This is an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Nature Research are providing this early version of the manuscript as a service to our authors and readers. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting and a proof review before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute infection of the respiratory tract that emerged in late 20191,2. Initial outbreaks in China involved 13.8% of cases with severe courses, and 6.1% of cases with critical courses3. This severe presentation may result from the virus using a virus receptor that is expressed predominantly in the lung2,4; the same receptor tropism is thought to have determined the pathogenicity—but also aided in the control—of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 20035. However, there are reports of cases of COVID-19 in which the patient shows mild upper respiratory tract symptoms, which suggests the potential for pre- or oligosymptomatic transmission6,7,8. There is an urgent need for information on virus replication, immunity and infectivity in specific sites of the body. Here we report a detailed virological analysis of nine cases of COVID-19 that provides proof of active virus replication in tissues of the upper respiratory tract. Pharyngeal virus shedding was very high during the first week of symptoms, with a peak at 7.11 × 108 RNA copies per throat swab on day 4. Infectious virus was readily isolated from samples derived from the throat or lung, but not from stool samples—in spite of high concentrations of virus RNA. Blood and urine samples never yielded virus. Active replication in the throat was confirmed by the presence of viral replicative RNA intermediates in the throat samples. We consistently detected sequence-distinct virus populations in throat and lung samples from one patient, proving independent replication. The shedding of viral RNA from sputum outlasted the end of symptoms. Seroconversion occurred after 7 days in 50% of patients (and by day 14 in all patients), but was not followed by a rapid decline in viral load. COVID-19 can present as a mild illness of the upper respiratory tract. The confirmation of active virus replication in the upper respiratory tract has implications for the containment of COVID-19.

Data availability

Sequence data are available in Gisaid under accession number EPI_ISL_406862. All other data are available from C.D. upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Zhu, N. et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733 (2020).

  2. 2.

    Gorbalenya, A. E. et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: the species and its viruses – a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.07.937862v1 (2020).

  3. 3.

    WHO. Report of the WHO–China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf (WHO, 2020).

  4. 4.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. The novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) uses the SARS-coronavirus receptor ACE2 and the cellular protease TMPRSS2 for entry into target cells. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.31.929042v1 (2020).

  5. 5.

    Leung, G. M. et al. The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 141, 662–673 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Rothe, C. et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 970–971 (2020).

  7. 7.

    Holshue, M. L. et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 929–936 (2020).

  8. 8.

    Hoehl, S. et al. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in returning travelers from Wuhan, China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1278–1280 (2020).

  9. 9.

    Zou, L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1177–1179 (2020).

  10. 10.

    Young, B. E. et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. J. Am. Med. Assoc. (2020).

  11. 11.

    Böhmer, M. et al. Outbreak of COVID-19 in Germany resulting from a single travel-associated primary case. Preprint at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3551335 (2020).

  12. 12.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT–PCR. Euro Surveill. 25, (2020).

  13. 13.

    Drosten, C. et al. Evaluation of advanced reverse transcription–PCR assays and an alternative PCR target region for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 2043–2047 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Peiris, J. S. et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet 361, 1767–1772 (2003).

  15. 15.

    Poon, L. L. et al. Detection of SARS coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome by conventional and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays. Clin. Chem. 50, 67–72 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Ksiazek, T. G. et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1953–1966 (2003).

  17. 17.

    Drosten, C. et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1967–1976 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Peiris, J. S. et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361, 1319–1325 (2003).

  19. 19.

    Bertram, S. et al. Influenza and SARS-coronavirus activating proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT are expressed at multiple sites in human respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. PLoS ONE 7, e35876 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Xu, H. et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral Sci. 12, 8 (2020).

  21. 21.

    Belouzard, S., Chu, V. C. & Whittaker, G. R. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5871–5876 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, 477–483 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Zhou, J. et al. Human intestinal tract serves as an alternative infection route for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao4966 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Leung, W. K. et al. Enteric involvement of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection. Gastroenterology 125, 1011–1017 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Chen, N. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395, 507–513 (2020).

  26. 26.

    Drosten, C. et al. Transmission of MERS-coronavirus in household contacts. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 828–835 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Müller, M. A. et al. Presence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus antibodies in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide, cross-sectional, serological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 559–564 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Assays for laboratory confirmation of novel human coronavirus (hCoV-EMC) infections. Euro Surveill. 17, 20334 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the German Ministry of Research (01KI1723A) and the European Union (602525) to C.D. as well as by the German Bundeswehr Medical Service Biodefense Research Program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis or decision to publish. We thank P. Mackeldanz, E. Möncke-Buchner, A. Richter, M. Schmidt and J. Beheim-Schwarzbach for technical assistance.

Author information

R.W. and V.M.C. planned and supervised laboratory testing, and evaluated data. W.G. and M.S. managed patients and evaluated clinical data. S.Z., T.B., S.B., J.S., R.E. and K.Z. performed laboratory testing. M.A.M. managed serological laboratory testing. D.N. managed and performed virus isolation studies. T.C.J. analysed sequences and population-specific polymorphisms. P.V. managed laboratory testing. C.R. managed initial patient contacts. M.H. managed initial patient contacts and evaluated clinical data. C.D. designed and supervised laboratory studies, and wrote the manuscript. C.W. designed and supervised clinical management and clinical data.

Correspondence to Christian Drosten or Clemens Wendtner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Peter Openshaw and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Sequence analysis of E gene subgenomic mRNA.

The leader sequence (purple), putative transcription regulatory sequences (TRS) (grey) and nucleotides coding for the 5′-proximal part of the E gene (yellow box) are shown. PCR primer binding sites used for amplification and RT–PCR detection are shown as green arrows, and the 5′-nuclease PCR probe is shown as a red arrow.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Recombinant SARS-CoV-2-spike-based immunofluorescence test shows seroconversion of patient no.

 4. Representative outcome of a recombinant immunofluorescence test using serum dilutions 1:10, 1:100, 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 of patient no. 4 at 5 and 17 days after the onset of symptoms. Secondary detection was done by using a goat-anti human immunoglobulin labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 (shown in green). The experiment was performed in duplicate.

Extended Data Table 1 IgG immunofluorescence titres against endemic human coronaviruses

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, which include a description of RNA extraction and RT-PCR methods, a description of cell culture and antibody detection methods and Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wölfel, R., Corman, V.M., Guggemos, W. et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.