Robust graphene-based molecular devices

Article metrics


One of the main challenges to upscale the fabrication of molecular devices is to achieve a mechanically stable device with reproducible and controllable electronic features that operates at room temperature1,2. This is crucial because structural and electronic fluctuations can lead to significant changes in the transport characteristics at the electrode–molecule interface3,4. In this study, we report on the realization of a mechanically and electronically robust graphene-based molecular junction. Robustness was achieved by separating the requirements for mechanical and electronic stability at the molecular level. Mechanical stability was obtained by anchoring molecules directly to the substrate, rather than to graphene electrodes, using a silanization reaction. Electronic stability was achieved by adjusting the ππ orbitals overlap of the conjugated head groups between neighbouring molecules. The molecular devices exhibited stable current–voltage (IV) characteristics up to bias voltages of 2.0 V with reproducible transport features in the temperature range from 20 to 300 K.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Junction geometry, molecular design and electrical characterization.
Fig. 2: Electrical characterization of devices A (left), B (middle) and C (right) at 20 K exposed to the molecule BPC.
Fig. 3: Transport measurements through a BPC molecular junction (device A) at different temperatures.
Fig. 4: Transport through graphene–molecule–graphene junctions that containing the M and BPC molecule.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Measurements and analysis were performed in Origin and Matlab. All codes are available from the authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    van der Molen, S. J. et al. Visions for a molecular future. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 385–389 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Aradhya, S. V. & Venkataraman, L. Single-molecule junctions beyond electronic transport. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 399–410 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Sadeghi, H., Sangtarash, S. & Lambert, C. Robust molecular anchoring to graphene electrodes. Nano Lett. 17, 4611–4618 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Tao, N. Electron transport in molecular junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 1, 173–181 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Lau, C. S. et al. Redox-dependent Franck–Condon blockade and avalanche transport in a graphene–fullerene single-molecule transistor. Nano Lett. 16, 170–176 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Barreiro, A., van der Zant, H. S. & Vandersypen, L. M. Quantum dots at room temperature carved out from few-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 12, 6096–6100 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Sadeghi, H. et al. Conductance enlargement in picoscale electroburnt graphene nanojunctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2658–2663 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Gehring, P. et al. Quantum interference in graphene nanoconstrictions. Nano Lett. 16, 4210–4216 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Prins, F. et al. Room-temperature gating of molecular junctions using few-layer graphene nanogap electrodes. Nano Lett. 11, 4607–4611 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Jia, C. et al. Covalently bonded single-molecule junctions with stable and reversible photoswitched conductivity. Science 352, 1443–1445 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Su, T. A., Neupane, M., Steigerwald, M. L., Venkataraman, L. & Nuckolls, C. Chemical principles of single-molecule electronics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16002 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Li, S. et al. The evolving quality of frictional contact with graphene. Nature 539, 541–545 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Mol, J. A. et al. Graphene–porphyrin single-molecule transistors. Nanoscale 7, 13181–13185 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Xu, Q. et al. Single electron transistor with single aromatic ring molecule covalently connected to graphene nanogaps. Nano Lett. 17, 5335–5341 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Yao, J., Zhong, L., Natelson, D. & Tour, J. M. Silicon oxide: a non-innocent surface for molecular electronics and nanoelectronics studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 941–948 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Pósa, L. et al. Multiple physical time scales and dead time rule in few-nanometers sized graphene–SiOx–graphene memristors. Nano Lett. 17, 6783–6789 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Aswal, D., Lenfant, S., Guerin, D., Yakhmi, J. & Vuillaume, D. Self-assembled monolayers on silicon for molecular electronics. Anal. Chem. Acta 568, 84–108 (2006).

  18. 18.

    DiBenedetto, S. A., Facchetti, A., Ratner, M. A. & Marks, T. J. Molecular self-assembled monolayers and multilayers for organic and unconventional inorganic thin-film transistor applications. Adv. Mater. 21, 1407–1433 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Krasnoslobodtsev, A. V. & Smirnov, S. N. Effect of water on silanization of silica by trimethoxysilanes. Langmuir 18, 3181–3184 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Hines, T. et al. Transition from tunneling to hopping in single molecular junctions by measuring length and temperature dependence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11658–11664 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Segal, D., Nitzan, A., Davis, W. B., Wasielewski, M. R. & Ratner, M. A. Electron transfer rates in bridged molecular systems 2. A steady-state analysis of coherent tunneling and thermal transitions. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3817–3829 (2000).

  22. 22.

    Kim, H. & Segal, D. Controlling charge transport mechanisms in molecular junctions: distilling thermally induced hopping from coherent-resonant conduction. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 164702 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Hihath, J. Charge transport in the inverted Marcus region. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 276–277 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Yuan, L. et al. Transition from direct to inverted charge transport Marcus regions in molecular junctions via molecular orbital gating. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 322–329 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Selzer, Y., Cabassi, M. A., Mayer, T. S. & Allara, D. L. Thermally activated conduction in molecular junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 4052–4053 (2004).

  26. 26.

    Soler, J. M. et al. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 2745 (2002).

  27. 27.

    Ferrer, J. et al. Gollum: a next-generation simulation tool for electron, thermal and spin transport. New J. Phys. 16, 093029 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Nef, C. et al. High-yield fabrication of nm-size gaps in monolayer CVD graphene. Nanoscale 6, 7249–7254 (2014).

  29. 29.

    El Abbassi, M. et al. From electroburning to sublimation: substrate and environmental effects in the electrical breakdown process of monolayer graphene. Nanoscale 9, 17312–17317 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Chenoweth, K., van Duin, A. C. T. & Goddard, W. A. Reaxff reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 1040–1053 (2008).

Download references


We thank C. Schönenberger for fruitful discussions. This work was partially supported by the European Commission FP7-ITN Molecular-scale Electronics: Concepts, Contacts and Stability (MOLESCO) grant (no. 606728) and the FET open project QuIET (no. 767187). This work was supported by UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Grant EP/M014452/1 and EP/N017188/1 and the European Research Council Advanced Grant (Mols@Mols). H.S. acknowledges the UK Research and Innovation for Future Leaders Fellowship no. MR/S015329/1 and the Leverhulme Trust for Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship no. ECF-2017-186. S.S. acknowledges the Leverhulme Trust for Early Career Fellowship no. ECF-2018-375. M.L.P. acknowledges the funding by the EMPAPOSTDOCS-II programme, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska–Curie Grant Agreement no. 754364. O.B. acknowledges technical support from the Binning and Rohrer Nanotechnology Center (BRNC).

Author information

M.E.A. conducted the measurements and performed the data analysis. O.B. and M.E.A. fabricated the devices. X.L, S.-X.L., S.D. and S.Y. provided the molecules. S.S. and H.S. provided the theory and performed the DFT calculations. M.E.A., M.L.P., H.S., H.S.J.vdZ., C.L. and M.C. designed and supervised the study. M.E.A., M.L.P., S.S. and H.S. wrote the paper. M.E.A., M.L.P., S.S., H.S. and M.C. participated in the discussion of the data. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Correspondence to Shi-Xia Liu or Hatef Sadeghi or Michel Calame.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Nanotechnology thanks Dirk Mayer and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–9 and refs. 1–3.

Supplementary Movie 1

MD movie molecule C.

Supplementary Movie 2

MD movie molecule BPC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading