Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Patterns of sexual behavior and psychological processes in asexual persons: a systematic review

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 33, pages 641–651 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Asexuality is commonly regarded as lack of sexual attraction. Research in asexuality grew progressively in the past two decades. However, asexuals’ patterns of sexual behavior and psychological processes were not yet systematized. This review searched for articles that could potentially help establishing these patterns. Articles published in English until December 31st 2019 were retrieved from Medline, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycARTICLES. A systematic search was conducted using an exhaustive list of key terms regarding asexuality and sexual behavior following PRISMA guidelines. Of the 195 initially retrieved, only 23 were considered for this review. Of the 23 articles, 16 were quantitative studies, 5 were qualitative studies, and 2 comprised quantitative and qualitative studies. Overall, current findings suggest that asexuals present great heterogeneity of sexual behaviors and psychological processes regarding sexuality, including different aspects and types of interpersonal and romantic relationships, sexual attitudes or fantasies. Conversely, data did not find support for the claim that asexuals present impaired sexual functioning. The little geographic and cultural diversity of the samples is a major limitation in these studies, preventing the properly representation of asexuals. Furthermore, asexuals may benefit from evidence on the biopsychosocial factors shaping sexual, emotional, and relationship well-being, as far as such evidence is built upon asexuals’ lenses, rather than on heteronormativity criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogaert AF. Asexuality: what it is and why it matters. J Sex Res. 2015;52:362–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brotto LA, Knudson G, Inskip J, Rhodes K, Erskine Y. Asexuality: a mixed-methods approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:599–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogaert AF, Ashton MC, Lee K. Personality and sexual orientation: extension to asexuality and the HEXACO model. J Sex Res. 2018;55:951–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brotto LA, Yule MA. Asexuality: sexual orientation, paraphilia, sexual dysfunction, or none of the above? Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:619–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greaves LM, Barlow FK, Huang Y, Stronge S, Fraser G, Sibley CG. Asexual identity in a New Zealand national sample: demographics, well-being, and health. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:2417–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosario M, Schrimshaw EW. Theories and etiologies of sexual orientation. In: Tolman DL, Diamond LM, editors. APA Handbook of sexuality and psychology. 1: Person-based approaches: American Psychological Association; 2014.

  7. Gressgård R. Asexuality: from pathology to identity and beyond. Psychol Sexuality. 2013;4:179–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. AVEN. The Asexual Visibility & Education Network: Overview 2020. https://www.asexuality.org/?q=overview.html.

  9. Kinsey AC, Martin CE, Pomeroy WB. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bogaert AF. Asexuality: prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. J Sex Res. 2004;41:279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH. Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1953.

  12. Brotto LA, Yule MA, Gorzalka BB. Asexuality: an extreme variant of sexual desire disorder? J Sex Med. 2015;12:646–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prause N, Graham CA. Asexuality: classification and characterization. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:341–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. Sexual dysfunctions. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.

  15. Yule MA, Brotto LA, Gorzalka BB. Mental health and interpersonal functioning in self-identified asexual men and women. Psychol Sexuality. 2013;4:136–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta K. What does asexuality teach us about sexual disinterest? Recommendations for health professionals based on a qualitative study with asexually identified people. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Houdenhove E, Enzlin P, Gijs L. A positive approach toward asexuality: some first steps, but still a long way to go. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:647–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson M, McDonnell L, Scott S. Negotiating the boundaries of intimacy: the personal lives of asexual people. Sociol Rev. 2016;64:349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yule MA, Brotto LA, Gorzalka BB. Sexual fantasy and masturbation among asexual individuals. Can J Hum Sexuality. 2014;23:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yule MA, Brotto LA, Gorzalka BB. Sexual fantasy and masturbation among asexual individuals: an in-depth exploration. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:311–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bulmer M, Izuma K. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward sex and romance in asexuals. J Sex Res. 2018;55:962–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carrigan M. There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities. 2011;14:462–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng L, Su Y. Patterns ofM asexuality in china: sexual activity, sexual and romantic attraction, and sexual desire. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:1265–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aicken CR, Mercer CH, Cassell JA. Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys. Psychol Sexuality. 2013;4:121–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu T-c, Herbenick D, Dodge B, Owens C, Sanders SA, Reece M, et al. Relationships among sexual identity, sexual attraction, and sexual behavior: results from a nationally representative probability sample of adults in the United States. Arch Sexual Behav. 2018:1–11.

  27. Rothblum ED, Krueger EA, Kittle KR, Meyer IH. Asexual and non-asexual respondents from a us population-based study of sexual minorities. Arch Sexual Behav. 2019:1–11.

  28. Scherrer KS. Coming to an asexual identity: negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities. 2008;11:621–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nobre PJ, Pinto‐Gouveia J. Dysfunctional sexual beliefs as vulnerability factors for sexual dysfunction. J Sex Res. 2006;43:68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carvalho J, Lemos D, Nobre PJ. Psychological features and sexual beliefs characterizing self-labeled asexual individuals. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43:517–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitive and emotional predictors of female sexual dysfunctions: preliminary findings. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34:325–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carvalho J, Nobre P. Biopsychosocial determinants of men’s sexual desire: testing an integrative model. J Sex Med. 2011;8:754–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Petty RE, Briñol P, DeMarree KG. The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Soc Cogn. 2007;25:657–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenwald A, Banaji M. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev. 1995;102:4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dosch A, Belayachi S, Van, der Linden M. Implicit and explicit sexual attitudes: how are they related to sexual desire and sexual satisfaction in men and women. J Sex Res. 2016;53:251–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bogaert AF. Asexuality and autochorissexualism (identity-less sexuality). Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:1513–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Vukadinovic Z. The relation between mood and sexuality in gay men. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:231–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Long JS. The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:217–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bancroft J, Vukadinovic Z. Sexual addiction, sexual compulsivity, sexual impulsivity, or what? Toward a theoretical model. J Sex Res. 2004;41:225–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reid RC, Garos S, Carpenter BN. Reliability, validity, and psychometric development of the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory in an outpatient sample of men. Sex Addiction Compulsivity. 2011;18:30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spector IP, Carey MP, Steinberg L. The Sexual Desire Inventory: development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. J Sex Marital Ther. 1996;22:175–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yule MA, Brotto LA, Gorzalka BB. A validated measure of no sexual attraction: the Asexuality Identification Scale. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brotto LA, Yule MA. Physiological and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:699–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chivers ML, Seto MC, Lalumiere ML, Laan E, Grimbos T. Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:5–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zamboni BD, Madero G. Exploring asexuality within an adult baby/diaper lover community. Psychol Sexuality. 2018;9:174–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Houdenhove E, Gijs L, T’Sjoen G, Enzlin P. Stories about asexuality: a qualitative study on asexual women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015a;41:262–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Frost DM. Similarities and differences in the pursuit of intimacy among sexual minority and heterosexual individuals: a personal projects analysis. J Soc Issues. 2011;67:282–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Haefner C. Asexual scripts: a grounded theory inquiry into the intrapsychic scripts asexuals use to negotiate romantic relationships [Doctoral Thesis]. Palo Alto, California: Institute of Transpersonal Psychology; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  49. O’Sullivan LF, Allgeier ER. Feigning sexual desire: consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. J Sex Res. 1998;35:234–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hinderliter AC. Methodological issues for studying asexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38:619–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Houdenhove E, Gijs L, T’Sjoen G, Enzlin P. Asexuality: a multidimensional approach. J Sex Res. 2015b;52:669–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Leonor de Oliveira

  2. School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Lusófona University of Humanities and Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal

    Joana Carvalho

  3. Department of Urology, Gulhane Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

    Selcuk Sarikaya

  4. Department of Urology, Haydarpasa Numune Research & Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ahmet Urkmez

  5. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Salonia

  6. University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Salonia

  7. Urology section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Giorgio Ivan Russo

Authors
  1. Leonor de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joana Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Selcuk Sarikaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmet Urkmez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Salonia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giorgio Ivan Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the EAU-YAU Men’s Health Working group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Carvalho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, L., Carvalho, J., Sarikaya, S. et al. Patterns of sexual behavior and psychological processes in asexual persons: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res 33, 641–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0336-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links