Metabolic trait diversity shapes marine biogeography


Climate and physiology shape biogeography, yet the range limits of species can rarely be ascribed to the quantitative traits of organisms1,2,3. Here we evaluate whether the geographical range boundaries of species coincide with ecophysiological limits to acquisition of aerobic energy4 for a global cross-section of the biodiversity of marine animals. We observe a tight correlation between the metabolic rate and the efficacy of oxygen supply, and between the temperature sensitivities of these traits, which suggests that marine animals are under strong selection for the tolerance of low O2 (hypoxia)5. The breadth of the resulting physiological tolerances of marine animals predicts a variety of geographical niches—from the tropics to high latitudes and from shallow to deep water—which better align with species distributions than do models based on either temperature or oxygen alone. For all studied species, thermal and hypoxic limits are substantially reduced by the energetic demands of ecological activity, a trait that varies similarly among marine and terrestrial taxa. Active temperature-dependent hypoxia thus links the biogeography of diverse marine species to fundamental energetic requirements that are shared across the animal kingdom.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Relationships among species traits that govern the temperature-dependent vulnerability to hypoxia of marine animals.
Fig. 2: Spatial distributions of the Metabolic Index and species with distinct temperature sensitivities.
Fig. 3: Temperature and \({{\boldsymbol{p}}}_{{{\bf{O}}}_{{\bf{2}}}}\) state-space habitat for three marine species from different phyla, ocean basins and latitude ranges.
Fig. 4: Diversity of the ecological trait governing energetic habitat barriers.
Fig. 5: Thermal tolerance of species measured in laboratory studies (CTmax) and predicted from the Metabolic Index (ATmax).

Data availability

The data used in this study are described in the Methods. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The MATLAB code is available at GitHub (


  1. 1.

    Violle, C., Reich, P. B., Pacala, S. W., Enquist, B. J. & Kattge, J. The emergence and promise of functional biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13690–13696 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Angilletta, M. J. Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Global analysis of thermal tolerance and latitude in ectotherms. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1823–1830 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Deutsch, C., Ferrel, A., Seibel, B., Pörtner, H.-O. & Huey, R. B. Ecophysiology. Climate change tightens a metabolic constraint on marine habitats. Science 348, 1132–1135 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mandic, M., Todgham, A. E. & Richards, J. G. Mechanisms and evolution of hypoxia tolerance in fish. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 735–744 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Seibel, B. A. & Drazen, J. C. The rate of metabolism in marine animals: environmental constraints, ecological demands and energetic opportunities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 362, 2061–2078 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brey, T. An empirical model for estimating aquatic invertebrate respiration. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 92–101 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Peterson, C. C., Nagy, K. A. & Diamond, J. Sustained metabolic scope. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 2324–2328 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hammond, K. A. & Diamond, J. Maximal sustained energy budgets in humans and animals. Nature 386, 457–462 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fry, F. E. J. Effect of the environment on animal activity. Univ. Tor. Stud. Biol. Ser. 55, 1–62 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Brett, J. R. Energetic responses of salmon to temperature. A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Am. Zool. 11, 99–113 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pörtner, H.-O. & Farrell, A. P. Physiology and climate change. Science 322, 690–692 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Piiper, J., Dejours, P., Haab, P. & Rahn, H. Concepts and basic quantities in gas exchange physiology. Respir. Physiol. 13, 292–304 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chan, F. et al. Emergence of anoxia in the California current large marine ecosystem. Science 319, 920 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926–929 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wishner, K. F. et al. Ocean deoxygenation and zooplankton: very small oxygen differences matter. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau5180 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Howard, E. M. et al. Climate-driven aerobic habitat loss in the California current system. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay3188 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nilsson, G. E. & Östlund-Nilsson, S. Does size matter for hypoxia tolerance in fish? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 83, 173–189 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    DeLong, J. P., Okie, J. G., Moses, M. E., Sibly, R. M. & Brown, J. H. Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary transitions of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12941–12945 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Deutsch, C., Brix, H., Ito, T., Frenzel, H. & Thompson, L. Climate-forced variability of ocean hypoxia. Science 333, 336–339 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dell, A. I., Pawar, S. & Savage, V. M. Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10591–10596 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Verberk, W. C. E. P., Bilton, D. T., Calosi, P. & Spicer, J. I. Oxygen supply in aquatic ectotherms: partial pressure and solubility together explain biodiversity and size patterns. Ecology 92, 1565–1572 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Emerson, S. & Hedges, J. Chemical Oceanography and the Marine Carbon Cycle (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).

  24. 24.

    Kristensen, E. Ventilation and oxygen uptake by three species of Nereis (Annelida: Polychaeta). II. Effects of temperature and salinity changes.  Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 12, 229–306 (1983).

  25. 25.

    Gehrke, P. C. Response surface analysis of teleost cardio-respiratory responses to temperature and dissolved oxygen. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 89, 587–592 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Spitzer, K. W., Marvin, D. E. Jr & Heath, A. G. The effect of temperature on the respiratory and cardiac response of the bluegill sunfish to hypoxia. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 30, 83–90 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kielland, Ø. N., Bech, C. & Einum, S. Warm and out of breath: thermal phenotypic plasticity in oxygen supply. Funct. Ecol. 33, 2142–2149 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chung, M.-T., Trueman, C. N., Godiksen, J. A., Holmstrup, M. E. & Grønkjær, P. Field metabolic rates of teleost fishes are recorded in otolith carbonate. Commun. Biol. 2, 24 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pörtner, H.-O. Oxygen- and capacity-limitation of thermal tolerance: a matrix for integrating climate-related stressor effects in marine ecosystems. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 881–893 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Verberk, W. C. E. P., Durance, I., Vaughan, I. P. & Ormerod, S. J. Field and laboratory studies reveal interacting effects of stream oxygenation and warming on aquatic ectotherms. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1769–1778 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Verberk, W. C. E. P., Leuven, R. S. E. W., van der Velde, G. & Gabel, F. Thermal limits in native and alien freshwater peracarid Crustacea: the role of habitat use and oxygen limitation. Funct. Ecol. 32, 926–936 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Verberk, W. C. E. P. et al. Does oxygen limit thermal tolerance in arthropods? A critical review of current evidence. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 192, 64–78 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lefevre, S. Are global warming and ocean acidification conspiring against marine ectotherms? A meta-analysis of the respiratory effects of elevated temperature, high CO2 and their interaction. Conserv. Physiol. 4, cow009 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jutfelt, F. et al. Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 221, jeb169615 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ern, R., Norin, T., Gamperl, A. K. & Esbaugh, A. J. Oxygen dependence of upper thermal limits in fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 3376–3383 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Deutsch, C. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668–6672 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sunday, J. M. et al. Thermal-safety margins and the necessity of thermoregulatory behavior across latitude and elevation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5610–5615 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rummer, J. L. et al. Life on the edge: thermal optima for aerobic scope of equatorial reef fishes are close to current day temperatures. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1055–1066 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Penn, J. L., Deutsch, C., Payne, J. L. & Sperling, E. A. Temperature-dependent hypoxia explains biogeography and severity of end-Permian marine mass extinction. Science 362, eaat1327 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Killen, S. S. et al. Ecological influences and morphological correlates of resting and maximal metabolic rates across teleost fish species. Am. Nat. 187, 592–606 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M. & Charnov, E. L. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293, 2248–2251 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Malte, H. & Weber, R. E. A mathematical model for gas exchange in the fish gill based on non-linear blood gas equilibrium curves. Respir. Physiol. 62, 359–374 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rogers, N. J., Urbina, M. A., Reardon, E. E., McKenzie, D. J. & Wilson, R. W. A new analysis of hypoxia tolerance in fishes using a database of critical oxygen level (P crit). Conserv. Physiol. 4, cow012 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2013. Volume 1: Temperature (National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013).

  46. 46.

    Garcia, H. E. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation (National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013).

  47. 47.

    Amante, C. & Eakins, B. W. ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24 (2009)

  48. 48.

    Shawe-Taylor, J. & Cristianini, N. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).

  49. 49.

    Liu, C., White, M. & Newell, G. Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data. Ecography 34, 232–243 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schurmann, H. & Steffensen, J. F. Effects of temperature, hypoxia and activity on the metabolism of juvenile Atlantic cod. J. Fish Biol. 50, 1166–1180 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Heath, A. G. & Hughes, G. M. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes during heat stress in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Exp. Biol. 59, 323–338 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank T. Brey for contributing data, E. Howard for statistical advice, H. Frenzel for computational support and W. Verberk, M. Pinsky and A. Bates for insightful suggestions that improved the clarity of presentation. This work was made possible by grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF#3775) and the National Science Foundation (OCE-1419323 and OCE-1458967) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA18NOS4780167).

Author information




C.D and J.L.P. analysed the data and wrote the paper with input from B.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis Deutsch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Amanda Bates, Malin Pinsky and Wilco C. E. P. Verberk for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Species metabolic rates and hypoxia tolerances from laboratory studies.

a, b, Measured metabolic rates (μmol g−1 h−1) (a) and critical O2 pressures (Pcrit) (b) versus temperature (°C) in published laboratory experiments (circles). For clarity, metabolic rates are shown only for the subset of species with Pcrit data. c, Location data from OBIS for all species with Pcrit measured at multiple temperatures, yielding calibrated Metabolic Index parameters. The number of species with occurrences in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans are labelled. Maps of the occurrences of individual species are available at

Extended Data Fig. 2 Correlations and diversity in traits that govern geographical range boundaries.

ac, The key traits that make up resting hypoxia vulnerability (Vh = αD/αS) (a), its temperature sensitivity (Eo = Ed − Es) (b) and the elevated hypoxia vulnerability under activity (Vh × Φcrit) (c) all exhibit significant correlations (standard linear regression, two-tailed t-test, P < 0.05) between their constitutive parameters, regardless of whether we use all 72 species (dashed lines) or the subset of 14 species (dotted lines) for which the traits themselves were derived from statistically significant fits to equations (1) and (2) (see Methods and Extended Data Table 1). As in Fig. 1, points and error bars (centred dot, if shorter than marker) are mean ± s.e.m. for species with more than two independent experimental temperatures. See Supplementary Table 1 for the number of independent temperature experiments used for each species. The number of species used in each correlation is n = 48 (a, b) and n = 56 (c). See Extended Data Table 1 for statistics on two-sided t-tests of trait correlations. df, Observed diversity in resting hypoxia vulnerability (Vh) (d), its temperature sensitivity (Eo) (e) and active hypoxia vulnerability (Vh × Φcrit) (f), is measured as the interquartile range (IQR) among all species (red bars). We also quantified the diversity in species traits in the absence of observed correlations in the underlying metabolic traits. The correlations are removed by replacing species variation in the indicated parameter with the interspecies mean value. The diversity of the resulting trait is recomputed from the IQR (blue bars). Specifically, we replace the variable αS (a) with its mean value to derive a new distribution and IQR of Vh (d, blue bar); replace the variable Es (b) with its mean value to derive a new distribution and IQR of Eo (e, blue bar) and replace the variable Φcrit (c) with its mean value to derive a new distribution and IQR of the active hypoxia tolerance (Vh × Φcrit; f, blue bar). For all three central traits, the correlation and putative trade-offs among the underlying constitutive parameters act to reduce the interspecies diversity of the trait that governs habitat range limits.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Temperature sensitivity of processes that govern the O2 supply.

a, The rate of diffusive flux across the boundary layer increases with temperature in proportion to Scn, where the Schmidt number (Sc) is the ratio of seawater viscosity (υ) to O2 diffusivity (κ). Typical values of the exponent, n, are −1/2, −2/3 and −1, depending on the underlying model of boundary layer renewal23. In all cases, the empirically derived curves (solid) are well approximated by an Arrhenius function (dashed) with corresponding activation energy parameters (that is, Es) ranging from 0.21 eV (for n = −1/2; blue) to 0.27 eV (for n = −2/3; green) and 0.42 eV (for n = −1; red). b, Experimental measurements of rates of the ventilation (solid) and circulation (dashed) of animals. Rates at multiple temperatures are from published studies of six species, including three annelids24 (Nereis virens, blue; Nereis succinea, brown; and Nereis diversicolor, gold; all with n = 6 independent experiments) and three chordates (Lepornis macrochirus26, red; Oncorhynchus mykiss51, green; Leiopotherupon unicolor25, cyan; all with n = 7 independent experiments). c, For each species, the temperature sensitivity of each rate is determined by fitting to an Arrhenius function above and below 20 °C, the approximate thermal midpoint of all data. Histograms of activation energy in each temperature range (insets) are significantly different (two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; P = 5× 10−4) for warm conditions (Es = 0.04 ± 0.18 (mean ± s.d.)) and cool waters (Es = 0.55 ± 0.15 (mean ± s.d.)). d, Distributions of Eo computed from experimental data at temperatures at or above 15 °C (red bars) are higher than for the same parameter computed using only temperatures at or below 15 °C (blue bars). For species for which at least two Pcrit values were available both above and below Tref, the difference between Eo for warm and cold temperatures (green bars) is always greater than zero, and has a mean value (0.55 eV) similar to the change in temperature dependence of ventilation and circulation rates across cold and warm temperatures (green bars in c).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Spatial distributions of the Metabolic Index, temperature and \({{\boldsymbol{p}}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) compared to occurrences of species that occupy diverse latitude and depth ranges.

ae, Species inhabit mid to high latitudes. fh, Species are found in tropical waters. Fields of Φ (colours), temperature and O2 pressure are zonally averaged over the longitudinal range of each species. a, Cyclopterus lumpus (95 °W–35 °E). b, Tautogolabrus adspersus (50–80 °W). c, Gadus morhua (75 °W–40 °E). d, Zoarces viviparus (10 °W–30 °E). e, Gadus ogac (110 °W–40 °E). f, Penaeus aztecus (40–120 °W). g, Funchalia villosa (100 °W–40 °E). h, Gennadas valens (100 °W–47 °E). Observed species occurrences are plotted (blue dots). A single lower limit of Φ bounding each species range is contoured (Φcrit; black lines) alongside isotherms of temperature (white lines; °C) and isopleths of \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) (grey lines; atm). Published upper thermal limits (CTmax) are contoured in green where available, based on maximum monthly ocean temperatures (°C). Green asterisks denote species for which CTmax occurs above all mapped maximum monthly temperatures. For most species, Φcrit more skilfully categorizes occupied habitat than either upper temperature limits or lower \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) considered individually. This skill is shown by the ratio of F1-scores of Φ relative to temperature or to \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) (in parentheses, respectively) from the full four-dimensional species distribution. For G. morhua, the monthly range of Φcrit is also mapped (dashed black lines). For G. ogac, mapped occurrences, Φ and water properties are from the Atlantic Ocean only. Land regions are shaded in grey.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Maps of the Metabolic Index, temperature and \({{\boldsymbol{p}}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) compared to species distributions.

af, Mapped variables are averaged from the surface to the 95th percentile depth of each species. ac, P. borealis (0–450 m). df, Stenobrachius leucopsarus (0–225 m). A single lower limit of Φ (Φcrit; black lines) is consistent with habitat range limits found in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans for P. borealis (a) and different sides of the Pacific Ocean for S. leucopsarus (d). By contrast, no single maximum temperature or minimum \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) is consistent with each species’ range limit across those regions. The increased skill of Φcrit is encapsulated by the higher F1-scores of Φ relative to temperature (b, e) or to \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) (c, f) (in parentheses, respectively) from the full four-dimensional species distribution. Occurrence data for each species are shown (blue dots).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Spatial distributions of the P. borealis, S. canicula and S. plicata compared with the Metabolic Index, temperature and \({{\boldsymbol{p}}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\).

ai, Spatial distributions of the species shown in Fig. 2 (P. borealis, S. canicula and S. plicata) were compared with the Metabolic Index (a, d, g), temperature (b, e, h) and \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) (c, f, i). ac, P. borealis. df, S. canicula. gi, S. plicata. A single lower limit of Φ bounding each species range is contoured (Φcrit; black lines). For all species, Φcrit more skilfully categorizes occupied habitat than either temperature limits or lower \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) considered individually. This skill is shown by the higher ratio of F1-scores of Φ relative to temperature or to \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) (in parentheses, respectively) from the full four-dimensional species distribution. Occurrence data for each species are shown (blue dots). Regions for zonal averaging are as in Fig. 2.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Predictive skill of the Metabolic Index in delineating the species geographical range, compared with temperature or \({{\boldsymbol{p}}}_{{{\bf{O}}}_{{\bf{2}}}}\) alone.

The F1-score measures the ability of each environmental variable at a given threshold value to categorize the ocean into inhabited and uninhabited regions. The maximum F1-score for Φ is then compared with the maximum value for temperature or \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) thresholds and plotted on a log10 scale such that positive (negative) values indicate a stronger (weaker) predictive skill for Φ. Printed numbers (n) on the graph indicate the number of species that fall within each quadrant (for numbers in quadrants) or to each side of the axes (for numbers on axes). For example, Φ outperforms T in 44 species, and underperforms in only 4, and outperforms both T and \({p}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}\) in 30 species. A maximum F1-score was found for 48 species, while 8 additional species had no clear maximum in F1-score.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Critical value of the Metabolic Index at the limit of species geographical range (Φcrit).

a, The values of Φcrit are compared using two independent methods. The first (y axis) is determined from the peak in the F1-score for categorization into occupied and unoccupied sites (see Methods). The second (x axis) is determined from the bottom percentile (5–10%) of Φ values inhabited by the species. b, The histogram of Φcrit is not sensitive to the number of occurrence observations. c, For all species, waters with lower Φ values than Φcrit exist within the depth range of these species, but lack confirmed specimens. The dashed line indicates the 1:1 line.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Relationship between Φcrit and the ratio of maximum-to-resting metabolic rates (MMR/RMR), among all species with empirical estimates of both parameters.

Blue dots, species with empirical estimates of both parameters (Supplementary Table 1). Lines of constant wR (see equation (9) are shown for a sustained metabolic rate that is equal to the resting rate (SMS = 1; wR = 1; blue line), the maximum metabolic rate (SMS = FAS; wR = 0; red line) or the mean apparent species value (wR = 0.4; green line) in which sustained the metabolic rate is approximately midway between minimal (resting) and maximal rates. Independent geochemical estimate of SMS based on carbon isotopes in the otoliths of Atlantic cod28 are shown as a triangle.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Relationship across species between thermal tolerance of species measured in laboratory studies and predicted from the Metabolic Index.

Critical thermal maxima (CTmax), reported in previous studies, were measured at the onset of loss of physiological function in a resting state. The ATmax are predicted from the Metabolic Index, as the temperature at which the O2 threshold for metabolic rate in either resting state (Pcrit) or under sustained activity levels (Pcrit × Φcrit), reaches the mean atmospheric O2 pressure, Patm (see Methods, equation (10)). The extrapolation of Pcrit curves to the atmospheric pressure is based on n = 3 independent estimates of the linear increase in Eo with temperature (see Methods). Points for each species are the mean, and error bars show the range among the resulting n = 3 estimates of ATmax. Data are shown for all species in Fig. 5, for which all parameters are available (n = 7). For four out of seven species, the ATmax is reached before the CTmax, even in a resting state. For all seven species, the active ATmax is reached at a lower temperature than the CTmax, and is comparable to the maximum temperature that the species inhabits at atmospheric pressure.

Extended Data Table 1 Summary statistical tests of the relationships between metabolic and hypoxia traits and between distributions of Φcrit and SMS

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Table containing species metabolic and hypoxia traits, and model statistics.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deutsch, C., Penn, J.L. & Seibel, B. Metabolic trait diversity shapes marine biogeography. Nature 585, 557–562 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing