Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene

Abstract

Rhombohedral-stacked multilayer graphene hosts a pair of flat bands touching at zero energy, which should give rise to correlated electron phenomena that can be tuned further by an electric field. Moreover, when electron correlation breaks the isospin symmetry, the valley-dependent Berry phase at zero energy may give rise to topologically non-trivial states. Here we measure electron transport through hexagonal boron nitride-encapsulated pentalayer graphene down to 100 mK. We observed a correlated insulating state with resistance at the megaohm level or greater at charge density n = 0 and displacement field D = 0. Tight-binding calculations predict a metallic ground state under these conditions. By increasing D, we observed a Chern insulator state with C = −5 and two other states with C = −3 at a magnetic field of around 1 T. At high D and n, we observed isospin-polarized quarter- and half-metals. Hence, rhombohedral pentalayer graphene exhibits two different types of Fermi-surface instability, one driven by a pair of flat bands touching at zero energy, and one induced by the Stoner mechanism in a single flat band. Our results establish rhombohedral multilayer graphene as a suitable system for exploring intertwined electron correlation and topology phenomena in natural graphitic materials without the need for moiré superlattice engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Correlation-driven insulator, isospin-symmetry-broken states and Chern insulators in rhombohedral-stacked pentalayer graphene.
Fig. 2: Temperature and magnetic field dependence of the correlated insulator state.
Fig. 3: Correlation-driven Chern insulator states.
Fig. 4: The competing phase at B = 0.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data shown in the main figures are available from the Harvard Dataverse Repository at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ISWXLA. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharpe, A. L. et al. Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605–608 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Serlin, M. et al. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900–903 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, G. et al. Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nat. Phys. 15, 237–241 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, G. et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nature 572, 215–219 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, G. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56–61 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan, E. C. et al. Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 359–363 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, Y. et al. Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 353–358 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, L. et al. Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Mater. 19, 861–866 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, Y. et al. Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215–220 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, C. et al. Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 520–525 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X. et al. Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 221–225 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polshyn, H. et al. Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator. Nature 588, 66–70 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, G. et al. Tunable orbital ferromagnetism at noninteger filling of a moiré superlattice. Nano Lett. 22, 238–245 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Min, H. & MacDonald, A. H. Electronic structure of multilayer graphene. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 176, 227–252 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, F., Sahu, B., Min, H. & MacDonald, A. H. Band structure of ABC-stacked graphene trilayers. Phys. Rev. B 82, 035409 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, F., Jung, J., Fiete, G. A., Niu, Q. & MacDonald, A. H. Spontaneous quantum Hall states in chirally stacked few-layer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801 (2011).

    PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koshino, M. & McCann, E. Trigonal warping and Berry’s phase Nπ in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, N., Li, C., Tang, Y. & Yelgel, C. Electronic structure of ABC-stacked multilayer graphene and trigonal warping: a first principles calculation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 707, 012022 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shi, Y. et al. Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhombohedral graphite. Nature 584, 210–214 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, H. et al. Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 429–433 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, H., Xie, T., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 434–438 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pierucci, D. et al. Evidence for flat bands near the Fermi level in epitaxial rhombohedral multilayer graphene. ACS Nano 9, 5432–5439 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerelsky, A. et al. Moiréless correlations in ABCA graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017366118 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Weitz, R. T., Allen, M. T., Feldman, B. E., Martin, J. & Yacoby, A. Broken-symmetry states in doubly gated suspended bilayer graphene. Science 330, 812–816 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Freitag, F., Trbovic, J., Weiss, M. & Schönenberger, C. Spontaneously gapped ground state in suspended bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 76602 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bao, W. et al. Stacking-dependent band gap and quantum transport in trilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 7, 948–952 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Velasco, J. et al. Transport spectroscopy of symmetry-broken insulating states in bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 156–160 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Myhro, K. et al. Large tunable intrinsic gap in rhombohedral-stacked tetralayer graphene at half filling. 2D Mater. 5, 045013 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pamuk, B., Baima, J., Mauri, F. & Calandra, M. Magnetic gap opening in rhombohedral-stacked multilayer graphene from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075422 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jia, J., Gorbar, E. V. & Gusynin, V. P. Gap generation in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene: screening versus band flattening. Phys. Rev. B 88, 205428 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou, H. et al. Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene. Science 375, 774–778 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. de la Barrera, S. C. et al. Cascade of isospin phase transitions in Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene at zero magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 18, 771–775 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Seiler, A. M. et al. Quantum cascade of correlated phases in trigonally warped bilayer graphene. Nature 608, 298–302 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, F., Min, H., Polini, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Spontaneous inversion symmetry breaking in graphene bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 81, 041402 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jung, J., Zhang, F. & MacDonald, A. H. Lattice theory of pseudospin ferromagnetism in bilayer graphene: competing interaction-induced quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115408 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nandkishore, R. & Levitov, L. Quantum anomalous Hall state in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 115124 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vafek, O. & Yang, K. Many-body instability of Coulomb interacting bilayer graphene: renormalization group approach. Phys. Rev. B 81, 041401 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lemonik, Y., Aleiner, I. & Fal’Ko, V. I. Competing nematic, antiferromagnetic, and spin-flux orders in the ground state of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 245451 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kharitonov, M. Antiferromagnetic state in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195435 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, D. H. et al. Stacking order, interaction, and weak surface magnetism in layered graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 86, 201404 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun, K., Yao, H., Fradkin, E. & Kivelson, S. A. Topological insulators and nematic phases from spontaneous symmetry breaking in 2D Fermi systems with a quadratic band crossing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046811 (2009).

    PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Streda, P. Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions. J. Phys. C 15, L717 (1982).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, J., Tupikov, Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Zhu, J. Effective Landau level diagram of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 47701 (2018).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. McCann, E. & Fal’ko, V. I. Landau-level degeneracy and quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 86805 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Slizovskiy, S., McCann, E., Koshino, M. & Fal’ko, V. I. Films of rhombohedral graphite as two-dimensional topological semimetals. Commun. Phys. 2, 164 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kopnin, N. B., Ijäs, M., Harju, A. & Heikkilä, T. T. High-temperature surface superconductivity in rhombohedral graphite. Phys. Rev. B 87, 140503 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ghazaryan, A., Holder, T., Berg, E. & Serbyn, M. Multilayer graphenes as a platform for interaction-driven physics and topological superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 107, 104502 (2023).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Calvera, V., Kivelson, S. A. & Berg, E. Pseudo-spin order of Wigner crystals in multi-valley electron gases. Low Temp. Phys. 49, 679–700 (2023).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ju, L. et al. Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls. Nature 520, 650–655 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, H. et al. Electrode-free anodic oxidation nanolithography of low-dimensional materials. Nano Lett. 18, 8011–8015 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Geisenhof, F. R. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall octet driven by orbital magnetism in bilayer graphene. Nature 598, 53–58 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Varlet, A. et al. Anomalous sequence of quantum Hall liquids revealing a tunable Lifshitz transition in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 116602 (2014).

    PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge helpful discussions with F. Zhang, T. Senthil, L. Levitov, L. Fu, Z. Dong and A. Patri. L.J. acknowledges support from a Sloan Fellowship. Work by Tonghang Han was supported by NSF grant number DMR- 2225925. The device fabrication of this work was supported by the STC Center for Integrated Quantum Materials, NSF grant number DMR-1231319. Device fabrication was carried out at the Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems and MIT.Nano. Part of the device fabrication was supported by the USD(R&E) under contract no. FA8702-15-D-0001. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers 20H00354, 21H05233 and 23H02052) and World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. H.P. acknowledges support by NSF grant number PHY-1506284 and AFOSR grant number FA9550-21-1-0216. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-2128556* and the State of Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.J. supervised the project. Tonghang Han, Z.L., G.S., J.S. and J.W. performed the DC magneto-transport measurements. Tonghang Han and Tianyi Han fabricated the devices. K.W. and T.T. grew the hBN single crystals. H.P. contributed to the data analysis. All authors discussed the results and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Ju.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks Yuan Cao and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Identification of rhombohedral pentalayer graphene.

a, AFM topography map of a pentalayer graphene sample on a SiO2/Si substrate. (The small region on the right corresponds to a graphene tetralayer.) b, Near-field infrared nanoscopy image of the same pentalayer graphene sample as in a, showing different contrast on the pentalayer region. The bright region corresponds to Bernal stacking and the darker region corresponds to rhombohedral stacking. c, Raman spectra taken at rhombohedral and Bernal stacking domains in the pentalayer graphene sample as in b. ω is the Raman shift.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Single particle band structure and density of states of rhombohedral multilayer graphene.

af, Tight-binding calculation of single-particle band structure and density of states (DOS) for rhombohedral multilayer graphene (layer number N = 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9). Due to the remote hopping terms, the band structure deviates from E ≈ kN at low energy. The rhombohedral pentalayer graphene has the flattest band among all layer numbers.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Correlated insulator at n = D = 0 in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene.

a, The calculated single-particle density of states (DOS) in Bernal bilayer, rhombohedral trilayer (time a factor of 15 and 3 for comparison), and pentalayer graphene at D = 0. The blue and orange shaded areas depict the DOS of the valence and conduction band. bd, The n-D Rxx map of the bilayer, trilayer and pentalayer graphene measured at 2 K. Pentalayer graphene has a much larger DOS and band overlap at n = 0 compared to the bilayer and trilayer case and expects to be more conducting at D = n = 0. However, both bilayer and trilayer graphene are conducting at D = n = 0, while an insulating state appears at D = n = 0 in pentalayer graphene, indicating the non-single-particle origin of the insulating state. The off-diagonal line in the n-D map of pentalayer graphene is due to the big contact resistance when the bottom gate is zero.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Phase diagram for both electron and hole doping.

a, b, Color plots of four-probe resistance Rxx as a function of carrier density n and displacement field D for the hole doping side and electron doping side measured at B = 0 and a temperature of 100 mK. Colored dots label different phases including band insulator (BI), correlated insulator (CI), spin-polarized half metal (SPHM), isospin-polarized quarter metal (IPQM) and unpolarized metal (UP). c, d, Hall resistance Rxy and longitudinal resistance Rxx as a function of the out-of-plane magnetic field at the red dot in a. e, f, Rxy and Rxx at the yellow dot in a. The quarter metal c & d shows a clear anomalous Hall effect and magnetic hysteresis, indicating a net valley polarization. While the half metal e & f does not show anomalous Hall effect or magnetic hysteresis, indicating the absence of net valley polarization. Therefore, we conclude the half metal to be spin polarized but valley unpolarized.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Additional temperature dependence data of the correlated insulator.

a, Temperature dependence of the four-probe resistance Rxx measured at charge neutrality (n = 0). BI and CI stand for band insulator and correlated insulator. The correlated insulator develops below ~ 30 K. The two white arrows indicate the semimetal phase with an anomalous temperature dependence at the low-temperature region, discussed in Fig. 4c. b, Rxx versus D at even higher temperatures. As the temperature is increased, the resistive state at D = 0 disappears and evolves to a dip in Rxx. Circles trace the center of the bumps in Rxx.

Extended Data Fig. 6 The C = -3 state at D = 0.21 V/nm.

a, b, 2D color plot of Rxx and Rxy versus carrier density n and out-of-plane magnetic field B taken at D = 0.21 V/nm at a temperature of 100 mK. The dashed line indicates the C = -3 state. The C = -3 state is the only visible state on the hole doping side at low magnetic fields, in contrast to the electron side where all Landau levels appear at a similar magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Tracing the C = -3 state towards zero magnetic field.

a, 2D color plot of dRxx/dB versus carrier density n and out-of-plane magnetic field B taken at D = 0.11 V/nm at a temperature of 100 mK. The dashed line indicates the C = -3 state. b, 2D color plot of dRxy/dn versus carrier density n and out-of-plane magnetic field B taken at D = 0.11 V/nm at a temperature of 100 mK. The dashed line indicates the C = -3 state. The C = -3 state is the only visible state on the hole doping side at low magnetic field and traces all the way to 0 T. On the electron side, a complete set of Landau levels is observed and disappears at around 1.5 T.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Chern insulators at the negative side of D.

a, 2D color plots of Rxx (upper panel) and Rxy (lower panel) at B = 1 T, revealing three Chern insulator states at the hole-doped side in the gap-closing range of D. The state with a Chern number C = -5 happens at D = -0.15 V/nm, while two states with C = -3 happen at D = -0.093 V/nm and D = -0.2 V/nm, as indicated by the dashed lines. b, c, d, 2D color plots of Rxx (upper panel) and Rxy (lower panel) versus n and B at D = -0.15 V/nm, -0.093 V/nm and -0.2 V/nm respectively. The dashed lines indicate the n-B relation of the Chern insulators as predicted by the Streda formula. These results are consistent with those of the positive D side.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Evolution of the band structure at charge-neutrality with D.

a, Rxx measured at n = 0 at 2 K. b, The band structure schematic of each isospin flavor at charge-neutrality under different D values. The colored dots correspond to the states in a, including LAF (layer antiferromagnet), SM (semimetal), QAH (quantum anomalous Hall) and LP (layer polarized state). The color of each band represents the valley Chern number (black: 5/2, red: -5/2), while the band with a grey color indicates the gap-closing case. c, The layer polarization of the LP, QAH and LAF state. The layer polarization of both conduction and valence band for each isospin flavor is shown, where green and orange color corresponds to the K’ and K valley. At D = 0, the system starts with the LAF state where charges are evenly distributed in the top and bottom layer in a spin-polarized manner (point A). As D increases, the gap of spin up (down) flavor expands (shrinks) due to its layer configuration (point B). It is important to note that the gap sizes of the two valleys with the same spin may differ. Consequently, one of the two gaps closes and reopens first (point C), leading to a situation where the gap of the K valley inverts while the gap of the K’ valley remains the same, resulting in the so-called QAH state (point D). Moreover, the layer polarization becomes partially polarized at this stage. If D continues to increase, the gap of the other valley eventually closes and reopens (point E), leading to the fully layer-polarized state (point F).

Extended Data Fig. 10 Temperature dependence of the SPHM, IPQM and UP states.

Temperature-dependent Rxx at D = 0.16 V/nm and n = 0 (red), D = 0 and n = -2.5*1012cm-2 (light grey, UP), D = 0.26 V/nm and n = -1.9*1012cm-2 (dark grey, SPHM), and D = 0.26 V/nm and n = -0.8*1012cm-2 (black, IPQM).

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and Discussion (Sections I–VII).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, T., Lu, Z., Scuri, G. et al. Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 181–187 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01520-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing