Plant intra-individual and inter-individual variation can be determined by the epigenome, a set of covalent modifications of DNA and chromatin that can alter genome structure and activity without changes to the genome sequence. The epigenome of plant cells is plastic, that is, it can change in response to internal or external cues, such as during development or due to environmental changes, to create a memory of such events. Ongoing advances in technologies to read and write epigenomic patterns with increasing resolution, scale and precision are enabling the extent of plant epigenome variation to be more extensively characterized and functionally interrogated. In this Review, we discuss epigenome dynamics and variation within plants during development and in response to environmental changes, including stress, as well as between plants. We review known or potential functions of such plasticity and emphasize the importance of investigating the causality of epigenomic changes. Finally, we discuss emerging technologies that may underpin future research into plant epigenome plasticity.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Henikoff, S. & Greally, J. M. Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation. Curr. Biol. 26, R644–R648 (2016).
Lappalainen, T. & Greally, J. M. Associating cellular epigenetic models with human phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 441–451 (2017).
Suzuki, M. M. & Bird, A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 465–476 (2008).
Niederhuth, C. E. et al. Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms. Genome Biol. 17, 194 (2016).
Deal, R. B. & Henikoff, S. A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Dev. Cell 18, 1030–1040 (2010).
Lee, L. R., Wengier, D. L. & Bergmann, D. C. Cell-type-specific transcriptome and histone modification dynamics during cellular reprogramming in the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21914–21924 (2019).
Song, Q.-X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in soybean. Mol. Plant 6, 1961–1974 (2013).
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Unique cell-type-specific patterns of DNA methylation in the root meristem. Nat. Plants 2, 16058 (2016).
Niederhuth, C. E. & Schmitz, R. J. Covering your bases: inheritance of DNA methylation in plant genomes. Mol. Plant 7, 472–480 (2014).
Secco, D. et al. Stress induced gene expression drives transient DNA methylation changes at adjacent repetitive elements. eLife 4, e09343 (2015).
Stroud, H. et al. Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice. eLife 2, e00354 (2013).
Stelpflug, S. C., Eichten, S. R., Hermanson, P. J., Springer, N. M. & Kaeppler, S. M. Consistent and heritable alterations of DNA methylation are induced by tissue culture in maize. Genetics 198, 209–218 (2014).
Ong-Abdullah, M. et al. Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525, 533–537 (2015). This work establishes that loss of DNA methylation of a Karma transposable element in oil palm plants with abnormal development that had been regenerated through tissue culture was preventing normal gene expression.
Han, Z. et al. Heritable epigenomic changes to the maize methylome resulting from tissue culture. Genetics 209, 983–995 (2018).
Wibowo, A. et al. Partial maintenance of organ-specific epigenetic marks during plant asexual reproduction leads to heritable phenotypic variation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9145–E9152 (2018).
Gordon, S. P., Chickarmane, V. S., Ohno, C. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Multiple feedback loops through cytokinin signaling control stem cell number within the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16529–16534 (2009).
Xiao, J. et al. Cis and trans determinants of epigenetic silencing by Polycomb repressive complex 2 in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 49, 1546–1552 (2017).
Costa, S. & Dean, C. Storing memories: the distinct phases of Polycomb-mediated silencing of Arabidopsis FLC. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 47, 1187–1196 (2019).
Petrella, R. et al. BPC transcription factors and a Polycomb group protein confine the expression of the ovule identity gene SEEDSTICK in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 102, 582–599 (2020).
Yamamuro, C. et al. Overproduction of stomatal lineage cells in Arabidopsis mutants defective in active DNA demethylation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4062 (2014).
Wang, Y., Xue, X., Zhu, J.-K. & Dong, J. Demethylation of ERECTA receptor genes by IBM1 histone demethylase affects stomatal development. Development 143, 4452–4461 (2016).
Gutzat, R. et al. Arabidopsis shoot stem cells display dynamic transcription and DNA methylation patterns. EMBO J. 39, e103667 (2020).
Higo, A. et al. DNA methylation is reconfigured at the onset of reproduction in rice shoot apical meristem. Nat. Commun. 11, 4079 (2020).
Zhou, M., Palanca, A. M. S. & Law, J. A. Locus-specific control of the de novo DNA methylation pathway in Arabidopsis by the CLASSY family. Nat. Genet. 50, 865–873 (2018).
Zhou, M. et al. The CLASSY family controls tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns in Arabidopsis. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.427869 (2021). This paper identifies that most changes in the DNA methylomes of tissues examined in this study are the result of differences in RdDM levels, rather than other DNA methylation pathways. Expression of locus-specific CLSY chromatin remodellers explains many of the tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation levels.
Long, J. et al. Nurse cell-derived small RNAs define paternal epigenetic inheritance in Arabidopsis. Science 373, eabh0556 (2021).
Walker, J. et al. Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 50, 130–137 (2018). This study identifies many DNA methylation changes in the male reproductive cells as genic targets of RdDM and finds that one change at a gene important for normal meiosis causes abnormal splicing in response to the gain in DNA methylation.
Jiang, H., Wang, F. F., Wu, Y. T., Zhou, X. & Huang, X. Y. Multipolar spindle 1 (MPS1), a novel coiled-coil protein of Arabidopsis thaliana, is required for meiotic spindle organization. Plant J. 59, 1001–1010 (2009).
Zhong, S. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 154–159 (2013).
Lang, Z. et al. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E4511–E4519 (2017). This study mutates the DNA demethylase encoding DML2 gene and shows that DML2 is vital for normal DNA demethylation during fruit ripening of tomatoes and identifies many possible targets of DNA demethylation that may be involved with this process.
Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr. Biol. 12, 1138–1144 (2002).
Gall Trošelj, K., Novak Kujundzic, R. & Ugarkovic, D. Polycomb repressive complex’s evolutionary conserved function: the role of EZH2 status and cellular background. Clin. Epigenet. 8, 55 (2016).
Förderer, A., Zhou, Y. & Turck, F. The age of multiplexity: recruitment and interactions of Polycomb complexes in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 29, 169–178 (2016).
Chanvivattana, Y. et al. Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis. Development 131, 5263–5276 (2004).
Ikeuchi, M. et al. PRC2 represses dedifferentiation of mature somatic cells in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 1, 15089 (2015).
Makarevitch, I. et al. Genomic distribution of maize facultative heterochromatin marked by trimethylation of H3K27. Plant Cell 25, 780–793 (2013).
Eichten, S. R., Vaughn, M. W., Hermanson, P. J. & Springer, N. M. Variation in DNA methylation patterns is more common among maize inbreds than among tissues. Plant Genome 6, plantgenome2012.06.0009 (2013).
Mosquna, A. et al. Regulation of stem cell maintenance by the Polycomb protein FIE has been conserved during land plant evolution. Development 136, 2433–2444 (2009).
Okano, Y. et al. A polycomb repressive complex 2 gene regulates apogamy and gives evolutionary insights into early land plant evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16321–16326 (2009).
Satgé, C. et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation is critical for nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Nat. Plants 2, 16166 (2016).
Horvath, D. P., Anderson, J. V., Chao, W. S. & Foley, M. E. Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 534–540 (2003).
Conde, D. et al. Chilling-responsive DEMETER-LIKE DNA demethylase mediates in poplar bud break. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 2236–2249 (2017).
Zhang, Y. et al. Application of 5-azacytidine induces DNA hypomethylation and accelerates dormancy release in buds of tree peony. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 147, 91–100 (2020).
de la Fuente, L., Conesa, A., Lloret, A., Badenes, M. L. & Ríos, G. Genome-wide changes in histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation associated with bud dormancy release in peach. Tree Genet. Genomes 11, 45 (2015).
Crisp, P. A., Ganguly, D., Eichten, S. R., Borevitz, J. O. & Pogson, B. J. Reconsidering plant memory: intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501340 (2016).
Sani, E., Herzyk, P., Perrella, G., Colot, V. & Amtmann, A. Hyperosmotic priming of Arabidopsis seedlings establishes a long-term somatic memory accompanied by specific changes of the epigenome. Genome Biol. 14, R59 (2013).
Wang, J. et al. A DNA methylation reader-chaperone regulator-transcription factor complex activates OsHKT1;5 expression during salinity stress. Plant Cell 32, 3535–3558 (2020).
Crisp, P. A. et al. Rapid recovery gene downregulation during excess-light stress and recovery in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 29, 1836–1863 (2017).
Ganguly, D. R., Crisp, P. A., Eichten, S. R. & Pogson, B. J. Maintenance of pre-existing DNA methylation states through recurring excess-light stress. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 1657–1672 (2018).
Ganguly, D. R., Stone, B. A. B., Bowerman, A. F., Eichten, S. R. & Pogson, B. J. Excess light priming in Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes with altered DNA methylomes. G3 9, 3611–3621 (2019).
Jiang, C. et al. Environmentally responsive genome-wide accumulation of de novo Arabidopsis thaliana mutations and epimutations. Genome Res. 24, 1821–1829 (2014).
Wibowo, A. et al. Hyperosmotic stress memory in Arabidopsis is mediated by distinct epigenetically labile sites in the genome and is restricted in the male germline by DNA glycosylase activity. eLife 5, e13546 (2016).
Ganguly, D. R., Crisp, P. A., Eichten, S. R. & Pogson, B. J. The Arabidopsis DNA methylome is stable under transgenerational drought stress. Plant Physiol. 175, 1893–1912 (2017).
López, A., Ramírez, V., García-Andrade, J., Flors, V. & Vera, P. The RNA silencing enzyme RNA polymerase V is required for plant immunity. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002434 (2011).
Dowen, R. H. et al. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2183–91 (2012).
Yu, A. et al. Dynamics and biological relevance of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis antibacterial defense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2389–2394 (2013).
Martinez, G., Castellano, M., Tortosa, M., Pallas, V. & Gomez, G. A pathogenic non-coding RNA induces changes in dynamic DNA methylation of ribosomal RNA genes in host plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1553–1562 (2014).
Le, T.-N. et al. DNA demethylases target promoter transposable elements to positively regulate stress responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 15, 458 (2014).
Rambani, A. et al. The methylome of soybean roots during the compatible interaction with the soybean Cyst nematode. Plant Physiol. 168, 1364–1377 (2015).
López Sánchez, A., Stassen, J. H. M., Furci, L., Smith, L. M. & Ton, J. The role of DNA (de)methylation in immune responsiveness of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 88, 361–374 (2016).
Hewezi, T. et al. Cyst nematode parasitism induces dynamic changes in the root epigenome. Plant Physiol. 174, 405–420 (2017).
Slaughter, A. et al. Descendants of primed Arabidopsis plants exhibit resistance to biotic stress. Plant Physiol. 158, 835–843 (2012).
Liu, S. et al. Role of H1 and DNA methylation in selective regulation of transposable elements during heat stress. N. Phytol. 229, 2238–2250 (2021).
Ito, H. et al. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 472, 115–119 (2011).
Cavrak, V. V. et al. How a retrotransposon exploits the plant’s heat stress response for its activation. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004115 (2014).
Stuart, T. et al. Population scale mapping of transposable element diversity reveals links to gene regulation and epigenomic variation. eLife 5, e20777 (2016).
Quadrana, L. et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana mobilome and its impact at the species level. eLife 5, e15716 (2016).
Choi, J. Y. & Purugganan, M. D. Evolutionary epigenomics of retrotransposon-mediated methylation spreading in rice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 365–382 (2018).
Noshay, J. M. et al. Monitoring the interplay between transposable element families and DNA methylation in maize. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008291 (2019).
Luna, E., Bruce, T. J. A., Roberts, M. R., Flors, V. & Ton, J. Next-generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol. 158, 844–853 (2012).
Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401, 157–161 (1999).
Luff, B., Pawlowski, L. & Bender, J. An inverted repeat triggers cytosine methylation of identical sequences in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 3, 505–511 (1999).
Durand, S., Bouché, N., Perez Strand, E., Loudet, O. & Camilleri, C. Rapid establishment of genetic incompatibility through natural epigenetic variation. Curr. Biol. 22, 326–331 (2012).
Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948–952 (2006).
Chen, W. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for somatic inheritance of the spontaneous tomato epimutation Colourless non-ripening. Sci. Rep. 5, 9192 (2015). This work identifies CMT3 as the most significant DNA methyltransferase for the maintenance of the highly stable cnr epiallele in tomatoes, supporting studies that suggested CMT3-related proteins are important for acquisition of novel epialleles.
Schmitz, R. J. et al. Patterns of population epigenomic diversity. Nature 495, 193–198 (2013).
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Epigenomic diversity in a global collection of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Cell 166, 492–505 (2016).
Schmitz, R. J. et al. Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334, 369–373 (2011).
Becker, C. et al. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature 480, 245–249 (2011).
van der Graaf, A. et al. Rate, spectrum, and evolutionary dynamics of spontaneous epimutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6676–6681 (2015).
Hofmeister, B. T. et al. A genome assembly and the somatic genetic and epigenetic mutation rate in a wild long-lived perennial Populus trichocarpa. Genome Biol. 21, 259 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Wendte, J. M., Ji, L. & Schmitz, R. J. Natural variation in DNA methylation homeostasis and the emergence of epialleles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 874–4884 (2020). This work finds that genes with CG DNA methylation in some natural populations of Arabidopsis could either lack DNA methylation in others or have transposable element-like methylation patterns associated with silencing, suggesting that natural epialleles result from mis-targeting of silencing machinery to active genes.
Zilberman, D. An evolutionary case for functional gene body methylation in plants and animals. Genome Biol. 18, 87 (2017).
Bewick, A. J. et al. On the origin and evolutionary consequences of gene body DNA methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9111–9116 (2016).
Wendte, J. M. et al. Epimutations are associated with CHROMOMETHYLASE 3-induced de novo DNA methylation. eLife 8, e47891 (2019).
Hollick, J. B. Paramutation and related phenomena in diverse species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 5–23 (2017).
Jaligot, E., Rival, A., Beulé, T., Dussert, S. & Verdeil, J.-L. Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): the DNA methylation hypothesis. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 684–690 (2000).
Mgbeze, G. C. & Iserhienrhien, A. Somaclonal variation associated with oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) clonal propagation: a review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 13, 989–997 (2014).
Johannes, F. et al. Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000530 (2009).
Reinders, J. et al. Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes Dev. 23, 939–950 (2009).
Soppe, W. J. et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6, 791–802 (2000).
Furci, L. et al. Identification and characterisation of hypomethylated DNA loci controlling quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis. eLife 8, e40655 (2019).
Zhang, Y.-Y., Latzel, V., Fischer, M. & Bossdorf, O. Understanding the evolutionary potential of epigenetic variation: a comparison of heritable phenotypic variation in epiRILs, RILs, and natural ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 121, 257–265 (2018).
Hollwey, E., Watson, M. & Meyer, P. Expression of the C-terminal domain of mammalian TET3 DNA dioxygenase in Arabidopsis thaliana induces heritable methylation changes at rDNA loci. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 7, 243 (2016).
Hollwey, E., Out, S., Watson, M. R. & Heidmann, I. TET3-mediated demethylation in tomato activates expression of a CETS gene that stimulates vegetative growth. Plant Direct 1, e00022 (2017).
Zhang, T.-Q., Xu, Z.-G., Shang, G.-D. & Wang, J.-W. A single-cell RNA sequencing profiles the developmental landscape of Arabidopsis root. Mol. Plant 12, 648–660 (2019).
Denyer, T. et al. Spatiotemporal developmental trajectories in the Arabidopsis root revealed using high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing. Dev. Cell 48, 840–852.e5 (2019).
Zhang, T.-Q., Chen, Y. & Wang, J.-W. A single-cell analysis of the Arabidopsis vegetative shoot apex. Dev. Cell 56, 1056–1074.e8 (2021).
Farmer, A., Thibivilliers, S., Ryu, K. H., Schiefelbein, J. & Libault, M. Single-nucleus RNA and ATAC sequencing reveals the impact of chromatin accessibility on gene expression in Arabidopsis roots at the single-cell level. Mol. Plant 14, 372–383 (2021).
Zhao, Y. & Garcia, B. A. Comprehensive catalog of currently documented histone modifications. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a025064 (2015).
Mulqueen, R. M. et al. Highly scalable generation of DNA methylation profiles in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 428–431 (2018).
Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).
Ku, W. L. et al. Single-cell chromatin immunocleavage sequencing (scChIC-seq) to profile histone modification. Nat. Methods 16, 323–325 (2019).
Bartlett, D. A., Dileep, V., Henikoff, S. & Gilbert, D. M. High throughput genome-wide single cell protein:DNA binding site mapping by targeted insertion of promoters (TIP-seq). bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.17.435909 (2021).
Amabile, A. et al. Inheritable silencing of endogenous genes by hit-and-run targeted epigenetic editing. Cell 167, 219–232.e14 (2016).
Stepper, P. et al. Efficient targeted DNA methylation with chimeric dCas9–Dnmt3a–Dnmt3L methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1703–1713 (2017).
Galonska, C. et al. Genome-wide tracking of dCas9-methyltransferase footprints. Nat. Commun. 9, 597 (2018).
Pflueger, C. et al. A modular dCas9–SunTag DNMT3A epigenome editing system overcomes pervasive off-target activity of direct fusion dCas9–DNMT3A constructs. Genome Res. 28, 1193–1206 (2018).
Ford, E. E. et al. Frequent lack of repressive capacity of promoter DNA methylation identified through genome-wide epigenomic manipulation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/170506 (2017).
Johnson, L. M. et al. SRA- and SET-domain-containing proteins link RNA polymerase V occupancy to DNA methylation. Nature 507, 124 (2014).
Gallego-Bartolomé, J. et al. Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2125–E2134 (2018).
Papikian, A., Liu, W., Gallego-Bartolomé, J. & Jacobsen, S. E. Site-specific manipulation of Arabidopsis loci using CRISPR–Cas9 SunTag systems. Nat. Commun. 10, 729 (2019).
Gallego-Bartolomé, J. et al. Co-targeting RNA polymerases IV and V promotes efficient de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 176, 1068–1082.e19 (2019).
Bewick, A. J. & Schmitz, R. J. Gene body DNA methylation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 36, 103–110 (2017).
Kenchanmane Raju, S. K., Ritter, E. J. & Niederhuth, C. E. Establishment, maintenance, and biological roles of non-CG methylation in plants. Essays Biochem. 63, 743–755 (2019).
Cao, X. et al. Conserved plant genes with similarity to mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4979–4984 (2000).
Finnegan, E. J. & Dennis, E. S. Isolation and identification by sequence homology of a putative cytosine methyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2383–2388 (1993).
Kankel, M. W. et al. Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants. Genetics 163, 1109–1122 (2003).
Zhang, H., Lang, Z. & Zhu, J.-K. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 489–506 (2018).
Watson, M., Hawkes, E. & Meyer, P. Transmission of epi-alleles with MET1-dependent dense methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 9, e105338 (2014).
Papa, C. M., Springer, N. M., Muszynski, M. G., Meeley, R. & Kaeppler, S. M. Maize chromomethylase Zea methyltransferase2 is required for CpNpG methylation. Plant Cell 13, 1919–1928 (2001).
Lindroth, A. M. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292, 2077–2080 (2001).
Johnson, L., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. Interplay between two epigenetic marks. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr. Biol. 12, 1360–1367 (2002).
Johnson, L. M. et al. The SRA methyl-cytosine-binding domain links DNA and histone methylation. Curr. Biol. 17, 379–384 (2007).
Du, J. et al. Mechanism of DNA methylation-directed histone methylation by KRYPTONITE. Mol. Cell 55, 495–504 (2014).
Li, X. et al. Mechanistic insights into plant SUVH family H3K9 methyltransferases and their binding to context-biased non-CG DNA methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8793–E8802 (2018).
Zemach, A. et al. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell 153, 193–205 (2013).
Li, Q. et al. Genetic perturbation of the maize methylome. Plant Cell 26, 4602–4616 (2014).
Stroud, H. et al. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 64–72 (2014).
Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802 (2009).
Rosa, S., Duncan, S. & Dean, C. Mutually exclusive sense–antisense transcription at FLC facilitates environmentally induced gene repression. Nat. Commun. 7, 13031 (2016).
Fang, X. et al. The 3′ processing of antisense RNAs physically links to chromatin-based transcriptional control. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 5316–15321 (2020). This work highlights the importance of interactions between 3′ end RNA processing and chromatin modifications in the creation of a stable epigenetic state.
Yang, H., Howard, M. & Dean, C. Antagonistic roles for H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in the cold-induced epigenetic switch at Arabidopsis FLC. Curr. Biol. 24, 1793–1797 (2014).
Angel, A., Song, J., Dean, C. & Howard, M. A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory. Nature 476, 105–108 (2011).
Finnegan, E. J. & Dennis, E. S. Vernalization-induced trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 at FLC is not maintained in mitotically quiescent cells. Curr. Biol. 17, 1978–1983 (2007).
Yang, H. et al. Distinct phases of Polycomb silencing to hold epigenetic memory of cold in Arabidopsis. Science 357, 1142–1145 (2017).
Jiang, D. & Berger, F. DNA replication-coupled histone modification maintains Polycomb gene silencing in plants. Science 357, 1146–1149 (2017). This work reveals the mechanism of inheritance of PcG repression of genes with H3K27me3 marks in plants via the histone variant H3.1, demonstrating how this mark is epigenetic.
Escobar, T. M., Loyola, A. & Reinberg, D. Parental nucleosome segregation and the inheritance of cellular identity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 379–392 (2021).
Annunziato, A. T. Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819, 196–210 (2013).
Loyola, A. et al. The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1-containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39-mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin. EMBO Rep. 10, 769–775 (2009).
Rowbotham, S. P. et al. Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol. Cell 42, 285–296 (2011).
Jang, S. M. et al. KAP1 facilitates reinstatement of heterochromatin after DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 8788–8802 (2018).
Benoit, M. et al. Replication-coupled histone H3.1 deposition determines nucleosome composition and heterochromatin dynamics during Arabidopsis seedling development. N. Phytol. 221, 385–398 (2019).
Borg, M. et al. Targeted reprogramming of H3K27me3 resets epigenetic memory in plant paternal chromatin. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 621–629 (2020).
The authors thank B. Kidd and A. de Mendoza for critical feedback on this manuscript, and M. Oliva and D. Lam for insightful discussions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Genetics thanks S. Jacobsen, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A recording of past events or actions that is ‘stored’ at the epigenetic level.
The process of generating a heritable phenotypic change without change in the genome sequence, which creates an epiallele.
- DNA methylation
Covalent addition of a methyl group to the fifth carbon of cytosine bases in DNA.
- Histone post-translational modifications
(Histone PTMs). Covalent modification of the tails of histone proteins, around which DNA is wrapped, that can affect gene expression and DNA accessibility.
- Transposable elements
Selfish genetic elements that can expand in copy number within a genome, often at a fitness cost to the host.
Heritable phenotypic changes that are not the result of a change in the genome sequence, often encoded by stable changes in DNA methylation or histone post-translational modifications (PTMs).
The map of epigenetic marks decorating the genome, which can be informative about how epigenetic information can produce a particular phenotype.
- RNA-directed DNA methylation
(RdDM). A molecular pathway in plants, in which small RNAs target de novo DNA methylation and silence the locus.
The process of a differentiated cell adopting the cell type identity of another cell type without going through a dedifferentiation process.
A term to denote a living factor that can influence plant growth, such as a bacterial pathogen.
A term to denote a non-living factor that can have an impact on plant growth, such as salt or heat.
- Epigenetic recombinant inbred lines
(epiRILs). Plants derived from a cross of genetically identical plants, except for one parent harbouring a mutation that disrupts a certain epigenetic mark. Over subsequent generations, the lines become homozygous for the normal or disrupted epigenetic states at particular genomic regions, with each line harbouring normal or altered modification states at different regions in the genome.
- Epigenome-wide association study
A study design that aims to link the presence or absence of an epigenetic mark, such as DNA methylation, at different genomic positions, with a phenotypic trait.
About this article
Cite this article
Lloyd, J.P.B., Lister, R. Epigenome plasticity in plants. Nat Rev Genet (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00407-y