Abstract
At the liquid–gas phase transition in water, the density has a discontinuity at atmospheric pressure; however, the line of these first-order transitions defined by increasing the applied pressure terminates at the critical point1, a concept ubiquitous in statistical thermodynamics2. In correlated quantum materials, it was predicted3 and then confirmed experimentally4,5 that a critical point terminates the line of Mott metal–insulator transitions, which are also first-order with a discontinuous charge carrier density. In quantum spin systems, continuous quantum phase transitions6 have been controlled by pressure7,8, applied magnetic field9,10 and disorder11, but discontinuous quantum phase transitions have received less attention. The geometrically frustrated quantum antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2 constitutes a near-exact realization of the paradigmatic Shastry–Sutherland model12,13,14 and displays exotic phenomena including magnetization plateaus15, low-lying bound-state excitations16, anomalous thermodynamics17 and discontinuous quantum phase transitions18,19. Here we control both the pressure and the magnetic field applied to SrCu2(BO3)2 to provide evidence of critical-point physics in a pure spin system. We use high-precision specific-heat measurements to demonstrate that, as in water, the pressure–temperature phase diagram has a first-order transition line that separates phases with different local magnetic energy densities, and that terminates at an Ising critical point. We provide a quantitative explanation of our data using recently developed finite-temperature tensor-network methods17,20,21,22. These results further our understanding of first-order quantum phase transitions in quantum magnetism, with potential applications in materials where anisotropic spin interactions produce the topological properties23,24 that are useful for spintronic applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4455613 and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Cagniard de la Tour, C. Exposé de quelques résultats obtenus par l’action combinée de la chaleur et de la compression sur certains liquides, tels que l’eau, l’alcool, l’éther sulfurique et l’essence de pétrole rectifié. Ann. Chim Phys. 21, 127–132 (1822).
Chaikin, P. M. & Lubensky, T. C. Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).
Georges, A., Kotliar, G., Krauth, W. & Rozenberg, M. J. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13–125 (1996).
Limelette, P. et al. Universality and critical behavior at the Mott transition. Science 302, 89–92 (2003).
Kagawa, F., Miyagawa, K. & Kanoda, K. Unconventional critical behaviour in a quasi-two-dimensional organic conductor. Nature 436, 534–537 (2005).
Sachdev, S. Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
Rüegg, C. et al. Quantum magnets under pressure: controlling elementary excitations in TlCuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 205701 (2008).
Merchant, P. et al. Quantum and classical criticality in a dimerized quantum antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 10, 373–379 (2014).
Giamarchi, T., Rüegg, C. & Tchernyshyov, O. Bose–Einstein condensation in magnetic insulators. Nat. Phys. 4, 198–204 (2008).
Thielemann, B. et al. Direct observation of magnon fractionalization in a quantum spin ladder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107204 (2009).
Yu, R. et al. Bose glass and Mott glass of quasiparticles in a doped quantum magnet. Nature 489, 379–384 (2012).
Shastry, B. S. & Sutherland, B. Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet. Physica B+C 108, 1069–1070 (1981).
Miyahara, S. & Ueda, K. Theory of the orthogonal dimer Heisenberg spin model for SrCu2(BO3)2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 327–366 (2003).
Corboz, P. & Mila, F. Tensor network study of the Shastry–Sutherland model in zero magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115144 (2013).
Matsuda, Y. H. et al. Magnetization of SrCu2(BO3)2 in ultrahigh magnetic fields up to 118 T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137204 (2013).
Knetter, C., Bühler, A., Müller-Hartmann, E. & Uhrig, G. S. Dispersion and symmetry of bound states in the Shastry–Sutherland model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3958–3961 (2000).
Wietek, A. et al. Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry–Sutherland model throughout the dimer-product phase. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033038 (2019).
Zayed, M. E. et al. 4-spin plaquette singlet state in the Shastry–Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2. Nat. Phys. 13, 962–966 (2017).
Guo, J. et al. Quantum phases of SrCu2(BO3)2 from high-pressure thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 206602 (2020).
Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0407066 (2004).
Jordan, J., Orús, R., Vidal, G., Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008).
Czarnik, P., Dziarmaga, J. & Corboz, P. Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: an efficient algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 99, 035115 (2019).
Witczak-Krempa, W., Chen, G., Kim, Y.-B. & Balents, L. Correlated quantum phenomena in the strong spin–orbit regime. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 57–82 (2014).
Chacon, A. et al. Observation of two independent skyrmion phases in a chiral magnetic material. Nat. Phys. 14, 936–941 (2018).
Wagner, W. et al. The IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam. J. Eng. Gas Turbine. Power 122, 150–184 (2000).
Orlov, K. A., Alexandrov, A. A., Ochkov, A. V. & Ochkov, V. F. WaterSteamPro documentation www.wsp.ru (2021).
Stapmanns, J. et al. Thermal critical points and quantum critical end point in the frustrated bilayer Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 127201 (2018).
Kageyama, H. et al. Exact dimer ground state and quantized magnetization plateaus in the two-dimensional spin system SrCu2(BO3)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3168–3171 (1999).
Larrea J, J., Martelli, V. & Rønnow, H. M. High-pressure specific heat technique to uncover novel states of quantum matter. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1609, 012008 (2020).
Boos, C. et al. Competition between intermediate plaquette phases in SrCu2(BO3)2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 140413 (2019).
Nojiri, H., Kageyama, H., Onizuka, K., Ueda, Y. & Motokawa, M. Direct observation of the multiple spin gap excitations in two-dimensional dimer system SrCu2(BO3)2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 2906–2909 (1999).
Fisher, M. E. & Upton, P. J. Universality and interfaces at critical end points. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2402 (1990).
Fisher, M. E. & Barbosa, M. C. Phase boundaries near critical end points. I. Thermodynamics and universality. Phys. Rev. B 43, 11177–11184 (1991).
Bettler, S., Stoppel, L., Yan, Z., Gvasaliya, S. & Zhedulev, Z. Competition between intermediate plaquette phases in SrCu2(BO3)2. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012010 (2020).
Lee, J. Y., You, Y.-Z., Sachdev, S. & Vishwanath, A. Signatures of a deconfined phase transition on the Shastry–Sutherland lattice: applications to quantum critical SrCu2(BO3)2. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041037 (2019).
Waki, T. et al. A novel ordered phase in SrCu2(BO3)2 under high pressure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 073710 (2007).
Maxim, F. et al. Visualization of supercritical water pseudo-boiling at Widom line crossover. Nat. Commun. 10, 4114 (2019).
Sordi, G., Haule, K. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. Finite doping signatures of the Mott transition in the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 226402 (2010).
Terletska, H., Vučičević, J., Tanasković, D. & Dobrosavljević, V. Quantum critical transport near the Mott transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 026401 (2011).
Eisenlohr, H., Lee, S.-S. B. & Vojta, M. Mott quantum criticality in the one-band Hubbard model: dynamical mean-field theory, power-law spectra, and scaling. Phys. Rev. B 100, 155152 (2019).
Furukawa, T., Miyagawa, K., Taniguchi, H., Kato, R. & Kanoda, K. Quantum criticality of Mott transition in organic materials. Nat. Phys. 11, 221–224 (2015).
Kageyama, H., Onizuka, K., Yamauchi, T. & Ueda, Y. Crystal growth of the two-dimensional spin gap system SrCu3(BO2)2. J. Cryst. Growth 206, 65–67 (1999).
Jorge, G. A. et al. High magnetic field magnetization and specific heat of the 2D spin–dimer system SrCu2(BO3)2. J. Alloys Compd. 369, 90–92 (2004).
Gmelin, E. Classical temperature-modulated calorimetry: a review. Thermochim. Acta 304–305, 1–26 (1997).
Wessel, S. et al. Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry–Sutherland model from quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. B 98, 174432 (2018).
Nishio, Y., Maeshima, N., Gendiar, A. & Nishino, T. Tensor product variational formulation for quantum systems. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401115 (2004).
Li, W. et al. Linearized tensor renormalization group algorithm for the calculation of thermodynamic properties of quantum lattice models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127202 (2011).
Czarnik, P., Cincio, L. & Dziarmaga, J. Projected entangled pair states at finite temperature: imaginary time evolution with ancillas. Phys. Rev. B 86, 245101 (2012).
Czarnik, P. & Dziarmaga, J. Projected entangled pair states at finite temperature: iterative self-consistent bond renormalization for exact imaginary time evolution. Phys. Rev. B 92, 035120 (2015).
Kshetrimayum, A., Rizzi, M., Eisert, J. & Orús, R. Tensor network annealing algorithm for two-dimensional thermal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 070502 (2019).
Jiang, H. C., Weng, Z. Y. & Xiang, T. Accurate determination of tensor network state of quantum lattice models in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008).
Singh, S., Pfeifer, R. N. C. & Vidal, G. Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global U(1) symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115125 (2011).
Bauer, B., Corboz, P., Orús, R. & Troyer, M. Implementing global Abelian symmetries in projected entangled-pair state algorithms. Phys. Rev. B 83, 125106 (2011).
Corboz, P., Rice, T. M. & Troyer, M. Competing states in the t–J model: uniform d-wave state versus stripe state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046402 (2014).
Nishino, T. & Okunishi, K. Corner transfer matrix renormalization group method. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891–894 (1996).
Orús, R. & Vidal, G. Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction. Phys. Rev. B 80, 094403 (2009).
Luo, J., Xu, L., Stanley, H. E. & Buldyrev, S. V. Behavior of the Widom line in critical phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 135701 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to R. Gaal, J. Piatek and M. de Vries for technical assistance. We acknowledge discussions with D. Badrtdinov, C. Boos, T. Fennell, A. Sandvik, A.-M. Tremblay, A. Turrini, A. Wietek and A. Zheludev. We thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support under grant no. 2018/08845-3, the Qatar Foundation for support through Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar’s Seed Research programme, the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for support under grant no. 188648 and the European Research Council (ERC) for support under the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 677061), as well as from the ERC Synergy Grant HERO. We are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for the support of RTG 1995 and to the IT Center at RWTH Aachen University and the JSC Jülich for access to computing time through JARA-HPC. The statements made herein are not the responsibility of the Qatar Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The experimental project was conceived by H.M.R. and Ch.R. and the theoretical framework was put forward by F.M. The crystals were grown by E.P. and K.C. Specific-heat measurements were performed by J.L.J. with assistance from M.E.Z., R.L. and H.M.R. S.P.G.C. and P.C. performed iPEPS calculations. A.M.L. performed complementary exact diagonalization calculations. L.W. and S.W. performed quantum Monte Carlo simulations on the fully frustrated bilayer model. Data analysis and figure preparation were performed by J.L.J., E.F., S.P.G.C., L.W., S.W., P.C. and H.M.R. The detailed theoretical analysis was provided by P.C., S.P.G.C., F.M., A.H., B.N., L.W. and S.W. The manuscript was written by B.N. and F.M. with assistance from all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature thanks Jong Yeon Lee and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 a.c. calorimetry on SrCu2(BO3)2.
a, The a.c. calorimeter was prepared by depositing two Pt thin films (the shinier surfaces) over both halves of the sample. One film was used as the heater and the other for optimal thermal contact and measurement. The heating current (Iex at frequency f) was supplied through the pair of Constantan wires labelled H1a and H1b, and H2a and H2b were used to measure the electrical resistance, RPt, of the Pt film. TC1 and TC2 are thermocouples and K represents the thermal contact between the sample and the cryostat (through the pressure cell). b, Isothermal (T = 4.5 K) and isobaric (P = 20 kbar) f dependence of the modulated pick-up voltage, Vac, which is directly proportional to the temperature differential, ΔTac, measured by the thermocouples at two different positions. c, Isobaric (P = 18.2 kbar) f-dependence measurements of Vac at different temperatures with I0 = 1.6 mA at T ≥ 3.9 K, I0 = 0.8 mA at T = 2 K and I0 = 0.4 mA at T < 2 K. d, Sample heat capacity normalized to the input heating power (\({P}_{0}={I}_{0}^{2}{R}_{{\rm{Pt}}}\)), comparing the fit of Vac(f) obtained from the steady-state equation (‘f scan’)29 with values obtained directly from a variable-temperature measurement performed at the fixed working frequency fC = 1.5 Hz (‘T scan’). Solid and dashed lines in b and c represent fits using the steady-state equation29,44.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Correlation length.
ξ/a for the Shastry–Sutherland model, calculated by iPEPS with D = 8 as a function of the coupling ratio, J/JD, at a fixed temperature Tc(D = 8) = 0.0522JD/kB. The three panels show increasing magnification of the J/JD axis from the equivalent of Fig. 1 (upper right) through the step sizes of Fig. 2c, d (10−3J/JD, centre) to 10−5J/JD (lower left).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Critical point in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions.
Thermodynamic data obtained from iPEPS calculations with D = 10 performed for the Shastry–Sutherland model in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions. These interactions, of strength DD, are placed on the dimer (JD) bonds and have the magnitude known for SrCu2(BO3)2. They create an entangled ground state in the dimer phase, which resolves the numerical instabilities observed for the pure Shastry–Sutherland model at low temperatures, although the reduced symmetry limits the maximum D to 10. a, Specific heat, C( J/JD, T)/T, shown in the same format as for Fig. 1b, c. b, Correlation length, ξ/a, showing clearly the region of ‘pressure’ and temperature over which Ising correlations develop. c, Dimer spin–spin correlation function, ⟨Si · Sj⟩, emphasizing the abrupt onset with decreasing temperature of a sharp discontinuity as a function of J/JD. It is clear that these Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions have no qualitative effect whatsoever on the physics of the critical point.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Ising critical points in different lattice models.
Specific heat, C/T, for a number of 2D models, illustrating its universal behaviour around the Ising critical point. a, Ising model on the square lattice in a longitudinal magnetic field, h, obtained by contracting the exact D = 2 tensor-network representation of the partition function using the corner-transfer-matrix method with a boundary bond dimension χ = 24 (ref. 55). b, Fully frustrated bilayer model, obtained by using the stochastic series expansion quantum Monte Carlo approach developed in refs. 27,45 to perform simulations on systems of sizes up to 2 × 32 × 32 as a function of J⟂/J∥. c, Shastry–Sutherland model, obtained by iPEPS calculations with D = 20 as in Fig. 1c. The dashed lines show the positions of the local maxima of the specific heat, C(J/JD), which we label by their temperatures, Tmax. These two lines reach an absolute minimum, Tmax = Tc, where they meet at the Ising critical point, with Tmax increasing as the control parameter is changed away from the QPT. Thus the specific heat defines two characteristic lines in the phase diagram of the Ising critical point, instead of the single line given by the correlation length (Fig. 1d) and the critical isochore (Fig. 1e). This contrasting behaviour has been demonstrated in models where the critical pressure is temperature-independent57 and the issue of characteristic lines has also been discussed in the Mott metal–insulator phase diagram38,40. We stress that such behaviour is a fundamental property of the Ising model, and hence of all models sharing its physics. For the Shastry–Sutherland model (c), the two lines of maxima can be taken to provide a qualitative definition of regimes dominated by ‘dimer-like’ spin correlations (lower left) and by ‘plaquette-like’ correlations (lower right, but above the plaquette-ordered phase), accompanied by a third regime (above both lines) bearing no clear hallmarks of either T = 0 phase. We remark that the values of Tc in units of the relevant energy scale, Tc/J ≈ 2.3 (a), Tc/J ≈ 0.53 (b) and Tc/J ≈ 0.04 (c), vary widely among the three models. This can be traced to the change in slope of the ground-state energy at the transition, the compensation of which by entropy effects restores a derivable free energy at Tc.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiménez, J.L., Crone, S.P.G., Fogh, E. et al. A quantum magnetic analogue to the critical point of water. Nature 592, 370–375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03411-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03411-8
This article is cited by
-
Field-induced bound-state condensation and spin-nematic phase in SrCu2(BO3)2 revealed by neutron scattering up to 25.9 T
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Field-controlled multicritical behavior and emergent universality in fully frustrated quantum magnets
npj Quantum Materials (2024)
-
Unveiling new quantum phases in the Shastry-Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2 up to the saturation magnetic field
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Discovery of quantum phases in the Shastry-Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2 under extreme conditions of field and pressure
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Thermally populated versus field-induced triplon bound states in the Shastry-Sutherland lattice SrCu2(BO3)2
npj Quantum Materials (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.