.M.L. was supported by NSF grant DEB 2022213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.A.J. and J.M.L. designed the research. C.A.J. performed the experiments and analysed the data. P.D. and C.A.J. conducted the pollinator observations. C.A.J. and J.M.L. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Peter Chesson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Discussion; Supplementary Tables 1–4 and Supplementary References.
Supplementary Data
This file contains source data for Supplementary Fig. 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, C.A., Dutt, P. & Levine, J.M. Competition for pollinators destabilizes plant coexistence. Nature 607, 721–725 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04973-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04973-x
This article is cited by
-
M. N. Van Dyke et al. reply
Nature (2024)
-
Exposure to an insecticide formulation alters chemosensory orientation, but not floral scent detection, in buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris)
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi equalize differences in plant fitness and facilitate plant species coexistence through niche differentiation
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2024)
-
Flowering phenology patterns promotes pollination facilitation in coexisting Anthurium species from a mountain forest in Colombia
Arthropod-Plant Interactions (2024)
-
Does biodiversity affect Olive fly populations? Evidence from different understorey treatments
Discover Conservation (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.