Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Multiple sclerosis and cognition: synaptic failure and network dysfunction

Nature Reviews Neuroscience volume 19, pages 599–609 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized to be a core feature of multiple sclerosis (MS), with important implications for the everyday life of individuals with MS and for disease management. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms that underlie this cognitive impairment are poorly understood and there are no effective therapeutic options for this aspect of the disease. During MS, focal brain inflammatory lesions, together with pathological changes of both CNS grey matter and normal-appearing white matter, can interfere with cognitive functions. Moreover, inflammation may alter the crosstalk between the immune and the nervous systems, modulating the induction of synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission. In this Review, we examine the CNS structures and cognitive domains that are affected by the disease, with a specific focus on hippocampal involvement in MS and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an experimental model of MS. We also discuss the hypothesis that, during MS, immune-mediated alterations of synapses’ ability to express long-term plastic changes may contribute to the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment by interfering with the dynamics of neuronal networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Putative mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.
Fig. 2: Physiological synaptic plasticity and its disruption during neuroinflammation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ontaneda, D., Thompson, A. J., Fox, R. J. & Cohen, J. A. Progressive multiple sclerosis: prospects for disease therapy, repair, and restoration of function. Lancet 389, 1357–1366 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Compston, A. & Coles, A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 359, 1221–1231 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Comi, G., Radaelli, M. & Soelberg Sørensen, P. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet 389, 1347–1356 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Filippi, M. et al. Attendees of the correlation between pathological MRI findings in MS workshop. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 11, 349–360 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calabrese, M. et al. Exploring the origins of grey matter damage in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 147–158 (2015). This review focuses on the pathogenesis of grey matter damage during MS.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charcot, J. M. Lectures on diseases of the nervous system (London: New Sydenham Society, 1877).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiaravalloti, N. D. & DeLuca, J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 7, 1139–1151 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Langdon, D. W. Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 24, 244–249 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeLuca, G. C., Yates, R. L., Beale, H. & Morrow, S. A. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical, radiologic and pathologic insights. Brain Pathol. 25, 79–98 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Filippo, M., Sarchielli, P., Picconi, B. & Calabresi, P. Neuroinflammation and synaptic plasticity: theoretical basis for a novel, immune-centred, therapeutic approach to neurological disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 402–412 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocca, M. A. et al. Clinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 14, 302–317 (2015). This paper presents an elegant review on both clinical and neuroimaging aspects of cognitive impairment in MS.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amato, M. P. et al. Association of MRI metrics and cognitive impairment in radiologically isolated syndromes. Neurology 78, 309–314 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruano, L. et al. Age and disability drive cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis across disease subtypes. Mult Scler. 23, 1258–1267 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldschmidt, T., Antel, J., König, F. B., Brück, W. & Kuhlmann, T. Remyelination capacity of the MS brain decreases with disease chronicity. Neurology 72, 1914–1921 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Achiron, A. et al. Cognitive patterns and progression in multiple sclerosis: construction and validation of percentile curves. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 744–749 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Deloire, M., Ruet, A., Hamel, D., Bonnet, M. & Brochet, B. Early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis predicts disability outcome several years later. Mult. Scler. 16, 581–587 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moccia, M. et al. Cognitive impairment at diagnosis predicts 10-year multiple sclerosis progression. Mult. Scler. 22, 659–667 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zipoli, V. et al. Cognitive impairment predicts conversion to multiple sclerosis in clinically isolated syndromes. Mult. Scler. 16, 62–67 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrow, S. A. et al. On-road assessment of fitness-to-drive in persons with MS with cognitive impairment: a prospective study. Mult. Scler. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517723991 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultheis, M. T. et al. Examining the relationship between cognition and driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91, 465–473 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrow, S. A. et al. Predicting loss of employment over three years in multiple sclerosis: clinically meaningful cognitive decline. Clin. Neuropsychol. 24, 1131–1145 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L. & Unverzagt, F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41, 685–691 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edn (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

  24. Cotter, J. et al. Social cognition in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 87, 1727–1736 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dineen, R. A. et al. Disconnection as a mechanism for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Brain 132, 239–249 (2009). This study investigates the possibility that cognitive dysfunction in MS is related to the disconnection of cognitively important processing regions by white matter damage.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Preziosa, P. et al. Structural MRI correlates of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 1627–1644 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calabrese, M. et al. Cortical lesions and atrophy associated with cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 66, 1144–1150 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrison, D. M. et al. Association of cortical lesion burden on 7-T magnetic resonance imaging with cognition and disability in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 72, 1004–1012 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Preziosa, P. et al. DT MRI microstructural cortical lesion damage does not explain cognitive impairment in MS. Mult. Scler. 23, 1918–1928 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bellmann-Strobl, J. et al. Poor PASAT performance correlates with MRI contrast enhancement in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 73, 1624–1627 (2009). This study shows that the performance of individuals with MS on the PASAT is affected by the appearance of MRI contrast-enhancing lesions, surrogate markers of CNS inflammatory activity.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pardini, M. et al. Isolated cognitive relapses in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 85, 1035–1037 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mori, F. et al. Early treatment with high-dose interferon beta-1a reverses cognitive and cortical plasticity deficits in multiple sclerosis. Funct. Neurol. 27, 163–168 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heesen, C. et al. Correlates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav. Immun. 24, 1148–1155 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonnier, G. et al. Multicontrast MRI quantification of focal inflammation and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 569123 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Steenwijk, M. D. et al. Cortical atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis are non-random and clinically relevant. Brain 139, 115–126 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bergsland, N., Zivadinov, R., Dwyer, M. G., Weinstock-Guttman, B. & Benedict, R. H. Localized atrophy of the thalamus and slowed cognitive processing speed in MS patients. Mult. Scler. 22, 1327–1336 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Batista, S. et al. Basal ganglia, thalamus and neocortical atrophy predicting slowed cognitive processing in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 259, 139–146 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Planche, V. et al. Regional hippocampal vulnerability in early multiple sclerosis: dynamic pathological spreading from dentate gyrus to CA1. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 1814–1824 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cocozza, S. et al. Cerebellar lobule atrophy and disability in progressive MS. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 88, 1065–1072 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Granberg, T. et al. Corpus callosum atrophy is strongly associated with cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: results of a 17-year longitudinal study. Mult. Scler. 21, 1151–1158 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Batista, S. et al. Impairment of social cognition in multiple sclerosis: amygdala atrophy is the main predictor. Mult. Scler. 23, 1358–1366 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Batista, S. et al. Disconnection as a mechanism for social cognition impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 89, 38–45 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Eftekhari, E. et al. Normal appearing white matter permeability: a marker of inflammation and information processing speed deficit among relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroradiology 59, 771–780 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Filippi, M. et al. The contribution of MRI in assessing cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 75, 2121–2128 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Muhlert, N. et al. Memory in multiple sclerosis is linked to glutamate concentration in grey matter regions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 85, 833–839 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Pellicano, C. et al. Cognitive impairment and its relation to imaging measures in multiple sclerosis: a study using a computerized battery. J. Neuroimag. 23, 445–452 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sicotte, N. L. et al. Regional hippocampal atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain 131, 1134–1141 (2008). This study demonstrates that individuals with MS present with hippocampal atrophy and that hippocampal volume loss is associated with poor performance on word-list learning.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Benedict, R. H., Ramasamy, D., Munschauer, F., Weinstock-Guttman, B. & Zivadinov, R. Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: correlation with deep grey matter and mesial temporal atrophy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 201–206 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Debernard, L. et al. Deep grey matter MRI abnormalities and cognitive function in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Psychiatry Res. 234, 352–361 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. González Torre, J. A. et al. Hippocampal dysfunction is associated with memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: a volumetric and functional connectivity study. Mult. Scler. 23, 1854–1863 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hulst, H. E. et al. Functional adaptive changes within the hippocampal memory system of patients with multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 2268–2280 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hulst, H. E. et al. Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: relevance of hippocampal activation and hippocampal connectivity. Mult. Scler. 21, 1705–1712 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koenig, K. A. et al. Hippocampal volume is related to cognitive decline and fornicial diffusion measures in multiple sclerosis. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32, 354–358 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Longoni, G. et al. Deficits in memory and visuospatial learning correlate with regional hippocampal atrophy in MS. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 435–444 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Planche, V. et al. Hippocampal microstructural damage correlates with memory impairment in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 23, 1214–1224 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sumowski, J. F. et al. Mesial temporal lobe and subcortical grey matter volumes differentially predict memory across stages of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 24, 675–678 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sacco, R. et al. Cognitive impairment and memory disorders in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the role of white matter, gray matter and hippocampus. J. Neurol. 262, 1691–1697 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cawley, N. et al. Reduced gamma-aminobutyric acid concentration is associated with physical disability in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 138, 2584–2595 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Rahn, K. A. et al. Inhibition of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) activity as a treatment for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20101–20106 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Papadopoulos, D. et al. Substantial archaeocortical atrophy and neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 19, 238–253 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Dutta, R. et al. Demyelination causes synaptic alterations in hippocampi from multiple sclerosis patients. Ann. Neurol. 69, 445–454 (2011). This study demonstrates that demyelinated hippocampi in MS show marked decreases in synaptic density and in the levels of neuronal proteins known to be important for learning and memory processes, such as those involved in glutamate neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jürgens, T. et al. Reconstruction of single cortical projection neurons reveals primary spine loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain 139, 39–46 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Michailidou, I. et al. Complement C1q-C3-associated synaptic changes in multiple sclerosis hippocampus. Ann. Neurol. 77, 1007–1026 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Colasanti, A. et al. Hippocampal neuroinflammation, functional connectivity, and depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 62–72 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Herranz, E. et al. Neuroinflammatory component of gray matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 80, 776–790 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Dutra, R. C. et al. Spatial reference memory deficits precede motor dysfunction in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model: the role of kallikrein-kinin system. Brain Behav. Immun. 33, 90–101 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Assini, F. L., Duzzioni, M. & Takahashi, R. N. Object location memory in mice: pharmacological validation and further evidence of hippocampal CA1 participation. Behav. Brain Res. 204, 206–211 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Acharjee, S. et al. Altered cognitive-emotional behavior in early experimental autoimmune encephalitis — cytokine and hormonal correlates. Brain Behav. Immun. 33, 164–172 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. D’Intino, G. et al. Cognitive deficit associated with cholinergic and nerve growth factor down-regulation in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in rats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3070–3075 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Di Filippo, M. et al. Persistent activation of microglia and NADPH oxidase drive hippocampal dysfunction in experimental multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 6, 20926 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Lemon, N. & Manahan-Vaughan, D. Dopamine D1/D5 receptors gate the acquisition of novel information through hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression. J. Neurosci. 26, 7723–7729 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ziehn, M. O. et al. Therapeutic testosterone administration preserves excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus during autoimmune demyelinating disease. J. Neurosci. 32, 12312–12324 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Habbas, S. et al. Neuroinflammatory TNFα impairs memory via astrocyte signaling. Cell 163, 1730–1741 (2015). This elegant study shows that inflammation results in persistent functional modification of hippocampal excitatory synapses and contextual learning and memory impairment in EAE.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Titley, H. K., Brunel, N. & Hansel, C. Toward a neurocentric view of learning. Neuron 95, 19–32 (2017). This recent work integrates the synaptic and neuronal mechanisms of learning.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Bliss, T. V. & Lomo, T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the performant path. J. Physiol. 232, 331–356 (1973). This article presents the first description of LTP, now recognized as a neurobiological model of memory processes.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bliss, T. V. & Collingridge, G. L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361, 31–39 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Nicoll, R. A. A. Brief history of long-term potentiation. Neuron 93, 281–290 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Malenka, R. C. & Bear, M. F. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 44, 5–21 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Malenka, R. C. & Nicoll, R. A. Long-term potentiation — a decade of progress? Science 285, 1870–1874 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Yirmiya, R. & Goshen, I. Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis. Brain Behav. Immun. 25, 181–213 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kettenmann, H., Kirchhoff, F. & Verkhratsky, A. Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper. Neuron 77, 10–18 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Wu, Y., Dissing-Olesen, L., MacVicar, B. A. & Stevens, B. Microglia: dynamic mediators of synapse development and plasticity. Trends Immunol. 36, 605–613 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Brambilla, R. et al. Astrocytes play a key role in EAE pathophysiology by orchestrating in the CNS the inflammatory response of resident and peripheral immune cells and by suppressing remyelination. Glia 62, 452–467 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Liddelow, S. A. & Barres, B. A. Reactive astrocytes: production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity 46, 957–967 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Lloyd, A. F., Davies, C. L. & Miron, V. E. Microglia: origins, homeostasis, and roles in myelin repair. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 47, 113–120 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lloyd, A. F. & Miron, V. E. Cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning macrophage activation during remyelination. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 60 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Miron, V. E. Microglia-driven regulation of oligodendrocyte lineage cells, myelination, and remyelination. J. Leukoc. Biol. 101, 1103–1108 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Redford, E. J., Kapoor, R. & Smith, K. J. Nitric oxide donors reversibly block axonal conduction: demyelinated axons are especially susceptible. Brain 120, 2149–2157 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Cibelli, M. et al. Role of interleukin-1beta in postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Ann. Neurol. 68, 360–368 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Williamson, L. L. & Bilbo, S. D. Chemokines and the hippocampus: a new perspective on hippocampal plasticity and vulnerability. Brain Behav. Immun. 30, 186–194 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Di Filippo, M. et al. Synaptic plasticity and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: implications for multiple sclerosis. Brain Res. 1621, 205–213 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Di Filippo, M. et al. Effects of central and peripheral inflammation on hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neurobiol. Dis. 52, 229–236 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kim, D. Y. et al. Inflammation-mediated memory dysfunction and effects of a ketogenic diet in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. PLOS ONE 7, e35476 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Mosayebi, G., Soleyman, M. R., Khalili, M., Mosleh, M. & Palizvan, M. R. Changes in synaptic transmission & long-term potentiation induction as a possible mechanism for learning disability in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Int. Neurourol. J. 20, 26–32 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Prochnow, N., Gold, R. & Haghikia, A. An electrophysiologic approach to quantify impaired synaptic transmission and plasticity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 264, 48–53 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Nisticò, R. et al. Inflammation subverts hippocampal synaptic plasticity in experimental multiple sclerosis. PLOS ONE 8, e54666 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Novkovic, T., Shchyglo, O., Gold, R. & Manahan-Vaughan, D. Hippocampal function is compromised in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience 309, 100–112 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Planche, V. et al. Selective dentate gyrus disruption causes memory impairment at the early stage of experimental multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav. Immun. 60, 240–254 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ajami, B., Bennett, J. L., Krieger, C., McNagny, K. M. & Rossi, F. M. Infiltrating monocytes trigger EAE progression, but do not contribute to the resident microglia pool. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1142–1149 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Gardoni, F. et al. Decreased NR2B subunit synaptic levels cause impaired long-term potentiation but not long-term depression. J. Neurosci. 29, 669–677 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Kamsler, A. & Segal, M. Hydrogen peroxide modulation of synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 23, 269–276 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Minagar, A. et al. The thalamus and multiple sclerosis: modern views on pathologic, imaging, and clinical aspects. Neurology 80, 210–219 (2013). This comprehensive manuscript discusses the role of thalamic damage in MS.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Kipp, M. et al. Thalamus pathology in multiple sclerosis: from biology to clinical application. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1127–1147 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Parmar, K. et al. The role of the cerebellum in multiple sclerosis-150 years after Charcot. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 89, 85–98 (2018). This article presents a review on cerebellar involvement in MS, including its potential role in MS-related cognitive impairment.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Benedict, R. H. et al. Clinical significance of atrophy and white matter mean diffusivity within the thalamus of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 19, 1478–1484 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Bisecco, A. et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of the thalamus in multiple sclerosis and its implications for cognitive impairment: a multicenter study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 2809–2825 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bisecco, A. et al. Attention and processing speed performance in multiple sclerosis is mostly related to thalamic volume. Brain Imag. Behav. 12, 20–28 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ruet, A. et al. Information processing speed impairment and cerebellar dysfunction in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 347, 246–250 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Allen, G., Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C. & Courchesne, E. Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 275, 1940–1943 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C. & Yeo, B. T. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2322–2345 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. D’Ambrosio, A. et al. Cerebellar contribution to motor and cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis: an MRI sub-regional volumetric analysis. Mult. Scler. 23, 1194–1203 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Moroso, A. et al. Posterior lobules of the cerebellum and information processing speed at various stages of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 88, 146–151 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Houtchens, M. K. et al. Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 69, 1213–1223 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Schoonheim, M. M. et al. Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84, 776–783 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. DeLuca, J., Chelune, G. J., Tulsky, D. S., Lengenfelder, J. & Chiaravalloti, N. D. Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis? J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 26, 550–562 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Costa, S. L., Genova, H. M., DeLuca, J. & Chiaravalloti, N. D. Information processing speed in multiple sclerosis: past, present, and future. Mult. Scler. 23, 772–789 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Kern, K. C. et al. Thalamic-hippocampal-prefrontal disruption in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 8, 440–447 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Foong, J. et al. Executive function in multiple sclerosis. The role of frontal lobe pathology. Brain. 120, 15–26 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Foong, J. et al. Correlates of executive function in multiple sclerosis: the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy as an index of focal pathology. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 11, 45–50 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Muhlert, N. et al. Diffusion MRI-based cortical complexity alterations associated with executive function in multiple sclerosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 38, 54–63 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Muhlert, N. et al. The grey matter correlates of impaired decision-making in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86, 530–536 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Weygandt, M. et al. Brain activity, regional gray matter loss, and decision-making in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 24, 1163–1173 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Koini, M. et al. Correlates of executive functions in multiple sclerosis based on structural and functional MR imaging: insights from a multicenter study. Radiology 280, 869–879 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Leavitt, V. M., Lengenfelder, J., Moore, N. B., Chiaravalloti, N. D. & DeLuca, J. The relative contributions of processing speed and cognitive load to working memory accuracy in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 33, 580–586 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Lengenfelder, J. et al. Processing speed interacts with working memory efficiency in multiple sclerosis. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 21, 229–238 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Macniven, J. A. et al. Stroop performance in multiple sclerosis: information processing, selective attention, or executive functioning? J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 14, 805–814 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Sachdev, P. S. et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10, 634–642 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Henry, J. D., von Hippel, W., Molenberghs, P., Lee, T. & Sachdev, P. S. Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 28–39 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Chalah, M. A. et al. Theory of mind in multiple sclerosis: a neuropsychological and MRI study. Neurosci. Lett. 658, 108–113 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Mesulam, M. M. (ed.). Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).

  131. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W. & Fischer, J. S. Neuropsychological Assessment 4th edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).

  132. Sumowski, J. F. et al. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: state of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 90, 278–288 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Benedict, R. H. et al. Validity of the symbol digit modalities test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 23, 721–733 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Benedict, R. H. et al. Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. (MACFIMS). J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 12, 549–558 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Rocca, M. A. et al. Hippocampal-DMN disconnectivity in MS is related to WM lesions and depression. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 5051–5063 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Rossi, F. et al. Relevance of brain lesion location to cognition in relapsing multiple sclerosis. PLOS ONE 7, e44826 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Mandolesi, G. et al. Synaptopathy connects inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 11, 711–724 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Stampanoni Bassi, M. et al. Neurophysiology of synaptic functioning in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 1148–1157 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Mori, F. et al. Cognitive and cortical plasticity deficits correlate with altered amyloid-β CSF levels in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 559–568 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Mancini, A. et al. Hippocampal neuroplasticity and inflammation: relevance for multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Dem. Dis. 2, 2 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Giovannoni, G. et al. Is multiple sclerosis a length-dependent central axonopathy? The case for therapeutic lag and the asynchronous progressive MS hypotheses. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 12, 70–78 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Correale, J., Gaitán, M. I., Ysrraelit, M. C. & Fiol, M. P. Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathogenic mechanisms to treatment. Brain 140, 527–546 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Hemmer, B., Kerschensteiner, M. & Korn, T. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the course of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 14, 406–419 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Lassmann, H. & Bradl, M. Multiple sclerosis: experimental models and reality. Acta Neuropathol. 133, 223–244 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Baxter, A. G. The origin and application of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 904–912 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Baker, D., Gerritsen, W., Rundle, J. & Amor, S. Critical appraisal of animal models of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 17, 647–657 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Sriram, S. & Steiner, I. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: a misleading model of multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 58, 939–945 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Lisman, J., Yasuda, R. & Raghavachari, S. Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 169–182 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Felten, D. L. & Shetty, A. N. Atlante di Neuroscienze di Netter [Italian] 2nd edn (eds Gulisano, M., Falcieri, E. & Cappello, F.) 298 (Elsevier, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.D.F. and P.C. received funding from Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM; project codes 2010/R/10, 2011/R/10 and 2013/R/12). M.D.F. also received support from the Ministero della Salute — Ricerca Finalizzata — Bando Giovani Ricercatori (project code GR-2010-2312924).

Reviewer information

Nature Reviews Neuroscience thanks M. Friese, D. Langdon and B. Weinstock-Guttman and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Massimiliano Di Filippo, Andrea Mancini & Paolo Calabresi

  2. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy

    Emilio Portaccio

  3. IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Calabresi

Authors
  1. Massimiliano Di Filippo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emilio Portaccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Mancini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paolo Calabresi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors all researched data for the article, provided substantial contributions to discussion of content, wrote the article and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Di Filippo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.D.F. participated on advisory boards for and received speaker or writing honoraria and funding for travelling from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. E.P. served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen Idec and Merck Serono, received honoraria for speaking and funding for travelling from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Teva and received research support from Merck Serono. A.M. declares no competing interests. P.C. participated on advisory boards for and received funding for travelling, speaker honoraria and research support from AbbVie, Biogen Idec, Merck, Genzyme, Novartis, Prexton, Teva, UCB and Zambon.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Radiologically isolated syndrome

(RIS). A condition that is characterized by the incidental MRI finding of brain white matter lesions that are highly suggestive of MS and are not explained by another disease process in people without historical accounts of typical MS symptoms. RIS is not considered an MS subtype per se, but patients with RIS can show MRI signs of radiological progression and/or neurological MS symptoms during follow-up.

Clinically isolated syndrome

(CIS). A first clinical episode with features suggestive of MS. It usually occurs in young adults with signs suggesting a lesion in the optic nerve, spinal cord, brainstem or cerebellum or, more rarely, a cerebral hemisphere. CIS develops acutely or subacutely, it lasts more than 24 hours, with or without recovery, and is often the first manifestation of MS.

Expanded Disability Status Scale

(EDSS). A clinical scale aimed at quantifying the neurological disability of patients with MS. The disability score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments. The scale measures disability accrual due to MS and takes into account a wide range of neurological functions, particularly ambulation–lower limb function.

T2-weighted images

Specific conventional MRI sequences widely applied to detect MS lesions. Acute and chronic MS lesions appear on T2-weighted images as areas of high signal intensity compared with the adjacent normal regions.

Contrast-enhancing lesions

Intravenously administered contrast agents, such as gadolinium, accumulate in brain regions where the blood–brain barrier is damaged, an early pathological event in inflammatory MS lesions. The presence of a new inflammatory lesion or the recurrence of inflammation in a pre-existing lesion is thus visualized as areas of enhancement on specific MRI images (postcontrast T1-weighted sequences).

Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test

(PASAT). A neuropsychological test developed to assess IPS. Administration of the test involves the oral presentation of a series of single-digit numbers (either every 3 or 2 seconds) in which the two most recent digits must be summed. It is now recognized that other cognitive domains can contribute to PASAT performance, including attention and working memory.

Symbol Digit Modalities Test

(SDMT). A neuropsychological test designed to assess IPS and sustained attention. During the test, the individual is required to rapidly associate symbols and numbers, and the score depends on the number of correct associations performed in a limited time. Other functions (such as learning and visual performance) can influence the execution of the SDMT.

Long-term potentiation

(LTP). LTP is the best-known form of synaptic plasticity, it is expressed by excitatory synapses throughout the brain and it manifests as a persistent increase in the size of the synaptic component of the evoked response following repeated synaptic activation. It represents a compelling cellular model for learning and memory.

Long-term depression

(LTD). The other major form of long-lasting synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain, characterized by a long-lasting decrease in synaptic strength. Converging evidence supports a key role of LTD in some learning and memory processes.

Homing

The recruitment of circulating immune cells to a specific tissue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Filippo, M., Portaccio, E., Mancini, A. et al. Multiple sclerosis and cognition: synaptic failure and network dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 19, 599–609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0053-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0053-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing