Abstract
Observations suggest that mature faults host large earthquakes at much lower levels of stress than their expected static strength1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Potential explanations are that the faults are quasi-statically strong but experience considerable weakening during earthquakes, or that the faults are persistently weak, for example, because of fluid overpressure. Here we use numerical modelling to examine these competing theories for simulated earthquake ruptures that satisfy the well known observations of 1–10 megapascal stress drops and limited heat production. In that regime, quasi-statically strong but dynamically weak faults mainly host relatively sharp, self-healing pulse-like ruptures, with only a small portion of the fault slipping at a given time, whereas persistently weak faults host milder ruptures with more spread-out slip, which are called crack-like ruptures. We find that the sharper self-healing pulses, which exhibit larger dynamic stress changes compared to their static stress changes, result in much larger radiated energy than that inferred teleseismically for megathrust events12. By contrast, milder crack-like ruptures on persistently weak faults, which produce comparable static and dynamic stress changes, are consistent with the seismological observations. The larger radiated energy of self-healing pulses is similar to the limited regional inferences available for crustal strike-slip faults. Our findings suggest that either large earthquakes rarely propagate as self-healing pulses, with potential differences between tectonic settings, or their radiated energy is substantially underestimated, raising questions about earthquake physics and the expected shaking from large earthquakes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Numerical data are accessible through the CaltechDATA repository (https://data.caltech.edu/records/1620). Seismological inferences used in this study are compiled from published literature and publicly available sources. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The numerical methodology used in this study is described in the Supplementary Materials and references32,49.
References
Brune, J. N., Henyey, T. L. & Roy, R. F. Heat flow, stress, and rate of slip along the San Andreas Fault, California. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 3821–3827 (1969).
Henyey, T. L. & Wasserburg, G. J. Heat flow near major strike-slip faults in California. J. Geophys. Res. (1896–1977) 76, 7924–7946 (1971).
Sibson, R. H. Generation of pseudotachylyte by ancient seismic faulting. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 43, 775–794 (1975).
Lachenbruch, A. H. & Sass, J. H. Heat flow and energetics of the San Andreas Fault Zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 85, 6185–6222 (1980).
Townend, J. & Zoback, M. D. Regional tectonic stress near the San Andreas fault in central and Southern California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L15S11 (2004).
Rice, J. R. Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05311 (2006).
Suppe, J. Absolute fault and crustal strength from wedge tapers. Geology 35, 1127–1130 (2007).
Tanikawa, W. & Shimamoto, T. Frictional and transport properties of the Chelungpu fault from shallow borehole data and their correlation with seismic behavior during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B01402 (2009).
Nankali, H. R. Slip rate of the Kazerun fault and Main Recent fault (Zagros, Iran) from 3D mechanical modeling. J. Asian Earth Sci. 41, 89–98 (2011).
Fulton, P. M. et al. Low coseismic friction on the Tohoku-Oki fault determined from temperature measurements. Science 342, 1214–1217 (2013).
Gao, X. & Wang, K. Strength of stick-slip and creeping subduction megathrusts from heat flow observations. Science 345, 1038–1041 (2014).
Ye, L., Lay, T., Kanamori, H. & Rivera, L. Rupture characteristics of major and great (Mw > 7.0) megathrust earthquakes from 1990 to 2015: 2. Depth dependence. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 845–863 (2016).
Chester, F. M. & Chester, J. S. Ultracataclasite structure and friction processes of the Punchbowl fault, San Andreas system, California. Tectonophysics 295, 199–221 (1998).
Wibberley, C. A. & Shimamoto, T. Earthquake slip weakening and asperities explained by thermal pressurization. Nature 436, 689–692 (2005).
Tullis, T. in Treatise on Geophysics Vol. 4 (ed. Schubert, G.) 131–152 (2007).
Di Toro, G. et al. Fault lubrication during earthquakes. Nature 471, 494–498 (2011).
Brown, K., Kopf, A., Underwood, M. & Weinberger, J. Compositional and fluid pressure controls on the state of stress on the Nankai subduction thrust: a weak plate boundary. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 214, 589–603 (2003).
Faulkner, D. R., Mitchell, T. M., Healy, D. & Heap, M. J. Slip on ‘weak’ faults by the rotation of regional stress in the fracture damage zone. Nature 444, 922–925 (2006).
Bangs, N. et al. Broad, weak regions of the Nankai Megathrust and implications for shallow coseismic slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 284, 44–49 (2009).
Collettini, C., Niemeijer, A., Viti, C. & Marone, C. Fault zone fabric and fault weakness. Nature 462, 907–910 (2009).
Lockner, D. A., Morrow, C., Moore, D. & Hickman, S. Low strength of deep San Andreas fault gouge from SAFOD core. Nature 472, 82–85 (2011).
Heaton, T. H. Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 64, 1–20 (1990).
Noda, H., Dunham, E. M. & Rice, J. R. Earthquake ruptures with thermal weakening and the operation of major faults at low overall stress levels. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B07302 (2009).
Allmann, B. P. & Shearer, P. M. Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B01310 (2009).
Ide, S. & Beroza, G. C. Does apparent stress vary with earthquake size? Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 3349–3352 (2001).
Abercrombie, R. E. & Rice, J. R. Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening? Geophys. J. Int. 162, 406–424 (2005).
Viesca, R. C. & Garagash, D. I. Ubiquitous weakening of faults due to thermal pressurization. Nat. Geosci. 8, 875–879 (2015).
Perry, S. M., Lambert, V. & Lapusta, N. Nearly magnitude-invariant stress drops in simulated crack-like earthquake sequences on rate-and-state faults with thermal pressurization of pore fluids. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 125, e2019JB018597 (2020).
Beeler, N. M., Wong, T. F. & Hickman, S. H. On the expected relationships among apparent stress, static stress drop, effective shear fracture energy, and efficiency. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1381–1389 (2003).
Kanamori, H. & Rivera, L. in Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting (eds Abercrombie, R. et al.) 3–13 (AGU, 2006).
Madariaga, R. Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 66, 639–666 (1976).
Noda, H. & Lapusta, N. Three-dimensional earthquake sequence simulations with evolving temperature and pore pressure due to shear heating: effect of heterogeneous hydraulic diffusivity. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B12314 (2010).
Dieterich, J. in Treatise on Geophysics (ed. Schubert, G.) 107–129 (Elsevier, 2007).
Andrews, D. J. Rupture models with dynamically determined breakdown displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 769–775 (2004).
Noda, H. & Lapusta, N. On averaging interface response during dynamic rupture and energy partitioning diagrams for earthquakes. J. Appl. Mech. 79, 031026 (2012).
Choy, G. L. & Boatwright, J. L. Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apparent stress. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 100, 18205–18228 (1995).
Pérez-Campos, X. & Beroza, G. C. An apparent mechanism dependence of radiated seismic energy. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 106, 11127–11136 (2001).
Ma, S. & Archuleta, R. J. Radiated seismic energy based on dynamic rupture models of faulting. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004055 (2006).
Perrin, G., Rice, J. R. & Zheng, G. Self-healing slip pulse on a frictional surface. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43, 1461–1495 (1995).
Day, S. M. Three-dimensional finite difference simulation of fault dynamics: rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 705–727 (1982).
Beroza, G. C. & Mikumo, T. Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 101, 22449–22460 (1996).
Andrews, D. J. & Ben-Zion, Y. Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different materials. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 102, 553–571 (1997).
Kanamori, H. & Brodsky, E. E. The physics of earthquakes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1429–1496 (2004).
Cocco, M., Bizzarri, A. & Tinti, E. Physical interpretation of the breakdown process using a rate-and state-dependent friction law. Tectonophysics 378, 241–262 (2004).
Savage, J. C. & Wood, M. D. The relation between apparent stress and stress drop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 61, 1381–1388 (1971).
Rice, J. R., Sammis, C. G. & Parsons, R. Off-fault secondary failure induced by a dynamic slip pulse. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 109–134 (2005).
Jiang, J. & Lapusta, N. Deeper penetration of large earthquakes on seismically quiescent faults. Science 352, 1293–1297 (2016).
Kanamori, H., Ross, Z. E. & Rivera, L. Estimation of radiated energy using the KiK-net downhole records—old method for modern data. Geophys. J. Int. 221, 1029–1042 (2020).
Lapusta, N., Rice, J. R., Ben-Zion, Y. & Zheng, G. Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state- dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23765–23789 (2000).
Dieterich, J. H. Modeling of rock friction 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2161–2168 (1979).
Ruina, A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 10359–10370 (1983).
Noda, H. Frictional constitutive law at intermediate slip rates accounting for flash heating and thermally activated slip process. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, B09302 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) (grants EAR 1142183 and 1520907), the US Geological Survey (grant G19AP00059) and the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), contribution no. 10085. SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR 1033462 and US Geological Survey Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. Numerical simulations for this study were carried out on the High Performance Computing Center cluster of the California Institute of Technology. We thank H. Kanamori, T. Heaton, J.-P. Avouac, V. Tsai and Z. Zhan for discussions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.L and N.L contributed to developing the main ideas, interpreting the results and producing the manuscript. S.P. performed preliminary simulations comparing crack-like ruptures and self-healing pulses. V.L. designed, carried out and analysed the numerical experiments described in the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature thanks Jeffrey J. McGuire, Peter Shearer and Alice-Agnes Gabriel for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Text, Supplementary Figures 1–23, Supplementary Tables 1–6, legends for Supplementary Videos 1–3, and Supplementary References.
Supplementary Video 1
Evolution of shear stress during a self-healing pulse-like rupture on a quasi-statically strong but dynamically weak fault. Evolution of shear stress (black line) along the fault during a self-healing pulse-like rupture on a quasi-statically strong but dynamically weak fault (H1). The video illustrates the changes in shear stress with respect to the initial (grey) and final (blue) shear stresses, as well as the quasi-static strength (red). The initial stress on the majority of the fault is far below the quasi-static strength, except for the region in which the rupture nucleates, which is small compared to the total rupture area. As the rupture front crosses the seismogenic (VW) region, each point experiences a large dynamic stress increase towards ~100 MPa and then drops to low levels below 10 MPa. Only a small portion of the fault slips at a given time as the shear resistance heals behind the rupture front and the fault relocks, resulting in higher final stress levels than the level of shear resistance at which most of the slip occurred.
Supplementary Video 2
Evolution of shear stress during a crack-like rupture on a persistently weak fault. Evolution of shear stress (black line) along the fault during a mild crack-like rupture on a persistently weak fault (H2). The initial shear stress over the entire rupture region is within 1–2 times the static stress drop (7.3 MPa) away from the quasi-static strength. Slip continues within the regions behind the rupture front until the rupture front is arrested in the VS region on the other side of the seismogenic (VW) region, and healing waves redistribute stress and arrest slip. All conventions follow Supplementary Video 1.
Supplementary Video 3
Scaled evolution of shear stress during a crack-like rupture rupture on a persistently weak fault. Evolution of shear stress (black line) along the fault for the same mild crack-like rupture as shown in Supplementary Video 2, however with the shear stress axis rescaled to emphasize the dynamic stress changes during the rupture. Slip continues within the regions behind the rupture front until the rupture front is arrested in the VS region on the other side of the seismogenic (VW) region, and healing waves redistribute stress and arrest slip, resulting in a dynamic overshoot throughout most of the ruptured region. All conventions follow Supplementary Videos 1 and 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambert, V., Lapusta, N. & Perry, S. Propagation of large earthquakes as self-healing pulses or mild cracks. Nature 591, 252–258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03248-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03248-1
This article is cited by
-
Fault strength and rupture process controlled by fault surface topography
Nature Geoscience (2023)
-
Characterization and Correlation of Rock Fracture-Induced Electrical Resistance and Acoustic Emission
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (2023)
-
Earthquake breakdown energy scaling despite constant fracture energy
Nature Communications (2022)
-
A multi-disciplinary view on earthquake science
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.