Letter | Published:

Random anti-lasing through coherent perfect absorption in a disordered medium

Naturevolume 567pages351355 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Non-Hermitian wave engineering is a recent and fast-moving field that examines both fundamental and application-oriented phenomena1,2,3,4,5,6,7. One such phenomenon is coherent perfect absorption8,9,10,11—an effect commonly referred to as ‘anti-lasing’ because it corresponds to the time-reversed process of coherent emission of radiation at the lasing threshold (where all radiation losses are exactly balanced by the optical gain). Coherent perfect absorbers (CPAs) have been experimentally realized in several setups10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18, with the notable exception of a CPA in a disordered medium (a medium without engineered structure). Such a ‘random CPA’ would be the time-reverse of a ‘random laser’19,20, in which light is resonantly enhanced by multiple scattering inside a disorder. Because of the complexity of this scattering process, the light field emitted by a random laser is also spatially complex and not focused like a regular laser beam. Realizing a random CPA (or ‘random anti-laser’) is therefore challenging because it requires the equivalent of time-reversing such a light field in all its degrees of freedom to create coherent radiation that is perfectly absorbed when impinging on a disordered medium. Here we use microwave technology to build a random anti-laser and demonstrate its ability to absorb suitably engineered incoming radiation fields with near-perfect efficiency. Because our approach to determining these field patterns is based solely on far-field measurements of the scattering properties of a disordered medium, it could be suitable for other applications in which waves need to be perfectly focused, routed or absorbed.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Berry, M. V. Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies. Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039–1047 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Bender, C. M. Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947–1018 (2007).

  3. 3.

    Moiseyev, N. Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

  4. 4.

    Heiss, W. D. The physics of exceptional points. J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Feng, L., El-Ganainy, R. & Ge, L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry. Nat. Photon. 11, 752–762 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Longhi, S. Parity-time symmetry meets photonics: a new twist in non-Hermitian optics. Europhys. Lett. 120, 64001 (2017).

  7. 7.

    El-Ganainy, R. et al. Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry. Nat. Phys. 14, 11–19 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Chong, Y. D., Ge, L., Cao, H. & Stone, A. D. Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).

  9. 9.

    Longhi, S. PT-symmetric laser absorber. Phys. Rev. A 82, 031801 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Wan, W. et al. Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption. Science 331, 889–892 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Baranov, D. G., Krasnok, A., Shegai, T., Alù, A. & Chong, Y. Coherent perfect absorbers: linear control of light with light. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17064 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Pu, M. et al. Ultrathin broadband nearly perfect absorber with symmetrical coherent illumination. Opt. Express 20, 2246–2254 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Bruck, R. & Muskens, O. L. Plasmonic nanoantennas as integrated coherent perfect absorbers on SOI waveguides for modulators and all-optical switches. Opt. Express 21, 27652 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Sun, Y., Tan, W., Li, H., Li, J. & Chen, H. Experimental demonstration of a coherent perfect absorber with PT phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143903 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Roger, T. et al. Coherent perfect absorption in deeply subwavelength films in the single-photon regime. Nat. Commun. 6, 7031 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Wong, Z. J. et al. Lasing and anti-lasing in a single cavity. Nat. Photon. 10, 796–801 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Meng, C., Zhang, X., Tang, S. T., Yang, M. & Yang, Z. Acoustic coherent perfect absorbers as sensitive null detectors. Sci. Rep. 7, 43574 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Richoux, O., Achilleos, V., Theocharis, G. & Brouzos, I. Subwavelength interferometric control of absorption in three-port acoustic network. Sci. Rep. 8, 12328 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Cao, H. Lasing in random media. Waves Random Media 13, R1–R39 (2003).

  20. 20.

    Wiersma, D. S. The physics and applications of random lasers. Nat. Phys. 4, 359–367 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Lerosey, G., de Rosny, J., Tourin, A. & Fink, M. Focusing beyond the diffraction limit with far-field time reversal. Science 315, 1120–1122 (2007).

  22. 22.

    Mosk, A. P., Lagendijk, A., Lerosey, G. & Fink, M. Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media. Nat. Photon. 6, 283–292 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Rotter, S. & Gigan, S. Light fields in complex media: mesoscopic scattering meets wave control. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015005 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Kaina, N., Dupré, M., Lerosey, G. & Fink, M. Shaping complex microwave fields in reverberating media with binary tunable metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 4, 6693 (2015); erratum 5, 7966 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Ma, G., Fan, X., Sheng, P. & Fink, M. Shaping reverberating sound fields with an actively tunable metasurface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6638–6643 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Gerlach, D. & Paulraj, A. Base station transmitting antenna arrays for multipath environments. Signal Process. 54, 59–73 (1996).

  27. 27.

    Li, H., Suwunnarat, S., Fleischmann, R., Schanz, H. & Kottos, T. Random matrix theory approach to chaotic coherent perfect absorbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 044101 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Fyodorov, Y. V., Suwunnarat, S. & Kottos, T. Distribution of zeros of the S matrix of chaotic cavities with localized losses and coherent perfect absorption: non-perturbative results. J. Phys. A 50, 30LT01 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Chong, Y. D. & Stone, A. D. Hidden black: coherent enhancement of absorption in strongly scattering media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163901 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Jackson, J. D. Classical electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009).

  31. 31.

    Cai, M., Painter, O. & Vahala, K. J. Observation of critical coupling in a fiber taper to a silica-microsphere whispering-gallery mode system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 74–77 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Tischler, J. R., Bradley, M. S. & Bulović, V. Critically coupled resonators in vertical geometry using a planar mirror and a 5 nm thick absorbing film. Opt. Lett. 31, 2045–2047 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.P., M.K., A.B., P.A. and S.R. were supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through project I 1142- N27 (GePartWave). J.B. and U.K. were supported by the French Science Fund (ANR) through project GePartWave and by the European Union via the H2020 project OpenFet NEMF21. The computational results presented here were achieved in part using the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC).

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Simon Horsley, Otto Muskens, Riccardo Sapienza and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors jointly supervised this work: Ulrich Kuhl, Stefan Rotter.

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), Vienna, Austria

    • Kevin Pichler
    • , Matthias Kühmayer
    • , Andre Brandstötter
    • , Philipp Ambichl
    •  & Stefan Rotter
  2. Institut de Physique de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Nice, France

    • Julian Böhm
    •  & Ulrich Kuhl

Authors

  1. Search for Kevin Pichler in:

  2. Search for Matthias Kühmayer in:

  3. Search for Julian Böhm in:

  4. Search for Andre Brandstötter in:

  5. Search for Philipp Ambichl in:

  6. Search for Ulrich Kuhl in:

  7. Search for Stefan Rotter in:

Contributions

Measurements and data evaluation were carried out by K.P. under the supervision of U.K. J.B. and U.K. designed the experimental setup. S.R. proposed the project and supervised the theoretical and numerical tasks carried out by M.K., K.P., A.B. and P.A. K.P. and S.R. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ulrich Kuhl or Stefan Rotter.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Central antenna coupling.

    The plot shows the reflection signal \({\left|R\right|}^{2}\) measured for injection at the central antenna as a function of the signal frequency for different antenna lengths in the disordered configuration with 60 small scatterers shown in Fig. 1. One observes very clearly that at certain frequencies, pronounced minima of the reflection signal, and therefore maxima in the coupling efficiency of the antenna occur. For increasing antenna length these minima become lower until an optimal length is reached that is specific to each minimum (corresponding to ‘critical coupling’). By further increasing the antenna length, the coupling efficiency decreases again. For the minimum in the frequency range around 7.1 GHz (see also main text) the optimal antenna length is 7 mm, whereas in the range around 6.8 GHz a length of 7.5 mm provides the highest coupling efficiency.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Simulated energy-flux distribution in the entire scattering region.

    As a complement to Fig. 3, we provide here not only the simulated intensity (top panels) but also the Poynting vector (bottom panels) of the CPA states in the entire scattering region. In the top panels scatterers are displayed as white circles, with the white arrow indicating the position of the absorbing scatterer (that is, the central antenna), whereas in the bottom panels semi-transparent circles mark the scatterers and the filled circle represents the central antenna. For clarity, we plot the Poynting vectors on a different grid of points from that used in the insets in Fig. 3.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Simulated intensity distribution in the presence and absence of the absorbing antenna.

    To illustrate the effect of the absorbing scatterer (that is, the central antenna) on the microwave field, we compare the simulated intensity distributions of the CPA states discussed in the main text, injected here in the presence (top panels) and absence (bottom panels) of this absorber (all other parameters and the colour scale stay unchanged). The white arrow indicates the antenna position and white circles represent the scatterers. One can clearly observe that removing the absorbing scatterer causes considerably higher and differently distributed intensity maxima in the waveguide, stemming from additional interference contributions of the waves that are no longer absorbed by the antenna.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This file contains 1) Additional measurement data, 2) Reports on performance checks, 3) More in-depth discussion of results presented in the main text. The file has 14 pages and contains 7 display items in colour.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0971-3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.