The observation of the Higgs boson solidified the standard model of particle physics. However, explanations of anomalies (for example, dark matter) rely on further symmetry breaking, calling for an undiscovered axial Higgs mode1. The Higgs mode was also seen in magnetic, superconducting and charge density wave (CDW) systems2,3. Uncovering the vector properties of a low-energy mode is challenging, and requires going beyond typical spectroscopic or scattering techniques. Here we discover an axial Higgs mode in the CDW system RTe3 using the interference of quantum pathways. In RTe3 (R = La, Gd), the electronic ordering couples bands of equal or different angular momenta4,5,6. As such, the Raman scattering tensor associated with the Higgs mode contains both symmetric and antisymmetric components, which are excited via two distinct but degenerate pathways. This leads to constructive or destructive interference of these pathways, depending on the choice of the incident and Raman-scattered light polarization. The qualitative behaviour of the Raman spectra is well captured by an appropriate tight-binding model, including an axial Higgs mode. Elucidation of the antisymmetric component is direct evidence that the Higgs mode contains an axial vector representation (that is, a pseudo-angular momentum) and hints that the CDW is unconventional. Thus, we provide a means for measuring quantum properties of collective modes without resorting to extreme experimental conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the OSF storage https://osf.io/87bxy/.
Franzosi, D. B., Cacciapaglia, G., Cai, H., Deandrea, A. & Frandsen, M. Vector and axial-vector resonances in composite models of the Higgs boson. J. High Energy Phys. 2016, 76 (2016).
Shimano, R. & Tsuji, N. Higgs mode in superconductors. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 103–124 (2020).
Pekker, D. & Varma, C. Amplitude/Higgs modes in condensed matter physics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 269–297 (2015).
Klemenz, S. et al. The role of delocalized chemical bonding in square-net-based topological semimetals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6350–6359 (2020).
Brouet, V. et al. Angle-resolved photoemission study of the evolution of band structure and charge density wave properties in RTe3 (R = Y, La, Ce, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy). Phys. Rev. B 77, 235104 (2008).
Lei, S. et al. High mobility in a van der Waals layered antiferromagnetic metal. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6407 (2020).
Podolsky, D., Auerbach, A. & Arovas, D. P. Visibility of the amplitude (Higgs) mode in condensed matter. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174522 (2011).
Zeilinger, A., Gähler, R., Shull, C. G., Treimer, W. & Mampe, W. Single- and double-slit diffraction of neutrons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1067–1073 (1988).
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201–204 (2005).
Qu, D.-X., Hor, Y. S., Xiong, J., Cava, R. J. & Ong, N. P. Quantum oscillations and Hall anomaly of surface states in the topological insulator Bi2Te3. Science 329, 821–824 (2010).
Ryu, C., Samson, E. C. & Boshier, M. G. Quantum interference of currents in an atomtronic SQUID. Nat. Commun. 11, 3338 (2020).
Cleuziou, J.-P., Wernsdorfer, W., Bouchiat, V., Ondarçuhu, T. & Monthioux, M. Carbon nanotube superconducting quantum interference device. Nat. Nanotechnol. 1, 53–59 (2006).
Giazotto, F., Peltonen, J. T., Meschke, M. & Pekola, J. P. Superconducting quantum interference proximity transistor. Nat. Phys. 6, 254–259 (2010).
Mittal, S., Orre, V. V., Goldschmidt, E. A. & Hafezi, M. Tunable quantum interference using a topological source of indistinguishable photon pairs. Nat. Photonics 15, 542–548 (2021).
Wall, S. et al. Quantum interference between charge excitation paths in a solid-state Mott insulator. Nat. Phys. 7, 114–118 (2011).
Barik, S. et al. A topological quantum optics interface. Science 359, 666–668 (2018).
Popescu, S. Dynamical quantum non-locality. Nat. Phys. 6, 151–153 (2010).
Chang, J. et al. Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67. Nat. Phys. 8, 871–876 (2012).
Lavagnini, M. et al. Raman scattering evidence for a cascade evolution of the charge-density-wave collective amplitude mode. Phys. Rev. B 81, 081101 (2010).
Kogar, A. et al. Light-induced charge density wave in LaTe3. Nat. Phys. 16, 159–163 (2020).
Yusupov, R. V., Mertelj, T., Chu, J.-H., Fisher, I. R. & Mihailovic, D. Single-particle and collective mode couplings associated with 1- and 2-directional electronic ordering in metallic RTe3 (R = Ho, Dy, Tb). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 246402 (2008).
Liu, H. Y. et al. Possible observation of parametrically amplified coherent phasons in K0.3MoO3 using time-resolved extreme-ultraviolet angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 88, 045104 (2013).
Zocco, D. A. et al. Pressure dependence of the charge-density-wave and superconducting states in GdTe3,TbTe3, and DyTe3. Phys. Rev. B 91, 205114 (2015).
Xi, X. et al. Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer NbSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 765–769 (2015).
Yoshikawa, N. et al. Ultrafast switching to an insulating-like metastable state by amplitudon excitation of a charge density wave. Nat. Phys. 17, 909–914 (2021).
Mohammadzadeh, A. et al. Room temperature depinning of the charge-density waves in quasi-two-dimensional 1T-TaS2 devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 223101 (2021).
Klein, M. V. Theory of Raman scattering from charge-density-wave phonons. Phys. Rev. B 25, 7192–7208 (1982).
Wang, Y. et al. The range of non-Kitaev terms and fractional particles in α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 14 (2020).
Devereaux, T. P. & Hackl, R. Inelastic light scattering from correlated electrons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 175–233 (2007).
Cardona, M. Light Scattering in Solids 1 (Springer, 1975).
Koningstein, J. A. & Mortensen, O. S. Electronic Raman spectra IV: relation between the scattering tensor and the symmetry of the crystal field. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1208 (1968).
Chen, C.-F. et al. Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene. Nature 471, 617–620 (2011).
Rivera, P. et al. Observation of long-lived interlayer excitons in monolayer MoSe2-WSe2 heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 6, 6242 (2015).
Friedman, J. & Hochstrasser, R. M. Interference effects in resonance Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 32, 414–419 (1975).
Chen, C., Yin, Y.-Y. & Elliott, D. S. Interference between optical transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 507–510 (1990).
Eiter, H.-M. et al. Alternative route to charge density wave formation in multiband systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 64–69 (2013).
Gray, M. J. et al. A cleanroom in a glovebox. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 073909 (2020).
Tian, Y. et al. Low vibration high numerical aperture automated variable temperature Raman microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 043105 (2016).
Maschek, M. et al. Competing soft phonon modes at the charge-density-wave transitions in DyTe3. Phys. Rev. B 98, 094304 (2018).
Powell, R. C. Symmetry, Group Theory, and the Physical Properties of Crystals Vol. 824 (Springer, 2010).
We thank L. Benfatto and A. Chubukov for useful discussions about the CDW Raman response. Y.W. is grateful for the support of the Office of Naval Research under award number N00014-20-1-2308. K.S.B. and L.M.S. acknowledge joint support by the Air Force office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-20-1-0246. The work of G.M. was supported by the National Science Foundation via award DMR-2003343. M.M.H. acknowledges the primary support of the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under award number DE-SC0018675. L.M.S. acknowledges support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (EPiQS Synthesis Award) through grant GBMF9064, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Sloan Foundation. J.J.C. and J.L.H. gratefully acknowledge support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (EPiQS Synthesis Award). Y.-C.W. and J.Y. are supported by the National Science Foundation under award number DMR-2004474. Work by D.X. is supported by DOE award number DE-SC0012509. I.P. and P.N. are primarily supported by the Quantum Science Center (QSC), a National Quantum Information Science Research Center of the US DOE. Theory by I.P. and P.N. is supported by the QSC. I.P. was partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under project ID P2EZP2_199848. P.N. is a Moore Inventor Fellow and gratefully acknowledges partial support through grant GBMF8048 from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks Marie Aude Measson, Tommaso Cea and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Petrides, I., McNamara, G. et al. Axial Higgs mode detected by quantum pathway interference in RTe3. Nature 606, 896–901 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04746-6