Letter | Published:

Enzymatic assembly of carbon–carbon bonds via iron-catalysed sp3 C–H functionalization

Naturevolume 565pages6772 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Although abundant in organic molecules, carbon–hydrogen (C–H) bonds are typically considered unreactive and unavailable for chemical manipulation. Recent advances in C–H functionalization technology have begun to transform this logic, while emphasizing the importance of and challenges associated with selective alkylation at a sp3 carbon1,2. Here we describe iron-based catalysts for the enantio-, regio- and chemoselective intermolecular alkylation of sp3 C–H bonds through carbene C–H insertion. The catalysts, derived from a cytochrome P450 enzyme in which the native cysteine axial ligand has been substituted for serine (cytochrome P411), are fully genetically encoded and produced in bacteria, where they can be tuned by directed evolution for activity and selectivity. That these proteins activate iron, the most abundant transition metal, to perform this chemistry provides a desirable alternative to noble-metal catalysts, which have dominated the field of C–H functionalization1,2. The laboratory-evolved enzymes functionalize diverse substrates containing benzylic, allylic or α-amino C–H bonds with high turnover and excellent selectivity. Furthermore, they have enabled the development of concise routes to several natural products. The use of the native iron-haem cofactor of these enzymes to mediate sp3 C–H alkylation suggests that diverse haem proteins could serve as potential catalysts for this abiological transformation, and will facilitate the development of new enzymatic C–H functionalization reactions for applications in chemistry and synthetic biology.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

All relevant data are provided in Supplementary Information. Any additional information is available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hartwig, J. F. & Larsen, M. A. Undirected, homogeneous C–H bond functionalization: challenges and opportunities. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 281–292 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Saint-Denis, T. G., Zhu, R.-Y., Chen, G., Wu, Q.-F. & Yu, J.-Q. Enantioselective C(sp3)‒H bond activation by chiral transition metal catalysts. Science 359, eaao4798 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Frey, P. A. & Hegeman, A. D. Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms Ch. 14 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2007).

  4. 4.

    Yokoyama, K. & Lilla, E. A. C–C bond forming radical SAM enzymes involved in the construction of carbon skeletons of cofactors and natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 660–694 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Bauerle, M. R., Schwalm, E. L. & Booker, S. J. Mechanistic diversity of radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 3995–4002 (2015).

  6. 6.

    McLaughlin, M. I. & van der Donk, W. A. Stereospecific radical-mediated B12-dependent methyl transfer by the fosfomycin biosynthesis enzyme Fom3. Biochemistry 57, 4967–4971 (2018).

  7. 7.

    Shisler, K. A. & Broderick, J. B. Glycyl radical activating enzymes: structure, mechanism, and substrate interactions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 546, 64–71 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Poulos, T. L. Heme enzyme structure and function. Chem. Rev. 114, 3919–3962 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Coelho, P. S., Brustad, E. M., Kannan, A. & Arnold, F. H. Olefin cyclopropanation via carbene transfer catalyzed by engineered cytochrome P450 enzymes. Science 339, 307–310 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Kan, S. B. J., Lewis, R. D., Chen, K. & Arnold, F. H. Directed evolution of cytochrome c for carbon–silicon bond formation: bringing silicon to life. Science 354, 1048–1051 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Brandenberg, O. F., Fasan, R. & Arnold, F. H. Exploiting and engineering hemoproteins for abiological carbene and nitrene transfer reactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 47, 102–111 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Liao, K. et al. Site-selective and stereoselective functionalization of non-activated tertiary C–H bonds. Nature 551, 609–613 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Weldy, N. M. et al. Iridium(iii)-bis(imidazolinyl)phenyl catalysts for enantioselective C–H functionalization with ethyl diazoacetate. Chem. Sci. 7, 3142–3146 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Wang, Y., Wen, X., Cui, X. & Zhang, X. P. Enantioselective radical cyclization for construction of 5-membered ring structures by metalloradical C‒H alkylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4792–4796 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Caballero, A. et al. Silver-catalyzed C–C bond formation between methane and ethyl diazoacetate in supercritical CO2. Science 332, 835–838 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Wu, W.-T., Yang, Z.-P. & You, S.-L. in Asymmetric Functionalization of C–H Bonds (ed. You, S.-L.) Ch. 1 (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2015).

  17. 17.

    Key, H. M., Dydio, P., Clark, D. S. & Hartwig, J. F. Abiological catalysis by artificial haem proteins containing noble metals in place of iron. Nature 534, 534–537 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Mbuvi, H. M. & Woo, L. K. Catalytic C–H insertions using iron(iii) porphyrin complexes. Organometallics 27, 637–645 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Li, Y., Huang, J.-S., Zhou, Z.-Y., Che, C.-M. & You, X.-Z. Remarkably stable iron porphyrins bearing nonheteroatom-stabilized carbene or (alkoxycarbonyl)carbenes: isolation, X-ray crystal structures, and carbon atom transfer reactions with hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 13185–13193 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Griffin, J. R., Wendell, C. I., Garwin, J. A. & White, M. C. Catalytic C(sp3)–H alkylation via an iron carbene intermediate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13624–13627 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Herschlag, D. & Natarajan, A. Fundamental challenges in mechanistic enzymology: progress toward understanding the rate enhancements of enzymes. Biochemistry 52, 2050–2067 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Prier, C. K., Zhang, R. K., Buller, A. R., Brinkmann-Chen, S. & Arnold, F. H. Enantioselective, intermolecular benzylic C–H amination catalysed by an engineered iron-haem enzyme. Nat. Chem. 9, 629–634 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Renata, H. et al. Identification of mechanism-based inactivation in P450-catalyzed cyclopropanation facilitates engineering of improved enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 12527–12533 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Zhang, J.-T. et al. Total synthesis of malyngamides K, L, and 5″-epi-C and absolute configuration of malyngamide L. J. Org. Chem. 76, 3946–3959 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Edwards, J. T. et al. Decarboxylative alkenylation. Nature 545, 213–218 (2017).

  26. 26.

    He, J., Hamann, L. G., Davies, H. M. L. & Beckwith, R. E. J. Late-stage C–H functionalization of complex alkaloids and drug molecules via intermolecular rhodium-carbenoid insertion. Nat. Commun. 6, 5943 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Yang, J.-M., Cai, Y., Zhu, S.-F. & Zhou, Q.-L. Iron-catalyzed arylation of α-aryl-α-diazoesters. Org. Biomol. Chem. 14, 5516–5519 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Xu, B., Li, M.-L., Zuo, X.-D., Zhu, S.-F. & Zhou, Q.-L. Catalytic asymmetric arylation of α-aryl-α-diazoacetates with aniline derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8700–8703 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Cardillo, G., Gentilucci, L., Qasem, A. R., Sgarzi, F. & Spampinato, S. Endomorphin-1 analogues containing β-proline are μ-opioid receptor agonists and display enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis resistance. J. Med. Chem. 45, 2571–2578 (2002).

  30. 30.

    Sridharan, V., Suryavanshi, P. A. & Menéndez, J. C. Advances in the chemistry of tetrahydroquinolines. Chem. Rev. 111, 7157–7259 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Coelho, P. S. et al. A serine-substituted P450 catalyzes highly efficient carbene transfer to olefins in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 485–487 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (grant MCB-1513007). R.K.Z. acknowledges support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (grant DGE-1144469) and the Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center. X.H. is supported by a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship (grant F32GM125231). L.W. received support from the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation. We thank A. Z. Zhou for experimental assistance; N. W. Goldberg, S. C. Hammer, K. E. Hernandez, Z. Jia, A. M. Knight, G. Kubik, R. D. Lewis, C. K. Prier, D. K. Romney and J. Zhang for discussions; S. Virgil, M. Shahgholi and D. VanderVelde for analytical support; and B. Stoltz for use of polarimeter and gas chromatography equipment.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks B. de Bruin, N. Turner and T. Ward for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Author notes

    • Lena Wohlschlager

    Present address: Institute of Food Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

    • Hans Renata

    Present address: Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA

Affiliations

  1. Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    • Ruijie K. Zhang
    • , Kai Chen
    • , Xiongyi Huang
    • , Lena Wohlschlager
    • , Hans Renata
    •  & Frances H. Arnold

Authors

  1. Search for Ruijie K. Zhang in:

  2. Search for Kai Chen in:

  3. Search for Xiongyi Huang in:

  4. Search for Lena Wohlschlager in:

  5. Search for Hans Renata in:

  6. Search for Frances H. Arnold in:

Contributions

R.K.Z. designed the overall research with F.H.A. providing guidance. R.K.Z. and H.R. designed and conducted the initial screening of haem proteins; R.K.Z. and L.W. performed the directed evolution experiments. R.K.Z., K.C. and X.H. designed and performed the substrate scope studies. R.K.Z. and F.H.A. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Competing interests

A provisional patent application has been filed through the California Institute of Technology based on the results presented here.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frances H. Arnold.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This file contains experimental procedures, information about enzyme variants, Supplementary Figures 1–15, Supplementary Tables 1–13, and additional data. Please see the table of contents for details.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0808-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.