Given that sexual pleasure is a core component of sexual health, devices that are designed to enhance and diversify sexual pleasure are particularly useful in clinical practice. Despite their growing popularity and widespread use in various biopsychosocial circumstances, many taboos still seem to exist, as indicated by the paucity of scientific literature on the prevalence, application and effectiveness of sexual devices for therapeutic use. However, sex toys and sexual devices are commonly used and have a variety of indications to expand individual and partnered sexuality and to treat sexual difficulties. Different devices are associated with specific advantages and potential risks, opportunities, barriers and ethical challenges when used in a clinical context. Increased knowledge about the aim and functional possibilities of sexual devices might help health-care professionals overcome potential embarrassment, preconceptions and other barriers, learn which patients might benefit from which products, consider their use in treatment programmes, educate about correct use and safety issues, and facilitate open communication about sexual pleasure with their patients.
Sexual devices are primarily designed to improve sexual well-being, pleasure, recreation, freedom and diversity.
Despite the increasing accessibility and popularity of sexual devices in society, for some health-care professionals in clinical practice they remain a taboo subject.
Health-care professionals should be encouraged to keep an open mind around the use of sexual devices and to assist their clients in obtaining the knowledge and skills necessary for their correct and safe use.
Sexual devices are commonly used and have a variety of indications to expand individual and partnered sexuality and to assist in the treatment of sexual difficulties.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Brotto, L. A. & Smith, K. B. In APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology Vol. 1 (eds Tolman D. L. & Diamond, L. M.) p. 205–244 (American Psychological Association, 2014) [APA handbooks in psychology].
World Health Organization. Sexual and reproductive health and research including the Special Programme HRP. WHO https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/sexual_health/sh_definitions/en/ (2020).
Meston, C. M. & Buss, D. M. Why humans have sex. Arch. Sex. Behav. 36, 477–507 (2007).
Piha, S., Hurmerinta, L., Järvinen, E., Räikönen, J. & Sandberg, B. Escaping into sexual play: a consumer experience perspective. Leis. Sci. 42, 289–305 (2020).
Rubin, E. S., Deshpande, N. A., Vasquez, P. J. & Kellogg Spadt, S. A clinical reference guide on sexual devices for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet. Gynecol. 133, 1259–1268 (2019).
Queen, C. Sexual enhancement products. J. Sex. Med. 10, 3155–3156 (2013).
Rosenberger, J. G., Schick, V., Herbenick, D., Novak, D. S. & Reece, M. Sex toy use by gay and bisexual men in the United States. Arch. Sex. Behav. 41, 449–458 (2012).
Doring, N. & Poeschl, S. Sex toys, sex dolls, sex robots: our under-researched bed-fellows. Sexologies 27, e51–e55 (2018).
Rivera, D. Sex toys through the ages. DailyOjo http://dailyojo.com/articles/sex-toys-through-the-ages.html (2009).
Starr, K. E. & Aron, L. Women on the couch: genital stimulation and the birth of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues 21, 373–392 (2011).
Laqueur, T. Solitary Sex: a Cultural History of Masturbation (Zone Books, 2003).
Marcus, B. S. Changes in a woman’s sexual experience and expectations following the introduction of electric vibrator assistance. J. Sex. Med. 8, 3398–3406 (2011).
Albrecht, L. Home Sex Toy Parties: a Non-Traditional, Uniquely Situated Venue of Sexuality Education for Women (University of Alberta, 2012).
Herbenick, D. et al. Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: results from a nationally representative study. J. Sex. Med. 6, 1857–1866 (2009).
Reece, M. et al. Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by men in the United States. J. Sex. Med. 6, 867–1874 (2009).
Reece, M. et al. Characteristics of vibrator use by gay and bisexually identified men in the United States. J. Sex. Med. 7, 3467–3476 (2010).
Döring, N. & Poeschl, S. Experiences with diverse sex toys among German heterosexual adults: findings from a national online survey. J. Sex. Res. 57, 885–896 (2020).
Wikipedia. Anti-Obscenity Enforcement Act. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Obscenity_Enforcement_Act# (2020).
The LGBT Sentinel. Traveling with sex toys could land you in trouble. The LGBT Sentinel http://www.thelgbtsentinel.com/traveling-sex-toys-land-trouble/ (2020).
Jannini, E. A., Limoncin, E., Ciocca, G., Buehler, S. & Krychman, M. Ethical aspects of sexual medicine. Internet, vibrators, and other sex aids: toys or therapeutic instruments. J. Sex. Med. 9, 2994–3001 (2012).
NAASAS. Adult novelties: sex toys, adult toys, marital aids, sexual health and pleasure products. NAASAS https://naasas.com/adult-novelties.htm (2020).
FDA. CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: clitoral engorgement device. FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=884.5970 (2020).
FDA. CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: powered vaginal muscle stimulator for therapeutic use. FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=884.5940 (2020).
Lewis, R. W. & Witherington, R. External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results. World J. Urol. 15, 78–82 (1997).
FDA. CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: external penile rigidity devices. FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=876.5020 (2020).
FDA. External penile rigidity devices – Class II: special controls guidance document for industry and FDA staff. FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/external-penile-rigidity-devices-class-ii-special-controls-guidance-document-industry-and-fda-staff (2018).
Department of Health & Human Services. Viberect penile vibratory stimulation device. FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf14/K142304.pdf (2014).
Gill, D. G. Human sexuality, ethical issues and the medical profession. Mid Am. Rev. Sociol. 7, 3–28 (1982).
Council of Europe. Sexuality. Council of Europe https://www.coe.int/en/web/gender-matters/sexuality (2020).
American University of Beirut. “Sexual rights are human rights; what about sexual pleasure?” – AUB panel on Human Rights Day. American University of Beirut https://www.aub.edu.lb/fhs/news/Pages/sexualrights_nasss.aspx (2017).
Richters, J. Sex in Australia: autoerotic, esoteric and other sexual practices engaged in by a representative sample of adults. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 27, 180–190 (2003).
Wood, J., Cran, S., Cunningham, S., Money, D. & O’Doherty, K. Cross-sectional survey of sex toy use, characteristics of sex toy use hygiene behaviours, and vulvovaginal health outcomes in Canada. Can. J. Hum. Sexuality 26, 196–204 (2017).
Bauer, G. R. et al. Factors impacting transgender patients’ discomfort with their family physicians: a respondent-driven sampling survey. PLoS ONE 17, e0145046 (2015).
Joyal, C. C. & Carpentier, J. The prevalence of paraphilic interests and behaviors in the general population: a provincial survey. J. Sex. Res. 54, 161–171 (2017).
Maddox, A. M., Rhoades, G. K. & Markman, H. J. Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: associations with relationship quality. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40, 441–448 (2011).
Döring, N. & Mohseni, M. R. Are online sexual activities and sexting good for adults’ sexual well-being? Results from a national online survey. Int. J. Sex. Health 30, 250–263 (2018).
Statista. How often do you use sex toys? Statista https://www.statista.com/forecasts/744534/use-frequency-of-sex-toys-by-female-consumers-in-the-us#:~:text=When%20it%20comes%20to%20the,they%20use%20sex%20toys%20daily.&text=The%20global%20sex%20toy%20market%20is%20growing (2021).
Rohleder, P. & Swartz, L. In Understanding Global Sexualities: New Frontiers (eds Aggleton, P., Boyce, P., Moore, H. L. & Parker, R.) 138–152 (Routledge, 2012).
Rullo, J. E. et al. Genital vibration for sexual function and enhancement: a review of evidence. Sex Relation Ther. 33, 263–274 (2018).
Miranda, E. P. et al. Application of sex aids in men with sexual dysfunction: a review. J. Sex. Med. 16, 1–14 (2019).
Barrett, C. & Hinchliff, S. (eds) Addressing the Sexual Rights of Older People: Theory, Policy and Practice (Routledge, 2017).
Reisman, Y. & Gianotten W. L. (eds) in Cancer, Intimacy and Sexuality (eds Reisman, Y. & Gianotten W. L.) 223–234 (Springer, 2017).
Bober, S. L. et al. Finding sexual health aids after cancer: are cancer centers supporting survivors’ needs? J. Cancer Surviv. 13, 224–230 (2019).
Syrjala, K. L. Filling the gaps in knowledge and treatments for sexual health in young adult male cancer survivors. Cancer 122, 2134–2137 (2016).
Hill, E. K. et al. Assessing gynecologic and breast cancer survivors’ sexual health care needs. Cancer 117, 2643–2651 (2011).
Albers, L. F. et al. Sexual health needs: how do breast cancer patients and their partners want information? J. Sex Marital Ther. 46, 205–226 (2020).
Schroder, M. A. et al. Clitoral therapy device for treatment of sexual dysfunction in irradiated cervical cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 61, 1078–1086 (2005).
National Forum of Gynecological Oncology Nurses, UK. International Guidelines on vaginal dilation after pelvic radiotherapy. OwenMumford https://owenmumford.com/us/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/11/Dilator-Best-Practice-Guidelines.pdf (2012).
Liu, M., Juravic, M., Mazza, G. & Krychman, M. L. Vaginal dilators: issues and answers. Sex. Med. Rev. 31, 30125–30128 (2020).
Morales, E. et al. Co-designing sex toys for adults with motor disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 36, 47–68 (2018).
Tepper, M. S. Sexuality and disability: the missing discourse of pleasure. Sex. Disabil. 18, 283–290 (2000).
Naphtali, K. et al. PleasureAble: sexual device manual for persons with disabilities (Disabilities Health Research Network, 2009).
Dennis, C. Brain development: the most important sexual organ. Nature 427, 390–392 (2004).
Alptraum, L. How to design sex toys for people with disabilities. VICE https://www.vice.com/en/article/9a3987/how-to-design-sex-toys-for-people-with-disabilities (2015).
Spiel, K., Brulè, E., Nacke, L. E., Harrer, S. & Grenzfurthner, J. Sex Toys and Neurodiversity. Presented at the CHI Conference, Montreal https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324866087_Sex_Toys_and_Neurodiversity (2018).
MacKenzie, A. Prejudicial stereotypes and testimonial injustice: autism, sexuality and sex education. Int. J. Educ. Res. 89, 110–118 (2019).
Michielsen, K. & Brockschmidt, L. Barriers to sexuality education for children and young people with disabilities in the WHO European region: a scoping review. Sex. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1851181 (2021).
Hyde, Z. et al. Prevalence of sexual activity and associated factors in men aged 75 to 95 years a cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 153, 693–702 (2010).
Kalra, G., Subramanyam, A. & Pinto, C. Sexuality: desire, activity and intimacy in the elderly. Indian J. Psychiat. 53, 300–306 (2011).
McCabe, M. P. et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J. Sex. Med. 13, 135–143 (2016).
Worsley, R. et al. Hormones and female sexual dysfunction: beyond estrogens and androgens – findings from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. J. Sex. Med. 13, 283–290 (2016).
Sonksen, J. & Ohl, D. A. Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. Int. J. Androl. 25, 324–332 (2002).
Fode, M., Ohl, D. & Sønksen, J. A step-wise approach to sperm retrieval in men with neurogenic anejaculation. Nat. Rev. Urol. 12, 607–616 (2015).
Varsha, S. et al. Reproductive health of men with spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal. Cord. Inj. Rehabil. 23, 31–41 (2017).
Brackett, N. L. et al. Treatment for ejaculatory dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury: an 18-year single center experience. J. Urol. 183, 2304–2308 (2010).
Nelson, C. J. et al. Assessment of penile vibratory stimulation as a management strategy in men with secondary retarded orgasm. Urology 69, 552–556 (2007).
Diamond, L. M. & Huebner, D. M. Is good sex good for you? Rethinking sexuality and health. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 6, 54–69 (2012).
Lieberman, H. Selling sex toys: marketing and the meaning of vibrators in early twentieth-century America. Enterp. Soc. 17, 393–433 (2016).
Gomes, L. M. & Wu, R. TouchYou: a wearable touch sensor and stimulator for using our own body as a remote sex interface. Paladyn 11, 147–160 (2020).
Laan, E. et al. Standard operating procedures for female orgasmic disorder: consensus of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. J. Sex. Med. 10, 74–82 (2013).
Leff, J. J. & Israel, M. The relationship between mode of female masturbation and achievement of orgasm in coitus. Arch. Sex. Behav. 12, 227–236 (1983).
Mintz, L. B. & Guiltelman, J. in Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy 6th edn (eds Hall, S. K. H. & Binik, Y. M.) 109–120 (Guilford, 2020).
Gruenwald, I. et al. Female sexual orgasmic dysfunction and genital sensation deficiency. J. Sex. Med. 17, 273–278 (2020).
Guess, M. K. et al. The effects of a genital vibratory stimulation device on sexual function and genital sensation. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 23, 256–262 (2017).
Graham, C. A. in Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy 5th edn (eds Binik Y. M. & Hall K. S. K.) 89–111 (Guilford, 2014).
Watson, E. D. et al. The impact of a couple’s vibrator on men’s perceptions of their own and their partner’s sexual pleasure and satisfaction. Men Masc. 19, 370–383 (2016).
Herbenick, D. et al. Association of lubricant use with women’s sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction, and genital symptoms: a prospective daily diary study. J. Sex. Med. 8, 202–212 (2011).
Herbenick, D. et al. Vibrators and other sex toys are commonly recommended to patients, but does size matter? Dimensions of commonly sold products. J. Sex. Med. 12, 641–645 (2015).
Gilmore, P. Best cock rings to use with a partner and in a couple. Cosmopolitan https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/sex/g12844366/best-cock-rings/ (2021).
Phallophile Reviews.Womanizer vs. Satisfyer vs. Lelo Sona: best clit suction stimulators ranking. Phallophile Reviews https://phallophilereviews.com/womanizer-vs-satisfyer-vs-lelo-sona-best-clit-suction-stimulators/ (2019).
Bilups, K. L. The role of mechanical devices in treating female sexual dysfunction and enhancing the female sexual response. World J. Urol. 20, 137–141 (2002).
Berman, L. A., Berman, J. R., Werbin, T., Chabra, S. & Goldstein, I. The use of the female intervention efficacy index (FIEI) as an immediate outcome measure of medical intervention to treat female sexual dysfunction. J. Sex. Marital. Ther. 27, 427–433 (2001).
Gray, E. R. & Klotz, H. L. Restoring sexual function in prostate cancer patients: an innovative approach. Can. J. Urol. 11, 2285–2289 (2004).
Warkentin, K. M. et al. Restoration of satisfying sex for a castrated cancer patient with complete impotence: a case study. J. Sex. Marital. Ther. 32, 389–399 (2006).
Cullen, K. et al. From “sex toy” to intrusive imposition: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences with vaginal dilator use following treatment for gynecological cancer. J. Sex. Med. 9, 1162–1173 (2012).
Ong, T. A. et al. Using the vibrance Kegel device with pelvic floor muscle exercise for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled pilot study. Urology 6, 487–491 (2015).
Polak, J. T. & Davila, G. W. in Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (eds Davila, G. W., Ghoniem, G. M., & Wexner, S. D.) 109–110 (Springer, 2009).
Dahlberg, M. et al. Retained sex toys: an increasing and possibly preventable medical condition. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 34, 181–183 (2019).
Clark, J. L. et al. Frequency, patterns, and preferences of lubricant use during anal intercourse within male sexual partnerships in Lima, Peru: implications for a rectal microbicide HIV prevention intervention. AIDS Care. 25, 579–585 (2013).
Levin, R. J. Prostate-induced orgasms: a concise review illustrated with a highly relevant case study. Clin. Anat. 31, 81–85 (2018).
Shen, S. L. et al. Clinical trials of combined therapy of an oral Chinese medicine with massage for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 12, 851–853 (2006).
Ateya, A. et al. Evaluation of prostatic massage in treatment of chronic prostatitis. Urology 67, 674–678 (2006).
Gilbert, H. W. & Gingell, J. C. Vacuum constriction devices: second-line conservative treatment for impotence. Br. J. Urol. 70, 81–83 (1992).
Li, E. et al. The mechanism of vacuum constriction devices in penile erection: the NO/cGMP signaling pathway? Med. Hypo. 75, 422–424 (2010).
Wang, R. Vacuum erectile device for rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. J. Sex. Med. 14, 184–186 (2017).
Raina, R. et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int. J. Impot. Res. 18, 77–81 (2006).
Kohler, T. S. et al. A pilot study on the early use of vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 100, 858–862 (2007).
Haahr, M. K. et al. A retrospective study of erectile function and use of erectile aids in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy in Denmark. Sex. Med. 5, e156–e162 (2017).
Reisman, Y. in Sikkelcelziekte een praktische handleiding (eds Schnog J. B., Brandjes, D. P. M., Duits, A. J., Rojer, R. A. & Muskiet, F. D.) (Van Zuiden, 2006).
Korenman, S. G. et al. Use of a vacuum tumescence device in the management of impotence. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38, 217–220 (1998).
Sidi, A. A. et al. Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with an external negative pressure device for impotence. J. Urol. 144, 1154–1156 (1990).
Moore, O. Vacuum devices in erectile dysfunction: indications and efficacy. BJU Int. 82, 673–681 (1998).
Wylie, K. R. & Hallam-Jones, R. A. The combination of penoscrotal rings and PDE5i’s in the treatment of erectile dysfunction – the Sheffield PDE5i and ring duo technique. Two case reports. Sex. Relation. Ther. 21, 209–215 (2007).
Koifman, L. et al. Treatment options and outcomes of penile constriction devices. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 45, 384–391 (2019).
Ussher, J. M. et al. Sexual rehabilitation after prostate cancer through assistive aids: a comparison of gay/bisexual and heterosexual men. J. Sex. Res. 56, 854–869 (2019).
Mehta, A., Deveci, S. & Mulhall, J. P. Efficacy of a penile variable tension loop for improving climacturia after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 111, 500–504 (2013).
Rullo, J. E. et al. Genital vibration for sexual function and enhancement: best practice recommendations for choosing and safely using a vibrator. J. Sex. Relation. Ther. 33, 275–285 (2018).
Levin, R. J. The breast/nipple/areola complex and human sexuality. Sex. Relation. Ther. 21, 237–249 (2006).
Kinsey, A. C. et al. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female p. 587 (Indiana Univ., 1998).
Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. The New Our Bodies, Ourselves: a Book by and for Women (Simon & Schuster, 1996).
Goren, A. et al. Topical alpha-1 adrenergic receptor agonist applied to the nipple/areola complex improves female orgasmic function. J. Women Health 29, 1017–1020 (2020).
Komisaruk, B. & Whipple, B. Non-genital orgasms. Sex. Relation. Ther. 26, 356–372 (2011).
Reece, M. et al. Men’s use and perceptions of commercial lubricants: prevalence and characteristics in a nationally representative sample of American adults. J. Sex. Med. 11, 1125–1135 (2014).
Statista. Usage of personal lubricants in the U.S. 2020. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/276824/us-households-usage-of-personal-lubricants/ (2021).
Carballo-Diéguez, A. et al. Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. Am. J. Public Health 90, 1117–1121 (2000).
Dodge, B. et al. Frequency, reasons for, and perceptions of lubricant use among a nationally representative sample of self-identified gay and bisexual men in the United States. J. Sex. Med. 11, 2396–2405 (2014).
Geibel, S. Condoms and condiments: compatibility and safety of personal lubricants and their use in Africa. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 16, 18531 (2013).
Brown, J. M. et al. Intravaginal practices and risk of bacterial vaginosis and candidiasis infection among a cohort of women in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 121, 773–780 (2013).
Richters, J. & Donovan, J. G. B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? An exploratory study. Int. J. STD AIDS 6, 11–18 (1995).
Dewitte, M., Borg, C. & Lowenstein, L. A psychosocial approach to female genital pain. Nat. Rev. Urolog. 15, 25–41 (2018).
Laan, E. & Both, S. What makes women experience desire? Femin. Psychol. 18, 505–514 (2013).
Liberati, N. Teledildonics and new ways of “being in touch”: a phenomenological analysis of the use of haptic devices for intimate relations. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 23, 801–823 (2017).
Wilson-Barnao, C. & Collie, N. The droning of intimacy: bodies, data, and sensory devices. Continuum. 32, 733–744 (2018).
Steensig, A. L. & Westh, J. Ø. Intimate Sensory Technology in Long Distance Relationships – a Thesis Study in the Sensescape of Teledildonics. Thesis, Aalborg University (2016).
Levy, D. The Evolution of Human–Robot Relationships: Love and Sex with Robots (Harper, 2007).
Richardson, K. Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE. Technol. Soc. Mag. 35, 46–53 (2016).
Eichenberg, C., Khamis, M. & Hübner, L. The attitudes of therapists and physicians on the use of sex robots in sexual therapy: online survey and interview study. J. Med. Internet. Res. 21, e13853 (2019).
Cassidy, V. For the love of doll(s): a patriarchal nightmare of cyborg couplings. ESC 42, 203–215 (2016).
Doring, N., Mohseni, M. R. & Walter, R. Design, use, and effects of sex dolls and sex robots: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e18551 (2020).
Knox, D., Huff, S. & Chang, I. Sex dolls – creepy or healthy? Attitudes of undergraduates. J. Posit. Sexuality 3, 32–37 (2017).
Scheutz, M. & Arnold, T. in 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI) 351–358 (IEEE, 2016).
Nordmo, M., Næss, J. Ø., Husøy, M. F. & Arnestad, M. N. Friends, lovers or nothing: men and women differ in their perceptions of sex robots and platonic love robots. Front. Psychol. 11, 355 (2020).
Cheok, A. et al. in Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies (eds Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Ciancarini, P.) 833–858 (Springer, 2017).
Fosch-Villaronga, E. & Poulsen, A. Sex care robots. Paladyn 11, 1–18 (2020).
Jecker, N. S. Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities. J. Med. Ethics. 47, 26–32 (2021).
Sprott, R. A. Reimagining “Kink”: transformation, growth, and healing through BDSM. J. Hum. Psychol. 20, 1–6 (2020).
Sprott, R. A. & Williams, D. J. Is BDSM a sexual orientation or serious leisure? Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 11, 75–79 (2019).
Sprott, R. A. & Benoit Hadcock, B. Bisexuality, pansexuality, queer identity and kink identity. Sex. Relation. Ther. 33, 214–232 (2018).
Anderson, J. & Paterek, E. Vaginal foreign body evaluation and treatment. in StatPearls [Internet]. (StatPearls, 2021).
Friedman, M. A. et al. Vesicovaginal fistula: an unexpected consequence of changing sexual practices? Sex. Health 14, 394–396 (2017).
Donaldson, J. F. et al. Obstructive uropathy and vesicovaginal fistula secondary to a retained sex toy in the vagina. J. Sex. Med. 11, 2595–2600 (2014).
Cook, R. L. et al. Sexual behaviors and other risk factors for oral human papillomavirus infections in young women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 41, 486–492 (2014).
Kwakwa, H. A. & Ghobrial, M. W. Female-to-female transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36, e40–e41 (2003).
Aaronson, D. S. & Shindel, A. W. Advocating for safer use of sexual enhancement products. J. Sex. Med. 7, 2285–2287 (2010).
Marfatia, Y. S., Patel, D., Menon, D. S. & Naswa, S. Genital contact allergy: a diagnosis missed. Indian J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 37, 1–6 (2016).
Rutala, W. A., Weber, D. J. & Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Disinfection and sterilization: guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/#r11 (2019).
Combs, C. A. & Fishman, A. A proposal to reduce the risk of transmission of human papilloma virus via transvaginal ultrasound. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 215, 63–67 (2016).
Chengalroyen, M. D. & Dabbs, E. R. The biodegradation of latex rubber: a minireview. J. Polym. Environ. 21, 874–880 (2013).
Anderson, T. A. et al. A study of human papillomavirus on vaginally inserted sex toys, before and after cleaning, among women who have sex with women and men. Sex. Transm. Infect. 90, 529–531 (2014).
Brandt, R. C. & Martens, R. I. Shattering glass cookware. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 91, 33–38 (2012).
Cantonwine, D. E. et al. Bisphenol A and human reproductive health. Expert Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 8, 329–335 (2013).
Matuszczak, E. et al. The impact of bisphenol A on fertility, reproductive system, and development: a review of the literature. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 4068717 (2019).
Kirana, P. S. et al. E-sexual health: a position statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. J. Sex. Med. 17, 1246–1253 (2020).
Pornhub. The year 2019 in review. Pornhub INSIGHTS https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2019-year-in-review (2019).
Döring, N. et al. Online sexual activity experiences among college students: a four-country comparison. Arch. Sex. Behavior. 46, 1641–1652 (2017).
Grov, C. et al. Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: a US online survey. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40, 429–439 (2011).
Shaughnessy, K., Byers, E. S., Clowater, S. L. & Kalinowski, A. Outcomes of arousal-oriented online sexual activities: perspectives from university and community samples. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43, 1187–1197 (2013).
Rissel, C. et al. A profile of pornography users in Australia: findings from the second Australian study of health and relationships. J. Sex. Res. 54, 227–240 (2016).
Grubbs, J. B., Kraus, S. W. & Perry, S. L. Self-reported addiction to pornography in a nationally representative sample: the roles of use habits, religiousness, and moral incongruence. J. Behav. Addict. 8, 88–93 (2018).
Dwulit, A. D. & Rzymski, P. The potential associations of pornography use with sexual dysfunctions: an integrative literature review of observational studies. J. Clin. Med. 8, 914 (2019).
Bélanger Lejars, V. O., Bélanger, C. H. & Razmak, J. Exploring new measures of online sexual activities, device use, and gender differences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 108, 106300 (2020).
Maas, M. K. & Dewey, S. Internet pornography use among collegiate women: gender attitudes, body monitoring, and sexual behavior. SAGE Open https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018786640 (2018).
Kohut, T. et al. Pornography’s associations with open sexual communication and relationship closeness vary as a function of dyadic patterns of pornography use within heterosexual relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 35, 655–675 (2018).
Willoughby, B., Leonhardt, N. & Augustus, R. Untangling the porn web: creating an organizing framework for pornography research among couples. J. Sex. Res. 57, 709–721 (2020).
Carroll, J. S., Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J. & Brown, C. The porn gap: differences in men’s and women’s pornography patterns in couple relationships. J. Couple Relation. Ther. 16, 146–163 (2017).
Wiederman, M. W. The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Fam. J. 13, 496–502 (2005).
Cowan, G. & Campbell, R. R. Rape causal attitudes among adolescents. J. Sex. Res. 32, 145–153 (1995).
Klaasen, M. J. E. & Peter, J. Gender (in)equality in internet pornography: a content analysis of popular pornographic internet videos. J. Sex. Res. 52, 721–735 (2015).
Rosted, W. L. et al. The association between exposure to violent pornography and teen dating violence in grade 10 high school students. Arch. Sex. Behav. 48, 2137–2147 (2019).
Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. M. & Yuen, C. Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggress. Behav. 36, 14–20 (2010).
Vangeel, L., Eggermont, S. & Vandenbosch, L. Does adolescent media use predict sexual stereotypes in adolescence and emerging adulthood? Associations with music television and online pornography exposure. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49, 1147–1161 (2020).
Mori, C. et al. Association of sexting with sexual behaviors and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 173, 770–779 (2019).
Peter, J. & Valkenburg, P. M. Adolescents and pornography: a review of 20 years of research. J. Sex. Res. 53, 509–531 (2016).
Aiken, M. The Cyber Effect: a Pioneering Cyberpsychologist Explains How Human Behavior Changes Online (John Murray, 2017).
Massey, K., Burns, J. & Franz, A. Young people, sexuality and the age of pornography. Sex. Cult. 25, 318–336 (2021).
Sevic, S. et al. The relationship between the use of social networking sites and sexually explicit material, the internalization of appearance ideals and body self-surveillance: results from a longitudinal study of male adolescents. J. Youth Adolesc. 49, 383–398 (2020).
Paslakis, G., Chiclana Actis, C. & Mestre-Bach, G. Associations between pornography exposure, body image and sexual body image: a systematic review. J. Health Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320967085 (2020).
Hald, G. M. et al. Does viewing explain doing? Assessing the association between sexually explicit materials use and sexual behaviors in a large sample of Dutch adolescents and young adults. J. Sex. Med. 10, 2986–2995 (2013).
Arrington-Sanders, R. et al. The role of sexually explicit material in the sexual development of same-sex-attracted black adolescent males. Arch. Sex. Behav. 44, 597–608 (2015).
Litsou, K., Byron, P., McKee, A. & Ingham, R. Learning from pornography: results of a mixed methods systematic review. Sex Educ. 21, 236–252 (2021).
Willoughby, B. J. & Leonhardt, N. D. Behind closed doors: individual and joint pornography use among romantic couples. J. Sex. Res. 57, 77–91 (2020).
Lin, W. H., Liu, C. H. & Yi, C. C. Exposure to sexually explicit media in early adolescence is related to risky sexual behavior in emerging adulthood. PLoS ONE 15, e0230242 (2020).
Minarcik, J., Wetterneck, C. T. & Short, M. B. The effects of sexually explicit material use on romantic relationship dynamics. J. Behav. Addict. 5, 700–707 (2016).
Park, B. Y. et al. Is internet pornography causing sexual dysfunctions? A review with clinical reports. Behav. Sci. 6, 17 (2016).
Duffy, A., Dawson, D. L. & das Nair, R. Pornography addiction in adults: a systematic review of definitions and reported impact. J. Sex. Med. 13, 760–777 (2016).
Gutiérrez-Puertas, L. et al. Online sexual activities among university students: relationship with sexual satisfaction. An. Psych. 36, 166–172 (2020).
Wright, P. J. & Tokunaga, R. S. Women’s perceptions of their male partners’ pornography consumption and relational, sexual, self, and body satisfaction: toward a theoretical model. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 42, 55–73 (2018).
Hesse, C. & Pedersen, C. L. Porn sex versus real sex: how sexually explicit material shapes our understanding of sexual anatomy, physiology, and behaviour. Sex. Cult. 21, 754–775 (2017).
Robinson, B. B. E. et al. Therapeutic uses of sexually explicit materials in the United States and the Czech and Slovak republics: a qualitative study. J. Sex. Marital. Therapy. 25, 103–119 (1999).
Brewster, M. & Wylie, K. R. The use of sexually explicit material in clinical, educational and research settings in the United Kingdom and its relation to the development of psychosexual therapy and sex education. Sex. Educ. 8, 381–398 (2008).
Træen, B., Nilsen, T. S. & Stigum, H. Use of pornography in traditional media and on the internet in Norway. J. Sex. Res. 43, 245–254 (2006).
Quilliam, S. Everything you ever wanted to know about sex toys but were too afraid to ask. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care 33, 129–130 (2007).
Dyer, K. & das Nair, R. Why don’t healthcare professionals talk about sex? A systematic review of recent qualitative studies conducted in the United Kingdom. J. Sex. Med. 10, 2658–2670 (2013).
Krychman, M. & Millheiser, L. S. Sexual health issues in women with cancer. J. Sex. Med. 10, 5–15 (2013).
Pinkerton, S. D. et al. The pleasures of sex: an empirical investigation. Cogn. Emot. 17, 341–353 (2003).
Washington, K. Lieberman, Hallie. Buzz: a stimulating history of the sex toy. J. Sex Marital Ther. 44, 613–614 (2018).
Wood, R. Consumer sexualities: women and sex shopping (Routledge, 2017).
Frith, H. Orgasmic bodies: the orgasm in contemporary Western culture (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
Lieberman, H. Intimate transactions: sex toys and the sexual discourse of second-wave feminism. Sex. Cult. 21, 96–120 (2017).
Bloom, J. Reading the Male Gaze in Literature and Culture: Studies in Erotic Epistemology (Springer, 2017).
Comella, L. Vibrator Nation: How Feminist Sex-Toy Stores Changed the Business of Pleasure (Duke Univ., 2017).
Davis, C. M. et al. Characteristics of vibrator use among women. J. Sex. Res. 33, 313–320 (1996).
Wong, K. The sex tech revolution is finally here. And women are leading it. The Story Exchange https://thestoryexchange.org/sex-tech-revolution-finally-here-women-leading-it/ (2019).
Dixon, E. How innovative design is reshaping the sex tech industry. CNN https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/sex-tech-design/index.html (2020).
Kubes, T. New materialist perspectives on sex robots. A feminist dystopia/utopia? Soc. Sci. 8, 224 (2019).
Williams, D. J. et al. Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. J. Posit. Sexuality 1, 6–11 (2015).
Louisa, A. Pleasure’s perils? Critically reflecting on pleasure’s inclusion in sexuality education. Sexualities 15, 455–471 (2012).
Wood, R., Hirst, J., Wilson, L. & Burns-O’Connell, G. The pleasure imperative? Reflecting on sexual pleasure’s inclusion in sex education and sexual health. Sex. Educ. 19, 1–14 (2019).
Ventus, D. et al. Vibrator-assisted start–stop exercises improve premature ejaculation symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49, 1559–1573 (2020).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Urology thanks J. Rullo, N. Döring and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A handbook of sexual devices for people with physical disabilities: https://icord.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/PleasureABLE-Sexual-Device-Manual-for-PWD.pdf
External Penile Rigidity Devices - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/external-penile-rigidity-devices-class-ii-special-controls-guidance-document-industry-and-fda-staff
- Sexual script
Sexual scripting suggests the importance of meanings and symbols in human sexuality. A script can be layered through three dimensions: cultural scenarios, interpersonal scenarios and intrapsychic scenarios. A sexual sensation does not simply emerge from bodily reactions, but needs to be assigned meanings and symbols that provide cues and clues to enable sexualities to develop. Sexual scripts are blueprints and guidelines for what we define as our role in sexual expression, sexual orientation, sexual behaviours, sexual desires and the sexual component of our self-definition.
The highest level of psychological development, whereby a person’s potential is fully realized after basic bodily and ego needs have been fulfilled. People are able to accept themselves and others as they are.
- Rape myths
First described by M. Burt in 1980, rape myths are prejudiced, stereotyped and false assumptions about sexual attacks, rapists and rape victims. Rape myths are often used to excuse sexual assault, foster animosity toward victims and distort criminal justice.
- Feminist discourses
A wide range of analytical work in psychology from a feminist perspective. It constitutes a thorough critical evaluation of intellectual, social and political changes that are needed to promote female rights.
- Male gaze
Suggests a sexualized way of looking that empowers men and objectifies women. The woman is visually positioned as an object of heterosexual male desire.
About this article
Cite this article
Dewitte, M., Reisman, Y. Clinical use and implications of sexual devices and sexually explicit media. Nat Rev Urol 18, 359–377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00456-2